Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 255 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

New method decodes galactic bar orbits across timescales

2026-07-09 15:40 UTC pith:MRS7FFTW

load-bearing objection Useful action-angle toolkit for barred galaxies; averaging theory has a real but non-fatal gap near resonance overlap the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07262 v1 pith:MRS7FFTW submitted 2026-07-08 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

GalPort: Investigation of the bar in action-angle space

Viktor D. Zozulia This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM
keywords galactic dynamicsaction-angle variablesbarred galaxiesorbital classificationresonance trappingN-body simulationsperturbation theoryHamiltonian systems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces GalPort, a Python package that tracks how stars move inside barred galaxies by computing their action-angle variables (quantities that describe orbital shape and position) at multiple timescales simultaneously. The key innovation is an averaging algorithm that smooths away short-period fluctuations to reveal the slow resonant dynamics governing whether a star is trapped inside the bar, circulates past it, or swings through a resonance. Applied to an N-body galaxy simulation, the method produces a dynamical decomposition of the bar into its constituent orbital families and yields analytic two-dimensional Hamiltonians that capture the bar's phase-space structure.

Core claim

The central claim is that one can recover meaningful averaged action-angle variables for individual orbits in a time-varying non-axisymmetric galactic potential by piecewise-averaging instantaneous actions between successive apocentres and vertical extrema, then applying mean-preserving splines. This procedure suppresses fast oscillatory perturbations and yields variables governed by the resonant (slow) part of the Hamiltonian, enabling orbit classification by whether the resonant angle librates, circulates, or transits between regimes.

What carries the argument

Mean-preserving quadratic splines applied to piecewise-averaged actions and frequencies, computed between successive orbital turning points (apocentres for radial motion, z-maxima and z-minima for vertical motion), producing smooth time series that approximate the dynamics of the averaged Hamiltonian near resonances.

Load-bearing premise

The averaging algorithm is perturbatively justified for orbits near a single resonance, but the bar Hamiltonian involves two simultaneous slow resonant angles; the paper does not rigorously bridge this gap, relying instead on empirical validation through the N-body demonstration.

What would settle it

If orbits classified as librating by the averaged-angle method systematically fail to satisfy independent resonance-trapping criteria (e.g., frequency analysis or direct Poincaré sections), the classification scheme would be unreliable.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The method enables tracking how individual stars join or leave the bar over cosmic time, providing a particle-by-particle history of bar growth and trapping.
  • Secular action-angle variables reveal fine structure in the frequency-ratio plane that instantaneous axisymmetric estimates obscure, potentially improving dynamical modelling of the Milky Way bar from Gaia data.
  • The two-dimensional fitted Hamiltonians for bar-aligned orbits offer a compact analytical portrait of phase-space geometry that could replace expensive full three-dimensional Fourier computations for bar structure analysis.
  • Orbit classification by resonant-angle behaviour (libration vs. circulation vs. swing-by) provides a time-localised alternative to frequency-analysis methods, which are constrained by fixed time windows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the averaging procedure generalises to potentials with multiple overlapping resonances beyond the ILR and vILR pair considered here, it could become a standard tool for studying resonance overlap and chaotic diffusion in galactic discs more broadly.
  • The fitted two-dimensional Hamiltonians could be chained across time snapshots to produce a movie of separatrix migration, offering a quantitative measure of how much stellar mass crosses the bar boundary per unit time.
  • Applying the same averaging strategy to real stellar data (e.g., Gaia) rather than simulations would require orbit integration in an assumed potential; the method's sensitivity to potential errors is not explored and may limit direct observational application.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper presents GalPort, a Python package for analyzing the orbital dynamics of evolving disc galaxy N-body models in action-angle space. The package implements numerical methods for estimating actions, angles, and frequencies across particle-specific timescales: instantaneous (short-term), averaged (medium-term, associated with radial/vertical oscillations), and secular (long-term, associated with libration/circulation near resonances). The key algorithmic contributions are: (1) a mean-preserving spline averaging procedure that eliminates short-term oscillations from instantaneous action-angle variables computed via the Stäckel fudge method, yielding variables approximating the averaged Hamiltonian dynamics; (2) an orbit classification scheme based on resonant angle behavior (positive/negative circulation, libration, resonance passage); and (3) a phase-portrait fitting procedure that fits an analytical two-dimensional Hamiltonian to orbit ensembles in the (J, theta) plane. The package is demonstrated on an N-body model of a barred galaxy, producing action/frequency distributions, a dynamical decomposition (48% bar, 40% disc, 11% central, 0.5% x2), and phase-space portraits of bar orbits. The code is publicly available under an MIT license.

