arxiv: 2509.06951 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-08 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.CV

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generation to Actions

Qi Lv , Weijie Kong , Hao Li , Jia Zeng , Zherui Qiu , Delin Qu , Haoming Song , Qizhi Chen

show 2 more authors

Xiang Deng Jiangmiao Pang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.CV

keywords vision-language-actionvisual foresightnext-scale predictionembodied AIroboticsinverse dynamicsplanning

0 comments

The pith

F1 integrates visual foresight generation into vision-language-action models to create explicit planning targets for actions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces F1 as a pretrained VLA framework that adds visual foresight generation to the decision pipeline for language-conditioned tasks in dynamic scenes. Standard models rely on direct state-to-action mappings that produce short-sighted behavior. F1 instead uses next-scale prediction to generate goal-conditioned future visual states, which then serve as targets so that action generation becomes a foresight-guided inverse dynamics problem. A three-stage training process on more than 330k trajectories across 136 tasks equips the model with modular reasoning and transferable foresight, leading to higher success rates on real-world and simulated benchmarks.

Core claim

F1 adopts a Mixture-of-Transformer architecture with dedicated modules for perception, foresight generation, and control. At its core, F1 employs a next-scale prediction mechanism to synthesize goal-conditioned visual foresight as explicit planning targets. By forecasting plausible future visual states, F1 reformulates action generation as a foresight-guided inverse dynamics problem, enabling actions that implicitly achieve visual goals.

What carries the argument

The next-scale prediction mechanism that generates goal-conditioned visual foresight to serve as explicit planning targets for action generation.

If this is right

Action generation is recast as an inverse dynamics problem whose targets are the forecasted visual states.
The model produces higher task success rates and improved generalization across dynamic environments.
Modular reasoning emerges from the separate perception, foresight, and control components.
The learned visual foresight transfers to new tasks after the three-stage training regimen.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same foresight module could support longer-horizon planning by chaining multiple predicted states.
The inverse-dynamics reformulation may apply to other sequential decision domains that already use image prediction.
Replacing the next-scale predictor with a different generative backbone would test whether the performance gains depend on that specific architecture.

Load-bearing premise

The generated visual foresight accurately represents plausible future states that can reliably serve as planning targets for action generation in dynamic, real-world scenes.

What would settle it

A sequence of real-world trials in which the model's forecasted future images deviate from the actual camera observations and the resulting actions fail to reach the intended visual goals.

read the original abstract

Executing language-conditioned tasks in dynamic visual environments remains a central challenge in embodied AI. Existing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models predominantly adopt reactive state-to-action mappings, often leading to short-sighted behaviors and poor robustness in dynamic scenes. In this paper, we introduce F1, a pretrained VLA framework which integrates the visual foresight generation into decision-making pipeline. F1 adopts a Mixture-of-Transformer architecture with dedicated modules for perception, foresight generation, and control, thereby bridging understanding, generation, and actions. At its core, F1 employs a next-scale prediction mechanism to synthesize goal-conditioned visual foresight as explicit planning targets. By forecasting plausible future visual states, F1 reformulates action generation as a foresight-guided inverse dynamics problem, enabling actions that implicitly achieve visual goals. To endow F1 with robust and generalizable capabilities, we propose a three-stage training recipe on an extensive dataset comprising over 330k trajectories across 136 diverse tasks. This training scheme enhances modular reasoning and equips the model with transferable visual foresight, which is critical for complex and dynamic environments. Extensive evaluations on real-world tasks and simulation benchmarks demonstrate F1 consistently outperforms existing approaches, achieving substantial gains in both task success rate and generalization ability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

F1 adds a next-scale visual foresight module to VLA models via Mixture-of-Transformer but the abstract gives no numbers or ablations to back the outperformance claims.

