Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 132 references

TNG SAM: Bridging Hydrodynamical Complexity and Semi-Analytic Efficiency to Model Galaxy Formation

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A calibrated semi-analytic model reproduces hydrodynamical galaxy and halo properties within 30 percent accuracy out to redshift 6.

desk verdict TNG SAM is a finished hybrid model with five targeted updates to Santa Cruz, calibrated to match TNG baryon cycling in 10^10-10^12 Msun halos to ~30%, but the match is by construction and generalization outside that window is unshown. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.18352 v1 pith:OE5UAP7K submitted 2026-06-16 astro-ph.GA

Osase Omoruyi , Bryan A. Terrazas , Yossi Oren , Austen Gabrielpillai , Viraj Pandya , Rachel S. Somerville , Amiel Sternberg , Lars E. Hernquist This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyformationsemi-analyticmodelshydrodynamicalsimulationsbaryoncyclingevolutionstellarfeedbackmetalcirculationcosmologicalmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces updates to a semi-analytic model for galaxy formation, including new ways to handle halo gas re-accretion, cooling without a strict cold or hot mode split, explicit treatment of outflows at galactic and halo scales, star formation efficiency, and the movement of metals. These updates are calibrated so that the model matches the flow of gas and metals as well as overall galaxy and halo properties from hydrodynamical simulations in a specific mass range. The match holds to within roughly 30 percent out to redshift 6. A sympathetic reader cares because this provides an efficient way to model galaxy evolution over the large volumes that future surveys will observe, something full hydrodynamical simulations struggle to do at scale.

What carries the argument

The updated semi-analytic model that incorporates targeted changes to gas cycling and feedback processes to align with hydrodynamical simulation results.

What would settle it

A comparison where the model's predicted stellar masses or hot halo gas masses deviate by more than 30 percent from those in the hydrodynamical simulation at redshifts or masses outside the calibration sample would disprove the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

With updates to halo gas re-accretion efficiency, a cooling model that goes beyond the traditional cold or hot mode split, explicit galactic and halo outflows, star formation efficiency, and metal circulation between galaxies and surroundings, the model reproduces the gas and metal flows from galaxy to halo scales as well as global properties within 30 percent accuracy out to redshift 6 after calibration on stellar feedback dominated galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The calibration performed only on stellar feedback-dominated galaxies in halos from about 10 billion to 1 trillion solar masses captures the key baryon cycling physics needed for accuracy at all redshifts and for all galaxy properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Such a model enables study of galaxy evolution across large cosmological volumes needed for future observational surveys.
  • The complex physics of gas and metal flows in galaxy formation can be captured in an efficient analytic framework.
  • Global properties of galaxies and halos are matched to within 30 percent accuracy across a range of redshifts.
  • The approach bridges the detail of hydrodynamical simulations with the speed of semi-analytic methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Rapid parameter variation studies become possible that would be too costly in full hydrodynamical simulations.
  • Calibration to a broader range of halo masses could extend the model's reach to different galaxy populations.
  • Direct comparisons with wide-field survey data could become more feasible with this efficient modeling tool.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the TNG SAM, an updated version of the Santa Cruz semi-analytic model incorporating five changes (halo gas re-accretion efficiency, a cooling model beyond the cold/hot dichotomy, explicit galactic- and halo-scale outflows, star formation efficiency, and metal circulation parameters) that are calibrated to reproduce baryon cycling and global properties (stellar mass, hot halo gas, metals) from the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical simulation for stellar-feedback-dominated galaxies in the halo mass range ~10^10 < M_200 < 10^12 M_⊙, achieving agreement within ≲30% out to z=6.

Significance. If the calibrated parameters capture essential baryon cycling physics rather than fitting the narrow calibration domain, the result would be significant for enabling efficient modeling of galaxy evolution over the large cosmological volumes needed for future surveys while retaining key aspects of hydrodynamical complexity; however, the presented evidence consists solely of post-calibration agreement without independent validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reproduction of TNG gas flows, metal circulation, stellar mass, and hot halo gas mass to ≲30% is achieved by explicit calibration of the five model updates to TNG data in the stated mass range; the manuscript provides no independent validation tests outside ~10^10–10^12 M_⊙ or in AGN-feedback regimes, which is load-bearing for the claim that the updates enable accuracy across redshifts and properties.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no details are supplied on the procedure used to choose or constrain the five free parameters (halo gas re-accretion efficiency, cooling model parameters, outflow parameters, star formation efficiency, metal circulation parameters), making it impossible to determine whether the reported match reflects captured physics or is by construction within the fitted parameter space.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report and for highlighting the need for greater clarity in the abstract regarding the calibration domain and parameter selection. We agree that revisions are warranted to avoid any implication of independent validation or unspecified fitting procedures. We respond to each major comment below and will update the abstract and, where appropriate, the methods section in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reproduction of TNG gas flows, metal circulation, stellar mass, and hot halo gas mass to ≲30% is achieved by explicit calibration of the five model updates to TNG data in the stated mass range; the manuscript provides no independent validation tests outside ~10^10–10^12 M_⊙ or in AGN-feedback regimes, which is load-bearing for the claim that the updates enable accuracy across redshifts and properties.

