Pith.

High Energy Physics - Theory · arXiv:2609.13137 v1 · submitted 11 Sep 2026 · 126 references

Mixed state entanglement measures for open string geometry

Souvik Paul, Anirban Roy Chowdhury, Sunandan Gangopadhyay

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“In the gauge/gravity framework flavor degrees of freedom are introduced to the gauge theory side through the insertion of probe flavor D branes in the supergravity background.”

more of the abstract

Scalar, vector or spinor fluctuations on theses flavor branes perceive neither the background supergravity metric nor the worldvolume-induced metric of the flavor branes. Indeed, they follow an effective metric called the open string metric (OSM). Through a proper choice of worldvolume gauge fields, one can induce a horizon structure in these OSMs. Studying holographic information-theoretic quantities in these kinds of geometries is equivalent to studying information-theoretic quantities in the flavor sector on the gauge theory side. In this article, we have studied various information-theoretic measures like mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section and entanglement negativity for an open string geometry. All the calculations are done by considering strip-like parallel boundary subsystems for three- and four-dimensional OSMs. We have also measured the change in these mixed-state information-theoretic quantities from the relevant quantities in the pure AdS geometry due to the application of a background electric field.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4-flash · 14 Sep 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

Holds up, with conditions. Systematic computation of mixed-state entanglement measures for open string metrics, but perturbative truncation errors may affect some quantitative predictions for critical separations. This line is wrong

2 major objections · 5 minor

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 126 references say.

The paper says, at §3.1, §4.1, §5.1.2

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 1 of 2 · major

The perturbative expansion in the electric field E is truncated at O(E^2) for the 2+1-dimensional OSM. The effective expansion parameter for quantities involving subsystem length l is E l^2; for the range used in Fig.5 and Fig.7 (E up to 0.2, l=2), E l^2 reaches 0.8.

more of objection 1

The paper does not discuss the radius of convergence of the series or provide an estimate of the truncation error. Since the determination of the critical separation d_c in Eq.(4.11) involves delicate cancellations, quantitative predictions may be sensitive to higher-order terms. The authors should either restrict the parameter range to ensure smallness of the expansion parameter, estimate the magnitude of the next-order term, or justify that the truncation does not affect the physical conclusions.

This objection may describe the copy Pith gave the reviewer, not the paper.

The paper says, at §3.2, §4.2, §5.2.2

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 2 of 2 · major

For the 3+1-dimensional OSM, the expansion is carried to O(E^4) with expansion parameter E^2 z_*^4. For l=2 and E=0.2, E^2 z_*^4 ≈ 0.31 (with z_* ≈1.67), so the O(E^4) term contributes significantly. The inverted series Eq.(3.36) for the turning point is given only to O(E^4) without estimation of the O(E^6) remainder.

more of objection 2

The authors should comment on the regime of validity of the expansion for the parameter values used in the figures and check that including the next order does not qualitatively change the results for the critical separation or the negativity persistence.

5 minor objections

The paper says, at §1 (Introduction)

Pith says: minor objection 1 of 5

There is a repeated paragraph: 'In this paper, we holographically compute...' appears nearly verbatim twice in the introduction (page 5). Please remove the duplication.

The paper says, at §3.1, Eq.(3.17)

Pith says: minor objection 2 of 5

The series expansion for l/2 in terms of z_t lists coefficients (1, E/2, 17E^2/120, …). It would be helpful to provide a brief derivation or reference to [51] for this expansion, as the coefficients are not obvious from the integral alone.

show 3 more

The paper says, at Figures 5–8

Pith says: minor objection 3 of 5

The axis labels and legends are legible, but the figures would benefit from larger font sizes for the tick labels in the printed version. Consider increasing font sizes or using vector graphics.

The paper says, at General readability

Pith says: minor objection 4 of 5

Several typos exist: 'defination' should be 'definition' (page 3, near Eq.(1.6)); 'metrices' should be 'metrics' (page 6, middle); 'agagin' should be 'again' (page 31, conclusion). A careful proofread is recommended.

