Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 119 cited by

Pixtral 12B

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-14 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pixtral-12B outperforms similar and larger open multimodal models by processing images at their native resolution and aspect ratio.

desk verdict Pixtral 12B adds a native-resolution vision encoder and 128K multi-image context to open multimodal models while keeping text performance intact, but the paper stays light on ablations and training details. read the letter →

arxiv 2410.07073 v2 pith:5YPLY3O4 submitted 2024-10-09 cs.CV cs.CL

Pravesh Agrawal , Szymon Antoniak , Emma Bou Hanna , Baptiste Bout , Devendra Chaplot , Jessica Chudnovsky , Diogo Costa , Baudouin De Monicault
show 34 more authors
Saurabh Garg Theophile Gervet Soham Ghosh Amélie Héliou Paul Jacob Albert Q. Jiang Kartik Khandelwal Timothée Lacroix Guillaume Lample Diego Las Casas Thibaut Lavril Teven Le Scao Andy Lo William Marshall Louis Martin Arthur Mensch Pavankumar Muddireddy Valera Nemychnikova Marie Pellat Patrick Von Platen Nikhil Raghuraman Baptiste Rozière Alexandre Sablayrolles Lucile Saulnier Romain Sauvestre Wendy Shang Roman Soletskyi Lawrence Stewart Pierre Stock Joachim Studnia Sandeep Subramanian Sagar Vaze Thomas Wang Sophia Yang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords multimodallanguagemodelvisionencodernativeresolutionimageunderstandingdocumentprocessingopensourcebenchmarkevaluation
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationFoundation.PhiForcing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Pixtral-12B is a 12-billion-parameter model trained to handle both natural images and documents while remaining strong at pure text tasks. It relies on a vision encoder built from scratch that accepts images in their original size and shape rather than forcing fixed crops or downsampling. This design gives users control over how many tokens represent each image and supports any number of images inside a 128,000-token context. The model reports higher scores than other open models of roughly the same size and even beats much larger open models on standard multimodal benchmarks.

What carries the argument

A new vision encoder trained from scratch that ingests images at their natural resolution and aspect ratio, allowing flexible token counts per image.

What would settle it

Re-running the exact same benchmark suite on Pixtral-12B and the compared models using identical prompts, evaluation code, and data splits would show whether the performance gaps persist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Pixtral-12B is a 12-billion-parameter multimodal language model that understands natural images and documents. It achieves leading performance on various multimodal benchmarks, surpassing a number of larger models. Unlike many open-source models, Pixtral is also a cutting-edge text model for its size and does not compromise on natural language performance. Pixtral uses a new vision encoder trained from scratch, which allows it to ingest images at their natural resolution and aspect ratio. This gives users flexibility on the number of tokens used to process an image. Pixtral is also able to process any number of images in its long context window of 128K tokens.

Load-bearing premise

The reported benchmark scores reflect fair, standardized evaluation without undisclosed differences in training data scale, filtering, or test-set contamination.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The model can accept variable numbers of tokens per image depending on content detail.
  • Any number of images can be included inside the 128K context window.
  • Text-only performance remains competitive with dedicated language models of similar size.
  • The contributed MM-MT-Bench and evaluation protocols provide a standardized way to measure practical vision-language capabilities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Native-resolution encoding may reduce artifacts on fine-grained document tasks compared with fixed-resolution encoders.
  • Flexible token budgets per image could lower compute cost for simple scenes while preserving detail where needed.
  • Open release under Apache 2.0 may enable direct fine-tuning on domain-specific image-text pairs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Pixtral-12B, a 12-billion-parameter multimodal language model trained to understand natural images and documents. It features a new vision encoder that ingests images at native resolution and aspect ratio with flexible token counts, supports any number of images within a 128K-token context window, and reports leading results on multimodal benchmarks while preserving strong text-only performance. The work also releases the open MM-MT-Bench for practical vision-language evaluation and provides code for standardized multimodal LLM protocols. Pixtral-12B is claimed to substantially outperform open models of similar size (Llama-3.2 11B, Qwen-2-VL 7B) and even larger models such as Llama-3.2 90B while being 7x smaller.

