pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11459 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.CV· cs.LG

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Overcoming Dynamics-Blindness: Training-Free Pace-and-Path Correction for VLA Models

Yanyan Zhang , Chaoda Song , Vikash Singh , Xinpeng Li , Kai Ye , Zhe Hu , Zhongzhu Pu , Yu Yin
show 1 more author
Vipin Chaudhary
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 06:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords vision-language-actionVLA modelsdynamics correctiontraining-freepace-and-pathaction chunkingroboticsinference-time operator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pace-and-path correction from a single quadratic cost overcomes dynamics blindness in vision-language-action models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Vision-Language-Action models often fail in changing environments because they are trained to predict actions from single observations, missing temporal dynamics. The paper introduces a training-free operator called Pace-and-Path Correction that can be wrapped around any existing chunked VLA model at inference time. By minimizing one quadratic cost, the method produces a solution that splits into two orthogonal parts: one adjusting the pace of execution along the intended path and the other providing a perpendicular spatial adjustment. This combined correction absorbs the effects of perceived dynamics within each action chunk, leading to better performance in dynamic scenarios without needing retraining or adding significant latency.

Core claim

From a single quadratic cost, joint minimization yields a unified solution that decomposes orthogonally into two distinct channels. The pace channel compresses execution along the planned direction, while the path channel applies an orthogonal spatial offset, jointly absorbing the perceived dynamics within the chunk window.

What carries the argument

Pace-and-Path Correction operator: a training-free closed-form inference-time wrapper that decomposes corrections orthogonally from one quadratic cost into pace compression along the planned direction and an orthogonal spatial offset.

If this is right

  • Applies to any existing chunked-action VLA model at inference time without retraining.
  • Raises success rates by up to 28.8 percent in dynamic-only environments and 25.9 percent in mixed static-dynamic settings on MoveBench.
  • Preserves temporal consistency across chunks through closed-form computation with no added latency.
  • Outperforms prior training-free wrappers and dynamic-adaptive baselines on the diagnostic benchmark.
  • Jointly corrects pace and path by absorbing observed mismatches inside each action chunk window.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The orthogonal split may extend to other sequential prediction tasks in robotics where observation windows hide velocity information.
  • Adaptive sizing of the chunk window based on measured mismatch could further reduce residual errors.
  • Physical robot deployment would test whether the quadratic-cost solution holds under real sensor noise and actuation delays.
  • Similar decompositions might address dynamics issues in non-VLA planners that rely on fixed-horizon action sequences.

Load-bearing premise

That the dynamics perceived within each action chunk window can be fully absorbed by an orthogonal decomposition of pace and path corrections derived from a single quadratic cost without introducing new inconsistencies or latency.

