pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.07862 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-10 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc· hep-ph

Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Waveforms

Mikhail M. Ivanov , Yue-Zhou Li , Julio Parra-Martinez , Zihan Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph
keywords gravitational wavesmultipole momentsanomalous dimensionseffective field theoryblack holeswaveform tailsphase shifts
0
0 comments X

The pith

A formula gives the universal anomalous scaling of multipole moments for any gravitating source in classical general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a formula for how multipole moments of gravitating sources scale anomalously in general relativity. The derivation uses effective field theory to connect the scaling to phase shifts in gravitational wave scattering off the source. For black holes this scaling matches the renormalized angular momentum from perturbation theory. Because the point-particle description is universal, the same anomalous scaling holds for black holes, neutron stars, and binary systems. The result enables a new resummation of logarithmic tails in binary gravitational waveforms.

Core claim

The total multipole scaling dimension is identified as the renormalized angular momentum of black hole perturbation theory, and more generally the anomalous dimension is determined by phase shifts of gravitational waves elastically scattering off generic source multipole moments, allowing extraction of a universal part identical for any compact object.

What carries the argument

The anomalous dimension of multipole moments, fixed by the phase shifts of scattered gravitational waves.

If this is right

  • The scaling dimension for black holes equals their renormalized angular momentum.
  • A resummation of universal short-distance logarithms in binary system waveforms follows directly.
  • The same universal anomalous dimension applies to neutron stars and binaries as to black holes.
  • Modeling of gravitational wave signals may improve for current and future experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might connect classical gravity tails to renormalization group flows in other field theories.
  • Extensions could apply the scattering method to compute higher-order corrections in the multipole expansion.
  • The resummation could be tested against numerical relativity simulations of binary mergers.

Load-bearing premise

Compact gravitating systems admit a universal point-particle effective description that isolates the same anomalous dimension for all objects.

What would settle it

Computing the anomalous dimension for a specific neutron star configuration and finding it differs from the black hole result would falsify the universality of the extracted part.

read the original abstract

We present a formula for the universal anomalous scaling of the multipole moments of a generic gravitating source in classical general relativity. We derive this formula in two independent ways using effective field theory methods. First, we use the absorption of low frequency gravitational waves by a black hole to identify the total multipole scaling dimension as the renormalized angular momentum of black hole perturbation theory. More generally, we show that the anomalous dimension is determined by phase shifts of gravitational waves elastically scattering off generic source multipole moments, which reproduces the renormalized angular momentum in the particular case of black holes. The effective field theory approach thus clarifies the role of the renormalized angular momentum in the multipole expansion. The universality of the point-particle effective description of compact gravitating systems further allows us to extract the universal part of the anomalous dimension, which is the same for any object, including black holes, neutron stars, and binary systems. As an application, we propose a novel resummation of the universal short-distance logarithms (``tails'') in the gravitational waveform of binary systems, which may improve the modeling of signals from current and future gravitational wave experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present a formula for the universal anomalous scaling of the multipole moments of a generic gravitating source in classical general relativity. It derives this formula in two independent ways using effective field theory methods. First, it uses the absorption of low frequency gravitational waves by a black hole to identify the total multipole scaling dimension as the renormalized angular momentum of black hole perturbation theory. More generally, it shows that the anomalous dimension is determined by phase shifts of gravitational waves elastically scattering off generic source multipole moments, which reproduces the renormalized angular momentum in the particular case of black holes. The universality of the point-particle effective description of compact gravitating systems further allows extraction of the universal part of the anomalous dimension, which is the same for any object, including black holes, neutron stars, and binary systems. As an application, it proposes a novel resummation of the universal short-distance logarithms (tails) in the gravitational waveform of binary systems.

Significance. If the derivations are independent and the universality holds without residual structure-dependent terms, the result would provide a useful resummation technique for universal tails in binary gravitational waveforms, with potential benefits for modeling signals in current and future detectors. The dual EFT derivations and explicit connection to renormalized angular momentum represent strengths if rigorously established.

