Reconstructing slow-roll Scalar-Tensor Gauss-Bonnet single field inflation from running spectral data

A. Belhaj; E. Torrente-Lujan; H. Es-Sobbahi; M. Oualaid

arxiv: 2108.11881 · v2 · pith:47TY2F73new · submitted 2021-08-26 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Reconstructing slow-roll Scalar-Tensor Gauss-Bonnet single field inflation from running spectral data

A. Belhaj , H. Es-Sobbahi , M. Oualaid , E. Torrente-Lujan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

keywords inflationscalar-tensor gravityGauss-Bonnet termslow-roll approximationspectral index runningPlanck constraintsconsistency relations

0 comments

The pith

Scalar-tensor Gauss-Bonnet inflation models yield explicit consistency equations among spectral indexes, their runnings, and model parameters under slow-roll.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies single-field inflation in a family of scalar-tensor theories that include non-minimal kinetic couplings and Gauss-Bonnet terms. Working in the slow-roll regime, it derives expressions for the scalar and tensor spectral indexes, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and the first and second runnings of these quantities directly in terms of the model functions. It then obtains hierarchies of consistency relations that connect the scalar and tensor sectors at successive orders in the slow-roll expansion. For one concrete choice of the coupling functions the resulting predictions are compared with the latest Planck constraints on the running parameters.

Core claim

Within the slow-roll approximation applied to scalar-tensor models with scalar-dependent kinetic terms and Gauss-Bonnet corrections, the observables and their runnings satisfy a set of algebraic consistency equations that relate the perturbation spectra to the underlying model parameters; these equations furnish explicit constraints that a specific representative model satisfies when confronted with Planck data.

What carries the argument

Hierarchies of consistency equations that relate scalar and tensor perturbations together with their first and second runnings, all evaluated at slow-roll order.

If this is right

The runnings of the spectral indexes impose algebraic relations among the scalar-tensor coupling functions.
A concrete model can be tuned so that its predicted values for n_s, r, alpha_s and beta_s lie inside the Planck contours.
The same consistency structure applies to both scalar and tensor sectors at each order in the slow-roll expansion.
Higher-order runnings are determined once the first-order parameters are fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same reconstruction technique could be applied to other higher-curvature corrections beyond Gauss-Bonnet.
Future CMB experiments sensitive to the third running would further restrict the allowed coupling functions.
If the consistency equations hold, they offer a model-independent way to test whether an observed spectrum originates from this class of theories.

Load-bearing premise

The slow-roll approximation remains valid across the range of scales probed by current observations.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the running of the running that lies outside the region allowed by the derived consistency equations for every choice of the model functions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2108.11881 by A. Belhaj, E. Torrente-Lujan, H. Es-Sobbahi, M. Oualaid.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The scalar spectral index ns vs the tensor-to-scalar ratio r different values of number of e-folds N and 7 ≤ m1 ≤ 40. where one has dnS d log a = −n 0 Sϕ,N , (4.27) dnS d log a = − n 2 (1 + c) 2 (A1 + A2) A3 . Here, the terms Ai take the following form A1 = (1 + bϕm1 ) (4 + 2n)(1 + bϕm1 ) + bm1ϕ m1 (4 + n) A2 = bm2 1ϕ m1 (−1 + bϕm1 ) A3 = ϕ 4 (1 + bϕm1 ) 4 . For the sake of illustration we present some… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The running of the scalar spectral indexes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We examine cosmological inflation in a broad family of scalar-tensor models characterized by scalar-dependent non minimal kinetic couplings and Gauss-Bonnet terms. Using a slow roll-approximation, we compute in detail theoretical expectations of observables as spectral indexes, scalar-to-tensor ratio, their running and their running of the running in terms of the parameters which characterize the scalar-tensor model. Hierarchies of consistency equations relating scalar and tensor pertubations and higher order running parameters are presented and examined at the slow roll approximation for the kind of models of interest in this work. From We find detailed expressions for constraints among these parameters. For a specific model, we analyse such quantities and make contact with latest Planck observational data .

