The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.05884 · v1 · pith:JOPOJGBG · submitted 2026-07-07 · hep-th

A Crash Course in Supersymmetric Field Theory Across Dimensions

Xingyang Yu This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 19:34 UTCgrok-4.5pith:JOPOJGBGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-th
keywords supersymmetric field theorycross-dimensional surveymultipletsmoduli spacesdualitiesindicesanomaliesholomorphy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A cross-dimensional crash course shows that the same structures of supersymmetric field theory recur from two to ten dimensions and can be made concrete by representative computations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

These notes aim to establish that a reader can acquire enough shared vocabulary to recognize the basic setups of supersymmetric field theory in talks and papers by following a single set of recurring structures through dimensions two to ten, rather than by mastering a classification of theories in any one dimension. The structures include supersymmetry algebras and multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, anomalies, holomorphy, dualities, extremization principles, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints. Representative computations make the terminology concrete instead of purely abstract. A sympathetic reader would care because modern work frequently jumps between dimensions and relies on these shared tools; without a compact common language the literature is hard to enter. The notes therefore organize the subject around what stays the same across dimensions, not around exhaustive lists of what is special to each.

Core claim

The same structural toolkit—supersymmetry algebras, multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, anomalies, holomorphy, dualities, extremization principles, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints—recurs from two to ten spacetime dimensions and becomes concrete when worked through representative computations, thereby supplying a common language without requiring a classification of theories in any single dimension.

What carries the argument

The recurring structures themselves (supersymmetry algebras and multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, anomalies, holomorphy, dualities, extremization principles, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints) form the organizing spine that carries the argument from two to ten dimensions.

If this is right

  • A reader who works through the notes can recognize standard setups in talks and papers that jump between dimensions.
  • The same techniques for protected quantities, indices, and BPS data apply, with only dimension-dependent details, from two to ten dimensions.
  • Anomaly constraints and holomorphy continue to restrict consistent supersymmetric theories across the full range treated.
  • Dualities and extremization principles appear as organizing tools rather than isolated curiosities once viewed cross-dimensionally.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same organizational spine could be extended to one or eleven dimensions to test how many of the structures survive outside the range covered.
  • Graduate courses could adopt the cross-dimensional order instead of the usual four-dimensional-first sequence.
  • The concrete computations collected here could serve as a checklist for software that computes indices or BPS spectra in various dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

The particular selection of examples and computations is representative enough that a reader who masters them can reliably recognize the basic setups appearing in current research talks and papers, even though no full classification of theories is attempted in any one dimension.