What would settle it

A test case with dynamics that cannot be separated into directional timing compression and perpendicular spatial offset, such as rapid rotational changes inside one chunk, would show whether performance gains disappear or new errors appear.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11459 by Chaoda Song, Kai Ye, Vikash Singh, Vipin Chaudhary, Xinpeng Li, Yanyan Zhang, Yu Yin, Zhe Hu, Zhongzhu Pu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of methods. (a) Fundamental VLA suffers from single-frame input that leaves the latter half of each chunk stale under dynamic scenes. (b) Perception augmentation requires retraining, and the motion signal is progressively diluted through the VLA stack and ego-motion. (c) Latency reduction blindly accelerates inference, breaking chunk-to-chunk consistency and typically relying on a lightweight ba… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Framework Overview. Given a baseline action chunk ∆p from a frozen VLA policy and dynamics signals (v, ˆd) from the dynamics sensor, our framework minimizes a single quadratic cost over per-chunk tracking error and correction effort. Stationarity decomposes the optimum orthogonally into two closed-form channels: a Pace Channel that absorbs the parallel component of v ˆd as a temporal compression factor α ⋆… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: MOVEBENCH Overview. MOVEBENCH treats motion regimes as the primary evaluation axis, comprising 10,000 trajectories (∼460k frames) across 10 tasks with everyday household objects randomly sampled across regimes, spanning static, regular, and irregular motion patterns at multiple difficulty levels. All non-motion factors are held identical, isolating motion as the sole variable. The latch admits a single fre… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Per-family success rate of baseline VLAs versus their PPC-equipped counterparts, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Empirical sweep of βout peaks at the closed-form theoretical value βout = 1−2 −K/T ≈ 0.083, validating the latch derivation. (b) Dynamic α from the closed-form cost outperforms any fixed compression factor, confirming the necessity of per-chunk adaptive compression. PPC-equipped VLAs surpass all comparison baselines. Among the comparison methods, BID (57.0%) and ACT (50.8%) operate as inference-time wr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Robustness to perception noise. Success rate (%) under varying magnitude noise σv and directional noise σθ on the velocity signal. PPC remains above the bare baseline across all conditions. βouter. theory validation As illustrated in Fig.5 (a), sweeping βout on irregular regimes (rand. walk and stop & go) yields a peak success rate of 68% at βout ≈ 0.08, which closely matches the theoretical value 1 − 2 −K… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The nine YCB objects sampled in MOVEBENCH. Each panel is the base-camera frame at t=0 from a demonstration episode of the corresponding task. Accelerated motion. The object is initialized with a low base speed v0 ∈ [2, 3] cm/s, common to all three tiers, and a per-episode acceleration vector whose magnitude is drawn from [2, 3], [3, 5], and [5, 9] cm/s2 for easy, medium, and hard. Decoupling v0 from the ac… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top-down (x–y) end-effector trajectories on identical seeds. Gray dashed: object trajectory (• start, × end). Red: bare baseline TCP (terminates without grasp). Green: PPC-equipped TCP (terminates at grasp). Black triangle: arm start. PPC redirects the chunk-interior path to track the moving target across all four motion regimes. Adaptive α⋆ engagement across motion families [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Wrapper internals across motion families. Top row: α ⋆ per chunk-reset; gray dotted line marks α = 1 (no compression), red dotted line marks the chunk-budget cap T /K = 8. Bottom row: observed velocity ∥v∥ (gray) and disturbance magnitude ∥A⋆∥ (colored) per chunk. The three regimes produce distinct α ⋆ profiles: flat near 1 for uniform motion, monotone-rising for accelerated motion, and transient-spiking f… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve remarkable flexibility and generalization beyond classical control paradigms. However, most prevailing VLAs are trained under a single-frame observation paradigm, which leaves them structurally blind to temporal dynamics. Consequently, these models degrade severely in non-stationary scenarios, even when trained or finetuned on dynamic datasets. Existing approaches either require expensive retraining or suffer from latency bottlenecks and poor temporal consistency across action chunks. We propose Pace-and-Path Correction, a training-free, closed-form inference-time operator that wraps any chunked-action VLA. From a single quadratic cost, joint minimization yields a unified solution that decomposes orthogonally into two distinct channels. The pace channel compresses execution along the planned direction, while the path channel applies an orthogonal spatial offset, jointly absorbing the perceived dynamics within the chunk window. We evaluate our approach on a comprehensive diagnostic benchmark MoveBench designed to isolate motion as the sole controlled variable. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms state-of-the-art training-free wrappers and dynamic-adaptive methods and improves success rates by up to 28.8% and 25.9% in absolute terms over foundational VLA models in dynamic-only and static-dynamic mixed environments, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Pace-and-Path Correction, a training-free closed-form inference-time operator for chunked-action Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models. It claims that joint minimization of a single quadratic cost produces a unified solution that decomposes orthogonally into a pace channel (temporal compression along the planned direction) and a path channel (orthogonal spatial offset), thereby absorbing perceived dynamics within each action chunk without retraining or added latency. The approach is evaluated on the diagnostic benchmark MoveBench, reporting absolute success-rate gains of up to 28.8% in dynamic-only settings and 25.9% in mixed static-dynamic environments over baseline VLAs and existing training-free wrappers.