read the letter

F1 tries to fix short-sighted behavior in language-conditioned robotics by inserting explicit visual foresight generation into the decision loop. It uses a Mixture-of-Transformer with separate modules for perception, next-scale prediction of goal-conditioned future images, and control, then treats action output as an inverse dynamics step that reaches those predicted states. The three-stage training on 330k trajectories across 136 tasks is a concrete recipe aimed at making the foresight transferable to dynamic scenes. That modular split and the training scale are the clearest new pieces on offer. The paper does a straightforward job laying out how understanding, generation, and action can sit inside one pretrained framework without forcing everything through a single reactive mapping. The soft spots sit right where the stress-test flagged them. The abstract states consistent outperformance and substantial gains in success rate and generalization, yet it contains no success percentages, no baseline comparisons, no error bars, and no ablation that isolates the foresight module. There are also no reported checks on how well the predicted visuals match real future frames or how prediction error flows into action mistakes. Without those, it is impossible to tell whether the foresight step is carrying the load or whether the gains come mainly from dataset size and staged training. The central assumption that the synthesized foresight stays plausible enough to serve as reliable planning targets therefore stays untested in the provided description. This paper is for people already working on VLA architectures who want to see one concrete way to add generation-based planning. A reader could borrow the module layout and training stages even if the results need more scrutiny. It deserves peer review so the full experiments can be examined for the missing metrics and ablations.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces F1, a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model using a Mixture-of-Transformer architecture with dedicated modules for perception, foresight generation, and control. It employs a next-scale prediction mechanism to synthesize goal-conditioned visual foresight as explicit planning targets, reformulating action generation as a foresight-guided inverse dynamics problem. Trained via a three-stage recipe on over 330k trajectories across 136 tasks, the model claims consistent outperformance over existing approaches in task success rate and generalization on real-world tasks and simulation benchmarks.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the integration of explicit visual foresight could meaningfully advance embodied AI by moving beyond reactive state-to-action mappings toward planning that accounts for future visual states, improving robustness in dynamic scenes. The scale of the training dataset and the modular architecture represent concrete strengths that could be adopted more broadly if the foresight mechanism is shown to be reliable.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'consistent outperformance' and 'substantial gains' supplies no quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, success rates, or ablation details, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the foresight mechanism drives the reported improvements.
[Method] Method (next-scale prediction and foresight module): No quantitative foresight metrics (e.g., frame-wise prediction error, semantic consistency, or horizon-dependent accuracy) or error-propagation analysis are provided to verify that the generated visual states are sufficiently plausible to serve as reliable planning targets for the inverse-dynamics reformulation in dynamic environments.
[Experiments] Experiments: The manuscript does not report ablations that isolate the contribution of the foresight-generation module from the three-stage training recipe or dataset scale, leaving open whether performance gains originate from the proposed mechanism or from scale alone.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'next-scale prediction mechanism' is used without a concise definition or pointer to the relevant prior literature, reducing accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.
[Throughout] Throughout: Ensure every figure and table is explicitly referenced in the text and that captions contain sufficient detail to interpret results independently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which helps clarify the presentation of our contributions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested changes in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'consistent outperformance' and 'substantial gains' supplies no quantitative metrics, baselines, error bars, success rates, or ablation details, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the foresight mechanism drives the reported improvements.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should include concrete quantitative support for the performance claims. In the revision we will expand the abstract to report key results from the experiments section, including average task success rates across the 136 tasks, standard deviations from repeated evaluations, and explicit comparisons against the main baselines. This will make the central claim more self-contained while preserving the abstract's brevity. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method (next-scale prediction and foresight module): No quantitative foresight metrics (e.g., frame-wise prediction error, semantic consistency, or horizon-dependent accuracy) or error-propagation analysis are provided to verify that the generated visual states are sufficiently plausible to serve as reliable planning targets for the inverse-dynamics reformulation in dynamic environments.