Significance. The paper addresses a genuine methodological gap: while action-angle variables are well-established for axisymmetric systems (via AGAMA, Galpy), their practical computation and interpretation in evolving non-axisymmetric potentials—particularly for bar dynamics—remains challenging. The package's ability to compute time series of averaged and secular action-angle variables simultaneously at all simulation timesteps, with particle-specific averaging windows, is a useful contribution. The orbit classification scheme based on angle evolution rather than frequency analysis is a practical alternative that avoids fixed time-window constraints. The phase-portrait fitting procedure, which condenses many orbits into a single analytical Hamiltonian, is a novel and potentially valuable tool. The public release of the code under MIT license is commendable and enhances reproducibility. The work builds on the authors' prior theoretical papers (Zozulia et al. 2024a,b, 2025) but the algorithmic implementation and fitting procedure constitute new contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. Sec. 3.1.2 and Appendix A: The averaging procedure is justified perturbatively in Appendix A for the case of two slow angles and one fast angle (Eq. 28-33), which is the relevant configuration for the bar Hamiltonian (Eq. 18). However, the error analysis is first-order perturbation theory assuming clean frequency separation between fast and slow angles. Near resonance overlap or for orbits with large libration amplitudes approaching the separatrix, this separation degrades. The paper does not systematically test the averaging procedure's accuracy in these regimes, nor does it compare averaged variables against independent methods (e.g., frequency analysis) on the same orbits. Given that the bar region is precisely where resonance overlap and large-amplitude libration occur, some quantitative validation—even on a small subset of orbits—would substantially strengthen the paper's central方法论
  2. Sec. 3.1.2: The empirical parameters for apocentre merging (eccentricity cutoff 0.1, period ratio threshold 1.4) and the interpolation factor (100x via cubic spline) are stated as 'empirically determined through extensive numerical experiments' but no sensitivity analysis is provided. Since these parameters affect frequency estimates and could introduce systematic biases, a brief discussion of how robust the results are to their variation would be appropriate, particularly for the frequency distributions in Fig. 4 that are used to argue against using instantaneous axisymmetric frequencies.
  3. Sec. 3.3, Eq. (27): The phase-portrait fitting procedure minimizes a loss function with a weighting factor w_theta (stated as typically unity with 'negligible' effect), but no justification is given for the particular form of the loss function (why normalize by sqrt(J_i) and 2*pi respectively?). Additionally, the polynomial representation of h(J) as sum of a_k * J^(k/2) is motivated by the epicycle approximation, but the maximum order n_max and k_max are not specified in the main text. For reproducibility, these choices and their impact on the fitted Hamiltonian should be documented.
minor comments (8)
  1. Sec. 2.2: The sentence containing 'Fortunately, even unperturbed axisymmetric action-angle variables...' has a stray period before it ('. . Fortunately'), creating a formatting artifact.
  2. Sec. 2.3, Table 1: The table header says 'up to 7-th order' but the 'Order' column values (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) appear to count the sum of absolute values of the integer coefficients in the angle combination, not the perturbation order per se. Clarifying this terminology would avoid confusion.
  3. Sec. 3.1.1: The statement 'we do not recommend using instantaneous frequencies, even for rough estimates' is strong. It would help to quantify the typical systematic offset (the 'constant value that varies between individual orbits' mentioned in Eq. 20) to give readers a sense of magnitude.
  4. Fig. 3: The 'mean secular' panels are described as secular actions averaged between t=350 and t=450 with resolution 5 time units. It would help to state how many averaging intervals this corresponds to and whether the structures visible are robust to this window choice.
  5. Sec. 4.3: The 'Not disc, not bar' component (11%) is described with three circulation criteria that are model-specific. The text notes 'in other models, these orbits may have other angular behaviour.' Given this caveat, it would be useful to flag this classification as provisional in the figure caption or the text more prominently.
  6. Sec. 4.4, Fig. 6: The Poincaré maps for instantaneous vs. averaged variables are compared, and it is stated that averaged variables 'do not alter the position of the fixed point.' This is an important claim; a brief quantitative comparison (e.g., fixed point location shift) would strengthen it.
  7. The paper references 'BT8' and 'BT08' for Binney & Tremaine (2008) inconsistently (Sec. 2.1 uses 'BT8', Sec. 2.1 Stäckel section uses 'BT8', while Sec. 2.1 cylindrical section uses 'BT08'). Standardize.
  8. Sec. 4.1: The time unit conversion (13.8 Myr per time unit) is given but the pattern speed Omega_p value is not explicitly stated, though it appears in figures. Stating it in the text would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity. The paper is a methods/software paper whose core algorithms are independently defined and demonstrated on an external N-body model.