Significance. If the orthogonal decomposition is rigorously shown to hold for arbitrary intra-chunk dynamics and the MoveBench results are statistically robust, the method would offer a lightweight, general-purpose correction layer that improves temporal consistency of existing VLAs without the cost of retraining or online adaptation. This could meaningfully advance practical deployment of VLAs in non-stationary robotics tasks.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (Method), quadratic-cost derivation: the central claim that joint minimization of one quadratic cost yields an exactly orthogonal decomposition into pace and path channels requires explicit verification that the Hessian has no cross-terms coupling the temporal (pace) and spatial (path) directions for arbitrary perceived dynamics inside the chunk window. The abstract asserts closed-form orthogonality but does not display the cost function or the eigenvector alignment argument; without this, the separability cannot be confirmed and the unified solution may require additional projections.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §4] Abstract and §4 (Experiments): success-rate improvements are stated in absolute terms but no error bars, number of trials, or statistical significance tests are mentioned; MoveBench construction details (how motion is isolated as the sole variable, chunk lengths, baseline implementations) should be expanded for reproducibility.
  2. [§3] Notation: the distinction between the planned direction vector and the perceived dynamics vector should be defined with explicit symbols before the decomposition is introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on the quadratic-cost derivation. We agree that the separability argument requires explicit algebraic verification and will expand §3 accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Method), quadratic-cost derivation: the central claim that joint minimization of one quadratic cost yields an exactly orthogonal decomposition into pace and path channels requires explicit verification that the Hessian has no cross-terms coupling the temporal (pace) and spatial (path) directions for arbitrary perceived dynamics inside the chunk window. The abstract asserts closed-form orthogonality but does not display the cost function or the eigenvector alignment argument; without this, the separability cannot be confirmed and the unified solution may require additional projections.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript presented the decomposition at a conceptual level without the full derivation. The quadratic cost is J(Δp, Δτ) = (1/2)‖Δp − v̂·Δτ‖²_Q + (λ/2)‖Δτ − τ̂‖², where Δp is the spatial path offset and Δτ the temporal pace scalar. Because the velocity direction v̂ is fixed within the chunk and the two variables act along orthogonal subspaces (spatial perpendicular to v̂, temporal along v̂), the Hessian is block-diagonal with zero cross-block. Consequently the joint minimizer factors exactly into independent pace and path closed-form solutions without further projection. We will insert the explicit cost function, the Hessian matrix, and the eigenvector argument in the revised §3 to make this verification self-contained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Closed-form orthogonal decomposition from quadratic cost presented without reduction to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is described as a training-free closed-form operator obtained by joint minimization of a single quadratic cost, yielding an orthogonal split into pace (temporal compression) and path (spatial offset) channels. No equations or text in the provided abstract reduce this result to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional tautology; the claim is advanced as an independent mathematical construction rather than a renaming or statistical artifact of prior data. The absence of load-bearing self-citations or ansatz smuggling keeps the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks, warranting only a minor score for the general risk that any quadratic-cost claim could hide unstated cross terms.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that dynamics within action chunks can be captured by orthogonal decomposition of a quadratic cost; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A single quadratic cost minimization can be decomposed orthogonally into independent pace and path correction channels that jointly absorb perceived dynamics.
    This is the explicit basis for the unified solution stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1175 out tokens · 41851 ms · 2026-05-15T06:09:33.754707+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dynamic behavior cloning with temporal feature prediction: Enhancing robotic arm manipulation in moving object tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 10:5209–5216, 2025

    Yifan Zhang, Ruiping Wang, and Xilin Chen. Dynamic behavior cloning with temporal feature prediction: Enhancing robotic arm manipulation in moving object tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 10:5209–5216, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Towards generalizable robotic manipulation in dynamic environments

    Heng Fang, Shangru Li, Shuhang Wang, Xuan Xi, Dingkang Liang, and Xiang Bai. Towards generalizable robotic manipulation in dynamic environments. 2026

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22153 (2026)

    Haozhe Xie, Beichen Wen, Jia Zheng, Zhaoxi Chen, Fangzhou Hong, Haiwen Diao, and Ziwei Liu. Dynamicvla: A vision-language-action model for dynamic object manipulation.ArXiv, abs/2601.22153, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Sycara, Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Dhruv Batra, Xiaolong Wang, Sebastian Scherer, Zsolt Kira, Fei Xia, and Yonatan Bisk

    Yafei Hu, Quanting Xie, Vidhi Jain, Jonathan Francis, Jay Patrikar, Nikhil Varma Keetha, Seungchan Kim, Yaqi Xie, Tianyi Zhang, Shibo Zhao, Yu Quan Chong, Chen Wang, Katia P. Sycara, Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Dhruv Batra, Xiaolong Wang, Sebastian Scherer, Zsolt Kira, Fei Xia, and Yonatan Bisk. Toward general-purpose robots via foundation models: A survey ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AI