Authors: We acknowledge that direct quantitative validation of the foresight predictions would strengthen the methodological claims. Although the current manuscript emphasizes end-to-end task performance, we will add a dedicated evaluation subsection reporting frame-wise prediction error, semantic consistency via embedding similarity, and horizon-dependent accuracy. We will also include a brief correlation analysis between foresight quality and downstream action success to address error propagation. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments: The manuscript does not report ablations that isolate the contribution of the foresight-generation module from the three-stage training recipe or dataset scale, leaving open whether performance gains originate from the proposed mechanism or from scale alone.

Authors: We agree that isolating the foresight module's contribution is important for attributing gains correctly. In the revised experiments section we will add ablation variants that disable the foresight-generation module (replacing it with direct action prediction) while keeping the same training recipe and dataset, as well as comparisons across training stages and dataset sizes. These results will be presented in a new table to demonstrate the incremental benefit of the foresight component. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; architecture and training recipe presented as independent empirical contributions

full rationale

The paper describes a Mixture-of-Transformer architecture with next-scale prediction for goal-conditioned visual foresight and a three-stage training recipe on 330k trajectories, but provides no equations, derivations, or self-citations that reduce the claimed foresight-guided inverse dynamics reformulation or performance gains to quantities defined by the model's own fitted parameters or inputs. The next-scale mechanism is introduced as an adopted component rather than derived from the target results, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior self-work are invoked to force the conclusions. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that visual foresight can be generated accurately enough to guide actions; this is a domain assumption rather than a derived result. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Visual foresight generated by next-scale prediction provides reliable planning targets for action selection in dynamic environments
Invoked as the core mechanism that allows reformulation of action generation as foresight-guided inverse dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5548 in / 1224 out tokens · 28381 ms · 2026-05-16T12:37:25.610411+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

LoopVLA: Learning Sufficiency in Recurrent Refinement for Vision-Language-Action Models
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

LoopVLA adds recurrent refinement and learned sufficiency estimation to VLA models, cutting parameters 45% and raising throughput 1.7x while matching baseline task success on LIBERO and VLA-Arena.
OA-WAM: Object-Addressable World Action Model for Robust Robot Manipulation
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

OA-WAM uses persistent address vectors and dynamic content vectors in object slots to enable addressable world-action prediction, improving robustness on manipulation benchmarks under scene changes.
FrameSkip: Learning from Fewer but More Informative Frames in VLA Training
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

FrameSkip improves VLA policy training success from 66.50% to 76.15% by selecting high-importance frames and retaining only 20% of unique frames across three benchmarks.
PriorVLA: Prior-Preserving Adaptation for Vision-Language-Action Models
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

PriorVLA preserves pretrained priors in VLA models through a frozen Prior Expert and trained Adaptation Expert, delivering better robot manipulation performance than full fine-tuning with only 25% of the parameter updates.
When to Trust Imagination: Adaptive Action Execution for World Action Models
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Future Forward Dynamics Causal Attention (FFDC) enables World Action Models to adaptively choose action chunk lengths based on prediction-observation consistency, cutting model inferences by 69% and improving real-wor...
When to Trust Imagination: Adaptive Action Execution for World Action Models
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A verifier called Future Forward Dynamics Causal Attention enables adaptive action execution in World Action Models, reducing model inferences by 69% and improving success rates in robotic tasks.
PRTS: A Primitive Reasoning and Tasking System via Contrastive Representations
cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

PRTS pretrains VLA models with contrastive goal-conditioned RL to embed goal-reachability probabilities from offline data, yielding SOTA results on robotic benchmarks especially for long-horizon and novel instructions.
OFlow: Injecting Object-Aware Temporal Flow Matching for Robust Robotic Manipulation
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

OFlow unifies temporal foresight and object-aware reasoning inside a shared latent space via flow matching to improve VLA robustness in robotic manipulation under distribution shifts.
ABot-M0: VLA Foundation Model for Robotic Manipulation with Action Manifold Learning
cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

ABot-M0 unifies heterogeneous robot data into a 6-million-trajectory dataset and introduces Action Manifold Learning to predict stable actions on a low-dimensional manifold using a DiT backbone.
InternVLA-M1: A Spatially Guided Vision-Language-Action Framework for Generalist Robot Policy
cs.RO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

