Pith.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · arXiv:2609.07878 v1 · submitted 7 Sep 2026 · 41 references

Nonradial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Polar modes

L. M. Becerra, José F. Rodríguez-Ruiz, E.A. Becerra-Vergara, F. D. Lora-Clavijo

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“In this work, we study the polar perturbations of static, spherically symmetric neutron stars with anisotropic pressure in full general relativity, including linear-order perturbations of both the metric and the fluid.”

more of the abstract

We calculate the f-mode frequencies and the corresponding damping times using a consistent treatment of the perturbation of the radial vector kα. In particular, its Lagrangian perturbation Δkα is determined by the metric perturbations and the fluid Lagrangian displacement and is constrained to the (ũ,k̃) plane, where ũα is the normalized fluid four-velocity. This constraint introduces an additional dynamical degree of freedom into the perturbation equations. Considering three equations of state and the Horvat and Bowers-Liang prescriptions for pressure anisotropy, we find that the f-mode frequency increases with stellar mass, ranging from 1 to 3 kHz, while the damping time decreases, ranging from 0.5 to 1.25 s. Increasing anisotropy, in the sense of tangential pressure exceeding radial pressure, generally lowers the oscillation frequency, while its effect on the damping time depends on the anisotropy prescription: the damping time decreases with increasing anisotropy for the Horvat model but increases with increasing anisotropy for the Bowers-Liang model. We further find quasi-universal relations between the real and imaginary parts of the f-mode frequency, MωR and MωI, and the stellar compactness 𝒞 = M/R, which are largely insensitive to the equation of state. Polynomial fits to these relations achieve an accuracy better than 10%, providing a simple phenomenological framework for constraining neutron-star pressure anisotropy through future asteroseismology observations.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4-flash · 9 Sep 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

Holds up, with conditions. Careful derivation of polar f-modes in anisotropic neutron stars with a new closure, but the 20% sensitivity of damping times to that closure at high anisotropy undermines the central claim of <10% accurate universal relations. This line is wrong

3 major objections · 6 minor

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 41 references say.

The paper says, at §IV.A, Table II

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 1 of 3 · major

The central claim that the quasi-universal fits are accurate to better than 10% is not supported across the full parameter space. The authors compare two closures for Δk^α (Eq. 4 vs. δk^θ=0) in the modified Horvat model and find differences in damping time Mω_I up to 20% at high anisotropy (e.g., λ=2.81, Δτ=0.01317 s on a base ~0.07 s, about 19%).

more of objection 1

Since the closure (Eq. 4) is a prescription not derived from microphysics, this sensitivity directly contradicts the claimed <10% accuracy for the highest anisotropies. The comparison is performed for only one EOS (SLy4) and one anisotropy model (modified Horvat), leaving the robustness of the results for the Bowers-Liang model and other EOSs unexamined. The authors must either provide a microphysical justification for the closure or demonstrate that the closure choice does not alter the fitted quantities by more than 10% across the entire parameter space (including all EOSs and both anisotropy prescriptions).

The paper says, at §IV, Eqs. (41)–(43) and Table I

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 2 of 3 · major

The quasi-universal relations are phenomenological polynomial fits to the numerical data; the coefficients in Table I are fitted to the same data they summarize. The statement that the fits achieve accuracy better than 10% is a measure of fit quality, not a test of universality or a prediction.

more of objection 2

The paper should clarify that these relations are descriptive within the computed range and that extrapolation outside that range has not been validated. Moreover, the polynomial for b_i(λ) uses a fourth-order polynomial in λ (Eq. 43) while the a_i(λ) uses third order; the justification for this asymmetry should be stated.

The paper says, at §III, numerical procedure for quasinormal modes

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 3 of 3 · major

The method to locate quasinormal-mode frequencies uses three real trial frequencies and a quadratic approximation for A_out(ω), assuming ω_I ≪ ω_R (the paper notes this property). For modes with larger damping (e.g., high anisotropy where damping times can be short), this approximation may break down. The authors should discuss the accuracy of this method for the largest damping times encountered in their parameter space and quantify any systematic error introduced.

