Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 120 references

This paper derives a nonlocal time–energy uncertainty principle and shows existing thorium-229 clock data already bound the Moffat nonlocality scale to above 22 MeV, with nuclear-enhanced estimates in the GeV range.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Published 229Th clock data, under an assumed quadratic nonlocal frequency-shift with unit coefficient, set E_M > 22.3 MeV (direct), >1.72 GeV (enhanced), and up to ~27 TeV (nuclear-scale illustration).

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection First 229Th clock bounds on Moffat's nonlocality scale, but the headline numbers rest on an assumed shift formula, not on the derived broadening law. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18333 v4 pith:5I6DNDQN submitted 2026-07-19 quant-ph hep-exhep-phhep-thnucl-th

A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure

E. J. Thompson , Arvin Kouroshnia , J. W. Moffat , C. Chyrak , G. Gervais , H. A. Carteret This is my paper
classification quant-ph hep-exhep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords nonlocal quantum field theorytime-energy uncertainty principlethorium-229 nuclear clockMoffat energynonlocality scalevariance addition lawclock frequency precisionnuclear sensitivity enhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the newly demonstrated thorium-229 nuclear clock—whose transition sits at 8.36 eV—is already precise enough to constrain a much higher fundamental scale, the Moffat nonlocality energy E_M at which time–energy uncertainty is modified. It first derives a nonlocal time–energy uncertainty relation from a variance-addition law: a nonlocal response kernel adds an irreducible width to any measured clock time or energy distribution. It then treats the published thorium-229 clock residuals (frequency uncertainty, reproducibility, day-stability) as limits on an unexplained fractional frequency shift, obtaining lower bounds E_M > 22.3 MeV in the direct channel, > 1.72 GeV with a phenomenological nuclear-sensitivity enhancement, and TeV-scale illustrative bounds if a nuclear-scale reference energy is assumed. The paper stresses these are motivating bounds, not definitive exclusions, because the experiments were not designed to test nonlocal field theory.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a nonlocal response kernel—an entire-function regulator built from the d'Alembertian—modifies the time–energy uncertainty principle by adding a finite variance τ_F^2 to measured clock-time distributions and ε_F^2 to measured energy distributions, so that (ΔT_F)^2 = (ΔT)^2 + τ_F^2 with τ_F = α_t ħ/E_M. Combined with the ordinary Heisenberg bound this yields a minimum clock-time scale set by the nonlocality energy E_M. To turn this into numbers, the paper parameterizes the leading correction to the thorium-229 clock frequency as |δν_NL|/ν_Th = |β_NL|(E_ref/E_M)^2 with |β_NL|=1, then uses the published clock residuals δ_res as upper limits on an unexplained fra

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the variance-addition law (Eq. 18), (ΔT_F)^2 = (ΔT)^2 + τ_F^2, and its energy analogue (ΔE_F)^2 = (ΔE)^2 + ε_F^2: a normalized, centered nonlocal response kernel adds its own variance to—and never subtracts from—the measured width. This produces a nonlocal time resolution bound ΔT_F ≥ sqrt(ℏ^2/(4(ΔE)^2) + τ_F^2) and an irreducible clock-time scale τ_F = α_t ħ/E_M. The numerical bounds are then carried by a separate low-energy parameterization, |δν_NL|/ν_Th = |β_NL|(E_ref/E_M)^n with n=2 and |β_NL|=1, combined with the interpretation of published clock residuals δ_res as the maximum allowed unexplained fractional shift, yielding E_M > E_ref (A/δ_res)^{1/2} for the

Load-bearing premise

The bounds assume the nonlocal effect appears as a line-center shift of fractional size (E_ref/E_M)^2 with order-one coefficient, and that published clock reproducibility δ_res bounds that shift; the paper's own derivation gives an added linewidth variance, not a shift, so if the effect is symmetric broadening or the coefficient is small, the exclusions do not follow.

