Pith. sign in

hub

"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier

27 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 347 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

27 Pith papers citing it
347 external citations · Pith
abstract

Despite widespread adoption, machine learning models remain mostly black boxes. Understanding the reasons behind predictions is, however, quite important in assessing trust, which is fundamental if one plans to take action based on a prediction, or when choosing whether to deploy a new model. Such understanding also provides insights into the model, which can be used to transform an untrustworthy model or prediction into a trustworthy one. In this work, we propose LIME, a novel explanation technique that explains the predictions of any classifier in an interpretable and faithful manner, by learning an interpretable model locally around the prediction. We also propose a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem. We demonstrate the flexibility of these methods by explaining different models for text (e.g. random forests) and image classification (e.g. neural networks). We show the utility of explanations via novel experiments, both simulated and with human subjects, on various scenarios that require trust: deciding if one should trust a prediction, choosing between models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and identifying why a classifier should not be trusted.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 4

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 4

polarities

background 4

representative citing papers

Variational Proximal Policy Optimization

stat.ML · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

VP2O maps PPO to SVGD in a MoE architecture using functional kernels and expert orthogonalization, claiming +179 ELO on Codeforces and 32% token reduction on AIME for a 33B/4B model.

Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations

cs.HC · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0 · 2 refs

LLM reasoning traces and post-hoc explanations increase false trust in incorrect predictions, whereas contrastive dual explanations enhance users' ability to distinguish correct from incorrect AI outputs.

Metamorphic Testing of a Deep Learning based Forecaster

cs.LG · 2019-07-13 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Developed 19 metamorphic relations to test correlation detection and LSTM forecasting in an outage prediction application, uncovering 8 unknown issues in the live system and detecting 65.9% of injected bugs via mutation testing.

IViT: A Novel Interpretable Visual Transformer for Skin Disease Detection

eess.IV · 2026-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

IViT applies quadratic programming to a pre-trained Vision Transformer with a multi-objective loss, achieving 93.80% accuracy on six skin disease datasets (0.21% below baseline) while reducing feature redundancy by 29.5% and producing clinically consistent activations.

citing papers explorer

Showing 27 of 27 citing papers.