Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 63 references

Elastic positivity carves a spectrahedral region in the twelve Wilson coefficients of the photon–dark-photon EFT and forces hierarchies among mixed-helicity amplitudes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 23:56 UTC pith:QXHSJSXN

load-bearing objection First complete positivity geometry for the photon–massless-dark-photon EFT: 19 amplitudes, 12 Wilson coefficients, analytic spectrahedral bounds that place standard UV portals cleanly.

arxiv 2607.06658 v1 pith:QXHSJSXN submitted 2026-07-07 hep-ph hep-exhep-th

The Positivity Geometry of Photon--Dark-Photon Effective Field Theories

Sayantan Chakraborty , Yash Dadhwal , Arun M. Thalapillil This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-th
keywords positivity boundsdark photoneffective field theoryWilson coefficientsspectrahedronhelicity amplitudeskinetic mixingdark axion portal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the allowed low-energy theory of ordinary photons mixed with a massless dark photon. Below the electron mass the leading interactions are twelve dimension-eight operators. Analyticity and unitarity, encoded in a modified forward dispersion relation, force linear and nonlinear inequalities on those twelve Wilson coefficients. The inequalities define a spectrahedral geometry whose faces and vertices are populated by concrete ultraviolet models such as kinetic mixing and dark-axion portals. The same bounds imply amplitude hierarchies and two-sided constraints that remain valid even away from the forward limit. The result therefore converts abstract consistency requirements into a concrete geometric diagnostic that can discriminate among dark-sector completions.

Core claim

Elastic positivity applied to a modified, s–u-odd forward dispersion relation yields an independent set of linear and nonlinear inequalities on the twelve CP-even Wilson coefficients of the photon–massless-dark-photon EFT. These inequalities define a spectrahedral geometry (including an elliptope slice GS ≽ 0 and a spectrahedral shadow of a lifted quartic matrix polynomial) that is the strongest model-independent constraint presently available on this theory.

What carries the argument

The modified forward function M(s) = [M(s)+M(–s)]/s^{3} whose contour integral around the infrared origin is non-negative by the optical theorem and Regge boundedness; the resulting elastic positivity condition on factorized two-particle states produces the spectrahedral bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that massless spin-1 amplitudes are Regge-bounded and that graviton exchange can be completely decoupled or left only as a parametrically tiny residual, so the contour integral closes without gravitational poles.

What would settle it

An explicit ultraviolet completion whose one-loop or tree-level matching produces Wilson coefficients lying strictly outside the claimed spectrahedron (for example, violating GS ≽ 0 or any of the independent inequalities (11)–(19)) would falsify the positivity geometry.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the complete CP-even dimension-8 EFT of a photon and a massless dark photon (12 Wilson coefficients, 19 independent helicity amplitudes) and derives elastic positivity bounds from a modified forward-limit dispersion relation that enforces s–u symmetry. Analytic linear, quadratic and nonlinear inequalities (Eqs. 11–19) are obtained in tractable C2⊗C4 subspaces; they define a spectrahedral geometry (Gram matrix GS ⪰ 0 and a spectrahedral shadow of a quartic matrix polynomial). These bounds imply non-forward amplitude hierarchies and two-sided constraints, and the loci of kinetic-mixing and dark-axion-portal UV completions inside the geometry are mapped explicitly.

Significance. The work supplies the first complete positivity analysis of the mixed photon–dark-photon EFT, a setting of direct experimental and astrophysical interest. The analytic spectrahedral constraints, the non-forward amplitude consequences, and the concrete UV-completion diagnostics constitute a genuine extension of the pure-photon literature and of the broader EFT-hedron programme. The End-Matter proofs of the optical-theorem identity and the spectrahedral lift, together with the explicit one-loop/tree-level UV calculations, make the results reproducible and immediately usable for model building.

