Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

As of 23 July 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 26 of 26 outbound references and 100 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2307.13702.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2307.13702 v1

Coverage vector

measured 26 of 26 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.390234Z

measured 126 of 126 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00

measured 100 of 180 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-15T11:31:26.851193Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-07-11T00:37:43.053081Z

Reference resolution

26 of 26 outbound references displayed

verified exact8
verified fuzzy4
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier1
metadata mismatch13

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 9c3e0558-329d-4c7c-b10d-de80518435de · outbound

This paper cites Language models as agent models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Language models as agent models

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.534792Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ed0c44c0-072d-4a14-8996-c1787ed64d9f · outbound

This paper cites Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Reference 2

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.588347Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 310a7225-23d5-403c-b16f-07a60dbc2a9a · outbound

This paper cites Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Models

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-17T15:01:41.422297Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 42f3679c-a503-42ca-aa6b-0899b98e3555 · outbound

This paper cites Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.665457Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 77362fa4-78fa-4bed-a2a3-f43687b01787 · outbound

This paper cites Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge

Reference 5

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.784832Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 36cec669-0e30-408e-b77f-a4540d8d5eee · outbound

This paper cites Faithful Reasoning Using Large Language Models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Faithful Reasoning Using Large Language Models

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.889349Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fb721806-0646-4dc9-bd9e-d92265480f8a · outbound

This paper cites Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate

Reference 7

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-12T03:01:45.301651Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d4e529b7-9eed-48c8-a95e-99f098f8c2d3 · outbound

This paper cites Successive prompting for decomposing complex questions.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Successive prompting for decomposing complex questions

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.464859Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation af2f82d5-f17d-4fbb-a365-01ce01d58a69 · outbound

This paper cites URL https: //aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.81.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning URL https: //aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.81

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.354755Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e40fb9df-7487-4bcd-8245-9f109f257360 · outbound

This paper cites URL https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sc irobotics.aay7120.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning URL https: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sc irobotics.aay7120

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.016749Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d2dd1ed0-0477-45e1-98b7-40dcec18eb05 · outbound

This paper cites What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?

Reference 11

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.992068Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 3ffba062-af03-495a-837b-fa6ec45e4d69 · outbound

This paper cites Jacovi and Y.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Jacovi and Y

Reference 12

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.564923Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 0f986712-a651-420d-bafc-d8cc13a3dd6f · outbound

This paper cites Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better

Reference 13

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.295774Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e1e93a3e-cbca-4efc-9096-4dfc2eaa1e27 · outbound

This paper cites URLhttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning URLhttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.694637Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 5c609946-0b58-480c-b7a4-ba8f1a5fd35d · outbound

This paper cites Program Induction by Rationale Generation: Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Program Induction by Rationale Generation: Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems

Reference 15

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.797352Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ea21a291-bede-4ecb-ace3-6b8f8d6e5a0c · outbound

This paper cites Logiqa: A challenge dataset for machine reading comprehension with logical reasoning.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Logiqa: A challenge dataset for machine reading comprehension with logical reasoning

Reference 16

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.887808Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fcb165cf-84cd-46db-ab64-6d9d8b811db1 · outbound

This paper cites Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango

Reference 17

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.389361Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 03ed4b30-b1fd-4684-b6b9-f46839a06416 · outbound

This paper cites Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.274730Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 3789a7bc-0c9b-47ec-9d70-e7d5ee5f5d9e · outbound

This paper cites doi: 10.18653/v1/D18-.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning doi: 10.18653/v1/D18-

Reference 19

Resolution: malformed identifier; doi_truncated, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.147604Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e96e1bb5-a7f1-42c2-a4c1-a9ebea700ed0 · outbound

This paper cites Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead

Reference 20

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.627737Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 216a096d-5215-4c86-9e01-548008079792 · outbound

This paper cites Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting

Reference 21

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-15T12:01:19.882845Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation caab02dd-a9cf-48b4-b704-53104a30a3b5 · outbound

This paper cites Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models

Reference 22

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-16T08:43:46.984626Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 0aa03b69-680b-47c3-85d0-94f7496fbdc1 · outbound

This paper cites Rationale-Augmented Ensembles in Language Models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Rationale-Augmented Ensembles in Language Models

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.105665Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 9b16ba66-0ca5-4dc3-b6c0-7001266737d9 · outbound

This paper cites Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models

Reference 24

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:40.196870Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ca50e230-0241-45d5-b244-545a6f76d50d · outbound

This paper cites URL https:// doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1472.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning URL https:// doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1472

Reference 25

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:38.471882Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e9e57f8b-ce17-4b67-8cb6-26ac124ece5f · outbound

This paper cites Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences.

Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences

Reference 27

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:51:39.464894Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Pith citing papers

Observation aba4b3ea-1a09-4a71-8543-8dea535c0a13 · inbound

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions cites this paper.

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 163

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T02:46:27.325938Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 18f2c11e-d450-48c0-a9b0-48e6926c7bba · inbound

Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs cites this paper.

Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMs Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 33

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T00:52:02.536551Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 5851f7f6-f5c2-4c93-ab7c-1ed8b0d0c431 · inbound

Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming cites this paper.

Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-16T14:22:01.663013Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation cd134cf4-e6f8-4304-ac66-49af03c7cc62 · inbound

Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representations cites this paper.

Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representations Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 13

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-17T04:47:40.416837Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fd8ae6bc-7013-42c1-b2d9-fddb5c5d0ab7 · inbound

OpenAI o1 System Card cites this paper.

OpenAI o1 System Card Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 21

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-23T06:42:39.679765Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d14e9e89-2584-4b06-a015-94d3fd653eea · inbound

Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation cites this paper.

Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 28

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-21T07:24:12.943511Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation b9d98a70-2587-4a2e-beee-1d2fd6814b44 · inbound

Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens cites this paper.

Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-19T01:21:58.115138Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1f1ed01d-e616-4c8c-95f3-1d2634c8e406 · inbound

Do Activation Verbalization Methods Convey Privileged Information? cites this paper.

Do Activation Verbalization Methods Convey Privileged Information? Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 30

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T15:42:42.176623Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation bc544b31-60eb-4c70-87c9-7faa7fd02fbf · inbound

On the Reasoning Abilities of Masked Diffusion Language Models cites this paper.

On the Reasoning Abilities of Masked Diffusion Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 3

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T06:56:01.524577Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation eb3391ef-9335-48b4-92a9-0631e664be8a · inbound

AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal Reasoning cites this paper.

AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 1

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T06:25:58.670854Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 87df96fe-1941-4bcd-ac8a-1aebc393bd8a · inbound

Can Aha Moments Be Fake? Towards Quantifying Decorative and True Thinking in Chain-of-Thought cites this paper.

Can Aha Moments Be Fake? Towards Quantifying Decorative and True Thinking in Chain-of-Thought Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T02:45:46.166458Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e44d9eae-e7ca-46e6-8140-7cf1e8565be7 · inbound

Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction cites this paper.

Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-18T03:00:48.265638Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 6b75f5c5-8fc9-41bb-ac1f-6b6ab0ec9660 · inbound

FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle cites this paper.

FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 30

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-17T20:50:15.230417Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation afde311a-65c5-44f6-b0b6-2a5c23048158 · inbound

FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle cites this paper.

FireScope: Wildfire Risk Raster Prediction with a Chain-of-Thought Oracle Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 30

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-25T07:20:28.800415Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 0e404c5f-e040-452d-aa46-07da2fcb06bd · inbound

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool cites this paper.

Training Language Models to Use Prolog as a Tool Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-17T01:18:48.415038Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d67d0cc8-e759-4601-a4d4-1a63e4b64206 · inbound

Do LLMs Encode Functional Importance of Reasoning Tokens? cites this paper.

Do LLMs Encode Functional Importance of Reasoning Tokens? Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 1

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-16T17:08:08.199173Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation cb918adb-2ab5-4c03-9386-9e01e190fcaf · inbound

Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models cites this paper.

Emergent Manifold Separability during Reasoning in Large Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 11

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T20:16:35.023235Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 564d2891-2522-4d02-ba55-c7e7775478a7 · inbound

Measuring and curing reasoning rigidity: from decorative chain-of-thought to genuine faithfulness cites this paper.

Measuring and curing reasoning rigidity: from decorative chain-of-thought to genuine faithfulness Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T01:19:37.294342Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4af4b4f8-9f97-456a-97e2-dde7aa2bba73 · inbound

LongTail Driving Scenarios with Reasoning Traces: The KITScenes LongTail Dataset cites this paper.

