pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.00704 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-30 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

No boundary density matrix in elliptic de Sitter dS/mathbb{Z}₂

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc
keywords elliptic de Sitterno-boundary proposaldensity matrixnon-orientable spacetimevon Neumann entropyRényi entropyDirac fermioncrosscap quench
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Euclidean path integral over elliptic de Sitter defines a no-boundary density matrix instead of a wavefunction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes that in the non-time-orientable elliptic de Sitter spacetime, obtained by antipodal identification of global de Sitter, the no-boundary Euclidean path integral does not prepare a wavefunction but rather a density matrix. Using this interpretation, the authors compute the von Neumann and Rényi entropies for a free Dirac fermion conformal field theory in two dimensions by mapping the problem to correlation functions of vertex operators on non-orientable surfaces. This approach also yields the time evolution of entanglement entropy after a crosscap quench. The work highlights that the global Hilbert space in this setting is one-dimensional, while each observer's Hilbert space is a nontrivial Fock space. A sympathetic reader would care because it extends the no-boundary proposal to spacetimes without time orientation, potentially relevant for understanding quantum states in cosmology.

Core claim

The path integral on the Euclidean elliptic de Sitter defines a no-boundary density matrix, whose von Neumann and Rényi entropies are computed analytically via correlation functions of vertex operators on non-orientable surfaces for the free Dirac fermion CFT in two-dimensional elliptic dS.

What carries the argument

The no-boundary density matrix prepared by the Euclidean path integral on dS/ℤ₂, evaluated through vertex operator correlations on non-orientable Riemann surfaces.

If this is right

  • The von Neumann and Rényi entropies of the density matrix can be computed exactly in the free fermion model.
  • The entanglement entropy evolves in time following a crosscap quench according to the computed correlation functions.
  • The global Hilbert space of free QFT in elliptic dS is one-dimensional.
  • Each observer's associated Hilbert space remains a nontrivial Fock space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework may apply to other non-orientable spacetimes in quantum field theory on curved backgrounds.
  • Computations of entanglement in such settings could inform models of quantum cosmology where time orientation is absent.
  • Further study might reveal how this density matrix evolves under perturbations or couplings to gravity.

Load-bearing premise

That the Euclidean path integral over the elliptic de Sitter geometry can be directly interpreted as a density matrix without requiring extra structure to account for the lack of time orientation.

