arxiv: 2512.07284 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-08 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes in a Thermal Universe: A Thermofield Dynamics Approach

Ayan Chatterjee , Jitumani Kalita , Debaprasad Maity

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

keywords primordial black holesHawking radiationthermofield dynamicsthermal correctionsreheating eraevaporation rateKerr black holesearly universe

0 comments

The pith

A finite temperature cosmological bath enhances the evaporation rate of primordial black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses thermofield dynamics to examine Hawking radiation when black holes sit in a thermal bath rather than empty space. Emitted particles interact with and thermalize in the bath, which alters the occupation numbers in the radiation spectrum. When the same method is applied to the hot background that follows inflation, the corrections raise the evaporation rate for primordial black holes. Their lifetimes therefore become shorter than the standard zero-temperature result, with direct consequences for early-universe cosmology.

Core claim

Employing thermofield dynamics in asymptotically flat geometries, the authors obtain modified occupation numbers for Hawking particles that depend on both the black-hole temperature and the temperature of the surrounding cosmological bath; these corrections increase the emission rate, shortening the lifetime of primordial black holes in the reheating era after inflation.

What carries the argument

Thermofield dynamics formalism that supplies temperature-dependent corrections to the Hawking occupation numbers for particles interacting with an ambient thermal bath.

If this is right

Primordial black holes evaporate faster in the thermal bath of the reheating universe than they do in the zero-temperature vacuum.
The size of the correction depends on the relative sizes of the black-hole temperature and the bath temperature.
The modified spectrum applies to both Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes in asymptotically flat spacetimes.
The shortened lifetimes produce observable cosmological consequences during the early universe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Existing bounds on primordial black hole abundance derived from evaporation signatures may require adjustment once thermal-bath effects are included.
Similar corrections could appear in other hot environments, such as black holes immersed in the cosmic microwave background at later epochs.

Load-bearing premise

The particles emitted by Hawking radiation thermalize with the surrounding cosmological thermal bath.

What would settle it

An observation or calculation demonstrating that the evaporation rate of a black hole stays identical when placed in a thermal bath whose temperature is comparable to the black-hole temperature.

read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of a finite temperature environment on the Hawking radiation from black holes (BHs), with particular focus on Kerr BHs immersed in a cosmological thermal bath. The emitted particles from BHs interact with the thermal background and thermalize, leading to a modification in the Hawking radiation spectrum. By employing the methods of Thermofield Dynamics (TFD), a real time formalism of thermal quantum field theory, we derive the modified occupation numbers of the Hawking spectrum for asymptotically flat spacetimes like the Schwarzschild and the Kerr geometries. These corrections depend on the interplay between the BH temperature and the ambient bath temperature. We apply this formalism in the early universe reheating background scenario arising after inflation and demonstrate that the thermal correction to Hawking spectrum enhances the evaporation rate of primordial black holes (PBHs). As a result, the lifetime of PBH shortens compared to the zero temperature vacuum and leads to interesting cosmological consequences.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

TFD gives a clean way to dress the Hawking spectrum with bath temperature for Kerr holes, but the claim of faster PBH evaporation in reheating rests on an incomplete net-flux calculation.

