pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11951 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.RO

Recognition: no theorem link

From Reaction to Anticipation: Proactive Failure Recovery through Agentic Task Graph for Robotic Manipulation

Sheng Xu , Ruixing Jin , Huayi Zhou , Bo Yue , Guanren Qiao , Yunxin Tai , Yueci Deng , Kui Jia
show 1 more author
Guiliang Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords robotic manipulationfailure recoverytask graphagentic systemproactive planningbimanual taskslong-horizon execution
0
0 comments X

The pith

AgentChord pre-enriches robotic task graphs with anticipatory recovery branches so failures trigger immediate corrective actions without re-planning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents AgentChord as a system that represents a manipulation task as a directed graph before execution begins. It adds branches that encode context-aware corrections for likely failures, then uses a conductor agent to monitor progress with low-latency checks and switch to the right branch when a deviation appears. This replaces the usual detect-then-reason-then-recover loop with a prepared response that runs at the moment of failure. A reader would care because long-horizon bimanual tasks in real environments routinely encounter small disruptions that currently cause full restarts or long delays; a pre-planned graph could keep the robot moving forward with far less interruption.

Core claim

AgentChord models a manipulation task as a directed task graph that a composer agent first structures from the nominal plan; an arranger agent then augments the graph with anticipatory recovery branches that specify context-aware corrective behaviors; a conductor agent compiles these into executable transitions and uses low-latency monitors to detect deviations and trigger the pre-compiled recoveries without invoking re-planning.

What carries the argument

A directed task graph enriched before execution with anticipatory recovery branches that the conductor agent traverses using low-latency monitors.

If this is right

  • Long-horizon bimanual manipulation tasks achieve higher success rates because recovery happens at the moment of detection rather than after a separate reasoning step.
  • Execution efficiency rises because the system avoids repeated calls to a planner after each failure.
  • Real-world robotic autonomy increases in unstructured settings where small disturbances are common but predictable in type.
  • The same graph structure can support multiple specialized agents working in coordination without central re-planning overhead.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the recovery branches prove comprehensive enough, similar pre-compilation techniques could be applied to other sequential decision systems that currently rely on online replanning.
  • The approach may trade off some flexibility for speed, suggesting a useful boundary condition: tasks whose failure modes are hard to enumerate in advance may still need hybrid reactive layers.
  • Extending the conductor to update the graph online from observed failures could turn the static anticipatory design into an incrementally learning one.

Load-bearing premise

The set of possible failures that matter can be anticipated and turned into pre-specified recovery branches without leaving important cases uncovered or creating conflicting transitions.

What would settle it

Run the system on a long-horizon bimanual task that contains a failure mode absent from the pre-added branches; measure whether the conductor can still recover without falling back to full re-planning or failing outright.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11951 by Bo Yue, Guanren Qiao, Guiliang Liu, Huayi Zhou, Kui Jia, Ruixing Jin, Sheng Xu, Yueci Deng, Yunxin Tai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We introduce AgentChord, an agentic system that integrates anticipatory failure recovery capability, enabling both efficient and effective recovery actions. In the example, blue lines represent nominal actions, red lines indicate intrinsic failures or external disturbances, and pink lines depict recovery actions proactively anticipated by AgentChord. Abstract—Although robotic manipulation has made signific… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The framework of AgentChord with an example. It involves three agents: the Task Structuring Agent constructs the nominal task graph with semantic sub-goals and constraints; the Recovery Orchestration Agent augments this graph with anticipatory recovery branches; and the Execution Compilation Agent compiles both nominal and recovery transitions into executable, interruptible programs with monitors. During e… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We collected a variety of object instances for each task [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the failure recovery process in AgentChord for six real-world tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Failure detection and recovery of AgentChord in dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of the hardware system, consisting of an Ag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of failure detection and recovery of AgentChord in three simulation tasks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of the initial and task-completion frames of AgentChord across six real-world tasks. Across different trials, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of AgentChord on the dual-arm pour water task in a cluttered environment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Although robotic manipulation has made significant progress, reliable execution remains challenging because task failures are inevitable in dynamic and unstructured environments. To handle such failures, existing frameworks typically follow a stepwise detect-reason-recover pipeline, which often incurs high latency and limited robustness due to delayed reasoning and reactive planning. Inspired by the human capability to anticipate and proactively plan for potential failures, we introduce AgentChord, an agentic system that models a manipulation task as a directed task graph. Before execution, this graph is enriched with anticipatory recovery branches that specify context-aware corrective behaviors, enabling immediate and targeted responses when failures occur. Specifically, AgentChord operates through a choreography of specialized agents: a composer that structures the nominal task graph, an arranger that augments the graph with anticipatory recovery branches, and a conductor that compiles and coordinates executable transitions using low-latency monitors to detect deviations and trigger pre-compiled recoveries without re-planning. Empirical studies on diverse long-horizon bimanual manipulation tasks demonstrate that AgentChord substantially improves success rates and execution efficiency, advancing the reliability and autonomy of real-world robotic systems. The project page is available at: https://shengxu.net/AgentChord/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces AgentChord, a multi-agent system for robotic manipulation that represents tasks as directed graphs. A composer agent builds the nominal task graph, an arranger agent augments it with anticipatory recovery branches specifying context-aware corrections, and a conductor agent compiles executable transitions monitored by low-latency detectors that trigger pre-compiled recoveries without re-planning. The central empirical claim is that this proactive enrichment yields substantially higher success rates and better execution efficiency than reactive detect-reason-recover pipelines on diverse long-horizon bimanual manipulation tasks.

