Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 116 references

LISA can set stronger limits than Earth-based experiments on quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter, free of screening.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 10:39 UTC pith:6HHI67PM

load-bearing objection Solid LISA forecast for quadratic ULDM: first non-gravitational dilaton/axion reach, single-constellation gravity re-analysis, and a clean screening argument that actually holds. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08248 v1 pith:6HHI67PM submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Probing Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Xucheng Gan , Hyungjin Kim , Anna-Malin Lemke , Andrea Mitridate This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords ultralight dark matterquadratic couplingsLISAtime-delay interferometryscreeningstochastic gravitational-wave backgrounddilatonQCD axion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper forecasts how the future space-based gravitational-wave detector LISA will respond to ultralight dark matter that couples quadratically to ordinary matter. Because the coupling is quadratic, the dark-matter field produces two distinct signals: a coherent oscillation at twice the particle mass and a stochastic band at frequencies set by the particles’ kinetic energy. The authors derive both signals for LISA’s time-delay interferometry channels, generate realistic mock data that include instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds, and run a Bayesian analysis. They conclude that LISA can improve on existing terrestrial and astrophysical bounds for masses roughly between 10^{-19} and 10^{-9} eV, and that the same signals are free of the density-induced screening that suppresses sensitivity in ground-based clocks, equivalence-principle tests, and pulsar timing. The result matters because it turns a gravitational-wave observatory into a direct probe of the local dark-matter density and of non-gravitational quadratic couplings that are otherwise hard to reach.

Core claim

LISA can surpass present constraints on both the local abundance of gravitationally coupled ultralight dark matter and the strength of its quadratic non-gravitational couplings to Standard-Model fields, in two mass windows set by the coherent and stochastic parts of the quadratic signal, and these signals remain unscreened because LISA operates far from dense environments with compact test masses.

What carries the argument

The power spectrum of the quadratic operator ϕ^{2}, which splits into a narrow “fast-mode” peak at ω = 2m_ϕ and a broadband “slow-mode” continuum at ω ≲ m_ϕ σ^{2}; this spectrum completely determines the single-link and TDI response of LISA once the effective potential that couples to the test-mass acceleration is specified.

Load-bearing premise

The dark-matter field at the LISA spacecraft can be treated as an unperturbed plane-wave superposition drawn from the standard galactic halo distribution, with screening and solar-potential corrections remaining negligible.

What would settle it

Once LISA flies, the absence of excess power in the A and E channels at twice the candidate mass (coherent search) or in the broadband kinetic-energy window (stochastic search), after the T-channel noise calibration and astrophysical-foreground subtraction described in the paper, would rule out the projected coupling strengths.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single LISA constellation can already constrain the local dark-matter density at levels previously quoted only for multi-constellation cross-correlation analyses.
  • For dilaton-like and light-QCD-axion quadratic couplings, LISA will probe regions of parameter space currently limited by MICROSCOPE, atomic clocks, BBN, and NANOGrav, especially above ~10^{-14} eV.
  • Because screening is negligible, any future detection would map directly onto the vacuum coupling strength rather than an environmentally suppressed effective value.
  • The same formalism applies to other space-based interferometers once their arm lengths and noise curves are inserted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the local density is higher than the large-scale average, LISA’s coherent-channel limits would translate into even stronger coupling bounds, turning the mission into a local-density meter as well as a coupling probe.
  • Cross-correlation with a second constellation (Taiji, TianQin) would mainly help the gravitational channel; for direct quadratic couplings the short coherence length already suppresses inter-detector correlations, so single-detector analyses remain the primary tool.
  • The same quadratic-signal template could be adapted to atom-interferometer or lunar-laser-ranging data sets that share LISA’s low-frequency band.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper forecasts the sensitivity of LISA to ultralight dark matter (ULDM) with quadratic couplings to the Standard Model. Because the interaction is quadratic, the ULDM field induces both a coherent (fast) signal at ω = 2m_φ and a stochastic (slow) signal at ω ≲ m_φ σ². The authors derive the single-link phase response (acceleration plus residual Shapiro delay after TDI cancellation), map it to Michelson and AET TDI variables, and perform a Bayesian analysis on noise-plus-foreground mock AET data with T-channel noise calibration. They present projected limits on the local ULDM density (gravitational coupling) and on dilaton-like and light-QCD-axion couplings, arguing that LISA can improve on existing terrestrial and astrophysical bounds in parts of the mass windows ~10^{-19}–10^{-15} eV (coherent) and ~10^{-14}–10^{-9} eV (stochastic), and that LISA is free from the environmental screening that limits Earth-based probes.