InternVLA-M1 uses spatially guided pre-training on 2.3M examples followed by action post-training to deliver up to 17% gains on robot manipulation benchmarks and 20.6% on unseen objects.
Learning Action Manifold with Multi-view Latent Priors for Robotic Manipulation
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

The method uses multi-view diffusion priors and action manifold learning to resolve depth ambiguity and improve action prediction in VLA robotic manipulation models, reporting higher success rates than baselines on LI...
STARRY: Spatial-Temporal Action-Centric World Modeling for Robotic Manipulation
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

STARRY uses unified diffusion to align spatial-temporal world predictions with action generation plus GASAM for geometry-aware attention, reaching 93.82%/93.30% success on 50 bimanual tasks in simulation and raising r...
Cortex 2.0: Grounding World Models in Real-World Industrial Deployment
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Cortex 2.0 introduces world-model-based planning that generates and scores future trajectories to outperform reactive vision-language-action baselines on industrial robotic tasks including pick-and-place, sorting, and...
World-Value-Action Model: Implicit Planning for Vision-Language-Action Systems
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

The World-Value-Action model enables implicit planning for VLA systems by performing inference over a learned latent representation of high-value future trajectories instead of direct action prediction.
Motus: A Unified Latent Action World Model
cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Motus unifies understanding, video generation, and action in one latent world model via MoT experts and optical-flow latent actions, reporting gains over prior methods in simulation and real robots.
World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI
cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

The paper introduces World Action Models as a new paradigm unifying predictive world modeling with action generation in embodied foundation models and provides a taxonomy of existing approaches.
OmniVLA-RL: A Vision-Language-Action Model with Spatial Understanding and Online RL
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

OmniVLA-RL uses a mix-of-transformers architecture and flow-matching reformulated as SDE with group segmented policy optimization to surpass prior VLA models on LIBERO benchmarks.
World Model for Robot Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

A comprehensive survey that organizes the literature on world models in robot learning, their roles in policy learning, planning, simulation, and video-based generation, with connections to navigation, driving, datase...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 17 Pith papers · 24 internal anchors

[1]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06669. Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, Humen Zhong, Yuanzhi Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Zhaohai Li, Jianqiang Wan, Pengfei Wang, Wei Ding, Zheren Fu, Yiheng Xu, Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Tianbao Xie, Zesen Cheng, Hang Zhang, Zhibo Yang, Haiyang Xu, and Junyan...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13923. Lucas Beyer, Andreas Steiner, Andr´e Susano Pinto, Alexander Kolesnikov, Xiao Wang, Daniel Salz, Maxim Neumann, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Michael Tschannen, Emanuele Bugliarello, Thomas Unterthiner, Daniel Keysers, Skanda Koppula, Fangyu Liu, Adam Grycner, Alexey Gritsenko, Neil Houlsby, Manoj Kumar, Keran Rong, Julian Ei...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer

URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2407.07726. Johan Bjorck, Fernando Casta ˜neda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi Fan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10639. Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al.π 0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[5]

RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06817. Qingwen Bu, Yanting Yang, Jisong Cai, Shenyuan Gao, Guanghui Ren, Maoqing Yao, Ping Luo, and Hongyang Li. Univla: Learning to act anywhere with task-centric latent actions,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actions

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06111. Jun Cen, Chaohui Yu, Hangjie Yuan, Yuming Jiang, Siteng Huang, Jiayan Guo, Xin Li, Yibing Song, Hao Luo, Fan Wang, Deli Zhao, and Hao Chen. Worldvla: Towards autoregressive action world model,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21539. Chilam Cheang, Sijin Chen, Zhongren Cui, Yingdong Hu, Liqun Huang, Tao Kong, Hang Li, Yifeng Li, Yuxiao Liu, Xiao Ma, Hao Niu, Wenxuan Ou, Wanli Peng, Zeyu Ren, Haixin Shi, Jiawen Tian, Hongtao Wu, Xin Xiao, Yuyang Xiao, Jiafeng Xu, and Yichu Yang. Gr-3 technical report,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