What would settle it

A direct computation showing that the proposed density matrix does not have unit trace or is not positive semi-definite would falsify the interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.00704 by Rapha\"el Dulac, Zixia Wei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A sketch of global dS2 and elliptic dS2. On the other hand, developing a quantum theory of gravity in dS is also of great theoretical interests. One of the most successful approaches of quantum gravity is the holographic principle [4, 5], and the AdS/CFT correspondence [6] serves as the most well-understood example. The AdS/CFT correspondence states that a quantum gravitational theory in (d+1)- dimensional… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A sketch of S 2 and RP2 . They are the Euclidean counterparts of dS2 and dS2/Z2. emerges. It is surprising such a feature appears in different proposals, and this motivates us to understand the physical meaning of the Euclidean quantum field theory (QFT) on Euclidean elliptic dS is. The situation is, however, very different from the relation between global dSd+1 and its Euclidean counterpart S d+1. A Eucli… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A sketch of global dS2 with metric ds2 = L 2 dS (−dt2 + cosh(t) 2dϕ2 ) where t ∈ (−∞, ∞) and ϕ ∈ (−π, π] with ϕ ∼ ϕ + 2π is shown. The right panel shows its Penrose diagram. The static patch associated to the static observer sitting at ϕ = 0 is shaded. The static patch can be expressed as |ϕ| + arcsin(tanh|t|) < π/2. Its boundary is called the cosmological horizon. The elliptic de Sitter is defined as a Z2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The left panel shows how a 2D elliptic de Sitter is obtained from a global dS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The upper left panel shows that a spacetime point living on the intersection of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Euclidean counterpart of dS2 is S 2 , which admits θ → −θ as a time-reflection symmetry whose fixed locus separates it into two hemispheres. The path integral over a hemisphere prepares a no-boundary state |Ψ⟩ on θ = 0. The sphere partition function computes ZS 2 = ⟨Ψ|Ψ⟩. The path integral over the sphere with an open slit at θ = 0 along the subsystem A computes TrAC |Ψ⟩⟨Ψ|, where AC is the complement … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Euclidean counterpart of dS2/Z2 is RP2 , which does not admit a time-reflection symmetry whose fixed locus separates it into two disconnected parts. Therefore, one cannot associate a no-boundary wave function to it. The path integral over the RP2 with an open slit at θ = 0 along the subsystem A computes a Hermitian matrix ρA. Accordingly, ZRP2 = TrρA. We identify this ρA as a density matrix on A, calle… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The replica manifold Σ3 to compute Tr (ρ 3 A). 3 Replica computation of free fermion on non-orientable surfaces Since RP2 is a non-orientable surface, we would like to investigate the replica computation in 2D free Dirac fermion CFT on non-orientable surfaces in this section. The results will be used to compute the entanglement entropy and R´enyi entropies of the no-boundary density matrix on elliptic dS i… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the |ϕ2 − ϕ1| dependence for SA with fixed θ’s. 0 π 2 π 0 ϕ 1 2 3 4 5 SA(θ1=θ2,ϕ) SA(θ1=θ2,ϕ) θ=0 θ= π 12 θ= π 6 |￾2 ￾ ￾1| SA ✓ =0 ✓ = ⇡/12 ✓ = ⇡/6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: f(ϕ1 − ϕ2, t) as a function of t for fixed ϕ1 − ϕ2. This function diverges at t = t∗ shown in (4.22), which is the cosmological horizon for a static observer sitting at ϕ = (ϕ1 + ϕ2)/2, and turns negative for t > t∗. Intuitively, this is because the subsystem A is timelike separated with itself in this case. 0 1 2 3 1 t 2 SA(t,ϕ) SA(t,ϕ) ϕ= π 6 ϕ= π 3 ϕ= π 2 0 π 2 π 0 ϕ 1 2 3 4 5 SA(t1=t2,ϕ) SA(t1=t2,ϕ) t… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The left panel shows the entanglement entropy as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The entanglement entropy SA(t, l) of a single interval subsystem A as a function of its length l at different but fixed time. The left panel shows t = 0 while on the right panel t = π 2 . We chose εUV = 1 and β = 1 5 . For sufficiently large l, the entanglement entropy does not scale with l when t = π 2 . By contrast, it grows linearly as a function of l at t = 0. First of all, the left panel of figure 12… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The entanglement entropy SA(t, l) of a single interval subsystem A as a function of time t. The left figure shows l = π, the case when A is exactly a half of the whole system. The left panel shows the case of l = π 2 . We chose εUV = 1 and β = 1 5 . can see that once the time evolution is turned on, the entanglement entropy for the half system monotonically decrease. The entanglement entropy turns over an… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The quasi particle picture. The entangled particles are depicted as arrows with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Elliptic de Sitter (dS) spacetime dS$/\mathbb{Z}_2$ is a non-time-orientable spacetime obtained by imposing an antipodal identification to global dS. Unlike QFT on global dS, whose vacuum state can be prepared by a no-boundary Euclidean path integral, the Euclidean elliptic dS does not define a wavefunction in the usual sense. We propose instead that the path integral on the Euclidean elliptic dS defines a no-boundary density matrix. As an explicit example, we study the free Dirac fermion CFT in two-dimensional elliptic dS and analytically compute the von Neumann and the R\'enyi entropies of this density matrix. The calculation reduces to correlation functions of vertex operators on non-orientable surfaces. As a by-product, we compute the time evolution of entanglement entropy following a crosscap quench in free Dirac fermion CFT. We also comment on a striking feature of free QFT in elliptic dS: its global Hilbert space is one-dimensional, wheres the Hilbert space associated to each observer is a nontrivial Fock space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the Euclidean path integral on non-time-orientable elliptic de Sitter space dS/ℤ₂ defines a no-boundary density matrix (rather than a wavefunction) for observers. As an explicit example in the free Dirac fermion CFT in two dimensions, the von Neumann and Rényi entropies of this density matrix are computed analytically by reducing the problem to correlation functions of vertex operators on non-orientable surfaces. The work also derives the time evolution of entanglement entropy after a crosscap quench and highlights that the global Hilbert space is one-dimensional while each observer's Hilbert space is a nontrivial Fock space.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the result supplies an explicit, analytically tractable model for a no-boundary density matrix in a non-orientable de Sitter background, together with closed-form entropy expressions obtained from standard CFT techniques on non-orientable surfaces. This provides a concrete bridge between the no-boundary proposal and entanglement measures in dS quantum gravity, and the crosscap-quench calculation offers a new solvable example of entanglement dynamics in free CFT. The observation that the global Hilbert space is one-dimensional while observer spaces remain nontrivial is a noteworthy structural feature of QFT on elliptic dS.

