Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

A holographic Schwinger pair carries nonlocal magic for boundary spacetime dimension d>2, computed from the probe-string contribution to the entanglement capacity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 14:52 UTC pith:32HAGV2W

load-bearing objection A clean probe-action computation of the entanglement capacity for a holographic Schwinger pair, with a closed-form C_E that checks out; but the leap to 'the pair carries nonlocal magic' outruns the cited lemma because the excess capacity is not a density-matrix capacity. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.04210 v2 pith:32HAGV2W submitted 2026-05-05 hep-th gr-qchep-phnucl-thquant-ph

Nonlocal Nonstabilizerness from Holographic Schwinger Pair Production

Sebastian Grieninger This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qchep-phnucl-thquant-ph
keywords nonlocal magicSchwinger pair productionholographycapacity of entanglementrefined Rényi entropyentanglement spectrumtopological black holesspherical entangling region
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that a quark–antiquark pair pulled out of the vacuum by a strong chromoelectric field—though entangled as a color singlet and structurally similar to a Bell pair—carries nonlocal magic, a quantum resource beyond entanglement that cannot be removed by local operations. Using holography, the author computes the refined Rényi entropy for a spherical region containing one member of the pair and finds the entanglement spectrum is not flat when the boundary spacetime dimension is larger than two. By an information-theoretic faithfulness lemma, a non-flat spectrum is equivalent to nonzero nonlocal magic, so the pair must carry it. The calculation gives a closed-form entanglement capacity C_E = sqrt(lambda)(d-2)/(d-1)^3 that is independent of the pair's acceleration, meaning the magic is intrinsic to the gauge-theory state rather than a thermal artifact of the Rindler horizon. If correct, this makes Schwinger pair creation a concrete, analytically controlled example of dynamical complexity generation in a far-from-equilibrium gauge theory.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the entanglement capacity C_E of a spherical region containing one member of a holographic Schwinger pair is C_E = sqrt(lambda)(d-2)/(d-1)^3, which is strictly positive for d>2 and vanishes for d=2. Since C_E is the variance of the modular Hamiltonian spectrum, and since that variance is zero if and only if the entanglement spectrum is flat if and only if nonlocal magic vanishes, the positivity of C_E for d>2 is taken as proof that the pair carries nonlocal magic. The argument runs through the replica construction: the probe string action is linear in the n-dependent topological black hole horizon position, and the curvature of the hyperbolic entangling surface mak

What carries the argument

The central object is the n-dependent topological black hole horizon position ζ_h(n), which fixes the probe string action I(n) = -sqrt(lambda) ζ_h(n) up to an n-independent constant. The refined Rényi entropy S̃_n = n^2 ∂_n I(n) is identified with the thermal entropy of the probe string at temperature 1/(2πn), and its derivative at n=1 is the entanglement capacity C_E, i.e. the variance of the modular Hamiltonian spectrum. The faithfulness lemma—C_E = 0 iff the spectrum is flat iff nonlocal magic vanishes—connects this spectral variance to nonlocal magic purely information-theoretically. What does the work is the fact that for d>2 the topological black hole function f_n(ζ) acquires a curvatu

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the refined Rényi slope computed from a single probe string in the n-th topological black hole is exactly the variance of the pair's contribution to the entanglement spectrum, with no cross-terms from the O(N^2) vacuum and no correction from the two-sided wormhole worldsheet.