The paper says, at Appendix A, Eq.(A.2)

Pith says: minor objection 5 of 5

In Eq.(A.2) the notation '1/z_h^2' is introduced as the horizon contribution; it is consistent with the main text but a brief remark that z_h = 1/√E would help the reader.

What would settle it

For l=2, E=0.07 and E=0.2, solve the exact turning point equation (3.12) numerically (without series expansion) and recompute the mutual information I(A:B) from eq.(4.1) and the EWCS from eq.(4.7) using the exact metric (3.2) over a range of d from 0 to 1.5. Compare the resulting critical separation d_c to the perturbative value from eq.(4.11). If the relative difference exceeds 5% for E=0.07 or 15% for E=0.2, the perturbative truncation is unreliable and the quantitative conclusions require revision.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

4 readings by deepseek-v4-flash · 14 Sep 2026

  1. Reader holds up, with conditions confidence high
  2. Skeptic partly agrees 49 s · 31,319 tokens read, 5,127 written
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 12 s · 32,199 tokens read, 1,152 written
  4. Referee major revision: 2 major objections, 5 minor 26 s · 31,686 tokens read, 2,577 written

Not run on this paper: the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

This paper computes holographic mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section, and entanglement negativity for open string metrics in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions. It extends previous work that only studied holographic entanglement entropy and complexity for these backgrounds. The calculations are thorough, follow standard holographic prescriptions, and the presentation is clear. The qualitative results—that the electric field reduces the critical separation for the entanglement wedge to become disconnected, and that negativity survives beyond the point where mutual information vanishes—are interesting and likely correct. Credit is due for the careful perturbative expansions up to O(E2) in 2+1 d and O(E4) in 3+1 d, and for the explicit expressions and figures.

The main soft spot is the perturbative expansion itself. The stress-test note is right: for the 2+1 case, the effective expansion parameter is E l2. With l=2 and E=0.2, this is 0.8. The series is truncated at second order with no discussion of the radius of convergence or estimate of the remainder. Since the critical separation is determined by a cancellation that could be sensitive to higher-order corrections, the quantitative predictions for that critical separation carry some uncertainty. This is an addressable issue—not a fatal flaw—but it should be acknowledged and preferably mitigated with a convergence estimate or a higher-order check. For the 3+1 case, the truncation is at O(E4), and the expansion parameter E l2 is smaller for the plotted values, so the concern is milder. The reliance on the holographic negativity proposal is standard; a critical assessment would be a bonus but is not required.

Overall, this is a solid, incremental contribution within the holography subfield. The qualitative conclusions are robust; the quantitative claims need a bit more care. I would bring it to a reading group focused on holographic entanglement. I would not cite it for precise numbers without seeing the perturbative validation, but the general framework and qualitative trends are useful. It deserves a serious referee, with the expectation that the authors address the perturbative convergence regime, especially for the 2+1 case.

The strongest objection

The central quantitative predictions for the 2+1 case rely on a perturbative expansion in E truncated at O(E^2). The effective expansion parameter is E l^2; for l=2 and E=0.07 (Fig.5a) this is 0.28, and for E=0.2 (Fig.7a) it is 0.8. The turning point series (3.18) gives a correction of roughly -10% at O(E) and +2.4% at O(E^2) relative to the leading term l/2, with no estimate of the remainder. The mutual information (4.2) and EWCS (4.8) expressions are derived from this series; their use in eq.(4.11) to determine the critical separation involves delicate cancellations. A modest truncation error could significantly alter the predicted critical distance. The qualitative claim that negativity persists is more robust, but the quantitative deviations from pure AdS shown in Fig.7a may be unreliable for E=0.2. The paper does not discuss the radius of convergence or check higher-order terms.