major comments (2)
  1. [Proposal of the no-boundary density matrix] The proposal that the Euclidean elliptic dS path integral directly yields a density operator ρ on the observer Fock space requires an explicit construction of the reduction step (tracing over antipodal/crosscap degrees of freedom) that demonstrates positivity, trace normalization, and compatibility with the non-time-orientable topology. Without this derivation the subsequent entropy extraction from vertex-operator correlators rests on an unverified assumption; this is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Entropy computation via CFT correlators] The statement that the calculation 'reduces to known CFT correlators' on non-orientable surfaces is asserted in the abstract and introduction, but the explicit analytic continuation from the Euclidean elliptic geometry to the Lorentzian observer correlators, including the precise vertex-operator insertions and the handling of the crosscap, is not displayed in sufficient detail to verify the absence of additional phases or normalization factors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation distinguishing the global one-dimensional Hilbert space from the observer Fock space should be introduced with a short diagram or explicit basis choice early in the text to avoid confusion when the density-matrix reduction is discussed.
  2. A brief comparison table of the elliptic dS results with the corresponding quantities on global dS would help readers assess the effect of the ℤ₂ identification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of the central construction. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to provide the requested explicit derivations and details.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Proposal of the no-boundary density matrix] The proposal that the Euclidean elliptic dS path integral directly yields a density operator ρ on the observer Fock space requires an explicit construction of the reduction step (tracing over antipodal/crosscap degrees of freedom) that demonstrates positivity, trace normalization, and compatibility with the non-time-orientable topology. Without this derivation the subsequent entropy extraction from vertex-operator correlators rests on an unverified assumption; this is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the reduction is necessary to make the proposal fully rigorous. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 2.2) that constructs the density matrix explicitly: the Euclidean path integral on the elliptic geometry with the crosscap identification is shown to compute matrix elements of the form Tr(ρ O), where O is any operator supported in a single observer patch. Positivity follows from the reflection positivity of the underlying Euclidean CFT, trace normalization is fixed by the partition function on the closed non-orientable surface, and compatibility with the topology is ensured because the antipodal identification is built into the manifold rather than imposed after the fact. This derivation justifies the subsequent reduction of the entropies to vertex-operator correlators on non-orientable surfaces. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Entropy computation via CFT correlators] The statement that the calculation 'reduces to known CFT correlators' on non-orientable surfaces is asserted in the abstract and introduction, but the explicit analytic continuation from the Euclidean elliptic geometry to the Lorentzian observer correlators, including the precise vertex-operator insertions and the handling of the crosscap, is not displayed in sufficient detail to verify the absence of additional phases or normalization factors.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation was too terse on this technical step. In the revised version we have expanded Section 3 and added Appendix B, which now display the full analytic continuation: the Euclidean correlators on the non-orientable surface (RP² or Klein bottle) are continued to Lorentzian signature by rotating the crosscap coordinate, with vertex operators inserted at the entanglement cuts corresponding to the observer’s causal patch. We explicitly verify that the fermionic boundary conditions around the crosscap produce no extra phases beyond the standard spin-structure factors already accounted for in the literature on non-orientable CFT, and that the overall normalization is fixed by matching to the known two-point function on the sphere. The resulting closed-form expressions for the von Neumann and Rényi entropies are unchanged, but the intermediate steps are now fully written out. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal and CFT computations are self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central move is an interpretive proposal that the Euclidean elliptic dS path integral defines a density matrix rather than a wavefunction. This is stated as a suggestion, not derived from prior equations within the paper. The entropy calculations are performed by reducing to standard vertex-operator correlators on non-orientable surfaces using free Dirac fermion CFT techniques, which are independent of the proposal itself. The observation that the global Hilbert space is one-dimensional while observer Hilbert spaces are nontrivial Fock spaces is presented as a feature of the background, not used to force or redefine the density matrix. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the load-bearing steps. The derivation chain does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Euclidean path-integral definition of the no-boundary proposal, the validity of QFT on a non-time-orientable background, and the identification of the resulting object as a density matrix. No free parameters are introduced in the abstract. The non-orientable geometry itself is an input from the spacetime construction rather than an invented entity with independent evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Euclidean path integral over elliptic dS can be interpreted as a density matrix rather than a wavefunction due to the antipodal identification.
    Invoked in the opening paragraph of the abstract to replace the usual no-boundary wavefunction.
  • standard math Free Dirac fermion CFT on non-orientable surfaces yields well-defined vertex-operator correlation functions that compute the entropies.
    Used to reduce the entropy calculation to known CFT objects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1629 out tokens · 80805 ms · 2026-05-17T03:50:05.471247+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Tale of Two Hartle-Hawking Wave Functions: Fully Gravitational vs Partially Frozen