6 minor objections

The paper says, at §II.A, Eqs. (18)–(22)

Pith says: minor objection 1 of 6

The system of equations is listed as six coupled first-order equations, but the enumeration in Appendix A shows Eqs. (A24)–(A29) as six equations; however, Eq. (A30) is algebraic. The main text should clearly state that the dynamical system consists of six ODEs and one algebraic constraint.

The paper says, at Table I

Pith says: minor objection 2 of 6

The notation for fit coefficients is confusing: ˜a_{ij} and ˜b_{ij} are given, but the text uses a_i(λ) and b_i(λ) with polynomials in λ. Clarify that the index i corresponds to the power of C and j (or the second index) corresponds to the power of λ. A representative example of how to reconstruct a_i(λ) would be helpful.

show 4 more

The paper says, at Figure 3

Pith says: minor objection 3 of 6

The relative error panel shows |1 - y_fit/y_num|. Consider also showing the signed relative error to identify systematic biases (e.g., whether the fit systematically over- or underestimates at high compactness).

The paper says, at §IV.A, paragraph before Eq. (44)

Pith says: minor objection 4 of 6

The sentence 'They further require S_c = 0, which implies ∂¯σ / ∂x = O(r^2)' is unclear. Expand the reasoning: why does S_c=0 imply this behavior? Define x before using it.

The paper says, at §IV, Figures 1 and 2

Pith says: minor objection 5 of 6

The color scale for the anisotropy parameter is continuous but the panels show discrete curves. In the printed version, distinguishing values may be difficult. Consider using line styles or markers in addition to color.

The paper says, at General

Pith says: minor objection 6 of 6

The paper states 'relative error of the fit remains below 0.1' (i.e., 10%). However, Table II shows differences in τ up to 20% for the alternative closure. This discrepancy should be explicitly discussed when presenting the fits, noting that the fits only apply under the chosen closure.

What would settle it

Recompute the f-mode frequencies and damping times for the original Horvat and Bowers-Liang models (not the modified Horvat) using the alternative closure δk^θ=0 for all three EOSs (SLy4, GM1Y6, QHC21) and for the largest anisotropy parameters used in the paper (λ_H=1.0, λ_BL=1.0). For each combination, compute the maximum relative difference in Mω_R and Mω_I between the two closures across the range of compactness. If any relative difference exceeds 10%, then the claim of better-than-10% accuracy is not robust against the closure ambiguity. If differences are all ≤10%, the concern is mitigated, though the microphysical justification remains open.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

4 readings by deepseek-v4-flash · 9 Sep 2026

  1. Reader holds up, with conditions confidence moderate
  2. Skeptic agrees 24 s · 18,655 tokens read, 2,471 written
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 16 s · 19,632 tokens read, 1,560 written
  4. Referee major revision: 3 major objections, 6 minor 21 s · 19,102 tokens read, 2,185 written

Not run on this paper: the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

Here's the quick read on arXiv:2609.07878. The paper extends the fully relativistic perturbation formalism for anisotropic neutron stars to polar modes, using a specific closure for the Lagrangian perturbation of the anisotropy vector (Δkα lies in the (u,k) plane). This introduces an extra dynamical degree of freedom for the transverse displacement V. The authors compute f-mode frequencies and damping times for three EOSs and two anisotropy models, fit the dimensionless frequencies to compactness with polynomial coefficients (up to 20 parameters), and claim the fits are accurate to better than 10%.

What's good: The derivation is systematic and presented in enough detail that others can reproduce it. The comparison with the alternative closure (δkθ=0, used in Lau et al. 2024) is honest and explicitly shows where the two prescriptions differ. The paper identifies that the new degree of freedom acts like a shear modulus, which is a physically interesting interpretation. The numerical method is standard (Runge-Kutta + Zerilli matching) and convergence is addressed.