What would settle it

Measure the 229Th clock linewidth as a function of interrogation time T. Local theory predicts a Fourier-limited width ∝ 1/T; the variance-addition law predicts a floor at τ_F = α_t ħ/E_M. A saturation plateau would confirm the nonlocal timescale; its absence down to the experimental resolution would show the nonlocal width lies below the reach, falsifying the scale bound under the assumed β_NL=1.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The nonlocality scale E_M is not automatically Planckian: existing clock precision constrains it to be above tens of MeV in the direct channel, and the bound rises as the inverse square root of clock residual.
  • Because the bound scales as E_ref (A/δ_res)^{1/2}, each order-of-magnitude improvement in clock reproducibility shifts the reach by roughly a factor of 3.2 in energy.
  • The thorium nuclear sensitivity factor K ≈ 5900, if applicable, carries the same data into the GeV range, making the 8-eV transition a viable probe of non-Planckian nonlocality.
  • A dedicated experiment targeting residual linewidth, dephasing, and time–energy covariance can isolate Σ_F^{(TE)} and turn the phenomenological constraint into a direct test of the variance-addition law.
  • Clock bounds and collider bounds are complementary probes: the clock constrains suppressed low-energy footprints of a high scale while colliders constrain direct high-energy production.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The clearest experimental target implied by the paper is not a frequency shift but a linewidth floor: if the variance-addition law holds, the 229Th line should show a saturation width τ_F = α_t ħ/E_M that does not shrink with longer interrogation, which is directly measurable in a Ramsey experiment.
  • The same variance-addition argument can be applied to other precision transitions with different reference energies (e.g., optical atomic clocks, hydrogen 1S-2S, or nuclear transitions in other isomers), offering a consistency check of the (E_ref/E_M)^2 scaling and a way to distinguish a clock-channel effect from mundane systematic shifts.
  • The quoted bounds are only meaningful if |β_NL| is of order one; a first-principles computation of β_NL from the underlying entire-function regulator would tell whether the clock channel is actually the most sensitive probe or whether the effect is suppressed below current reach.
  • If the nonlocal correction enters predominantly through a nuclear-scale reference energy rather than the photon energy, then different thorium hosts (CaF2 vs. MgF2 vs. ThF4) should exhibit host-dependent fractional shifts at the 10^-13 level—a testable prediction that could confirm or falsify the nuclear-scale channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives a nonlocal time–energy uncertainty relation by convolving the temporal/energy distributions with a nonlocal response kernel η_F(t) and χ_F(E), obtaining exact variance-addition laws (Eqs. 18 and 25). It then applies published 229Th nuclear-clock residuals to set lower bounds on the nonlocality scale E_M, using an assumed fractional frequency shift |δν_NL|/ν_Th = |β_NL| (E_ref/E_M)^n with n=2 and |β_NL|=1 (Eqs. 37 and 58). The direct clock-energy channel yields E_M > 22.3 MeV, the nuclear-enhanced channel yields E_M > 1.72 GeV, and nuclear-scale reference choices yield estimates up to tens of TeV. The paper repeatedly notes that the experiments were not designed for this purpose and that the bounds are model-dependent, framing them as first phenomenological estimates rather than definitive exclusions.

