pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16506 · v1 · pith:C73MBSKQnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Rapidly Rotating Neutron Star Collapse in Massive Scalar-Tensor Theories

Jos\'e Carlos Olvera M. , Daniela D. Doneva , Pablo Cerd\'a-Dur\'an , Jos\'e A. Font , Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords neutron starsgravitational collapsescalar-tensor theoriesgravitational wavesscalar radiationnumerical relativityrotating starsblack hole formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Collapsing scalarized neutron stars emit scalar radiation that breaks the observational degeneracy with general relativity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a three-dimensional numerical evolution code for neutron stars in massive scalar-tensor theories, built as a modified Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura formalism that includes a nonminimally coupled massive scalar field while preserving standard hydrodynamics. The code is used to simulate the collapse of rapidly rotating scalarized neutron stars to black holes and to track both tensor and scalar radiation. For the models examined, the tensor gravitational-wave signals match those produced by equivalent stars in general relativity, creating an observational degeneracy. Scalar radiation, however, carries roughly 10^{-3} solar masses of energy in units of c squared, which is orders of magnitude larger than the tensor quadrupolar emission of about 10^{-7} solar masses c squared, and this scalar output grows stronger when the initial rotation is faster. A reader would care because the scalar signal supplies a concrete, potentially observable channel for testing whether gravity includes a massive scalar field.

Core claim

Using full 3D numerical evolutions, the authors demonstrate that rapidly rotating scalarized neutron stars collapsing to black holes produce tensorial gravitational-wave emission indistinguishable from their general relativity counterparts. The degeneracy is broken by scalar radiation emitted during the process, which carries an energy of approximately 10^{-3} solar masses c^2, orders of magnitude larger than the quadrupolar gravitational-wave energy of 10^{-7} solar masses c^2. Rapid rotation allows for larger scalar field amplitudes, enhancing the scalar signal, which could serve as an observational probe of massive scalar-tensor theories.

What carries the argument

Modified BSSN formalism with a nonminimally coupled massive scalar field that evolves alongside the metric and matter and tracks the emission of scalar radiation.

If this is right

  • Tensor gravitational-wave signals from these collapses are observationally identical to those expected in general relativity.
  • Scalar radiation supplies a signal four orders of magnitude stronger than the tensor quadrupolar component.
  • Faster initial rotation increases the sustained scalar-field amplitude and therefore the radiated scalar energy.
  • The scalar channel could function as a direct observational probe of massive scalar-tensor gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A detected scalar-wave burst without a corresponding deviation in the tensor waveform would constitute positive evidence for a massive scalar field.
  • The same degeneracy-breaking pattern may appear in other dynamical events such as binary mergers or core-collapse supernovae that involve scalarized compact objects.
  • Future gravitational-wave observatories tuned to scalar polarization modes could be calibrated against the energy scale reported here.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical implementation accurately captures the coupled dynamics of the metric, fluid, and scalar field without introducing uncontrolled artifacts during the collapse.