full rationale

The paper introduces the GalPort package for computing action-angle variables on multiple timescales. The core numerical methods (Stäckel fudge via AGAMA, mean-preserving splines, orbit classification by angle behavior, phase-portrait fitting) are defined self-contained within the paper. The N-body model used for demonstration is from Smirnov and Sotnikova (2018), an independent source. The bar Hamiltonian framework (Eq. 18) and the orbit classification scheme draw on the author's prior work (Zozulia et al. 2024a,b, 2025), but these citations provide theoretical context and motivation, not the load-bearing justification for the algorithms themselves. The phase-portrait fitting (Sec. 3.3) fits a polynomial Hamiltonian to orbit data and then uses it to visualize phase-space structure; this is a descriptive fit, not a prediction claimed to be independently derived. The averaging procedure's perturbative justification (Appendix A) is derived within the paper for the two-slow-angle case. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by definition or by a self-citation chain that is itself unverified. The self-citations are normal scholarly practice for a methods paper building on prior theoretical work, and the central algorithmic content is independently testable (the code is public). The only minor concern is that the bar Hamiltonian framework and classification criteria originate from the author's own prior work, but these are not presented as novel predictions or first-principles derivations in this paper—they are stated as adopted tools. This does not constitute circularity in the sense of a result being forced by its own definitions or fits. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation load without independent content being compromised.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, or forces. The free parameters are all numerical/algorithmic thresholds empirically tuned for the averaging and fitting procedures. The axioms are standard domain assumptions in galactic dynamics, except for the averaging extension to two-resonance systems, which is specific to this work and lacks rigorous justification.

free parameters (6)
  • Eccentricity cutoff for apocentre merging = 0.1
    Empirically determined threshold for merging consecutive apocentres when radial period changes rapidly (Sec. 3.1.2).
  • Period ratio threshold for apocentre merging = 1.4
    Empirically determined factor for detecting anomalous radial periods (Sec. 3.1.2).
  • Interpolation factor for time resolution = 100
    Cubic spline interpolation factor applied to the native time resolution of 0.125 (Sec. 3.1.2).
  • Multipole expansion order = 12
    Maximum order of meridional angle expansion for potential computation (Sec. 4.1).
  • Weighting factor w_theta in phase-portrait fitting = 1.0 (default)
    Fine-tuning parameter for the angular derivative contribution in the loss function (Eq. 27, Sec. 3.3).
  • Maximum polynomial order n_max in Hamiltonian fitting = not specified
    Order of the angle expansion in the fitted Hamiltonian (Eq. 19); specific value used for demonstrations not stated.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Most orbits in galactic potentials are regular (periodic or quasi-periodic) and possess three integrals of motion.
    Invoked in Sec. 1 and underlies the entire action-angle framework. Standard in galactic dynamics.
  • domain assumption The non-axisymmetric perturbation is small: delta_Phi << Phi.
    Stated in Sec. 2.2 (Eq. 6 context). Required for first-order perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption The bar pattern speed Omega_p is constant.
    Assumed in the Hamiltonian formulation (Sec. 2.2). Real bars slow down, which the paper acknowledges but does not fully address in the theoretical framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The averaging procedure over fast angles recovers the dynamics of the averaged Hamiltonian near resonances.
    Justified perturbatively in Appendix A for single-resonance cases, but extended heuristically to the two-resonance bar Hamiltonian (Eq. 18) without rigorous proof.
  • domain assumption The Stäckel fudge method provides adequate instantaneous action estimates for non-axisymmetric systems.
    Used throughout for instantaneous actions (Sec. 3.1.1). Standard approximation with known limitations.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 37184 in / 2777 out tokens · 400629 ms · 2026-07-09T15:40:34.657141+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