Significance. If the variance-addition law (Eq. 18) is correct, it is a clean formal result connecting nonlocal response kernels to line broadening. The paper is also transparent about many of its assumptions and separates the direct, enhanced, and nuclear-scale channels. However, the central applied claim—that existing thorium-229 clock data 'already exclude' nonlocal time–energy corrections below tens of MeV—is not established, because the bounds follow from an ad hoc line-center shift formula rather than from the derived broadening law. The derivation itself does not provide a line-center shift, and the experimental residuals used are measures of line-center precision, not linewidth. The paper therefore has value as a suggested experimental target and a formal derivation, but its headline numerical bounds are not direct consequences of either the theory or the data.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eqs. (18), (25), (37), (58)] The derived variance-addition law (ΔE_F)^2 = (ΔE)^2 + ε_F^2 describes broadening; under the centered-kernel assumptions (Eqs. 8–10, 23) the mean energy and time are unchanged. The numerical bounds, however, rely on the fractional line-center shift |δν_NL|/ν_Th = |β_NL|(E_ref/E_M)^n introduced in Eq. (37) and repeated as Eq. (58). No derivation from the regulator F(□) or the response kernels connects this shift to the variance-addition law. The bounds in Table I therefore do not follow from the nonlocal time–energy principle derived in §2; they follow from an independent, uncomputed coupling assumption. Please either derive the shift from the regulator or explicitly label the bounds as conditional on an assumed shift mechanism.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (57)–(61), (103)–(109); Table I] The quantities δ_freq, δ_rep, and δ_day are reported frequency uncertainties, reproducibility, and stability. These characterize the precision of the clock line center, not the linewidth. If the nonlocal effect is a symmetric broadening, as the variance-addition law suggests, these residuals do not constrain E_M at all. If instead the effect is a line-center shift, the coefficient β_NL and power n are arbitrary, so the resulting bound is the algebraic inverse of the assumed formula. Thus the statement in the concluding remarks that 'existing thorium–229 nuclear clock data already exclude nonlocal time–energy corrections below the tens-of-MeV scale' is not supported by the derived theory or by the data interpretation.
  3. [§4, Eqs. (75)–(83), (90)–(94)] The enhanced bounds use K = 5900 and the nuclear-scale bounds use E_ref = 1–10 MeV. These factors are borrowed from existing sensitivity analyses of the 229Th transition to variations of α and quark masses, but no coupling of the nonlocal regulator to the relevant nuclear parameter X is specified. The amplification factor K therefore does not necessarily apply to the nonlocal frequency shift. The paper acknowledges this model dependence, but the GeV and TeV values are still presented as 'bounds' in Table I and in the conclusion. They are reach estimates, not constraints, unless a concrete nonlocal correction to the nuclear Hamiltonian is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, first two paragraphs] The paragraph beginning 'We have spent the past year building on and reformulating...' is duplicated verbatim. Please remove one copy.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The notation r(E) = | eA(E)|² is unclear; presumably this is the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of A(t). Please use standard notation such as r(E)=|\tilde{A}(E)|² and define \tilde{A}.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous informal phrases and grammatical issues, e.g., 'so the logic is simple,' 'the takeaway we want to present,' and long run-on sentences. A thorough editorial pass is needed.
  4. [§6 ('WHY A LOW-ENERGY CLOCK CAN BOUND A HIGHER SCALE')] This section largely restates the algebra of Eq. (61). It could be condensed to a short paragraph, as the physical argument is already given in the introduction and the numerical section.
  5. [Abstract and conclusion] The abstract and conclusion say the data 'already exclude' certain scales, while the introduction and the limitations paragraph say the constraints are 'motivating bounds and not definitive exclusions.' Please harmonize the language to avoid overclaiming; the more cautious phrasing is the accurate one.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the clock bounds are conditional inversions of an explicitly stated parameterization, not hidden fits or self-citation-forced conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular under the definitions used here. Section II derives the variance-addition law (ΔT_F)^2 = (ΔT)^2 + τ_F^2 and (ΔE_F)^2 = (ΔE)^2 + ε_F^2 from a normalized, centered response kernel; this is an independent, self-contained derivation. The subsequent bound does not claim to follow from that law alone. Instead, Eq. (58) is introduced as a parameterization: 'We will parameterize the leading nonlocal contribution by ... |ΔνNL|/νTh = |βNL|(Eref/EM)^n', and Eq. (59) fixes 'the minimal choice: n = 2, |βNL| = 1'. The clock data enter only through the externally reported residual scales δfreq, δrep, δday. Eq. (61), E_M > E_ref(|β_NL|/δ_res)^{1/n}, is the algebraic inversion of that parameterization combined with inequality (60). That is conditional model inference, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction, and not a self-defined equivalence. The paper repeatedly labels the numbers as motivating bounds, e.g., 'These numbers are not presented as final experimental exclusions, but as the first laboratory-scale estimates of the nonlocality scale from nuclear-clock data,' and its own limitation paragraph states that δ_res 'is not a direct measurement of a nonlocal residual. It is inferred from clock uncertainty, reproducibility, and stability.' The only self-citation in the ansatz step, [55] for n=2, is paired with an external citation [54] and is not a load-bearing uniqueness claim. The possible mismatch between a line-broadening law and the use of line-center residuals is a physical/correctness limitation, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central numerical result depends on the assumed frequency-shift operator and the borrowed enhancement factor, not on a computation from the nonlocal regulator. The derived variance-addition principle is standard convolution mathematics.

free parameters (5)
  • β_NL = 1 (chosen)
    Eq. (59) sets the dimensionless coefficient of the nonlocal frequency shift to 1 without a calculation; all bounds scale as |β_NL|^{1/2}.
  • n = 2 (chosen)
    Eq. (59) fixes the leading power as quadratic, motivated by even entire-function expansion [54,55] but not derived for a bound-state transition.
  • K = 5900
    Eq. (77) imports the 229Th sensitivity to fine-structure constant variation as an amplifier for nonlocal corrections; the applicability to E_M is assumed.
  • E_ref (nuclear-scale) = 1 MeV and 10 MeV (illustrative)
    Eqs. (82)-(83) choose illustrative internal nuclear scales; explicitly model-dependent.
  • α_t = unspecified
    Eq. (11) defines the temporal response width via dimensionless α_t; it never enters the quoted bounds, illustrating the disconnect between the derived principle and the data analysis.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The nonlocal regulator induces a response kernel η_F(t) that is normalized, centered, and has finite variance τ_F^2.
    Assumed in Eqs. (8)-(10); no derivation from the specific regulator F(□).
  • standard math The measured time/energy distribution is the convolution of the local distribution with the nonlocal kernel, so variances add in quadrature.
    Eqs. (7), (17)-(18), (25); elementary probability, independent of NLQFT.
  • domain assumption Reported clock reproducibility/stability residuals (δ_res) bound any unexplained nonlocal frequency shift.
    Eqs. (28), (57); assumes no overlooked systematics and that clock uncertainty is an appropriate proxy for a shift.
  • ad hoc to paper The leading nonlocal clock-frequency correction is |β_NL|(E_ref/E_M)^n with n=2, β=1.
    Eqs. (37), (58)-(59); the key ansatz generating all bounds, not derived from the derived uncertainty relation.
  • ad hoc to paper The 229Th nuclear sensitivity K=5900 amplifies the nonlocal correction.
    Eqs. (75)-(77); K comes from α-variation studies [90,93,94], not from a nonlocal operator.
invented entities (1)
  • Nonlocal temporal response kernel η_F(t) no independent evidence
    purpose: Mimics an irreducible temporal fuzziness in clock measurements; produces the variance-addition law and the modified time-energy relation.
    Introduced with assumed normalization/centering/finite variance; no direct measurement or predicted observable outside the ansatz-based bounds.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5I6DNDQN