    Authors: We agree that the reported agreement is the direct result of calibration to TNG within 10^10 < M_200 < 10^12 M_⊙ for stellar-feedback-dominated galaxies and that no independent validation outside this range or in AGN-feedback regimes is presented. The abstract already qualifies the results as calibrated, but we will revise it to state explicitly that the ≲30% accuracy holds within the calibrated domain and redshift range, without claiming broader applicability. This addresses the concern that the claim is load-bearing; the revised wording will limit the scope to the stellar-feedback regime where the updates were tuned. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no details are supplied on the procedure used to choose or constrain the five free parameters (halo gas re-accretion efficiency, cooling model parameters, outflow parameters, star formation efficiency, metal circulation parameters), making it impossible to determine whether the reported match reflects captured physics or is by construction within the fitted parameter space.

    Authors: The full manuscript includes a methods section that describes the iterative calibration process used to constrain the five parameters against TNG baryon-cycle diagnostics. To ensure the abstract is self-contained, we will add a brief clause summarizing that the parameters were adjusted via targeted matching to TNG gas and metal flow rates, star-formation efficiencies, and outflow loadings within the stated mass range. This will clarify that the procedure is not arbitrary but is documented in the paper, while still acknowledging that the match is by design within the calibration space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

TNG SAM reproduction of TNG properties achieved by explicit calibration to TNG data

  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Calibrated to reproduce baryon cycling in stellar feedback-dominated TNG galaxies (∼10^{10}M_⊙<M_{200}<10^{12}M_⊙), the TNG SAM introduces several key updates to the Santa Cruz framework regarding: 1) halo gas (re-)accretion efficiency, 2) a cooling model that moves beyond the traditional cold/hot mode dichotomy, 3) explicit treatment of both galactic- and halo-scale outflows, 4) star formation efficiency, and 5) the circulation of metals between galaxies and their surroundings. These changes enable the TNG SAM to reproduce TNG's flow of gas and metals ... within ≲30% accuracy out to z=6."

    The five updates are introduced and then stated to enable reproduction of the same TNG quantities to which the model was calibrated. The reported agreement is therefore enforced by the calibration step rather than emerging as a separate result.

full rationale

The paper's core claim is that the updated Santa Cruz SAM reproduces TNG baryon cycling, gas/metal flows, stellar masses, and halo gas masses to ≲30% out to z=6. This match is obtained after the model is calibrated to TNG galaxies in the stellar-feedback-dominated window 10^10 < M_200 < 10^12 M_⊙. The reproduction therefore reduces directly to the fitting procedure within the calibrated domain rather than constituting an independent derivation or prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model depends on multiple calibration parameters for the five listed updates plus standard assumptions of hierarchical merging and analytic baryon cycling; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • halo gas re-accretion efficiency
    Calibrated to match TNG baryon cycling in the target mass range
  • cooling model parameters
    Updated beyond traditional cold/hot mode split
  • galactic- and halo-scale outflow parameters
    Explicit treatment calibrated to TNG
  • star formation efficiency
    Calibrated to TNG galaxies
  • metal circulation parameters
    Calibrated to reproduce TNG metal flows
assumptions (2)
  • standard math Hierarchical merging and structure formation in ΛCDM cosmology
    Background framework for all SAMs
  • domain assumption Baryon cycling can be captured by analytic prescriptions with five targeted updates
    Core modeling choice stated in abstract

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TNG SAM: Bridging Hydrodynamical Complexity and Semi-Analytic Efficiency to Model Galaxy Formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OE5UAP7K

@misc{pith2026260618352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TNG SAM: Bridging Hydrodynamical Complexity and Semi-Analytic Efficiency to Model Galaxy Formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OE5UAP7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.18352}
}
abstract