GalPort is a Python package for analysing the orbital dynamics of evolving disc galaxy numerical models in action-angle space. The package implements novel numerical methods for efficiently estimating actions, angles, and frequencies across different, particle-specific timescales: on the scale of radial or vertical oscillation and on the resonant libration/circulation timescale. The algorithm allows calculation of these dynamic quantities simultaneously at all time steps of the simulated galactic evolution. With this tool, one can trace orbital behaviour within time-varying galactic potentials and classify orbits (resonantly trapped, circulating, or passing through a resonance) based on their angle evolution. GalPort also includes specialised options for analysing the phase-space structure of a galactic bar in the disc plane and along its major axis. We demonstrate the package's performance on a typical N-body model of a barred galaxy, obtaining the global distributions of actions and frequencies and performing a detailed orbital decomposition. The code is publicly available under the MIT license at: https://github.com/vdzozulia/galport

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07262 by Viktor D. Zozulia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panel: the orbit of the bar particle of the 𝑁-body model over the time interval from 𝑡 = 300 to 𝑡 = 500. The middle and right panels show the evolution of 𝐽𝑅 and 𝐽𝑧 of this orbit on different time-scales (instantaneous or short-term, average or medium-term and secular or long-term). Piecewise function demonstrate the mean value of instantaneous action between apocentre for 𝐽𝑅 and between minima and ma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: The potential of the 𝑁-body model at time moment 𝑡 = 400 on the 𝑥𝑦 and 𝑥𝑧 plane. The major axis of a bar aligns along the 𝑥 axis. Examples of pure resonant orbits in the inner Lindblad resonance (ILR, x1), in the ultraharmonic resonance (4:1) and in corotation resonance (CR) are presented on the 𝑥𝑦-plane. All these orbits are found in the triaxial potential. Right panel: The dependence of frequ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-dimensional distributions of the 𝑁-body galaxy in the action space at the moment 𝑡 = 400. They obtained on different time scales: instantaneous or agama actions, medium-term or averaged, long-term or secular, and secular actions averaged between 350 and 450 time moments (mean secular). The distributions are shown on the plane (𝐿𝑧 , 𝐽𝑅 ) for the top panels and on the plane (𝐿𝑧 , 𝐽𝑧 ) for the bottom ones… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional distributions of 𝑁-body galaxy in space of frequencies fraction (2(Ω𝜑 − Ω𝑝 )∕Ω𝑅 , Ω𝑧∕Ω𝑅 ). Frequencies are calculated for the same time scales as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The dynamic decomposition of the 𝑁-body model. Upper row, left direction: All model orbits, the bar orbits (2𝜃𝜙 − 𝜃𝑅 librates around 0), orbits near x2 (2𝜃𝜙 − 𝜃𝑅 librate around 0), particles that do not belong to the bar or disc and disc particles. Central row: particles in ultraharmonic resonance (4𝜃𝜙−𝜃𝑅 librates around the 0 or 𝜋 or pass through these angles) and corotation particles (2𝜃𝜙 librates around… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The structure of the action-angle space (𝐽𝑅 , 2𝜃𝜙 − 𝜃𝑅 ) for orbits in the disc plane with the fixed Jacobi integral of −1.8. Four left panels demonstrate Poincaré maps. Points correspond to apocentres (𝜃𝑅 = 0) and pericentres (𝜃𝑅 = 𝜋) for instantaneous and averaged variables. Right panel: Coloured lines correspond to the evolution of average actions and angles of some orbits. Black lines correspond to iso… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The evolution of bar-aligned 3D orbits on the plane (𝜃𝑧 − 𝜃𝑅 , 𝐽𝑧 (blue lines). The Jacobi integral equals −1.8 for all of them. Examples of some orbits are shown on 𝑥𝑦 and 𝑥𝑧 planes. Both face-on and edge on views are displayed in the square (−2.5, 2.5) × (−1.5, 1.5). The black lines on the central plot correspond to isolines of the two-dimensional fitted Hamiltonian 𝐻2d(𝜃𝑧 − 𝜃𝑅 , 𝐽𝑧 ) (Sec. 3.3). The ora… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