    Yueen Ma, Zixing Song, Yuzheng Zhuang, Jianye Hao, and Irwin King. A survey on vision- language-action models for embodied ai.ArXiv, abs/2405.14093, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy

    Octo Model Team, Dibya Ghosh, Homer Rich Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, Tobias Kreiman, Charles Xu, Jianlan Luo, You Liang Tan, Pannag R. Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Ted Xiao, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea Finn, and Sergey Levine. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.ArXiv, abs/2405.12213, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Krzysztof Choromanski, Tianli Ding, Danny Driess, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Chelsea Finn, Peter R. Florence, Chuyuan Fu, Montse Gonzalez Arenas, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Kehang Han, Karol Hausman, Alexan- der Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Nikhil J. Joshi, Ryan C. Julian, Dmitry Ka...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Paul Foster, Grace Lam, Pannag R. Sanketi, Quan Vuong, Thomas Kollar, Benjamin Burchfiel, Russ Tedrake, Dorsa Sadigh, Sergey Levine, Percy Liang, and Chelsea Finn. Openvla: An open-source vision-language-action model.ArXiv, abs/2406.09246, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsch, Lucy Xiaoyang Shi, James Tanner, Quan Vuong, Anna Walling, Haohuan Wang, and Ury Zhilinsky. π0: A visi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware

    Tony Zhao, Vikash Kumar, Sergey Levine, and Chelsea Finn. Learning fine-grained bimanual manipulation with low-cost hardware.ArXiv, abs/2304.13705, 2023. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44:1684 – 1704, 2023

    Cheng Chi, Siyuan Feng, Yilun Du, Zhenjia Xu, Eric Cousineau, Benjamin Burchfiel, and Shu- ran Song. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44:1684 – 1704, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    Nvidia, Johan Bjorck, Fernando Castañeda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, LinxiJimFan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, Joel Jang, Zhenyuan Jiang, Jan Kautz, Kaushil Kundalia, Lawrence Lao, Zhiqi Li, Zongyu Lin, Kevin Lin, Guilin Liu, Edith Llontop, Loic Magne, Ajay Mandlekar, Avnish Narayan, Soroush Nasiriany, Scott Reed, You Li...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning

    Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qian Liu, Yuke Zhu, and Peter Stone. Libero: Benchmarking knowledge transfer for lifelong robot learning.ArXiv, abs/2306.03310, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7:7327–7334, 2021

    Oier Mees, Lukás Hermann, Erick Rosete-Beas, and Wolfram Burgard. Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7:7327–7334, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Flowvla: Visual chain of thought-based motion reasoning for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18269, 2025

    Zhide Zhong, Haodong Yan, Junfeng Li, Xiangcheng Liu, Xin Gong, Tianran Zhang, Wenx- uan Song, Jiayi Chen, Xinhu Zheng, Hesheng Wang, and Haoang Li. Flowvla: Visual chain of thought-based motion reasoning for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18269, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Ryoo, and Juan Carlos Niebles

    Yu Fang, Kanchana Ranasinghe, Le Xue, Honglu Zhou, Juntao Tan, Ran Xu, Shelby Heinecke, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese, Danielle Albers Szafir, Mingyu Ding, Michael S. Ryoo, and Juan Carlos Niebles. Robotic vla benefits from joint learning with motion image diffusion. ArXiv, abs/2512.18007, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10345 (2024) 13

    Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Shuaiyi Huang, Jianfeng Gao, Hal Daum’e, Andrey Kolobov, Furong Huang, and Jianwei Yang. Tracevla: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies.ArXiv, abs/2412.10345, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19236 (2025) 1, 13

    Hao Shi, Bin Xie, Yingfei Liu, Lin Sun, Feng Liu, Tiancai Wang, Erjin Zhou, Haoqiang Fan, Xiangyu Zhang, and Gao Huang. Memoryvla: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language- action models for robotic manipulation.ArXiv, abs/2508.19236, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04447 (2025) 3, 7, 14

    Wenyao Zhang, Hongsi Liu, Zekun Qi, Yunnan Wang, Xinqiang Yu, Jiazhao Zhang, Runpei Dong, Jiawei He, He Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, Li Yi, Wenjun Zeng, and Xin Jin. Dreamvla: A vision-language-action model dreamed with comprehensive world knowledge.ArXiv, abs/2507.04447, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    WorldVLA: Towards Autoregressive Action World Model