Where the paper is soft: The central claim of 10%-accurate quasi-universal relations rests entirely on the chosen closure. The authors show in Table II that the alternative closure changes damping times by up to 20% at high anisotropy (λ=2.81). That's twice the claimed accuracy. They do not explore whether the universal relation fits themselves shift by more than 10% across the full parameter space under the alternative closure — they only compare a handful of models. If the fits are not robust to this modeling choice, the claim of universality is premature. The polynomial fits themselves are also heavy (up to 20 coefficients) which reduces their predictive value beyond the dataset. The paper is transparent about the ad-hoc nature of the closure, but transparency doesn't fix the fragility.

Who this is for: Specialists working on neutron star asteroseismology and anisotropy. The formalism is a useful contribution, and the code could be a reference. But the main observational claim — that these fits can constrain anisotropy from future GW detections — is only as strong as the closure assumption. A reader building an analysis pipeline should treat the fits as prescription-dependent.

Recommendation: This deserves peer review — the technical work is sound and the problem is important. But referee should strongly request a sensitivity analysis: rerun the universal relation fits under the alternative closure and quantify how the fitted coefficients and residuals change. Without that, the paper's strongest claim is unsupported.

The strongest objection

The central claim of quasi-universal relations with polynomial fits accurate to better than 10% relies on the specific closure for the Lagrangian perturbation of the radial anisotropy vector k^α (Eq. 4: Δk^α lies in the (ũ, k̄) plane). The authors acknowledge that this closure is a prescription, not derived from microphysics, and that an alternative prescription (δk^θ=0, used in e.g. Lau et al. 2024) also respects orthogonality and normalization. In Table II, the authors compare the two closures for the modified Horvat model and find differences in damping time Mω_I up to 20% at high anisotropy (e.g., λ=2.81, ρ_c=10^15.133, Δτ=0.01317 s on a base ~0.07 s, about 19%). Since the claimed accuracy of the fits is better than 10%, a 20% sensitivity to the unvalidated closure directly implies that the central result is not robust for the highest anisotropies, and possibly also for the Bowers-Liang model or other EOSs where the comparison was not performed. Therefore, the argument that the universal relations are accurate to <10% is not supported across the full parameter space without a microphysical justification or a demonstration that the closure choice does not affect the fitted quantities beyond that threshold.

The reader's verdict (CONDITIONAL) already correctly identifies the closure for δk^α as the weakest assumption. The stress-tester confirms that this assumption is load-bearing for the central claim: the claimed <10% accuracy of the quasi-universal fits is contradicted by the authors' own sensitivity comparison showing up to 20% changes in damping time under an alternative plausible closure. The proposed test directly checks whether this sensitivity persists across the full parameter space of the paper. If it does, the accuracy claim must be revised or the closure better justified. Since the reader already built this condition into the verdict (CONDITIONAL), no change is needed; the paper should be published only after the condition is satisfied.

The referee's report

If the results are robust, the work extends relativistic asteroseismology to anisotropic neutron stars and provides a phenomenological tool to constrain pressure anisotropy from future gravitational-wave observations. The derivation is detailed, the code appears to be standard, and the range of equations of state and anisotropy models is reasonable. However, the central claim rests on a closure that is not derived from microphysics and is shown to affect damping times by up to 20% in a comparison test, which undermines the stated accuracy.

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

Neutron stars are so dense that their internal pressure may not be the same in all directions. This anisotropy can arise from strong magnetic fields, superfluidity, or exotic matter. Previous models of neutron star oscillations often assumed isotropic pressure, but recent work has begun to include anisotropy. This paper extends that effort by studying polar (even-parity) oscillations using a consistent treatment of how the anisotropy axis responds when the star is perturbed. The key new feature is that the radial vector associated with the anisotropy is assumed to be carried along with the fluid, introducing an additional dynamical degree of freedom. The authors solve the full Einstein equations for three realistic equations of state and two common anisotropy prescriptions (Bowers-Liang and Horvat). They find that the oscillation frequency (1-3 kHz) generally decreases with stronger anisotropy, while the damping time (0.5-1.25 s) either increases or decreases depending on the model. More importantly, they show that scaled frequency and damping time, when plotted against stellar compactness, fall on nearly universal curves that depend only on the anisotropy strength. They provide polynomial fits with better than 10% accuracy. These relations could be used to infer the degree of anisotropy from future gravitational-wave detections of neutron star oscillations.

