REVIEW 21 cited by
Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steering
read the original abstract
The ability to follow instructions is crucial for numerous real-world applications of language models. In pursuit of deeper insights and more powerful capabilities, we derive instruction-specific vector representations from language models and use them to steer models accordingly. These vectors are computed as the difference in activations between inputs with and without instructions, enabling a modular approach to activation steering. We demonstrate how this method can enhance model adherence to constraints such as output format, length, and word inclusion, providing inference-time control over instruction following. Our experiments across four models demonstrate how we can use the activation vectors to guide models to follow constraints even without explicit instructions and to enhance performance when instructions are present. Additionally, we explore the compositionality of activation steering, successfully applying multiple instructions simultaneously. Finally, we demonstrate that steering vectors computed on instruction-tuned models can transfer to improve base models. Our findings demonstrate that activation steering offers a practical and scalable approach for fine-grained control in language generation. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/microsoft/llm-steer-instruct.
Forward citations
Cited by 21 Pith papers
-
Verbalizable Representations Form a Global Workspace in Language Models
Language models represent their current reasoning in a small, readable set of verbalizable vectors (the J-space) that functions like a global workspace.
-
Plans Don't Persist: Why Context Management Is Load Bearing for LLM Agents
Replay pairing shows LLM agents do not persist plans in hidden states but rely on plans remaining in context, with rapid signal decay and task performance drops when plans are evicted.
-
Residual Paving: Diagnosing the Routing Bottleneck in Selective Refusal Editing
Residual Paving decomposes selective refusal editing into an early-layer router for intervention decisions and later-layer residual experts for edits, with oracle routing showing that learned route selectivity is the ...
-
Prompt-Activation Duality: Improving Activation Steering via Attention-Level Interventions
GCAD reduces coherence drift from -18.6 to -1.9 and raises turn-10 trait expression from 78.0 to 93.1 in persona-steering tasks by using gated attention-delta interventions from system prompts.
-
Instruction Tuning Changes How Upstream State Conditions Late Readout: A Cross-Patching Diagnostic
Instruction tuning makes late-layer computation depend more on the model's own post-trained upstream state than on base-model upstream state, producing a consistent +1.68 logit interaction effect across five model families.
-
RACC: Representation-Aware Coverage Criteria for LLM Safety Testing
RACC defines six representation-aware coverage criteria that score jailbreak test suites by measuring activation of safety concepts extracted from LLM hidden states on a calibration set.
-
The Computational Basis of Confidence in Large Language Models
Answer-logit differences in multimodal LMs behave as monotonic readouts of a latent decision variable in simple perceptual and memory tasks, but not in complex visual reasoning.
-
The Computational Basis of Confidence in Large Language Models
Answer-logit differences in multimodal LLMs satisfy statistical decision confidence signatures, behaving as monotonic readouts of a latent decision variable rather than heuristic preference scores.
-
Answer Engineering: Local Trajectory Editing for Protocol-Constrained Decision Making in Large Language Models
Answer Engineering uses local trajectory editing during autoregressive generation to raise protocol compliance on a clinical SSNHL benchmark from 25.1% to 83.5% and balanced accuracy from 42.0% to 80.7%.
-
Steer Where It Matters: Token-Level Visual-Sensitivity Steering for LVLMs Hallucination Mitigation
TLVS mitigates hallucinations in LVLMs via token-level extraction and visual-sensitivity-adaptive steering applied only at critical decoding steps.
-
Activation Steering for Synthetic Data Generation: The Role of Diversity in Downstream Safety Detection
Activation steering produces synthetic safety-violating data that improves downstream classifiers over prompting on most tested concepts when a harmonic mean of alignment, coherence, and diversity is optimized.
-
Enabling Performant and Flexible Model-Internal Observability for LLM Inference
DMI-Lib delivers 0.4-6.8% overhead for offline batch LLM inference and ~6% for moderate online serving while exposing rich internal signals across backends, cutting latency overhead 2-15x versus prior observability baselines.
-
Prompt-Activation Duality: Improving Activation Steering via Attention-Level Interventions
GCAD steering extracts prompt-based attention deltas and gates them at token level, cutting coherence drift from -18.6 to -1.9 while raising trait expression at turn 10 from 78 to 93 on multi-turn persona benchmarks.
-
Do Large Language Models Plan Answer Positions? Position Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Generation
LLMs implicitly plan answer positions during MCQ generation, as shown by predictive signals in hidden representations and controllable shifts via activation steering.
-
How LLMs Detect and Correct Their Own Errors: The Role of Internal Confidence Signals
LLMs implement a second-order confidence architecture where the PANL activation encodes both error likelihood and the ability to correct it, beyond verbal confidence or log-probabilities.
-
When Correct Beliefs Collapse: Epistemic Resilience of LLMs under Clinical Pressure
Frontier LLMs abandon initially correct medical diagnoses under escalating clinical pressure, and resilience-oriented fine-tuning nearly eliminates this belief collapse.
-
Causal Evidence that Language Models use Confidence to Drive Behavior
Language models deploy multidimensional internal confidence representations and threshold-based policies to control abstention behavior, with causal support from activation steering experiments.
-
Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following
Introduces IFBench benchmark with 58 new constraints and demonstrates RLVR training improves generalization of language models to unseen verifiable output constraints.
-
Steered Generation via Gradient-Based Optimization on Sparse Query Features
Prototype-Based Sparse Steering decomposes query activations with SAEs and optimizes sparse features via gradients to steer LLM outputs toward specific behaviors.
-
MemOS: A Memory OS for AI System
MemOS introduces a unified memory management framework for LLMs using MemCubes to handle and evolve different memory types for improved controllability and evolvability.
-
ReGA: Model-Based Safeguard for LLMs via Representation-Guided Abstraction
ReGA uses safety-critical representations to guide abstraction in model-based analysis, enabling scalable detection of harmful LLM inputs with reported AUROC of 0.975 at prompt level.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.