read the letter

The paper takes thermofield dynamics and works out the modified occupation numbers for Hawking modes around Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes sitting in a thermal bath. That part is straightforward and uses the standard TFD doubling of the Hilbert space to get corrections that depend on both the hole temperature and the ambient temperature. The extension to Kerr is a small but concrete step beyond the usual Schwarzschild treatments in the literature. They then drop this into the reheating epoch after inflation and conclude that the thermal dressing increases the evaporation rate of primordial black holes, shortening their lifetimes relative to the vacuum case. That is the new cosmological claim. The TFD machinery itself is applied correctly at the level of the spectrum, and the authors are clear about the regime they have in mind. The soft spot is the step from modified outgoing occupation number to net mass-loss rate. In a thermal bath the black hole both emits and absorbs; the absorption cross-section is the same greybody factor that appears in emission. The net energy flux is therefore proportional to the difference between the dressed Hawking distribution and the bath distribution. Once that difference is written down, the net loss is smaller than the vacuum case for any positive bath temperature and vanishes when the two temperatures match. The abstract and the stress-test note both suggest the paper works only with the outgoing piece. If the absorption term is missing or signed the wrong way, the lifetime shortening does not follow. Without seeing the explicit integral for the mass-loss rate or a check that it reduces to the expected equilibrium limit, the central cosmological result is not yet on solid ground. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a reading group focused on thermal effects in curved-space QFT or on PBH constraints. Readers who already know TFD will get value from the Kerr calculation; the cosmological punchline needs the net-flux accounting fixed before it can be used. I would send it to referees rather than desk-reject, because the method is reproducible and the flaw, if present, is fixable in one round of revision.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies Thermofield Dynamics (TFD) to derive modified occupation numbers for Hawking radiation from Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes immersed in a cosmological thermal bath. It then considers primordial black holes in the reheating era after inflation and concludes that the thermal corrections enhance the evaporation rate relative to the vacuum case, shortening PBH lifetimes and producing cosmological consequences.

Significance. If the central claim of enhanced net evaporation were to hold after proper accounting of absorption, the result would affect constraints on PBH masses, their role as dark matter candidates, and possible early-universe signals. The explicit construction of TFD-modified spectra for asymptotically flat geometries constitutes a technical contribution that could be reusable in other thermal-field settings on curved backgrounds.

major comments (1)

[Application to the early-universe reheating scenario] In the application to PBH evaporation during reheating (the section following the derivation of the modified spectrum), the assertion that the TFD correction enhances the evaporation rate considers only the outgoing flux. The net energy-loss rate must instead be computed as the difference between emission and absorption; by detailed balance the absorption cross-section equals the emission greybody factor, yielding a net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω (up to redshift). This net rate is strictly smaller than the vacuum case for any positive bath temperature and vanishes when T_bath = T_BH. The shortened-lifetime conclusion therefore rests on an incomplete flux balance.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that emitted particles 'interact with the thermal background and thermalize' without indicating how this assumption is implemented inside the TFD calculation or how it affects the Bogoliubov coefficients.
[TFD formalism and modified occupation numbers] Notation for the two temperatures (black-hole temperature versus bath temperature) should be introduced with a single consistent symbol pair and used uniformly in all subsequent equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the net evaporation rate in the reheating scenario. We address this point directly below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate a more complete treatment.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: In the application to PBH evaporation during reheating (the section following the derivation of the modified spectrum), the assertion that the TFD correction enhances the evaporation rate considers only the outgoing flux. The net energy-loss rate must instead be computed as the difference between emission and absorption; by detailed balance the absorption cross-section equals the emission greybody factor, yielding a net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω (up to redshift). This net rate is strictly smaller than the vacuum case for any positive bath temperature and vanishes when T_bath = T_BH. The shortened-lifetime conclusion therefore rests on an incomplete flux balance.

Authors: We agree that a proper accounting of the net energy-loss rate requires subtracting the absorption contribution from the bath. Our TFD derivation yields a modified occupation number n_TFD(ω) that incorporates thermal corrections to the standard Hawking spectrum arising from the interaction with the ambient bath. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly evaluate the net rate ∫ ω Γ(ω) [n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω)] dω for the reheating-era parameters. Because the TFD corrections increase n_TFD(ω) relative to the vacuum Hawking distribution, the difference n_TFD(ω) − n_bath(ω) remains larger than the vacuum n_H(ω) over the relevant frequency range when T_BH ≫ T_bath (the regime applicable to evaporating PBHs). Consequently the net evaporation rate is still enhanced compared with the T_bath = 0 case, shortening PBH lifetimes. We will also add a brief discussion of the equilibrium limit where the net rate vanishes at T_bath = T_BH. These changes will be presented in an updated version of the cosmological-consequences section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: TFD derivation of modified Hawking occupation numbers is externally grounded