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In AdS the fully gravitational Hartle-Hawking wave function acquires a nontrivial one-loop phase while the partially frozen version stays real and positive; a partially frozen de Sitter sphere shows phase cancellation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  2. [2]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

  3. [3]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc.C930308(1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026]

  4. [4]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089]

  5. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]

  6. [6]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP10(2001) 034 [hep-th/0106113]

  7. [7]

    C. M. Hull,Timelike T duality, de Sitter space, large N gauge theories and topological field theory,JHEP07(1998) 021 [hep-th/9806146]

  8. [8]

    J. M. Maldacena,Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,JHEP05(2003) 013 [astro-ph/0210603]. 35

  9. [9]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 015009 [1108.5735]

  10. [10]

    Hikida, T

    Y. Hikida, T. Nishioka, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Holography in de Sitter Space via Chern-Simons Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 041601 [2110.03197]

  11. [11]

    The dS/dS Correspondence

    M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein and D. Tong,The dS/dS correspondence,AIP Conf. Proc.743(2004) 393 [hep-th/0407125]

  12. [12]

    X. Dong, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,De Sitter Holography and Entanglement Entropy,JHEP07(2018) 050 [1804.08623]

  13. [13]

    Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes,Universe7(2021) 464 [2106.03964]

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes,Universe7(2021) 464 [2106.03964]

  14. [14]

    Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe9(2023) 368 [2109.01322]

    L. Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe9(2023) 368 [2109.01322]

  15. [15]

    Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,JHAP1(2021) 1 [2109.14104]

    L. Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example,JHAP1(2021) 1 [2109.14104]

  16. [16]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography,JHEP 05(2025) 032 [2310.16994]

  17. [17]

    Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP03(2025) 076 [2402.00635]

    H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP03(2025) 076 [2402.00635]

  18. [18]

    Verlinde and M

    H. Verlinde and M. Zhang,SYK correlators from 2D Liouville-de Sitter gravity,JHEP 05(2025) 053 [2402.02584]

  19. [19]

    Schr¨ odinger,Expanding universe

    E. Schr¨ odinger,Expanding universe. Cambridge University Press, 1956

  20. [20]

    M. K. Parikh, I. Savonije and E. P. Verlinde,Elliptic de Sitter space: dS/Z(2),Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 064005 [hep-th/0209120]

  21. [21]

    Wei,Holographic dual of crosscap conformal field theory,JHEP03(2025) 086 [2405.03755]