@misc{pith2026260718333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A First Bound on the Moffat Energy and Thorium--229 Clock as a Probe of the Nonlocal Time-Energy Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5I6DNDQN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18333}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The new thorium--229 nuclear clocks give us a new laboratory system in which to test if modification of the Time-Energy uncertainty principle is correct. In this paper we derive the nonlocal Time-Energy uncertainty principle and then apply the published $^{229}$Th nuclear clock data as a first probe of the nonlocality scale \(E_M\). We note that since these experiments were not designed to test nonlocal quantum field theory the constraints are interpreted as motivating bounds and not definitive exclusions. By using the direct clock-energy channel, we find conservative lower bounds on \(E_M\) at the tens of MeV scale, with optimistic present-data estimates reaching the hundred MeV scale. Including the known nuclear sensitivity enhancement of the $^{229}$Th transition gives us stronger model dependent bounds in the GeV range, while nuclear-scale reference-energy scenarios can reach the TeV range. The conclusion we draw from this is that nuclear clocks already provide an experimental route from nonlocal time--energy uncertainty to measurable laboratory bounds on non-Planckian nonlocality.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 22 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A Thorium-229 Optical Nuclear Clock with Feedback Loop,

    L. Toscani De Colet al., “A Thorium-229 Optical Nuclear Clock with Feedback Loop,” arXiv:2606.04997 [physics.atom-ph] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A Nuclear Clock Based on 229Th,

    B. Huanget al., “A Nuclear Clock Based on 229Th,” arXiv:2606.08870 [physics.atom-ph] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Towards a 229Th-Based Nuclear Clock,

    L. von der Wense, B. Seiferle, and P. G. Thirolf, “Towards a 229Th-Based Nuclear Clock,” Meas. Tech.60, 1178–1192 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    The 229Thorium Isomer: Doorway to the Road from the Atomic Clock to the Nuclear Clock,

    P. G. Thirolf, B. Seiferle, and L. von der Wense, “The 229Thorium Isomer: Doorway to the Road from the Atomic Clock to the Nuclear Clock,” J. Phys. B52, 203001 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    The 229Th Iso- mer: Prospects for a Nuclear Optical Clock,

    L. von der Wense and B. Seiferle, “The 229Th Iso- mer: Prospects for a Nuclear Optical Clock,” Eur. Phys. J. A56, 277 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Nuclear Clocks for Testing Fundamental Physics,

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. S. Safronova, A. P´ alffy, J. Weitenberg, and P. G. Thirolf, “Nuclear Clocks for Testing Fundamental Physics,” Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 034002 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    The Thorium-229 Low-Energy Isomer and the Nuclear Clock,

    K. Beeks, T. Sikorsky, T. Schumm, J. Thielking, M. V. Okhapkin, and E. Peik, “The Thorium-229 Low-Energy Isomer and the Nuclear Clock,” Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 238–248 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    The 229Th Isomer: Nuclear Structure, Clocks, and Tests of Fundamental Physics,

    X. Lu, R. Zhao, and S.-G. Zhou, “The 229Th Isomer: Nuclear Structure, Clocks, and Tests of Fundamental Physics,” arXiv:2606.26600 [nucl-th] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Chemische Entdeckungen im Min- eralreiche, gemacht zu Fahlun in Schweden: Sele- nium ein neuer metallartiger K¨ orper, Lithon ein neues Alkali, Thorina eine neue Erde,

    J. J. Berzelius, “Chemische Entdeckungen im Min- eralreiche, gemacht zu Fahlun in Schweden: Sele- nium ein neuer metallartiger K¨ orper, Lithon ein neues Alkali, Thorina eine neue Erde,” Ann. Phys. 59, 229–254 (1818)