What would settle it

Compute the full replica partition function including both endpoints of the worldsheet wormhole rather than the single-string reduction; if the resulting ∂_n S̃_n at n=1 vanishes or changes sign for d>2, the claim that the pair carries nonlocal magic would be refuted. A complementary check is to measure the entanglement spectrum variance of a region containing one member of a pair in a 2+1D lattice gauge theory at strong coupling: a flat spectrum would contradict C_E > 0.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Schwinger pair production at strong coupling dynamically generates nonlocal magic in dimensions d>2, not merely entanglement, so particle-production events leave a specific spectral fingerprint on the reduced state of a region containing one part of the pair.
  • The nonlocal magic is independent of the acceleration and hence of the Unruh temperature, so it encodes intrinsic structure of the pair's quantum state rather than thermal effects at the Rindler horizon.
  • The ratio C_E/S_EE = (d-2)/(d-1)^2 depends only on spacetime dimension, offering a universal, coupling-independent observable for the shape of the entanglement spectrum of a produced pair.
  • In d=2 the n-deformed geometry is locally equivalent to the undeformed one and C_E vanishes at leading order, so pair production in a 1+1-dimensional gauge theory would not generate nonlocal magic through this mechanism, up to subleading 1/N or finite-coupling corrections.
  • Because the capacity can be extracted from the probe free energy, the calculation extends to other probe-brane, defect, and flavor sectors in holography without explicitly constructing the backreacted geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the excess-spectrum interpretation survives, a direct lattice test is to measure the variance of the Rényi spectrum for a region containing one member of a produced pair in 2+1D lattice gauge theory; a nonzero variance at strong coupling would match the holographic prediction, while a flat spectrum would falsify it.
  • The paper leaves open whether the O(N^2) vacuum's own nonlocal magic interferes with the pair's O(sqrt(lambda)) contribution; computing the total capacity including cross-terms could reveal constructive or destructive interference between the vacuum and the pair.
  • The d=2 vanishing result hints at a dimensional threshold: nonlocal magic from pair creation may require the entangling surface to have nontrivial curvature, so comparing spherical versus planar (half-space) bipartitions in the same theory would be a valuable extension.
  • The author's framework could be applied to pulsed or time-dependent electric fields, such as Sauter pulses, to predict when nonlocal magic switches on during the pulse, connecting directly to quantum-simulation experiments of string breaking.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes a holographic probe-string contribution to the refined Rényi entropy for a spherical entangling region in the presence of a Schwinger pair, using the CHM map and topological black holes. The main result is C_E = sqrt(lambda)(d-2)/(d-1)^3 (Eqs. 20 and 22), which is positive for d>2 and vanishes for BTZ. Interpreting C_E as the capacity of entanglement and invoking Lemma 1 of Ref. [17] (Eq. 12), the paper concludes that the produced color-singlet quark–antiquark pair carries nonlocal magic. The computation itself is transparent and parameter-free, but the central inference requires identifying the O(sqrt(lambda)) excess refined Rényi slope with the capacity of a genuine reduced density matrix; this identification is not established.

Significance. If the central inference is valid, this is a clean and nontrivial example of complexity generation in a far-from-equilibrium holographic process. The derivation has no free parameters: C_E follows by direct differentiation of the topological-black-hole horizon position, with concrete numbers C_E = 2 sqrt(lambda)/27 in d=4 and C_E = 0 in d=2. It also uses an external, published information-theoretic lemma rather than a self-imported criterion. The independence of the result from the acceleration a = E/M is a sharp, falsifiable prediction. However, the significance is conditional on whether the computed excess capacity is actually a witness for the pair's nonlocal magic; the manuscript does not yet supply the needed decomposition of the reduced density matrix.

