Pith. sign in

hub Baseline reference

MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models

Baseline reference. 62% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

65 Pith papers citing it
28 external citations · Pith
Baseline 62% of classified citations
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have pushed the limits of natural language understanding and exhibited excellent problem-solving ability. Despite the great success, most existing open-source LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-2) are still far away from satisfactory for solving mathematical problem due to the complex reasoning procedures. To bridge this gap, we propose MetaMath, a fine-tuned language model that specializes in mathematical reasoning. Specifically, we start by bootstrapping mathematical questions by rewriting the question from multiple perspectives without extra knowledge, which results in a new dataset called MetaMathQA. Then we fine-tune the LLaMA-2 models on MetaMathQA. Experimental results on two popular benchmarks (i.e., GSM8K and MATH) for mathematical reasoning demonstrate that MetaMath outperforms a suite of open-source LLMs by a significant margin. Our MetaMath-7B model achieves 66.4% on GSM8K and 19.4% on MATH, exceeding the state-of-the-art models of the same size by 11.5% and 8.7%. Particularly, MetaMath-70B achieves an accuracy of 82.3% on GSM8K, slightly better than GPT-3.5-Turbo. We release all the MetaMathQA dataset, the MetaMath models with different model sizes and the training code for public use.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 4 background 3 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

EPnG: Adaptive Expert Prune-and-Grow for Parameter-Efficient MoE Fine-tuning

cs.LG · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

EPnG reallocates LoRA capacity in MoE models by pruning experts with low router gate probabilities and expanding high-importance ones via rank growth, outperforming standard LoRA and nearing full fine-tuning performance with 0.55-0.72% parameters updated.

RASFT: Rollout-Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Reasoning

cs.LG · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RASFT is an adaptive SFT method that strengthens or relaxes expert imitation per problem based on on-policy rollout solvability and adds clipped reference-policy ratio to limit drift, reporting better results than standard SFT and RL on math and code benchmarks.

Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning Language Models

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SSOPD converts intra-group correct-wrong contrast into process supervision by distilling a teacher distribution from the shortest correct completion into prefixes of the longest wrong completion, improving GRPO on AIME and HMMT benchmarks.

Can RL Teach Long-Horizon Reasoning to LLMs? Expressiveness Is Key

cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 3 refs

RL training compute for logical reasoning follows a power law with horizon depth whose exponent rises with logical expressiveness, yielding better downstream transfer when models train on richer logics.

Compress Then Adapt? No, Do It Together via Task-aware Union of Subspaces

cs.AI · 2026-05-04 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

JACTUS unifies low-rank compression and task adaptation via a task-aware union of subspaces and global rank allocation by marginal gain, outperforming 100% PEFT methods like DoRA on ViT-Base (89.2% avg) and Llama2-7B (80.9% avg) at 80% retained parameters.

TLoRA: Task-aware Low Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2026-04-20 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

TLoRA jointly optimizes LoRA initialization via task-data SVD and sensitivity-driven rank allocation, delivering stronger results than standard LoRA across NLU, reasoning, math, code, and chat tasks while using fewer trainable parameters.

Sensitivity-Positional Co-Localization in GQA Transformers

cs.CL · 2026-04-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

In Llama 3.1 8B, task-sensitive layers cluster late while RoPE adaptation is strongest early, yet applying both adaptations only to sensitivity-identified layers outperforms other layer choices by 4-16 points on MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval+, MATH, MGSM and ARC.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 65 citing papers.