What would settle it

Detection of a neutron-star collapse whose tensor gravitational-wave waveform matches general-relativity predictions while the total energy in scalar radiation reaches approximately 10^{-3} solar masses c squared.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16506 by Daniela D. Doneva, Jos\'e A. Font, Jos\'e Carlos Olvera M., Pablo Cerd\'a-Dur\'an, Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Constant angular momentum sequences for ro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The figure is organized into four panels. The top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The figure shows the central scalar field (top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Time evolution of the central rest-mass density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Top panel) The time evolution of the ratio be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: From top to bottom, the rest-mass density, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Top panels: evolution of the gravitational mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: shows the time evolution of the (l, m) = (2, 0) component of Ψ4 for models MST F th and GR F th, ex￾tracted at a finite radius. There is an initial burst of junk radiation related to the initial perturbation introduced to trigger the collapse, after which the actual signal follows. Regardless of the theory, the GW signal shows a distinc￾tive burst morphology, with the peak of the emission as￾sociated with… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The gravitational radiation from the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Top panel: scalar field extracted at a radius of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Top panel: scalar field extracted at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Instantaneous frequency for the scalar field at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Central density and scalar field evolution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: A star undergoing spontaneous scalarization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a full 3D numerical evolution code to study neutron stars in massive-scalar-tensor theories. The code is embedded in the Einstein Toolkit framework and its implementation constitutes a modified version of the Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura formalism with an additional nonminimally coupled scalar field. The approach we follow preserves the standard hydrodynamic evolution for matter fields, allowing eventually for a straightforward inclusion of more microphysical effects and better flexibility. Using this code, we examine the gravitational collapse of rapidly rotating, scalarized neutron stars to a black hole by exploring the influence of the scalar field on the dynamical features of the process and on the gravitational-wave emission. We find that for the configurations studied in this work, there is an observational degeneracy in the tensorial gravitational-wave emission between collapsing scalarized stars and their counterparts in general relativity. However, this degeneracy can be broken through the emission of scalar radiation, which carries an energy of ~10^-3 M_sun c^2. This is orders of magnitude higher than the quadrupolar emission (~10^-7 M_sun c^2) and might be used as an observational probe of modified gravity. We also find that rapid rotation can enhance this signal, since fast rotating stars can sustain larger scalar field amplitudes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a 3D numerical relativity code embedded in the Einstein Toolkit that implements a modified BSSN formalism including a nonminimally coupled massive scalar field while retaining standard hydrodynamic evolution. The authors evolve the collapse of rapidly rotating scalarized neutron stars to black holes and report that the tensor gravitational-wave emission is observationally degenerate with the corresponding general-relativity configurations, but that scalar radiation carries an energy of order 10^{-3} M_sun c^2 (orders of magnitude above the tensor quadrupole), with rapid rotation enhancing the scalar amplitude and thus the signal.

Significance. If the reported scalar-radiation energy scale is numerically robust, the work supplies a concrete, potentially observable channel for breaking degeneracies between massive scalar-tensor theories and general relativity in strong-field dynamical events. The code architecture that preserves standard hydrodynamics is a practical strength that facilitates future microphysical extensions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results on scalar radiation energy] The central observational claim—that scalar radiation of ~10^{-3} M_sun c^2 breaks the tensor-wave degeneracy—rests on the accuracy of the scalar-field flux extracted during the rapid collapse phase. The manuscript provides no convergence tests, resolution studies, or error budget for the scalar energy (implicit in the results on gravitational-wave emission and energy ratios). Without these, it is impossible to rule out systematic effects from artificial viscosity, outer-boundary treatment, or finite-radius extraction in the modified BSSN system.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and title use slightly inconsistent phrasing ('massive-scalar-tensor theories' versus 'Massive Scalar-Tensor Theories'); adopt a single convention.
  2. [Methods] Explicitly state the numerical values chosen for the scalar mass and non-minimal coupling strength in the initial-data and evolution sections, and discuss their sensitivity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the potential significance of the scalar radiation channel. We address the major comment on the numerical robustness of the scalar energy extraction below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central observational claim—that scalar radiation of ~10^{-3} M_sun c^2 breaks the tensor-wave degeneracy—rests on the accuracy of the scalar-field flux extracted during the rapid collapse phase. The manuscript provides no convergence tests, resolution studies, or error budget for the scalar energy (implicit in the results on gravitational-wave emission and energy ratios). Without these, it is impossible to rule out systematic effects from artificial viscosity, outer-boundary treatment, or finite-radius extraction in the modified BSSN system.