All cosmological models of galaxy formation must navigate the trade-off between physical accuracy and computational efficiency. Hydrodynamical simulations provide spatially resolved predictions for the co-evolution of dark matter, gas, stars, and black holes, but rely on phenomenological subgrid models for small-scale processes (e.g., star formation). Semi-analytic models (SAMs), by contrast, gain efficiency through simplified, analytic treatments of the same processes, at the cost of reduced predictive scope. In this work, we leverage the strengths of the Santa Cruz SAM and the IllustrisTNG hydrodynamical simulation to develop the TNG SAM. Calibrated to reproduce baryon cycling in stellar feedback-dominated TNG galaxies ($\sim 10^{10}M_\odot < M_{200} < 10^{12}M_\odot$), the TNG SAM introduces several key updates to the Santa Cruz framework regarding: 1) halo gas (re-)accretion efficiency, 2) a cooling model that moves beyond the traditional cold/hot mode dichotomy, 3) explicit treatment of both galactic- and halo-scale outflows, 4) star formation efficiency, and 5) the circulation of metals between galaxies and their surroundings. These changes enable the TNG SAM to reproduce TNG's flow of gas and metals from the scale of the galaxy to the halo, as well as global galaxy (e.g., stellar mass) and halo (e.g. hot halo gas mass) properties within $\lesssim 30\%$ accuracy out to $z=6$. This work demonstrates that, with appropriate calibration, SAMs can capture the complex physics of galaxy formation modeled in hydrodynamical simulations while providing a flexible framework for studying galaxy evolution across the large cosmological volumes targeted by future observational surveys.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18352 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A sample Mhalo∼ 1011.3M⊙ central subhalo (ID: 609911) from TNG100 is shown to illustrate how TNG’s out￾puts are compared to the SAM. The map is color-coded by total gas mass, with brighter regions indicating higher mass concentrations. In TNG, we define the interstellar medium (ISM) as all material within twice the stellar half-mass radius (solid blue circle), and the circumgalactic medium (CGM) as all material with… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of global galaxy-scale properties (panels i.–iv.) and flow rates (panels v.–ix.) between TNG100 (dotted lines) and the Santa Cruz SAM (dashed squares). Each panel shows median trends as a function of halo mass, color-coded by a representative subset of redshifts (z = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6): darker colors correspond to lower redshift and lighter colors to higher redshift, ranging from dark purple to yellow (see co… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the TNG SAM, calibrated to reproduce the baryon cycle of central galaxies in the TNG100 simula￾tion. The diagram shows the main baryonic reservoirs—cold gas (Mcold), stars (Mstar), hot halo gas (Mhot), and ejected gas (Mejected)—and the flows of gas and…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the scaling relations measured from TNG100 and the subset of TNG100 galaxies analyzed by YO25, organized by relations regulating gas flows, star formation, and metal flows. Each panel shows the distribution of TNG100 values as a function of halo mass and ov…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Functions that govern the TNG SAM’s stellar feedback-driven outflows at the scale of the galaxy (left and middle panels) and halo (right panel) across redshift. The left panel shows that the mass loading factor ηISM (solid lines), defined as the ratio of the outflow ra…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of halo-scale quantities (panels i–ii.) and the corresponding gas and metal flow rates (panels iii–vi.) between TNG100 (dotted lines) and the newly calibrated TNG SAM (dashed triangles). The TNG SAM reproduces the hot gas mass and hot gas metallicity within …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of galaxy-scale properties (panels i–v.) and flow rates (panels vi–ix.) between TNG100 (dotted lines) and the newly calibrated TNG SAM (dashed triangles). As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: To show the importance of each modification made to the TNG SAM, we illustrate how reverting individual model components to their original SC SAM formulations impacts the TNG SAM’s ability to reproduce TNG’s global results at the galaxy and halo scales at z = 0. The so…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continuation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cooling times (tcool) for TNG (dotted lines) and the SC SAM (dashed squares). The left and middle panels show the time evolution of tcool for cold-mode (rcool > rvir) and hot-mode (rcool < rvir) halos, respectively, at z = 1, 2, 6. The solid lines represent the dynami…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Spatial distribution of matched halos between TNG100 and the TNG SAM at z = 0, plotted in physical space (x vs. y position). All TNG100 halos with 10.6 < log Mhalo < 12 are shown in white. The map is divided into seven sectors corresponding to a specific galaxy proper…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of Mhot, Mcold, Mstarand SFR between the fiducial TNG100 model implemented in a 36.9 3 comoving Mpc3 volume (black dotted lines) and an otherwise identical variant that excludes black holes (green dashed crosses). At lower halo masses (log Mhalo< 11.2), the…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the Santa Cruz SAM used in this work (dashed squares) to the Santa Cruz SAM presented in Gabrielpillai et al. 2022 (dashed circles) for Mhot. The original SC SAM’s cooling model depleted the CGM by up to ∼ 120% relative to the updated model presented her…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Extension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Extension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Galaxy-scale properties and baryon flow rates for the TNG SAM calibrated using only ∼ 100 randomly selected galaxies per redshift. The figure follows the same layout, quantities, and redshift color-coding as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Halo-scale quantities and baryon flow rates for the TNG SAM calibrated using only ∼ 100 randomly selected galaxies per redshift, shown using the same layout and redshift color scheme as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Assessing the statistical significance of periodogram peaks