The reader identified perturbative validity as the weakest assumption. I agree but sharpen the concern: the problem is most acute in the (2+1)-dimensional case, where the expansion parameter E l^2 reaches 0.8 (for l=2, E=0.2) and only O(E^2) terms are kept. No error bound or convergence test is provided. The (3+1)-dimensional case is less concerning because the expansion involves E^2 z_*^4 which for the same parameters is much smaller (~0.02). The proposed numerical check would directly test whether the truncation error is acceptable. Since the reader already gave a CONDITIONAL verdict, the stress-test does not change the verdict but reinforces the condition with a concrete test. I disagree with part of the reader's weakest assumption: the probe limit N_f<<N_c and the specific gauge field choice are standard, not load-bearing concerns; the perturbative truncation is the key issue.

The referee's report

If the results hold, the paper provides the first systematic holographic study of mixed-state entanglement measures for open string geometries, which are dual to the flavor sector of gauge theories. The finding that entanglement negativity remains non-zero beyond the critical separation where mutual information and EWCS vanish is interesting and quantitatively illustrated. The technical derivations follow standard holographic prescriptions and are clearly presented.

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

This paper computes three mixed-state entanglement measures—mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section, and entanglement negativity—for open string metrics (OSMs) in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions, using holography. The OSMs describe effective geometries for fluctuations on flavor D-branes; turning on a worldvolume electric field induces a horizon. The central result is that the electric field reduces the critical separation between two parallel boundary subsystems at which the entanglement wedge becomes disconnected (where mutual information and EWCS vanish). Remarkably, entanglement negativity does not vanish at this critical separation, remaining non-zero for all finite separations studied, which suggests it is a more sensitive probe of mixed-state entanglement in the flavor sector. All calculations are perturbative in the electric field, extending earlier work on holographic entanglement entropy in these geometries.

What carries the argument. The key object is the open string metric (OSM), an effective metric perceived by scalar, vector, and spinor fluctuations on flavor D-branes embedded in a supergravity background. The OSM acquires a horizon when a worldvolume gauge field is turned on (e.g., an electric field along a spatial direction). Using the Ryu-Takayanagi formula for holographic entanglement entropy on this deformed geometry, the paper derives perturbative expressions for the turning point z_t (or z_*) in terms of the boundary subsystem length l, and then computes mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section, and entanglement negativity by combining appropriate RT surfaces.

Core claim. The paper establishes that for open string metrics with a horizon induced by a worldvolume electric field, the critical separation distance d_c between two strip-like subsystems—at which the holographic mutual information and entanglement wedge cross-section drop to zero—decreases as the electric field strength increases. Furthermore, the holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint subsystems does not vanish at any finite separation, in contrast to the mutual information and EWCS, implying that negativity captures residual mixed-state entanglement that the other measures miss. This behavior is demonstrated analytically via perturbative expansions in the electric field for both (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensional OSMs, and the inequality E_W ≥ I/2 is shown to hold throughout.

The premise it rests on. The paper assumes that the perturbative expansion in the electric field E is valid for the range of parameters used (E up to 0.2, subsystem lengths up to 2, so maximum E*$l^{2}$ up to 0.8), and does not check higher-order terms or the radius of convergence, so quantitative predictions (e.g., exact critical separation) may be sensitive to truncation errors.

If the paper is right (Pith's inferences, not the authors')

The reduction of critical separation with electric field implies that a stronger background field makes the bipartite entanglement between subsystems more fragile, potentially affecting quantum information processing in holographic duals of non-equilibrium steady states.

The persistence of entanglement negativity beyond the vanishing of mutual information and EWCS suggests that negativity is a more robust order parameter for mixed-state entanglement in flavored gauge theories, and may reveal quantum correlations that are hidden by classical correlations.

The perturbative framework can be systematically extended to higher orders in the electric field to check the convergence of the series and to compute corrections to the critical separation with greater precision.

The results provide explicit benchmark for future non-perturbative or numerical studies of holographic entanglement measures in probe brane systems.

The decrease of critical separation with electric field mirrors the effect of increasing temperature in thermal holographic systems; this suggests an analogy between the electric-field-induced horizon and thermal effects, which could be tested by comparing with a thermal bath at appropriate effective temperature.

The fact that entanglement negativity remains non-zero while mutual information vanishes may indicate that the mixed state retains some distillable entanglement even when the total correlations (mutual information) become purely classical. This could be confirmed by computing the entanglement of purification in the same geometry.