major comments (2)
  1. [phase-shift derivation and point-particle matching] In the phase-shift derivation for generic multipole sources, the subsequent matching to the point-particle limit does not explicitly demonstrate that all object-dependent finite pieces cancel in the UV renormalization of the multipole operators; this cancellation is load-bearing for the universality claim that the anomalous dimension is identical for black holes, neutron stars, and binaries.
  2. [universality via point-particle EFT] The universality step asserts that the point-particle EFT isolates a structure-independent contribution at the order relevant for the tails, but the manuscript does not show that internal-structure contributions to multipole renormalization either vanish or are fully absorbed into non-universal counterterms; without this, the central claim that the universal part is the same for any compact object remains at risk.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and introduction] The abstract states the two derivations are independent, but the text should clarify how the phase-shift approach avoids any implicit reliance on the black-hole renormalized angular momentum result when applied to generic sources.
  2. Notation for the anomalous dimension and scaling dimension could be made more explicit to distinguish it from standard QFT conventions and to improve readability of the central formula.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major comments below. Both concern the explicitness of the cancellation of object-dependent terms in establishing universality; we agree that additional clarification will strengthen the manuscript and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [phase-shift derivation and point-particle matching] In the phase-shift derivation for generic multipole sources, the subsequent matching to the point-particle limit does not explicitly demonstrate that all object-dependent finite pieces cancel in the UV renormalization of the multipole operators; this cancellation is load-bearing for the universality claim that the anomalous dimension is identical for black holes, neutron stars, and binaries.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The phase-shift calculation yields the coefficient of the logarithmic UV divergence in the multipole renormalization; this coefficient is fixed by the on-shell scattering data and is therefore independent of any finite, local counterterms. Object-dependent finite pieces are absorbed into the renormalization of the Wilson coefficients of the point-particle EFT and do not enter the anomalous dimension. To make the separation explicit, we will add a short paragraph after the matching discussion that isolates the divergent piece and states that only the phase-shift contribution survives in the scaling dimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [universality via point-particle EFT] The universality step asserts that the point-particle EFT isolates a structure-independent contribution at the order relevant for the tails, but the manuscript does not show that internal-structure contributions to multipole renormalization either vanish or are fully absorbed into non-universal counterterms; without this, the central claim that the universal part is the same for any compact object remains at risk.

    Authors: The point-particle EFT is defined by integrating out all internal degrees of freedom, so that any internal-structure effects appear only as finite renormalizations of the multipole operators. At the order relevant for the short-distance tails, the only running arises from the long-wavelength gravitational interactions captured by the phase shifts; structure-dependent contributions remain finite and are absorbed into non-universal counterterms. We will revise the universality paragraph to include this explicit statement and a one-sentence argument that the anomalous dimension is therefore identical for all compact objects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained with independent EFT methods

full rationale

The paper derives the universal anomalous scaling of multipole moments via two distinct EFT approaches: low-frequency GW absorption by black holes, which identifies the scaling dimension with the renormalized angular momentum of BH perturbation theory, and elastic scattering phase shifts off generic multipole sources, which reproduces the same result for the BH case. The universality step then invokes the standard point-particle EFT description of compact objects to isolate the structure-independent contribution. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted input or prior self-citation; the phase-shift calculation is performed directly for generic sources, and external benchmarks from BH perturbation theory provide independent verification. The central claim therefore rests on explicit matching and scattering amplitudes rather than definitional equivalence or load-bearing self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard effective field theory applied to classical GR and the assumption that a point-particle description captures the universal part of the anomalous dimension for any compact source.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Effective field theory methods are valid for describing low-frequency gravitational wave interactions with compact sources in classical general relativity.
    Invoked to derive the anomalous scaling from absorption and scattering.
  • domain assumption The point-particle effective description is universal across black holes, neutron stars, and binary systems.
    Required to extract the universal component of the anomalous dimension.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5746 in / 1322 out tokens · 55375 ms · 2026-05-22T20:09:56.288915+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wave-optics gravitational wave lensing in modified gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    In a curvature-coupled propagation framework for modified gravity, gravitational-wave lensing in wave optics shows persistent infrared interactions that prevent the amplification factor from approaching unity at zero ...

  2. Gravitational Sommerfeld Effects: Formalism, Renormalization, and Perturbation to $O(G^{10})$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Closed-form Sommerfeld factor via EFT connection matrix with analytic O(G^10) magnitude and phase for l=0,1,2 waves, plus a new RG equation for radiative multipole moments that improves waveform resummation beyond tai...

  3. 5-Dimensional Gravitational Raman Scattering: Scalar Wave Perturbations in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini Spacetime

    hep-th 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives closed 5D partial-wave Raman scattering amplitude via NS functions and computes non-vanishing dynamical ℓ=0 and static ℓ=1 scalar tidal Love numbers with RG running up to O(G²) for STBH.

  4. Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT

    gr-qc 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Renormalized dynamical tidal response functions for non-rotating black holes in GR carry inevitable ambiguities from renormalization scheme and flow initial condition, yielding scheme-dependent dynamical tidal Love nu...