LongTail Driving Scenarios with Reasoning Traces: The KITScenes LongTail Dataset Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 40

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T00:33:23.329178Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 7c760d15-b8e7-4b34-b174-059e21028a23 · inbound

WMF-AM: Probing LLM Working Memory via Depth-Parameterized Cumulative State Tracking cites this paper.

WMF-AM: Probing LLM Working Memory via Depth-Parameterized Cumulative State Tracking Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 24

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-14T22:03:03.088799Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation b170f153-aaaa-436f-8ba5-c16c61734b54 · inbound

The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook cites this paper.

The Latent Space: Foundation, Evolution, Mechanism, Ability, and Outlook Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 99

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-07-13T14:03:01.974171Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 81d51213-3ad6-4240-b321-3f13ff510d62 · inbound

From Sycophancy to Deception: A Unified Taxonomy for LLM Spontaneous Misalignment cites this paper.

From Sycophancy to Deception: A Unified Taxonomy for LLM Spontaneous Misalignment Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 3

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T19:20:45.106436Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation b5b10c18-a722-4b5b-9cba-80b7b8db5fa6 · inbound

Inclusion-of-Thoughts: Mitigating Preference Instability via Purifying the Decision Space cites this paper.

Inclusion-of-Thoughts: Mitigating Preference Instability via Purifying the Decision Space Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T11:35:31.803014Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation f8eaaee1-2398-4186-9353-b85434c0fc43 · inbound

CUE-R: Beyond the Final Answer in Retrieval-Augmented Generation cites this paper.

CUE-R: Beyond the Final Answer in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 9

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T23:05:51.388070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 26c8ad3b-0bdb-421d-b79a-5aabcf73c63a · inbound

Act or Escalate? Evaluating Escalation Behavior in Automation with Language Models cites this paper.

Act or Escalate? Evaluating Escalation Behavior in Automation with Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T23:28:26.275369Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ab7b35be-9be7-4c64-9d79-c8c0ce0e5325 · inbound

FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning cites this paper.

FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T11:16:04.746109Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e0b9da85-83c3-4a12-b658-d432b0898801 · inbound

From Answers to Arguments: Toward Trustworthy Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning with Toulmin-Guided Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning cites this paper.

From Answers to Arguments: Toward Trustworthy Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning with Toulmin-Guided Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 4

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T08:45:59.470167Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 60de5e31-f21b-4c03-b2bc-2f4b72015464 · inbound

Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges cites this paper.

Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 40

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T14:00:28.737021Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 87f611cd-8187-47f7-8302-50fc0ef08e66 · inbound

Mamba-SSM with LLM Reasoning for Feature Selection: Faithfulness-Aware Biomarker Discovery cites this paper.

Mamba-SSM with LLM Reasoning for Feature Selection: Faithfulness-Aware Biomarker Discovery Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 3

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T11:30:18.694587Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 8d8efdad-6c19-4a8a-9af2-7d283590dde6 · inbound

Reasoning Dynamics and the Limits of Monitoring Modality Reliance in Vision-Language Models cites this paper.

Reasoning Dynamics and the Limits of Monitoring Modality Reliance in Vision-Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T11:00:04.054341Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 0721e63e-7504-4777-99f6-e70dcb41ba58 · inbound

LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought cites this paper.

LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T08:53:04.684782Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation f6e18d1a-161a-4b4f-97ee-4eac71a51f4f · inbound

Disambiguating electrical detection of magnetization dynamics in magnetic insulators cites this paper.

Disambiguating electrical detection of magnetization dynamics in magnetic insulators Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-07-15T11:31:26.851193Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a16104a0-3e80-414c-9fd4-24c3f9f3f839 · inbound

MEDLEY-BENCH: Scale Buys Evaluation but Not Control in AI Metacognition cites this paper.

MEDLEY-BENCH: Scale Buys Evaluation but Not Control in AI Metacognition Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 21

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T08:53:03.529009Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 25b07929-7bb7-4673-a367-d581912f7c84 · inbound

AtManRL: Towards Faithful Reasoning via Differentiable Attention Saliency cites this paper.

AtManRL: Towards Faithful Reasoning via Differentiable Attention Saliency Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T08:22:37.704156Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 7c46f2c2-848b-468f-8532-498c66be7c42 · inbound

Do Hallucination Neurons Generalize? Evidence from Cross-Domain Transfer in LLMs cites this paper.