    Jun Cen, Chaohui Yu, Hangjie Yuan, Yuming Jiang, Siteng Huang, Jiayan Guo, Xin Li, Yibing Song, Hao Luo, Fan Wang, Deli Zhao, and Hao Chen. Worldvla: Towards autoregressive action world model.ArXiv, abs/2506.21539, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    4d-vla: Spatiotemporal vision- language-action pretraining with cross-scene calibration.ArXiv, abs/2506.22242, 2025

    Jiahui Zhang, Yurui Chen, Yueming Xu, Ze Huang, Yanpeng Zhou, Yuan Yuan, Xinyue Cai, Guowei Huang, Xingyue Quan, Hang Xu, and Li Zhang. 4d-vla: Spatiotemporal vision- language-action pretraining with cross-scene calibration.ArXiv, abs/2506.22242, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Leave no observation behind: Real-time correction for vla action chunks.ArXiv, abs/2509.23224, 2025

    Kohei Sendai, Maxime Alvarez, Tatsuya Matsushima, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Leave no observation behind: Real-time correction for vla action chunks.ArXiv, abs/2509.23224, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Wovr: World models as reliable simulators for post-training vla policies with rl.ArXiv, abs/2602.13977, 2026

    Zhennan Jiang, Shan Zhou, Yutong Jiang, Zefang Huang, Mingjie Wei, Yuhui Chen, Tianxing Zhou, Zhen Guo, Hao Lin, Quanlu Zhang, Yu Wang, Haoran Li, Chao Yu, and Dongbin Zhao. Wovr: World models as reliable simulators for post-training vla policies with rl.ArXiv, abs/2602.13977, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    3dflowaction: Learning cross-embodiment manipulation from 3d flow world model.ArXiv, abs/2506.06199, 2025

    Hongyan Zhi, Peihao Chen, Siyuan Zhou, Dongjie Yu, Quanxi Wu, Lei Han, and Mingkui Tan. 3dflowaction: Learning cross-embodiment manipulation from 3d flow world model.ArXiv, abs/2506.06199, 2025. 11

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Lilac: Language-conditioned object-centric optical flow for open-loop trajectory generation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 11:6767–6774, 2026

    Motonari Kambara, Koki Seno, Tomoya Kaichi, Yanan Wang, and Komei Sugiura. Lilac: Language-conditioned object-centric optical flow for open-loop trajectory generation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 11:6767–6774, 2026

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Wenxuan Song, Jiayi Chen, Pengxiang Ding, Han Zhao, Wei Zhao, Zhide Zhong, Zongyuan Ge, Jun Ma, and Haoang Li. Pd-vla: Accelerating vision-language-action model integrated with action chunking via parallel decoding.2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 13162–13169, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Faster: Toward efficient autoregressive vision language action modeling via neural action tokenization.ArXiv, abs/2512.04952, 2025

    Yicheng Liu, Shiduo Zhang, Zibin Dong, Baijun Ye, Tianyuan Yuan, Xiaopeng Yu, Linqi Yin, Chenhao Lu, Junhao Shi, Luca Jiang-Tao Yu, Liangtao Zheng, Tao Jiang, Jingjing Gong, Xipeng Qiu, and Hang Zhao. Faster: Toward efficient autoregressive vision language action modeling via neural action tokenization.ArXiv, abs/2512.04952, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Y ., and Levine, S

    Kevin Black, Manuel Y . Galliker, and Sergey Levine. Real-time execution of action chunking flow policies.ArXiv, abs/2506.07339, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Bidirectional decoding: Improving action chunking via guided test-time sampling

    Yuejiang Liu, Jubayer Ibn Hamid, Annie Xie, Yoonho Lee, Maximilian Du, and Chelsea Finn. Bidirectional decoding: Improving action chunking via guided test-time sampling. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Adaptive action chunking for robotic imitation learning.Biomimetics, 2026

    Qingpeng Wen, Haomin Zhu, Yuepeng Zhang, Linzhong Xia, Bo Gao, and Zhuozhen Li. Adaptive action chunking for robotic imitation learning.Biomimetics, 2026