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Paper gives routine slow-roll expressions and consistency relations for Gauss-Bonnet inflation models but leaves the slow-roll validity for fitted parameters unverified.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper works out explicit slow-roll formulas for the spectral index, tensor-to-scalar ratio, runnings, and consistency relations in a family of scalar-tensor models with non-minimal kinetic terms and Gauss-Bonnet couplings, then fits one case to Planck data. The hierarchies of consistency equations relating scalar and tensor perturbations are laid out in detail in terms of the model parameters. That part follows the standard machinery but collects the expressions in one place, which could be convenient for people already working on these models. The calculation itself is transparent and applies known techniques without introducing new methods or resolving an open theoretical problem. The data comparison is the weaker element. The observables are generated from the model parameters and matched to Planck constraints, but there is no reported check that the slow-roll parameters stay small across the 50-60 e-folds that correspond to CMB scales for the best-fit values. If the approximation fails in that range, the derived constraints and contact with data do not hold. The work is an incremental extension rather than a first-principles advance, and the circularity of fitting the same parameters used to define the observables is not offset by any independent benchmark. This is the sort of paper that specialists in modified-gravity inflation might want for the formulas and relations. A broader audience or anyone looking for new physics will not find it useful. The thinking is clear on its own terms and engages the literature directly. I would not cite it, but a reading group focused on inflation models could usefully go through the consistency equations. It deserves peer review so the expressions can be verified and the validity check can be added.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines slow-roll inflation in a family of scalar-tensor models with non-minimal kinetic couplings and Gauss-Bonnet terms. It derives explicit expressions for the observables n_s, r, α_s, β_s and higher runnings in terms of the model parameters, presents hierarchies of consistency relations among scalar and tensor perturbations, and for one specific model performs a comparison of the predicted quantities to Planck data.

Significance. If the central results hold, the explicit parameter constraints and consistency equations provide a concrete framework for relating the scalar-tensor Gauss-Bonnet Lagrangian to measurable spectral quantities, which could aid model reconstruction from running data. The derivation of the full set of slow-roll expressions and relations is a technical contribution.

major comments (1)

[analysis of the specific model and Planck data comparison] The comparison of the specific model to Planck data (abstract and the dedicated analysis section) rests on the assumption that the slow-roll parameters remain small over the ~50–60 e-folds corresponding to CMB scales. No explicit check is reported that the fitted parameter values keep ε, |η| ≪ 1 throughout this range; if they do not, the derived observables and consistency relations cease to apply to the data comparison.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the sentence beginning 'From We find detailed expressions' contains an apparent typographical error and should be rephrased for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting this important point regarding the validity of the slow-roll approximation in the data comparison. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The comparison of the specific model to Planck data (abstract and the dedicated analysis section) rests on the assumption that the slow-roll parameters remain small over the ~50–60 e-folds corresponding to CMB scales. No explicit check is reported that the fitted parameter values keep ε, |η| ≪ 1 throughout this range; if they do not, the derived observables and consistency relations cease to apply to the data comparison.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification that the slow-roll parameters remain small over the relevant range of e-folds is necessary to support the data comparison. In the revised manuscript we will add a new figure (or table) in the dedicated analysis section showing the evolution of ε(N) and η(N) for the best-fit parameter values over 50–60 e-folds, confirming that both quantities satisfy ε, |η| ≪ 1 throughout this interval. This addition will directly address the referee’s concern and strengthen the applicability of the derived observables and consistency relations to the Planck data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation derives observables from slow-roll then compares to external Planck data

full rationale

The paper derives expressions for n_s, r, running parameters and consistency relations under the slow-roll approximation in terms of scalar-tensor Gauss-Bonnet model parameters, then for one specific model compares the resulting quantities to Planck data. This is a standard forward derivation followed by external data confrontation. No quoted step reduces by construction to its own inputs (no self-definitional loop, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no load-bearing self-citation chain). The slow-roll assumption is an input approximation whose validity is not internally verified for fitted values, but that is a correctness issue, not a circularity reduction. The chain remains self-contained against the external benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the slow-roll regime and on the specific functional form chosen for the non-minimal couplings; both are introduced without independent evidence beyond the model definition itself.

free parameters (1)

parameters characterizing the scalar-tensor model
Abstract states that observables are expressed in terms of these parameters and that a specific model is fitted to data.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Slow-roll approximation is valid for the models of interest
Invoked to compute all spectral quantities and consistency relations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5668 in / 1221 out tokens · 21358 ms · 2026-05-24T13:18:14.919398+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using a slow roll-approximation, we compute in detail theoretical expectations of observables as spectral indexes, scalar-to-tensor ratio, their running... in terms of the parameters which characterize the scalar-tensor model.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

V = λ/n ϕ^n, J1 = β'1 ϕ^{m1-n}, J2 = β'2 ϕ^{m2-n}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

[1]

B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientiﬁc and Virgo Collaborations], Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) no.6, 061102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016
[2]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], Astrophys. J.875 (2019) no.1, L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019
[3]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], Astrophys. J.875 (2019) no.1, L6. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019
[4]

A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)

work page 1981
[5]

Albrecht

A. Albrecht. P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev Lett. 48, 1220 (1982)

work page 1982
[6]

A. R. Ade et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inﬂation), Astron. and Astrophys. 571 (2014) A22; arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[7]

P. A. R. Ade et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inﬂation), Astron. and Astrophys. 594, (2016) A20; arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[8]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akrami et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on in- ﬂation), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