    A semi-analytic model for the co-evolution of galaxies, black holes and active galactic nuclei , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2008 , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13805.x 2008

  2. [2]

    First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3304 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3304 2018

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    E pur si muove:. MNRAS , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x 2010

  4. [4]

    THE STAR FORMATION LAW IN NEARBY GALAXIES ON SUB-KPC SCALES

    Bigiel, F. and Leroy, A. and Walter, F. and Brinks, E. and de Blok, W. J. G. and Madore, B. and Thornley, M. D. , month =. The. 2008 , comment =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2846 2008

  5. [5]

    Benson, A. J. and Bower, R. G. and Frenk, C. S. and Lacey, C. G. and Baugh, C. M. and Cole, S. , month =. What. 2003 , comment =. doi:10.1086/379160 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/379160 2003

  6. [6]

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. , month =. The. 1998 , comment =. doi:10.1086/305588 , journal=

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/305588 1998

  7. [7]

    Sutherland, R. S. and Dopita, M. A. , month =. Cooling functions for low-density astrophysical plasmas , volume =. 1993 , keywords =. doi:10.1086/191823 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1086/191823 1993

  8. [8]

    Bower, R. G. and Benson, A. J. and Malbon, R. and Helly, J. C. and Frenk, C. S. and Baugh, C. M. and Cole, S. and Lacey, C. G. , month =. Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formation , volume =. 2006 , comment =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10519.x , journal=

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10519.x 2006

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    Croton, D. J. and Springel, V. and White, S. D. M. and De Lucia, G. and Frenk, C. S. and Gao, L. and Jenkins, A. and Kauffmann, G. and Navarro, J. F. and Yoshida, N. , month =. The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cooling flows, black holes and the luminosities and colour...

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    MNRAS , author =

    Characterizing mass, momentum, energy, and metal outflow rates of multiphase galactic winds in the. MNRAS , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2714 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    and Angles-Alcazar, Daniel and Hayward, Christopher C

    Pandya, Viraj and Somerville, Rachel S. and Angles-Alcazar, Daniel and Hayward, Christopher C. and Bryan, Greg L. and Fielding, Drummond B. and Forbes, John C. and Burkhart, Blakesley and Genel, Shy and Hernquist, Lars and Kim, Chang-Goo and Tonnesen, Stephanie and Starkenburg...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    MNRAS , author =

    The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation and its scatter in. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , file =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz243 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    MNRAS , author =

    Atomic and molecular gas in. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , comment =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1323 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    MNRAS , author =

    Simulating. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , comment =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    ARA&A , author =

    Physical. ARA&A , author =. 2015 , comment =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    MNRAS , author =

    Constraining the galaxy-halo connection over the last 13.3. MNRAS , author =. 2017 , comment =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1172 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    and Tollerud, Erik J

    Robitaille, Thomas P. and Tollerud, Erik J. and Greenfield, Perry and Droettboom, Michael and Bray, Erik and Aldcroft, Tom and Davis, Matt and Ginsburg, Adam and Price-Whelan, Adrian M. and Kerzendorf, Wolfgang E. and Conley, Alexander and Crighton, Neil and Barbary, Kyle and ...

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galactic outflow rates in the. MNRAS , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa938 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    MNRAS , author =

    The impact of stellar and. MNRAS , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2359 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxy formation in the. MNRAS , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv705 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and van der Walt, Stefan J

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and van der Walt, Stefan J. and Brett, Matthew and Wilson, Joshua and Millma...