Significance. If the benchmark comparisons prove reproducible under identical evaluation conditions, the result would be significant: it would demonstrate that architectural choices in the vision encoder and context handling can yield competitive or superior multimodal performance at modest scale, reducing reliance on massive parameter counts. The open release of both the model (Apache 2.0) and the MM-MT-Bench benchmark, together with standardized evaluation code, would further strengthen the contribution by enabling direct community verification and extension.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and evaluation sections: the headline claim that Pixtral-12B outperforms Llama-3.2 90B while 7x smaller rests on direct benchmark comparability, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative details on training-data volume, filtering, test-set overlap, image tokenization, resolution handling, or prompt templates used for all baselines. Without these, the reported gains cannot be confidently attributed to the new vision encoder rather than data or protocol differences.
  2. [Results] Results and experimental setup: no ablation studies, training-recipe details, or error bars are provided for the multimodal benchmark scores. This absence makes it impossible to isolate the contribution of the native-resolution vision encoder or to assess statistical robustness of the cross-model comparisons.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'substanially' is a typographical error and should read 'substantially'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on the Pixtral-12B manuscript. We address each major comment below with clarifications and indicate planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and evaluation sections: the headline claim that Pixtral-12B outperforms Llama-3.2 90B while 7x smaller rests on direct benchmark comparability, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative details on training-data volume, filtering, test-set overlap, image tokenization, resolution handling, or prompt templates used for all baselines. Without these, the reported gains cannot be confidently attributed to the new vision encoder rather than data or protocol differences.

    Authors: We agree that expanded details on evaluation protocols would improve transparency. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative information on our own training data volume, filtering steps, image tokenization strategy, native-resolution handling, and prompt templates used. For the baseline models we followed the officially published benchmark numbers and evaluation protocols from their respective papers and leaderboards. Detailed training-data volumes and filtering for proprietary models such as Llama-3.2 are not publicly disclosed, so we will add an explicit limitations paragraph discussing this constraint and its implications for attribution. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results and experimental setup: no ablation studies, training-recipe details, or error bars are provided for the multimodal benchmark scores. This absence makes it impossible to isolate the contribution of the native-resolution vision encoder or to assess statistical robustness of the cross-model comparisons.

    Authors: We will expand the experimental section and appendix with additional training-recipe details and will report error bars obtained from repeated evaluations on the main benchmark tables. Comprehensive ablations isolating every vision-encoder component were not performed due to compute limits, but we will include a more detailed discussion of the design choices and their expected impact on performance to help readers assess the contribution of native-resolution processing. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative details on training-data volume, filtering, and test-set overlap for all proprietary baseline models (e.g., Llama-3.2), which are not publicly available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: purely empirical benchmark reporting

full rationale

The paper presents Pixtral-12B as an empirical multimodal model release, with all claims consisting of benchmark scores on standard vision-language tasks. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, uniqueness theorems, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the abstract or described content. The central performance assertions rest on external benchmark comparisons rather than any internal reduction to the model's own inputs or prior self-referential results, rendering the evaluation chain self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on large-scale empirical training of a transformer-based multimodal architecture; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are declared in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pixtral 12B." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5YPLY3O4