  5. Tidal Response of Compact Objects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This review summarizes tidal Love numbers and dissipation effects for black holes, neutron stars, and exotic objects, noting vanishing static bosonic Love numbers for black holes in GR but nonzero values for fermions ...

  6. Love numbers of black holes and compact objects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A pedagogical review of Love numbers and tidal responses for black holes and compact objects in general relativity and extensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    renormalized angular momentum

    can be extracted from any grav- itational scattering process. This is true for both emis- sion and absorption of gravitational waves. The equiva- lence between the two is akin to relations between Ein- stein coefficients for absorption and stimulated emission in atomic physics. In particular, we can use a simple problem with a known result: the Raman (i.e.,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    no- hair

    depend on the system’s spin. The rotating (Kerr) BHs obey the “no- hair” theorem, dictating that all of their multipole mo- ments are uniquely fixed by their spin and mass. This is not true for a generic gravitating system, for which spin- induced multipole moments [ 40] and tidal effects (Love numbers) [ 32, 48, 68–79] break the universality starting at O(...

    work page

  3. [3]

    absorptive

    with the full col- lection of internal multipole moments. These multipole moments describe the absorption of waves by the BH horizon, producing inelasticity in the Raman scattering amplitude [ 35, 79, 80]. Let us focus now on the electric moment only. The computation for the magnetic part is identical. The inclusive absorption cross-section in the EFT at ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    hits poles in Bω . These corre- spond to the non-universal pieces described by EFT dia- grams that feature the insertion of dynamical tidal Love 1 Switching from ∑ cnǫn to ∑ ˜cnǫn takes into account that the renormalized multipoles absorb some scheme-dependent fini te loop parts. number operators, see e.g., [ 79, 81]. This issue manifests itself as poles f...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Comparing Eqs

    and using the partial wave basis, we find GP S (eiπω ) = e−2i(δP ℓm (ω )+δP ℓm (−ω ))GS(ω ) , (21) where δP ℓm(−ω ) is the analytic continuation of the phase shift performed with fixed J , that is, the time-reversed phase shift. Comparing Eqs. (

    work page

  6. [6]

    and ( 21) we find that the anomalous dimension is directly related to the phase shift, as advanced in Eq. ( 3). This is an exact relation for the anomalous dimension of radiative multipoles, valid for a generic system. For the specific case of BHs, using the known formulae for Raman scattering from BHPT (see e.g., Eq. (4.3) of Ref. [ 65] and Eq.(3.13) in [ ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Furthermore, it is important to note that the scattering phase shift, as computed in the EFT, re- ceives contributions from non-universal tidal Love num- bers starting at O(G2ℓ+1)

    are the same for any system, the angular-momentum (spin) dependent terms beyond the linear one are specific to a gravitat- ing source. Furthermore, it is important to note that the scattering phase shift, as computed in the EFT, re- ceives contributions from non-universal tidal Love num- bers starting at O(G2ℓ+1). The leading contribution from these is odd...

    work page

  8. [8]

    ℓm (ω ) ,

    enters as ˆν(ω ) = ℓ +γ univ. ℓm (ω ) ,. (34) The factor of ( rorbω )ˆν −ℓ in the amplitude and the one proportional to π in the phase are a direct consequence of running the RG evolution of the multipoles down to the orbital scale µ = 1 /r orb. These factors resum all universal sub-leading logarithms of the form ωn+k lognω with k > 0 corresponding to dis...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015) , arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015) , arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016) , arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019) , arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021) , 8 arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), (2021), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), PTEP 2021, 05A102 (2021) , arXiv:2009.09305 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 320, 379 (1986)

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    Blanchet, Proc

    L. Blanchet, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 409, 383 (1987)

    work page 1987

  19. [19]

    I. Z. Rothstein, Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1726 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    W. D. Goldberger, (2022), arXiv:2212.06677 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    W. D. Goldberger, in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study (2022) arXiv:2206.14249 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rept. 633, 1 (2016) , arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, JHEP 11, 106 (2020) , arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP 02, 048 (2021) , arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251101 (2018) , arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 02, 137 (2019) , arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, JHEP 10, 206 (2019) , arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D 104, 065014 (2021) , arXiv:2005.03071 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Buonanno, M

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, in Snowmass 2021 (2022) arXiv:2204.05194 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Cheung, J

    C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Roth- stein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, (2023), arXiv:2308.14832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Kosmopoulos and M