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Computing in Science & Engineering , author =

    The. Computing in Science & Engineering , author =. 2011 , comment =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Caswell, Thomas A. and Lee, Antony and Droettboom, Michael and Andrade, Elliott Sales de and Hoffmann, Tim and Klymak, Jody and Hunter, John and Firing, Eric and Stansby, David and Varoquaux, Nelle and Nielsen, Jens Hedegaard and Root, Benjamin and May, Ryan and Elson, Phil an...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    , month =

    Perez, Fernando and Granger, Brian E. , month =. Computing in Science & Engineering , publisher =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 , abstract =

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    MNRAS , author =

    Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2944 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2338 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    2016 , pages =

    A&A , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 , language =

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3040 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2306 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Anderson, L. D. and Bania, T. M. and Balser, Dana S. and Cunningham, V. and Wenger, T. V. and Johnstone, B. M. and Armentrout, W. P. , month =. ApJS , publisher =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    MNRAS , author =

    Semi-analytic modelling of galaxy formation: the local. MNRAS , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03032.x , abstract =

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    Sanchez, S. F. and Kennicutt, R. C. and Paz, A. Gil de and Ven, G. van de and Vilchez, J. M. and Wisotzki, L. and Walcher, C. J. and Mast, D. and Aguerri, J. a. L. and Albiol-Perez, S. and Alonso-Herrero, A. and Alves, J. and Bakos, J. and Bartakova, T. and Bland-Hawthorn, J. ...

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxy formation in the. MNRAS , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2297 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    MNRAS , author =

    The relationship between black hole mass and galaxy properties: examining the black hole feedback model in. MNRAS , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa374 , abstract =

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    MNRAS , author =

    Star formation in semi-analytic galaxy formation models with multiphase gas , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1877 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    MNRAS , author =

    A comparison of semi-analytic and smoothed particle hydrodynamics galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03966.x , abstract =

    2001 doi

  30. [38]

    MNRAS , author =

    A comparison of gas dynamics in smooth particle hydrodynamics and semi-analytic models of galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06152.x , abstract =

    2003 doi

  31. [39]

    MNRAS , author =

    Analytic and numerical realizations of a disc galaxy , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16944.x , abstract =

    2010 doi

  32. [40]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxy formation in semi-analytic models and cosmological hydrodynamic zoom simulations , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19961.x , abstract =

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxies in the. MNRAS , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1525 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    MNRAS , author =

    A model for cosmological simulations of galaxy formation physics , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1789 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    MNRAS , author =

    Gas cooling in simulations of the formation of the galaxy population , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05661.x , abstract =

    2002 doi

  36. [44]

    MNRAS , author =

    Magnetohydrodynamics on an unstructured moving grid , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x , abstract =

    2011 doi

  37. [45]

    MNRAS , author =

    Simulations of magnetic fields in isolated disc galaxies , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt428 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    2018 , pages =

    MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1690 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    MNRAS , author =

    A model for cosmological simulations of galaxy formation physics: multi-epoch validation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2295 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxy properties from the ultraviolet to the far-infrared: L cold dark matter models confront observations , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20490.x , abstract =

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    MNRAS , author =

    Understanding the structural scaling relations of early-type galaxies , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1434 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    MNRAS , author =

    Semi-analytic forecasts for. MNRAS , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3595 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    MNRAS , author =

    Evolution of the atomic and molecular gas content of galaxies , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu991 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    Collaboration, The Astropy and Price-Whelan, A. M. and Sipocz, B. M. and Gunther, H. M. and Lim, P. L. and Crawford, S. M. and Conseil, S. and Shupe, D. L. and Craig, M. W. and Dencheva, N. and Ginsburg, A. and VanderPlas, J. T. and Bradley, L. D. and Perez-Suarez, D. and Val-...

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    and Lim, Pey Lian and Earl, Nicholas and Starkman, Nathaniel and Bradley, Larry and Shupe, David L

    Collaboration, The Astropy and Price-Whelan, Adrian M. and Lim, Pey Lian and Earl, Nicholas and Starkman, Nathaniel and Bradley, Larry and Shupe, David L. and Patil, Aarya A. and Corrales, Lia and Brasseur, C. E. and Nothe, Maximilian and Donath, Axel and Tollerud, Erik and Mo...

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    and Wechsler, Risa H

    Behroozi, Peter S. and Wechsler, Risa H. and Wu, Hao-Yi , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109 , abstract =

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    ApJ , author =

    The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter , volume =. ApJ , author =. 1985 , pages =. doi:10.1086/163168 , abstract =

    1985 doi

  48. [56]

    MNRAS , author =

    Mass loss of galaxies due to an ultraviolet background , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13830.x , abstract =

    2008 doi

  49. [57]

    and Barden, Marco and Rix, Hans-Walter and Bell, Eric F

    Somerville, Rachel S. and Barden, Marco and Rix, Hans-Walter and Bell, Eric F. and Beckwith, Steven V. W. and Borch, Andrea and Caldwell, John A. R. and Haussler, Boris and Heymans, Catherine and Jahnke, Knud and Jogee, Shardha and McIntosh, Daniel H. and Meisenheimer, Klaus a...