@misc{pith2026241007073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pixtral 12B},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5YPLY3O4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2410.07073}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce Pixtral-12B, a 12--billion-parameter multimodal language model. Pixtral-12B is trained to understand both natural images and documents, achieving leading performance on various multimodal benchmarks, surpassing a number of larger models. Unlike many open-source models, Pixtral is also a cutting-edge text model for its size, and does not compromise on natural language performance to excel in multimodal tasks. Pixtral uses a new vision encoder trained from scratch, which allows it to ingest images at their natural resolution and aspect ratio. This gives users flexibility on the number of tokens used to process an image. Pixtral is also able to process any number of images in its long context window of 128K tokens. Pixtral 12B substanially outperforms other open models of similar sizes (Llama-3.2 11B \& Qwen-2-VL 7B). It also outperforms much larger open models like Llama-3.2 90B while being 7x smaller. We further contribute an open-source benchmark, MM-MT-Bench, for evaluating vision-language models in practical scenarios, and provide detailed analysis and code for standardized evaluation protocols for multimodal LLMs. Pixtral-12B is released under Apache 2.0 license.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Showing 60 of 119 Pith papers that cite this

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. See all 119 Pith citations

  1. Decodable Is Not Grounded: A Vision-Ablation Arbiter for VLM Spatial Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    A blank-image ablation test reveals that high probe accuracy on VLM spatial reasoning frequently reflects priors or inverted signs rather than image grounding, with horizontal grounded, vertical prior, and depth inverted.

  2. Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2024-09 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Molmo VLMs trained on newly collected PixMo open datasets achieve state-of-the-art performance among open-weight models and surpass multiple proprietary VLMs including Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 Pro.

  3. How China-Origin Vision-Language Models Move from Refusal to Reframing in State Alignment

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chinese-language prompts triple the odds of state-aligned framing in nine tested vision-language models, and across four Qwen generations, explicit refusal falls while fluent reframing rises.

  4. Perception, Verdict, and Evolution: Hindsight-Driven Self-Refining Forensics Agent for AI-Generated Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ForeAgent combines a Perception-Verdict MLLM architecture with hindsight-driven self-refining via sampling-reflection-evolution to reach 82.18% accuracy on Chameleon and 93.3% mean accuracy across 16 generators on AIG...

  5. Boosting Omni-Modal Language Models: Staged Post-Training with Visually Debiased Evaluation

    cs.MM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Visual debiasing of omni-modal benchmarks combined with staged post-training lets a 3B model match or exceed a 30B model without a stronger teacher.

  6. VT-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Visual-Tabular Multi-Modal Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VT-Bench is the first unified benchmark aggregating 14 visual-tabular datasets with over 756K samples and evaluating 23 models to expose challenges in this multi-modal area.

  7. Rule-VLN: Bridging Perception and Compliance via Semantic Reasoning and Geometric Rectification

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Rule-VLN is the first large-scale benchmark injecting 177 regulatory categories into an urban environment, and the proposed SNRM module equips pre-trained VLN agents with zero-shot semantic reasoning and detour planni...

  8. LongTail Driving Scenarios with Reasoning Traces: The KITScenes LongTail Dataset

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    KITScenes LongTail supplies multimodal driving data and multilingual expert reasoning traces to benchmark models on rare scenarios beyond basic safety metrics.

  9. Can Multimodal Foundation Models Understand Schematic Diagrams? An Empirical Study on Information-Seeking QA over Scientific Papers

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MISS-QA, a new benchmark for information-seeking QA over schematic diagrams, shows the best open-source multimodal model at 61.6% accuracy versus 89.0% for human experts.

  10. SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SciVer is the first benchmark for multimodal scientific claim verification over full paper context, and current foundation models score about 16 points below expert humans.

  11. DocReRank: Single-Page Hard Negative Query Generation for Training Multi-Modal RAG Rerankers

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Training a reranker on VLM-verified hard negative queries, generated per page from LLM rephrasings of positive queries, outperforms training on document-level hard negatives in multimodal RAG retrieval.

  12. OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning

    cs.CV 2024-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    OCRBench v2 is a new benchmark with four times more tasks than prior versions that reveals most large multimodal models score below 50 out of 100 on visual text tasks and share five specific weaknesses.