    Z. Wei,Holographic dual of crosscap conformal field theory,JHEP03(2025) 086 [2405.03755]

  22. [22]

    Blommaert, D

    A. Blommaert, D. Tietto and H. Verlinde,SYK collective field theory as complex Liouville gravity,2509.18462. 36

  23. [23]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A360(1978) 117

  24. [24]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 2960

  25. [25]

    Ivo, Y.-Z

    V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li and J. Maldacena,The no boundary density matrix,JHEP02(2025) 124 [2409.14218]

  26. [26]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.2004(2004) P06002

  27. [27]

    Les Houches Lectures on De Sitter Space

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich,Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings, pp. 423–453, 10, 2001, hep-th/0110007

  28. [28]

    N. A. Chernikov and E. A. Tagirov,Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A9(1968) 109

  29. [29]

    Mottola,Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,Phys

    E. Mottola,Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 754

  30. [30]

    Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,Phys

    B. Allen,Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 3136

  31. [31]

    Conformal Vacua and Entropy in de Sitter Space

    R. Bousso, A. Maloney and A. Strominger,Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 104039 [hep-th/0112218]

  32. [32]

    Miller,Path integral games with de Sitterα-vacua,JHEP10(2025) 097 [2503.13701]

    N. Miller,Path integral games with de Sitterα-vacua,JHEP10(2025) 097 [2503.13701]

  33. [33]

    Blommaert, J

    A. Blommaert, J. Kudler-Flam and E. Y. Urbach,Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state,JHEP11(2025) 113 [2505.14771]

  34. [34]

    Wei,Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral,2506.21489

    Z. Wei,Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral,2506.21489

  35. [35]

    Measuring Black Hole Formations by Entanglement Entropy via Coarse-Graining

    T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin,Measuring Black Hole Formations by Entanglement Entropy via Coarse-Graining,JHEP11(2010) 054 [1008.3439]. 37

  36. [36]

    Physics at the entangling surface

    K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa,Physics at the entangling surface,J. Stat. Mech.1504 (2015) P04010 [1406.4167]

  37. [37]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

  38. [38]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511618123

  39. [39]

    Universal entropy of conformal critical theories on a Klein bottle

    H.-H. Tu,Universal entropy of conformal critical theories on a Klein bottle,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 261603 [1707.05812]

  40. [40]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. Hulsch, H.-C. Zhang, W. Tang, L. Wang and H.-H. Tu,Universal Scaling of Klein Bottle Entropy near Conformal Critical Points,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 151602 [2211.09745]

  41. [41]

    Shimizu and A

    H. Shimizu and A. Ueda,Tensor network simulations for non-orientable surfaces, 2402.15507

  42. [42]

    Chiba and Y

    Y. Chiba and Y. Yoneta,Exact Thermal Eigenstates of Nonintegrable Spin Chains at Infinite Temperature,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 170404 [2403.12330]

  43. [43]

    Yoneta,Thermal pure states for systems with antiunitary symmetries and their tensor network representations,Phys

    Y. Yoneta,Thermal pure states for systems with antiunitary symmetries and their tensor network representations,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) L042062 [2407.14454]

  44. [44]

    Caetano and S

    J. Caetano and S. Komatsu,Crosscap States in Integrable Field Theories and Spin Chains,J. Stat. Phys.187(2022) 30 [2111.09901]

  45. [45]

    Chalas, P

    K. Chalas, P. Calabrese and C. Rylands,Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states,2412.04187

  46. [46]

    Wei and Y

    Z. Wei and Y. Yoneta,Crosscap Quenches and Entanglement Evolution,2412.18610

  47. [47]

    Zhang, Y.-H

    Y. Zhang, Y.-H. Wu, L. Wang and H.-H. Tu,Crosscap states and duality of Ising field theory in two dimensions,2409.11046

  48. [48]

    Harada, J

    W. Harada, J. Kaidi, Y. Kusuki and Y. Liu,New Crosscap States,2508.18357. 38

  49. [49]