Significance. If the projections hold, the work identifies a concrete, near-term science case for LISA beyond gravitational waves: direct constraints on the solar-system ULDM density and on quadratic non-gravitational couplings in mass ranges where screening weakens ground-based experiments. Strengths include a careful first-principles derivation of the single-link and TDI responses (Appendix A), an explicit fast/slow power-spectrum decomposition tied to the quadratic operator, a standard and well-documented Bayesian forecast pipeline on AET mock data, and a quantitative argument (Sec. VI.A) that LISA test masses remain unscreened over the entire parameter space shown. The re-analysis showing that a single LISA constellation can match earlier multi-constellation gravitational forecasts is also useful for mission planning.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. IV.C states that the T channel is used to calibrate A and P “since gravitational wave and dark matter signals are suppressed in this channel.” For GW this is correct at low frequency, but for ULDM it is not generally true. From Eqs. (34)–(35) and (42)–(43), in the short-wavelength limit relevant to the stochastic search (I_XX, I_XY → 1) one finds S_TT ∝ 16 sin²(ωL)(1 − cos ωL)² S_δ, which is not suppressed. The noise-only mock-data forecasts remain valid because no signal is injected, but the justification is incorrect and the pipeline would bias A, P if applied to data containing a stochastic ULDM signal. Please correct the statement, give the ULDM T-channel response explicitly, and discuss implications for a real-data analysis.
  2. The central claim that LISA “can surpass current constraints” (abstract, Sec. V, Figs. 3–4) depends on a fair comparison with MICROSCOPE, atomic clocks, and related bounds. Sec. VI.A notes that terrestrial screening becomes important for |g| ≳ 10^9, which overlaps much of the coupling range plotted. The manuscript does not state whether the literature curves shown already incorporate screening (or the associated saturation of sensitivity) or are unscreened extrapolations. Please clarify the screening treatment of each external bound and, where needed, replot or annotate so that the regions of genuine improvement are unambiguous.
minor comments (6)
  1. Introduction, paragraph on screening: “Thisscreening effectsignificantly” — missing spaces (typo).
  2. Sec. II / footnote 1: the few-percent plane-wave vs. solar-potential correction is stated but not shown; a brief reference or estimate would help readers assess residual systematics for the density limits in Fig. 2.
  3. Eqs. (37)–(39) and App. A.2: the response integrals I_XX, I_XY are written under L_ij = L. A short remark that 1.5-generation TDI still cancels the leading common Shapiro piece for unequal arms (as claimed in the text) would make the equal-arm plots easier to interpret.
  4. Table II and Sec. IV.C: several galactic-foreground parameters are fixed to injected values (“assumed known”). A one-sentence robustness check (or reference) that floating them does not move the ULDM limits would strengthen the forecast.
  5. Fig. 4: the QCD-axion line is shown but LISA does not reach it; the caption or text could more clearly flag that the projected reach applies to fine-tuned or mass-suppressed axion models, as already noted in Sec. V.C.
  6. Notation: the effective coupling g in Eq. (19) and the dilaton charges d_i / Q in Sec. V.B are clear once defined, but an early cross-reference would reduce confusion when reading Sec. III before Sec. V.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: LISA forecasts follow from independent single-link/TDI response functions, external noise models, and mock-data Bayesian analysis; minor self-citation on gravitational re-analysis is non-load-bearing.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. I (Introduction) and Sec. V.A]
    "We also revisit the analysis of stochastic signals produced by ULDM gravitational interactions. The sensitivity of LISA to such signals was already estimated in Ref. [25], but the estimate was obtained by assuming that two LISA-like constellations would operate at the same time... Here we show that even a single LISA constellation can place upper limits on the DM abundance near the solar system comparable to those of Ref. [25]."

