pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19197 · v2 · pith:HGPKE4ZUnew · submitted 2026-04-21 · ✦ hep-ph

CP-violating multi-field phase transitions and gravitational waves in a hidden NJL sector

Chang-Xin Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 17:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords first-order phase transitiongravitational wavesNJL modelCP violationhidden sectormulti-field tunnelingstochastic background
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a hidden NJL sector, multi-field tunneling can slow phase transitions to β/H ~ O(100) and produce gravitational waves detectable by μAres.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies first-order phase transitions in a hidden strongly coupled sector described by an extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with three fermion flavors, a CP-violating six-fermion interaction, and an explicit chiral symmetry breaking term. Instead of the usual single-field approximation, the authors track the full multi-field tunneling path through the effective potential and scan the multi-dimensional parameter space. They identify a regime in which the transition rate drops sharply compared with conventional NJL results. This slowdown increases the amplitude of the stochastic gravitational wave background enough to reach the projected sensitivity of the proposed μAres observatory. The macroscopic wave properties turn out to be fixed almost entirely by the radial shape of the potential and remain insensitive to the CP-violating angle.

Core claim

A comprehensive scan of the multi-dimensional parameter space of the extended NJL model reveals a regime where the transition rate drops to β/H ∼ O(10^2). Consequently the peak amplitude of the stochastic gravitational wave background reaches the detection sensitivity of μAres, while the macroscopic thermodynamic properties that set the wave spectrum are determined by the radial profile of the effective potential and stay insensitive to the CP-violating topological vacuum angle.

What carries the argument

The curved multi-field tunneling path through the effective potential that arises from the interplay between explicit chiral symmetry breaking and the CP-violating six-fermion interaction.

If this is right

  • The slower transition rate increases the energy released into gravitational waves from bubble wall collisions and sound waves.
  • The explicit mass term biases the vacua and forces transient domain walls to collapse promptly, preserving cosmological viability.
  • Because wave observables depend mainly on the radial potential, predictions for future detectors can be made without precise knowledge of the CP angle.
  • The same multi-field mechanism can be applied to other hidden-sector models to search for additional slow-transition regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spatially varying CP-violating background inside the bubble wall could source additional effects such as baryon asymmetry, an avenue left open by the present analysis.
  • If lattice simulations of the NJL model confirm the mean-field tunneling rates, the predicted μAres signals become more robust targets for observation.
  • The insensitivity to the CP angle suggests that similar hidden-sector models without CP violation may still produce detectable waves if the radial potential is comparably flat.

Load-bearing premise

The effective potential and the multi-field tunneling path are accurately described by the mean-field or large-N approximation of the NJL model.

What would settle it

A calculation of the bubble nucleation rate that includes higher-order corrections or lattice methods and yields β/H ≫ 100 for the same parameter region would eliminate the claimed enhancement of the gravitational wave amplitude.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19197 by Chang-Xin Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic representation of the effective potential structure in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Effect of explicit chiral symmetry breaking on the effective potential. (a, c) Chiral limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Evolution of the effective potential in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Quantitative evolution of vacuum energies and corresponding cross-sectional profiles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Radial bubble profiles and the potential mapping for the NJL model. The fixed parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The temperature dependence of the normalized three-dimensional Euclidean action [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The temperature dependence of the normalized tunneling action [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Parameter scan results of the viable parameter space yielding a FOPT. Panel (a) illustrates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Predicted SGWB spectra Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the dynamics of a cosmological first-order phase transition (FOPT) and the associated stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB) in a hidden strongly coupled sector described by an extended Nambu--Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model with $N_f = 3$ fermion flavors. The model incorporates a CP-violating six-fermion 't Hooft interaction, an explicit chiral symmetry breaking mass term, and chirally symmetric eight-fermion operators that stabilize the vacuum. We perform a multi-field analysis of the tunneling dynamics, going beyond conventional single-field approximations. The interplay between explicit symmetry breaking and CP violation induces a vacuum misalignment, resulting in a curved tunneling path and a spatially varying CP-violating background across the bubble wall. Through a comprehensive scan of the multi-dimensional parameter space, we find a parameter regime where the conventionally rapid transition rate of the NJL framework is drastically reduced to $\beta/H \sim \mathcal{O}(10^2)$. Consequently, the gravitational wave (GW) production is significantly enhanced, with the predicted SGWB peak amplitudes successfully reaching the detection sensitivity of the proposed $\mu$Ares observatory. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that the macroscopic thermodynamic properties governing the SGWB are predominantly determined by the radial profile of the effective potential, rendering the resulting GW signatures remarkably insensitive to the CP-violating topological vacuum angle. Finally, the explicit symmetry breaking mass introduces a crucial energy bias between competing vacua, triggering the prompt collapse of transient domain wall configurations and thereby ensuring the cosmological viability of the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper examines first-order phase transitions in an extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with three fermion flavors, including CP-violating six-fermion interactions and stabilizing eight-fermion operators. It conducts a multi-field analysis of the tunneling dynamics, identifying through parameter scans a regime with reduced transition rate β/H ∼ O(10^2) that enhances the stochastic gravitational wave background to levels detectable by μAres. The analysis concludes that GW properties are set by the radial effective potential and are insensitive to the CP-violating angle, while explicit symmetry breaking ensures domain wall collapse for cosmological viability.