What would settle it

If a substantial share of recent research talks and papers on supersymmetric field theory introduce basic setups whose terminology and structures lie outside the notes’ recurring list and worked examples, the claim that the survey supplies enough common language fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05884 by Xingyang Yu.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: The spinor reality type is periodic in (𝑑 − 2) mod 8 (Bott periodicity of the real Clifford algebra), so it is fixed by the residue 𝑟 alone: the engine computes it at the eight representatives 𝑑 = 2, . . . , 9 and the higher dimensions inherit it (𝑑 = 10 shares 𝑟 = 0 with 𝑑 = 2, 𝑑 = 11 shares 𝑟 = 1 with 𝑑 = 3). The minimal real count, the type applied to the Dirac dimension 2 ⌊𝑑/2⌋ , is not periodic: it … view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2: The dimensional ladder by real supercharge count. Each column is one count; a circle reduction moves down a column (arrows), conserving the count while the (𝑑, N ) label changes. Chiral cousins carry the same count by a different chirality: the 6𝑑 (2, 0) theory beside the non-chiral 6𝑑 (1, 1), and the 2𝑑 (𝑝, 𝑞) rows. The 32𝑄 row is the gravity-coupled ceiling, not a decoupled-QFT column. This is the pict… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Seiberg duality as a quiver move. Circles are gauge groups, squares are flavor groups, and arrows are chiral superfields (). The electric 𝑆𝑈(𝑁𝑐) theory has quarks 𝑄, 𝑄e running through the gauge node. The magnetic dual has gauge group 𝑆𝑈(𝑁𝑓 − 𝑁𝑐), the dual quarks 𝑞, 𝑞ewith reversed arrows, an added gauge-singlet meson 𝑀 (the elementary image of 𝑄𝑄e, drawn as the arc joining the two flavor nodes), and the… view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: The two phases of a Calabi–Yau gauged linear sigma model as the two ends of the quantum Kähler moduli space, the 𝑡 = 𝑟 −𝑖𝜃 cylinder. For 𝑟 ≫ 0 the theory is a nonlinear sigma model on the Calabi–Yau 𝑋; for 𝑟 ≪ 0 it is a Landau–Ginzburg orbifold. These are two ultraviolet regimes of one gauged linear sigma model that flows to one infrared superconformal field theory. The classical 𝑟 = 0 chamber wall sits … view at source ↗
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: The Seiberg–Witten curve (5.29) is a torus fibered over the 𝑢-plane. At a generic 𝑢 (a) it is smooth, with a basis of one-cycles 𝛼, 𝛽 whose periods are 𝑎𝐷 = ∮ 𝛼 𝜆SW and 𝑎 = ∮ 𝛽 𝜆SW. At 𝑢 = ±Λ 2 (b) two branch points collide and a one-cycle pinches: the period of the vanishing cycle goes to zero, so the BPS state with that charge becomes massless. The vanishing cycle is a different one-cycle at each point… view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: The Coulomb-branch 𝑢-plane with its three singularities: the monopole point 𝑢 = +Λ 2 (monodromy 𝑀𝑚), the dyon point 𝑢 = −Λ 2 (monodromy 𝑀𝑑), and the semiclassical point 𝑢 = ∞ (monodromy 𝑀∞). A large loop enclosing both finite singularities is homotopic to the loop at infinity, so the monodromies obey the ordered product 𝑀∞ = 𝑀𝑚𝑀𝑑 (5.37), the consistency condition that ties the strong-coupling physics to … view at source ↗
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.1. Figure 8.1: The 6𝑑 N = (1, 0) tensor branch, schematic. The real tensor scalar ⟨𝜙⟩ runs outward from the origin. On the branch the gauge coupling is set by 1/𝑔 2 ∼ ⟨𝜙⟩ and a self-dual string (charged under 𝐵) has tension 𝑇 ∼ ⟨𝜙⟩. At the origin (blue) the string becomes tensionless and the interacting superconformal field theory appears. The figure is a one-dimensional cartoon of an 𝑛𝑇-dimensional branch; the string,… view at source ↗
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.2. Figure 8.2: The N = (2, 0) 𝐴𝑁 −1 tensor branch as M5-brane transverse positions (here 𝑁 = 3), schematic. Separated M5-branes give 𝑁 − 1 free tensor multiplets; an M2-brane stretched between two M5s is a self-dual string with tension proportional to the separation. As the branes coincide (right) the stretched M2 becomes a tensionless string and the interacting superconformal field theory of rank 𝑁 − 1 appears at the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

These notes give a cross-dimensional crash course in supersymmetric field theory. The goal is to provide enough common language to recognize the basic setups used in talks and papers, while also working through representative computations that make the terminology concrete. We begin with supersymmetry algebras, multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, and anomalies, then follow these ideas through examples in two to ten spacetime dimensions. The emphasis is on recurring structures, such as holomorphy, supersymmetric vacua, dualities, extremization principles, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints, rather than on a classification of theories in any one dimension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a set of pedagogical notes offering a cross-dimensional crash course in supersymmetric field theory. It organizes the material around recurring structures—supersymmetry algebras, multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, anomalies, holomorphy, dualities, extremization principles, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints—rather than around a classification of theories in any single dimension. Representative computations are worked through in two through ten spacetime dimensions, with the stated goal of supplying enough common language for a reader to recognize the basic setups used in research talks and papers and of making the associated terminology concrete.

Significance. If the exposition is accurate and the chosen examples are well selected, the notes would be a genuine service to the community. Research talks and papers routinely move across dimensions and rely on a shared vocabulary of protected quantities, moduli problems, dualities, indices, and anomaly constraints; a single reference that emphasizes those recurring structures, rather than a full classification in one dimension, fills a real pedagogical gap between standard single-dimension textbooks and the research literature. The explicit commitment to representative computations (as opposed to pure taxonomy) is a strength of the stated design. Because the central claim is pedagogical rather than a novel research assertion, significance is measured by clarity, accuracy of the worked examples, and usefulness of the organizational principle.

minor comments (5)
  1. The abstract and opening statement of goals should more explicitly declare the assumed background (e.g., familiarity with ordinary QFT and with at least one standard treatment of 4d N=1 supersymmetry) and the intended audience. A crash course spanning 2–10d is ambitious; readers need a clear signal of what is presupposed so they can judge whether the notes match their preparation.
  2. When the notes decline a classification in any one dimension, it would help to add a short, explicit map (even a one-page table or roadmap) from the recurring structures listed in the abstract to the dimensional examples that illustrate them. That would make the selection principle legible and would address the natural question of representativeness without expanding the scope into a classification.
  3. Cross-references to standard textbook treatments (Wess–Bagger, Weinberg Vol. III, Freedman–Van Proeyen, the various TASI/PiTP notes on SUSY and dualities, etc.) should be placed at the first occurrence of each major structure so that a reader who wants a fuller single-dimension development can find it immediately.
  4. Notation for supercharges, R-symmetries, and central charges should be standardized early and kept uniform across the dimensional examples; small drifts in conventions between sections are a common source of confusion in multi-dimensional surveys.
  5. Where dualities, extremization principles, or anomaly constraints are illustrated, a one-sentence statement of the precise claim being checked in that example (and of what would constitute a failure of the check) would make the ‘representative computation’ more falsifiable for the student reader.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive reading of our notes. We are grateful for the clear summary of the manuscript’s aims and for the assessment that a cross-dimensional, structure-first presentation can fill a genuine pedagogical gap between single-dimension textbooks and the research literature. We also appreciate the emphasis on representative computations rather than pure taxonomy as a strength of the design. The recommendation is minor revision; the report as provided does not list concrete major comments or requested changes. We therefore respond to the overall evaluation below and remain ready to incorporate any specific minor corrections the referee or editor may still wish to indicate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: REFEREE SIGNIFICANCE / overall evaluation: If the exposition is accurate and the chosen examples are well selected, the notes would be a genuine service to the community. Significance is measured by clarity, accuracy of the worked examples, and usefulness of the organizational principle. RECOMMENDATION: minor_revision. (No itemized major comments are supplied.)

    Authors: We agree that, for a pedagogical manuscript, significance rests on clarity, accuracy of the worked examples, and the usefulness of organizing around recurring structures (algebras and multiplets, protected quantities, moduli and deformations, holomorphy, dualities, extremization, indices, BPS data, and anomaly constraints) rather than a full classification in one dimension. That organizational principle and the commitment to representative computations in two through ten dimensions are exactly the design choices we intended. Because the report does not identify specific inaccuracies, missing examples, or passages that require rewriting, we have not made content changes in response to major comments. We will of course correct any concrete errata or minor presentational issues that the referee or editor flags, and we are happy to expand or rebalance particular examples if that is requested. We believe the manuscript already meets the standards of accuracy and selection implied by the significance assessment, and we thank the referee for the supportive framing of the notes’ intended service to the community. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: pedagogical survey with no novel first-principles predictions or forced results.

full rationale

These notes are an explicit crash-course survey whose stated goal is pedagogical common language (SUSY algebras, multiplets, protected quantities, moduli spaces, deformations, anomalies, holomorphy, dualities, extremization, indices, BPS data, anomaly constraints) plus representative computations in 2–10d, not a classification or a novel quantitative derivation. No load-bearing step claims that a target observable is obtained from first principles while that observable is already built into the inputs by definition, fit, or self-cited uniqueness. The notes draw structures and computations from the established literature rather than closing a loop under the author’s own fitted constants or an ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. Self-citations, if any, are ordinary survey references and are not used to forbid alternatives or to force a central result. Because there is no claimed prediction that reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-definitional identity, the circularity score is zero; the exposition is self-contained as pedagogy against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

As pedagogical notes on established supersymmetric field theory, the work rests on the standard mathematical and physical background of the subject rather than on free parameters fitted to data or on newly invented entities. The ledger below records the background assumptions the survey necessarily inherits; none are ad hoc inventions of this paper. No free parameters or invented particles/forces appear in the abstract's scope.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Existence and standard classification of supersymmetry algebras and supermultiplets in 2–10 spacetime dimensions as developed in the prior literature.
    The notes begin from these algebras and multiplets; they are taken as given background rather than re-derived from more primitive axioms in the abstract's description.
  • standard math Standard quantum field theory and representation theory of Lorentz and R-symmetry groups needed to define protected quantities, moduli spaces, anomalies, and indices.
    Required to make sense of holomorphy, BPS data, extremization principles, and anomaly constraints that the notes emphasize.
  • domain assumption That dualities, extremization principles, and anomaly constraints as used in the modern SUSY literature are correctly stated in the sources the notes draw on.
    A crash course inherits the correctness of the dualities and constraints it surveys; the abstract does not claim independent re-proofs of all of them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6183 in / 2539 out tokens · 49763 ms · 2026-07-08T19:34:51.447084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 201 canonical work pages · 155 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

    Seiberg, Nathan and Witten, Edward. Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. Nucl. Phys. B. 1994. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90124-4. arXiv:hep-th/9407087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90124-4 1994

  2. [2]

    Monopoles, Duality and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in N=2 Supersymmetric QCD

    Seiberg, Nathan and Witten, Edward. Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD. Nucl. Phys. B. 1994. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90214-3. arXiv:hep-th/9408099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90214-3 1994

  3. [3]

    S-duality in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories

    Argyres, Philip C. and Seiberg, Nathan. S-duality in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories. JHEP. 2007. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/088. arXiv:0711.0054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/088 2007

  4. [4]

    New Phenomena in SU(3) Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

    Argyres, Philip C. and Douglas, Michael R. New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00281-V. arXiv:hep-th/9505062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00281-v 1995

  5. [5]

    N=2 dualities

    Gaiotto, Davide. N=2 dualities. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)034. arXiv:0904.2715

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2012)034 2012

  6. [6]

    Four-dimensional wall-crossing via three-dimensional field theory

    Gaiotto, Davide and Moore, Gregory W. and Neitzke, Andrew. Four-dimensional wall-crossing via three-dimensional field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 2010. doi:10.1007/s00220-010-1071-2. arXiv:0807.4723

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-010-1071-2 2010

  7. [7]

    Seiberg-Witten Prepotential From Instanton Counting

    Nekrasov, Nikita A. Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2003. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n5.a4. arXiv:hep-th/0206161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n5.a4 2003

  8. [9]

    New N=2 Superconformal Field Theories in Four Dimensions

    Argyres, Philip C. and Plesser, M. Ronen and Seiberg, Nathan and Witten, Edward. New N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00671-0. arXiv:hep-th/9511154

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00671-0 1996

  9. [10]

    Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions

    Shapere, Alfred D. and Tachikawa, Yuji. Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/109. arXiv:0804.1957

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/109 2008

  10. [11]

    Seiberg-Witten Theory and Random Partitions

    Nekrasov, Nikita and Okounkov, Andrei. Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions. Prog. Math. 2006. doi:10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15. arXiv:hep-th/0306238

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/0-8176-4467-9_15 2006

  11. [12]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories

    Alday, Luis F. and Gaiotto, Davide and Tachikawa, Yuji. Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5. arXiv:0906.3219

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11005-010-0369-5 2010

  12. [13]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops

    Pestun, Vasily. Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops. Commun. Math. Phys. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1485-0. arXiv:0712.2824

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1485-0 2012

  13. [14]

    Localization techniques in quantum field theories

    Pestun, Vasily and others. Localization techniques in quantum field theories. J. Phys. A. 2017. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1. arXiv:1608.02952

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa63c1 2017

  14. [15]

    Introduction to Seiberg-Witten Theory and its Stringy Origin

    Lerche, W. Introduction to Seiberg-Witten theory and its stringy origin. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00073-X. arXiv:hep-th/9611190

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(97)00073-x 1997

  15. [16]

    Framed BPS States

    Gaiotto, Davide and Moore, Gregory W. and Neitzke, Andrew. Framed BPS States. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2013. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2013.v17.n2.a1. arXiv:1006.0146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2013.v17.n2.a1 2013

  16. [17]

    Wall-Crossing in Coupled 2d-4d Systems

    Gaiotto, Davide and Moore, Gregory W. and Neitzke, Andrew. Wall-Crossing in Coupled 2d-4d Systems. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)082. arXiv:1103.2598

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)082 2012

  17. [18]

    Seiberg-Witten Geometry of Four-Dimensional $\mathcal N=2$ Quiver Gauge Theories

    Nekrasov, Nikita and Pestun, Vasily. Seiberg-Witten Geometry of Four-Dimensional N=2 Quiver Gauge Theories. SIGMA. 2023. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2023.047. arXiv:1211.2240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3842/sigma.2023.047 2023

  18. [19]

    Geometric constraints on the space of N=2 SCFTs I: physical constraints on relevant deformations

    Argyres, Philip and Lotito, Matteo and L. Geometric constraints on the space of N = 2 SCFTs. Part I: physical constraints on relevant deformations. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2018)001. arXiv:1505.04814

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2018)001 2018

  19. [20]

    Deformations of Superconformal Theories

    Cordova, Clay and Dumitrescu, Thomas T. and Intriligator, Kenneth. Deformations of Superconformal Theories. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)135. arXiv:1602.01217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)135 2016

  20. [21]

    General Argyres-Douglas Theory

    Xie, Dan. General Argyres-Douglas Theory. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2013)100. arXiv:1204.2270

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2013)100 2013

  21. [22]

    Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions

    Beem, Christopher and Lemos, Madalena and Liendo, Pedro and Peelaers, Wolfger and Rastelli, Leonardo and van Rees, Balt C. Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2272-x. arXiv:1312.5344

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2272-x 2015

  22. [23]

    Mirror Symmetry in Three Dimensional Gauge Theories

    Intriligator, Kenneth A. and Seiberg, Nathan. Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories. Phys. Lett. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)01088-X. arXiv:hep-th/9607207

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)01088-x 1996

  23. [24]

    Topological Disorder Operators in Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theory

    Borokhov, Vadim and Kapustin, Anton and Wu, Xin-kai. Topological disorder operators in three-dimensional conformal field theory. JHEP. 2002. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/11/049. arXiv:hep-th/0206054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/11/049 2002

  24. [25]

    Polyakov conjecture for hyperbolic singularities

    Borokhov, Vadim. Monopole operators in three-dimensional N=4 SYM and mirror symmetry. JHEP. 2004. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/03/008. arXiv:hep-th/0308131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/03/008 2004

  25. [26]

    The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z

    Jafferis, Daniel L. The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2012)159. arXiv:1012.3210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2012)159 2012

  26. [27]

    Aspects of N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in Three Dimensions

    Aharony, Ofer and Hanany, Amihay and Intriligator, Kenneth A. and Seiberg, Nathan and Strassler, M. J. Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00323-4. arXiv:hep-th/9703110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00323-4 1997

  27. [28]

    IR Duality in d=3 N=2 Supersymmetric USp(2N_c) and U(N_c) Gauge Theories

    Aharony, Ofer. IR duality in d = 3 N=2 supersymmetric USp(2N(c)) and U(N(c)) gauge theories. Phys. Lett. B. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00530-3. arXiv:hep-th/9703215

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00530-3 1997

  28. [29]

    Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory

    Giveon, Amit and Kutasov, David. Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory. Nucl. Phys. B. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.007. arXiv:0808.0360

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.007 2009

  29. [30]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    Aharony, Ofer and Bergman, Oren and Jafferis, Daniel Louis and Maldacena, Juan. N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091. arXiv:0806.1218

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091 2008

  30. [31]

    From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory

    Drukker, Nadav and Marino, Marcos and Putrov, Pavel. From weak to strong coupling in ABJM theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1253-6. arXiv:1007.3837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1253-6 2011

  31. [32]

    Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter

    Kapustin, Anton and Willett, Brian and Yaakov, Itamar. Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2010)089. arXiv:0909.4559

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2010)089 2010

  32. [33]

    The F-Theorem and F-Maximization

    Pufu, Silviu S. The F-Theorem and F-Maximization. J. Phys. A. 2017. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6765. arXiv:1608.02960

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6765 2017

  33. [34]

    Mirror Symmetry in Three-Dimensional Gauge Theories, Quivers and D-branes

    de Boer, Jan and Hori, Kentaro and Ooguri, Hirosi and Oz, Yaron. Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories, quivers and D-branes. Nucl. Phys. B. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00073-4. arXiv:hep-th/9611063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00073-4 1997

  34. [35]

    Redlich, A. N. Gauge Noninvariance and Parity Nonconservation of Three-Dimensional Fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.18

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.18 1984

  35. [36]

    N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians

    Tachikawa, Yuji. N=2 Supersymmetric Dynamics for Pedestrians. 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08822-8. arXiv:1312.2684

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08822-8 2014

  36. [37]

    On Conformal Theories in Four Dimensions

    Lawrence, Albion E. and Nekrasov, Nikita and Vafa, Cumrun. On conformal field theories in four-dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00495-7. arXiv:hep-th/9803015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(98)00495-7 1998

  37. [38]

    Supersymmetry enhancement by monopole operators

    Bashkirov, Denis and Kapustin, Anton. Supersymmetry enhancement by monopole operators. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2011)015. arXiv:1007.4861

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2011)015 2011

  38. [39]

    Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories

    Closset, Cyril and Dumitrescu, Thomas T. and Festuccia, Guido and Komargodski, Zohar and Seiberg, Nathan. Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories. JHEP. 2012. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)053. arXiv:1205.4142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2012)053 2012

  39. [40]

    Modeling Multiple M2's

    Bagger, Jonathan and Lambert, Neil. Modeling Multiple M2's. Phys. Rev. D. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.045020. arXiv:hep-th/0611108

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.045020 2007

  40. [41]

    Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes

    Gustavsson, Andreas. Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes. Nucl. Phys. B. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.014. arXiv:0709.1260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.014 2009

  41. [42]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    Gaiotto, Davide and Witten, Edward. S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2009. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2009.v13.n3.a5. arXiv:0807.3720

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2009.v13.n3.a5 2009

  42. [43]

    The Coulomb Branch of 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ Theories

    Bullimore, Mathew and Dimofte, Tudor and Gaiotto, Davide. The Coulomb Branch of 3d N = 4 Theories. Commun. Math. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2903-0. arXiv:1503.04817

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2903-0 2017

  43. [44]

    On Mirror Symmetry in Three Dimensional Abelian Gauge Theories

    Kapustin, Anton and Strassler, Matthew J. On mirror symmetry in three-dimensional Abelian gauge theories. JHEP. 1999. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/04/021. arXiv:hep-th/9902033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/04/021 1999

  44. [45]

    Type IIB Superstrings, BPS Monopoles, And Three-Dimensional Gauge Dynamics

    Hanany, Amihay and Witten, Edward. Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics. Nucl. Phys. B. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00157-0. arXiv:hep-th/9611230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00157-0 1997

  45. [46]

    Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N = 4 gauge theories

    Cremonesi, Stefano and Hanany, Amihay and Zaffaroni, Alberto. Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N = 4 gauge theories. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)005. arXiv:1309.2657

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)005 2014

  46. [47]

    3d dualities from 4d dualities

    Aharony, Ofer and Razamat, Shlomo S. and Seiberg, Nathan and Willett, Brian. 3d dualities from 4d dualities. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)149. arXiv:1305.3924

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2013)149 2013

  47. [48]

    A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories

    Benini, Francesco and Zaffaroni, Alberto. A topologically twisted index for three-dimensional supersymmetric theories. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)127. arXiv:1504.03698

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2015)127 2015

  48. [49]

    Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds

    Dimofte, Tudor and Gaiotto, Davide and Gukov, Sergei. Gauge Theories Labelled by Three-Manifolds. Commun. Math. Phys. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00220-013-1863-2. arXiv:1108.4389

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-013-1863-2 2014

  49. [50]

    Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories

    Closset, Cyril and Kim, Heeyeon. Comments on twisted indices in 3d supersymmetric gauge theories. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)059. arXiv:1605.06531

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)059 2016

  50. [51]

    On Three Dimensional Quiver Gauge Theories and Integrability

    Gaiotto, Davide and Koroteev, Peter. On Three Dimensional Quiver Gauge Theories and Integrability. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2013)126. arXiv:1304.0779

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2013)126 2013

  51. [52]

    and Schwarz, John H

    Green, Michael B. and Schwarz, John H. Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory. Phys. Lett. B. 1984. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91565-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91565-x 1984

  52. [53]

    A Note on the Green - Schwarz Mechanism in Open - String Theories

    Sagnotti, Augusto. A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories. Phys. Lett. B. 1992. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91369-J. arXiv:hep-th/9210127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91369-j 1992

  53. [54]

    Anomaly-Free Supersymmetric Models in Six Dimensions

    Schwarz, John H. Anomaly-free supersymmetric models in six dimensions. Phys. Lett. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00195-3. arXiv:hep-th/9512053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00195-3 1996

  54. [55]

    Anomaly polynomial of general 6d SCFTs

    Ohmori, Kantaro and Shimizu, Hiroyuki and Tachikawa, Yuji and Yonekura, Kazuya. Anomaly polynomial of general 6d SCFTs. PTEP. 2014. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptu140. arXiv:1408.5572

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/ptep/ptu140 2014

  55. [56]

    Non-abelian Tensor-multiplet Anomalies

    Harvey, Jeffrey A. and Minasian, Ruben and Moore, Gregory W. NonAbelian tensor multiplet anomalies. JHEP. 1998. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/09/004. arXiv:hep-th/9808060

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/09/004 1998

  56. [57]

    Anomaly polynomial of E-string theories

    Intriligator, Kenneth. Anomaly matching and a Hopf-Wess-Zumino term in 6d, N=(2,0) field theories. Nucl. Phys. B. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.12.003. arXiv:1404.3887

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.12.003 2015

  57. [58]

    Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions

    C\'ordova, Clay and Dumitrescu, Thomas T. and Intriligator, Kenneth. Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)163. arXiv:1612.00809

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2019)163 2019

  58. [59]

    The Holographic Weyl anomaly

    Henningson, M. and Skenderis, K. The Holographic Weyl anomaly. JHEP. 1998. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023. arXiv:hep-th/9806087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023 1998

  59. [60]

    Non-trivial Fixed Points of The Renormalization Group in Six Dimensions

    Seiberg, Nathan. Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six dimensions. Phys. Lett. B. 1997. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01480-4. arXiv:hep-th/9609161

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01480-4 1997

  60. [61]

    On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds

    Heckman, Jonathan J. and Morrison, David R. and Vafa, Cumrun. On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)028. arXiv:1312.5746

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)028 2014

  61. [62]

    Anomalies, Renormalization Group Flows, and the a-Theorem in Six-Dimensional (1,0) Theories

    C\'ordova, Clay and Dumitrescu, Thomas T. and Intriligator, Kenneth. Anomalies, renormalization group flows, and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1,0) theories. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)080. arXiv:1506.03807

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)080 2016

  62. [63]

    Some Comments On String Dynamics

    Witten, Edward. Some comments on string dynamics. 1995. arXiv:hep-th/9507121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  63. [64]

    Open P-Branes

    Strominger, Andrew. Open p-branes. Phys. Lett. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00712-5. arXiv:hep-th/9512059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00712-5 1996

  64. [65]

    Anomaly of (2,0) Theories

    Yi, Piljin. Anomaly of (2,0) theories. Phys. Rev. D. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.106006. arXiv:hep-th/0106165

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.106006 2001

  65. [66]

    6d Conformal Matter

    Del Zotto, Michele and Heckman, Jonathan J. and Tomasiello, Alessandro and Vafa, Cumrun. 6d Conformal Matter. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)054. arXiv:1407.6359

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2015)054 2015

  66. [67]

    Top Down Approach to 6D SCFTs

    Heckman, Jonathan J. and Rudelius, Tom. Top Down Approach to 6D SCFTs. J. Phys. A. 2019. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aafc81. arXiv:1805.06467

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aafc81 2019

  67. [68]

    Classification of 6d N=(1,0) gauge theories

    Bhardwaj, Lakshya. Classification of 6d N = (1,0 ) gauge theories. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)002. arXiv:1502.06594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2015)002 2015

  68. [69]

    Anomaly polynomial of E-string theories

    Ohmori, Kantaro and Shimizu, Hiroyuki and Tachikawa, Yuji. Anomaly polynomial of E-string theories. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)002. arXiv:1404.3887

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)002 2014

  69. [70]

    Wess, Julius and Bagger, Jonathan , title =

    work page

  70. [71]

    The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Maximizes a

    Intriligator, Kenneth A. and Wecht, Brian. The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a. Nucl. Phys. B. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00459-0. arXiv:hep-th/0304128

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(03)00459-0 2003

  71. [72]

    Electric-Magnetic Duality in Supersymmetric Non-Abelian Gauge Theories

    Seiberg, Nathan. Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00023-8. arXiv:hep-th/9411149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00023-8 1995

  72. [73]

    The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space

    Benvenuti, Sergio and Hanany, Amihay and Mekareeya, Noppadol. The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)100. arXiv:1005.3026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)100 2010

  73. [74]

    Walls, Lines, and Spectral Dualities in 3d Gauge Theories

    Gadde, Abhijit and Gukov, Sergei and Putrov, Pavel. Walls, Lines, and Spectral Dualities in 3d Gauge Theories. JHEP. 2014. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)047. arXiv:1302.0015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2014)047 2014

  74. [75]

    and Wess, J

    Ferrara, S. and Wess, J. and Zumino, B. Supergauge Multiplets and Superfields. Phys. Lett. B. 1974. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(74)90283-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(74)90283-4 1974

  75. [76]

    Salam, Abdus and Strathdee, J. A. On Superfields and Fermi-Bose Symmetry. Phys. Rev. D. 1975. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.1521

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.1521 1975

  76. [77]

    On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions

    Komargodski, Zohar and Schwimmer, Adam. On Renormalization Group Flows in Four Dimensions. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2011)099. arXiv:1107.3987

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2011)099 2011

  77. [78]

    Naturalness Versus Supersymmetric Non-renormalization Theorems

    Seiberg, Nathan. Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems. Phys. Lett. B. 1993. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91541-T. arXiv:hep-ph/9309335

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91541-t 1993

  78. [79]

    2004 TASI Lectures on Supersymmetry Breaking

    Luty, Markus A. 2004 TASI lectures on supersymmetry breaking. Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics : Physics in D 4. 2005. arXiv:hep-th/0509029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  79. [80]

    Comments on Supercurrent Multiplets, Supersymmetric Field Theories and Supergravity

    Komargodski, Zohar and Seiberg, Nathan. Comments on Supercurrent Multiplets, Supersymmetric Field Theories and Supergravity. JHEP. 2010. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)017. arXiv:1002.2228

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2010)017 2010

  80. [81]

    Rigid Supersymmetric Theories in Curved Superspace

    Festuccia, Guido and Seiberg, Nathan. Rigid Supersymmetric Theories in Curved Superspace. JHEP. 2011. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)114. arXiv:1105.0689

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2011)114 2011

Showing first 80 references.