Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Synthetic Data Generation & Multi-Step RL for Reasoning & Tool Use

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.04736 v2 pith:EHL5ZXW5 submitted 2025-04-07 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

Synthetic Data Generation & Multi-Step RL for Reasoning & Tool Use

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG
keywords datamulti-stepreasoninggenerationswirlsynthetictaskstool
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning has been shown to improve the performance of large language models. However, traditional approaches like RLHF or RLAIF treat the problem as single-step. As focus shifts toward more complex reasoning and agentic tasks, language models must take multiple steps of text generation, reasoning and environment interaction before generating a solution. We propose a synthetic data generation and RL methodology targeting multi-step optimization scenarios. This approach, called Step-Wise Reinforcement Learning (SWiRL), iteratively generates multi-step reasoning and tool use data, and then learns from that data. It employs a simple step-wise decomposition that breaks each multi-step trajectory into multiple sub-trajectories corresponding to each action by the original model. It then applies synthetic data filtering and RL optimization on these sub-trajectories. We evaluated SWiRL on a number of multi-step tool use, question answering, and mathematical reasoning tasks. Our experiments show that SWiRL outperforms baseline approaches by 21.5%, 12.3%, 14.8%, 11.1%, and 15.3% in relative accuracy on GSM8K, HotPotQA, CofCA, MuSiQue, and BeerQA, respectively. Excitingly, the approach exhibits generalization across tasks: for example, training only on HotPotQA (text question-answering) improves zero-shot performance on GSM8K (a math dataset) by a relative 16.9%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fine-Tuning Small Reasoning Models for Quantum Field Theory

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Small 7B reasoning models were fine-tuned on synthetic and curated QFT problems using RL and SFT, yielding performance gains, error analysis, and public release of data and traces.

  2. WRIT: Write-Read Intensive Trajectory Synthesis for Multi-Turn User-Facing Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    WRIT is a synthesis pipeline that generates write-read intensive trajectories along axes of write-decision count and per-decision evidence burden, enabling a 4B model to outperform GPT-5.1 on τ²-bench with reduced inf...

  3. Dynamic Skill Lifecycle Management for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SLIM dynamically optimizes active external skills in agentic RL via leave-one-skill-out marginal contribution estimates and three lifecycle operations, outperforming baselines by 7.1% on ALFWorld and SearchQA while sh...

  4. $S^3$-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    S^3-R1 generates synthetic intermediate-difficulty multi-hop questions and applies dense rewards for search quality plus answer correctness, yielding up to 10% better out-of-domain generalization than baselines.

  5. Process Supervision of Confidence Margin for Calibrated LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLCM trains LLMs with a margin-enhanced process reward that widens the gap between correct and incorrect reasoning steps, improving calibration on math, code, logic, and science tasks without hurting accuracy.

  6. SCALER:Synthetic Scalable Adaptive Learning Environment for Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCALER creates adaptive synthetic environments for RL-based LLM reasoning training that outperforms fixed-dataset baselines with more stable long-term progress.

  7. Dynamic Skill Lifecycle Management for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SLIM dynamically optimizes the active external skill set in agentic RL via leave-one-skill-out marginal contribution estimates and lifecycle operations, delivering a 7.1% average gain over baselines on ALFWorld and Se...

  8. A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.

  9. DocArena: Turning Raw Documents into Controllable Training Environments for Document Search Agents

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    DocArena automates creation of multimodal document QA training data via MLLM-based structuring and cross-page reasoning pairs, yielding agents with top retrieval and QA performance in unified tests.

  10. $S^3$-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    S^3-R1 generates synthetic multi-hop questions and uses combined intermediate and final rewards to train RL models for retrieval and answering, reporting up to 10% better out-of-domain generalization.

  11. From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.AI 2025-04 accept novelty 4.0

    A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.