  10. [10]

    Note sur la thorine,

    J. J. Berzelius, “Note sur la thorine,” Ann. Chim. Phys.28, 363–365 (1825)

  11. [11]

    Untersuchung eines neuen Miner- als und einer darin enthaltenen zuvor unbekannten Erde,

    J. J. Berzelius, “Untersuchung eines neuen Miner- als und einer darin enthaltenen zuvor unbekannten Erde,” Ann. Phys. Chem.92, 385–415 (1829)

  12. [12]

    Features of the Low-Energy Level Scheme of 229Th as Observed in the Alpha Decay of 233U,

    L. A. Kroger and C. W. Reich, “Features of the Low-Energy Level Scheme of 229Th as Observed in the Alpha Decay of 233U,” Nucl. Phys. A259, 29–60 (1976)

    1976

  13. [13]

    Energy Sepa- ration of the Doublet of Intrinsic States at the 15 Ground State of 229Th,

    C. W. Reich and R. G. Helmer, “Energy Sepa- ration of the Doublet of Intrinsic States at the 15 Ground State of 229Th,” Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 271– 273 (1990)

    1990

  14. [14]

    Additional Evidence for the Proposed Ex- cited State at 5 eV in 229Th,

    D. G. Burke, P. E. Garrett, T. Qu, and R. A. Nau- mann, “Additional Evidence for the Proposed Ex- cited State at 5 eV in 229Th,” Phys. Rev. C42, R499–R501 (1990)

    1990

  15. [15]

    An Excited State of 229Th at 3.5 eV,

    R. G. Helmer and C. W. Reich, “An Excited State of 229Th at 3.5 eV,” Phys. Rev. C49, 1845–1858 (1994)

    1994

  16. [16]

    Nuclear Struc- ture of 229Th from Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy of 233U Alpha-Particle Decay,

    V. Barci, G. Ardisson, G. Barci-Funel, B. Weiss, O. El Samad, and R. K. Sheline, “Nuclear Struc- ture of 229Th from Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy of 233U Alpha-Particle Decay,” Phys. Rev. C68, 034329 (2003)

    2003

  17. [17]

    Nuclear Structure of 229Th,

    E. Ruchowskaet al., “Nuclear Structure of 229Th,” Phys. Rev. C73, 044326 (2006)

    2006

  18. [18]

    Energy Split- ting of the Ground-State Doublet in the Nucleus 229Th,

    B. R. Beck, J. A. Becker, P. Beiersdorfer, G. V. Brown, K. J. Moody, J. B. Wilhelmy, F. S. Porter, C. A. Kilbourne, and R. L. Kelley, “Energy Split- ting of the Ground-State Doublet in the Nucleus 229Th,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 142501 (2007)

    2007

  19. [19]

    Table of Experi- mental Nuclear Ground-State Charge Radii: An Update,

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, “Table of Experi- mental Nuclear Ground-State Charge Radii: An Update,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables99, 69–95 (2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    100 Years of Nu- clear Isomers—Then and Now,

    P. M. Walker and Z. Podoly´ ak, “100 Years of Nu- clear Isomers—Then and Now,” Phys. Scr.95, 044004 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Atlas of Nuclear Isomers—Second Edition,

    S. Garg, B. Maheshwari, B. Singh, Y. Sun, A. Goel, and A. K. Jain, “Atlas of Nuclear Isomers—Second Edition,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables150, 101546 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Optical Atomic Clocks,

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, “Optical Atomic Clocks,” Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637–701 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Optical Frequency Combs: Coherently Uniting the Elec- tromagnetic Spectrum,

    S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, “Optical Frequency Combs: Coherently Uniting the Elec- tromagnetic Spectrum,” Science369, eaay3676 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Atomic Clocks for Geodesy,

    T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, G. Grosche, C. Lisdat, P. O. Schmidt, and H. Denker, “Atomic Clocks for Geodesy,” Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 064401 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    (BIPM, S` evres, 2019), updated 2022

    Bureau International des Poids et Mesures,The International System of Units (SI), 9th ed. (BIPM, S` evres, 2019), updated 2022

    2019

  26. [26]

    Decay Chan- nels of the Low-Lying Isomeric State of the 229Th Nucleus and Possibilities for Experimental Investi- gation,

    V. F. Strizhov and E. V. Tkalya, “Decay Chan- nels of the Low-Lying Isomeric State of the 229Th Nucleus and Possibilities for Experimental Investi- gation,” Sov. Phys. JETP72, 387–390 (1991) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.99, 697–704 (1991)]

    1991

  27. [27]