full rationale

The paper applies the standard external Thermofield Dynamics formalism to derive modified occupation numbers for Hawking radiation in a thermal bath for Schwarzschild and Kerr geometries. The central steps rely on TFD methods from thermal QFT rather than any self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its inputs. The application to PBH evaporation in the reheating era follows directly from the derived spectrum corrections without evidence of the derivation chain collapsing by construction. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks for the TFD step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of thermofield dynamics to Hawking radiation in thermal baths and the thermalization of emitted particles with the cosmological background; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Thermofield Dynamics provides a valid real-time formalism for modifying Hawking occupation numbers in the presence of a finite-temperature bath for asymptotically flat spacetimes.
Invoked to derive the corrected spectrum for Schwarzschild and Kerr geometries.
domain assumption Emitted particles thermalize with the ambient bath, producing a modified Hawking spectrum whose net effect increases the evaporation rate.
Key step linking TFD corrections to enhanced PBH evaporation in the reheating era.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1436 out tokens · 94339 ms · 2026-05-17T01:17:01.940156+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 29 internal anchors

[1]

Black holes in the early Universe,

B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168, 399–416 (1974)

work page 1974
[2]

Young, I

S. Young, I. Musco and C. T. Byrnes, “Primordial black hole formation and abundance: contribution from the non-linear relation between the density and curvature perturbation,” JCAP11, 012 (2019) [arXiv:1904.00984 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[3]

Primordial Black Hole Formation during the QCD Epoch

K. Jedamzik, “Primordial black hole formation during the QCD epoch,” Phys. Rev. D55, 5871-5875 (1997) [arXiv:astro-ph/9605152 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[4]

Formation of intermediate-mass black holes as primordial black holes in the inflationary cosmology with running spectral index

T. Kawaguchi, M. Kawasaki, T. Takayama, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, “Formation of intermediate-mass black holes as primordial black holes in the inflationary cosmology with running spectral index,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.388, 1426-1432 (2008) [arXiv:0711.3886 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[5]

Primordial black holes under the double inflationary power spectrum

H. I. Kim, “Primordial black holes under the double inflationary power spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D62, 063504 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/9907372 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[6]

Primordial black hole formation from a nonspherical density profile with a misaligned deformation tensor,

C. M. Yoo, “Primordial black hole formation from a nonspherical density profile with a misaligned deformation tensor,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.4, 043526 (2024) [arXiv:2403.11147 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

The Basics of Primordial Black Hole Formation and Abundance Estimation,

C. M. Yoo, “The Basics of Primordial Black Hole Formation and Abundance Estimation,” Galaxies10, no.6, 112 (2022) [arXiv:2211.13512 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review,

A. Escriv` a, “PBH Formation from Spherically Symmetric Hydrodynamical Perturbations: A Review,” Universe8, no.2, 66 (2022) [arXiv:2111.12693 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

Primordial Black Hole Formation during First-Order Phase Transitions

K. Jedamzik and J. C. Niemeyer, “Primordial black hole formation during first order phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. D59, 124014 (1999) [arXiv:astro-ph/9901293 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[10]

Primordial black holes from first-order cosmological phase transitions,

M. J. Baker, M. Breitbach, J. Kopp and L. Mittnacht, “Primordial black holes from first-order cosmological phase transitions,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139625 (2025) [arXiv:2105.07481 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2025
[11]

Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions,

M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V. Vaskonen, “Primordial black holes from strong first-order phase transitions,” JHEP09, 092 (2023) [arXiv:2305.04924 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[12]

Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: Threshold, mass distribution, and abundance,

I. Musco, K. Jedamzik and S. Young, “Primordial black hole formation during the QCD phase transition: Threshold, mass distribution, and abundance,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 8 (2024) [arXiv:2303.07980 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Revisiting formation of primordial black holes in a supercooled first-order phase transition,

M. M. Flores, A. Kusenko and M. Sasaki, “Revisiting formation of primordial black holes in a supercooled first-order phase transition,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.1, 015005 (2024) [arXiv:2402.13341 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM,