255 extracted references · 255 canonical work pages · 117 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    On the orbits that generate the X-shape in the Milky Way bulge. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1262 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1262

  2. [2]

    Bar pattern speeds in CALIFA galaxies. I. Fast bars across the Hubble sequence. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423383 , archivePrefix =. 1501.05498 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423383

  3. [3]

    Bar formation and destruction in the FIRE-2 simulations

    Bar Formation and Destruction in the FIRE-2 Simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b45 , archivePrefix =. 2309.16811 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b45

  4. [4]

    A Theoretical Study of the Stability of Disk Galaxies and Planetary Rings

    work page

  5. [5]

    , eprint =

    Comparing peanut-shaped `bulges' to N-body simulations and orbital calculations. , eprint =. doi:10.1023/A:1024048600687 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1024048600687

  6. [6]

    On the stability of tidal streams in action space

    On the Stability of Tidal Streams in Action Space. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac93fb , archivePrefix =. 2207.13481 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac93fb

  7. [7]

    Mathematical methods of classical mechanics

    work page

  8. [8]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    The existence and shapes of dust lanes in galactic bars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.345 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.345

  9. [9]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Morphology of bar orbits. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.328 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/259.2.328

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    What determines the strength and the slowdown rate of bars?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x 2003

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    On the nature of bulges in general and of box/peanut bulges in particular: input from N-body simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08872.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08872.x 2005

  12. [12]

    Secular Evolution of Galaxies , year = 2013, editor =

    Bars and secular evolution in disk galaxies: Theoretical input. Secular Evolution of Galaxies , year = 2013, editor =

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Boxy/peanut/X bulges, barlenses and the thick part of galactic bars: What are they and how did they form?

    Boxy/Peanut/X Bulges, Barlenses and the Thick Part of Galactic Bars: What Are They and How Did They Form?. Galactic Bulges , year = 2016, series =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_14 , adsnote =. arXiv:1503.04804 , editor =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_14 2016

  14. [14]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Bi-symmetric instabilities of the Kuz'min/Toomre disc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. 1986. doi:10.1093/mnras/221.2.213 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/221.2.213 1986

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Morphology, photometry and kinematics of N -body bars - I. Three models with different halo central concentrations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05028.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05028.x 2002

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Orbits as building blocks of a barred galaxy model. , keywords =. 1983

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    Bar formation and evolution in disc galaxies with gas and a triaxial halo: Morphology, bar strength and halo properties

    Bar formation and evolution in disc galaxies with gas and a triaxial halo: morphology, bar strength and halo properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts452 , archivePrefix =. 1211.6754 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sts452 2013

  18. [18]

    On the nature of the barlens component in barred galaxies: what do boxy/peanut bulges look like when viewed face-on?

    On the nature of the barlens component in barred galaxies: what do boxy/peanut bulges look like when viewed face-on?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. 2015. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2231 , archivePrefix =. 1405.6726 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2231 2015

  19. [19]

    Orbital support and evolution of flat profiles of bars (shoulders)

    Orbital Support and Evolution of Flat Profiles of Bars (Shoulders). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace976 , archivePrefix =. 2303.04828 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace976

  20. [20]

    Bars in Disk-Dominated and Bulge-Dominated Galaxies at z~0: New Insights from ~3600 SDSS Galaxies

    Bars in Disk-dominated and Bulge-dominated Galaxies at z -0.5ex 0: New Insights from -0.5ex 3600 SDSS Galaxies. , keywords =. 2008. doi:10.1086/526510 , archivePrefix =. 0710.4674 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/526510 2008

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/324446a0 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1038/324446a0

  22. [22]

    1998, MNRAS, 299, 433, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01828.x

    Gas-driven evolution of stellar orbits in barred galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01836.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01836.x 1998

  23. [23]

    , eprint =

    Gas Feedback on Stellar Bar Evolution. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/520531 , adsnote =

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/520531

  24. [24]

    Dynamics of early-type galaxies. II. The rotation curve of the S0 galaxy NGC 128. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/154980 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1086/154980

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Study of NGC 4442 : a link between bars and boxy bulges. , keywords =. 1994

    work page 1994

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Models of our Galaxy - II. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18268.x , archivePrefix =. 1101.0747 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18268.x 2011