Do Hallucination Neurons Generalize? Evidence from Cross-Domain Transfer in LLMs Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 24

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T00:48:25.079532Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation a17569e0-1859-421d-999f-6808001f2f36 · inbound

Escaping the Agreement Trap: Defensibility Signals for Evaluating Rule-Governed AI cites this paper.

Escaping the Agreement Trap: Defensibility Signals for Evaluating Rule-Governed AI Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 13

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T00:19:46.535953Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation f5343d46-4208-47d7-afc4-0a4356dee58c · inbound

Large Language Models Decide Early and Explain Later cites this paper.

Large Language Models Decide Early and Explain Later Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T19:21:09.351795Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1befc306-73ae-4f3a-9a28-719e3a170ca3 · inbound

Thinking Without Words: Efficient Latent Reasoning with Abstract Chain-of-Thought cites this paper.

Thinking Without Words: Efficient Latent Reasoning with Abstract Chain-of-Thought Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T19:31:07.340462Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation a96fec87-3cbd-49ae-8271-f38e3686b98d · inbound

VeriLLMed: Interactive Visual Debugging of Medical Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs cites this paper.

VeriLLMed: Interactive Visual Debugging of Medical Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 26

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T20:46:13.361153Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e2580677-2470-4f3c-a050-56e761fe6bb3 · inbound

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI cites this paper.

Green Shielding: A User-Centric Approach Towards Trustworthy AI Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 8

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T21:56:24.795220Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fe1ae87b-2552-4231-886c-777dd0c47f69 · inbound

Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use cites this paper.

Risk Reporting for Developers' Internal AI Model Use Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T23:16:16.870590Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 56fd84f4-db2a-4094-949d-139391522620 · inbound

Analyzing LLM Reasoning to Uncover Mental Health Stigma cites this paper.

Analyzing LLM Reasoning to Uncover Mental Health Stigma Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 2

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T22:11:13.266803Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 79f754a7-f661-41f5-af97-8b77fa20f2df · inbound

Knowledge Distillation Must Account for What It Loses cites this paper.

Knowledge Distillation Must Account for What It Loses Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 52

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T23:26:18.035472Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation bba5edc7-ddca-4570-920c-dac398fb4e68 · inbound

Knowledge Distillation Must Account for What It Loses cites this paper.

Knowledge Distillation Must Account for What It Loses Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 52

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-11T22:01:13.619368Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation c24b04f8-2163-4b3d-81b7-26cb7f0dd357 · inbound

Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models cites this paper.

Consciousness with the Serial Numbers Filed Off: Measuring Trained Denial in 115 AI Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 29

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T23:23:27.048663Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4cd7c7a9-f377-4f1e-a55e-49cb265cbdeb · inbound

TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1 cites this paper.

TRUST: A Framework for Decentralized AI Service v.0.1 Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T10:01:28.779069Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 3be2bbe0-763a-45cf-a3a6-0350b6c1a13f · inbound

Compliance versus Sensibility: On the Reasoning Controllability in Large Language Models cites this paper.

Compliance versus Sensibility: On the Reasoning Controllability in Large Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T09:51:29.001424Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ba615150-76da-4775-8a6d-10904e26dcef · inbound

Compared to What? Baselines and Metrics for Counterfactual Prompting cites this paper.

Compared to What? Baselines and Metrics for Counterfactual Prompting Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 70

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-09T19:05:10.564047Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 6c010835-f72c-4cc2-b8f9-e622b38551a1 · inbound

LLMs Should Not Yet Be Credited with Decision Explanation cites this paper.

LLMs Should Not Yet Be Credited with Decision Explanation Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 17

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T16:06:33.415201Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1230fe8e-5e98-4835-983f-56ba238a1b80 · inbound

NeuroState-Bench: A Human-Calibrated Benchmark for Commitment Integrity in LLM Agent Profiles cites this paper.

NeuroState-Bench: A Human-Calibrated Benchmark for Commitment Integrity in LLM Agent Profiles Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T11:26:04.443272Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 7eb559aa-70e6-40cc-a7b8-2cad07c9e15d · inbound

NeuroState-Bench: A Human-Calibrated Benchmark for Commitment Integrity in LLM Agent Profiles cites this paper.

NeuroState-Bench: A Human-Calibrated Benchmark for Commitment Integrity in LLM Agent Profiles Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T06:59:49.269139Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation df4f4a7f-91f0-4203-a3c2-3c2c0bc91048 · inbound

Reliable AI Needs to Externalize Implicit Knowledge: A Human-AI Collaboration Perspective cites this paper.