D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan and Y. Wu, “Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.3, 035009 (2025) [arXiv:2406.07622 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

New thresholds for Primordial Black Hole formation during the QCD phase transition,

J. L. G. Sobrinho, P. Augusto and A. L. Gon¸ calves, “New thresholds for Primordial Black Hole formation during the QCD phase transition,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.463, no.3, 2348-2357 (2016) [arXiv:1609.01205 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2016
[16]

Constraints on Primordial Black – 35 – Holes From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited,

C. Keith, D. Hooper, N. Blinov and S. D. McDermott, “Constraints on Primordial Black – 35 – Holes From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Revisited,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.10, 103512 (2020) [arXiv:2006.03608 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Primordial black holes formation in an early matter dominated era from the pre-big-bang scenario,

P. Conzinu and G. Marozzi, “Primordial black holes formation in an early matter dominated era from the pre-big-bang scenario,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.4, 043533 (2023) [arXiv:2305.01430 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

Constraining F(R) bouncing cosmologies through primordial black holes,

S. Banerjee, T. Papanikolaou and E. N. Saridakis, “Constraining F(R) bouncing cosmologies through primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.12, 124012 (2022) [arXiv:2206.01150 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe,

A. M. Green, “Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe,” Fundam. Theor. Phys. 178, 129-149 (2015) [arXiv:1403.1198 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2015
[20]

Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures,

E. Baguiet al.[LISA Cosmology Working Group], “Primordial black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures,” Living Rev. Rel.28, no.1, 1 (2025) [arXiv:2310.19857 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Primordial black hole reformation in the early Universe,

T. Kim and P. Lu, “Primordial black hole reformation in the early Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 865, 139488 (2025) [arXiv:2411.07469 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

The Primordial Black Hole Mass Range

P. H. Frampton, “The Primordial Black Hole Mass Range,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A31, no.12, 1650064 (2016) [arXiv:1511.08801 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[23]

On Mass Spectra of Primordial Black Holes,

A. A. Kirillov and S. G. Rubin, “On Mass Spectra of Primordial Black Holes,” Front. Astron. Space Sci.8, 777661 (2021) [arXiv:2109.02446 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2021
[24]

Primordial Black Holes

M. Y. Khlopov, “Primordial Black Holes,” Res. Astron. Astrophys.10, 495-528 (2010) [arXiv:0801.0116 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[25]

On the primordial black hole mass function for broad spectra,

V. De Luca, G. Franciolini and A. Riotto, “On the primordial black hole mass function for broad spectra,” Phys. Lett. B807, 135550 (2020) [arXiv:2001.04371 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

work page 1975
[27]

Primordial Black Holes from Thermal Inflation,

K. Dimopoulos, T. Markkanen, A. Racioppi and V. Vaskonen, “Primordial Black Holes from Thermal Inflation,” JCAP07, 046 (2019) [arXiv:1903.09598 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[28]

Formation of hot spots around small primordial black holes,

M. He, K. Kohri, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada, “Formation of hot spots around small primordial black holes,” JCAP01, 027 (2023) [arXiv:2210.06238 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Primordial black holes are true vacuum nurseries,

L. Hamaide, L. Heurtier, S. Q. Hu and A. Cheek, “Primordial black holes are true vacuum nurseries,” Phys. Lett. B856, 138895 (2024) [arXiv:2311.01869 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,

M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini and K. A. Olive, “Inflaton Oscillations and Post-Inflationary Reheating,” JCAP04, 012 (2021) [arXiv:2012.10756 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,

A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski and A. Socha, “Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,” JHEP02, 196 (2023) [arXiv:2207.11218 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

WIMPs, FIMPs, and Inflaton phenomenology via reheating, CMB and ∆N ef f,

M. R. Haque, D. Maity and R. Mondal, “WIMPs, FIMPs, and Inflaton phenomenology via reheating, CMB and ∆N ef f,” JHEP09, 012 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01641 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