GR-3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15493, 2025

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15493. Jiuhai Chen, Zhiyang Xu, Xichen Pan, Yushi Hu, Can Qin, Tom Goldstein, Lifu Huang, Tianyi Zhou, Saining Xie, Silvio Savarese, Le Xue, Caiming Xiong, and Ran Xu. Blip3-o: A family of fully open unified multimodal models-architecture, training and dataset,

work page arXiv
[9]

URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.09568. 17 F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generation to Actions Cheng Chi, Zhenjia Xu, Siyuan Feng, Eric Cousineau, Yilun Du, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, and Shuran Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04137,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[10]

Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08864. Chaorui Deng, Deyao Zhu, Kunchang Li, Chenhui Gou, Feng Li, Zeyu Wang, Shu Zhong, Wei- hao Yu, Xiaonan Nie, Ziang Song, Guang Shi, and Haoqi Fan. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining, 2025a. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14683. 18 F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generatio...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[11]

Tenenbaum, Dale Schuur- mans, and Pieter Abbeel

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2302.00111. Chongkai Gao, Haozhuo Zhang, Zhixuan Xu, Zhehao Cai, and Lin Shao. Flip: Flow-centric gen- erative planning as general-purpose manipulation world model,

work page arXiv
[12]

Flip: Flow-centric generative planning as general-purpose manipulation world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08261, 2024

URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2412.08261. Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium,

work page arXiv
[13]

GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08500. Yucheng Hu, Yanjiang Guo, Pengchao Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Jianke Zhang, Koushil Sreenath, Chaochao Lu, and Jianyu Chen. Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14803,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[14]

OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2406.09246. Doyup Lee, Chiheon Kim, Saehoon Kim, Minsu Cho, and Wook-Shin Han. Autoregressive im- age generation using residual quantization,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[15]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2203. 01941. Hao Li, Shuai Yang, Yilun Chen, Yang Tian, Xiaoda Yang, Xinyi Chen, Hanqing Wang, Tai Wang, Feng Zhao, Dahua Lin, and Jiangmiao Pang. Cronusvla: Transferring latent motion across time for multi-frame prediction in manipulation, 2025a. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2506. 19816. Shuang Li, Yihuai Gao, Dorsa Sadigh, and Shura...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Mixture-of-transformers: A sparse and scalable architecture for multi-modal foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04996, 2024

URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2411.04996. Chao Liao, Liyang Liu, Xun Wang, Zhengxiong Luo, Xinyu Zhang, Wenliang Zhao, Jie Wu, Liang Li, Zhi Tian, and Weilin Huang. Mogao: An omni foundation model for interleaved multi-modal generation, 2025a. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05472. Yue Liao, Pengfei Zhou, Siyuan Huang, Donglin Yang, Shengcong Chen, Yuxin Jiang,...

work page arXiv
[17]

UniWorld-V1: High-Resolution Semantic Encoders for Unified Visual Understanding and Generation

URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2506.03147. Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02747. Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qiang Liu, Yuke Zhu, and Peter Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning, 2023a. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2306.03310. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning, 2023b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2304....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[19]

VLA-RL: Towards Masterful and General Robotic Manipulation with Scalable Reinforcement Learning

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18719. Pan Lu, Baolin Peng, Hao Cheng, Michel Galley, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu, Song-Chun Zhu, and Jianfeng Gao. Chameleon: Plug-and-play compositional reasoning with large language mod- els,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[20]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09842. OpenAI, Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Floren- cia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, Red Avila, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Valerie Balcom, Paul Baltescu, Haiming Bao, Moham- mad Bavarian, Jeff Belgum, Irwan Bello, Jake Berdine, Gabr...

work page arXiv
[21]