    2008 doi

  50. [58]

    MNRAS , author =

    A general model for the. MNRAS , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20536.x , abstract =

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    and Kravtsov, Andrey V

    Gnedin, Nickolay Y. and Kravtsov, Andrey V. , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/88 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    ApJ , author =

    Galaxy formation through hierarchical clustering , volume =. ApJ , author =. 1991 , pages =. doi:10.1086/170483 , abstract =

    1991 doi

  53. [61]

    ApJ , author =

    The. ApJ , author =. 1996 , comment =. doi:10.1086/177173 , abstract =

    1996 doi

  54. [62]

    and Bryan, Greg L

    Pandya, Viraj and Fielding, Drummond B. and Bryan, Greg L. and Carr, Christopher and Somerville, Rachel S. and Stern, Jonathan and Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre and Hafen, Zachary and Angles-Alcazar, Daniel and Forbes, John C. , month =. A. ApJ , publisher =. 2023 , pages =. d...

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    MNRAS , author =

    Comparing galaxy formation in semi-analytic models and hydrodynamical simulations , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2770 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    MNRAS , author =

    Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x , abstract =

    2003 doi

  57. [65]

    MNRAS , author =

    The star formation activity of. MNRAS , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz712 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    and O'Shea, Brian W

    Cote, Benoit and Silvia, Devin W. and O'Shea, Brian W. and Smith, Britton and Wise, John H. , month =. Validating. ApJ , publisher =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe8f , abstract =

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    MNRAS , author =

    Hydrodynamical simulations and semi-analytic models of galaxy formation: two sides of the same coin , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20584.x , abstract =

    2012 doi

  60. [68]

    MNRAS , author =

    Gas cooling in semi-analytic models and smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: are results consistent? , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16737.x , abstract =

    2010 doi

  61. [69]

    MNRAS , author =

    A semi-analytic model comparison: testing cooling models against hydrodynamical simulations , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu655 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    and Turk, Matthew J

    Wise, John H. and Turk, Matthew J. and Norman, Michael L. and Abel, Tom , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/50 , abstract =

    2011 doi

  63. [71]

    MNRAS , author =

    The size evolution of star-forming and quenched galaxies in the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3078 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    Pandya, Viraj , year =. Semi-

  65. [73]

    MNRAS , author =

    From dwarf spheroidals to. MNRAS , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18114.x , abstract =

    2011 doi

  66. [74]

    MNRAS , author =

    Constraints on star formation driven galaxy winds from the mass-metallicity relation at z= 0 , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19456.x , abstract =

    2011 doi

  67. [75]

    Diemer, Benedikt and Stevens, Adam R. H. and Forbes, John C. and Marinacci, Federico and Hernquist, Lars and Lagos, Claudia del P. and Sternberg, Amiel and Pillepich, Annalisa and Nelson, Dylan and Popping, Gergo and Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco and Torrey, Paul and Vogelsbe...

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    and Fielding, Drummond B

    Carr, Christopher and Bryan, Greg L. and Fielding, Drummond B. and Pandya, Viraj and Somerville, Rachel S. , month =. Regulation of. ApJ , publisher =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c7 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    MNRAS , author =

    How gas flows shape the stellar-halo mass relation in the eagle simulation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3339 , abstract =

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    MNRAS , author =

    The degeneracy of galaxy formation models , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16656.x , abstract =

    2010 doi

  71. [79]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2206 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  72. [80]

    MNRAS , author =

    The massive end of the luminosity and stellar mass functions: dependence on the fit to the light profile , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1607 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    MNRAS , author =

    The ages and metallicities of galaxies in the local universe , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x , abstract =

    2005 doi

  74. [82]

    and Werk, Jessica K

    Peeples, Molly S. and Werk, Jessica K. and Tumlinson, Jason and Oppenheimer, Benjamin D. and Prochaska, J. Xavier and Katz, Neal and Weinberg, David H. , month =. A. ApJ , publisher =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/54 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  75. [83]

    and Ma, Chung-Pei , month =

    McConnell, Nicholas J. and Ma, Chung-Pei , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/184 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  76. [84]

    Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica , author =

    The. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica , author =. 2018 , comment =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1803.07692 , abstract =

    2018 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    and Young, J

    Keres, Dusan and Yun, Min S. and Young, J. S. , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1086/344820 , abstract =

    2003 doi

  78. [86]

    and Croton, D

    Obreschkow, D. and Croton, D. and Lucia, G. De and Khochfar, S. and Rawlings, S. , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1467 , abstract =

    2009 doi

  79. [87]

    Jabran and Geller, Margaret J

    Zahid, H. Jabran and Geller, Margaret J. and Kewley, Lisa J. and Hwang, Ho Seong and Fabricant, Daniel G. and Kurtz, Michael J. , month =. ApJL , publisher =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L19 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  80. [88]

    and Cortese, L

    Boselli, A. and Cortese, L. and Boquien, M. and Boissier, S. and Catinella, B. and Lagos, C. and Saintonge, A. , month =. Cold gas properties of the. A&A , publisher =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322312 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  81. [89]

    MNRAS , author =

    Populating a cluster of galaxies -. MNRAS , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04912.x , abstract =

    2001 doi

  82. [90]

    MNRAS , author =

    The merger rate of galaxies in the. MNRAS , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv264 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  83. [91]

    MNRAS , author =

    A unified multiwavelength model of galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1888 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    MNRAS , author =

    Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 1978 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 , abstract =

    1978 doi

  85. [93]

    MNRAS , author =

    First results from the. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty618 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  86. [94]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , author =

    Dark. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.14 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  87. [95]

    and Stevens, Adam R

    Croton, Darren J. and Stevens, Adam R. H. and Tonini, Chiara and Garel, Thibault and Bernyk, Maksym and Bibiano, Antonio and Hodkinson, Luke and Mutch, Simon J. and Poole, Gregory B. and Shattow, Genevieve M. , month =. ApJS , publisher =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049...

    2016 doi

  88. [96]

    New Astronomy , author =

    Galacticus:. New Astronomy , author =. 2012 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2011.07.004 , abstract =

    2012 doi

  89. [97]

    and Tobar, Rodrigo J

    Lagos, Claudia del P. and Tobar, Rodrigo J. and Robotham, Aaron S. G. and Obreschkow, Danail and Mitchell, Peter D. and Power, Chris and Elahi, Pascal J. , month =. Shark: introducing an open source, free, and flexible semi-analytic model of galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS ...

    2018 doi

  90. [98]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galaxy assembly, stellar feedback and metal enrichment: the view from the gaea model , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1318 , abstract =

    2016 doi

  91. [99]

    MNRAS , author =

    The morgana model for the rise of galaxies and active nuclei , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11253.x , abstract =

    2007 doi

  92. [100]

    MNRAS , author =

    On the algorithms of radiative cooling in semi-analytic models , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19072.x , abstract =

    2011 doi

  93. [101]

    and Lacey, Cedric G

    Lagos, Claudia del P. and Lacey, Cedric G. and Baugh, Carlton M. , month =. A dynamical model of supernova feedback: gas outflows from the interstellar medium , volume =. MNRAS , publisher =. 2013 , comment =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1696 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  94. [102]

    MNRAS , author =

    Semi-analytic galaxies -. MNRAS , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2347 , abstract =

    2018 doi

  95. [103]

    MNRAS , author =

    Simulations of the galaxy population constrained by observations from z = 3 to the present day: implications for galactic winds and the fate of their ejecta , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt415 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  96. [104]

    MNRAS , author =

    Resolving cosmic structure formation with the. MNRAS , author =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x , abstract =

    2009 doi

  97. [105]

    Mark and Carr, Christopher and Fielding, Drummond B

    Voit, G. Mark and Carr, Christopher and Fielding, Drummond B. and Pandya, Viraj and Bryan, Greg L. and Donahue, Megan and Oppenheimer, Benjamin D. and Somerville, Rachel S. , month =. Equilibrium. ApJ , publisher =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad81d5 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  98. [106]

    MNRAS , author =

    The baryon cycle in modern cosmological hydrodynamical simulations , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1688 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  99. [107]

    Mark and Pandya, Viraj and Fielding, Drummond B

    Voit, G. Mark and Pandya, Viraj and Fielding, Drummond B. and Bryan, Greg L. and Carr, Christopher and Donahue, Megan and Oppenheimer, Benjamin D. and Somerville, Rachel S. , month =. Equilibrium. ApJ , publisher =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad81d6 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    MNRAS , author =

    Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 1993 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 , abstract =

    1993 doi

  101. [109]

    Bond, J. R. and Cole, S. and Efstathiou, G. and Kaiser, N. , month =. Excursion. APJ , publisher =. 1991 , comment =. doi:10.1086/170520 , abstract =

    1991 doi

  102. [110]

    MNRAS , author =

    The evolution of groups of galaxies in the. MNRAS , author =. 1991 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/248.2.332 , abstract =

    1991 doi

  103. [111]

    and Norman, Michael L

    Bryan, Greg L. and Norman, Michael L. , month =. Statistical. ApJ , publisher =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1086/305262 , abstract =

    1998 doi

  104. [112]

    MNRAS , author =

    Galactic chemical evolution in hierarchical formation models -. MNRAS , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15924.x , abstract =

    2010 doi

  105. [113]

    MNRAS , author =

    Simulations of. MNRAS , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11555.x , abstract =

    2007 doi

  106. [114]

    MNRAS , author =

    The relation between metallicity, stellar mass and star formation in galaxies: an analysis of observational and model data , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20595.x , abstract =

    2012 doi

  107. [115]

    MNRAS , author =

    Hierarchical galaxy formation , volume =. MNRAS , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x , abstract =

    2000 doi

  108. [116]

    and Genel, Shy and Omoruyi, Osase and Sternberg, Amiel , month =

    Oren, Yossi and Pandya, Viraj and Somerville, Rachel S. and Genel, Shy and Omoruyi, Osase and Sternberg, Amiel , month =. The. 2025 , comment =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.23343 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  109. [117]

    and Whitmore, Bradley C

    Lee, Janice C. and Whitmore, Bradley C. and Thilker, David A. and Deger, Sinan and Larson, Kirsten L. and Ubeda, Leonardo and Anand, Gagandeep S. and Boquien, Mederic and Chandar, Rupali and Dale, Daniel A. and Emsellem, Eric and Leroy, Adam K. and Rosolowsky, Erik and Schinne...

    2022 doi

  110. [118]

    Mark , month =

    Voit, G. Mark , month =. Bound. PASP , publisher =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/adb0ef , abstract =

    2025 doi

  111. [119]

    and Voort, Freeke van de , month =

    Crain, Robert A. and Voort, Freeke van de , month =. Hydrodynamical. ARA&A , publisher =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-041923-043618 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  112. [120]

    , month =

    Naab, Thorsten and Ostriker, Jeremiah P. , month =. Theoretical. ARA&A , publisher =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  113. [121]

    Cosmological

    Feldmann, Robert and Bieri, Rebekka , month =. Cosmological. 2025 , comment =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.08925 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  114. [122]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    How to plant a merger tree , volume =. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02154.x , abstract =

    1999 doi

  115. [123]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    The formation and evolution of galaxies within merging dark matter haloes , volume =. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 1993 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/264.1.201 , abstract =

    1993 doi

  116. [124]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    A recipe for galaxy formation , volume =. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 1994 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/271.4.781 , abstract =

    1994 doi

  117. [125]

    Granato, G. L. and Lacey, C. G. and Silva, L. and Bressan, A. and Baugh, C. M. and Cole, S. and Frenk, C. S. , month =. The. ApJ , publisher =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1086/317032 , abstract =

    doi

  118. [126]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    How sensitive are predicted galaxy luminosities to the choice of stellar population synthesis model? , volume =. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2410 , abstract =

    2014 doi

  119. [127]

    Genel, Shy and Bryan, Greg L. and Springel, Volker and Hernquist, Lars and Nelson, Dylan and Pillepich, Annalisa and Weinberger, Rainer and Pakmor, Rudiger and Marinacci, Federico and Vogelsberger, Mark , month =. A. ApJ , publisher =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf...

    2019 doi

  120. [128]

    and Hernquist, Lars and Franx, Marijn and Hopkins, Philip F

    Robertson, Brant and Cox, Thomas J. and Hernquist, Lars and Franx, Marijn and Hopkins, Philip F. and Martini, Paul and Springel, Volker , month =. The. ApJ , publisher =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1086/500360 , abstract =

    2006 doi

  121. [129]

    and Cox, Thomas J

    Hopkins, Philip F. and Cox, Thomas J. and Younger, Joshua D. and Hernquist, Lars , month =. ApJ , publisher =. 2009 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1168 , abstract =

    2009 doi

  122. [130]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    The. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3620 , abstract =

    2023 doi

  123. [131]

    and Tyson, J

    Ivezic, Zeljko and Kahn, Steven M. and Tyson, J. Anthony and Abel, Bob and Acosta, Emily and Allsman, Robyn and Alonso, David and AlSayyad, Yusra and Anderson, Scott F. and Andrew, John and P. Angel, James Roger and Angeli, George Z. and Ansari, Reza and Antilogus, Pierre and ...

    2019 doi

  124. [132]

    Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =

    L-. Mon Not R Astron Soc , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3233 , abstract =

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.