The UV-finite nature of negativity for disjoint equal-length subsystems in both dimensions hints at a universal property: the negativity is sensitive to long-range quantum correlations that are not captured by the area-law divergent terms, making it a cleaner diagnostic for non-perturbative physics in the flavor sector.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper · Review history (2 versions)

The paper

Abstract

In the gauge/gravity framework flavor degrees of freedom are introduced to the gauge theory side through the insertion of probe flavor D branes in the supergravity background. Scalar, vector or spinor fluctuations on theses flavor branes perceive neither the background supergravity metric nor the worldvolume-induced metric of the flavor branes. Indeed, they follow an effective metric called the open string metric (OSM). Through a proper choice of worldvolume gauge fields, one can induce a horizon structure in these OSMs. Studying holographic information-theoretic quantities in these kinds of geometries is equivalent to studying information-theoretic quantities in the flavor sector on the gauge theory side. In this article, we have studied various information-theoretic measures like mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section and entanglement negativity for an open string geometry. All the calculations are done by considering strip-like parallel boundary subsystems for three- and four-dimensional OSMs. We have also measured the change in these mixed-state information-theoretic quantities from the relevant quantities in the pure AdS geometry due to the application of a background electric field.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.74

“We have also measured the change in these mixed-state information-theoretic quantities from the relevant quantities in the pure AdS geometry due to the application of a background electric field.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.79 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.77 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In the gauge/gravity framework flavor degrees of freedom are introduced to the gauge theory side through the insertion of probe flavor $D$ branes in the supergravity background. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
Scalar, vector or spinor fluctuations on theses flavor branes perceive neither the background supergravity metric nor the worldvolume-induced metric of the flavor branes. background 0.97 0.11 0.03 asserted 1.00
Indeed, they follow an effective metric called the open string metric (OSM). background 1.00 0.10 0.04 asserted 1.00
Through a proper choice of worldvolume gauge fields, one can induce a horizon structure in these OSMs. background 0.64 0.15 0.04 hedged possibility 0.73
Studying holographic information-theoretic quantities in these kinds of geometries is equivalent to studying information-theoretic quantities in the flavor sector on the gauge theory side. background 0.55 0.08 0.10 asserted 1.00
In this article, we have studied various information-theoretic measures like mutual information, entanglement wedge cross-section and entanglement negativity for an open string geometry. contribution 1.00 0.96 0.12 asserted 1.00
All the calculations are done by considering strip-like parallel boundary subsystems for three- and four-dimensional OSMs. method 0.99 0.93 0.04 asserted 1.00
We have also measured the change in these mixed-state information-theoretic quantities from the relevant quantities in the pure AdS geometry due to the application of a background electric field. result 0.74 0.95 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.87

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,244 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

