pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.01962 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-03 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Curvature Perturbations from First-Order Phase Transitions: Implications to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 01:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords first-order phase transitionsprimordial black holesgravitational wavesgauge dependencepulsar timing arraycosmological perturbationscurvature perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Covariant treatment shows strong suppression of black hole and gravitational wave signals from first-order phase transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies curvature perturbations generated during first-order phase transitions in the early universe. It applies a fully covariant formalism that exposes gauge dependencies missed by earlier non-covariant calculations. This reveals that previous estimates overstated both the abundance of primordial black holes and the amplitude of scalar-induced gravitational waves. Accounting for the gauge issues produces strong suppression of both signals. The result directly affects whether first-order phase transitions can explain the stochastic background reported by pulsar timing arrays.

Core claim

A fully covariant formalism applied to cosmological perturbations during strong first-order phase transitions demonstrates that non-covariant treatments overestimate both primordial black hole formation and scalar-induced gravitational waves; once gauge dependencies are removed, both signals are strongly suppressed, carrying direct implications for the first-order phase transition interpretation of the pulsar timing array signal.

What carries the argument

The fully covariant formalism for cosmological perturbations, which removes gauge artifacts from curvature calculations during first-order phase transitions.

If this is right

  • Primordial black holes form at much lower rates during first-order phase transitions than non-covariant models predicted.
  • Scalar-induced gravitational waves from these transitions have substantially lower amplitudes.
  • Any first-order phase transition explanation of the pulsar timing array signal must incorporate the reduced strength after gauge correction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar gauge issues may affect other early-universe observables calculated without a covariant treatment.
  • Future numerical simulations of phase transitions should adopt covariant perturbation methods to produce reliable signal forecasts.
  • Observational upper limits on primordial black holes or gravitational waves can now be compared against the lower expected rates from phase transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The covariant formalism removes every gauge artifact without adding new modeling uncertainties or extra assumptions about bubble dynamics.

What would settle it

A confirmed pulsar timing array signal whose amplitude matches non-covariant first-order phase transition predictions but exceeds the suppressed covariant prediction would falsify the suppression result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.01962 by Gabriele Franciolini, Ryusuke Jinno, Yann Gouttenoire.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution of the GI curvature perturbation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Probability distribution of the density contrast in the co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SIGW contribution to the GWs from FOPT. The solid line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding whether primordial black holes form during strong first-order phase transition (FOPT) is a crucial open question in cosmology. We address this using a fully covariant formalism to study cosmological perturbations, highlighting previously overlooked gauge dependencies. We show that non-covariant treatments can overestimate primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves. Once gauge dependencies are accounted for, both signals are strongly suppressed, with direct implications for the FOPT interpretation of the Pulsar Timing Array signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a fully covariant formalism for cosmological perturbations during first-order phase transitions reveals gauge dependencies overlooked in prior non-covariant treatments. These dependencies cause overestimation of primordial black hole (PBH) formation and scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGW). Once accounted for, both signals are strongly suppressed, with direct implications for ruling out a first-order phase transition (FOPT) origin for the Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) signal.

Significance. If the result holds, the work would be significant for early-universe cosmology and gravitational-wave phenomenology. It would substantially weaken the case for FOPT as a source of observable PBH or the PTA background, redirecting attention to alternative mechanisms. The covariant approach, if rigorously implemented, would represent a methodological advance in handling gauge artifacts in phase-transition perturbation calculations.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the suppression result but provides no indication of the specific phase-transition parameters, bubble-wall velocity, or transition strength used to reach the 'strongly suppressed' conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and summary of our manuscript. The referee correctly identifies the central claim: a covariant treatment of curvature perturbations during first-order phase transitions exposes gauge artifacts in earlier non-covariant calculations, resulting in strong suppression of both primordial black hole formation and scalar-induced gravitational waves. We agree that this has significant implications for the interpretation of the PTA signal. Below we respond to the major comments; none were listed in the report provided, so we have no point-by-point replies. We are happy to address any additional questions the referee may raise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract contains no equations, derivations, or explicit modeling steps that could be inspected for self-definition, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. Without access to the manuscript's specific equations or cited prior results in the derivation chain, no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction can be exhibited. The central claim rests on the application of a covariant formalism, but absent any quoted technical steps, the derivation chain cannot be shown to collapse into its own assumptions. This is the expected outcome when source material supplies no load-bearing technical content to analyze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 940 out tokens · 42675 ms · 2026-05-23T01:16:29.583268+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Reheating: The Scalar-Induced Component

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Accounting for the minimal mass spread of primordial black holes from gravitational collapse suppresses the Poltergeist GW background to the level of generic scalar-induced signals and reopens ultra-light PBH parameter space.

  2. Reviving primordial black hole formation in slow first-order phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Primordial black hole formation from slow first-order phase transitions remains viable if slow reheating after supercooling creates an early matter-dominated era allowing small overdensities to grow, producing black h...

  3. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  4. Reviving primordial black hole formation in slow first-order phase transitions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Slow reheating after a supercooled first-order phase transition allows an early matter-dominated era in which small curvature perturbations grow sufficiently to form primordial black holes.

  5. Phenomenology of Vector Dark Matter produced by a First Order Phase Transition

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dark sector first-order phase transitions near 10 MeV can substantially modify vector dark matter relic densities away from standard thermal freeze-out predictions, with distinct mass windows and calculable gravitatio...

  6. Thermodynamical uncertainties for primordial black holes from cosmological phase transitions

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A state-of-the-art thermodynamic analysis of supercooled phase transitions yields a universal lower bound β/H_* ≃ 5 and shows that viable PBH dark-matter parameter space in classically conformal gauge-Higgs theories i...

  7. Primordial black holes and magnetic fields in conformal neutrino mass models

    hep-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Conformal U(1)' seesaw models produce PBHs contributing to dark matter and helical magnetic fields at seesaw scales of 10^4-10^11 GeV, with observable GW, microlensing, and Hawking signals at LISA, Roman, and future g...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 104 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    or Refs. [52–56]. In the spatially-flat gauge, constant-time hypersurfaces are flat ds2 η=const. = −a2dx2. This is particularly convenient since by plugging Eq. (7) into Eq. (5), we get a perturbation equation δ˜ρ(F )′ R,k + 4Hδ˜ρ(F ) R,k = −δ˜ρ(F )′ V,k + 4 3 ρR k2 ˜Vk, (11) which coincides with the background equation in Eq. (3) in the super-Hubble limi...

  2. [2]

    D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, Macroscopic Consequences of the Weinberg Model, Phys. Lett. B 42 (1972) 471–474

  3. [3]

    Gouttenoire,Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail

    Y . Gouttenoire,Beyond the Standard Model Cocktail. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham, 2022, 10.1007/978-3-031-11862-3

  4. [4]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001, [1512.06239]

  5. [5]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [1910.13125]

  6. [6]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki and K. Sato, Abundance of Primordial Holes Produced by Cosmological First Order Phase Transition, Prog. Theor. Phys.68 (1982) 1979

  7. [7]

    S. D. H. Hsu, Black Holes From Extended Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 251 (1990) 343–348

  8. [8]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black hole production during first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L021303, [2106.05637]

  9. [9]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura and T. Takahashi, Primordial black holes as a probe of strongly first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137261, [2111.13099]

  10. [10]

    T. H. Jung and T. Okui, Primordial black holes from bubble collisions during a first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 115014, [2110.04271]

  11. [11]

    Kawana, T

    K. Kawana, T. Kim and P. Lu, PBH formation from overdensities in delayed vacuum transitions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 103531, [2212.14037]

  12. [12]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V . Vaskonen,Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions, JHEP 09 (2023) 092, [2305.04924]

  13. [13]

    Gouttenoire and T

    Y . Gouttenoire and T. V olansky,Primordial black holes from supercooled phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 043514, [2305.04942]

  14. [14]

    Baldes and M

    I. Baldes and M. O. Olea-Romacho, Primordial black holes as dark matter: interferometric tests of phase transition origin, JHEP 01 (2024) 133, [2307.11639]

  15. [15]

    Gouttenoire, Phys

    Y . Gouttenoire,First-Order Phase Transition Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consistent with Solar-Mass Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 171404, [2307.04239]

  16. [16]

    Salvio, JCAP 12, 046 (2023), arXiv:2307.04694 [hep- ph]

    A. Salvio, Supercooling in radiative symmetry breaking: theory extensions, gravitational wave detection and primordial black holes, JCAP 12 (2023) 046, [2307.04694]

  17. [17]

    Gouttenoire, Phys

    Y . Gouttenoire,Primordial black holes from conformal Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138800, [2311.13640]

  18. [18]

    Jinno, J

    R. Jinno, J. Kume and M. Yamada, Super-slow phase transition catalyzed by BHs and the birth of baby BHs, Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138465, [2310.06901]

  19. [19]

    I. K. Banerjee and U. K. Dey, Spinning primordial black holes from first order phase transition, JHEP 07 (2024) 006, [2311.03406]

  20. [20]

    M. M. Flores, A. Kusenko and M. Sasaki, Revisiting formation of primordial black holes in a supercooled first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 015005, [2402.13341]

  21. [21]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V . Vaskonen,Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Slow First-Order Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 221003, [2402.04158]

  22. [22]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V . Vaskonen,Black holes and gravitational waves from phase transitions in realistic models, 2412.10366

  23. [23]

    W.-Y . Ai, L. Heurtier and T. H. Jung,Primordial black holes from an interrupted phase transition, 2409.02175

  24. [24]

    Conaci, L

    A. Conaci, L. Delle Rose, P. S. B. Dev and A. Ghoshal, Slaying axion-like particles via gravitational waves and primordial black holes from supercooled phase transition, JHEP 12 (2024) 196, [2401.09411]

  25. [25]

    Kanemura, M

    S. Kanemura, M. Tanaka and K.-P. Xie, Primordial black holes from slow phase transitions: a model-building perspective, JHEP 06 (2024) 036, [2404.00646]

  26. [26]

    I. K. Banerjee, F. Rescigno and A. Salvio, Primordial Black Holes (as Dark Matter) from the Supercooled Phase Transitions with Radiative Symmetry Breaking, 2412.06889

  27. [27]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, T. Takahashi, M. Tanaka and C.-M. Yoo, Super-critical primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order electroweak phase transition, 2501.11040

  28. [28]

    Murai, K

    K. Murai, K. Sakurai and F. Takahashi, Primordial Black Hole Formation via Inverted Bubble Collapse, 2502.02291

  29. [29]

    J. Zou, Z. Zhu, Z. Zhao and L. Bian, Numerical simulations of density perturbation and gravitational wave production from cosmological first-order phase transition, 2502.20166

  30. [30]

    Ghoshal, E

    A. Ghoshal, E. Megias, G. Nardini and M. Quiros, Complementary Probes of Warped Extra Dimension: Colliders, Gravitational Waves and Primordial Black Holes from Phase Transitions, 2502.03588. 6

  31. [31]

    Byrnes, G

    C. Byrnes, G. Franciolini, T. Harada, P. Pani and M. Sasaki, eds., Primordial Black Holes. Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology. Springer, 3, 2025

  32. [32]

    Sasaki, H

    M. Sasaki, H. Kodama and K. Sato, GENERATION OF COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS BY A FIRST ORDER PHASE TRANSITION, Prog. Theor. Phys.68 (1982) 1561–1573

  33. [33]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo and S.-J. Wang, Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions with Curvature Perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 051001, [2208.14086]

  34. [34]

    Giombi and M

    L. Giombi and M. Hindmarsh, General relativistic bubble growth in cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 03 (2024) 059, [2307.12080]

  35. [35]

    G. Elor, R. Jinno, S. Kumar, R. McGehee and Y . Tsai,Finite Bubble Statistics Constrain Late Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 211003, [2311.16222]

  36. [36]

    M. R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez and M. J. Weikert, Dark radiation isocurvature from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 07 (2024) 031, [2402.13309]

  37. [37]

    Cai, Y.-S

    R.-G. Cai, Y .-S. Hao and S.-J. Wang,Primordial black holes and curvature perturbations from false vacuum islands, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 290411, [2404.06506]

  38. [38]

    Jinno and J

    R. Jinno and J. Kume, Gravitational effects on fluid dynamics in cosmological first-order phase transitions, JCAP 02 (2025) 057, [2408.10770]

  39. [39]

    Tomita, Evolution of Irregularities in a Chaotic Early Universe, Prog

    K. Tomita, Evolution of Irregularities in a Chaotic Early Universe, Prog. Theor. Phys.54 (1975) 730

  40. [40]

    Matarrese, O

    S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. Saez, A General relativistic approach to the nonlinear evolution of collisionless matter, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1311–1323

  41. [41]

    General Relativistic Dynamics of Irrotational Dust: Cosmological Implications

    S. Matarrese, O. Pantano and D. Saez, General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 320–323, [astro-ph/9310036]

  42. [42]

    Relativistic second-order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter Universe

    S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach and M. Bruni, Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 043504, [astro-ph/9707278]

  43. [43]

    Second-Order Cosmological Perturbations from Inflation

    V . Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Second order cosmological perturbations from inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 119–148, [astro-ph/0209156]

  44. [44]

    CMB polarization from secondary vector and tensor modes

    S. Mollerach, D. Harari and S. Matarrese, CMB polarization from secondary vector and tensor modes, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 063002, [astro-ph/0310711]

  45. [45]

    Unified treatment of cosmological perturbations from super-horizon to small scales

    C. Carbone and S. Matarrese, A Unified treatment of cosmological perturbations from super-horizon to small scales, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 043508, [astro-ph/0407611]

  46. [46]

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson and D. Wands, The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 123518, [gr-qc/0612013]

  47. [47]

    Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki, Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 084019, [hep-th/0703290]

  48. [48]

    J. R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto, A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves, JCAP 09 (2018) 012, [1804.07732]

  49. [49]

    Semianalytic Calculation of Gravitational Wave Spectrum Nonlinearly Induced from Primordial Curvature Perturbations

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123532, [1804.08577]

  50. [50]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves review

    G. Dom `enech, Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review, Universe 7 (2021) 398, [2109.01398]

  51. [51]

    J. M. Bardeen, Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

  52. [52]

    Franciolini, Y

    G. Franciolini, Y . Gouttenoire and R. Jinno,In preparation,

  53. [53]

    Kodama and M

    H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.78 (1984) 1–166

  54. [54]

    V . F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman and R. H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part

  55. [55]

    Extensions, Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

  56. [56]

    Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology

    V . Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005, 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

  57. [57]

    Baumann, Cosmology

    D. Baumann, Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2022, 10.1017/9781108937092

  58. [58]

    Peter and J.-P

    P. Peter and J.-P. Uzan, Primordial Cosmology. Oxford Graduate Texts. Oxford University Press, 2, 2013

  59. [59]

    A new approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales

    D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle, A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043527, [astro-ph/0003278]

  60. [60]

    Y . B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov,The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded during Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model, Sov. Astron. 10 (1967) 602

  61. [61]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152 (1971) 75

  62. [62]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399–415

  63. [63]

    B. J. Carr, The Primordial black hole mass spectrum, Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 1–19

  64. [64]

    G. F. Chapline, Cosmological effects of primordial black holes, Nature 253 (1975) 251–252

  65. [65]

    Escriv `a, PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review, Universe 8 (2022) 66, [2111.12693]

    A. Escriv `a, PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review, Universe 8 (2022) 66, [2111.12693]

  66. [66]

    Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki, Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 084002, [gr-qc/9905064]

  67. [67]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo and Y . Koga,Revisiting compaction functions for primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043515, [2304.13284]

  68. [68]

    Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological pertur- bations, Phys

    I. Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123524, [1809.02127]

  69. [69]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv `a, C. Germani and R. K. Sheth, Universal threshold for primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 044022, [1907.13311]

  70. [70]

    Cosmological long-wavelength solutions and primordial black hole formation

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, T. Nakama and Y . Koga,Cosmological long-wavelength solutions and primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 084057, [1503.03934]

  71. [71]

    Musco, V

    I. Musco, V . De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto,Threshold for primordial black holes. II. A simple analytic prescription, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063538, [2011.03014]

  72. [72]

    M. W. Choptuik, Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 9–12

  73. [73]

    C. R. Evans and J. S. Coleman, Observation of critical phenomena and selfsimilarity in the gravitational collapse of radiation fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 1782–1785, [gr-qc/9402041]

  74. [74]

    J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Near-critical gravitational 7 collapse and the initial mass function of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5481–5484, [astro-ph/9709072]

  75. [75]

    Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity

    I. Musco and J. C. Miller, Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 145009, [1201.2379]

  76. [76]

    De Luca, G

    V . De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, M. Peloso, A. Riotto and C. ¨Unal, The Ineludible non-Gaussianity of the Primordial Black Hole Abundance, JCAP 07 (2019) 048, [1904.00970]

  77. [77]

    Young, I

    S. Young, I. Musco and C. T. Byrnes, Primordial black hole formation and abundance: contribution from the non-linear relation between the density and curvature perturbation, JCAP 11 (2019) 012, [1904.00984]

  78. [78]

    Jinno and M

    R. Jinno and M. Takimoto, Gravitational waves from bubble dynamics: Beyond the Envelope, JCAP 01 (2019) 060, [1707.03111]

  79. [79]

    Gravitational radiation from a bulk flow model

    T. Konstandin, Gravitational radiation from a bulk flow model, JCAP 03 (2018) 047, [1712.06869]

  80. [80]

    Baldes, M

    I. Baldes, M. Dichtl, Y . Gouttenoire and F. Sala,Particle shells from relativistic bubble walls, JHEP 07 (2024) 231, [2403.05615]

Showing first 80 references.