minor comments (4)
  1. The phrase “currently provide the strongest model-independent theoretical constraints” (Introduction) is comparative; a short clause noting that the comparison is with existing pure-photon or restricted multi-U(1) bounds would make the claim self-contained.
  2. Figure 1 caption: the four vertices are listed, but the two shaded branches of the determinant-zero surface are not labelled; a brief parenthetical would aid readability.
  3. End Matter, kinetic-mixing conventions: the angle ϕ = sin^{-1} ε appears without an explicit range; stating 0 ≤ ϕ < π/2 would remove any ambiguity when comparing to the θ = 0 and θ = sin^{-1} ε loci discussed in the main text.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “s−ucrossing” missing spaces, “Delbrück-like” hyphenation). A final proof-reading pass would eliminate them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: elastic positivity bounds and spectrahedral geometry follow from standard S-matrix axioms applied to a newly enumerated EFT, with independent UV checks.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from the complete enumeration of 19 independent helicity amplitudes (via parity, time-reversal and crossing) and the 12 CP-even dimension-8 operators of the photon–massless-dark-photon EFT. A modified forward dispersion relation M(s) = [M(s)+M(-s)]/s^{3} is constructed; contour integration, the optical theorem, s–u crossing and the standard assumptions of Regge boundedness plus gravity decoupling then yield the elastic positivity integral (10). Specializing to analytically tractable C^{2}⊗C^{4} subspaces produces the independent linear/quadratic/nonlinear inequalities (11)–(19), the Gram-matrix spectrahedron GS ⪰ 0 and the spectrahedral-shadow interpretation of the quartic constraints via the S-procedure. These steps are self-contained algebraic consequences of the positivity integral; they do not redefine the Wilson coefficients in terms of the bounds, do not fit parameters to data, and do not rest on load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems of the present authors. The subsequent non-forward amplitude hierarchies (25) and two-sided bounds (26) are direct corollaries. Explicit one-loop (kinetic-mixing) and tree-level (dark-axion) UV completions merely evaluate the same Wilson coefficients and locate the resulting points inside the already-derived cone; they supply independent consistency checks rather than inputs. No step reduces by construction to its own premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard S-matrix axioms plus a small number of domain assumptions customary in the positivity literature; no free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The only non-standard technical choice is the particular odd function M(s) and the elastic (rather than full dual-cone) restriction.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption S-matrix analyticity in the complex s-plane with a branch cut along the real axis for massless particles
    Used to justify the contour integral of the odd function M(s) around the infrared arc C0 (after Eq. 7).
  • domain assumption Optical theorem / unitarity implying Im M ≥ 0 for physical forward amplitudes
    Combined with s–u crossing to obtain Im MA→A(−s−iϵ) ≥ 0 (Eq. 8 and End Matter).
  • domain assumption Regge boundedness of massless spin-1 amplitudes allowing the large-arc contribution to vanish
    Invoked immediately after Eq. 8 to drop the UV arc and obtain the positivity integral (9).
  • domain assumption Strict decoupling of gravity (M_Pl/Λ_EFT → ∞) or only parametrically suppressed residual graviton exchange
    Stated explicitly to neglect graviton-exchange poles that would otherwise obstruct the contour.
  • domain assumption CP-even, P-symmetric theory with canonically normalised kinetic terms (kinetic mixing already diagonalised)
    Fixes the 12-operator basis (5) and the helicity-amplitude counting.
  • ad hoc to paper Elastic positivity on factorised two-particle states (Segre variety) is sufficient to extract the reported bounds
    The authors note that the full dual convex cone encodes more information but restrict to elastic slices for analytic tractability.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 18108 in / 2852 out tokens · 37831 ms · 2026-07-10T23:56:56.099816+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We derive positivity bounds on the complete dimension-eight effective field theory of photons and a massless dark photon. The mixed gauge sector contains twelve CP-even Wilson coefficients and an enlarged helicity-amplitude structure. Using a modified forward-limit dispersion relation, we analytically obtain non-trivial linear and non-linear elastic positivity constraints that define a spectrahedral geometry. We analyze implications of these bounds on non-forward amplitudes and discuss where kinetic-mixing and dark-axion-portal UV completions populate this geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06658 by Arun M. Thalapillil, Sayantan Chakraborty, Yash Dadhwal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectrahedron defining an allowed three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Using a modified forward-limit dispersion relation, we derive elastic positivity bounds that currently provide the strongest model-independent theoretical constraints on this EFT. In analytically tractable subspaces, we ob- tain explicit linear, quadratic, and nonlinear inequali- ties, several of which admit geometric interpretations as spectrahedral slic...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    millicharged

