REVIEW 3 cited by
Reasoning and Tools for Human-Level Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Language models (LMs) trained on web-scale datasets are largely successful due to their ability to memorize large amounts of training data, even if only present in a few examples. These capabilities are often desirable in evaluation on tasks such as question answering but raise questions about whether these models can exhibit genuine reasoning or succeed only at mimicking patterns from the training data. This distinction is particularly salient in forecasting tasks, where the answer is not present in the training data, and the model must reason to make logical deductions. We present Reasoning and Tools for Forecasting (RTF), a framework of reasoning-and-acting (ReAct) agents that can dynamically retrieve updated information and run numerical simulation with equipped tools. We evaluate our model with questions from competitive forecasting platforms and demonstrate that our method is competitive with and can outperform human predictions. This suggests that LMs, with the right tools, can indeed think and adapt like humans, offering valuable insights for real-world decision-making.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs
BLF achieves state-of-the-art binary forecasting on ForecastBench by using linguistic belief states updated in tool-use loops, hierarchical multi-trial logit averaging, and hierarchical Platt scaling calibration.
-
Bench to the Future: A Pastcasting Benchmark for Forecasting Agents
Bench to the Future is a pastcasting benchmark: 299 already-resolved forecasting questions, each paired with a frozen corpus of about 20,000 web pages, on which newer LLMs and agentic search score better.
-
Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters
A systematic critique showing temporal leakage and extrapolation flaws can undermine claims that LLM forecasters match or beat humans.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.