Significance. If the reported gains are shown to arise from genuine anticipation rather than exhaustive pre-specification of recoveries, the work would offer a concrete mechanism for reducing latency in failure handling and could improve reliability in unstructured environments. The agentic task-graph choreography is a novel construction that, if accompanied by reproducible code or detailed failure-coverage analysis, would strengthen the case for shifting from reactive to proactive recovery in manipulation frameworks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Empirical studies] Abstract and empirical evaluation section: The claim that AgentChord 'substantially improves success rates and execution efficiency' is the load-bearing result, yet no baselines, quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate definition, time-to-completion), trial counts, or statistical controls are supplied. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the gains exceed what exhaustive pre-planning of recoveries would achieve.
  2. [AgentChord architecture] System overview and conductor description: The conductor is stated to trigger only pre-compiled transitions on monitor-detected deviations. The manuscript provides no analysis or experiment showing that the failures encountered during evaluation lie outside the recovery branches supplied by the arranger; if they overlap, the low-latency advantage is explained by pre-enumeration rather than anticipation, directly undermining the central contrast with reactive pipelines.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The roles of composer, arranger, and conductor are introduced with evocative names but lack a concise comparison table or diagram clarifying how their outputs interface with existing task-planning libraries.
  2. [Abstract] The project page URL is given but no statement is made about code or data release, which would be helpful for assessing reproducibility of the bimanual task results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The comments identify important areas where additional clarity and evidence are needed to support the central claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Empirical studies] Abstract and empirical evaluation section: The claim that AgentChord 'substantially improves success rates and execution efficiency' is the load-bearing result, yet no baselines, quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate definition, time-to-completion), trial counts, or statistical controls are supplied. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the gains exceed what exhaustive pre-planning of recoveries would achieve.

    Authors: We agree that the empirical claims require more explicit documentation. In the revised manuscript we will expand the evaluation section to define success rate and time-to-completion precisely, report the exact number of trials per task, include direct comparisons against reactive detect-reason-recover baselines, and add statistical controls (means, standard deviations, and significance tests). These additions will allow readers to evaluate whether the observed improvements exceed those obtainable by exhaustive pre-enumeration alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [AgentChord architecture] System overview and conductor description: The conductor is stated to trigger only pre-compiled transitions on monitor-detected deviations. The manuscript provides no analysis or experiment showing that the failures encountered during evaluation lie outside the recovery branches supplied by the arranger; if they overlap, the low-latency advantage is explained by pre-enumeration rather than anticipation, directly undermining the central contrast with reactive pipelines.