Significance. If the numerical results hold under the model's approximations, this work would significantly contribute to understanding how multi-field and CP-violating effects in strongly coupled hidden sectors can produce observable gravitational wave signals from slower phase transitions. It highlights the potential for such models to be probed by future detectors like μAres and provides insight into the dominance of radial potentials in determining macroscopic GW features.

major comments (2)
  1. The reported reduction to β/H ∼ O(10^2) and the resulting GW enhancement are obtained from a comprehensive scan, yet the abstract and summary provide no explicit derivation of the effective potential, error estimates, or validation against single-field limits, which is necessary to confirm the slow-transition regime.
  2. The effective potential and multi-field bounce are computed in the mean-field/large-N approximation of the NJL model with N_f=3. Since the model is not parametrically large-N, 1/N corrections or non-perturbative effects may shift the barrier height and the curvature of the CP-induced tunneling path, potentially increasing β/H and altering the GW amplitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The reported reduction to β/H ∼ O(10^2) and the resulting GW enhancement are obtained from a comprehensive scan, yet the abstract and summary provide no explicit derivation of the effective potential, error estimates, or validation against single-field limits, which is necessary to confirm the slow-transition regime.

    Authors: We agree that additional technical details would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will expand Section II to include an explicit derivation of the multi-field effective potential, report numerical error estimates obtained from the parameter scan, and add a direct comparison of the multi-field bounce solutions to the corresponding single-field limits in order to substantiate the origin of the slow-transition regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The effective potential and multi-field bounce are computed in the mean-field/large-N approximation of the NJL model with N_f=3. Since the model is not parametrically large-N, 1/N corrections or non-perturbative effects may shift the barrier height and the curvature of the CP-induced tunneling path, potentially increasing β/H and altering the GW amplitudes.

    Authors: We acknowledge that N_f=3 lies outside the strict large-N limit. The mean-field treatment is nevertheless the standard controlled approximation used to capture the non-perturbative dynamics of the NJL model, and the reduction of β/H arises principally from the geometry of the multi-field tunneling path rather than from fine details of the barrier height. We will add a paragraph in the discussion section addressing the expected size of 1/N corrections and the robustness of the qualitative GW enhancement under these corrections. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation or results

full rationale

The paper computes the effective potential in the mean-field/large-N NJL approximation, extracts the multi-field bounce action along the curved tunneling path, and performs a numerical scan over model parameters to identify regimes with β/H ∼ O(10^2) and enhanced SGWB amplitudes. These outputs are not equivalent to the inputs by construction; the scan explores the model's behavior rather than renaming or refitting a quantity already fixed by the potential definition. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described chain. The claimed insensitivity of macroscopic GW properties to the CP angle follows directly from the radial dominance in the potential, which is an independent computational result. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as standard bounce solvers and GW spectrum formulas.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the mean-field NJL effective potential, the existence of a first-order transition for the chosen parameters, and the numerical reliability of the multi-field bounce calculation; no independent evidence for these is supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (3)
  • six-fermion coupling strength
    Determines the size of CP violation and vacuum misalignment; its value is scanned to locate the slow-transition window.
  • explicit chiral-breaking mass
    Sets the energy bias between vacua and controls domain-wall collapse; fitted or chosen to ensure cosmological viability.
  • eight-fermion operator coefficients
    Stabilize the potential; their magnitudes are part of the multi-dimensional scan.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The NJL model with the listed operators provides a reliable effective description of the hidden sector dynamics at the relevant energy scale.
    Invoked when the effective potential and tunneling path are computed from the Lagrangian.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher-order corrections beyond the mean-field or large-N limit do not qualitatively alter the barrier or the multi-field trajectory.
    Implicit in the use of the extended NJL potential for quantitative predictions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1716 out tokens · 41499 ms · 2026-05-19T17:44:50.881696+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 56 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Witten, Phys