    Ref. [25] shares an author (H. Kim). The comparison is non-load-bearing: the paper re-derives the single-constellation gravitational spectrum independently via the same response functions used for non-gravitational couplings, and the primary claims concern non-gravitational dilaton/axion couplings plus screening immunity, neither of which relies on the multi-constellation result of [25].

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. ULDM is expanded as a classical Gaussian random field with Maxwell-Boltzmann momenta (Eqs. 6–9); the quadratic power spectrum splits into fast/slow modes (Eqs. 11–13) by direct ensemble averaging. Single-link phase observables are obtained from the geodesic equation and test-mass acceleration (Eqs. 15–26, App. A.1), then mapped to Michelson/AET TDI variables via linear combinations of delay operators (Eqs. 30–43). Noise and galactic/extragalactic foregrounds are taken from external LISA literature (Eqs. 45–56, Table I) with no free parameters fitted to the target ULDM signals. Mock AET data are generated without injected signal (Eqs. 57–62) and analyzed with a standard Gaussian+log-normal likelihood (Eqs. 63–65) whose priors on astrophysical amplitudes are literature values (Table II). Projected limits (Figs. 2–4) are therefore upper bounds on mock noise, not re-labeled fits. The only self-citation of note is the gravitational-density re-analysis relative to Ref. [25] (same first author); it is presented as a consistency check for a single constellation and is not used to justify the primary non-gravitational or screening claims. Screening immunity follows from a direct estimate of the in-medium mass correction for LISA test-mass size/density (Eq. 77), which lies far above the plotted couplings. No definitional identity, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or ansatz smuggling appears.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central forecasts rest on standard ULDM wave statistics, LISA noise models taken from mission documents, and the assumption that quadratic couplings induce only acceleration and Shapiro signals at leading order. No new particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are either mission-specified noise amplitudes or literature priors on astrophysical foregrounds.

free parameters (3)
  • A (TM acceleration noise amplitude) = 3 (nominal)
    Set to nominal value 3 with ±20 % Gaussian prior; controls the low-frequency noise floor that limits stochastic ULDM sensitivity.
  • P (OMS noise amplitude) = 15 (nominal)
    Set to nominal value 15 with ±20 % Gaussian prior; controls high-frequency noise that limits coherent-signal reach.
  • α_gal, α_EG and related galactic/extragalactic foreground parameters = literature values (e.g. α_gal = -7.84)
    Taken from literature fits (Table I) and given Gaussian or fixed priors; they set the astrophysical background against which ULDM is searched.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption ULDM is a classical Gaussian random field with isotropic Maxwell-Boltzmann momentum distribution (σ ≈ 160 km/s) and plane-wave expansion valid outside dense bodies.
    Sec. II; standard halo model plus few-percent estimate that solar potential corrections are small.
  • domain assumption Quadratic couplings induce only acceleration (∇ϕ²) and Shapiro (Φ+Ψ) signals at leading order; size-change and photon-dispersion effects are sub-dominant.
    Sec. III and VI.C; order-of-magnitude estimates suppress other channels by 10^{-9} or more.
  • domain assumption LISA TDI variables (Michelson XYZ → AET) cancel laser frequency noise even for unequal arms; equal-arm analytic expressions suffice for forecasts.
    Sec. III.B; standard TDI literature plus explicit check that leading Shapiro term cancels.
  • domain assumption Bright resolvable GW sources can be perfectly subtracted, leaving only Gaussian stationary noise + foregrounds + ULDM.
    Sec. IV.A; common assumption in LISA stochastic-background forecasts.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 37463 in / 2616 out tokens · 28430 ms · 2026-07-10T10:39:16.208936+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ultralight dark matter can interact with Standard Model particles via gravitational and non-gravitational interactions. Through such interactions, it can leave distinctive signals in gravitational-wave experiments. In this work, we investigate signals induced by ultralight dark matter quadratically coupled to the Standard Model in the future space-borne gravitational-wave detector, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). Due to the quadratic nature of the coupling, dark matter signals appear at two distinct frequencies: the frequency corresponding to twice the dark matter mass, and frequencies below the typical dark matter kinetic energy. We analyze both contributions and show that LISA can surpass current constraints from terrestrial and astrophysical probes in certain mass ranges. We also find that dark matter signals in LISA are free from screening effects which significantly limit the sensitivity of terrestrial experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08248 by Andrea Mitridate, Anna-Malin Lemke, Hyungjin Kim, Xucheng Gan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spacetime diagram showing the worldlines of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Projected LISA sensitivities to a gravitationally cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Projected LISA sensitivities to quadratically-coupled dilaton-like ULDM with couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Projected LISA sensitivity to a light QCD ax [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 94 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Signal Derivation Consider a single-link detector setup as depicted in Fig. 1. The detector consists of two test masses, or two observers, TM i and TM j. A laser is transmitted from TMj at coordinate timet t, and is received at TM i att. The transmitted laser is mixed with a local laser at TM i, 14 and the phase difference is measured with a phasemeter. T...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Signal Spectrum In this appendix, we provide a detailed computation of the cross-power spectral densityS ij,ℓm(f) reported in Eq. (28). We first begin by proving the relation between the power spectrum of potentialsP U(k) and that of the quadratic operatorP ϕ2(k), i.e. Eq. (29). For the non- gravitational interaction,U=gϕ 2/2M2 pl, and hence the proof is ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Untangling the merger history of massive black holes with LISA