    Authors: The arranger generates branches from predicted, context-aware failure modes rather than exhaustive enumeration. To address the concern directly, the revised version will include a dedicated analysis subsection that categorizes all observed failures into those covered by the pre-compiled branches versus those requiring on-the-fly reactive planning. This will quantify the anticipatory coverage and demonstrate that the latency reduction arises from proactive branch selection rather than complete pre-specification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new agentic framework with empirical validation only

full rationale

The paper presents AgentChord as a novel construction: a directed task graph built by a composer agent, augmented with pre-specified recovery branches by an arranger, and executed via low-latency monitors by a conductor. All claims rest on empirical success rates and efficiency metrics from long-horizon bimanual tasks. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The reported improvements are measured outcomes of the implemented system rather than quantities derived by construction from the inputs. This is a standard empirical systems paper with no load-bearing derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The approach rests on domain assumptions about task graph representability and failure predictability; no explicit free parameters or independently evidenced invented entities are described.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Manipulation tasks can be effectively modeled as directed task graphs.
    Core modeling choice stated in the abstract for both nominal and recovery paths.
  • domain assumption Potential failures can be anticipated sufficiently to allow pre-compilation of context-aware recovery branches.
    Enables the shift from reactive to proactive planning before execution.
invented entities (2)
  • Anticipatory recovery branches no independent evidence
    purpose: To specify context-aware corrective behaviors added to the task graph
    New structural element introduced to enable immediate responses.
  • Composer-arranger-conductor agent choreography no independent evidence
    purpose: To structure, augment, and execute the enriched task graph
    Specialized multi-agent roles central to the system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1343 out tokens · 103616 ms · 2026-05-13T05:09:25.837688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BoostAPR: Boosting Automated Program Repair via Execution-Grounded Reinforcement Learning with Dual Reward Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BoostAPR improves automated program repair by using execution-grounded RL with a sequence-level assessor and line-level credit allocator, reaching 40.7% on SWE-bench Verified and strong cross-language results.

  2. BoostAPR: Boosting Automated Program Repair via Execution-Grounded Reinforcement Learning with Dual Reward Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BoostAPR uses supervised fine-tuning on verified fixes, dual sequence- and line-level reward models from execution feedback, and PPO to reach 40.7% on SWE-bench Verified with strong cross-language results.

  3. BoostAPR: Boosting Automated Program Repair via Execution-Grounded Reinforcement Learning with Dual Reward Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BoostAPR boosts automated program repair by training a sequence-level assessor and line-level credit allocator from execution outcomes, then applying them in PPO to reach 40.7% on SWE-bench Verified.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Foundation models defining a new era in vision: a survey and outlook.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    Muhammad Awais, Muzammal Naseer, Salman Khan, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Hisham Cholakkal, Mubarak Shah, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. Foundation models defining a new era in vision: a survey and outlook.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Towards a unified understanding of robot ma- nipulation: A comprehensive survey,

    Shuanghao Bai, Wenxuan Song, Jiayi Chen, Yuheng Ji, Zhide Zhong, Jin Yang, Han Zhao, Wanqi Zhou, Wei Zhao, Zhe Li, et al. Towards a unified understanding of robot manipulation: A comprehensive survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10903, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Trends and challenges in robot manipulation.Science, 364(6446):eaat8414, 2019

    Aude Billard and Danica Kragic. Trends and challenges in robot manipulation.Science, 364(6446):eaat8414, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    Johan Bjorck, Fernando Casta ˜neda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi Fan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    $\pi_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Es- mail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al. Pi0: A vision-language-action flow model for general robot con- trol.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts

    Nicolas Carion, Laura Gustafson, Yuan-Ting Hu, Shoub- hik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Didac Suris, Chaitanya Ryali, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haitham Khedr, Andrew Huang, et al. Sam 3: Segment anything with concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Keeping a clear separation between goals and plans

    Costin Caval, Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni, and Patrick Taillibert. Keeping a clear separation between goals and plans. InInternational Workshop on Engineering Multi- Agent Systems, pages 15–39. Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulation

    Tianxing Chen, Zanxin Chen, Baijun Chen, Zijian Cai, Yibin Liu, Zixuan Li, Qiwei Liang, Xianliang Lin, Yi- heng Ge, Zhenyu Gu, et al. Robotwin 2.0: A scalable data generator and benchmark with strong domain random- ization for robust bimanual robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18088, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Racer: Rich language-guided failure recovery policies for imitation learning

    Yinpei Dai, Jayjun Lee, Nima Fazeli, and Joyce Chai. Racer: Rich language-guided failure recovery policies for imitation learning. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 15657–15664. IEEE, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Embodichain: An end-to-end, gpu-accelerated, and modular platform for building gen- eralized embodied intelligence, November 2025

    EmbodiChain Developers. Embodichain: An end-to-end, gpu-accelerated, and modular platform for building gen- eralized embodied intelligence, November 2025. URL https://github.com/DexForce/EmbodiChain

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Hierarchical reinforcement learn- ing with the maxq value function decomposition.Journal of artificial intelligence research, 13:227–303, 2000