    E. Witten, Phys. Rev. D30, 272 (1984)

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions at the Electroweak Scale and Beyond

    C. Grojean and G. Servant, Phys. Rev. D75, 043507 (2007), hep-ph/0607107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  3. [3]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini et al., JCAP04, 001 (2016), 1512.06239

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], 1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rept.67, 183 (1980)

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Auclair et al

    P. Auclair et al. (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Living Rev. Rel.26, 5 (2023), 2204.05434

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA) (2017), 1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 105011 (2019), 1803.01944

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro- Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), 1703.09722

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    P. A. Seoane et al. (LISA), Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), 2203.06016

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpi et al. (LISA) (2024), 2402.07571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luo et al. (TianQin), Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), 1512.02076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Detecting the Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background with the Big Bang Observer

    V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 2435 (2006), gr-qc/0512039. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Beyond LISA: Exploring Future Gravitational Wave Missions

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish, Phys. Rev. D72, 083005 (2005), gr-qc/0506015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 221103 (2001), astro- ph/0108011

    work page arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO

    S. Kawamura et al., PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), 2006.13545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev.122, 345 (1961)

    work page 1961

  19. [19]

    Nambu and G

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev.124, 246 (1961)

    work page 1961

  20. [20]

    Vogl and W

    U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.27, 195 (1991)

    work page 1991

  21. [21]

    L. Wang, Y. Jiang, L. He, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D100, 114009 (2019), 1901.04697

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    A. A. Osipov, B. Hiller, and A. H. Blin, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.8, 183 (2015), 1411.2137

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Christian, I

    J.-E. Christian, I. A. Rather, H. Gholami, and M. Hofmann, Astron. Astrophys.701, A145 (2025), 2503.13626

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    The Problem of Matter Stability in the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio Model

    M. Buballa, Nucl. Phys. A611, 393 (1996), nucl-th/9609044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  25. [25]

    The QCD critical end point in the PNJL model

    P. Costa, C. A. de Sousa, M. C. Ruivo, and H. Hansen, EPL86, 31001 (2009), 0801.3616

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    T. Xia, L. He, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D88, 056013 (2013), 1307.4622

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Entanglement between deconfinement transition and chiral symmetry restoration

    Y. Sakai, T. Sasaki, H. Kouno, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D82, 076003 (2010), 1006.3648

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Critical endpoint in the Polyakov-loop extended NJL model

    K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B662, 26 (2008), 0710.2180

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop

    K. Fukushima, Phys. Lett. B591, 277 (2004), hep-ph/0310121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    A. J. Helmboldt, J. Kubo, and S. van der Woude, Phys. Rev. D100, 055025 (2019), 1904.07891

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Gravitational Waves From a Dark (Twin) Phase Transition

    P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 181101 (2015), 1504.07263

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Zhao and Z

    R. Zhao and Z. Zhang (2026), 2603.07739

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    A. D. Sakharov, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32 (1967)

    work page 1967

  34. [34]

    D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, New J. Phys.14, 125003 (2012), 1206.2942

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, and A. E. Nelson, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43, 27 (1993), hep-ph/9302210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  36. [36]

    P. L. Cho, Phys. Rev. D48, 3304 (1993), hep-ph/9212274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  37. [37]

    R. J. Crewther, P. Di Vecchia, G. Veneziano, and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B88, 123 (1979), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 91, 487 (1980)]

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    Pich and E

    A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B367, 313 (1991)

    work page 1991

  39. [39]

    Spontaneous CP-violation in the strong interaction at theta = pi

    D. Boer and J. K. Boomsma, Phys. Rev. D78, 054027 (2008), 0806.1669

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    J. K. Boomsma and D. Boer, PoSCONFINEMENT8, 134 (2008), 0812.3077. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Chiral phase transition in an extended NJL model with higher-order multi-quark interactions

    K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, T. Sakaguchi, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett. B647, 446 (2007), nucl-th/0608078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    A. A. Osipov, B. Hiller, A. H. Blin, and J. da Providencia, Annals Phys.322, 2021 (2007), hep-ph/0607066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    A. A. Osipov, B. Hiller, J. Moreira, A. H. Blin, and J. da Providencia, Phys. Lett. B646, 91 (2007), hep-ph/0612082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [44]

    Asakawa and K

    M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A504, 668 (1989)

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4816 (1998), hep- ph/9806219

    work page arXiv 1998

  46. [46]

    C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Schmidt, and L. Scorzato, Phys. Rev. D66, 074507 (2002), hep-lat/0204010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    M. A. Stephanov, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.153, 139 (2004), hep-ph/0402115

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Phases of QCD: lattice thermodynamics and a field theoretical model

    C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D73, 014019 (2006), hep-ph/0506234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Phase diagram and thermodynamics of the PNJL model

    C. Ratti, M. A. Thaler, and W. Weise (2006), nucl-th/0604025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    Coupling of pion condensate, chiral condensate and Polyakov loop in an extended NJL model

    Z. Zhang and Y.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. C75, 064910 (2007), hep-ph/0610221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    S. K. Ghosh, T. K. Mukherjee, M. G. Mustafa, and R. Ray, Phys. Rev. D73, 114007 (2006), hep-ph/0603050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Gao and I

    F. Gao and I. M. Oldengott, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 131301 (2022), 2106.11991

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  54. [54]

    Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67, 3 (1974)

    work page 1974

  55. [55]

    A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls

    K. Saikawa, Universe3, 40 (2017), 1703.02576

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, JCAP02, 031 (2014), 1309.5001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Gravitational Waves from Collapsing Domain Walls

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, JCAP05, 032 (2010), 1002.1555

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Gravitational Waves from Collapsing Vacuum Domains

    M. Gleiser and R. Roberts, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5497 (1998), astro-ph/9807260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    Garc´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini, and´O. Zapata, Phys. Rev. D111, 063044 (2025), 2405.10367

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Kang and J

    Z. Kang and J. Zhu, JHEP09, 005 (2025), 2501.15242

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), hep-ph/0404175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  62. [62]

    G. D. Kribs and E. T. Neil, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31, 1643004 (2016), 1604.04627

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 649 (1992)

    work page 1992

  64. [64]

    QCD Phenomenology based on a Chiral Effective Lagrangian

    T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rept.247, 221 (1994), hep-ph/9401310

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  65. [65]

    ’t Hooft, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett.37, 8 (1976). 26

    work page 1976

  66. [66]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys.44, 1422 (1970)

    work page 1970

  67. [67]

    Nonuniform phases in a three-flavor Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model

    J. Moreira, B. Hiller, W. Broniowski, A. A. Osipov, and A. H. Blin, Phys. Rev. D89, 036009 (2014), 1312.4942

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Impact of eight quark interactions on chiral phase transitions II: Thermal effects

    B. Hiller, A. A. Osipov, J. Moreira, and A. H. Blin, in13th International Conference on Selected Problems of Modern Theoretical Physics (SPMTP 08): Dedicated to the 100th An- niversary of the Birth of D.I. Blokhintsev (1908-1979)(2008), 0809.2515

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  69. [69]

    Eguchi, Phys

    T. Eguchi, Phys. Rev. D14, 2755 (1976)

    work page 1976

  70. [70]

    Hubbard, Phys

    J. Hubbard, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 77 (1959)

    work page 1959

  71. [71]

    A. A. Osipov, B. Hiller, V. Bernard, and A. H. Blin, Annals Phys.321, 2504 (2006), hep- ph/0507226

    work page arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 1888 (1973)

    work page 1973

  73. [73]

    A. D. Linde, Nucl. Phys. B216, 421 (1983), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 223, 544 (1983)]

    work page 1983

  74. [74]

    S. R. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    work page 1977

  75. [75]

    Brdar, M

    V. Brdar, M. Finetti, M. Matteini, A. P. Morais, and M. Nemevˇ sek (2025), 2505.04744

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D23, 876 (1981)

    work page 1981

  77. [77]

    Gravitational waves from the electroweak phase transition

    L. Leitao, A. Megevand, and A. D. Sanchez, JCAP10, 024 (2012), 1205.3070

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [78]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    C. Caprini et al., JCAP03, 024 (2020), 1910.13125

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24, 1 (2021), 2008.09136

    work page arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, vol. 69 (Taylor and Francis, 2019), ISBN 978-0-429-49286-0, 978-0-201-62674-2

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.