References (126)
  1. [1] M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring theory: volume 1, Introduction, Cambridge university press (2012) on Pith
  2. [2] M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring theory: volume 2, loop amplitudes, anomalies and phenomenology, Cambridge university press (2012). – 31 – on Pith
  3. [3] J. Polchinski and J.A. Harvey,String theory, 1999 on Pith
  4. [4] B. Zwiebach,A first course in string theory, Cambridge university press (2004) on Pith
  5. [5] D. Lüst and S. Theisen,Lectures on string theory, Springer (1989) on Pith
  6. [6] J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [7] S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [8] E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [9] O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [10] M. Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, vol. 903 (2015), 10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7, [1409.3575] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [11] H. Nastase,Introduction to AdS-CFT,0712.0689 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [12] S. Sachdev,Condensed Matter and AdS/CFT,Lect. Notes Phys.828(2011) 273 [1002.2947] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [13] E. Keski-Vakkuri and P. Kraus,Quantum Hall Effect in AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2008) 130 [0805.4643] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [14] S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz,Building a Holographic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 031601 [0803.3295] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [15] S.-S. Lee,A Non-Fermi Liquid from a Charged Black Hole: A Critical Fermi Ball,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 086006 [0809.3402] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [16] R.-G. Cai, H.-F. Li and H.-Q. Zhang,Analytical Studies on Holographic Insulator/Superconductor Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 126007 [1103.5568] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [17] S. Gangopadhyay and D. Roychowdhury,Analytic study of properties of holographic superconductors in Born-Infeld electrodynamics,JHEP05(2012) 002 [1201.6520] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [18] G. Koutsoumbas, E. Papantonopoulos and G. Siopsis,Exact Gravity Dual of a Gapless Superconductor,JHEP07(2009) 026 [0902.0733] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [19] O. Bergman, N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert,Quantum Hall Effect in a Holographic Model,JHEP10(2010) 063 [1003.4965] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [20] S. Gangopadhyay and D. Roychowdhury,Analytic study of properties of holographic p-wave superconductors,JHEP08(2012) 104 [1207.5605] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
show 80 more
  1. [21] S. Paul and S. Gangopadhyay,Noncommutative p-wave holographic superconductors,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 185016 [2502.08275] on PitharXiv
  2. [22] C. Csaki, M. Reece and J. Terning,The AdS/QCD Correspondence: Still Undelivered, JHEP05(2009) 067 [0811.3001] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [23] S.J. Brodsky and G.F. de Teramond,Light-Front Dynamics and AdS/QCD Correspondence: Gravitational Form Factors of Composite Hadrons,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 025032 [0804.0452]. – 32 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [24] J. Erlich, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 261602 [hep-ph/0501128] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [25] A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005 [hep-ph/0602229] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [26] M. Kruczenski, L.A. Pando Zayas, J. Sonnenschein and D. Vaman,Regge trajectories for mesons in the holographic dual of large-N(c) QCD,JHEP06(2005) 046 [hep-th/0410035] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [27] O. Aharony,The NonAdS / nonCFT correspondence, or three different paths to QCD, in NATO Advanced Study Institute and EC Summer School on Progress in String, Field and Particle Theory, pp. 3–24, 12, 2002 [hep-th/0212193] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [28] D. Bak,Dual of big-bang and big-crunch,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 026003 [hep-th/0603080] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [29] C. Rovelli and T. Thiemann,The Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 1009 [gr-qc/9705059] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [30] N. Engelhardt and G.T. Horowitz,Holographic Consequences of a No Transmission Principle,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 026005 [1509.07509] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [31] S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,AdS / CFT correspondence in cosmology,Phys. Lett. B494 (2000) 135 [hep-th/0008160] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [32] S. Antonini and B. Swingle,Cosmology at the end of the world,Nature Phys.16(2020) 881 [1907.06667] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [33] B. Craps, T. Hertog and N. Turok,On the Quantum Resolution of Cosmological Singularities using AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 043513 [0712.4180] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] S. Paul, G. Guin and S. Gangopadhyay,Holographic entanglement entropy and complexity for the cosmological braneworld model,JHEP08(2025) 164 [2505.11553] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Holography for Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 021301 [0907.5542] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [36] T. Banks and W. Fischler,An Holographic cosmology,hep-th/0111142 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [37] P. Brax and C. van de Bruck,Cosmology and brane worlds: A Review,Class. Quant. Grav. 20(2003) R201 [hep-th/0303095] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [38] A. Karch and E. Katz,Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,JHEP06(2002) 043 [hep-th/0205236] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [39] A. Karch and A. O’Bannon,Metallic AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2007) 024 [0705.3870] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [40] O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman and H. Ooguri,Holography and defect conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025009 [hep-th/0111135] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  21. [41] J. Polchinski,Dirichlet Branes and Ramond-Ramond charges,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 4724 [hep-th/9510017] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  22. [42] M. Berkooz, M.R. Douglas and R.G. Leigh,Branes intersecting at angles,Nucl. Phys. B 480(1996) 265 [hep-th/9606139] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  23. [43] J.P. Gauntlett,Intersecting branes, inAPCTP Winter School on Dualities of Gauge and String Theories, pp. 146–193, 5, 1997, DOI [hep-th/9705011] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  24. [44] D. Lust,Intersecting brane worlds: A Path to the standard model?,Class. Quant. Grav.21 (2004) S1399 [hep-th/0401156]. – 33 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  25. [45] G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L.E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan and A.M. Uranga,Intersecting brane worlds,JHEP02(2001) 047 [hep-ph/0011132] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  26. [46] J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall,Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review,Eur. Phys. J. A35(2008) 81 [0711.4467] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  27. [47] M. Kruczenski, D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and D.J. Winters,Meson spectroscopy in AdS / CFT with flavor,JHEP07(2003) 049 [hep-th/0304032] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  28. [48] J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N.J. Evans, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch,Chiral symmetry breaking and pions in nonsupersymmetric gauge / gravity duals,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 066007 [hep-th/0306018] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  29. [49] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  30. [50] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  31. [51] A. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharya and S. Maulik,HEE and HSC for flavors: perturbative structure in open string geometries,JHEP07(2021) 212 [2008.02705] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  32. [52] A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and S. Kundu,Emergent Horizons and Causal Structures in Holography,JHEP09(2016) 166 [1605.07368] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  33. [53] K. Kontoudi and G. Policastro,Flavor corrections to the entanglement entropy,JHEP01 (2014) 043 [1310.4549] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  34. [54] A. Karch and C.F. Uhlemann,Generalized gravitational entropy of probe branes: flavor entanglement holographically,JHEP05(2014) 017 [1402.4497] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  35. [55] U. Kol, C. Nunez, D. Schofield, J. Sonnenschein and M. Warschawski,Confinement, Phase Transitions and non-Locality in the Entanglement Entropy,JHEP06(2014) 005 [1403.2721] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  36. [56] G. Georgiou and D. Zoakos,Entanglement entropy of the Klebanov-Strassler model with dynamical flavors,JHEP07(2015) 003 [1505.01453] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  37. [57] P.A.R. Jones and M. Taylor,Entanglement entropy and differential entropy for massive flavors,JHEP08(2015) 014 [1505.07697] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  38. [58] V. Vaganov,Holographic entanglement entropy for massive flavours in dS4,JHEP03 (2016) 172 [1512.07902] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  39. [59] S.P. Kumar and D. Silvani,Entanglement of heavy quark impurities and generalized gravitational entropy,JHEP01(2018) 052 [1711.01554] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  40. [60] N. Jokela, J. Kastikainen, J.M. Penín and H. Ruotsalainen,Flavors of entanglement,JHEP 07(2024) 270 [2401.07905] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  41. [61] H.-C. Chang and A. Karch,Entanglement Entropy for Probe Branes,JHEP01(2014) 180 [1307.5325] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  42. [62] J. Von Neumann,Mathematische grundlagen der quantenmechanik, vol. 38, Springer-Verlag (2013) on Pith
  43. [63] M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge university press (2010) on Pith
  44. [64] S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199. – 34 – on Pith
  45. [65] S.W. Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 2460 on Pith
  46. [66] G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205 [1911.11977] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  47. [67] G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002 [1905.08255] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  48. [68] A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149 [1908.10996] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  49. [69] T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger,Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity, JHEP07(2020) 022 [2004.13857] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  50. [70] X. Wang, R. Li and J. Wang,Page curves for a family of exactly solvable evaporating black holes,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 126026 [2104.00224] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  51. [71] A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos,Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys.9(2020) 001 [1911.09666] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  52. [72] Y. Ling, Y. Liu and Z.