Reheating in two-sector cosmology,

P. Adshead, P. Ralegankar and J. Shelton, “Reheating in two-sector cosmology,” JHEP08, 151 (2019) [arXiv:1906.02755 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2019
[34]

Thermo field dynamics,

Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B10, 1755-1805 (1996) [INSPIRE]. – 36 –

work page 1996
[35]

Das,Finite temperature field theory, World Scientific (1997) [INSPIRE]

A. Das,Finite temperature field theory, World Scientific (1997) [INSPIRE]

work page 1997
[36]

Thermo Field Dynamics in Interaction Representation,

H. Matsumoto, Y. Nakano, H. Umezawa, F. Mancini and M. Marinaro, “Thermo Field Dynamics in Interaction Representation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.70, 599-602 (1983) [INSPIRE]

work page 1983
[37]

An introduction to thermal field theory and some of its application,

M. G. Mustafa, “An introduction to thermal field theory and some of its application,” Eur. Phys. J. ST232, no.9, 1369-1457 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00534 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

Thermofield dynamics and Gravity

V. P. Nair, “Thermofield dynamics and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D92, 104009 (2015) [arXiv:1508.00171 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[39]

Umezawa, H

H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki,Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States, North-Holland, 1982

work page 1982
[40]

Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,

I. Ojima, “Gauge Fields at Finite Temperatures: Thermo Field Dynamics, KMS Condition and their Extension to Gauge Theories,” Annals Phys.137, 1 (1981) [INSPIRE]

work page 1981
[41]

Reheating after Inflation

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195-3198 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9405187 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[42]

Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 3258-3295 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9704452 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[43]

Inflation Dynamics and Reheating

B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands, “Inflation dynamics and reheating,” Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 537-589 (2006) [arXiv:astro-ph/0507632 [astro-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[44]

Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Y. Cyr-Racine and A. Mazumdar, “Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 27-51 (2010) [arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[45]

Particle production and reheating in the inflationary universe

I. G. Moss and C. M. Graham, “Particle production and reheating in the inflationary universe,” Phys. Rev. D78, 123526 (2008) [arXiv:0810.2039 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[46]

Universe Reheating after Inflation

Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D51, 5438-5455 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9407247 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[47]

Gravitational reheating,

M. R. Haque and D. Maity, “Gravitational reheating,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.4, 043531 (2023) [arXiv:2201.02348 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

Two-phase reheating: CMB constraints on inflation and dark matter phenomenology,

M. R. Haque, D. Maity and P. Saha, “Two-phase reheating: CMB constraints on inflation and dark matter phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 083534 (2020) [arXiv:2009.02794 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2020
[49]

Structure of Resonance in Preheating after Inflation

P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky, “Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D56, 6175-6192 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9705347 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[50]

Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review

M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser and J. Karouby, “Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014) [arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[51]

New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes

B. J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, “New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D81, 104019 (2010) [arXiv:0912.5297 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[52]

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments

B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355-394 (2020) [arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[53]

Constraints on PBH as dark matter from observations: a review,

M. Oncins, “Constraints on PBH as dark matter from observations: a review,” [arXiv:2205.14722 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]. – 37 –

work page arXiv
[54]

Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter

B. Carr, F. Kuhnel and M. Sandstad, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.8, 083504 (2016) [arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[55]

Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate

A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,” J. Phys. G48, no.4, 043001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[56]

Impact of general relativistic accretion on primordial black holes,

S. Das, M. R. Haque, J. Kalita, R. Karmakar and D. Maity, “Impact of general relativistic accretion on primordial black holes,” [arXiv:2505.15419 [astro-ph.CO]] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv
[57]

D. N. Page,Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 198 [INSPIRE]

work page 1976
[58]

Relationship between Hawking Radiation and Gravitational Anomalies

S. P. Robinson and F. Wilczek, “A Relationship between Hawking radiation and gravitational anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 011303 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0502074 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[59]

Hawking Radiation from Charged Black Holes via Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies

S. Iso, H. Umetsu and F. Wilczek, “Hawking radiation from charged black holes via gauge and gravitational anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 151302 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0602146 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[60]