    Authors: We agree that dedicated convergence tests and an error budget specifically for the scalar radiation energy are necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 4.3) presenting resolution studies performed at three grid resolutions (low, medium, and high). The scalar energy extracted at finite radius converges to within approximately 8% between the medium and high resolutions, consistent with the expected second-order accuracy of the underlying scheme. We have also included explicit tests varying the extraction radius (from 100M to 200M) and the location of the outer boundary, demonstrating that the reported energy of order 10^{-3} M_sun c^2 changes by less than 5% under these variations. Regarding artificial viscosity, the hydrodynamic sector is evolved with the standard GR implementation already validated in prior work; the scalar-field coupling does not alter the viscosity parameters. These additions provide a quantitative error estimate and address the principal systematic concerns raised. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results follow from direct numerical evolution of the modified BSSN system.

full rationale

The paper implements a 3D numerical code based on a modified BSSN formalism with nonminimally coupled massive scalar field, evolves initial data for rapidly rotating scalarized neutron stars, and reports computed quantities such as tensor GW energy (~10^{-7} M_sun c^2) and scalar radiation energy (~10^{-3} M_sun c^2) extracted from the evolved fields. These outputs are generated by time-stepping the coupled Einstein-scalar-hydro equations rather than by fitting parameters to the target observables or by any self-referential definition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the central observational claim (degeneracy broken by scalar emission) is an emergent simulation result, not an analytic identity. Self-citations, if present, are not required to justify the reported energy scales.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on the validity of the modified BSSN evolution equations for the coupled metric-scalar system and on the assumption that the chosen massive scalar-tensor parameters produce stable scalarized initial data that collapse as described.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar mass and non-minimal coupling strength
    These theory parameters control the onset and amplitude of scalarization and are selected to produce the configurations whose collapse is studied.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The modified BSSN formalism with nonminimally coupled scalar field preserves the standard hydrodynamic evolution and accurately evolves the coupled system to black-hole formation.
    This is the foundational numerical framework stated in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • massive scalar field no independent evidence
    purpose: Additional degree of freedom that scalarizes neutron stars and radiates during collapse.
    The scalar field is part of the massive scalar-tensor theory under investigation; the paper provides no independent falsifiable prediction for its mass or coupling outside the simulated energy values.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5787 in / 1455 out tokens · 67334 ms · 2026-05-20T16:12:53.708838+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Boundary conditions At the outer boundary of the computational grid, we assume all geometric quantities to behave as outgoing spherical waves propagating at the speed of light and we impose Sommerfeld radiation conditions like the ones dis- cussed on [82] to avoid spurious reflections. Hence, each spacetime quantity at the boundary,f(r, t), is expressed a...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2022

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astro- phys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration), The Astrophysical Journal Letters995, L18 (2025), arXiv:2508.18080

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Col- laboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, and A. G. Abac, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18082 (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    A. G. Abacet al., arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2508.18079 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Srivastava, D

    V. Srivastava, D. Davis, K. Kuns, P. Landry, S. Ballmer, M. Evans, E. D. Hall, J. Read, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, The Astrophysical Journal931, 22 (2022). 20

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Hildet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity28, 094013 (2011)

    S. Hildet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity28, 094013 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Satoet al., Journal of Physics: Conference Series840, 012010 (2017)

    S. Satoet al., Journal of Physics: Conference Series840, 012010 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    J. Luo, L. S. Chen, H. Z. Duan, Y. G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, V. Milyukov, M. Sazhin, C. G. Shao, V. T. Toth, H. B. Tu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, H. C. Yeh, M. S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, V. Zharov, and Z. B. Zhou, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 035010 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), Living Rev. Rel.25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Aggarwal, O

    N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, D. Blas, A. Bauswein, G. Cella, S. Clesse, A. M. Cruise, V. Domcke, S. El- lis, D. G. Figueroa, G. Franciolini, C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, A. Geraci, M. Goryachev, H. Grote, M. Hindmarsh, A. Ito, J. Kopp, S. M. Lee, K. Martineau, J. McDonald, F. Muia, N. Mukund, D. Ottaway, M. Peloso, K. Peters, F. Quevedo, A. Ricciardone, A. Ringwald, J...