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Tic-vla: A think-in-control vision-language-action model for robot navigation in dynamic environments

    Zhiyu Huang, Yun Zhang, Johnson Liu, Rui Song, Chen Tang, and Jiaqi Ma. Tic-vla: A think-in-control vision-language-action model for robot navigation in dynamic environments. ArXiv, abs/2602.02459, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Julian Ibarz, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Tomas Jackson, Sally Jesmonth, Nikhil J. Joshi, Ryan C. Julian, Dmitry Kalashnikov, Yuheng Kuang, Isabel Leal, Kuang-Huei Lee, Sergey Levine, Yao Lu, Utsa...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Abhishek Padalkar, Acorn Pooley, Ajinkya Jain, Alex Bewley, Alex Herzog, Alex Irpan, Alexander Khazatsky, Anant Rai, Anikait Singh, Anthony Brohan, Antonin Raffin, Ayzaan Wahid, Ben Burgess-Limerick, Beomjoon Kim, Bernhard Schölkopf, Brian Ichter, Cewu Lu, Charles Xu, Chelsea Finn, Chenfeng Xu, Cheng Chi, Chenguang Huang, Christine Chan, Chuer Pan, Chuyua...

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Manuel Y . Galliker, Dibya Ghosh, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Szymon Jakubczak, Tim Jones, Liyiming Ke, Devin LeBlanc, Sergey Levine, Adrian Li-Bell, Mohith Mothukuri, Suraj Nair, Karl Pertsc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics

    Mustafa Shukor, Dana Aubakirova, Francesco Capuano, Pepijn Kooijmans, Steven Palma, Adil Zouitine, Michel Aractingi, Caroline Pascal, Martino Russi, Andrés Marafioti, Simon Alibert, Matthieu Cord, Thomas Wolf, and Rémi Cadène. Smolvla: A vision-language-action model for affordable and efficient robotics.ArXiv, abs/2506.01844, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Hybridvla: Collaborative diffusion and autoregression in a unified vision-language-action model.ArXiv, abs/2503.10631, 2025

    Jiaming Liu, Hao Chen, Pengju An, Zhuoyang Liu, Renrui Zhang, Chenyang Gu, Xiaoqi Li, Ziyu Guo, Sixiang Chen, Mengzhen Liu, Chengkai Hou, Mengdi Zhao, KC alex Zhou, Pheng- Ann Heng, and Shanghang Zhang. Hybridvla: Collaborative diffusion and autoregression in a unified vision-language-action model.ArXiv, abs/2503.10631, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation.ArXiv, abs/2410.07864, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Zhang, Daniel Pfrommer, Chaoyi Pan, Nikolai Matni, and Max Simchowitz

    Thomas T. Zhang, Daniel Pfrommer, Chaoyi Pan, Nikolai Matni, and Max Simchowitz. Action chunking and exploratory data collection yield exponential improvements in behavior cloning for continuous control. 2025. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 280254015

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Ling, Fanbo Xiang, Derek Yang, Xuanlin Li, Stone Tao, Zhiao Huang, Zhiwei Jia, and Hao Su

    Tongzhou Mu, Z. Ling, Fanbo Xiang, Derek Yang, Xuanlin Li, Stone Tao, Zhiao Huang, Zhiwei Jia, and Hao Su. Maniskill: Generalizable manipulation skill benchmark with large-scale demonstrations. InNeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Maniskill2: A unified benchmark for generalizable manipulation skills.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04659, 2023

    Jiayuan Gu, Fanbo Xiang, Xuanlin Li, Z. Ling, Xiqiang Liu, Tongzhou Mu, Yihe Tang, Stone Tao, Xinyue Wei, Yuan Yao, Xiao Yuan, Pengwei Xie, Zhiao Huang, Rui Chen, and Hao Su. Maniskill2: A unified benchmark for generalizable manipulation skills.ArXiv, abs/2302.04659, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots

    Soroush Nasiriany, Abhiram Maddukuri, Lance Zhang, Adeet Parikh, Aaron Lo, Abhishek Joshi, Ajay Mandlekar, and Yuke Zhu. Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots.ArXiv, abs/2406.02523, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Shiduo Zhang, Zhe Xu, Peiju Liu, Xiaopeng Yu, Yuan Li, Qinghui Gao, Zhaoye Fei, Zhangyue Yin, Zuxuan Wu, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Xipeng Qiu. Vlabench: A large-scale benchmark for language-conditioned robotics manipulation with long-horizon reasoning tasks.2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 11142–11152, 2024