GPT-4 Technical Report

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774. Xichen Pan, Satya Narayan Shukla, Aashu Singh, Zhuokai Zhao, Shlok Kumar Mishra, Jialiang Wang, Zhiyang Xu, Jiuhai Chen, Kunpeng Li, Felix Juefei-Xu, Ji Hou, and Saining Xie. Trans- fer between modalities with metaqueries,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[22]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09747. Delin Qu, Haoming Song, Qizhi Chen, Zhaoqing Chen, Xianqiang Gao, Xinyi Ye, Qi Lv, Modi Shi, Guanghui Ren, Cheng Ruan, Maoqing Yao, Haoran Yang, Jiacheng Bao, Bin Zhao, and Dong Wang. Embodiedonevision: Interleaved vision-text-action pretraining for general robot control, 2025a. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21112. Del...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

Searching for Activation Functions

URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05941. Hao Shi, Bin Xie, Yingfei Liu, Lin Sun, Fengrong Liu, Tiancai Wang, Erjin Zhou, Haoqiang Fan, Xiangyu Zhang, and Gao Huang. Memoryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language- action models for robotic manipulation,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[24]

Hume: Introducing system-2 thinking in visual-language- action model

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21432. Jianlin Su, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Ahmed Murtadha, Bo Wen, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: En- hanced transformer with rotary position embedding,

work page arXiv
[25]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2104.09864. Gemini Robotics Team, Saminda Abeyruwan, Joshua Ainslie, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Montser- rat Gonzalez Arenas, Travis Armstrong, Ashwin Balakrishna, Robert Baruch, Maria Bauza, Michiel Blokzijl, et al. Gemini robotics: Bringing ai into the physical world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20020, 2025a. Gemma Team, Aishwarya Kam...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[26]

org/abs/2506.19850

URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2506.19850. Chengyue Wu, Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Yiyang Ma, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, Chong Ruan, and Ping Luo. Janus: Decoupling visual encoding for unified multimodal understanding and generation,

work page arXiv
[27]

Janus: Decoupling Visual Encoding for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2410.13848. Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[28]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2408.12528. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, Chujie Zheng, Dayiheng Liu, Fan Zhou, Fei Huang, Feng Hu, 22 F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generation to Actions Hao Ge, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jian Yang, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15343. Biao Zhang and Rico Sennrich. Root mean square layer normalization,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[30]

Root mean square layer normalization,

URLhttps:// arxiv.org/abs/1910.07467. Wenyao Zhang, Hongsi Liu, Zekun Qi, Yunnan Wang, Xinqiang Yu, Jiazhao Zhang, Runpei Dong, Jiawei He, Fan Lu, He Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, Li Yi, Wenjun Zeng, and Xin Jin. Dreamvla: A vision-language-action model dreamed with comprehensive world knowledge, 2025a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04447. Zijian Zhang, Kaiyuan ...

work page arXiv 1910
[31]

CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22020. Tony Z Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.13705,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[32]

Flowvla: Visual chain of thought-based motion reasoning for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18269,

URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.18269. Chunting Zhou, Lili Yu, Arun Babu, Kushal Tirumala, Michihiro Yasunaga, Leonid Shamis, Jacob Kahn, Xuezhe Ma, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Omer Levy. Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model,

work page arXiv
[33]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02792. 23 F1: A Vision-Language-Action Model Bridging Understanding and Generation to Actions A DATASETDETAILS Our training corpus combines large internet-scale robot datasets with curated in-house demonstra- tions, spanning multiple embodiments (Genie-G1, Franka, WidowX, Google Robot, ARX LIFT II), camera viewpoints (third-p...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[34]

Put the pen from the table into the pen holder

Stage I focuses on learning general visual representations. It uses a large batch size of 1280 and a high learning rate of3.0×10 −4 over 512K training steps. In Stage II, we refine the model with a larger batch size of 2880 and a constant learning rate of5.0×10 −5 for 100K steps. This stage introduces action prediction, using a loss weight of 0.1:1 to bal...

work page 2025