    D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon, JHEP 03, 125 (2024) , arXiv:2308.15304 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, J. Phys. A 55, 443014 (2022) , arXiv:2203.13024 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Ange- lis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, JHEP 06, 048 (2023) , arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, JHEP 06, 004 (2023) , arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP 07, 272 (2024) , arXiv:2303.06211 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP 2023, 126 (2023) , arXiv:2303.07006 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannes- dottir, and S. Mizera, JHEP 01, 139 (2024) , arXiv:2308.02125 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006 (1999) , arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064015 (2000) , arXiv:gr-qc/0001013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  40. [40]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Roth- stein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104029 (2006) , arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Roth- stein, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104030 (2006) , arXiv:hep-th/0511133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 77, 064026 (2008) , arXiv:0710.5150 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li, and I. Z. Rothstein, (2020), arXiv:2012.14869 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The quadrupole-moment term

    E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5287 (1998) , arXiv:gr-qc/9709032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  45. [45]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104031 (2006) , arXiv:gr-qc/0511061

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [46]

    Cubic order spin effects in the dynamics and gravitational wave energy flux of compact object binaries

    S. Marsat, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 085008 (2015) , arXiv:1411.4118 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Leading order finite size effects with spins for inspiralling compact binaries

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, JHEP 06, 059 (2015) , arXiv:1410.2601 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, JHEP 09, 219 (2015) , arXiv:1501.04956 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 091101 (2017) , arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    N. V. Krishnendu, C. K. Mishra, and K. G. Arun, Phys. Rev. D 99, 064008 (2019) , arXiv:1811.00317 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    H. S. Chia and T. D. P. Edwards, JCAP 11, 033 (2020) , arXiv:2004.06729 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    H. S. Chia, T. D. P. Edwards, R. N. George, A. Zim- merman, A. Coogan, K. Freese, C. Messick, and C. N. Setzer, (2022), arXiv:2211.00039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Z. Lyu, M. LaHaye, H. Yang, and B. Bonga, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064081 (2024) , arXiv:2308.09032 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124015 (2010) , arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    K. S. Thorne, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 299 (1980)

    work page 1980

  56. [56]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, (2021), arXiv:2102.08917 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Glazer, A

    D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, L. San- toni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, (2024), arXiv:2412.21090 [hep-th] . 9

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Gravitational-wave tails of tails

    L. Blanchet, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 113 (1998) , [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 22, 3381 (2005)], arXiv:gr-qc/9710038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Stu- rani, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084095 (2021) , arXiv:2107.02634 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Trestini and L

    D. Trestini and L. Blanchet, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104048 (2023) , arXiv:2301.09395 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Edison and M

    A. Edison and M. Levi, JHEP 08, 161 (2024) , arXiv:2310.20066 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Edison, JHEP 02, 016 (2025) , arXiv:2409.17222 [hep-th]

    A. Edison, JHEP 02, 016 (2025) , arXiv:2409.17222 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Teukolsky, Phys

    S. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1114 (1972)

    work page 1972

  64. [64]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973)

    work page 1973

  65. [65]

    Teukolsky and W

    S. Teukolsky and W. Press, Astrophys. J. 193, 443 (1974)

    work page 1974

  66. [66]

    Analytic Solutions of the Teukolsky Equation and their Properties

    S. Mano and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 97, 213 (1997) , arXiv:gr-qc/9611014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  67. [67]

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Taka- sugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549 (1996) , arXiv:gr-qc/9605057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  68. [68]

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Taka- sugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 1079 (1996) , arXiv:gr-qc/9603020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  69. [69]

    Analytic black hole perturbation approach to gravitational radiation

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Living Rev. Rel. 6, 6 (2003) , arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [70]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hat- suda, Annales Henri Poincare 23, 1951 (2022) , arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1951

  71. [71]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044047 (2022) , arXiv:2105.04483 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig, and A. Tanzini, Commun. Math. Phys. 397, 635 (2023) , arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, (2023), arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides

    S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, and J. Steinhoff, (2013), arXiv:1304.2228 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    H. S. Chia, (2020), arXiv:2010.07300 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Damour, in Les Houches Summer School on Gravi- tational Radiation , edited by N

    T. Damour, in Les Houches Summer School on Gravi- tational Radiation , edited by N. Deruelle and T. Piran (1982)

    work page 1982

  77. [77]

    Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084035 (2009) , arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  78. [78]

    Gravitational-wave versus binary-pulsar tests of strong-field gravity

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Phys. Rev. D 58, 042001 (1998) , arXiv:gr-qc/9803031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  79. [79]

    On the gravitational polarizability of black holes

    T. Damour and O. M. Le- cian, Phys. Rev. D 80, 044017 (2009) , arXiv:0906.3003 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

    T. Binnington and E. Pois- son, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084018 (2009) , arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.