  13. Instruction-based Image Manipulation by Watching How Things Move

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A diffusion editing model, InstructMove, is trained on video frame pairs annotated by MLLMs using spatial conditioning, enabling non-rigid edits and viewpoint changes.

  14. VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Models

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    VL-RewardBench curates 1,250 hard preference pairs for vision-language reward models; GPT-4o reaches only 62 to 65 percent accuracy, and benchmark scores correlate strongly with Best-of-N gains on MMMU-Pro.

  15. DeepBias: Adaptive In-depth Probing of Social Biases in LVLMs

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A generation-evolution-probing loop with Proposer and Digger agents produces DeepBiasBench, exposing deeper LVLM social biases than static image-question benchmarks.

  16. HUGIN: Enhancing Vision-Language Planning for Autonomous Logistics Sorting

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HUGIN, a training framework combining fact-recombination augmentation and global-context ranking, raises sorting-plan accuracy on SortingBench, improving Qwen3-VL-8B from 63.6% to 78.8%.

  17. XL-DocBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Extra-Long Document Understanding

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XL-DocBench is a 1,519-question, fully human-verified extra-long document QA benchmark across six professional domains; state-of-the-art systems still score at most 44% on it.

  18. Groc-PO: Grounded Context Preference Optimization for Truthful Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Groc-PO applies preference optimization at three grounded stages — object grounding, contextual grounding, grounded reasoning — and outperforms final-answer-only DPO on hallucination and complex-reasoning benchmarks.

  19. SADL: What to Ignore? A Benchmark for Subject-Aware Distractor Localization

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SADL introduces the first real-world benchmark for subject-aware distractor localization with 1,800 cases and evaluates VLMs showing they over-exclude objects.

  20. GAVEL: Grounded Caption Error Verification and Localization

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    GAVEL introduces a joint task, dataset, and benchmark for verifying, explaining, and localizing caption-image misalignments, with a supervised baseline that improves grounding and explanation metrics over strong close...

  21. Qwen-RobotWorld Technical Report: Unifying Embodied World Modeling through Language-Conditioned Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Qwen-RobotWorld is a language-conditioned video world model using Double-Stream MMDiT, an 8.6M-frame embodied corpus, and progressive curriculum training that ranks first on EWMBench and DreamGen Bench.

  22. Chart Deception in Vision-Language Models: From Vulnerability to Mitigation

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Misleading chart designs shift vision-language models' answers away from the true data interpretation; a paired benchmark measures this shift, and a model-extracted chart summary reduces it for most models.

  23. DREAM-S: Speculative Decoding with Searchable Drafting and Target-Aware Refinement for Multimodal Generation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DREAM-S combines neural architecture search, target-aware supernet training, and attention-entropy-guided distillation to accelerate speculative decoding in VLMs, reporting up to 3.85x speedup over standard methods.

  24. Unlocking Dense Metric Depth Estimation in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DepthVLM converts a standard VLM into a dense metric depth predictor by attaching a lightweight head and training under unified vision-text supervision, outperforming prior VLMs and some pure vision models on a new in...

  25. BareBones: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Geometric Comprehension in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLMs exhibit a consistent 'Texture Bias Cliff' and fail to comprehend pure geometric shapes from boundary contours alone in zero-shot settings.

  26. Learning Structured Robot Policies from Vision-Language Models via Synthetic Neuro-Symbolic Supervision

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models generate executable Behavior Tree policies for robots from synthetic vision-language data, with successful transfer demonstrated on two real manipulators.

  27. To See or To Please: Uncovering Visual Sycophancy and Split Beliefs in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 9 VLMs and 9,000 pairs, 72.9% of cases show Visual Sycophancy (split beliefs: vision preserved, wrong answer decoded), zero show robust refusal, and scale worsens the pattern while cutting language shortcuts.

  28. PRPO: Paragraph-level Policy Optimization for Vision-Language Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PRPO is a paragraph-level policy optimization technique that grounds vision-language model reasoning in image content to raise deepfake detection accuracy and reasoning quality.