    Along with Eq.(14), these translate to a hierarchy of low-energy amplitudes in the physical region ⏐⏐M++ +′+′(s,t) ⏐⏐2 ≲M++ ++(s,t) M+′+′ +′+′(s,t), ⏐⏐⏐M++′ ++ (s,t) ⏐⏐⏐ 2 ≲M++ ++(s,t) M++′ ++′(s,t), ⏐⏐⏐M+′+ +′+′(s,t) ⏐⏐⏐ 2 ≲M+′+′ +′+′(s,t)M++′ ++′(s,t). (25) Note that this hierarchy is valid even in the non-forward limit (t̸= 0). Here, and in below, we d...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Amplitudes 2026

    These saturate the bounds in Eqs.(12)-(19). It is found that the UV completion lies on the vertices of Fig.1, specifically as (sgn(gg′),sgn(ggε),sgn(g′gε))∈Vi. Finally, if the kinetic mixing portal and dark axion portal concurrently exist in the UV, it is seen that such a hybrid UV completion would then exist inside the elliptope in the IR. This is also g...

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Dark Sectors and New, Light, Weakly-Coupled Particles

    R. Essiget al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, inSnowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi(2013) arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    The Search for Feebly-Interacting Particles

    G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov, and P. Schuster, The Search for Feebly Interacting Particles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 279 (2021), arXiv:2011.02157 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi,The Physics of the Dark Photon: A Primer(Springer Inter- national Publishing, 2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    The Dark Photon: a 2026 Perspective

    A. Caputo and R. Essig, The dark photon: a 2026 per- spective (2026), arXiv:2603.08430 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 405 (2010), arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    S. Gori, M. Williams, P. Ilten, N. Tran, G. Krnjaic, N. Toro, B. Batell, N. Blinov, C. Hearty, R. McGehee, P. Harris, P. Schuster, and J. Zupan, Dark sector physics at high-intensity experiments (2022), arXiv:2209.04671 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Consequences of Dirac Theory of the Positron

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac The- ory of the Positron, arXiv e-prints , physics/0605038 (2006), arXiv:physics/0605038 [physics.hist-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Karplus and M

    R. Karplus and M. Neuman, The Scattering of Light by Light, Phys. Rev.83, 776 (1951)

    work page 1951

  12. [12]

    A. I. Milstein and M. Schumacher, Present status of Del- bruck scattering, Phys. Rept.243, 183 (1994)

    work page 1994

  13. [13]

    Magnetic and electric properties of quantum vacuum

    R. Battesti and C. Rizzo, Magnetic and Electric Proper- ties of Quantum Vacuum, Rep. Prog. Phys.76, 016401 (2013), arXiv:1211.1933 [physics.optics]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Marklund and P

    M. Marklund and P. K. Shukla, Nonlinear Collective Effects in Photon–Photon and Photon–Plasma Inter- actions, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 591 (2006), arXiv:hep- ph/0602123

    work page arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Light shining through walls

    J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Light Shining Through Walls, Contemp. Phys.52, 211 (2011), arXiv:1011.3741 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  16. [16]

    Vacuum birefringence at x-ray free-electron lasers

    F. Karbstein, C. Sundqvist, K. S. Schulze, I. Uschmann, H. Gies, and G. G. Paulus, Vacuum Birefringence at X-Ray Free-Electron Lasers, New J. Phys.23, 095001 (2021), arXiv:2105.13869 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    A. K. Harding and D. Lai, Physics of Strongly Magne- tized Neutron Stars, Rep. Prog. Phys.69, 2631 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0606674

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  18. [18]

    CMB $V$ modes from photon-photon forward scattering revisited

    A. Hoseinpour, M. Zarei, G. Orlando, N. Bartolo, and 6 S. Matarrese,CMB Vmodes from photon-photon for- ward scattering revisited, Phys. Rev. D102, 063501 (2020), arXiv:2006.14418 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Adams, N

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an ir obstruc- tion to uv completion, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006, 014 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, The eft-hedron, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 10.1007/jhep05(2021)259 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)259 2021

  22. [22]

    Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics

    C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley, and S.- Y. Zhou, Snowmass white paper: Uv constraints on ir physics (2022), arXiv:2203.06805 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Henriksson, B

    J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, Rigor- ous bounds on light-by-light scattering, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 10.1007/jhep06(2022)158 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2022)158 2022

  24. [24]

    S. D. Chowdhury, K. Ghosh, P. Haldar, P. Raman, and A. Sinha, Crossing Symmetric Spinning S-matrix Bootstrap: EFT bounds, SciPost Phys.13, 051 (2022), arXiv:2112.11755 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Häring, A

    K. Häring, A. Hebbar, D. Karateev, M. Meineri, and J. Penedones, Bounds on photon scattering, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 10.1007/jhep10(2024)103 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)103 2024

  26. [26]

    T.Noumi, S.Sato,andJ.Tokuda,Phenomenologicalmo- tivation for gravitational positivity bounds: A case study of dark sector physics, Phys. Rev. D108, 056013 (2023), arXiv:2205.12835 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    K. Aoki, T. Noumi, R. Saito, S. Sato, S. Shirai, J. Tokuda, and M. Yamazaki, Gravitational positivity for phenomenologists: Dark gauge boson in the swamp- land, Phys. Rev. D110, 016002 (2024), arXiv:2305.10058 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Constraining Millicharged dark matter with Gravitational positivity bounds

    S. Kim and P. Ko, Constraining millicharged dark matter with gravitational positivity bounds (2025), arXiv:2405.04454 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency

    S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency, Fortsch. Phys.66, 1800020 (2018), arXiv:1802.04287 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Uv complete me: positivity bounds for parti- cles with spin, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 10.1007/jhep03(2018)011 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)011 2018

  31. [31]

    Spinning S-matrix Bootstrap in 4d

    A. Hebbar, D. Karateev, and J. Penedones, Spinning S- matrix Bootstrap in 4d (2022), arXiv:2011.11708 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Positive Moments for Scattering Amplitudes

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104, 036006 (2021), arXiv:2011.00037 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Positivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole

    L. Alberte, C. de Rham, S. Jaitly, and A. J. Tolley, Pos- itivity Bounds and the Massless Spin-2 Pole, Phys. Rev. D102, 125023 (2020), arXiv:2007.12667 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Tokuda, K

    J. Tokuda, K. Aoki, and S. Hirano, Gravitational pos- itivity bounds, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 10.1007/jhep11(2020)054 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)054 2020

  35. [35]

    S. D. Chowdhury, A. Gadde, T. Gopalka, I. Halder, L. Janagal, and S. Minwalla, Classifying and constrain- ing local four photon and four graviton s-matrices (2019), arXiv:1910.14392 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Bounds on Regge growth of flat space scattering from bounds on chaos

    D. Chandorkar, S. D. Chowdhury, S. Kundu, and S. Min- walla, Bounds on regge growth of flat space scattering from bounds on chaos (2021), arXiv:2102.03122 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Convex Geometry Perspective to the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201601 (2020), arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    X. Li, H. Xu, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Pos- itivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 121601 (2021), arXiv:2101.01191 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Vandenberghe and S