A. D. Linde, Particle physics and inﬂationary cosmology, (Harwood, Chur, Switzer- land, 1990) Contemp. Concepts Phys. 5, 1 (1990) [hep-th/0503203]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990
[10]

A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rept. 231, 1 (1993); arXiv:astro-ph/9303019

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[11]

Inflation and the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations

A. Riotto, DFPD-TH/02/22; arXiv:hep-ph/0210162

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

D. H. Lyth, A. Riotto, Phys. Rept. 314, 1 (1999); arXiv:hep-ph/9807278

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[13]

Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

work page 2005
[14]

TASI Lectures on Inflation

D. Baumann, TASI 2009; arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[15]

A. A. Starobinsky and and H. J. Schmidt, Class. Quant. Grav. 4, 695 (1987)

work page 1987
[16]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1981) 549]

work page 1981
[17]

A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30 (1979) 719]

work page 1979
[18]

S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. B 115, 295 (1982)

work page 1982
[19]

A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175. 15

work page 1982
[20]

A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110 (1982)

work page 1982
[21]

J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980)

work page 1980
[22]

J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 28, 679 (1983)

work page 1983
[23]

Inflation with explicit parametric connection between General Relativity and Scalar-Tensor gravity

I. Fomin and S. Chervon, “Inﬂation with explicit parametric connection between general relativity and scalar–tensor gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) no.28, 1850161 doi:10.1142/S0217732318501614 [arXiv:1802.10462 [gr-qc]]. I. Fomin and S. Chervon, “Exact and Slow-Roll Solutions for Exponential Power-Law Inﬂa- tion Connected with Modiﬁed Gravity and O...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732318501614 2018
[24]

Hikmawan, A

G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Nonlinearity analysis for cosmological inﬂation with minimal and non-minimal coupling of scalar ﬁeld from horndeski theory for special cases: de sitter expansion and decaying scalar ﬁeld,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1949 (2021) no.1, 012001 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1949/1/012001

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1949/1/012001 1949
[25]

Extracting new inﬂation model from the most general scalar-tensor theory,

G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Extracting new inﬂation model from the most general scalar-tensor theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1127 (2019) no.1, 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012007 G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Power function inﬂation potential analysis for cosmological model with Gauss- Bonnet term,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 856 (2017) ...

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012007 2019
[26]

The consistency equation hierarchy in single-field inflation models

M. Cortes and A. R. Liddle, “The Consistency equation hierarchy in single-ﬁeld inﬂation models,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006), 083523 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083523 [arXiv:astro-ph/0603016 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.083523 2006
[27]

On what scale should inflationary observables be constrained?

M. Cortes, A. R. Liddle and P. Mukherjee, “On what scale should in- ﬂationary observables be constrained?,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007), 083520 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083520 [arXiv:astro-ph/0702170 [astro-ph]]. G. Cabass, E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, E. Pajer and J. Silk, “Constraints on the running of the running of the scalar tilt from CMB anisotropies a...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.083520 2007
[28]

Small ﬁeld models of inﬂation that predict a tensor-to-scalar ratio r = 0 .03,

I. Wolfson and R. Brustein, “Small ﬁeld models of inﬂation that predict a tensor-to-scalar ratio r = 0 .03,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.4, 043522 16 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043522 [arXiv:1903.11820 [astro-ph.CO]]. L. Wu, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Jia and T. Li, “The Upper Bound on the Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio Con- sistent with Quantum Gravity,” Commun. Theor. Ph...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043522 2019
[29]

Reconstruction of inflation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio

J. Chen, “Reconstruction of inﬂation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio,” [arXiv:1904.04293 [gr-qc]]. Q. Huang, H. Huang, F. Tu, L. Zhang and J. Chen, “Slow expansion in the scalar-tensor theory of gravity,” Annals Phys. 409 (2019), 167921 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167921 J. Chen, “Reconstruction of inﬂation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio,” [arXiv:1904.042...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167921 1904
[30]

P. A. R. Ade et al., A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 101301 (2015); arXiv:1502.00612 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[31]

L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, arXiv:1905.08349 [gr-qc]. L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, arXiv:1907.06806 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv 1905

[1] [1]

B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientiﬁc and Virgo Collaborations], Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) no.6, 061102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

[2] [2]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], Astrophys. J.875 (2019) no.1, L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

[3] [3]

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], Astrophys. J.875 (2019) no.1, L6. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019

[4] [4]

A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)

work page 1981

[5] [5]

Albrecht

A. Albrecht. P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev Lett. 48, 1220 (1982)

work page 1982

[6] [6]

A. R. Ade et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inﬂation), Astron. and Astrophys. 571 (2014) A22; arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[7] [7]