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Actions for axisymmetric potentials. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21757.x , archivePrefix =. 1207.4910 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21757.x 2012

  28. [28]

    Torus mapper: a code for dynamical models of galaxies

    Torus mapper: a code for dynamical models of galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2734 , archivePrefix =. 1511.07754 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2734

  29. [29]

    Managing resonant trapped orbits in our Galaxy

    Managing resonant-trapped orbits in our Galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1795 , archivePrefix =. 1608.01633 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1795

  30. [30]

    Orbital tori for non-axisymmetric galaxies

    Orbital tori for non-axisymmetric galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2835 , archivePrefix =. 1710.11360 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2835

  31. [31]

    Angle-action variables for orbits trapped at a Lindblad resonance

    Angle-action variables for orbits trapped at a Lindblad resonance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa092 , archivePrefix =. 1912.07026 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa092 1912

  32. [32]

    Trapped orbits and solar-neighbourhood kinematics

    Trapped orbits and solar-neighbourhood kinematics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1103 , archivePrefix =. 1912.07023 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1103 1912

  33. [33]

    Self-consistent models of our Galaxy

    Self-consistent models of our Galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad094 , archivePrefix =. 2206.03523 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad094

  34. [34]

    Chemodynamical models of our Galaxy

    Chemodynamical models of our Galaxy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3312 , archivePrefix =. 2306.11602 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3312

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Spectral stellar dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/159559 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1086/159559

  36. [36]

    ISBN 978-0-691-13026-2 (HB)

    Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition, by James Binney and Scott Tremaine. ISBN 978-0-691-13026-2 (HB). Published by Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ USA, 2008. , year =

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    galpy: A Python Library for Galactic Dynamics

    galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , archivePrefix =. 1412.3451 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

  38. [38]

    Gas accretion on spiral galaxies: bar formation and renewal

    Gas accretion on spiral galaxies: Bar formation and renewal. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020920 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0206273 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020920

  39. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    The lifetime of galactic bars: central mass concentrations and gravity torques. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00096.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0509126 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00096.x 2005

  40. [40]

    The Nature of Boxy/Peanut-Shaped Bulges in Spiral Galaxies

    The Nature of Boxy/Peanut-Shaped Bulges in Spiral Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/300922 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9904015 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300922

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    K-band observations of boxy bulges - I. Morphology and surface brightness profiles. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10471.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10471.x 2006

  42. [42]

    A Classical Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S4G)

    A Classical Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in the Spitzer Survey of Stellar Structure in Galaxies (S4G). , keywords =. 2015. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/32 , archivePrefix =. 1501.00454 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/32 2015

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Resonances in barred galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12001.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12001.x 2007

  44. [44]

    Resonance sweeping by a decelerating Galactic bar

    Resonance sweeping by a decelerating Galactic bar. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3585 , archivePrefix =. 1912.04304 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3585 1912

  45. [45]

    Tree-ring structure of Galactic bar resonance

    Tree-ring structure of Galactic bar resonance. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1094 , archivePrefix =. 2102.08388 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1094

  46. [46]

    Oscillating dynamical friction on galactic bars by trapped dark matter

    Oscillating dynamical friction on galactic bars by trapped dark matter. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac697 , archivePrefix =. 2109.10910 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac697

  47. [47]

    Dynamical friction and feedback on galactic bars in the general fast-slow regime

    Dynamical friction and feedback on galactic bars in the general fast-slow regime. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2324 , archivePrefix =. 2305.00022 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2324

  48. [48]

    Stellar Kinematics of Boxy Bulges: Large-Scale Bars and Inner Disks

    Stellar Kinematics of Boxy Bulges: Large-Scale Bars and Inner Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/420988 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0403232 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/420988

  49. [49]

    Violent Buckling Benefits Galactic Bars

    Violent buckling benefits galactic bars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3625 , archivePrefix =. 1912.08190 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3625 1912

  50. [50]

    Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Disks , year = 2008, editor =

    Secular Evolution of Disk Galaxies. Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Disks , year = 2008, editor =

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

    Pattern speed evolution and bar reformation. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

    work page

  52. [52]

    Galaxy Dynamics: Secular Evolution and Accretion

    Galaxy Dynamics: Secular Evolution and Accretion. Astrophysical Dynamics: From Stars to Galaxies , year = 2011, editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921311017522 , archivePrefix =. 1007.2979 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/s1743921311017522 2011