major comments (2)
  1. [§II.D footnote 1, Eq. (20), Appendix C.3] The quantity whose positivity is established is an excess capacity, not the capacity C_E(rho_A) to which Lemma 1 of Ref. [17] applies. For the total state rho_A = rho_vac + delta_rho, the variance of -log rho_A is not the sum of the vacuum variance and the probe variance unless cross-terms between the vacuum and probe modular Hamiltonians vanish. The footnote in §II.D states that the vacuum contribution is 'independent of the produced pair,' but that is a statement about the vacuum saddle, not about the cross-terms. Appendix C.3 proves that the cross-term between the bulk action and the probe backreaction vanishes on-shell (Eq. C8), but that is a statement about the on-shell action, not about Var(-log rho_A). Since the vacuum already has C_E/S_EE = 1 (§II.D, Refs. [86,87]), positivity of the total capacity is trivial; what must be shown is that the excess capacity itself is the capacity
  2. [Appendix B.2 and §II.A] The physical object is a two-sided worldsheet wormhole (Eqs. 4–7) with endpoints accelerating into two Rindler wedges. The computation, however, uses a single radial probe string at fixed u in H^{d-1} spanning zeta_h(n) to zeta_brane (Eqs. B4–B7). The reduction of the two-endpoint Hartle–Hawking worldsheet to this single radial string is asserted rather than derived. If the correct embedding has two branches or nontrivial u-dependence, the n-dependence of the on-shell action need not be simply -sqrt(lambda) zeta_h(n), and Eq. (20) would not be the pair's contribution to the region-A spectrum. Please derive this reduction from the Semenoff–Zarembo solution under the CHM map, or otherwise prove that the single-radial-string configuration captures the relevant replica geometry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (14)] Notation is inconsistent: the refined Rényi entropy is written as 'e^{S_n}' and also as 'eSn'; it should be \tilde S_n throughout. The preceding display for S_A^(n) also has a malformed bracket.
  2. [§II.D footnote 1] The statement that all entropies below are excess contributions relative to the vacuum is load-bearing for the interpretation but appears only in a footnote. It should be promoted to the main text and discussed explicitly.
  3. [Appendix B.2] The sentence 'The probe string sits at a fixed point on H^{d-1} (for example u=0, the quark location)' is confusing, since the pair has two endpoints. Clarify how this single string encodes the region A containing one member of the pair rather than the entire quark–antiquark worldsheet.
  4. [§II.D] The phrase 'the topological black hole acquires a nontrivial charge that depends on n' is potentially misleading; the quantity parametrized by zeta_h(n) is a curvature/horizon parameter, not a conserved charge. Rephrase to avoid confusion.
  5. [Appendix C.3, Eq. (C6)] The double integral in Eq. (C6) is missing explicit measure factors and domain of integration; please add them for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: C_E is a parameter-free analytic derivative of the standard probe action; the magic link is imported from an external theorem, not from a fitted input or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular in the sense relevant here. The excess capacity C_E is computed analytically from the known topological black hole horizon location ζ_h(n), the probe Nambu–Goto action Ĥ(n)=√λ(ζ_brane−ζ_h(n)), and the standard Lewkowycz–Maldacena/Dong relation eS_n=n^2∂_n Ĥ(n). No parameter is fitted to the claimed output: the result C_E=√λ(d−2)/(d−1)^3 follows purely by differentiating the externally fixed function ζ_h(n). The step connecting C_E>0 to nonlocal magic is Eq. (12)/App. A, which is explicitly attributed to the published external work [17] (Cao et al., PRX Quantum), not to prior work by the present author. The author's self-citations ([26], [63], [64]) enter as background and setup references, not as the load-bearing justification for the magic claim. The skeptical concern—that the O(√λ) excess capacity may not be the capacity of a normalized reduced density matrix to which Lemma 1 of [17] applies—is a substantive validity objection, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define nonlocal magic as its computed C_E, nor does it fit C_E to a target value, nor does it import its conclusion from an unverified self-citation. Thus no step reduces, by construction, to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters and no invented entities. λ and d are theory inputs; the acceleration a=E/M cancels out of all final quantities; ζ_brane drops out of all n-derivatives; nothing is fitted to data. The 'worldsheet wormhole' (Sec. II.A) and the topological black holes are prior-literature entities [69,75].