    S. A. Hughes, “Untangling the merger history of 18 massive black holes with LISA,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.331(2002) 805, arXiv:astro-ph/0108483

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Reconstructing the massive black hole cosmic history through gravitational waves

    A. Sesana, J. Gair, E. Berti, and M. Volonteri, “Reconstructing the massive black hole cosmic history through gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044036,arXiv:1011.5893 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. I: Supermassive black hole binaries

    A. Kleinet al., “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 2, (2016) 024003, arXiv:1511.05581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Intermediate and Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspirals -- Astrophysics, Science Applications and Detection using LISA

    P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. Coleman Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak, “Astrophysics, detection and science applications of intermediate- and extreme mass-ratio inspirals,”Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) R113–R169, arXiv:astro-ph/0703495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 10, (2017) 103012,arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy

    C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mihaylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, “The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51(2019) 42,arXiv:1903.03686 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    The gravitational wave signal from the Galactic disk population of binaries containing two compact objects

    G. Nelemans, L. R. Yungelson, and S. F. Portegies Zwart, “The gravitational wave signal from the galactic disk population of binaries containing two compact objects,”Astron. Astrophys.375(2001) 890–898,arXiv:astro-ph/0105221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Gravitational-wave emission from compact Galactic binaries

    S. Nissanke, M. Vallisneri, G. Nelemans, and T. A. Prince, “Gravitational-wave emission from compact Galactic binaries,”Astrophys. J.758(2012) 131, arXiv:1201.4613 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Prospects for detection of detached double white dwarf binaries with Gaia, LSST and LISA

    V. Korol, E. M. Rossi, P. J. Groot, G. Nelemans, S. Toonen, and A. G. A. Brown, “Prospects for detection of detached double white dwarf binaries with Gaia, LSST and LISA,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470no. 2, (2017) 1894–1910,arXiv:1703.02555 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    LISA verification binaries with updated distances from Gaia Data Release 2

    T. Kupfer, V. Korol, S. Shah, G. Nelemans, T. R. Marsh, G. Ramsay, P. J. Groot, D. T. H. Steeghs, and E. M. Rossi, “LISA verification binaries with updated distances from Gaia Data Release 2,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.480no. 1, (2018) 302–309, arXiv:1805.00482 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Identifying LISA verification binaries among the Galactic population of double white dwarfs

    E. Finch, G. Bartolucci, D. Chucherko, B. G. Patterson, V. Korol, A. Klein, D. Bandopadhyay, H. Middleton, C. J. Moore, and A. Vecchio, “Identifying LISA verification binaries among the Galactic population of double white dwarfs,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522no. 4, (2023) 5358–5373, arXiv:2210.10812 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Capriniet al., “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,”JCAP04(2016) 001, arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA

    P. Auclairet al., “Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,”JCAP04 (2020) 034,arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    C. Capriniet al., “Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,” JCAP03(2020) 024,arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]. [17]LISA Cosmology Working GroupCollaboration, P. Auclairet al., “Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,”Living Rev. Rel.26 no. 1, (2023) 5,arXiv:2204.05434 [astro-ph.CO]. [18]LISA Cos...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Direct Detection of Dark Matter with Space-based Laser Interferometers

    A. W. Adams and J. S. Bloom, “Direct detection of dark matter with space-based laser interferometers,” arXiv:astro-ph/0405266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Search for Small-Mass Black Hole Dark Matter with Space-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors

    N. Seto and A. Cooray, “Search for small-mass black hole dark matter with space-based gravitational wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 063512, arXiv:astro-ph/0405216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    Searching for Dark Clumps with Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    S. Baum, M. A. Fedderke, and P. W. Graham, “Searching for dark clumps with gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 6, (2022) 063015, arXiv:2206.14832 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Laser Interferometers as Dark Matter Detectors

    E. D. Hall, R. X. Adhikari, V. V. Frolov, H. M¨ uller, M. Pospelov, and R. X. Adhikari, “Laser Interferometers as Dark Matter Detectors,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 8, (2018) 083019,arXiv:1605.01103 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Macroscopic Dark Matter Detection with Gravitational Wave Experiments

    Y. Du, V. S. H. Lee, Y. Wang, and K. M. Zurek, “Macroscopic dark matter detection with gravitational wave experiments,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 12, (2023) 122003,arXiv:2306.13122 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Detecting ultralight axion dark matter wind with laser interferometers

    A. Aoki and J. Soda, “Detecting ultralight axion dark matter wind with laser interferometers,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26no. 07, (2016) 1750063,arXiv:1608.05933 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Gravitational Interaction of Ultralight Dark Matter with Interferometers

    H. Kim, “Gravitational interaction of ultralight dark matter with interferometers,”JCAP12(2023) 018, arXiv:2306.13348 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Detecting Ultralight Dark Matter Gravitationally with Laser Interferometers in Space

    J.-C. Yu, Y. Cao, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, “Detecting ultralight dark matter gravitationally with laser interferometers in space,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 2, (2024) 023025,arXiv:2404.04333 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Detecting gravitational signatures of dark matter with atom gradiometers

    L. Badurina, Y. Du, V. S. H. Lee, Y. Wang, and K. M. Zurek, “Detecting gravitational signatures of dark matter with atom gradiometers,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 6, (2025) 063014,arXiv:2505.00781 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Searching for Dark Photon Dark Matter with Gravitational Wave Detectors

    A. Pierce, K. Riles, and Y. Zhao, “Searching for Dark Photon Dark Matter with Gravitational Wave Detectors,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 6, (2018) 061102, arXiv:1801.10161 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    On the detectability of ultralight scalar field dark matter with gravitational-wave detectors

    S. Morisaki and T. Suyama, “Detectability of ultralight scalar field dark matter with gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D100 no. 12, (2019) 123512,arXiv:1811.05003 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Novel signatures of dark matter in laser-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors

    H. Grote and Y. V. Stadnik, “Novel signatures of dark matter in laser-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. Res.1no. 3, (2019) 033187, arXiv:1906.06193 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Improved sensitivity of interferometric gravitational wave detectors to ultralight vector dark matter from the finite light-traveling time

    S. Morisaki, T. Fujita, Y. Michimura, H. Nakatsuka, and I. Obata, “Improved sensitivity of interferometric 19 gravitational wave detectors to ultralight vector dark matter from the finite light-traveling time,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 5, (2021) L051702,arXiv:2011.03589 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Sensitivity of Space-based Gravitational-Wave Interferometers to Ultralight Bosonic Fields and Dark Matter

    J.-C. Yu, Y.-H. Yao, Y. Tang, and Y.-L. Wu, “Sensitivity of space-based gravitational-wave interferometers to ultralight bosonic fields and dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 083007, arXiv:2307.09197 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Probing Stochastic Ultralight Dark Matter with Space-based Gravitational-Wave Interferometers