    Thomas G Dietterich. Hierarchical reinforcement learn- ing with the maxq value function decomposition.Journal of artificial intelligence research, 13:227–303, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Vision-language models as success detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07280, 2023

    Yuqing Du, Ksenia Konyushkova, Misha Denil, Akhil Raju, Jessica Landon, Felix Hill, Nando De Freitas, and Serkan Cabi. Vision-language models as success detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07280, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00371 , year=

    Jiafei Duan, Wilbert Pumacay, Nishanth Kumar, Yi Ru Wang, Shulin Tian, Wentao Yuan, Ranjay Krishna, Dieter Fox, Ajay Mandlekar, and Yijie Guo. Aha: A vision-language-model for detecting and reasoning over failures in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00371, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Manipulate-anything: Automating real-world robots using vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18915, 2024

    Jiafei Duan, Wentao Yuan, Wilbert Pumacay, Yi Ru Wang, Kiana Ehsani, Dieter Fox, and Ranjay Kr- ishna. Manipulate-anything: Automating real-world robots using vision-language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18915, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Score the steps, not just the goal: Vlm-based subgoal evaluation for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19524, 2025

    Ramy ElMallah, Krish Chhajer, and Chi-Guhn Lee. Score the steps, not just the goal: Vlm-based subgoal evaluation for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19524, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Survey of imitation learning for robotic manipulation.International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 3(4):362–369, 2019

    Bin Fang, Shidong Jia, Di Guo, Muhua Xu, Shuhuan Wen, and Fuchun Sun. Survey of imitation learning for robotic manipulation.International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 3(4):362–369, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Anygrasp: Robust and efficient grasp perception in spatial and temporal domains.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 39(5):3929–3945, 2023

    Hao-Shu Fang, Chenxi Wang, Hongjie Fang, Minghao Gou, Jirong Liu, Hengxu Yan, Wenhai Liu, Yichen Xie, and Cewu Lu. Anygrasp: Robust and efficient grasp perception in spatial and temporal domains.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 39(5):3929–3945, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(5):701–739, 2025

    Roya Firoozi, Johnathan Tucker, Stephen Tian, Anirudha Majumdar, Jiankai Sun, Weiyu Liu, Yuke Zhu, Shuran Song, Ashish Kapoor, Karol Hausman, et al. Foundation models in robotics: Applications, challenges, and the future.The International Journal of Robotics Research, 44(5):701–739, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation using low-cost whole-body teleoperation

    Zipeng Fu, Tony Z Zhao, and Chelsea Finn. Mobile aloha: Learning bimanual mobile manipulation using low-cost whole-body teleoperation. In8th Annual Con- ference on Robot Learning, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Anytask: an automated task and data generation framework for advancing sim-to-real policy learning

    Ran Gong, Xiaohan Zhang, Jinghuan Shang, Maria Vit- toria Minniti, Jigarkumar Patel, Valerio Pepe, Riedana Yan, Ahmet Gundogdu, Ivan Kapelyukh, Ali Abbas, et al. Anytask: an automated task and data generation framework for advancing sim-to-real policy learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17853, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Gemini 3: Introducing the latest gemini ai model from google, 2025

    Google. Gemini 3: Introducing the latest gemini ai model from google, 2025. URL https://blog.google/ products-and-platforms/products/gemini/gemini-3/

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Doremi: Grounding language model by detecting and recovering from plan-execution misalignment

    Yanjiang Guo, Yen-Jen Wang, Lihan Zha, and Jianyu Chen. Doremi: Grounding language model by detecting and recovering from plan-execution misalignment. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 12124–12131. IEEE, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    A survey on deep reinforcement learning algorithms for robotic manipulation.Sensors, 23(7): 3762, 2023

    Dong Han, Beni Mulyana, Vladimir Stankovic, and Samuel Cheng. A survey on deep reinforcement learning algorithms for robotic manipulation.Sensors, 23(7): 3762, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models

    Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Ted Xiao, Harris Chan, Jacky Liang, Pete Florence, Andy Zeng, Jonathan Tompson, Igor Mordatch, Yevgen Chebotar, et al. Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models

    Wenlong Huang, Chen Wang, Ruohan Zhang, Yunzhu Li, Jiajun Wu, and Li Fei-Fei. V oxposer: Composable 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Rekep: Spatio- temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01652, 2024