Core claim. The paper claims that for anisotropic neutron stars, the dimensionless f-mode frequency Mω_R and damping time Mω_I satisfy quasi-universal relations as functions of compactness C=M/R, with polynomial fits (coefficients given in Table I, depending on anisotropy parameter) accurate to better than 10% across three equations of state and two anisotropy models.

The premise it rests on. The assumption that the Lagrangian perturbation of the radial vector k^α lies in the (u,k) plane (Eq. 4). This prescription is not derived from microphysics; it is a closure motivated by the idea that anisotropy is advected with the fluid. The authors show that alternative prescriptions (e.g., δk^θ=0 used in other works) lead to differences of up to 20% in damping times at high anisotropy, so the central results depend on this unvalidated choice.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In this work, we study the polar perturbations of static, spherically symmetric neutron stars with anisotropic pressure in full general relativity, including linear-order perturbations of both the metric and the fluid. We calculate the f-mode frequencies and the corresponding damping times using a consistent treatment of the perturbation of the radial vector kα. In particular, its Lagrangian perturbation Δkα is determined by the metric perturbations and the fluid Lagrangian displacement and is constrained to the (ũ,k̃) plane, where ũα is the normalized fluid four-velocity. This constraint introduces an additional dynamical degree of freedom into the perturbation equations. Considering three equations of state and the Horvat and Bowers-Liang prescriptions for pressure anisotropy, we find that the f-mode frequency increases with stellar mass, ranging from 1 to 3 kHz, while the damping time decreases, ranging from 0.5 to 1.25 s. Increasing anisotropy, in the sense of tangential pressure exceeding radial pressure, generally lowers the oscillation frequency, while its effect on the damping time depends on the anisotropy prescription: the damping time decreases with increasing anisotropy for the Horvat model but increases with increasing anisotropy for the Bowers-Liang model. We further find quasi-universal relations between the real and imaginary parts of the f-mode frequency, MωR and MωI, and the stellar compactness 𝒞 = M/R, which are largely insensitive to the equation of state. Polynomial fits to these relations achieve an accuracy better than 10%, providing a simple phenomenological framework for constraining neutron-star pressure anisotropy through future asteroseismology observations.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.83

“Polynomial fits to these relations achieve an accuracy better than $10\%$, providing a simple phenomenological framework for constraining neutron-star pressure anisotropy through future asteroseismology observations.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.99

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.14 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In this work, we study the polar perturbations of static, spherically symmetric neutron stars with anisotropic pressure in full general relativity, including linear-order perturbations of both the metric and the fluid. contribution 0.98 0.91 0.04 asserted 0.93
We calculate the $f$-mode frequencies and the corresponding damping times using a consistent treatment of the perturbation of the radial vector $k^\alpha$. method 0.50 0.97 0.06 asserted 1.00
In particular, its Lagrangian perturbation $\Delta k^\alpha$ is determined by the metric perturbations and the fluid Lagrangian displacement and is constrained to the $(\tilde{u},\tilde{k})$ plane, where $\tilde{u}^\alpha$ is the normalized fluid four-velocity. method 0.98 0.79 0.03 asserted 1.00
This constraint introduces an additional dynamical degree of freedom into the perturbation equations. method 0.51 0.63 0.04 asserted 1.00
Considering three equations of state and the Horvat and Bowers-Liang prescriptions for pressure anisotropy, we find that the $f$-mode frequency increases with stellar mass, ranging from $1$ to $3$~kHz, while the damping time decreases, ranging from $0.5$ to $1.25$~s. result 1.00 0.97 0.20 asserted 1.00
Increasing anisotropy, in the sense of tangential pressure exceeding radial pressure, generally lowers the oscillation frequency, while its effect on the damping time depends on the anisotropy prescription: the damping time decreases with increasing anisotropy for the Horvat model but increases with increasing anisotropy for the Bowers-Liang model. result 1.00 0.96 0.25 asserted 0.97
We further find quasi-universal relations between the real and imaginary parts of the $f$-mode frequency, $M\omega_R$ and $M\omega_I$, and the stellar compactness $\mathcal{C}=M/R$, which are largely insensitive to the equation of state. result 1.00 0.97 0.35 asserted 1.00
Polynomial fits to these relations achieve an accuracy better than $10\%$, providing a simple phenomenological framework for constraining neutron-star pressure anisotropy through future asteroseismology observations. interpretation 0.66 0.95 0.51 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.61 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.98