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT at large N_c and large λ with a probe-brane approximation (O(√λ) worldsheet; string breaking suppressed)
    The entire setup — Schwinger pair as an open string in AdS — presupposes a strongly coupled holographic dual; introduced on p.2 and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Semenoff–Zarembo worldsheet instanton plus Hartle–Hawking gluing yields the TFD state of Eq. (7)
    Borrowed from refs [66,69]; the inverse temperature β=2π/a and the EPR-interpretation rest on it (Sec. II.A).
  • domain assumption CHM map: spherical-region Rényi entropies equal partition functions on topological black holes with f_n(ζ) of Eq. (10) and ζ_h(n) of Eq. (11)
    Standard [74,75]; the smoothness condition fixing ζ_h(n) is reproduced in App. B.1 and checked to give ζ_h(1)=1.
  • standard math Dong/Lewkowycz–Maldacena: refined Rényi entropy S̃_n = n²∂_n Î(n) and C_E = −∂_n S̃_n|ₙ₌₁
    Cited [79,84]; used in Eqs. (14)–(15) and App. B.2.
  • domain assumption The pair's two-sided worldsheet is captured by a single probe string at fixed u=0 on H^{d−1}, extending radially from ζ_h(n) to ζ_brane with ζ_brane n-independent
    Asserted in App. B.2 after Eq. (B4); the reduction from the two-endpoint Hartle–Hawking wormhole is not derived — flagged as the weakest assumption.
  • domain assumption Lemma 1 of [17]: C_E(ρ_A)=0 ⟺ flat spectrum ⟺ M^(NL)(ψ_AB)=0, applied to the O(√λ) excess spectrum
    External published result quoted in Eq. (12)/App. A; the extension to an excess (non-normalized) spectrum is assumed, not proven.
  • domain assumption Boundary terms in the n-expansion vanish, so Eq. (15) follows from Eq. (14) without extra contributions
    Stated at the end of Sec. II.C with refs [78,85]; no derivation is given in the text.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14988 in / 32635 out tokens · 281788 ms · 2026-08-02T14:52:33.926917+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze the emergence of nonlocal magic in Schwinger pair creation in strong non-Abelian (chromo)electric fields using holography. The produced quark--antiquark pair is entangled into a color singlet, yet accelerates into causally disconnected Rindler wedges. Using the Casini--Huerta--Myers conformal mapping and the probe-brane framework, we compute the refined R\'enyi entropy and its derivative, which captures the antiflatness of the entanglement spectrum for a spherical bipartition. We find that for boundary spacetime dimension $d>2$, the entanglement spectrum is non-flat, implying the dynamical generation of nonlocal magic in the pair creation process. Interestingly, the nonlocal magic in the holographic dual can be obtained from the free energy of the probe action.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Magic without a phase: phase-independent stabilizer R\'enyi entropy in gluon scattering

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A phase-averaged stabilizer Rényi entropy is introduced for tree-level gluon scattering, with color-independent phase-independent magic that is larger in 3→2 than 2→2 and has a soft-limit lower bound in 2→3.

  2. A journey through Flatland: What does the antiflatness of a spectrum teach us?

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces antiflatness of entanglement spectra, antiflat majorization based on Rényi entropy spread, and unifies measures via escort distributions while connecting capacity of entanglement to quantum Fisher information.

  3. A journey through Flatland: What does the antiflatness of a spectrum teach us?

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defines antiflatness of entanglement spectra, introduces antiflat majorization and FPOs for state convertibility, unifies measures via escort distributions and Bregman divergences, expresses Capacity of Entanglement a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 89 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Quantum Com- plexity and New Directions in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics Phenomenology (2026), arXiv:2604.26376 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Haferkamp, P

    J. Haferkamp, P. Faist, N. B. T. Kothakonda, J. Eis- ert, and N. Y. Halpern, Linear growth of quan- tum circuit complexity, Nature Phys.18, 528 (2022), arXiv:2106.05305 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025001 (2019), arXiv:1806.06107 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    A. R. Brown and L. Susskind, Second law of quan- tum complexity, Phys. Rev. D97, 086015 (2018), arXiv:1701.01107 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010), arXiv:0808.3773 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Leone, S

    L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, and A. Hamma, Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 050402 (2022), arXiv:2106.12587 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Robin, M

    C. Robin, M. J. Savage, and N. Pillet, Entangle- ment Rearrangement in Self-Consistent Nuclear Struc- ture Calculations, Phys. Rev. C103, 034325 (2021), arXiv:2007.09157 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Haug and L

    T. Haug and L. Piroli, Stabilizer entropies and non- stabilizerness monotones, Quantum7, 1092 (2023), arXiv:2303.10152 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    P. S. Tarabunga, Critical behaviors of non-stabilizerness in quantum spin chains, Quantum8, 1413 (2024), arXiv:2309.00676 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    S. M. Hengstenberg, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Multi-body entanglement and information rearrange- ment in nuclear many-body systems: a study of the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 231 (2023), arXiv:2306.16535 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    T. Haug, L. Aolita, and M. S. Kim, Probing quan- tum complexity via universal saturation of stabilizer entropies, Quantum9, 1801 (2025), arXiv:2406.04190 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Emerson, D

    J. Emerson, D. Gottesman, S. A. H. Mousavian, and V. Veitch, The resource theory of stabilizer quan- tum computation, New J. Phys.16, 013009 (2014), arXiv:1307.7171 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Howard and E

    M. Howard and E. T. Campbell, Application of a Re- source Theory for Magic States to Fault-Tolerant Quan- tum Computing, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 090501 (2017), arXiv:1609.07488 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Hamaguchi, K