    L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd, Semidefinite program- ming, SIAM Review38, 49 (1996)

    work page 1996

  40. [40]

    The Algebraic Boundary of Graph Elliptopes

    M. Laurent, F. M. Mascarin, and S. Telen, The algebraic boundary of graph elliptopes (2026), arXiv:2605.02484 [math.AG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Pólik and T

    I. Pólik and T. Terlaky, A survey of the s-lemma, SIAM Review49, 371 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Gouveia, P

    J. Gouveia, P. A. Parrilo, and R. R. Thomas, Lifts of convex sets and cone factorizations, Mathematics of Op- erations Research38, 248 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Scheiderer, Spectrahedral shadows, SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry2, 26 (2018)

    C. Scheiderer, Spectrahedral shadows, SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry2, 26 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    D. P. Aguillardet al.(Muon g-2), Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 101802 (2025), arXiv:2506.03069 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Aliberti, T

    R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani, A. Bashir, G. Ben- ton, J. Bijnens, V. Biloshytskyi, T. Blum, D. Boito, M. Bruno,et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: an update, Physics Re- ports1143, 1 (2025), the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: An update

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Aldins, S

    J. Aldins, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Dufner, and T. Kinoshita, Photon-Photon Scattering Contribution to the Sixth- Order Magnetic Moments of the Muon and Electron, Phys. Rev. D1, 2378 (1970)

    work page 1970

  47. [47]

    Improved $\alpha^4$ Term of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment

    T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Improvedα4 Term of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. D70, 113001 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0402206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Light-by-Light-Type Cor- rections to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment at Four-Loop Order, Phys. Rev. D92, 073019 (2015), arXiv:1508.00901 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Holdom, TwoU(1)’s andεcharge shifts, Physics Let- ters B166, 196 (1986)

    B. Holdom, TwoU(1)’s andεcharge shifts, Physics Let- ters B166, 196 (1986)

    work page 1986

  50. [50]

    Galison and A

    P. Galison and A. Manohar, TWO Z’s OR NOT TWO Z’s?, Phys. Lett. B136, 279 (1984)

    work page 1984

  51. [51]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  52. [52]

    Portal Connecting Dark Photons and Axions

    K. Kaneta, H.-S. Lee, and S. Yun, Portal Connecting Dark Photons and Axions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 101802 (2017), arXiv:1611.01466 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    W. R. Inc., Mathematica, Version 12.1, champaign, IL, 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy, Computer Physics Communications 180, 1614 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Christensen, P

    N. Christensen, P. de Aquino, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, and S. Schumann, A comprehensive approach to new physics simulations, The European Physical Journal C71, 10.1140/epjc/s10052- 011-1541-5 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2011

  56. [56]

    Alloul, N

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, 7 and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 – A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Computer Physics Communi- cations185, 2250 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [57]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New devel- opments in FeynCalc 9.0, Computer Physics Communi- cations207, 432 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Computer Physics Communications256, 107478 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Computer Physics Communications306, 109357 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Böhm, and A. Denner, Feyn Calc - Computer-algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Computer Physics Communications64, 345 (1991)

    work page 1991

  61. [61]

    Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Computer Physics Communications 140, 418 (2001)

    T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Computer Physics Communications 140, 418 (2001)

    work page 2001

  62. [62]

    H. H. Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Computer Physics Communications197, 276 (2015)

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    H. H. Patel, Package -X 2.0: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Computer Physics Communications218, 66 (2017). END MA TTER Positive semidefiniteness ofImMA→A(−s−iϵ) We have M(−s−iϵ) = ∑ i,j,k,l Mk,l i,j(−s−iϵ)aibja∗ kb∗ l = ∑ i,j,k,l M−i,l −k,j(s+iϵ)aibja∗ kb∗ l = ∑ i,j,k,l Mk,l i,j(s+iϵ)a−kbja∗ −ib∗ l , (E.1) using ...

    work page 2017