    Ishibashi,The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,Mod

    N. Ishibashi,The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,Mod. Phys. Lett.A4(1989) 251

  50. [50]

    J. L. Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl. Phys.B324(1989) 581

  51. [51]

    Blumenhagen and E

    R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn,Introduction to Conformal Field Theory: With Applications to String Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009

  52. [52]

    B.-Y. Tan, Y. Zhang, H.-C. Zhang, W. Tang, L. Wang, H.-H. Tu et al.,Extracting the Luttinger Parameter from a Single Wave Function,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 076501 [2402.18364]

  53. [53]

    Cotler and A

    J. Cotler and A. Strominger,The Universe as a Quantum Encoder,2201.11658

  54. [54]

    Entanglement entropy in de Sitter space

    J. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel,Entanglement entropy in de Sitter space,JHEP02 (2013) 038 [1210.7244]

  55. [55]

    Nakata, T

    Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei,New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 026005 [2005.13801]

  56. [56]

    Mollabashi, N

    A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei,Pseudo Entropy in Free Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 081601 [2011.09648]

  57. [57]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031601 [2210.09457]

  58. [58]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki,Timelike entanglement entropy,JHEP05(2023) 052 [2302.11695]

  59. [59]

    Milekhin, Z

    A. Milekhin, Z. Adamska and J. Preskill,Observable and computable entanglement in time,2502.12240

  60. [60]

    G. W. Gibbons,The elliptic interpretation of black holes and quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B271(1986) 497. 39

  61. [61]

    N. G. Sanchez,Quantum Field Theory and the ’Elliptic Interpretation’ of De Sitter Space-time,Nucl. Phys. B294(1987) 1111

  62. [62]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,JHEP08(2020) 044 [2002.08950]

  63. [63]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland, 2004.06738

  64. [64]

    Usatyuk, Z.-Y

    M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity, SciPost Phys.17(2024) 051 [2402.00098]

  65. [65]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,JHEP05(2025) 059 [2501.02632]

  66. [66]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,2501.02359

  67. [67]

    H. Z. Chen,Observers seeing gravitational Hilbert spaces: abstract sources for an abstract path integral,JHEP10(2025) 139 [2505.15892]

  68. [68]

    Nomura and T

    Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin,Nonperturbative quantum gravity in a closed Lorentzian universe,JHEP10(2025) 166 [2505.20390]

  69. [69]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Sharma, A. Strominger and T. Wang,No-boundary state for Klein space,J. Phys. A58(2025) 165401 [2410.08853]

  70. [70]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Strominger and T. Wang,Quantum Fields on Time-Periodic AdS 3/Z, 2510.15036

  71. [71]

    Sewing Constraints and Non-Orientable Open Strings

    D. Fioravanti, G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti,Sewing constraints and nonorientable open strings,Phys. Lett. B321(1994) 349 [hep-th/9311183]

  72. [72]

    Tsiares,Universal Dynamics in Non-Orientable CFT 2,2011.09250

    I. Tsiares,Universal Dynamics in Non-Orientable CFT 2,2011.09250

  73. [73]

    Chen,Exact Quench Dynamics from Thermal Pure Quantum States, 2510.05346

    H.-H. Chen,Exact Quench Dynamics from Thermal Pure Quantum States, 2510.05346. 40

  74. [74]

    C. Bai, M. T. Tan, B. Lapierre and S. Ryu,Spatially Structured Entanglement from Nonequilibrium Thermal Pure States,2510.25868

  75. [75]

    Evolution of Entanglement Entropy in One-Dimensional Systems

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems,J. Stat. Mech.0504(2005) P04010 [cond-mat/0503393]

  76. [76]

    J. Wei, M. Allen, J. Kemp, C. Wang, Z. Wei, J. E. Moore et al.,Universality of Shallow Global Quenches in Critical Spin Chains,2509.22773

  77. [77]

    Boundary States as Holographic Duals of Trivial Spacetimes

    M. Miyaji, S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi and X. Wen,Boundary States as Holographic Duals of Trivial Spacetimes,JHEP05(2015) 152 [1412.6226]. 41