    Processes of the Nuclear Iso- mer 229mTh(3/2+,3.5±1.0 eV): Resonant Excita- tion by Optical Photons,

    E. V. Tkalya, V. O. Varlamov, V. V. Lomonosov, and S. A. Nikulin, “Processes of the Nuclear Iso- mer 229mTh(3/2+,3.5±1.0 eV): Resonant Excita- tion by Optical Photons,” Phys. Scr.53, 296–299 (1996)

    1996

  28. [28]

    Nuclear Laser Spec- troscopy of the 3.5 eV Transition in Th-229,

    E. Peik and Chr. Tamm, “Nuclear Laser Spec- troscopy of the 3.5 eV Transition in Th-229,” Eu- rophys. Lett.61, 181–186 (2003)

    2003

  29. [29]

    Direct Detection of the 229Th Nuclear Clock Transition,

    L. von der Wense, B. Seiferle, M. Laatiaoui, J. B. Neumayr, H. Maier, H. Wirth, C. Mokry, J. Runke, K. Eberhardt, C. E. D¨ ullmann, N. G. Trautmann, and P. G. Thirolf, “Direct Detection of the 229Th Nuclear Clock Transition,” Nature533, 47–51 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Quantum Theory of Non-Local Fields. Part I. Free Fields,

    H. Yukawa, “Quantum Theory of Non-Local Fields. Part I. Free Fields,” Phys. Rev.77, 219– 226 (1950)

    1950

  31. [31]

    Quantum Theory of Non-Local Fields. Part II. Irreducible Fields and Their Inter- action,

    H. Yukawa, “Quantum Theory of Non-Local Fields. Part II. Irreducible Fields and Their Inter- action,” Phys. Rev.80, 1047–1052 (1950)

    1950

  32. [32]

    On Field Theories with Non-Localized Action,

    A. Pais and G. E. Uhlenbeck, “On Field Theories with Non-Localized Action,” Phys. Rev.79, 145– 165 (1950)

    1950

  33. [33]

    Non-Local Quantum Theory of the Scalar Field,

    G. V. Efimov, “Non-Local Quantum Theory of the Scalar Field,” Commun. Math. Phys.5, 42– 56 (1967)

    1967

  34. [34]

    A Proof of the Unitarity of theS-Matrix in a Nonlocal Quan- tum Field Theory,

    V. A. Alebastrov and G. V. Efimov, “A Proof of the Unitarity of theS-Matrix in a Nonlocal Quan- tum Field Theory,” Commun. Math. Phys.31, 1– 24 (1973)

    1973

  35. [35]

    Quantization of Non-Local Field Theory,

    G. V. Efimov, “Quantization of Non-Local Field Theory,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 19–37 (1974)

    1974

  36. [36]

    Causality in Quantum Field Theory with Nonlocal Interac- tion,

    V. A. Alebastrov and G. V. Efimov, “Causality in Quantum Field Theory with Nonlocal Interac- tion,” Commun. Math. Phys.38, 11–28 (1974)

    1974

  37. [37]

    G. V. Efimov,Nonlocal Interactions of Quantized Fields(Nauka, Moscow, 1977)

    1977

  38. [38]

    Nonlocal Gauge Theories,

    N. V. Krasnikov, “Nonlocal Gauge Theories,” Theor. Math. Phys.73, 1184–1190 (1987) [Teor. Mat. Fiz.73, 235–244 (1987)]

    1987

  39. [39]

    Finite Nonlocal Gauge Field The- ory,

    J. W. Moffat, “Finite Nonlocal Gauge Field The- ory,” Phys. Rev. D41, 1177–1184 (1990)

    1990

  40. [40]

    Nonlocal Regularizations of Gauge Theories,

    D. Evens, J. W. Moffat, G. Kleppe, and R. P. Woodard, “Nonlocal Regularizations of Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. D43, 499–519 (1991)

    1991

  41. [41]

    Nonlocal Yang– Mills,

    G. Kleppe and R. P. Woodard, “Nonlocal Yang– Mills,” Nucl. Phys. B388, 81–112 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9203016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  42. [42]

    Ultraviolet Complete Quan- tum Field Theory and Gauge Invariance,

    J. W. Moffat, “Ultraviolet Complete Quan- tum Field Theory and Gauge Invariance,” arXiv:1104.5706 [hep-th] (2011)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Ultraviolet Complete Quantum Gravity,

    J. W. Moffat, “Ultraviolet Complete Quantum Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus126, 43 (2011), arXiv:1008.2482 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Ultraviolet Complete Quan- tum Field Theory and Particle Model,

    J. W. Moffat, “Ultraviolet Complete Quan- tum Field Theory and Particle Model,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus134, 443 (2019), arXiv:1812.01986 [physics.gen-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Finite Quan- tum Field Theory and the Renormalization Group,