P. A. R. Ade et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inﬂation), Astron. and Astrophys. 594, (2016) A20; arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[8] [8]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akrami et al., Planck Collaboration (Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on in- ﬂation), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[9] [9]

A. D. Linde, Particle physics and inﬂationary cosmology, (Harwood, Chur, Switzer- land, 1990) Contemp. Concepts Phys. 5, 1 (1990) [hep-th/0503203]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990

[10] [10]

A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rept. 231, 1 (1993); arXiv:astro-ph/9303019

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

[11] [11]

Inflation and the Theory of Cosmological Perturbations

A. Riotto, DFPD-TH/02/22; arXiv:hep-ph/0210162

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[12] [12]

D. H. Lyth, A. Riotto, Phys. Rept. 314, 1 (1999); arXiv:hep-ph/9807278

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[13] [13]

Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

work page 2005

[14] [14]

TASI Lectures on Inflation

D. Baumann, TASI 2009; arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[15] [15]

A. A. Starobinsky and and H. J. Schmidt, Class. Quant. Grav. 4, 695 (1987)

work page 1987

[16] [16]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1981) 549]

work page 1981

[17] [17]

A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30 (1979) 719]

work page 1979

[18] [18]

S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. B 115, 295 (1982)

work page 1982

[19] [19]

A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175. 15

work page 1982

[20] [20]

A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110 (1982)

work page 1982

[21] [21]

J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980)

work page 1980

[22] [22]

J. M. Bardeen, P. J. Steinhardt and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 28, 679 (1983)

work page 1983

[23] [23]

Inflation with explicit parametric connection between General Relativity and Scalar-Tensor gravity

I. Fomin and S. Chervon, “Inﬂation with explicit parametric connection between general relativity and scalar–tensor gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) no.28, 1850161 doi:10.1142/S0217732318501614 [arXiv:1802.10462 [gr-qc]]. I. Fomin and S. Chervon, “Exact and Slow-Roll Solutions for Exponential Power-Law Inﬂa- tion Connected with Modiﬁed Gravity and O...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732318501614 2018

[24] [24]

Hikmawan, A

G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Nonlinearity analysis for cosmological inﬂation with minimal and non-minimal coupling of scalar ﬁeld from horndeski theory for special cases: de sitter expansion and decaying scalar ﬁeld,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1949 (2021) no.1, 012001 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1949/1/012001

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1949/1/012001 1949

[25] [25]

Extracting new inﬂation model from the most general scalar-tensor theory,

G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Extracting new inﬂation model from the most general scalar-tensor theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1127 (2019) no.1, 012007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012007 G. Hikmawan, A. Suroso and F. P. Zen, “Power function inﬂation potential analysis for cosmological model with Gauss- Bonnet term,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 856 (2017) ...

work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1127/1/012007 2019

[26] [26]

The consistency equation hierarchy in single-field inflation models

M. Cortes and A. R. Liddle, “The Consistency equation hierarchy in single-ﬁeld inﬂation models,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006), 083523 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083523 [arXiv:astro-ph/0603016 [astro-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.083523 2006

[27] [27]

On what scale should inflationary observables be constrained?

M. Cortes, A. R. Liddle and P. Mukherjee, “On what scale should in- ﬂationary observables be constrained?,” Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007), 083520 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083520 [arXiv:astro-ph/0702170 [astro-ph]]. G. Cabass, E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, E. Pajer and J. Silk, “Constraints on the running of the running of the scalar tilt from CMB anisotropies a...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.083520 2007

[28] [28]

Small ﬁeld models of inﬂation that predict a tensor-to-scalar ratio r = 0 .03,

I. Wolfson and R. Brustein, “Small ﬁeld models of inﬂation that predict a tensor-to-scalar ratio r = 0 .03,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.4, 043522 16 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043522 [arXiv:1903.11820 [astro-ph.CO]]. L. Wu, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Jia and T. Li, “The Upper Bound on the Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio Con- sistent with Quantum Gravity,” Commun. Theor. Ph...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043522 2019

[29] [29]

Reconstruction of inflation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio

J. Chen, “Reconstruction of inﬂation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio,” [arXiv:1904.04293 [gr-qc]]. Q. Huang, H. Huang, F. Tu, L. Zhang and J. Chen, “Slow expansion in the scalar-tensor theory of gravity,” Annals Phys. 409 (2019), 167921 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167921 J. Chen, “Reconstruction of inﬂation model from tensor-to-scalar ratio,” [arXiv:1904.042...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.167921 1904

[30] [30]

P. A. R. Ade et al., A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 101301 (2015); arXiv:1502.00612 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[31] [31]

L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, arXiv:1905.08349 [gr-qc]. L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, arXiv:1907.06806 [hep-th]. 17

work page arXiv 1905