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,764 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Figures (4)
Figure 1 of the paper
Figure 1. Oscillation frequency of the fundamental mode (f-mode) as a function of the stellar mass for different EOS and the
Figure 2 of the paper
Figure 2. Damping time of the fundamental mode (f-mode) as a function of the stellar mass for different EOS and the Bowers
Figure 4 of the paper
Figure 4. Oscillation frequency (top panel) and damping time

Showing 3 of the paper's 4 figures. Figures are the authors', reproduced from the paper.

References (41)
  1. [1] Static Background Configuration The structure equations governing the unperturbed static background configuration are rA′ A =−1 + 1 B + 8πr2 ¯P B ,(A1) rB′ = 1−B−8πr 2¯ϵ,(A2) while the TOV equation takes the form ¯P′ =−( ¯P+ ¯ϵ)A′ 2A− 2¯σ r .(A3) To ensure regularity at the st... on Pith
  2. [2] Polar perturbation equations To improve the numerical behavior, and assuming a harmonic time dependence for the perturbation variables, we perform the following change of variables: H0→r ℓH0(r)eiωt,(A17) H1→iωr ℓ+1H1(r)eiωt,(A18) K→r ℓK(r)eiωt,(A19) W→r ℓ−1W(r)eiωt,(A20) V→r ℓ... on Pith
  3. [3] R. Abbott and et. al., GW170817: Observation of Grav- itational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [4] A. Bauswein and N. Stergioulas, Spectral classifica- tion of gravitational-wave emission and equation of state constraints in binary neutron star mergers, Jour- nal of Physics G Nuclear Physics46, 113002 (2019), arXiv:1901.06969 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [5] N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.299, 1059 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711088 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [6] K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-Radial Pulsa- tion of General-Relativistic Stellar Models. I. Analytic Analysis for L ¿= 2 (1967) on Pith
  7. [7] S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, On the nonradial pulsa- tions of general relativistic stellar models, Astrophys. J. 292, 12 (1985) on Pith
  8. [8] L. Lindblom and S. L. Detweiler, The quadrupole os- cillations of neutron stars., Astrophys. J. Suppl.53, 73 (1983) on Pith
  9. [9] K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes, Living Reviews in Relativity2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [10] S. Chandrasekhar and V. Ferrari, On the non-radial os- cillations of a star, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A432, 247 (1991) on Pith
  11. [11] J. Frieben and L. Rezzolla, Equilibrium models of rela- tivistic stars with a toroidal magnetic field, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.427, 3406 (2012), arXiv:1207.4035 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [12] N. Bucciantini, A. G. Pili, and L. Del Zanna, The role of currents distribution in general relativistic equilibria of magnetized neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 3278 (2015), arXiv:1412.5347 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [13] A. Sokolov, Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liq- uid, Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys.52, 575 (1980) on Pith
  14. [14] B. Carter and D. Langlois, Relativistic models for superconducting-superfluid mixtures, Nuclear Physics B 531, 478 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9806024 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [15] E. A. Becerra-Vergara, S. Mojica, F. D. Lora-Clavijo, and A. Cruz-Osorio, Anisotropic quark stars with an interact- ing quark equation of state, Phys. Rev. D100, 103006 (2019), arXiv:1903.03047 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [16] R. F. Sawyer, Condensedπ − phase in neutron-star mat- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 382 (1972) on Pith
  17. [17] V. Canuto, Equation of state at ultrahigh densities. Part 2., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys13, 335 (1975) on Pith
  18. [18] H. Heiselberg and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Phases of dense 13 matter in neutron stars, Phys. Rep.328, 237 (2000), arXiv:nucl-th/9902033 [nucl-th] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [19] R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity, Astrophys. J.188, 657 (1974) on Pith