    M. A. Green and J. W. Moffat, “Finite Quan- tum Field Theory and the Renormalization Group,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 919 (2021), arXiv:2012.04487 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Towards Singularity- and Ghost- Free Theories of Gravity,

    T. Biswas, E. Gerwick, T. Koivisto, and A. Mazumdar, “Towards Singularity- and Ghost- Free Theories of Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 031101 (2012), arXiv:1110.5249 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Nonlocal and Quasi-Local Field Theories,

    E. T. Tomboulis, “Nonlocal and Quasi-Local Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D92, 125037 (2015), arXiv:1507.00981 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Finite Quantum Gauge Theories,

    L. Modesto, M. Piva, and L. Rachwa l, “Finite Quantum Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. D94, 025021 (2016), arXiv:1506.06227 [hep-th]. 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Nonlocal Quantum Gravity: A Review,

    L. Modesto and L. Rachwa l, “Nonlocal Quantum Gravity: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730020 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    Nonlocal Vertices and Analyticity: Landau Equations and General Cutkosky Rule,

    P. Chin and E. T. Tomboulis, “Nonlocal Vertices and Analyticity: Landau Equations and General Cutkosky Rule,” J. High Energy Phys.06, 014 (2018), arXiv:1803.08899 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Classical Properties of Nonlocal, Ghost- and Singularity-Free Gravity,

    L. Buoninfante, A. S. Koshelev, and A. Mazum- dar, “Classical Properties of Nonlocal, Ghost- and Singularity-Free Gravity,” JCAP09, 034 (2018), arXiv:1802.00399 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Unitar- ity of Minkowski Nonlocal Theories Made Ex- plicit,

    A. S. Koshelev and A. Tokareva, “Unitar- ity of Minkowski Nonlocal Theories Made Ex- plicit,” Phys. Rev. D104, 025016 (2021), arXiv:2103.01945 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    On the Contour Prescriptions in String-Inspired Nonlocal Field Theories,

    L. Buoninfante, “On the Contour Prescriptions in String-Inspired Nonlocal Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D106, 126028 (2022), arXiv:2205.15348 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Introduction to Nonlocal Field Theory Including Gravity,

    N. V. Krasnikov, “Introduction to Nonlocal Field Theory Including Gravity,” Phys. Part. Nucl.55, 1107–1116 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    On Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulators and UV Finiteness in Non-Local Quantum Field The- ory,

    J. W. Moffat and E. J. Thompson, “On Gauge- Invariant Entire-Function Regulators and UV Finiteness in Non-Local Quantum Field The- ory,” Ann. Phys. (Berlin)538, e70207 (2026), doi:10.1002/andp.70207, arXiv:2511.11756 [hep- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    On Covariance for Entire-Function Deformations of Rela- tivistic Field Theories,

    E. J. Thompson, “On Covariance for Entire-Function Deformations of Rela- tivistic Field Theories,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202604.0706.v1

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Model of Boson and Fermion Par- ticle Masses,

    J. W. Moffat, “Model of Boson and Fermion Par- ticle Masses,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus136, 601 (2021), arXiv:2009.10145 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Entanglement,

    R. Landry and J. W. Moffat, “Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Entanglement,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 71 (2024), arXiv:2309.06576 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    On the Limits of a Space- Time Description and the Physical Meaning of Phase Space in a Nonlocal Continuum,

    E. J. Thompson, “On the Limits of a Space- Time Description and the Physical Meaning of Phase Space in a Nonlocal Continuum,” In press Ann. Phys. (Berlin), doi:10.1002/andp.70233, arXiv:2606.27387 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    Asymptotic Micro- causality: Deformations of Local Quan- tum Field Theory,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Micro- causality: Deformations of Local Quan- tum Field Theory,” Preprints (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202601.1874.v1

    arXiv 2026

  61. [62]

    Asymptotic Microcausal- ity to Macrocausality: Complete Quan- tum Electrodynamics and the RegulatedS- Matrix,

    E. J. Thompson, “Asymptotic Microcausal- ity to Macrocausality: Complete Quan- tum Electrodynamics and the RegulatedS- Matrix,” In press Ann. Phys. (Berlin), (2026), doi:10.20944/preprints202602.0207.v1

    arXiv 2026

  62. [63]

    An Inquiry on the Absence of Fermion Doubling and Why the Nielsen–Ninomiya Theorem Does Not Apply to Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory,

    J. W. Moffat, A. Kouroshnia, and E. J. Thompson “An Inquiry on the Absence of Fermion Doubling and Why the Nielsen–Ninomiya Theorem Does Not Apply to Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory,” arXiv:2607.05485 [hep-th] (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [64]