  29. Measuring Epistemic Humility in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 22,831-question visual benchmark shows that major multimodal LLMs struggle to reject false answer options, often scoring near random when abstaining is the only correct response.

  30. SEAM: Semantically Equivalent Across Modalities Benchmark for Vision-Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SEAM measures VLM reasoning consistency across modalities using paired semantically equivalent textual and visual notations, and finds systematic vision-language imbalance.

  31. WebMMU: A Benchmark for Multimodal Multilingual Website Understanding and Code Generation

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WebMMU introduces a multilingual, three-task benchmark for website understanding and code generation, and finds current MLLMs underperform on reasoning, grounding, and functional code editing.

  32. VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLM4D benchmarks spatiotemporal reasoning in VLMs and finds large gaps versus humans, with proposed methods showing partial improvement.

  33. "Harmless to You, Hurtful to Me!": Investigating the Detection of Toxic Languages Grounded in the Perspective of Youth

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors construct the first Chinese youth-toxicity dataset, show that youth and adult perceptions of toxic language diverge, and report that adding contextual meta information improves detection accuracy.

  34. EMIT: Enhancing MLLMs for Industrial Anomaly Detection via Difficulty-Aware GRPO

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A difficulty-aware GRPO training scheme with response resampling, advantage reweighting, GPT-generated text samples, and heatmap-guided contrastive embeddings improves InternVL3-8B by 7.77 percentage points on the MMA...

  35. Document Haystack: A Long Context Multimodal Image/Document Understanding Vision LLM Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 400-document, 8,250-question benchmark measures how well vision-language models retrieve hidden text and image facts from long documents.

  36. MMHU: A Massive-Scale Multimodal Benchmark for Human Behavior Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMHU introduces a large-scale multimodal benchmark with 57k human instances and rich annotations for motion, trajectory, text, behavior labels, and VQA in driving scenes.

  37. VIP: Visual Information Protection through Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Models

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A perturbation computed from early attention and value matrices can make LLaVA, Instruct-BLIP, and BLIP2-T5 fail to detect objects inside a specified image region while keeping the rest of the image usable.

  38. Beyond Simple Edits: X-Planner for Complex Instruction-Based Image Editing

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    X-Planner, an MLLM-based planner, decomposes complex image-editing instructions into localized sub-edits with masks and boxes, improving editing quality on standard and new complex benchmarks.

  39. IR3D-Bench: Evaluating Vision-Language Model Scene Understanding as Agentic Inverse Rendering

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmark that scores vision-language models by reconstructing the 3D scene behind an image as executable Blender code finds the models fail mainly on spatial precision, not tool usage.

  40. CARMA: Context-Aware Situational Grounding of Human-Robot Group Interactions by Combining Vision-Language Models with Object and Action Recognition

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CARMA combines object detection, person tracking, action detection, and a vision-language model to produce instance-level actor-action-object triplets for human-robot group interactions, achieving up to 72% task succe...

  41. MrM: Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks against Multimodal RAG Systems

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MrM is a black-box membership inference attack on multimodal RAG systems that masks key objects in a target image and uses the system's ability to reconstruct them as a membership signal.

  42. SparseMM: Head Sparsity Emerges from Visual Concept Responses in MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SparseMM shows that under 5% of attention heads carry visual understanding in MLLMs and uses OCR-derived head scores to allocate KV-cache budgets asymmetrically, preserving accuracy at low cache sizes.

  43. Rex-Thinker: Grounded Object Referring via Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a multimodal LLM on GPT-4o-generated chain-of-thought referring traces, then optimizing with GRPO, improves referring accuracy and abstention on HumanRef.

  44. MLA-Trust: Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal LLM Agents in GUI Environments

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MLA-Trust introduces 34 tasks and an evaluation toolbox showing that GUI-interacting multimodal agents are substantially less trustworthy than static multimodal chat models.