    Wenlong Huang, Chen Wang, Yunzhu Li, Ruohan Zhang, and Li Fei-Fei. Rekep: Spatio-temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01652, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Real-world robot applications of foundation models: A review.Advanced Robotics, 38(18):1232–1254, 2024

    Kento Kawaharazuka, Tatsuya Matsushima, Andrew Gambardella, Jiaxian Guo, Chris Paxton, and Andy Zeng. Real-world robot applications of foundation models: A review.Advanced Robotics, 38(18):1232–1254, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    A software package for sequential quadratic programming.Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raumfahrt, 1988

    Dieter Kraft. A software package for sequential quadratic programming.Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raumfahrt, 1988

    work page 1988

  30. [30]

    What foundation models can bring for robot learning in manipulation: A survey

    Dingzhe Li, Yixiang Jin, Yuhao Sun, Yong A, Hongze Yu, Jun Shi, Xiaoshuai Hao, Peng Hao, Huaping Liu, Xiang Li, et al. What foundation models can bring for robot learning in manipulation: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research, page 02783649251390579, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    The developments and challenges toward dexter- ous and embodied robotic manipulation: A survey.IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2025

    Gaofeng Li, Ruize Wang, Peisen Xu, Qi Ye, and Jiming Chen. The developments and challenges toward dexter- ous and embodied robotic manipulation: A survey.IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control

    Jacky Liang, Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Peng Xu, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, Pete Florence, and Andy Zeng. Code as policies: Language model programs for embod- ied control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07753, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Sim- pact: Simulation-enabled action planning using vision- language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05955, 2025

    Haowen Liu, Shaoxiong Yao, Haonan Chen, Jiawei Gao, Jiayuan Mao, Jia-Bin Huang, and Yilun Du. Sim- pact: Simulation-enabled action planning using vision- language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.05955, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Self-corrected multimodal large language model for end-to-end robot manipulation.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2405, 2024

    Jiaming Liu, Chenxuan Li, Guanqun Wang, Lily Lee, Kaichen Zhou, Sixiang Chen, Chuyan Xiong, Jiaxin Ge, Renrui Zhang, and Shanghang Zhang. Self-corrected multimodal large language model for end-to-end robot manipulation.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2405, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection

    Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Qing Jiang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, et al. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 38–

    work page

  36. [36]

    RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Rdt-1b: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07864, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Reflect: Summarizing robot experiences for failure explanation and correction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15724, 2023

    Zeyi Liu, Arpit Bahety, and Shuran Song. Reflect: Summarizing robot experiences for failure explanation and correction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15724, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12224 , year=

    Weifeng Lu, Minghao Ye, Zewei Ye, Ruihan Tao, Shuo Yang, and Bo Zhao. Robofac: A comprehensive frame- work for robotic failure analysis and correction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.12224, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Toward robotic manipulation.Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1(1):1–28, 2018

    Matthew T Mason. Toward robotic manipulation.Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 1(1):1–28, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural lan- guage supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural lan- guage supervision. InInternational conference on ma- chine learning, pages 8748–8763. PmLR, 2021

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Agentic llm-based robotic systems for real-world applications: a review on their agenticness and ethics.Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12: 1605405, 2025

    Emmanuel K Raptis, Athanasios Ch Kapoutsis, and Elias B Kosmatopoulos. Agentic llm-based robotic systems for real-world applications: a review on their agenticness and ethics.Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 12: 1605405, 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    OpenAI GPT-5 System Card

    Aaditya Singh, Adam Fry, Adam Perelman, Adam Tart, Adi Ganesh, Ahmed El-Kishky, Aidan McLaughlin, Aiden Low, AJ Ostrow, Akhila Ananthram, et al. Openai gpt-5 system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models

    Ishika Singh, Valts Blukis, Arsalan Mousavian, Ankit Goyal, Danfei Xu, Jonathan Tremblay, Dieter Fox, Jesse Thomason, and Animesh Garg. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11302, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Zhiyong Wu, Zhenyu Wu, Fangzhi Xu, Yian Wang, Qiushi Sun, Chengyou Jia, Kanzhi Cheng, Zichen Ding, Liheng Chen, Paul Pu Liang, and Yu Qiao

    Zihao Wang, Shaofei Cai, Guanzhou Chen, Anji Liu, Xiaojian Ma, and Yitao Liang. Describe, explain, plan and select: Interactive planning with large language mod- els enables open-world multi-task agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01560, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Foundationpose: Unified 6d pose estimation and tracking of novel objects

    Bowen Wen, Wei Yang, Jan Kautz, and Stan Birchfield. Foundationpose: Unified 6d pose estimation and tracking of novel objects. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17868–17879, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Phoenix: A motion-based self-reflection framework for fine-grained robotic action correction

    Wenke Xia, Ruoxuan Feng, Dong Wang, and Di Hu. Phoenix: A motion-based self-reflection framework for fine-grained robotic action correction. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Confer- ence, pages 6981–6990, 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    General- ized simulated annealing algorithm and its application to the thomson model.Physics Letters A, 233(3):216–220, 1997

    Yang Xiang, DY Sun, Wei Fan, and XG Gong. General- ized simulated annealing algorithm and its application to the thomson model.Physics Letters A, 233(3):216–220, 1997

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    Maniagent: An agentic framework for general robotic manipulation

    Yi Yang, Kefan Gu, Yuqing Wen, Hebei Li, Yucheng Zhao, Tiancai Wang, and Xudong Liu. Maniagent: An agentic framework for general robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11660, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Fpc-vla: A vision-language-action framework with a supervisor for failure prediction and correction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04018, 2025

    Yifan Yang, Zhixiang Duan, Tianshi Xie, Fuyu Cao, Pinxi Shen, Peili Song, Piaopiao Jin, Guokang Sun, Shaoqing Xu, Yangwei You, et al. Fpc-vla: A vision-language-action framework with a supervisor for failure prediction and correction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04018, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Multireact: Multimodal tools augmented reasoning-acting traces for embodied agent planning

    Zhouliang Yu, Jie Fu, Yao Mu, Chenguang Wang, Lin Shao, and Yaodong Yang. Multireact: Multimodal tools augmented reasoning-acting traces for embodied agent planning. InICLR, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Generative artificial intelligence in robotic manipulation: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03464, 2025

    Kun Zhang, Peng Yun, Jun Cen, Junhao Cai, Didi Zhu, Hangjie Yuan, Chao Zhao, Tao Feng, Michael Yu Wang, Qifeng Chen, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in robotic manipulation: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03464, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Sim2real vla: Zero-shot generalization of synthesized skills to realistic manipu- lation

    Runyi Zhao, Sheng Xu, Ruixing Jin, Yueci Deng, Yunxin Tai, Kui Jia, and Guiliang Liu. Sim2real vla: Zero-shot generalization of synthesized skills to realistic manipu- lation. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026

    work page 2026

  53. [53]

    A survey of embodied learning for object-centric robotic manipulation.Machine Intelligence Research, pages 1– 39, 2025

    Ying Zheng, Lei Yao, Yuejiao Su, Yi Zhang, Yi Wang, Sicheng Zhao, Yiyi Zhang, and Lap-Pui Chau. A survey of embodied learning for object-centric robotic manipulation.Machine Intelligence Research, pages 1– 39, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Evaluating

    Zhi Zheng, Qian Feng, Hang Li, Alois Knoll, and Jianxiang Feng. Evaluating uncertainty-based failure detection for closed-loop llm planners.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00430, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Code-as-monitor: Constraint-aware visual programming for reactive and proactive robotic failure detection

    Enshen Zhou, Qi Su, Cheng Chi, Zhizheng Zhang, Zhongyuan Wang, Tiejun Huang, Lu Sheng, and He Wang. Code-as-monitor: Constraint-aware visual programming for reactive and proactive robotic failure detection. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 6919–6929, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    You only teach once: Learn one-shot bimanual robotic manipulation from video demonstrations, 2025

    Huayi Zhou, Ruixiang Wang, Yunxin Tai, Yueci Deng, Guiliang Liu, and Kui Jia. You only teach once: Learn one-shot bimanual robotic manipulation from video demonstrations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14208, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Challenges and outlook in robotic manipulation of deformable objects.IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 29(3):67–77, 2022

    Jihong Zhu, Andrea Cherubini, Claire Dune, David Navarro-Alarcon, Farshid Alambeigi, Dmitry Berenson, Fanny Ficuciello, Kensuke Harada, Jens Kober, Xiang Li, et al. Challenges and outlook in robotic manipulation of deformable objects.IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 29(3):67–77, 2022. APPENDIXA HARDWARESYSTEM Dual-Arm Robot.In this paper, we focus on ...

    work page 2022