Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Reasoning and Tools for Human-Level Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12036 v2 pith:C7XFUXW2 submitted 2024-08-21 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords forecastingtoolsdatareasoningtrainingcompetitivemodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) trained on web-scale datasets are largely successful due to their ability to memorize large amounts of training data, even if only present in a few examples. These capabilities are often desirable in evaluation on tasks such as question answering but raise questions about whether these models can exhibit genuine reasoning or succeed only at mimicking patterns from the training data. This distinction is particularly salient in forecasting tasks, where the answer is not present in the training data, and the model must reason to make logical deductions. We present Reasoning and Tools for Forecasting (RTF), a framework of reasoning-and-acting (ReAct) agents that can dynamically retrieve updated information and run numerical simulation with equipped tools. We evaluate our model with questions from competitive forecasting platforms and demonstrate that our method is competitive with and can outperform human predictions. This suggests that LMs, with the right tools, can indeed think and adapt like humans, offering valuable insights for real-world decision-making.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    BLF achieves state-of-the-art binary forecasting on ForecastBench by using linguistic belief states updated in tool-use loops, hierarchical multi-trial logit averaging, and hierarchical Platt scaling calibration.

  2. Bench to the Future: A Pastcasting Benchmark for Forecasting Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bench to the Future is a pastcasting benchmark: 299 already-resolved forecasting questions, each paired with a frozen corpus of about 20,000 web pages, on which newer LLMs and agentic search score better.

  3. Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters

    cs.LG 2025-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic critique showing temporal leakage and extrapolation flaws can undermine claims that LLM forecasters match or beat humans.

Pith tools