    H. Hamaguchi, K. Hamada, and N. Yoshioka, Hand- book for Efficiently Quantifying Robustness of Magic, Quantum8, 1461 (2024), arXiv:2311.01362 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Tirrito, P

    E. Tirrito, P. S. Tarabunga, G. Lami, T. Chanda, L. Leone, S. F. E. Oliviero, M. Dalmonte, M. Collura, and A. Hamma, Quantifying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness, Phys. Rev. A109, L040401 (2024), arXiv:2304.01175 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Chernyshev, C

    I. Chernyshev, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and computational complexity in the neutrino sector, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023228 (2025), arXiv:2411.04203 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, A. Hamma, L. Leone, W. Mu- nizzi, and S. F. E. Oliviero, Gravitational Backre- action is Magical, PRX Quantum6, 040375 (2025), arXiv:2403.07056 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Quantum complexity fluctuations from nuclear and hypernuclear forces, Phys. Rev. C112, 044004 (2025), arXiv:2405.10268 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Br¨ okemeier, S

    F. Br¨ okemeier, S. M. Hengstenberg, J. W. Keeble, C. E. Robin, F. Rocco, and M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and multipartite entanglement in the structure of nuclei, Physical Review C111, 034317 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Anti-Flatness and Non-Local Magic in Two-Particle Scattering Processes, (2025), arXiv:2510.23426 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. C. Halimeh, and N. S. Srivatsa, Krylov Complexity Meets Confinement, (2025), arXiv:2511.03783 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    C. D. White, C. Cao, and B. Swingle, Conformal field theories are magical, Phys. Rev. B103, 075145 (2021), 6 arXiv:2007.01303 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, K. Karthikeyan, C. Li, and J. Preskill, State-dependent geometries from magic- enriched quantum codes (2026), arXiv:2603.13475 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Z.-Y. Hou, C. Cao, and Z.-C. Yang, Stabilizer Entanglement Enhances Magic Injection (2025), arXiv:2503.20873 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Ebner, B

    L. Ebner, B. M¨ uller, A. Sch¨ afer, L. Schmotzer, C. Seidl, and X. Yao, The Magic Barrier before Thermalization, (2025), arXiv:2510.11681 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Grieninger, M

    S. Grieninger, M. J. Savage, and N. A. Zemlevskiy, The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model (2026), arXiv:2601.08825 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    K. Xu, U. Borla, K. Hemery, R. Joshi, H. Dreyer, E. Rinaldi, and J. C. Halimeh, Observation of glue- ball excitations and string breaking in a 2 + 1DZ 2 lat- tice gauge theory on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2604.07435 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Joshi, Y

    R. Joshi, Y. Tian, K. Hemery, N. S. Srivatsa, J. J. Osborne, H. Dreyer, E. Rinaldi, and J. C. Halimeh, Observation of genuine 2 + 1D string dynamics in a U(1) lattice gauge theory with a tunable plaque- tte term on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2604.07436 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    J. Cao, R. Joshi, Y. Tian, N. S. Srivatsa, and J. C. Halimeh, String Breaking and Glueball Dynam- ics in 2 + 1D Quantum Link Electrodynamics (2026), arXiv:2601.16166 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    J. C. Halimeh, N. Mueller, J. Knolle, Z. Papi´ c, and Z. Davoudi, Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories, arXiv:2509.03586 [quant- ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Cao, Non-trivial area operators require non-local magic (2024), arXiv:2306.14996 [hep-th]

    C. Cao, Non-trivial area operators require non-local magic (2024), arXiv:2306.14996 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identifi- cation¡? format?¿ of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states, Physical review letters101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  33. [33]

    Z.-C. Yang, A. Hamma, S. M. Giampaolo, E. R. Mucciolo, and C. Chamon, Entanglement Complex- ity in Quantum Many-Body Dynamics, Thermaliza- tion and Localization, Phys. Rev. B96, 020408 (2017), arXiv:1703.03420 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization, Phys

    J. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  35. [35]

    Jensen and A

    K. Jensen and A. Karch, Holographic Dual of an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Pair has a Wormhole, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 211602 (2013), arXiv:1307.1132 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Sonner, Holographic Schwinger Effect and the Ge- ometry of Entanglement, Phys