  20. [20] L. Herrera and N. O. Santos, Local anisotropy in self- gravitating systems, Phys. Rep.286, 53 (1997) on Pith
show 21 more
  1. [21] L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and F. D. Lora-Clavijo, Rotating neutron stars: Anisotropy model comparison, Phys. Rev. D111, 103005 (2025), arXiv:2504.16305 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  2. [22] L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and F. D. Lora- Clavijo, Realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Pressure ef- fects, Phys. Rev. D109, 043025 (2024), arXiv:2401.10311 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [23] L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, F. D. Lora- Clavijo, and J. F. Rodriguez, Stability of anisotropic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D113, 023009 (2026), arXiv:2512.19825 [gr-qc] on PitharXiv
  4. [24] J. M. Z. Pretel, Moment of inertia of slowly rotating anisotropic neutron stars in f(R,T) gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A37, 2250188 (2022), arXiv:2301.02881 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [25] K. Yagi and N. Yunes, I-Love-Q relations: from compact stars to black holes, Classical and Quantum Gravity33, 095005 (2016), arXiv:1601.02171 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [26] D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Nonradial oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in the cowling approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. D85, 124023 (2012) on Pith
  7. [27] J. F. Rodriguez-Ruiz, L. M. Becerra, and F. D. Lora- Clavijo, Nonradial oscillations of realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Axial modes, Phys. Rev. D114, 024028 (2026), arXiv:2605.06418 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [28] K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, W-modes - A new fam- ily of normal modes of pulsating relativistic stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.255, 119 (1992) on Pith
  9. [29] S. Mondal and M. Bagchi, f-mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 123011 (2024), arXiv:2309.00439 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [30] S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, V. Guedes, and K. Yagi, Nonradial instabilities in anisotropic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083020 (2024), arXiv:2405.04653 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [31] J. Yu, V. Guedes, S. Y. Lau, S. Ajith, and K. Yagi, Spacetime quasinormal mode oscillations of anisotropic neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D114, 044052 (2026), arXiv:2601.06962 [gr-qc] on PitharXiv
  12. [32] D. Horvat, S. Iliji´ c, and A. Marunovi´ c, Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with a quasi-local equa- tion of state, Class. Quantum Gravity28, 025009 (2011), arXiv:1010.0878 [gr-qc] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [33] T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Hard- ing, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] M. C. Miller and et. al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Ra- dius from NICER Data and Implications for the Prop- erties of Neutron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] T. E. Riley and et. al., A NICER View of the Mas- sive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Tim- ing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [36] M. C. Miller and e. ., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [37] R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object, Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [38] V. Guedes, S. Ajith, S. Y. Lau, and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave constraints on neutron-star pressure anisotropy via universal relations, Phys. Rev. D113, 043025 (2026), arXiv:2510.26042 [astro-ph.HE] on PitharXiv
  19. [39] T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957) on Pith
  20. [40] M. F. O’Boyle, C. Markakis, N. Stergioulas, and J. S. Read, Parametrized equation of state for neutron star matter with continuous sound speed, Phys. Rev. D102, 083027 (2020), arXiv:2008.03342 [astro-ph.HE] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  21. [41] J.-L. L¨ u and W.-M. Suen, Determining the long living quasi-normal modes of relativistic stars, Chinese Physics B20, 040401 (2011) on Pith

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment