arxiv: 2306.02465 · v2 · submitted 2023-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES)

Daniel J. Eisenstein , Chris Willott , Stacey Alberts , Santiago Arribas , Nina Bonaventura , Andrew J. Bunker , Alex J. Cameron , Stefano Carniani

show 70 more authors

Stephane Charlot Emma Curtis-Lake Francesco D'Eugenio Pierre Ferruit Giovanna Giardino Kevin Hainline Ryan Hausen Peter Jakobsen Benjamin D. Johnson Roberto Maiolino Bernard J. Rauscher Marcia Rieke George Rieke Hans-Walter Rix Brant Robertson Daniel P. Stark Sandro Tacchella Christina C. Williams Christopher N. A. Willmer William M. Baker Stefi Baum Rachana Bhatawdekar Kristan Boyett Zuyi Chen Jacopo Chevallard Chiara Circosta Mirko Curti A. Lola Danhaive Christa DeCoursey Ryan Endsley Anna de Graaff Alan Dressler Eiichi Egami Jakob M. Helton Raphael E. Hviding Zhiyuan Ji Gareth C. Jones Nimisha Kumari Nora L\"utzgendorf Isaac Laseter Tobias J. Looser Jianwei Lyu Michael V. Maseda Erica Nelson Eleonora Parlanti Michele Perna D\'avid Pusk\'as Tim Rawle Bruno Rodr\'iguez Del Pino Wiphu Rujopakarn Lester Sandles Aayush Saxena Jan Scholtz Katherine Sharpe Irene Shivaei Maddie S. Silcock Charlotte Simmonds Maya Skarbinski Renske Smit Meredith Stone Katherine A. Suess Fengwu Sun Mengtao Tang Michael W. Topping Hannah \"Ubler Natalia C. Villanueva Imaan E. B. Wallace Lily Whitler Joris Witstok Charity Woodrum

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords JWSTJADESGOODS fieldsgalaxy evolutionNIRCamNIRSpecdeep extragalactic surveyhigh-redshift galaxies

0 comments

The pith

JADES allocates 770 hours of JWST time to deep NIRCam imaging over 42 arcmin² and NIRSpec spectroscopy of over 5000 sources in the GOODS fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an overview of the JADES survey, an ambitious program that combines extensive near-infrared imaging with NIRCam and multi-object spectroscopy with NIRSpec in the GOODS-S and GOODS-N deep fields. It creates a deep imaging region of about 42 arcmin² with more than 100 hours of exposure across nine filters in GOODS-S, plus wider medium-depth coverage averaging 25 hours over 8-10 filters, and performs spectroscopy across multiple pointings totaling thousands of faint targets. This setup is designed to study galaxy evolution from high redshift through cosmic noon by building on the established GOODS legacy fields. A sympathetic reader would care because the resulting infrared data can reveal physical properties of distant galaxies that optical observations alone could not access.

Core claim

JADES uses about 770 hours of Cycle 1 guaranteed time largely from the NIRCam and NIRSpec instrument teams to produce a deep imaging region of roughly 42 arcmin² with over 100 hours of exposure spread over 9 NIRCam filters in GOODS-S, extended at medium depth across roughly 167 arcmin² in both GOODS fields, along with NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy in 2 deep 55-hour pointings, 14 medium pointings of about 12 hours, and 15 shallower pointings of about 4 hours targeting over 5000 HST and JWST-detected faint sources with 5 dispersers covering 0.6-5.3 microns, plus MIRI parallels providing 10 arcmin² at 43 hours exposure at 7.7 microns and larger areas at shorter mid-IR exposures.

What carries the argument

The JADES survey design, which coordinates NIRCam multi-band imaging at specified depths and areas, NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy with low-to-high resolution dispersers on thousands of pre-selected targets, and MIRI parallel observations to extend coverage redward in the GOODS-S and GOODS-N fields.

If this is right

The deep NIRCam imaging enables detection and photometric characterization of high-redshift galaxies at sensitivities beyond previous capabilities.
NIRSpec spectroscopy delivers redshifts and emission-line measurements for a large sample of faint sources across a wide redshift range.
MIRI parallels add mid-infrared data that can constrain dust content and older stellar populations in the same galaxies.
The combined dataset in the GOODS fields creates a uniform reference sample for statistical studies of galaxy evolution.
Targeting of HST and JWST pre-detected sources maximizes efficiency for follow-up on known faint objects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The survey's scale could substantially increase the number of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies at redshifts above 6 available for detailed study.
Data products may allow tighter constraints on the faint end of the luminosity function during the epoch of reionization.
Future programs could build on JADES by adding even longer exposures or additional instruments in the same pointings to create ultra-deep legacy fields.
The emphasis on guaranteed time from instrument teams illustrates how coordinated allocations can efficiently cover both imaging and spectroscopic needs in one program.

Load-bearing premise

The allocated JWST observing time, instrument performance, and scheduling will deliver the stated exposure depths, areas, and target yields without major reductions from overheads or technical issues.

What would settle it

Post-observation data showing that the deep GOODS-S imaging region received substantially less than 100 hours of integrated NIRCam exposure or that successful NIRSpec spectra were obtained for far fewer than 4000 of the targeted sources.

read the original abstract

We present an overview of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), an ambitious program of infrared imaging and spectroscopy in the GOODS-S and GOODS-N deep fields, designed to study galaxy evolution from high redshift to cosmic noon. JADES uses about 770 hours of Cycle 1 guaranteed time largely from the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) and Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) instrument teams. In GOODS-S, in and around the Hubble Ultra Deep Field and Chandra Deep Field South, JADES produces a deep imaging region of ~42 arcmin^2 with over 100 hrs of exposure time spread over 9 NIRCam filters, including two medium-band filters. This is extended at medium depth in GOODS-S and GOODS-N with NIRCam imaging of ~167 arcmin^2, averaging 25 hrs of exposure over 8-10 filters. In both fields, we conduct extensive NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy, including 2 deep pointings of 55 hrs exposure time, 14 medium pointings of ~12 hrs, and 15 shallower pointings of ~4 hrs, targeting over 5000 HST and JWST-detected faint sources with 5 low, medium, and high-resolution dispersers covering 0.6-5.3 um. Finally, JADES extends redward via coordinated parallels with the JWST Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI), featuring ~10 arcmin^2 with 43 hours of exposure at 7.7 um and thrice that area with 1.4-6.8 hours of exposure at 12.8 um and 15 um. For nearly 30 years, the GOODS-S and GOODS-N fields have been developed as the premier deep fields on the sky; JADES is now providing a compelling start on the JWST legacy in these fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a clean, factual overview of the JADES survey design that serves as a useful reference with no major issues.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this is a descriptive overview of the JADES JWST survey in the GOODS fields, detailing the exact time allocations, imaging areas, filter sets, spectroscopic setups, and target counts without any new scientific results or analysis. The paper does a solid job of documenting the program specifics. It covers the 770 hours of Cycle 1 time, the deep NIRCam imaging in GOODS-S with over 100 hours in 9 filters over 42 arcmin², the medium-depth extensions, the NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy across deep, medium, and shallow pointings with 5 dispersers targeting thousands of sources, and the MIRI parallel observations. This level of detail is useful for understanding what the survey will deliver and how it builds on the existing GOODS legacy. The approach is factual and matches the stated program design directly. There are no derivations or predictions that could introduce errors, so the soundness is high. The soft spot is minor: as a survey design paper, it doesn't include actual data or results, and it implicitly assumes the allocated time will translate to the planned depths without significant losses. That's typical and not a major concern here. This paper is for extragalactic astronomers who need a reference for the JADES parameters when planning observations or analyzing data. It provides clear value as an official description of the survey scope. It deserves serious peer review as a useful community resource. I recommend sending it through the review process.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides an overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), an ambitious Cycle 1 program using ~770 hours of guaranteed time from the NIRCam and NIRSpec teams. It details deep NIRCam imaging over ~42 arcmin² in GOODS-S (with >100 hrs exposure across 9 filters including two medium-band), medium-depth NIRCam imaging over ~167 arcmin² in both GOODS fields (averaging 25 hrs across 8-10 filters), extensive NIRSpec multi-object spectroscopy (2 deep 55-hr pointings, 14 medium ~12-hr pointings, 15 shallow ~4-hr pointings) targeting >5000 HST/JWST-detected sources with 5 dispersers spanning 0.6-5.3 μm, and coordinated MIRI parallels (~10 arcmin² at 43 hrs in 7.7 μm plus larger area at 1.4-6.8 hrs in 12.8/15 μm). The survey builds on the 30-year legacy of the GOODS-S/N fields to study galaxy evolution from high redshift to cosmic noon.

Significance. If executed as described, JADES will deliver a foundational JWST legacy dataset in the premier GOODS deep fields, enabling detailed studies of faint high-redshift galaxies through combined deep multi-band imaging and extensive spectroscopy. The paper's direct reporting of approved program parameters (time allocations, areas, filters, dispersers, and target yields) serves as a clear community reference without introducing derived claims or fitting procedures. This factual grounding strengthens its utility for planning complementary observations and analyses.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'over 100 hrs of exposure time spread over 9 NIRCam filters' could be clarified by specifying whether the total is integrated or per-filter to avoid ambiguity for readers planning follow-up work.
[Survey Design] The description of NIRSpec pointings and target counts would benefit from an explicit cross-reference to the observing program ID or proposal number for traceability to the official JWST archive.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The review accurately summarizes the scope of the JADES overview paper, which is intended solely as a factual description of the approved Cycle 1 program parameters, areas, filters, dispersers, and target yields to serve as a community reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Descriptive survey overview with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The paper is a factual overview of the JADES survey design, reporting allocated Cycle 1 time (~770 hours), imaging areas (~42 arcmin² deep, ~167 arcmin² medium), exposure times, filter sets, NIRSpec pointings, target counts (>5000 sources), and MIRI parallels as program parameters. No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or derivation chains exist. All quantitative claims are presented as direct statements of the observing program rather than results derived from internal models or self-citations. The content is self-contained against external program facts and contains no load-bearing steps that reduce to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a purely descriptive survey overview paper with no mathematical derivations, physical models, or quantitative predictions; therefore it introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6038 in / 1317 out tokens · 76410 ms · 2026-05-16T14:28:11.923827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Intense and extended CIII] emission suggests a strong outflow in JADES-GS-z14-0
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Extended CIII] emission offset from the stars in a z=14.18 galaxy indicates outflows with mass outflow rate ~160 solar masses per year and mass-loading factor 4-15, constraining star-formation efficiency to below 0.08.
Expanding the High-z Supernova Frontier: "Wide-Area" JWST Discoveries from the First Two Years of COSMOS-Web
astro-ph.HE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

JWST difference imaging from COSMOS-Web and PRIMER has yielded 68 high-redshift supernovae including a core-collapse event at z>3 and a Type Ia at z>2, demonstrating the feasibility of wide-area time-domain searches i...
Tracing nitrogen enrichment across cosmic time with JWST
astro-ph.GA 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

Galaxies at z>1 show N/O ratios elevated by a median 0.18 dex at fixed O/H relative to local trends, reaching 0.4-0.5 dex at low metallicity.
Kinematic Stratification in Extremely Red Quasars Revealed by JWST
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST observations of ERQs show stratified gas kinematics via deblended optical emission lines, with UV lines dominated by scattered light and optical lines mixing scattered and obscured emission.
Using Ly$\alpha$ Transmitted Spectrum to Probe IGM Transmission and Identify Ionized Structures in Cosmic Reionization
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

JWST spectra of galaxies reveal a ~110 cMpc ionized bubble at z~6 with IGM transmission 0.17, an order of magnitude above average, linked to a galaxy overdensity.
Diffusion-based Galaxy Simulations for the Roman High Latitude Survey
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A denoising diffusion model trained on transformed JWST observations generates multi-band galaxy images that match key statistical properties of real galaxies for Roman weak lensing simulations.
SPURS: Bursty Star Formation in an Extremely Luminous Weak Emission Line Galaxy at $z=9.3$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A massive galaxy at z=9.3 shows bursty star formation with a recent downturn and sits in a small ionized bubble in a neutral IGM.
SAGUI: SED-based Segmentation of Multi-band Galaxy Images -- Application to JADES in GOODS-South
astro-ph.IM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

SAGUI introduces a two-stage segmentation framework for multi-band galaxy images that combines starlet decomposition, spectral similarity analysis, and copula statistics to identify structures and recover low-surface-...
NOEMA3D: Resolving radial gas flows in disk galaxies at z~1.1-1.6 with high-resolution CO observations
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