    Uber den anschaulichen In- halt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,

    W. Heisenberg, “Uber den anschaulichen In- halt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Z. Phys.43, 172–198 (1927)

    1927

  64. [65]

    Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,

    E. H. Kennard, “Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,” Z. Phys.44, 326–352 (1927)

    1927

  65. [66]

    The Uncertainty Principle,

    H. P. Robertson, “The Uncertainty Principle,” Phys. Rev.34, 163–164 (1929)

    1929

  66. [67]

    Zum Heisenbergschen Un- sch¨ arfeprinzip,

    E. Schr¨ odinger, “Zum Heisenbergschen Un- sch¨ arfeprinzip,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Phys.-Math. Kl., 296–303 (1930)

    1930

  67. [68]

    Gaussian Quantum Information,

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, “Gaussian Quantum Information,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621–669 (2012)

    2012

  68. [69]

    Quantum In- formation with Continuous Variables,

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, “Quantum In- formation with Continuous Variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513–577 (2005)

    2005

  69. [70]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  70. [71]

    Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellen- mechanik,

    W. Pauli, “Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellen- mechanik,” inHandbuch der Physik, Vol. 24, Part 1, edited by H. Geiger and K. Scheel (Springer, Berlin, 1933), pp. 83–272

    1933

  71. [72]

    The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics,

    L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm, “The Uncertainty Relation Between Energy and Time in Non- relativistic Quantum Mechanics,” J. Phys. USSR 9, 249–254 (1945)

    1945

  72. [73]

    Time in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy,

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Time in the Quantum Theory and the Uncertainty Relation for Time and Energy,” Phys. Rev.122, 1649–1658 (1961)

    1961

  73. [74]

    On the Energy–Time Uncertainty Re- lation. Part I: Dynamical Time and Time Indeter- minacy,

    P. Busch, “On the Energy–Time Uncertainty Re- lation. Part I: Dynamical Time and Time Indeter- minacy,” Found. Phys.20, 1–32 (1990)

    1990

  74. [75]

    On the Energy–Time Uncertainty Re- lation. Part II: Pragmatic Time Versus Energy In- determinacy,

    P. Busch, “On the Energy–Time Uncertainty Re- lation. Part II: Pragmatic Time Versus Energy In- determinacy,” Found. Phys.20, 33–43 (1990)

    1990

  75. [76]

    The Time–Energy Uncertainty Rela- tion,

    P. Busch, “The Time–Energy Uncertainty Rela- tion,” inTime in Quantum Mechanics, edited by J. G. Muga, R. Sala Mayato, and I. L. Egusquiza, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 734 (Springer, Berlin, 2008), pp. 73–105

    2008

  76. [77]

    Quantum Speed Lim- its: From Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle to Optimal Quantum Control,

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, “Quantum Speed Lim- its: From Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle to Optimal Quantum Control,” J. Phys. A50, 453001 (2017)

    2017

  77. [78]

    Con- straining the Evolution of the Fundamental Con- stants with a Solid-State Optical Frequency Ref- erence Based on the 229Th Nucleus,

    W. G. Rellergert, D. DeMille, R. R. Greco, M. P. Hehlen, J. R. Torgerson, and E. R. Hudson, “Con- straining the Evolution of the Fundamental Con- stants with a Solid-State Optical Frequency Ref- erence Based on the 229Th Nucleus,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 200802 (2010)

    2010

  78. [79]

    Performance of a 229Thorium Solid-State Nuclear Clock,

    G. A. Kazakov, A. N. Litvinov, V. I. Romanenko, L. P. Yatsenko, A. V. Romanenko, M. Schreitl, G. Winkler, and T. Schumm, “Performance of a 229Thorium Solid-State Nuclear Clock,” New J. Phys.14, 083019 (2012)

    2012

  79. [80]

    229Thorium-Doped Calcium Fluoride for Nuclear 17 Laser Spectroscopy,

    P. Dessovic, P. Mohn, R. A. Jackson, G. Win- kler, M. Schreitl, G. A. Kazakov, and T. Schumm, “229Thorium-Doped Calcium Fluoride for Nuclear 17 Laser Spectroscopy,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 105402 (2014)

    2014

  80. [81]

    Nuclear Excitation of the 229Th Isomer via Defect States in Doped Crystals,

    B. S. Nickerson, M. Pimon, P. V. Bilous, J. Thielk- ing, M. V. Okhapkin, A. N. Wendt, T. Schumm, E. Peik, and A. P´ alffy, “Nuclear Excitation of the 229Th Isomer via Defect States in Doped Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 032501 (2020)

    2020

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.