Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

Holographic zeros and poles from apparent singularities

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 2 Sep 2026 · 36 references

Pith's verdict: A clean, self-contained analytic framework for spectral function zeros from apparent singularities in holographic equations, with explicit assumptions and worked examples; the main residual risk is scope (non-confluent, single-set assumptions) which the paper flags.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on September 8, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2609.03023 (version 1)
Pith IDHITMB3UQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEdwan Pr\'eau. "Holographic zeros and poles from apparent singularities." arXiv:2609.03023 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HITMB3UQ
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

This paper shows that when an apparent singularity of a holographic fluctuation equation approaches the boundary, the spectral function can develop a zero or a pole, with universal scaling for one class of potentials, and the holographic…

The reading

Many holographic fluctuation equations contain apparent singularities—places where the potential diverges but the solution remains analytic. This work analyzes what happens when such a singularity moves close to the boundary at r=0. Using an inner/outer matching method, the author shows that the merging singularity can cause the spectral function to gain either a zero or a pole. For the class called (−), there is a universal power-law scaling of the spectral function with the distance of the singularity from the boundary. For the (+) class, the behavior is case-dependent but can be worked out systematically. A key consequence is that the holographic product formula of Dodelson et al. remains valid even when apparent singularities are present, with extra factors accounting for the new zeros.

What carries the argument

The central technique is an inner/outer matching approach. In the inner region (|r| ≪ r₁, where r₁ is the next singularity), the leading-order potential takes the form $V₀^{{in}}$(ζ) = (p₀ + $p₁ζ^{{m}}$ + $p₂ζ^{{2m}}$)/[ζ²($ζ^{{m}}$−1)²] with ζ = r/rₚ. This corresponds to a hypergeometric equation after the change of variable u = $ζ^{{m}}$. The apparent nature of the singularity at u=1 forces the hypergeometric parameters to satisfy specific integrality conditions, reducing the inner solution to Jacobi polynomials (given in eqs. (3.23)–(3.24)). Matching the inner solution to the outer solution in the overlap region then relates the near-boundary source and vev, leading to the scaling of the spectral function.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The author discovers that when an apparent singularity of a holographic fluctuation equation merges with the boundary at r=0, the spectral function ρ(ω) can acquire a zero or a pole. The behavior is governed by the class of the potential: for the (−) class, ρ scales as $r^{{2(ν̃−ν)}}$ (a universal power law that yields a zero when ν̃ > ν, a pole when ν̃ < ν, and O(1) when ν̃ = ν); for the (+) class, ρ tends to a finite constant or a pole depending on subleading corrections. The author also establishes that the holographic product formula of [12] continues to apply in the presence of apparent singularities, with the zeros appearing as additional factors in the numerator.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the limit rₚ → 0 is non-confluent (all parameters remain finite) and that the potential can be written as g(r)/H(r)² with a single symmetric set of apparent singularities; if either condition fails—for example, if parameters diverge or multiple distinct singularities approach the boundary simultaneously—the universal scaling and the formula for additional zeros may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The holographic product formula of [12], which writes the spectral function as a product over its poles, remains valid when the bulk fluctuation equation contains apparent singularities, with additional factors for the finite number of zeros that may appear.
  • For the (−) class of potentials, the spectral function always follows the universal scaling ρ ∼ κ^{2n₊−(n₁−1)}, where κ is the parameter that vanishes as the singularity approaches the boundary, making the zero/pole structure completely determined.
  • The method provides a concrete way to compute the location and nature of new zeros (and occasionally poles) in holographic spectral functions without solving the full fluctuation equation.
  • The examples studied—probe gauge field, charged gauge field, and sound-channel metric fluctuations—confirm that the formalism reproduces known results (e.g., simple zeros at ω = ±k, poles at ω = ∓μ₃) and predicts new ones.
  • The classification into (−) and (+) classes, together with the half-integer case, gives a complete taxonomy of possible near-boundary behaviors when an apparent singularity merges with the boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The matching analysis can identify pole-skipping points (where a line of zeros intersects a line of poles) in a new way: the example in Section 5.2.1 shows that ω = ∓μ₃ is exactly such a point, which standard methods usually locate from poles rather than zeros.
  • Because the product formula still holds, one can write down effective low-energy expansions for the spectral function even in theories with apparent singularities, similar to the hydrodynamic approximations in [13] but now accounting for the extra zeros.
  • The assumption of a single symmetric set of apparent singularities may be the most restrictive; if multiple sets or a non-monomial structure appear (as possible in more complicated backgrounds), a full numerical or analytic treatment would be needed, though the present method could still be extended.
  • The technique might be adapted to fermionic spectral functions (the paper mentions straightforward generalization), potentially offering new insights into holographic Fermi surfaces and non-Fermi liquids.
Original abstract

We study general holographic fluctuation equations with apparent singularities, and the associated spectral functions. We consider the regime where an apparent singularity approaches the boundary, for which the near-boundary behavior of solutions can be determined via an inner/outer matching type of calculation. Depending on properties of the equation, we find that the merging of an apparent singularity with the boundary may generate either a zero or a pole for the corresponding spectral function. Our results also indicate that the recently introduced holographic product formula still applies in the presence of apparent singularities.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,591 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.59 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study general holographic fluctuation equations with apparent singularities, and the associated spectral functions. We consider the regime where an apparent singularity approaches the boundary, for which the near-boundary behavior of solutions can be determined via an inner/outer matching type of calculation. Depending on properties of the equation, we find that the merging of an apparent singularity with the boundary may generate either a zero or a pole for the corresponding spectral function. Our results also indicate that the recently introduced holographic product formula still applies in the presence of apparent singularities.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study general holographic fluctuation equations with apparent singularities, and the associated spectral functions. contribution 0.97 0.89 0.05 asserted 0.76
s1 We consider the regime where an apparent singularity approaches the boundary, for which the near-boundary behavior of solutions can be determined via an inner/outer matching type of calculation. method 0.91 0.48 0.05 asserted 0.90
s2 Depending on properties of the equation, we find that the merging of an apparent singularity with the boundary may generate either a zero or a pole for the corresponding spectral function. result 1.00 0.95 0.75 hedged possibility 0.54
s3 Our results also indicate that the recently introduced holographic product formula still applies in the presence of apparent singularities. result 0.87 0.76 0.15 hedged possibility 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.