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.19019 (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.19020 (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, and the KAGRA Collaboration, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.19021 (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al.(ET), JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Bertiet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 243001 (2015)

    E. Bertiet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 243001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Penrose, Phys

    R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    work page 1965

  20. [20]

    Spera, A

    M. Spera, A. A. Trani, and M. Mencagli, Galaxies10, 10.3390/galaxies10040076 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies10040076 2022

  21. [21]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity9, 2093 (1992)

    work page 2093

  22. [22]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev.124, 925 (1961)

    work page 1961

  23. [23]

    Jordan, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik157, 112 (1959)

    P. Jordan, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik157, 112 (1959)

    work page 1959

  24. [24]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    J. Zhao, P. C. C. Freire, M. Kramer, L. Shao, and N. Wex, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 11LT01 (2022), arXiv:2201.03771 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    P. C. C. Freire and N. Wex, Living Rev. Rel.27, 5 (2024), arXiv:2407.16540 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    F. M. Ramazano˘ glu and F. Pretorius, Physical Review D93, 064005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    S. S. Yazadjiev, D. D. Doneva, and D. Popchev, Phys. Rev. D93, 084038 (2016), arXiv:1602.04766 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    H. O. Silva, A. M. Holgado, A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 181101 (2021), arXiv:2004.01253 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi- GBM, INTEGRAL), Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Nakamura, Progress of Theoretical Physics65, 1876 (1981)

    T. Nakamura, Progress of Theoretical Physics65, 1876 (1981)

    work page 1981

  32. [32]

    R. F. Stark and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 891 (1985)

    work page 1985

  33. [33]

    Harada, H

    T. Harada, H. Iguchi, and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D68, 024002 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Novak, A&A376, 606 (2001)

    J. Novak, A&A376, 606 (2001)

    work page 2001

  35. [35]

    Shibata, T

    M. Shibata, T. W. Baumgarte, and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D61, 044012 (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [36]

    Baiotti, I

    L. Baiotti, I. Hawke, P. J. Montero, F. L¨ offler, L. Rez- zolla, N. Stergioulas, J. A. Font, and E. Seidel, Phys. Rev. D71, 024035 (2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Reisswig, R

    C. Reisswig, R. Haas, C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, P. M¨ osta, D. Pollney, and E. Schnetter, Physical Re- view D87, 064023 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Dietrich and S

    T. Dietrich and S. Bernuzzi, Phys. Rev. D91, 044039 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Baiotti, I

    L. Baiotti, I. Hawke, and L. Rezzolla, Classical and Quantum Gravity24, S187 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Camelio, T

    G. Camelio, T. Dietrich, and S. Rosswog, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society480, 5272 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Margalit, B

    B. Margalit, B. D. Metzger, and A. M. Beloborodov, Physical Review Letters115, 171101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Novak, Phys

    J. Novak, Phys. Rev. D57, 4789 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    Rosca-Mead, U

    R. Rosca-Mead, U. Sperhake, C. J. Moore, M. Agathos, D. Gerosa, and C. D. Ott, Physical Review D102, 044010 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Harada, T

    T. Harada, T. Chiba, K.-i. Nakao, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D55, 2024 (1997)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    M. A. Scheel, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D51, 4236 (1995)

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    Shibata, K

    M. Shibata, K. Nakao, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7304 (1994)

    work page 1994

  47. [47]

    Long-lived inverse chirp signals from core collapse in massive scalar-tensor gravity

    U. Sperhake, C. J. Moore, R. Rosca, M. Agathos, D. Gerosa, and C. D. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 201103 (2017), arXiv:1708.03651 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Rosca-Mead, C

    R. Rosca-Mead, C. J. Moore, M. Agathos, and U. Sperhake, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 134003 (2019), arXiv:1903.09704 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Geng, H.-J

    C.-Q. Geng, H.-J. Kuan, and L.-W. Luo, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 780 (2020), arXiv:2005.11629 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Asakawa and Y

    N. Asakawa and Y. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. D108, 044060 (2023), arXiv:2308.15052 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Huang, C.-Q

    D. Huang, C.-Q. Geng, and H.-J. Kuan, Classical and Quantum Gravity38, 245006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    H.-J. Kuan, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 161103 (2021), arXiv:2103.11999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Kuroda and M

    T. Kuroda and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D107, 103025 (2023), arXiv:2302.09853 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Rosca-Mead, M

    R. Rosca-Mead, M. Agathos, C. J. Moore, and U. Sperhake, Phys. Rev. D107, 124040 (2023), arXiv:2302.04995 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D59, 024007 (1998)

    work page 1998

  56. [56]

    Shibata and T

    M. Shibata and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D52, 5428 (1995)

    work page 1995

  57. [57]

    Shibata, K

    M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, H. Okawa, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D89, 084005 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2220 (1993)

    work page 1993

  59. [59]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Far` ese, Phys. Rev. D54, 1474 (1996)

    work page 1996

  60. [60]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotiriou, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Ji and L

    P. Ji and L. Shao, Physical Review D112, 104030 (2025). 21

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    K. V. Staykov, F. M. Ramazano˘ glu, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2604.21298 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    H.-J. Kuan, K. Van Aelst, A. T.-L. Lam, and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D108, 064057 (2023), arXiv:2309.01709 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [65]

    Novak, Phys

    J. Novak, Phys. Rev. D58, 064019 (1998)

    work page 1998

  65. [66]

    ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, S

    K. ¨Unl¨ ut¨ urk, S. Tuna, O. K. Yamak, and F. M. Ra- mazano˘ glu, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 061401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [67]

    Rizzo, R

    M. Rizzo, R. Haas, S. R. Brandt, Z. Etienne, D. Fergu- son, L. T. Sanches, B.-J. Tsao, L. Werneck, D. Boyer, G. Bozzola, C.-H. Cheng, S. Cupp, P. Diener, T. P. Jacques, L. Ji, H. Macpherson, I. Markin, E. Schnetter, W. Tichy, S. Tootle, Y. Xu, M. Zilh ˜A£o, Y. Zlochower, M. Alcubierre, D. Alic, G. Allen, M. Ansorg, F. G. L. Armengol, M. Babiuc-Hamilton, L...

    work page 2025

  67. [68]

    Stergioulas and J

    N. Stergioulas and J. L. Friedman, The Astrophysical Journal444, 306 (1995)

    work page 1995

  68. [69]

    Komatsu, Y

    H. Komatsu, Y. Eriguchi, and I. Hachisu, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society237, 355 (1989)

    work page 1989

  69. [70]

    Komatsu, Y

    H. Komatsu, Y. Eriguchi, I. Hachisu, H. Komatsu, Y. Eriguchi, and I. Hachisu, MNRAS239, 153 (1989)

    work page 1989

  70. [71]

    G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, The Astrophysical Journal398, 203 (1992)

    work page 1992

  71. [72]

    D. D. Doneva, S. S. Yazadjiev, N. Stergioulas, and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D88, 084060 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [73]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, JCAP11, 019, arXiv:1607.03299 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [74]

    J. L. Friedman, J. R. Ipser, R. D. Sorkin, J. L. Friedman, J. R. Ipser, R. D. Sorkin, Friedman, J. L., Ipser, J. R., Sorkin, and R. D., ApJ325, 722 (1988)

    work page 1988

  74. [75]

    A quasi-radial stability criterion for rotating relativistic stars

    K. Takami, L. Rezzolla, and S. Yoshida, MNRAS416, L1 (2011), arXiv:1105.3069 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [76]

    Szewczyk, D

    P. Szewczyk, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, and P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, APJ990, 199 (2025), arXiv:2507.05453 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    A. T.-L. Lam, K. V. Staykov, H.-J. Kuan, D. D. Doneva, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D111, 104030 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [78]

    R. F. P. Mendes and N. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. D93, 124035 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [79]

    Witek, M

    H. Witek, M. Zilhao, G. Bozzola, C.-H. Cheng, A. Dima, M. Elley, G. Ficarra, T. Ikeda, R. Luna, C. Richards, N. Sanchis-Gual, and H. Silva, Canuda: a public nu- merical relativity library to probe fundamental physics (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    Schnetter, S

    E. Schnetter, S. H. Hawley, and I. Hawke, Classical and Quantum Gravity21, 1465 (2004)

    work page 2004

  80. [81]

    C. Bona, J. Mass´ o, E. Seidel, and J. Stela, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 600 (1995)

    work page 1995

Showing first 80 references.