High-resolution molecular gas observations show that spiral arms and bars in z~1.5 disk galaxies drive substantial radial inflows at rates matching star formation, linking morphology directly to gas transport.
BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. III. Constraints on the UV LF and the Clustering of z~7-14 Galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

New JWST pure-parallel imaging over 400 arcmin² yields UV luminosity functions at z~7.5-10 consistent with pre-JWST models and significant clustering of bright galaxies implying they occupy more massive halos than pre...
Paschen Jumps in Little Red Dots: Evidence for Nebular Continua
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Paschen jumps in Little Red Dots indicate their continua originate from free-bound recombination emission in low-temperature nebular gas rather than thermalized or AGN components.
The Way We Tally Becomes the Tale: the Impact of Selection Strategies on the Inferred Evolution of Little Red Dots Across Cosmic Time
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Wider selection criteria for Little Red Dots in JWST fields reveal that classic extreme color cuts miss most of the population and bias demographic trends.
Winding Back the Clock: Recent Star Formation Histories of Massive Quiescent Galaxies Are Consistent With Their Rapid Number Density Evolution Since $\mathbf{z\sim7}$
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

Star formation histories inferred for z=2-5 massive quiescent galaxies imply past number densities that align with observed rapid evolution since z~7.
Connecting the Dots: UV-Bright Companions of Little Red Dots as Lyman-Werner Sources Enabling Direct Collapse Black Hole Formation
astro-ph.GA 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

UV-bright companions to Little Red Dots provide Lyman-Werner fluxes of J21 ~ 10^2.5-10^5 that can suppress H2 cooling and enable direct collapse to massive black holes.
Impact of stellar population models on the estimated physical properties of galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

Switching between four common stellar population synthesis models produces systematic offsets of up to 0.6 dex in stellar mass and 0.4 dex in star formation rate for the same galaxies.
Stellar feedback SPICEs up [C II] emission in the first galaxies
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Simulations find [C II] traces star formation robustly but underestimates outflow speeds and mass-loading factors by factors of 2-5, with feedback type affecting disk settling but not distinguishable from [C II] spati...
Transition from Outside-in to Inside-Out at $z\sim 2$: Evidence from Radial Profiles of Specific Star Formation Rate based on JWST/HST
astro-ph.GA 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Star-forming galaxies show a transition from negative to positive sSFR radial gradients around z~2, implying a change from outside-in to inside-out growth.
Towards Reconciling Reionization with JWST: The Role of Bright Galaxies and Strong Feedback
astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Strong-feedback models with bright galaxies match JWST UVLF at z greater than or equal to 10 and predict an extended reionization from z approximately 16 to 6 that fits CMB optical depth within 2 sigma.
High-Redshift Gravitational Lens Discoveries in JWST NIRCam Using AnomalyMatch
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

AnomalyMatch applied to JWST data identified 58 gravitational lenses, 37 new, graded by experts and spanning redshifts to zphot ~2.1.
Prospects for Observing Galaxy Spectral Energy Distribution from the Radio to the far-Infrared in the Era of Next-Generation Radio Telescopes
astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Simulations predict ngVLA at 100 GHz can detect galaxies above 10^9 solar masses at any redshift while SKA low frequencies reach massive dusty galaxies to z=5-7.
The case for super-Eddington accretion in JWST broad-line AGN during the first billion years
astro-ph.HE 2024-09

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · cited by 21 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

[1]

B., Casey, C

Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Allen, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 61

work page 2023
[2]

2022, Universe, 8, 554

Alberts, S., & Noble, A. 2022, Universe, 8, 554

work page 2022
[3]

H., Jagannathan, P., & Nyland, K

Alberts, S., Rujopakarn, W., Rieke, G. H., Jagannathan, P., & Nyland, K. 2020, ApJ, 901, 168

work page 2020
[4]

2024, ApJ, 976, 224

Alberts, S., Lyu, J., Shivaei, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 224

work page 2024
[5]

Algera, H. S. B., Inami, H., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6142 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 707

work page 2023
[6]

B., Finkelstein, S

Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L12

work page 2023
[7]

M., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B

Baker, W. M., Tacchella, S., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 141

work page 2025
[8]

A., Weibel, A., et al

Barrufet, L., Oesch, P. A., Weibel, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 449

work page 2023
[9]

A., Marques-Chaves, R., et al

Barrufet, L., Oesch, P. A., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3453

work page 2025
[10]

Beckwith, S. V. W., Stiavelli, M., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1729

work page 2006
[11]

M., Giardino, G., Sirianni, M., et al

Birkmann, S. M., Giardino, G., Sirianni, M., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12180, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. L. E. Coyle, S. Matsuura, & M. D. Perrin, 121802P B¨ oker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001

work page 2022
[12]

2023, A&A, 672, A40

Giardino, G. 2023, A&A, 672, A40

work page 2023
[13]

2023, MNRAS, arXiv:2212.06683

Bouwens, R., Illingworth, G., Oesch, P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, arXiv:2212.06683

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

J., Illingworth, G

Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2010, ApJL, 709, L133

work page 2010
[15]

J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

work page 2023
[16]

J., Cameron, A

Bunker, A. J., Cameron, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A288

work page 2024
[17]

J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A

Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A115

work page 2023
[18]

C., McLeod, D

Carnall, A. C., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 3974

work page 2023
[19]

2024, Nature, 633, 318

Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318

work page 2024
[20]

2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415

Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415

work page 2016
[21]

2019, MNRAS, 483, 2621

Chevallard, J., Curtis-Lake, E., Charlot, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2621

work page 2019
[22]

2013, ApJ, 762, 32

Coe, D., Zitrin, A., Carrasco, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 32

work page 2013
[23]

2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., Carniani, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 425

work page 2023
[24]

2023, Nature Astronomy, arXiv:2212.04568 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al

Curtis-Lake, E., Carniani, S., Cameron, A., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, arXiv:2212.04568 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A87

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

DeCoursey, C., Egami, E., Pierel, J. D. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 250 D’Eugenio, F., Cameron, A. J., Scholtz, J., et al. 2025, ApJS, 277, 4

work page 2025
[26]

J., Lang, D., et al

Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

work page 2019
[27]

T., McLeod, D

Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011

work page 2023
[28]

2016, A&A, 592, A113

Dorner, B., Giardino, G., Ferruit, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A113

work page 2016
[29]

2023, PASP, in press

Doyon, R., Hutchings, J., Willott, C., & et al. 2023, PASP, in press

work page 2023
[30]

2023, ApJL, 947, L27

Dressler, A., Vulcani, B., Treu, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L27

work page 2023
[31]

S., McLure, R

Dunlop, J. S., McLure, R. J., Biggs, A. D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 861

work page 2017
[32]

J., Johnson, B

Eisenstein, D. J., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12340

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

S., McLure, R

Ellis, R. S., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJL, 763, L7

work page 2013
[34]

P., Whitler, L., et al

Endsley, R., Stark, D. P., Whitler, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2312 —. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1111

work page 2023
[35]

Fan, X., Ba˜ nados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 373

work page 2023
[36]

C., Dickinson, M., & Williams, R

Ferguson, H. C., Dickinson, M., & Williams, R. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 667

work page 2000
[37]

J., et al

Ferreira, L., Adams, N., Conselice, C. J., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L2

work page 2022
[38]

J., Sazonova, E., et al

Ferreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Sazonova, E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 94

work page 2023
[39]

2022, A&A, 661, A81

Ferruit, P., Jakobsen, P., Giardino, G., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A81

work page 2022
[40]

2010, ApJL, 725, L205

Fontana, A., Vanzella, E., Pentericci, L., et al. 2010, ApJL, 725, L205

work page 2010
[41]

2018, A&A, 620, A152

Franco, M., Elbaz, D., B´ ethermin, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A152

work page 2018
[42]

A., Schouws, S., et al

Fudamoto, Y., Oesch, P. A., Schouws, S., et al. 2021, Nature, 597, 489

work page 2021
[43]

L., Burgarella, D., et al

Fujimoto, S., Finkelstein, S. L., Burgarella, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 130

work page 2023
[44]

J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al

Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 142 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1 34 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1

work page 2023
[45]

P., Mather, J

Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Abbott, R., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 068001

work page 2023
[46]

2002, ApJS, 139, 369

Giacconi, R., Zirm, A., Wang, J., et al. 2002, ApJS, 139, 369

work page 2002
[47]

2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

Giardino, G., Ferruit, P., Chevallard, J., et al. 2019, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 523, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, ed. P. J. Teuben, M. W. Pound, B. A. Thomas, & E. M. Warner, 645

work page 2019
[48]

C., Koekemoer, A

Giavalisco, M., Ferguson, H. C., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 600, L93 G´ omez-Guijarro, C., Magnelli, B., Elbaz, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A34

work page 2004
[49]

A., Kocevski, D

Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 35

work page 2011
[50]

N., Johnson, B

Hainline, K. N., Johnson, B. D., Robertson, B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 71

work page 2024
[51]

2023, ApJ, 959, 39

Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39

work page 2023
[52]

2018, PASJ, 70, 105

Hatsukade, B., Kohno, K., Yamaguchi, Y., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 105

work page 2018
[53]

Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. 2022, Astronomy and Computing, 39, 100586

work page 2022
[54]

M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al

Helton, J. M., Sun, F., Woodrum, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 124

work page 2024
[55]

M., Alberts, S., Rieke, G

Helton, J. M., Alberts, S., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.02099

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Y.-Y., Abdurro’uf, Coe, D., et al

Hsiao, T. Y.-Y., Abdurro’uf, Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 8

work page 2024
[57]

G., Angeloudi, E., et al

Huertas-Company, M., Iyer, K. G., Angeloudi, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A48

work page 2024
[58]

The Hubble Legacy Fields (HLF-GOODS-S) v1.5 Data Products: Combining 2442 Orbits of GOODS-S/CDF-S Region ACS and WFC3/IR Images

Illingworth, G., Magee, D., Bouwens, R., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1606.00841

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[59]

D., Magee, D., Oesch, P

Illingworth, G. D., Magee, D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2013, ApJS, 209, 6

work page 2013
[60]

2023, ApJL, 948, L13

Jacobs, C., Glazebrook, K., Calabr` o, A., et al. 2023, ApJL, 948, L13

work page 2023
[61]

2022, A&A, 661, A80

Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80

work page 2022
[62]

C., Tacchella, S., et al

Ji, Z., Williams, C. C., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 135

work page 2024
[63]

C., Bunker, A

Jones, G. C., Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A238

work page 2024
[64]

L., Arrabal Haro, P., et al

Jung, I., Finkelstein, S. L., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 73

work page 2024
[65]

S., Rose, C., Vanderhoof, B

Kartaltepe, J. S., Rose, C., Vanderhoof, B. N., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L15

work page 2023
[66]

J., Matthee, J., et al

Kashino, D., Lilly, S. J., Matthee, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 66

work page 2023
[67]

D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4

work page 2023
[68]

M., Faber, S

Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 36

work page 2011
[69]

2022, ApJS, 263, 38 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al

Kokorev, V., Brammer, G., Fujimoto, S., et al. 2022, ApJS, 263, 38 Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266

work page 2022
[70]

L., Finkelstein, S

Larson, R. L., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 953, L29

work page 2023
[71]

A., Hutter, A., et al

Lu, T.-Y., Mason, C. A., Hutter, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 4872

work page 2024
[72]

E., Brandt, W

Luo, B., Bauer, F. E., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2008, ApJS, 179, 19

work page 2008
[73]

2023, A&A, 678, A83

Magnelli, B., G´ omez-Guijarro, C., Elbaz, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A83

work page 2023
[74]

2023, A&A, 672, A155

Mascia, S., Pentericci, L., Calabr` o, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A155

work page 2023
[75]

A., Treu, T., Dijkstra, M., et al

Mason, C. A., Treu, T., Dijkstra, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 2

work page 2018
[76]

A., et al

Matthee, J., Mackenzie, R., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 67

work page 2023
[77]

P., Brammer, G., et al

Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

work page 2024
[78]

M., Cooper, O

McKinney, J., Manning, S. M., Cooper, O. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 72

work page 2023
[79]

2023, ApJL, 947, L24

Morishita, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L24

work page 2023
[80]

A., Kreilgaard, K

Morishita, T., Mason, C. A., Kreilgaard, K. C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 152

work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.