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Lehnert, J

    Ben Burgess-Limerick, Christopher F. Lehnert, J. Leitner, and Peter Corke. Dgbench: An open-source, reproducible benchmark for dynamic grasping.2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 3218–3224, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Mariam Hassan, Sebastian Stapf, Ahmad Rahimi, Pedro Martelleto Bressane Rezende, Yasaman Haghighi, David Brüggemann, Isinsu Katircioglu, Lin Zhang, Xiaoran Chen, Suman Saha, 13 Marco Cannici, Elie Aljalbout, Botao Ye, Xi Wang, Aram Davtyan, Mathieu Salzmann, Davide Scaramuzza, Marc Pollefeys, Paolo Favaro, and Alexandre Alahi. Gem: A generalizable ego-vis...

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Lamp: Learning vision-language-action policies with 3d scene flow as latent motion prior

    Xinkai Wang, Chenyi Wang, Yifu Xu, Ming Ye, Fugang Zhang, Jialin Tian, Xinyu Zhan, Lifeng Zhu, Cewu Lu, and Lixin Yang. Lamp: Learning vision-language-action policies with 3d scene flow as latent motion prior. 2026

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Future-vla: Forecasting unified trajectories under real-time execution

    Jingjing Fan, Yushan Liu, Shoujie Li, Botao Ren, Siyuan Li, Xiao-Ping Zhang, Wenbo Ding, and Zhidong Deng. Future-vla: Forecasting unified trajectories under real-time execution. ArXiv, abs/2602.15882, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Self-correcting vla: Online action refinement via sparse world imagination.ArXiv, abs/2602.21633, 2026

    Chen-Yu Liu, Wentao Tan, Lei Zhu, Fengling Li, Jingjing Li, Guoli Yang, and Heng Tao Shen. Self-correcting vla: Online action refinement via sparse world imagination.ArXiv, abs/2602.21633, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Vla-cache: Efficient vision-language-action manipulation via adaptive token caching

    Siyu Xu, Yunke Wang, Chenghao Xia, Di Zhu, Tao Huang, and Chang Xu. Vla-cache: Efficient vision-language-action manipulation via adaptive token caching. 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Think twice, act once: Token-aware compression and action reuse for efficient inference in vision-language-action models.ArXiv, abs/2505.21200, 2025

    Xudong Tan, Yaoxin Yang, Peng Ye, Jiali Zheng, Bizhe Bai, Xinyi Wang, Jia Hao, and Tao Chen. Think twice, act once: Token-aware compression and action reuse for efficient inference in vision-language-action models.ArXiv, abs/2505.21200, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Discrete diffusion vla: Bring- ing discrete diffusion to action decoding in vision-language-action policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20072, 2025

    Zhixuan Liang, Yizhuo Li, Tianshuo Yang, Chengyue Wu, Sitong Mao, Tian Nian, Liuao Pei, Shunbo Zhou, Xiaokang Yang, Jiangmiao Pang, et al. Discrete diffusion vla: Bring- ing discrete diffusion to action decoding in vision-language-action policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20072, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Hirt: Enhancing robotic control with hierarchical robot transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05273, 2024

    Jianke Zhang, Yanjiang Guo, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Yucheng Hu, Chengming Shi, and Jianyu Chen. Hirt: Enhancing robotic control with hierarchical robot transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05273, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05964 (2025)

    Kevin Black, Allen Z. Ren, Michael Equi, and Sergey Levine. Training-time action conditioning for efficient real-time chunking.ArXiv, abs/2512.05964, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12978 (2026)

    Yufeng Liu, Hang Yu, Juntu Zhao, Bocheng Li, Di Zhang, Ming-Zhe Li, Wenxuan Wu, Ying- dong Hu, Junyuan Xie, Junliang Guo, Dequan Wang, and Yang Gao. Learning native continua- tion for action chunking flow policies.ArXiv, abs/2602.12978, 2026. A Full Closed-Form Mathematical Derivation This appendix provides the complete mathematical derivation of the Pace...

    work page arXiv 2026