-Y. Xian,Island in Charged Black Holes,JHEP03(2021) 251 [2010.00037] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  53. [73] M. Alishahiha, A. Faraji Astaneh and A. Naseh,Island in the presence of higher derivative terms,JHEP02(2021) 035 [2005.08715] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  54. [74] A. Saha, S. Gangopadhyay and J.P. Saha,Mutual information, islands in black holes and the Page curve,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 476 [2109.02996] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  55. [75] A. Roy Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Role of mutual information in the Page curve,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 086019 [2207.13029] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  56. [76] A. Roy Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Mutual information of subsystems and the Page curve for the Schwarzschild–de Sitter black hole,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026003 [2303.14062] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  57. [77] A. Roy Chowdhury, S. Paul and S. Gangopadhyay,New insights on mutual information in the island approach to the Page curve,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 1031 [2607.04706] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  58. [78] Y.-Y. Cheng and J.-R. Sun,Island of an acoustic black hole in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 064030 [2512.09460] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  59. [79] M.-H. Yu and X.-H. Ge,Islands in Kerr–Newman black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 276 [2510.24006] on PitharXiv
  60. [80] M.M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, M.B. Hastings and J.I. Cirac,Area Laws in Quantum Systems: Mutual Information and Correlations,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 070502 [0704.3906] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  61. [81] B.M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D.W. Leung and D.P. DiVincenzo,The entanglement of purification,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 4286 [quant-ph/0202044] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  62. [82] M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki,Mixed state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature?,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5239 [quant-ph/9801069] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  63. [83] G. Vidal and R.F. Werner,Computable measure of entanglement,Phys. Rev. A65(2002) 032314 [quant-ph/0102117]. – 35 – on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  64. [84] G. Vidal,On the characterization of entanglement,J. Mod. Opt.47(2000) 355 [quant-ph/9807077] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  65. [85] N. Seiberg and E. Witten,String theory and noncommutative geometry,JHEP09(1999) 032 [hep-th/9908142] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  66. [86] A. Kundu and S. Kundu,Steady-state Physics, Effective Temperature Dynamics in Holography,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 046004 [1307.6607] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  67. [87] A. Kundu,Effective Temperature in Steady-state Dynamics from Holography,JHEP09 (2015) 042 [1507.00818] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  68. [88] A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and S. Kundu,Flavour Fields in Steady State: Stress Tensor and Free Energy,JHEP02(2016) 102 [1512.05472] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  69. [89] V.P. Akulov and D.V. Volkov,Goldstone fields with spin 1/2,Theor. Math. Phys.18(1974) 28 on Pith
  70. [90] T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Phys.14(2018) 573 [1708.09393] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  71. [91] P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M.G. Halbasch, M.P. Zaletel and B. Swingle,Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography,JHEP01(2018) 098 [1709.07424] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  72. [92] N. Jokela and A. Pönni,Notes on entanglement wedge cross sections,JHEP07(2019) 087 [1904.09582] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  73. [93] K. Babaei Velni, M.R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M.H. Vahidinia,Some Aspects of Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section,JHEP05(2019) 200 [1903.08490] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  74. [94] D. Basu, A. Chandra, V. Raj and G. Sengupta,Entanglement wedge in flat holography and entanglement negativity,SciPost Phys. Core5(2022) 013 [2106.14896] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  75. [95] M. Sahraei, M.J. Vasli, M.R.M. Mozaffar and K.B. Velni,Entanglement wedge cross section in holographic excited states,JHEP08(2021) 038 [2105.12476] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  76. [96] A.R. Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Entanglement wedge cross-section for noncommutative Yang-Mills theory,JHEP02(2022) 192 [2106.04562] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  77. [97] A. Roy Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Mixed state entanglement measures for the dipole deformed supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory,Annals Phys.460(2024) 169565 [2307.13712] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  78. [98] P. Liu, C. Niu, Z.-J. Shi and C.-Y. Zhang,Entanglement wedge minimum cross-section in holographic massive gravity theory,JHEP08(2021) 113 [2104.08070] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  79. [99] A. Chowdhury Roy, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Mixed state information theoretic measures in boosted black brane,Annals Phys.452(2023) 169270 [2204.08012] on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  80. [100] S. Paul, A. Roy Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay,Information theoretic measures for Lifshitz system,JHEP10(2024) 033 [2408.03670] on PithPith's reviewarXiv

The first 100 of 126 references are listed here. All of them are in this paper's citation record.

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Density-driven reversal of flavour-entanglement anisotropy in the D3-D7 holographic conductor hep-th · Sep 2026

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment