pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09810 · v1 · pith:K5LTECAJnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA· gr-qc

Inflationary interpretation of the gravitational-wave signal in the European Pulsar Timing Array DR2 with constraints

Philippe Turgeon , Chiara Caprini , Anton Chudaykin , Martin Kunz , Delphine Perrodin , Ismael Cognard , Lucas Guillemot , Gilles Theureau This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesinflationpulsar timing arrayreheating temperaturetensor spectral indexEPTA signal
0
0 comments X

The pith

Imposing CMB, BBN and LVK constraints reduces viable inflationary parameters for the EPTA gravitational-wave signal to a narrow range that requires low reheating temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the gravitational-wave background reported by the European Pulsar Timing Array second data release can be explained entirely by primordial tensor modes from inflation. It introduces a four-parameter description of the tensor spectrum and folds in independent limits from the cosmic microwave background, big-bang nucleosynthesis, and ground-based interferometers. The surviving region of parameter space is small and forces the reheating temperature to lie well below typical expectations while still allowing the modes to re-enter the horizon during radiation domination. A sympathetic reader would care because a positive result would tie a nanohertz signal directly to the earliest moments after inflation, whereas the narrow window highlights how tightly future data could rule the scenario out.

Core claim

After applying all relevant observational constraints the region of parameter space that can account for the EPTA signal shrinks to −11.66 ≲ log₁₀ r ≲ −1.45, 1.32 ≲ n_t ≲ 2.47, 1.78 MeV ≲ T_rh ≲ 28.2 GeV and 75.86 nHz ≲ f_end ≲ 14.45 Hz at 95 % CL. This interval favours tensor modes that re-enter the Hubble radius during radiation domination, permitting a higher tensor-to-scalar ratio and a blue-tilted spectrum, yet it simultaneously demands an unusually low reheating temperature.

What carries the argument

Four-parameter tensor power spectrum controlled by the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, the tensor tilt n_t, the reheating temperature T_rh, and the cutoff frequency f_end, which together set the amplitude, slope, and high-frequency termination of the inflationary gravitational-wave background.

If this is right

  • Tensor modes responsible for the signal re-enter the horizon while the universe is radiation-dominated.
  • A comparatively large tensor-to-scalar ratio remains compatible with the data once the low reheating temperature is accepted.
  • The spectrum must be blue-tilted (positive n_t) inside the allowed window.
  • Any viable model must produce reheating at temperatures no higher than a few tens of GeV.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Reheating mechanisms capable of ending inflation at such low temperatures would need to be constructed and checked against other early-universe observables.
  • Future pulsar-timing arrays with improved sensitivity could tighten the upper bound on T_rh and thereby test the scenario more stringently.
  • If the cutoff frequency lies near the upper end of the allowed interval, the end of inflation would occur at energy scales that might leave imprints in other cosmological probes.

Load-bearing premise

The entire EPTA signal is generated by inflationary tensor modes whose spectrum is accurately captured by a single power-law segment ending at one cutoff frequency, with no other cosmological or astrophysical sources contributing at these frequencies.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the nanohertz spectrum deviates from the allowed ranges in r, n_t or f_end, or direct evidence that astrophysical sources dominate the EPTA band, would rule out the inflationary interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09810 by Anton Chudaykin, Chiara Caprini, Delphine Perrodin, Gilles Theureau, Ismael Cognard, Lucas Guillemot, Martin Kunz, Philippe Turgeon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Posterior distributions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Theoretical predictions for Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Number of e-folds of reheating in the posterior pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Hubble factor at the end of inflation in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 95% CL posteriors for the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Posterior distributions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Theoretical predictions for Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The second data release of the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) collaboration provides evidence for the presence of a gravitational-wave (GW) background. In this work, we explore a potential cosmological interpretation of this signal in terms of inflationary scenarios. We parametrize the tensor power spectrum in terms of the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$, the tensor spectral index $n_t$, the reheating temperature $T_{\text{rh}}$, and the cut-off frequency $f_{\text{end}}$. We incorporate all relevant observational constraints, including those from the Cosmic Microwave Background, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, and LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observations. We demonstrate that imposing these constraints consistently reduces the region of parameter space that provides a viable interpretation of the EPTA signal, to $-11.66 \lesssim \log_{10}r \lesssim -1.45$, $1.32 \lesssim n_t \lesssim 2.47$, $1.78\text{ MeV} \lesssim T_{\text{rh}} \lesssim 28.2\text{ GeV}$, and $75.86\text{ nHz} \lesssim f_{\text{end}} \lesssim 14.45\text{ Hz}$ at the 95% confidence level. This favours the scenario in which the GW spectrum in the EPTA frequency band originates from tensor modes that re-entered the Hubble radius during the radiation-dominated era, allowing for a higher $r$ and a flatter spectrum. However, $T_{\text{rh}}$ must take very low values, which are challenging to explain theoretically.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores a cosmological interpretation of the gravitational-wave background signal detected in the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA) DR2 as arising from inflationary tensor modes. It parametrizes the tensor power spectrum with four free parameters (tensor-to-scalar ratio r, tensor spectral index n_t, reheating temperature T_rh, and cut-off frequency f_end), incorporates external constraints from CMB, BBN, and LVK observations, and reports 95% CL intervals on the parameters after these constraints are applied: −11.66 ≲ log₁₀ r ≲ −1.45, 1.32 ≲ n_t ≲ 2.47, 1.78 MeV ≲ T_rh ≲ 28.2 GeV, and 75.86 nHz ≲ f_end ≲ 14.45 Hz. The results are interpreted as favoring tensor modes that re-enter during radiation domination while requiring unusually low reheating temperatures.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions are valid, the work supplies quantitative bounds on inflationary parameters that are simultaneously consistent with the EPTA signal and independent cosmological probes. It adds to the literature on PTA signals by showing how external data shrink the viable space and by identifying a preference for a blue-tilted spectrum with low T_rh, which may motivate further model-building in inflationary cosmology.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 95% CL intervals rest on the assumption that the entire EPTA signal is generated by the four-parameter inflationary tensor spectrum with a single cut-off at f_end and that no astrophysical (e.g., SMBHB) or additional cosmological contributions are present. No quantitative assessment of the allowed fractional contribution from other sources or robustness checks against mixed-signal models is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the quoted ranges.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and parameter-estimation procedure: The abstract states the final constrained intervals but supplies no information on the likelihood function, prior choices for the four parameters, or the precise manner in which the three external data sets (CMB, BBN, LVK) are combined with the EPTA likelihood. Without these details the numerical intervals cannot be reproduced or their sensitivity to modeling choices evaluated.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the constraints 'consistently reduce' the viable region is presented without an explicit description of whether the external bounds are imposed as hard cuts, as additional likelihood terms, or via importance sampling; the procedure's internal consistency therefore cannot be verified from the given information.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The use of approximate inequalities (≲) for the reported 95% CL bounds could be replaced by explicit interval notation for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions to the abstract will be made to improve transparency without altering the core analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 95% CL intervals rest on the assumption that the entire EPTA signal is generated by the four-parameter inflationary tensor spectrum with a single cut-off at f_end and that no astrophysical (e.g., SMBHB) or additional cosmological contributions are present. No quantitative assessment of the allowed fractional contribution from other sources or robustness checks against mixed-signal models is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the quoted ranges.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the analysis assumes the EPTA DR2 signal arises entirely from the inflationary tensor spectrum under the four-parameter model with a single cutoff. This is the explicit scope of the work, which explores one viable cosmological interpretation consistent with external bounds. A quantitative mixed-signal analysis including astrophysical contributions lies beyond the present scope and would require a substantially expanded framework. We will add a clarifying sentence to the abstract and discussion to explicitly state this modeling assumption and its bearing on the reported intervals. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and parameter-estimation procedure: The abstract states the final constrained intervals but supplies no information on the likelihood function, prior choices for the four parameters, or the precise manner in which the three external data sets (CMB, BBN, and LVK) are combined with the EPTA likelihood. Without these details the numerical intervals cannot be reproduced or their sensitivity to modeling choices evaluated.

    Authors: The likelihood function (product of EPTA, CMB, BBN, and LVK terms), prior choices (uniform in log10 r and flat in n_t, log T_rh, log f_end), and combination procedure are fully specified in Sections 3 and 4 of the manuscript. To make the abstract more self-contained, we will revise it to note that a Bayesian analysis is performed with external constraints included as multiplicative likelihood factors, with full details in the main text. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the constraints 'consistently reduce' the viable region is presented without an explicit description of whether the external bounds are imposed as hard cuts, as additional likelihood terms, or via importance sampling; the procedure's internal consistency therefore cannot be verified from the given information.

    Authors: The external constraints are incorporated as additional terms in the joint likelihood (i.e., the total posterior is proportional to the EPTA likelihood times the CMB, BBN, and LVK likelihoods), not as hard cuts or importance sampling. This is described in the parameter-estimation section. We will revise the abstract to state that the constraints are applied through the combined likelihood, which produces the reported reduction in viable parameter space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; constraints are direct outputs of fitting independent external data to the chosen model.

full rationale

The paper performs a standard parameter fit of the four-parameter tensor spectrum (r, n_t, T_rh, f_end) to the EPTA signal while imposing separate CMB, BBN and LVK bounds. The quoted 95% CL intervals are the resulting posterior ranges, not redefinitions or forced outputs of the inputs themselves. No self-definitional relations, relabeling of fits as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. External datasets are independent of the EPTA measurement and the model parametrization is stated explicitly rather than smuggled via prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Four free parameters (r, n_t, T_rh, f_end) are introduced and constrained by data. The model rests on standard cosmological assumptions plus the interpretive premise that the EPTA signal is inflationary.

free parameters (4)
  • r
    Tensor-to-scalar ratio, bounded by the fit to EPTA plus external data.
  • n_t
    Tensor spectral index, allowed to be positive in the surviving region.
  • T_rh
    Reheating temperature, forced to low values by the combined constraints.
  • f_end
    Cut-off frequency marking the end of the inflationary tensor spectrum.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Λ CDM background cosmology and power-law tensor spectrum with cut-off
    Used to translate the four parameters into a present-day GW spectrum.
  • ad hoc to paper The EPTA signal is produced by inflationary tensor modes
    The central interpretive premise explored in the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5861 in / 1501 out tokens · 29654 ms · 2026-06-27T15:35:12.314019+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Inflationary interpretation of the gravitational-wave signal in the European Pulsar Timing Array DR2 with constraints

    INTRODUCTION In 1978-1979, Sazhin [1] and Dettweiler [2] proposed using residuals from the Times-Of-Arrival (TOAs) of pul- sar signals to detect a stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (GWB). Foster and Backer [3] were the first to propose monitoring highly stable millisecond pulsars in the search for a GWB, an approach now known as Pulsar Timing Array...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1978

  2. [2]

    In our analysis, we assume a constantn t over the entire frequency range, from CMB scales to those corresponding to PTAs and ground-based GW detectors

    GWB MODEL We consider a four-parameter framework characterized by the tensor-to-scalar ratior, the tensor spectral index nt, the reheating temperatureT rh and the high-frequency cutoff of the IGW spectrum,f end. In our analysis, we assume a constantn t over the entire frequency range, from CMB scales to those corresponding to PTAs and ground-based GW dete...

  3. [3]

    EPTA data We use the EPTA 25-pulsar dataset,DR2new, collected over 10.3 years of observations [13]

    DATA AND ANALYSIS 3.1. EPTA data We use the EPTA 25-pulsar dataset,DR2new, collected over 10.3 years of observations [13]. These measurements were obtained with new-generation backends that pro- vide substantially wider bandwidths and improved sen- sitivity, yielding robust evidence for a GWB signal with Hellings–Downs correlations (≳3σsignificance). We d...

  4. [4]

    “BLVK” constraints BBN+CMB bounds.The integrated GW energy density must not exceed the upper limits set by BBN and CMB observations on additional contributions to the radiation energy density, Z fend fi d f f h2ΩGW(f)≤ B i , i={BBN,CMB}.(10) For the lower integration bound,f i ={f BBN, fCMB}, we adopt respectively: the mode that are sub-Hubble at the time...

  5. [5]

    “CMB” constraints CMB data.The CMB polarization data provide ad- ditional information about the amplitude and the tilt of the primordial tensor power spectrum. We take into ac- count the measurement of the CMB B-mode polarization angular power spectrum from the joint BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck analysis [63] that is, at 95% CL, r0.01 <0.076 −0.55< n t <2...

  6. [6]

    large”-Trh and “small

    RESULTS Fig. 1 shows the main results on the cosmological pa- rameters obtained from the chains. Tab. II presents the one-dimensional marginalized constraints. Fig. 2 displays the theoretical predictions of Ω GW(f) for a subset of chains randomly selected from these analyses. 4.1. EPTA analysis We begin by presenting results of the EPTA data anal- ysis ob...

  7. [7]

    In this work, they adopt an FIG

    COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS ANALYSES In this section we compare our results with results de- rived in previous analyses, starting with the EPTA of- ficial DR2 analysis [14]. In this work, they adopt an FIG. 3. Number of e-folds of reheating in the posterior pa- rameter space log 10 Trh andn t for the EPTA+BLVK+CMB dataset. The light-blue shaded region correspo...

  8. [8]

    We have demonstrated that it is impor- tant to include external observational and physical con- straints in the parameter space selection

    CONCLUSION In this work, we have investigated the parameter space within which an IGWB could account for the EPTA DR2 measurement. We have demonstrated that it is impor- tant to include external observational and physical con- straints in the parameter space selection. This shifts the parameter space of the IGWB capable of fitting PTA data towards more na...

  9. [9]

    Gravitational Wave Detection using Pulsar Tim- ing Arrays

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PT thanks his PhD supervisor Bence B´ ecsy, Go- lam Shaifullah who wrote the tutorials that served as a foundation for analysing the dataset, and Hippolyte Quelquejay Lecl` ere who provided information and ref- erences on EPTA’s methods. CC and PT thank Stas Babak for advice on implementing certain functions inENTERPRISE. The authors also...

    2023

  10. [10]

    M. V. Sazhin, Soviet Astronomy22, 36 (1978), aDS Bib- code: 1978SvA....22...36S

    1978

  11. [11]

    Detweiler, The Astrophysical Journal234, 1100 (1979), aDS Bibcode: 1979ApJ...234.1100D

    S. Detweiler, The Astrophysical Journal234, 1100 (1979), aDS Bibcode: 1979ApJ...234.1100D

    1979

  12. [12]

    R. S. Foster and D. C. Backer, ApJ361, 300 (1990)

    1990

  13. [13]

    M. A. McLaughlin, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 224008 (2013), arXiv:1310.0758 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    Z. Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 905, L34 (2020), arXiv:2009.04496 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array

    G. Desvigneset al.(EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 458, 3341 (2016), arXiv:1602.08511 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Chenet al.(EPTA), Mon

    S. Chenet al.(EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 4970 (2021), arXiv:2110.13184 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    R. N. Manchesteret al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.30, 17 (2013), arXiv:1210.6130 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Goncharovet al.,On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys

    B. Goncharovet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.917, L19 (2021), 15 FIG. 6. Posterior distributions for theT rh,f end,randn t parameters obtained from the EPTA (green) and EPTA+BLVK+CMB (orange) datasets. The smooth contours display the 1σand 2σcredible regions of the posterior distributions.Left panel: Parameter constraints obtained from the unprocessed chains.Ri...

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Antoniadiset al., Mon

    J. Antoniadiset al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510, 4873 (2022), arXiv:2201.03980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    R. w. Hellings and G. s. Downs, Astrophys. J. Lett.265, 16 Data/Model log 10 r n t log10(Trh/eV) log 10(fend/Hz) Unprocessed EPTA−20.69 +12.90 −13.41 3.61+1.93 −1.73 Unconstrained>−7.26 EPTA+BLVK−15.53 +11.92 −20.03 2.69+2.43 −2.12 9.44+1.43 −3.19 −6.72+13.19 −0.88 EPTA+BLVK+CMB−9.40 +6.89 −26.08 2.00+0.50 −1.73 9.72+1.49 −3.13 −4.18+6.25 −3.13 Post-proce...

    1983

  21. [21]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys. 685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    D. G. Figueroa, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and P. Simakachorn, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 171002 (2024), arXiv:2307.02399 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matar- rese, Riv. Nuovo Cim.39, 399 (2016), arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi, and S. Yokoyama, JCAP 01, 071 (2021), arXiv:2011.03323 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Vagnozzi, JHEAp39, 81 (2023), arXiv:2306.16912 [astro-ph.CO]

    S. Vagnozzi, JHEAp39, 81 (2023), arXiv:2306.16912 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves review

    G. Dom` enech, Universe7, 398 (2021), arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Yuan and Q.-G

    C. Yuan and Q.-G. Huang, iScience24, 102860 (2021), arXiv:2103.04739 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Dom` enech, and G. Franciolini, JCAP10, 041 (2023), arXiv:2307.08552 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermae, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 201401 (2023), arXiv:2306.17149 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

    C. Capriniet al., JCAP03, 024 (2020), arXiv:1910.13125 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24, 1 (2021), arXiv:2008.09136 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Roper Pol, C

    A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, A. Neronov, and D. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. D105, 123502 (2022), arXiv:2201.05630 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rept.121, 263 (1985)

    1985

  37. [37]

    M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rept. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9411342

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  38. [38]

    A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls

    K. Saikawa, Universe3, 40 (2017), arXiv:1703.02576 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Quelquejay Leclereet al.(European Pulsar Tim- ing Array, EPTA), Phys

    H. Quelquejay Leclereet al.(European Pulsar Tim- ing Array, EPTA), Phys. Rev. D108, 123527 (2023), arXiv:2306.12234 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    N. J. Cornish and A. Sesana, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 224005 (2013), arXiv:1305.0326 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  42. [42]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.571, A22 (2014), arXiv:1303.5082 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints on $r$ and $n_s$ Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data

    L. Balkenholet al., (2025), arXiv:2512.10613 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, Phys. Rev. D85, 123537 (2012), arXiv:1203.5849 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    J. L. Cook and L. Sorbo, Phys. Rev. D85, 023534 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 069901 (2012)], arXiv:1109.0022 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion

    R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, JCAP01, 041 (2016), arXiv:1509.07521 [astro- ph.CO]. 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics

    E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and T. Fujita, JCAP 01, 019 (2017), arXiv:1608.04216 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, Phys. Rev. D97, 023532 (2018), arXiv:1706.03765 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Phantom Inflation and Primordial Perturbation Spectrum

    Y.-S. Piao and Y.-Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D70, 063513 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0401231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    G-inflation: inflation driven by the Galileon field

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 231302 (2010), arXiv:1008.0603 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    Solid Inflation

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, and J. Wang, JCAP10, 011 (2013), arXiv:1210.0569 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Blue-tilted Primordial Gravitational Waves from Massive Gravity

    T. Fujita, S. Kuroyanagi, S. Mizuno, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Lett. B789, 215 (2019), arXiv:1808.02381 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and A. Mazumdar, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 27 (2010), arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Prospects of determination of reheating temperature after inflation by DECIGO

    S. Kuroyanagi, K. Nakayama, and J. Yokoyama, PTEP 2015, 013E02 (2015), arXiv:1410.6618 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Prospects for Direct Detection of Inflationary Gravitational Waves by Next Generation Interferometric Detectors

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D83, 043514 (2011), arXiv:1010.5246 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    Lopez, Alexia M., Roger G

    M. Vallisneriet al.(NANOGrav), (2020), 10.3847/1538- 4357/ab7b67, arXiv:2001.00595 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2020

  58. [58]

    R. S. Park, W. M. Folkner, J. G. Williams, and D. H. Boggs, The Astronomical Journal161, 105 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Takahashi, and S. Yokoyama, JCAP 02, 003 (2015), arXiv:1407.4785 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 163001 (2018), arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    M. S. Turner, M. J. White, and J. E. Lidsey, Phys. Rev. D48, 4613 (1993), arXiv:astro-ph/9306029

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  63. [63]

    Precision calculations of the gravitational wave background spectrum from inflation

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D79, 103501 (2009), arXiv:0804.3249 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    Standard Model thermodynamics across the electroweak crossover

    M. Laine and M. Meyer, JCAP07, 035 (2015), arXiv:1503.04935 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Constraints on Neutrino Physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 Full Shape

    W. Elberset al., Phys. Rev. D112, 083513 (2025), arXiv:2503.14744 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    E. Calabreseet al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), JCAP11, 063 (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Cielo, M

    M. Cielo, M. Escudero, G. Mangano, and O. Pisanti, Phys. Rev. D108, L121301 (2023), arXiv:2306.05460 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Sch¨ oneberg, JCAP06, 006 (2024), arXiv:2401.15054 [astro-ph.CO]

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, JCAP06, 006 (2024), arXiv:2401.15054 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2025), arXiv:2508.20721 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    D. H. Lyth and E. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D53, 1784 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9510204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  71. [71]

    Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems

    R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Found. Phys.47, 797 (2017), arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    J. A. Ellis, M. Vallisneri, S. R. Taylor, and P. T. Baker, Zenodo (2020), 10.5281/zenodo.4059815

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4059815 2020

  74. [74]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A49 (2023), arXiv:2306.16225 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Saßnick and C

    J. Ellis and R. v. Haasteren, (2017), 10.5281/zen- odo.1037579

    work page doi:10.5281/zen- 2017

  76. [76]

    Foreman-Mackey, J

    D. Foreman-Mackey, J. Open Source Softw.1, 24 (2016)

    2016

  77. [77]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples

    A. Lewis, JCAP08, 025 (2025), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Tay- lor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del R´ ıo, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. G´ erard-Marchant, K. Shep- pard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant, Nature...

    2020

  79. [79]

    P. D. Laskyet al., Phys. Rev. X6, 011035 (2016), arXiv:1511.05994 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    The Effective Field Theory of Inflation

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, JHEP03, 014 (2008), arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.