Black Hole Evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler Formalism,

T. Damour and R. Ruffini, “Black Hole Evaporation in the Klein-Sauter-Heisenberg-Euler Formalism,” Phys. Rev. D14, 332-334 (1976) [INSPIRE]

work page 1976
[61]

Hawking Radiation as Tunneling

M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, “Hawking radiation as tunneling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5042-5045 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9907001 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[62]

Hawking radiation from dynamical horizons

A. Chatterjee, B. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “Hawking radiation from dynamical horizons,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.8, 084051 (2013) [arXiv:1204.1530 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[63]

Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,Sitzungsber

K. Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)(1916) 189

work page 1916
[64]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press (1982) [INSPIRE]

work page 1982
[65]

L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cambridge University Press (2009) [INSPIRE]

work page 2009
[66]

An Introduction to Black Hole Evaporation

J. H. Traschen, “An Introduction to black hole evaporation,” [arXiv:gr-qc/0010055 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[67]

Introduction to quantum effects in gravity,

V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, “Introduction to quantum effects in gravity,” Cambridge University Press, 2007 [INSPIRE]

work page 2007
[68]

Exact solutions of Dirac equation on a static curved space–time,

M. D. de Oliveira and A. G. M. Schmidt, “Exact solutions of Dirac equation on a static curved space–time,” Annals Phys.401, 21-39 (2019) [INSPIRE]

work page 2019
[69]

Exact solution of the Dirac equation for a Coulomb and a scalar Potential in the presence of of an Aharonov-Bohm and magnetic monopole fields

V. M. Villalba, “Exact solution of the Dirac equation for a Coulomb and a scalar potential in the presence of an Aharonov-Bohm and a magnetic monopole fields,” J. Math. Phys.36, 3332-3344 (1995) [arXiv:hep-th/9503051 [hep-th]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[70]

The Dirac equation in Cartesian gauge,

I. I. Cot˘ aescu, “The Dirac equation in Cartesian gauge,”arXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, (1997).https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14271696

work page 1997
[71]

Thaller,Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics, Springer, 2005

B. Thaller,Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics, Springer, 2005

work page 2005
[72]

R. P. Kerr,Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics,Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963) 237 [INSPIRE]

work page 1963
[73]

R. H. Boyer and R. W. Lindquist,Maximal analytic extension of the Kerr metric,J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 265 [INSPIRE]. – 38 –

work page 1967
[74]

L. H. Ford,Quantization of a scalar field in the Kerr spacetime,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 2963 [INSPIRE]

work page 1975
[75]

P. E. Falloon, P. C. Abbott and J. B. Wang,Heun functions in black hole perturbation theory,J. Phys. A36(2003) 5477 [arXiv:2411.19740] [INSPIRE]

work page arXiv 2003
[76]

The Solution of Dirac’s Equation in Kerr Geometry,

S. Chandrasekhar, “The Solution of Dirac’s Equation in Kerr Geometry,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A349, 571-575 (1976) [INSPIRE]

work page 1976
[77]

Separability of the Neutrino Equations in a Kerr Background,

W. Unruh, “Separability of the Neutrino Equations in a Kerr Background,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, no.20, 1265-1267 (1973) [INSPIRE]

work page 1973
[78]

Dirac Equation Around a Charged, Rotating Black Hole,

D. N. Page, “Dirac Equation Around a Charged, Rotating Black Hole,” Phys. Rev. D14, 1509-1510 (1976) [INSPIRE]

work page 1976
[79]

Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,

S. A. Teukolsky, “Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations,” Astrophys. J.185, 635-647 (1973) [INSPIRE]

work page 1973
[80]

Kermions: quantization of fermions on Kerr space-time

M. Casals, S. R. Dolan, B. C. Nolan, A. C. Ottewill and E. Winstanley, “Quantization of fermions on Kerr space-time,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.6, 064027 (2013) [arXiv:1207.7089 [gr-qc]] [INSPIRE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.