    J. Sonner, Holographic Schwinger Effect and the Ge- ometry of Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 211603 (2013), arXiv:1307.6850 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Jensen and J

    K. Jensen and J. Sonner, Wormholes and entanglement in holography, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1442003 (2014), arXiv:1405.4817 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    Buyens, J

    B. Buyens, J. Haegeman, H. Verschelde, F. Verstraete, and K. Van Acoleyen, Confinement and string breaking for QED 2 in the Hamiltonian picture, Phys. Rev. X6, 041040 (2016), arXiv:1509.00246 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Grieninger, D

    S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, and E. Marro- quin, Thermal nature of confining strings, (2025), arXiv:2510.23919 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, A. Palermo, and S. Shi, Thermalization from quantum entanglement: Jet simulations in the massive schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D112, 094502 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. Kharzeev, V. Ko- repin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Real-Time Nonperturbative Dynamics of Jet Production in Schwinger Model: Quan- tum Entanglement and Vacuum Modification, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 021902 (2023), arXiv:2301.11991 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Florio, D

    A. Florio, D. Frenklakh, K. Ikeda, D. E. Kharzeev, V. Korepin, S. Shi, and K. Yu, Quantum real-time evo- lution of entanglement and hadronization in jet produc- tion: Lessons from the massive Schwinger model, Phys. Rev. D110, 094029 (2024), arXiv:2404.00087 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Barata and E

    J. Barata and E. Rico, Real-time simulation of jet en- ergy loss and entropy production in high-energy scat- tering with matter, arXiv:2502.17558 [hep-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Artiaco, J

    C. Artiaco, J. Barata, and E. Rico, Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics in a U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory via Local Information Flows: Scattering and String Breaking, arXiv:2510.16101 [quant-ph] (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Verdel, F

    R. Verdel, F. Liu, S. Whitsitt, A. V. Gorshkov, and M. Heyl, Real-time dynamics of string breaking in quan- tum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 014308 (2020), arXiv:1911.11382 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Verdel, G.-Y

    R. Verdel, G.-Y. Zhu, and M. Heyl, Dynamical Lo- calization Transition of String Breaking in Quantum Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 230402 (2023), arXiv:2304.12957 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Mallick, M

    A. Mallick, M. Lewenstein, J. Zakrzewski, and M. P lodzie´ n, String-breaking dynamics in an Ising chain with local vibrations, Phys. Rev. B112, 024311 (2025), arXiv:2501.00604 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    T. A. Cochranet al., Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories, Nature 642, 315 (2025), arXiv:2409.17142 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Gonzalez-Cuadraet al., Observation of string break- ing on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature 642, 321 (2025), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    D. Gonzalez-Cuadraet al., Observation of string break- ing on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature 642, 321 (2025), arXiv:2410.16558 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Borla, J

    U. Borla, J. J. Osborne, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String Breaking in a 2 + 1DZ 2 Lattice Gauge Theory, arXiv:2501.17929 [quant-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Cataldi, S

    G. Cataldi, S. Orlando, and J. C. Halimeh, Real-Time String Dynamics in a 2+1D Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory: String Breaking, Glueball Formation, Baryon Blockade, and Tension Reduction, arXiv:2509.08868 [hep-lat] (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    K. Xu, U. Borla, S. Moroz, and J. C. Halimeh, String Breaking Dynamics and Glueball Formation in a 2 + 1D Lattice Gauge Theory, arXiv:2507.01950 [hep-lat] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Di Marcantonio, S

    F. Di Marcantonio, S. Pradhan, S. Vallecorsa, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and E. R. Ortega, Roughening and dynamics of an electric flux string in a (2+1)D lattice gauge theory, arXiv:2505.23853 [hep-lat] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum Simulation of SU(3) Lattice Yang-Mills Theory at Leading Order in Large-Nc Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 111901 (2024), arXiv:2402.10265 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum Simula- tion of Large N Lattice Gauge Theories, PoSLA T- TICE2024, 206 (2025), arXiv:2411.16704 [hep-lat]. 7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Crippa, K