    Y.-H. Yao and Y. Tang, “Probing stochastic ultralight dark matter with space-based gravitational-wave interferometers,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 9, (2024) 095015,arXiv:2404.01494 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Signatures of Ultralight Dark Matter in Space-Based Laser Interferometers

    T. Jiang and Y. Tang, “Signatures of Ultralight Dark Matter in Space-Based Laser Interferometers,” arXiv:2606.03478 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Stochastic Ultralight Dark Matter Fluctuations in Pulsar Timing Arrays

    H. Kim and A. Mitridate, “Stochastic ultralight dark matter fluctuations in pulsar timing arrays,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 5, (2024) 055017,arXiv:2312.12225 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Simulations of Shapiro, Gravitational, and Doppler time delays in pulsar networks for ultralight dark matter,

    A. Eberhardt, Q. Liang, and E. G. M. Ferreira, “Simulations of Shapiro, Gravitational, and Doppler time delays in pulsar networks for ultralight dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 12, (2025) 123036, arXiv:2411.18051 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Pulsar timing detection of ultralight vector dark matter,

    J. A. Dror and Q. Wei, “Pulsar timing detection of ultralight vector dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 7, (2025) 075024,arXiv:2505.22719 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Probing Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter with Pulsar Timing Arrays

    X. Gan, H. Kim, and A. Mitridate, “Probing Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter with Pulsar Timing Arrays,”arXiv:2510.13945 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Astrometric Search for Ultralight Dark Matter

    H. Kim, “Astrometric search for ultralight dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 8, (2024) 083031, arXiv:2406.03539 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Prospects for gravitational wave and ultra-light dark matter detection with binary resonances beyond the secular approximation

    J. W. Foster, D. Blas, A. Bourgoin, A. Hees, M. Herrero-Valea, A. C. Jenkins, and X. Xue, “Prospects for gravitational wave and ultra-light dark matter detection with binary resonances beyond the secular approximation,”arXiv:2504.16988 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks

    A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang, and K. Van Tilburg, “Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,”Phys. Rev. D91no. 1, (2015) 015015, arXiv:1405.2925 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons

    A. Hees, J. Gu´ ena, M. Abgrall, S. Bize, and P. Wolf, “Searching for an oscillating massive scalar field as a dark matter candidate using atomic hyperfine frequency comparisons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 6, (2016) 061301,arXiv:1604.08514 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Precision Metrology Meets Cosmology: Improved Constraints on Ultralight Dark Matter from Atom-Cavity Frequency Comparisons

    C. J. Kennedy, E. Oelker, J. M. Robinson, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, W. R. Milner, G. E. Marti, A. Derevianko, and J. Ye, “Precision Metrology Meets Cosmology: Improved Constraints on Ultralight Dark Matter from Atom-Cavity Frequency Comparisons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 20, (2020) 201302, arXiv:2008.08773 [physics.atom-ph]. [44]BACONCollaboration, K. Beloyet ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Search for oscillations of fundamental constants using molecular spectroscopy

    R. Oswaldet al., “Search for Dark-Matter-Induced Oscillations of Fundamental Constants Using Molecular Spectroscopy,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 3, (2022) 031302,arXiv:2111.06883 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Analysis of atomic-clock data to constrain variations of fundamental constants

    N. Sherrillet al., “Analysis of atomic-clock data to constrain variations of fundamental constants,”New J. Phys.25no. 9, (2023) 093012,arXiv:2302.04565 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Improved limits on the coupling of ultralight bosonic dark matter to photons from optical atomic clock comparisons

    M. Filzinger, S. D¨ orscher, R. Lange, J. Klose, M. Steinel, E. Benkler, E. Peik, C. Lisdat, and N. Huntemann, “Improved Limits on the Coupling of Ultralight Bosonic Dark Matter to Photons from Optical Atomic Clock Comparisons,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 130no. 25, (2023) 253001,arXiv:2301.03433 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Probing Ultralight Dark Matter at the Mega-Planck Scale with the Thorium Nuclear Clock,

    J. Arakawaet al., “Probing Ultralight Dark Matter at the Mega-Planck Scale with the Thorium Nuclear Clock,”arXiv:2602.16804 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik, and P. Wolf, “Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 6, (2018) 064051,arXiv:1807.04512 [gr-qc]. [50]MICROSCOPECollaboration, P. Touboulet al., “Space test of the Equivalence Principle: first results of the MICROSCOPE mission,”Class. Quant. Grav. 36no. 22, (2...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Background-Induced Forces from Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter

    T. Bouley, X. Gan, H. Xu, and T.-T. Yu, “Background-Induced Forces from Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter,”arXiv:2606.28481 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    A directional force template for quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter

    D. Brzeminski and A. Pierce, “A directional force template for quadratically coupled ultralight dark matter,”arXiv:2606.28491 [hep-ph]. [54]TianQinCollaboration, J. Luoet al., “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav.33no. 3, (2016) 035010, arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]. [55]TianQinCollaboration, J. Meiet al., “The TianQin ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,”Natl. Sci. Rev.4no. 5, (2017) 685–686

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects

    Y. Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang, “Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects,”Nature Astron.5no. 9, (2021) 881–889, arXiv:2109.07442 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,

    S. Kawamuraet al., “The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,”Class. Quant. Grav.28 (2011) 094011

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    Gravitational Focusing of Wave Dark Matter

    H. Kim and A. Lenoci, “Gravitational focusing of wave dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 6, (2022) 063032, arXiv:2112.05718 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Detecting dark matter waves with precision measurement tools

    A. Derevianko, “Detecting dark-matter waves with a network of precision-measurement tools,”Phys. Rev. A 97no. 4, (2018) 042506,arXiv:1605.09717 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Revealing the Dark Matter Halo with Axion Direct Detection

    J. W. Foster, N. L. Rodd, and B. R. Safdi, “Revealing the Dark Matter Halo with Axion Direct Detection,” Phys. Rev. D97no. 12, (2018) 123006, arXiv:1711.10489 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Stochastic fluctuations of bosonic dark matter

    G. P. Centerset al., “Stochastic fluctuations of bosonic dark matter,”Nature Commun.12no. 1, (2021) 7321, arXiv:1905.13650 [astro-ph.CO]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    A Quantum Description of Wave Dark Matter

    D. Y. Cheong, N. L. Rodd, and L.-T. Wang, “Quantum description of wave dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 1, (2025) 015028,arXiv:2408.04696 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Annual Modulation of Dark Matter: A Review

    K. Freese, M. Lisanti, and C. Savage, “Colloquium: Annual modulation of dark matter,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 85(2013) 1561–1581,arXiv:1209.3339 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    Probing an ultralight QCD axion with electromagnetic quadratic interaction

    H. Kim, A. Lenoci, G. Perez, and W. Ratzinger, “Probing an ultralight QCD axion with electromagnetic quadratic interaction,”Phys. Rev. D 109no. 1, (2024) 015030,arXiv:2307.14962 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Algorithms for unequal-arm Michelson interferometers,

    G. Giampieri, R. W. Hellings, M. Tinto, and J. E. Faller, “Algorithms for unequal-arm Michelson interferometers,”Optics Communications123no. 4-6, (Feb., 1996) 669–678.https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/0030401895006117

    work page arXiv 1996

  60. [60]

    Cancellation of laser noise in an unequal-arm interferometer detector of gravitational radiation,

    M. Tinto and J. W. Armstrong, “Cancellation of laser noise in an unequal-arm interferometer detector of gravitational radiation,”Physical Review D59no. 10, (Apr., 1999) 102003.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.102003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.102003 1999

  61. [61]

    Time-Delay Interferometry for Space-based Gravitational Wave Searches,

    J. W. Armstrong, F. B. Estabrook, and M. Tinto, “Time-Delay Interferometry for Space-based Gravitational Wave Searches,”The Astrophysical Journal527no. 2, (Dec., 1999) 814–826.https: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/308110

    work page doi:10.1086/308110 1999

  62. [62]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background reconstruction for a non-equilateral and unequal-noise LISA constellation

    O. Hartwig, M. Lilley, M. Muratore, and M. Pieroni, “Stochastic gravitational wave background reconstruction for a non-equilateral and unequal-noise LISA constellation,”arXiv:2303.15929 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Otto,Time-Delay Interferometry Simulations for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    M. Otto,Time-Delay Interferometry Simulations for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. PhD thesis, Leibniz U., Hannover, 2015

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Improved reconstruction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA

    R. Flauger, N. Karnesis, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and J. Torrado, “Improved reconstruction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA,”JCAP01(2021) 059, arXiv:2009.11845 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu, “The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves,” Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 10, (2019) 105011, arXiv:1803.01944 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations

    S. Babak, A. Petiteau, and M. Hewitson, “LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations,”arXiv:2108.01167 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Detecting a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in the presence of a Galactic Foreground and Instrument Noise

    M. R. Adams and N. J. Cornish, “Detecting a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in the presence of a Galactic Foreground and Instrument Noise,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 2, (2014) 022001, arXiv:1307.4116 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Galactic binary science with the new LISA design

    N. Cornish and T. Robson, “Galactic binary science with the new LISA design.” Mar., 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09858v2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    LISA Sensitivity to Gravitational Waves from Sound Waves

    K. Schmitz, “LISA Sensitivity to Gravitational Waves from Sound Waves,”Symmetry12no. 9, (Sept., 2020) 1477.http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10789. arXiv:2005.10789 [hep-ph]. [77]LISA Cosmology Working GroupCollaboration, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Y. Cui, S. Kuroyanagi, M. Lewicki, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, I. Y. Rybak, L. Sousa, and J. M. Wachter, “Gravitational waves...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    The promise of multi-band gravitational wave astronomy

    A. Sesana, “Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116no. 23, (2016) 231102, arXiv:1602.06951 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA

    C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, R. Flauger, G. Nardini, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and G. Tasinato, “Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA,” 1906.09244.http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09244. [81]WMAPCollaboration, L. Verdeet al., “First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Par...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  72. [72]

    Radical Compression of Cosmic Microwave Background Data

    J. R. Bond, A. H. Jaffe, and L. E. Knox, “Radical compression of cosmic microwave background data,” Astrophys. J.533(2000) 19, arXiv:astro-ph/9808264

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  73. [73]

    Cosmological Parameters from Cosmic Background Imager Observations and Comparisons with BOOMERANG, DASI, and MAXIMA

    J. L. Sieverset al., “Cosmological parameters from Cosmic Background Imager observations and comparisons with BOOMERANG, DASI, and MAXIMA,”Astrophys. J.591(2003) 599–622, arXiv:astro-ph/0205387

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    Likelihood Analysis of CMB Temperature and Polarization Power Spectra

    S. Hamimeche and A. Lewis, “Likelihood Analysis of CMB Temperature and Polarization Power Spectra,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 103013,arXiv:0801.0554 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Likelihoods for Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Data Analysis

    G. Franciolini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and J. D. Romano, “Likelihoods for stochastic gravitational wave background data analysis,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 103516,arXiv:2505.24695 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Can dark matter induce cosmological evolution of the fundamental constants of Nature?

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, “Can dark matter induce cosmological evolution of the fundamental constants of Nature?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.115no. 20, (2015) 201301,arXiv:1503.08540 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    BBN constraints on universally-coupled ultralight scalar dark matter

    S. Sibiryakov, P. Sørensen, and T.-T. Yu, “BBN constraints on universally-coupled ultralight scalar dark matter,”JHEP12(2020) 075,arXiv:2006.04820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Constraints on Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Quadratic Couplings

    T. Bouley, P. Sørensen, and T.-T. Yu, “Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings,”JHEP03(2023) 104,arXiv:2211.09826 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Early Universe Constraints on Variations in Fundamental Constants Induced by Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,

    S. Ghosh, K. K. Boddy, and T.-T. Yu, “Early Universe Constraints on Variations in Fundamental Constants Induced by Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter,” arXiv:2511.14532 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    The Local Dark Matter Density

    J. I. Read, “The Local Dark Matter Density,”J. Phys. G41(2014) 063101,arXiv:1404.1938 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.