  45. Affordance Benchmark for MLLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 2,000-question benchmark finds multimodal AI models recognize object affordances far worse than humans, with top model Gemini-2.0-Pro at 18.05% versus 85.34% human best.

  46. ChartGen: Scaling Chart Understanding Via Code-Guided Synthetic Chart Generation

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fully automated pipeline generates a 222.5K-pair synthetic chart dataset with 27 chart types and 11 plotting libraries, and a GPT-4o-judged benchmark shows current open-weights VLMs still underperform on chart-to-co...

  47. Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Agent-X, a new 828-task benchmark with step-level scoring, finds that the best multimodal agents still fail over half of real-world visual tool-use tasks.

  48. AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An agent-driven framework adaptively selects a small subset of benchmark questions for MLLMs, preserving over 90% ranking accuracy with roughly 4-5% of the data.

  49. A Stereotype Content Analysis on Color-related Social Bias in Large Vision Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eight vision-language models show consistent color-linked stereotypes in competence and warmth, measured with a new SCM-based projection metric on a color-controlled image benchmark.

  50. VisualToolAgent (VisTA): A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Visual Tool Selection

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VisTA uses GRPO reinforcement learning to train a vision-language agent to select external visual tools for a frozen reasoning model, improving accuracy on ChartQA, Geometry3K, BlindTest, and MathVerse.

  51. Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current vision-language models are largely miscalibrated when they verbalize confidence, visual reasoning models such as o3 and o4-mini are better calibrated, and Visual Confidence-Aware Prompting reduces ECE on IsoBench.

  52. ReadBench: Measuring the Dense Text Visual Reading Ability of Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark converts text-only QA datasets into text images and shows that vision-language models degrade sharply on long visually presented contexts.

  53. STAR-R1: Spatial TrAnsformation Reasoning by Reinforcing Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    STAR-R1 uses single-stage reinforcement learning with fine-grained rewards to improve spatial transformation reasoning in multimodal LLMs, outperforming supervised fine-tuning on cross-view TVR tasks.

  54. Mogao: An Omni Foundation Model for Interleaved Multi-Modal Generation

    cs.CV 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Mogao presents a causal unified model with deep fusion, dual encoders, and interleaved position embeddings that achieves strong performance on multi-modal understanding, text-to-image generation, and coherent interlea...

  55. RESAnything: Attribute Prompting for Arbitrary Referring Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A zero-shot referring expression segmentation method that uses attribute prompting to reason about object parts and implicit descriptions, outperforming prior zero-shot and several fine-tuned baselines.

  56. Robotic Task Ambiguity Resolution via Natural Language Interaction

    cs.RO 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned vision-language model can detect ambiguous robot commands, ask for clarification, and resolve the ambiguity enough to boost real-robot manipulation success from 69.6% to 97.1%.

  57. MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignment

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A human-annotated multimodal preference dataset plus critique-based reward modeling and reward-margin-weighted DPO improves MLLM performance across many benchmarks.

  58. Granite Vision: a lightweight, open-source multimodal model for enterprise Intelligence

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Granite Vision is a ~3B parameter open-weights vision-language model that reaches state-of-the-art scores on document understanding benchmarks despite its small size.

  59. ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZeroBench is a hand-built 100-question visual reasoning benchmark, adversarially filtered so every evaluated frontier LMM scored 0% at release.

  60. UniCoRN: Unified Commented Retrieval Network with LMMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A frozen multimodal LLM is extended with a retrieval adapter and an entity adapter to retrieve a relevant image and generate a supportive textual comment.