    A. Crippa, K. Jansen, and E. Rinaldi, Analysis of the confinement string in (2 + 1)-dimensional Quan- tum Electrodynamics with a trapped-ion quantum com- puter, arXiv:2411.05628 [hep-lat] (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Liu, W.-Y

    Y. Liu, W.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, M.-G. He, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, String-Breaking Mechanism in a Lat- tice Schwinger Model Simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 101902 (2025), arXiv:2411.15443 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Deet al., Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph] (2024)

    A. Deet al., Observation of string-breaking dynamics in a quantum simulator, arXiv:2410.13815 [quant-ph] (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    F. M. Suraceet al., String-Breaking Dynamics in Quantum Adiabatic and Diabatic Processes, arXiv:2411.10652 [quant-ph] (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    A. N. Ciavarella, String breaking in the heavy quark limit with scalable circuits, Phys. Rev. D111, 054501 (2025), arXiv:2411.05915 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Alexandrou, A

    C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Blekos, G. Polykratis, and S. K¨ uhn, Realizing string breaking dynamics in aZ 2 lattice gauge theory on quantum hardware, arXiv:2504.13760 [hep-lat] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Luoet al., Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition, arXiv:2505.09607 [quant-ph] (2025)

    D. Luoet al., Quantum simulation of bubble nucleation across a quantum phase transition, arXiv:2505.09607 [quant-ph] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Grieninger, D

    S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, and I. Zahed, Entangle- ment in a holographic Schwinger pair with confinement, Phys. Rev. D108, 086030 (2023), arXiv:2305.07121 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Grieninger, D

    S. Grieninger, D. E. Kharzeev, and I. Zahed, En- tanglement entropy in a time-dependent holographic Schwinger pair creation, Phys. Rev. D108, 126014 (2023), arXiv:2310.12042 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Xiao, On the exact solution of the accelerating string in AdS(5) space, Phys

    B.-W. Xiao, On the exact solution of the accelerating string in AdS(5) space, Phys. Lett. B665, 173 (2008), arXiv:0804.1343 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    G. W. Semenoff and K. Zarembo, Holographic Schwinger Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 171601 (2011), arXiv:1109.2920 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [67]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Exact results for the entanglement entropy and the energy radiated by a quark, JHEP05, 025, arXiv:1312.5682 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Chernicoff, A

    M. Chernicoff, A. G¨ uijosa, and J. F. Pedraza, Holo- graphic EPR Pairs, Wormholes and Radiation, JHEP 10, 211, arXiv:1308.3695 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Jensen, A

    K. Jensen, A. Karch, and B. Robinson, Holographic dual of a Hawking pair has a wormhole, Phys. Rev. D90, 064019 (2014), arXiv:1405.2065 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    V. E. Hubeny and G. W. Semenoff, Holographic Accelerated Heavy Quark-Anti-Quark Pair (2014), arXiv:1410.1172 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Ghodrati, Schwinger Effect and Entanglement En- tropy in Confining Geometries, Phys

    M. Ghodrati, Schwinger Effect and Entanglement En- tropy in Confining Geometries, Phys. Rev. D92, 065015 (2015), arXiv:1506.08557 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    G. W. Semenoff, Lectures on the holographic duality of gauge fields and strings (2018), arXiv:1808.04074 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for en- tangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys.61, 781 (2013), arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    Casini, M

    H. Casini, M. Huerta, and R. C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05, 036, arXiv:1102.0440 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Emparan, AdS / CFT duals of topological black holes and the entropy of zero energy states, JHEP06, 036, arXiv:hep-th/9906040

    R. Emparan, AdS / CFT duals of topological black holes and the entropy of zero energy states, JHEP06, 036, arXiv:hep-th/9906040

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  77. [77]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP08, 045, arXiv:hep- th/0605073

    arXiv

  78. [78]

    Chalabi, S

    A. Chalabi, S. P. Kumar, A. O’Bannon, A. Priby- tok, R. Rodgers, and J. Sisti, Holographic entangle- ment entropy of the Coulomb branch, JHEP04, 153, arXiv:2012.05188 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  79. [79]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravita- tional entropy, JHEP08, 090, arXiv:1304.4926 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Karch and C

    A. Karch and C. F. Uhlemann, Generalized gravita- tional entropy of probe branes: flavor entanglement holographically, JHEP05, 017, arXiv:1402.4497 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.