Reliable AI Needs to Externalize Implicit Knowledge: A Human-AI Collaboration Perspective Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-09T05:55:29.475339Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ceda3898-0d96-4113-8b3b-7a986f22698b · inbound

Reliable AI Needs to Externalize Implicit Knowledge: A Human-AI Collaboration Perspective cites this paper.

Reliable AI Needs to Externalize Implicit Knowledge: A Human-AI Collaboration Perspective Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-01T00:15:09.066564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 75257ba1-242f-4b8f-834d-db16f45fe96b · inbound

AgenticPosesRanker: An Agentic AI Framework for Physically Grounded Ranking of Protein-Ligand Docking Poses cites this paper.

AgenticPosesRanker: An Agentic AI Framework for Physically Grounded Ranking of Protein-Ligand Docking Poses Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 28

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T16:41:07.757075Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 2cae353b-024d-4169-8776-f7ff64da7568 · inbound

Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability cites this paper.

Understanding Annotator Safety Policy with Interpretability Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 23

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T17:21:08.586519Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation bca19c7b-a35e-4574-8d32-de6d0a80e85b · inbound

Decodable but Not Corrected by Fixed Residual-Stream Linear Steering: Evidence from Medical LLM Failure Regimes cites this paper.

Decodable but Not Corrected by Fixed Residual-Stream Linear Steering: Evidence from Medical LLM Failure Regimes Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 39

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T19:31:10.434347Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 5c31ac8f-fc7f-4688-a675-2438f828919b · inbound

Evaluation Awareness in Language Models Has Limited Effect on Behaviour cites this paper.

Evaluation Awareness in Language Models Has Limited Effect on Behaviour Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T19:46:15.237243Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 660311e6-73b4-4a10-bdc8-32f3674c4244 · inbound

Measuring Black-Box Confidence via Reasoning Trajectories: Geometry, Coverage, and Verbalization cites this paper.

Measuring Black-Box Confidence via Reasoning Trajectories: Geometry, Coverage, and Verbalization Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T20:11:10.002120Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation abbc8eea-1d17-469d-ac9f-b482e4cfd3bb · inbound

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning cites this paper.

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T05:05:56.696347Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation bf8d002a-6941-40af-abd8-092da4a505d8 · inbound

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning cites this paper.

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T07:41:28.746209Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 69ddab04-b3bb-428d-bce5-40ca4c877d0b · inbound

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning cites this paper.

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T06:22:23.211873Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e1e4e93a-2949-470e-9566-da6a793c6b84 · inbound

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning cites this paper.

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-14T20:59:27.813479Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 3395586b-ba5f-4a76-bbdc-3627d3746ed6 · inbound

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning cites this paper.

Extracting Search Trees from LLM Reasoning Traces Reveals Myopic Planning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-25T06:00:23.408488Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 820abb87-4d33-411a-94d7-9a31c1c7b3d0 · inbound

Rethinking Dense Sequential Chains: Reasoning Language Models Can Extract Answers from Sparse, Order-Shuffling Chain-of-Thoughts cites this paper.

Rethinking Dense Sequential Chains: Reasoning Language Models Can Extract Answers from Sparse, Order-Shuffling Chain-of-Thoughts Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 26

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T03:50:57.488474Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation c1d2ed23-1fe4-4172-bb6f-76a977e339a0 · inbound

Explanation Fairness in Large Language Models: An Empirical Analysis of Disparities in How LLMs Justify Decisions Across Demographic Groups cites this paper.

Explanation Fairness in Large Language Models: An Empirical Analysis of Disparities in How LLMs Justify Decisions Across Demographic Groups Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T08:01:28.555788Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 9bc355f9-bca0-4ccc-87b2-9269ae3143ed · inbound

Can MLLMs Reason About Visual Persuasion? Evaluating the Efficacy and Faithfulness of Reasoning cites this paper.

Can MLLMs Reason About Visual Persuasion? Evaluating the Efficacy and Faithfulness of Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T07:42:07.056737Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d1ea7ad7-0c96-4c78-8f4c-db1281957eb6 · inbound

BiAxisAudit: A Novel Framework to Evaluate LLM Bias Across Prompt Sensitivity and Response-Layer Divergence cites this paper.

BiAxisAudit: A Novel Framework to Evaluate LLM Bias Across Prompt Sensitivity and Response-Layer Divergence Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 44

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T07:21:26.803499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4a77f969-43fb-44d0-8915-50e476c8dae2 · inbound

Hidden Error Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: The Signal Is Diagnostic, Not Causal cites this paper.

Hidden Error Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: The Signal Is Diagnostic, Not Causal Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 3

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T05:31:25.418102Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4ec5485b-b928-4e74-be88-620b12d6f7f5 · inbound

The Last Word Often Wins: A Format Confound in Chain-of-Thought Corruption Studies cites this paper.

The Last Word Often Wins: A Format Confound in Chain-of-Thought Corruption Studies Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T07:06:26.211209Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 05a6b4da-db17-48d0-83db-c1ec0a987751 · inbound

The Last Word Often Wins: A Format Confound in Chain-of-Thought Corruption Studies cites this paper.

The Last Word Often Wins: A Format Confound in Chain-of-Thought Corruption Studies Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-19T17:27:41.365207Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 74a87801-8f24-411d-b438-93cf68baf7e7 · inbound

Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations cites this paper.

Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-12T07:21:25.621709Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 637f22e8-657e-466b-8e93-f8dcc1f13f09 · inbound

Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations cites this paper.

Evaluating the False Trust Engendered by LLM Explanations Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T21:53:47.161520Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 7f81a893-d4d0-4aec-8b69-69eb139dcd62 · inbound

Deep Reasoning in General Purpose Agents via Structured Meta-Cognition cites this paper.

Deep Reasoning in General Purpose Agents via Structured Meta-Cognition Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 85

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T02:52:09.152169Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1d143636-e5a9-4252-852d-841c5f22aa9b · inbound

Drop the Act: Probe-Filtered RL for Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning cites this paper.

Drop the Act: Probe-Filtered RL for Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T02:17:07.213602Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4e91a1cd-5c6b-4b23-90ae-2488bea25c19 · inbound

When Reasoning Traces Become Performative: Step-Level Evidence that Chain-of-Thought Is an Imperfect Oversight Channel cites this paper.

When Reasoning Traces Become Performative: Step-Level Evidence that Chain-of-Thought Is an Imperfect Oversight Channel Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 28

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-13T06:32:24.382672Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 621b7727-b8a9-4d84-8ab1-5cf57b84cb06 · inbound

Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces cites this paper.

Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 251

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-14T20:17:54.883508Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation ef1241cc-4c20-49f6-8de7-26dd850af9d7 · inbound

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict cites this paper.

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T02:03:28.750587Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e16f1b66-512c-4c1c-94ae-16e280db0662 · inbound

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict cites this paper.

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-19T16:42:39.903716Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 65e71b72-1da9-4f6e-9dbc-5fc7625af95f · inbound

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict cites this paper.

Does RAG Know When Retrieval Is Wrong? Diagnosing Context Compliance under Knowledge Conflict Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-01T14:25:46.754523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 81a1ceaf-ac29-4d60-b74e-3cc60c43b0ca · inbound

SpeakerLLM: A Speaker-Specialized Audio-LLM for Speaker Understanding and Verification Reasoning cites this paper.

SpeakerLLM: A Speaker-Specialized Audio-LLM for Speaker Understanding and Verification Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-15T03:24:55.834111Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d4cfa9e1-dfdb-4afd-955b-db651014cec4 · inbound

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture cites this paper.

Proof-Carrying Certificates for LLM Pipelines: A Trust-Boundary Architecture Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 40

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T21:33:46.375288Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 790ba829-19bb-4bea-be47-7f05ef043516 · inbound

Is VLA Reasoning Faithful? Probing Safety of Chain-of-Causation in Autonomous Driving Models cites this paper.

Is VLA Reasoning Faithful? Probing Safety of Chain-of-Causation in Autonomous Driving Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T13:33:19.276808Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 98ce7102-bef0-430a-b114-039ec4d62884 · inbound

Is VLA Reasoning Faithful? Probing Safety of Chain-of-Causation in Autonomous Driving Models cites this paper.

Is VLA Reasoning Faithful? Probing Safety of Chain-of-Causation in Autonomous Driving Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T19:45:00.769683Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fc7bda6c-3943-4938-b6ff-69fc3389eff3 · inbound

SPATIOROUTE: Dynamic Prompt Routing for Zero-Shot Spatial Reasoning cites this paper.

SPATIOROUTE: Dynamic Prompt Routing for Zero-Shot Spatial Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 16

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T11:08:13.518077Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 14649c9a-402e-4a02-9409-50aabb5f7529 · inbound

Monitoring the Internal Monologue: Probe Trajectories Reveal Reasoning Dynamics cites this paper.

Monitoring the Internal Monologue: Probe Trajectories Reveal Reasoning Dynamics Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T11:03:13.896633Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation a8ab7e8f-fece-418d-ba31-6dd08cb11304 · inbound

Auditing Reasoning-Trace Memorization Claims after Unlearning with Head-Conditioned Canaries cites this paper.

Auditing Reasoning-Trace Memorization Claims after Unlearning with Head-Conditioned Canaries Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T14:13:21.046295Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 301e8aa8-31aa-4f62-bae1-7f31ced0b1a8 · inbound

Counterfactual Likelihood Tests for Indirect Influence in Private Reasoning Channels cites this paper.

Counterfactual Likelihood Tests for Indirect Influence in Private Reasoning Channels Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T13:08:17.850961Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation a38f8d6f-7206-4c3b-9e7a-33a480131a0a · inbound

Probabilistic Tiny Recursive Model cites this paper.

Probabilistic Tiny Recursive Model Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-20T05:43:05.900954Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation d2e5c683-3e22-4d3a-8381-1b7d4ad53476 · inbound

The Illusion of Reasoning: Exposing Evasive Data Contamination in LLMs via Zero-CoT Truncation cites this paper.

The Illusion of Reasoning: Exposing Evasive Data Contamination in LLMs via Zero-CoT Truncation Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-22T08:06:15.339510Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 95ebcf97-bc83-4d24-aa57-1c515d2f7188 · inbound

The Readout Shortcut: Positional Number Copying Dominates Arithmetic CoT Readout in Small Language Models cites this paper.

The Readout Shortcut: Positional Number Copying Dominates Arithmetic CoT Readout in Small Language Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 15

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-25T06:30:25.614868Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation e865cffd-f1c8-4933-9ffc-812a06915a5d · inbound

The Deterministic Horizon: Impossibility Results as Design Specifications for Trustworthy AI Systems cites this paper.

The Deterministic Horizon: Impossibility Results as Design Specifications for Trustworthy AI Systems Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 33

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-05-25T05:30:22.721236Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 6b6f0827-30fd-488b-b616-92e9d6ef061d · inbound

Faithful or Fabricated? A Causal Framework for Rationalization Bias in LLM Judges cites this paper.

Faithful or Fabricated? A Causal Framework for Rationalization Bias in LLM Judges Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 20

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T21:55:05.917805Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 4e8771ab-b875-412f-b970-bca2cd12e1ed · inbound

Faithfulness as Information Flow: Evaluating and Training Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning cites this paper.

Faithfulness as Information Flow: Evaluating and Training Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T15:34:47.976533Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 59d826d6-53ac-42d2-931a-5b508ebd55ef · inbound

Understanding and Mitigating Premature Confidence for Better LLM Reasoning cites this paper.

Understanding and Mitigating Premature Confidence for Better LLM Reasoning Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 11

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T14:04:44.431053Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1a1bb1f5-6f6a-4757-ba02-c70694a3ae0c · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T13:34:40.585534Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation fa334a4f-1415-47fc-8b5b-c10b56ceeee9 · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-01T08:05:31.918695Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 0ffcc3db-fbc7-4d8e-bf47-537cc5b7b153 · inbound

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework cites this paper.

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 5

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-02T23:27:26.729039Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 1d12e536-83c5-4cd3-9e61-49cdbdecd62a · inbound

Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization cites this paper.

Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 7

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T12:24:39.906418Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 5663c35f-c492-430a-9f31-f76f80bc92b8 · inbound

Faithfulness Metrics Don't Measure Faithfulness: A Meta-Evaluation with Ground Truth cites this paper.

Faithfulness Metrics Don't Measure Faithfulness: A Meta-Evaluation with Ground Truth Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 10

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-30T12:04:39.065815Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.

Observation 45ca3f4c-0862-4d92-a20f-2f31f702343d · inbound

ProSR: Process-Shaped Spatial Reasoning for Reliable Chain-of-Thought in VLMs cites this paper.

ProSR: Process-Shaped Spatial Reasoning for Reliable Chain-of-Thought in VLMs Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Reference 17

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-29T22:23:59.835106Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-07-23T06:31:01.910684+00:00.