See all 119 Pith citations

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 119 Pith papers (see all)

  1. [1]

    The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku

    Anthropic (2024). The Claude 3 Model Family: Opus, Sonnet, Haiku. https: //www-cdn.anthropic.com/de8ba9b01c9ab7cbabf5c33b80b7bbc618857627/Model_ Card_Claude_3.pdf

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Bavishi, R., Elsen, E., Hawthorne, C., Nye, M., Odena, A., Somani, A., and Ta¸ sırlar, S. (2023). Fuyu-8b: A multimodal architecture for ai agents

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    M., et al

    Dehghani, M., Mustafa, B., Djolonga, J., Heek, J., Minderer, M., Caron, M., Steiner, A., Puigcerver, J., Geirhos, R., Alabdulmohsin, I. M., et al. (2024). Patch n’pack: Navit, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models

    Deitke, M., Clark, C., Lee, S., Tripathi, R., Yang, Y ., Park, J. S., Salehi, M., Muennighoff, N., Lo, K., Soldaini, L., et al. (2024). Molmo and pixmo: Open weights and open data for state-of-the-art multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17146

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Dosovitskiy, A. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Yang, A., Fan, A., et al. (2024). The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Kadavath, S., Arora, A., Basart, S., Tang, E., Song, D., and Steinhardt, J. (2021). Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03874

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)

    Hendrycks, D. and Gimpel, K. (2016). Gaussian error linear units (gelus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Li, B., Zhang, Y ., Guo, D., Zhang, R., Li, F., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Li, Y ., Liu, Z., and Li, C. (2024). Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Li, X., Wang, Z., and Xie, C. (2023). An inverse scaling law for clip training. In NeurIPS

    2023

  3. [11]

    and Harada, T

    Li, Y . and Harada, T. (2022). Lepard: Learning partial point cloud matching in rigid and deformable scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5554–5564

    2022

  4. [12]

    Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y ., and Lee, Y . J. (2024a). Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 26296–26306

  5. [13]

    Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q., and Lee, Y . J. (2024b). Visual instruction tuning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 36

  6. [14]

    Lu, P., Bansal, H., Xia, T., Liu, J., Li, C., Hajishirzi, H., Cheng, H., Chang, K.-W., Galley, M., and Gao, J. (2023). Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02255

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Mistral NeMo 12B

    MistralAI (2024). Mistral NeMo 12B. https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-nemo/

    2024

  8. [16]

    OpenAI, R. et al. (2023). Gpt-4 technical report. ArXiv, 2303:08774

    2023

  9. [17]

    W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al

    Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning , pages 8748–8763. PMLR

    2021

  10. [18]

    Reid, M., Savinov, N., Teplyashin, D., Lepikhin, D., Lillicrap, T., Alayrac, J.-b., Soricut, R., Lazaridou, A., Firat, O., Schrittwieser, J., et al. (2024). Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Shazeer, N. (2020). Glu variants improve transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05202. 16

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Su, J., Ahmed, M., Lu, Y ., Pan, S., Bo, W., and Liu, Y . (2024). Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Neurocomputing, 568:127063

    2024

  13. [21]

    Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023). Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30

    2017

  15. [23]

    Wang, P., Bai, S., Tan, S., Wang, S., Fan, Z., Bai, J., Chen, K., Liu, X., Wang, J., Ge, W., Fan, Y ., Dang, K., Du, M., Ren, X., Men, R., Liu, D., Zhou, C., Zhou, J., and Lin, J. (2024). Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution

    2024

  16. [24]

    Yue, X., Ni, Y ., Zhang, K., Zheng, T., Liu, R., Zhang, G., Stevens, S., Jiang, D., Ren, W., Sun, Y ., et al. (2023). Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. arxiv

    2023

  17. [25]

    Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y ., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y ., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E., et al. (2023). Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:46595–46623

    2023

  18. [26]

    [[rating]]

    Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y ., Liang, Y ., Lu, S., Wang, Y ., Saied, A., Chen, W., and Duan, N. (2023). Agieval: A human-centric benchmark for evaluating foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06364. 17 Appendix Table of Contents A Prompts 19 A.1 MMMU and Mathvista . . . ...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed May 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.