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Formation and properties of persisting stellar bars. , keywords =

    work page

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Box and peanut shapes generated by stellar bars. , keywords =

    work page

  55. [55]

    Nonlinear theory

    Inner Lindblad resonance in galaxies. Nonlinear theory. I. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/153922 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/153922

  56. [56]

    , volume =

    How Far Do Bars Extend , author =. , volume =. 1980

    work page 1980

  57. [57]

    Order and chaos in dynamical astronomy

    work page

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Orbits in weak and strong bars. , keywords =. 1980

    work page 1980

  59. [59]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    3D chaotic diffusion in barred spiral galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1640 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1640

  60. [60]

    The Tully-Fisher Relation of Barred Galaxies

    The Tully-Fisher Relation of Barred Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/376754 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0305521 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/376754

  61. [61]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    An analytic inversion for anisotropic spherical galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/253.3.414 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/253.3.414

  62. [62]

    Constraints from Dynamical Friction on the Dark Matter Content of Barred Galaxies

    Constraints from Dynamical Friction on the Dark Matter Content of Barred Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317148 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0006275 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/317148

  63. [63]

    , eprint =

    The Kinematic Signature of Face-On Peanut-shaped Bulges. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/431292 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1086/431292

  64. [64]

    , eprint =

    The Secular Evolution of Disk Structural Parameters. , eprint =. doi:10.1086/504147 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1086/504147

  65. [65]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Separation of stellar populations by an evolving bar: implications for the bulge of the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx947 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx947

  66. [66]

    Box/peanut-shaped bulges in action space

    Box/peanut-shaped bulges in action space. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2568 , archivePrefix =. 1911.01084 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2568 1911

  67. [67]

    Azimuthal metallicity variations, spiral structure, and the failure of radial actions based on assuming axisymmetry

    Azimuthal metallicity variations, spiral structure, and the failure of radial actions based on assuming axisymmetry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf035 , archivePrefix =. 2402.08356 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/staf035

  68. [68]

    Journal of Computational Physics , eprint =

    A Hierarchical 0 ( N ) Force Calculation Algorithm. Journal of Computational Physics , eprint =. doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7026 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7026 2002

  69. [69]

    1998, MNRAS, 299, 433, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01828.x

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , eprint =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01600.x , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01600.x 1998

  70. [70]

    Deconstructing double-barred galaxies in 2D and 3D. I. Classical nature of the dominant bulges

    Deconstructing double-barred galaxies in 2D and 3D - I. Classical nature of the dominant bulges. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3520 , archivePrefix =. 1901.02684 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3520 2019

  71. [71]

    Radial halo substructure in harmony with the Galactic bar

    Radial halo substructure in harmony with the Galactic bar. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1789 , archivePrefix =. 2402.14907 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1789

  72. [72]

    A new resonance-like feature in the outer disc of the Milky Way

    A new resonance-like feature in the outer disc of the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244605 , archivePrefix =. 2207.12977 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244605

  73. [73]

    Double-barred galaxies. I. A catalog of barred galaxies with stellar secondary bars and inner disks. , keywords =. 2004. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034408 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0310806 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034408 2004

  74. [74]

    Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =

    Double-barred galaxies. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi , keywords =. 2011

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Peanuts at an angle: detecting and measuring the three-dimensional structure of bars in moderately inclined galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt385 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt385

  76. [76]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Caught in the Act: Direct Detection of Galactic Bars in the Buckling Phase. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/L30 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/825/2/l30 2041

  77. [77]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The frequency and stellar-mass dependence of boxy/peanut-shaped bulges in barred galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx620 , adsnote =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx620

  78. [78]

    Composite Bulges: The Coexistence of Classical Bulges and Disky Pseudobulges in S0 and Spiral Galaxies

    Composite bulges: the coexistence of classical bulges and discy pseudo-bulges in S0 and spiral galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2376 , archivePrefix =. 1411.2599 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2376

  79. [79]

    Classical bulges and nuclear discs in barred galaxies: the contrasting cases of NGC 4608 and NGC 4643

    Composite bulges - II. Classical bulges and nuclear discs in barred galaxies: the contrasting cases of NGC 4608 and NGC 4643. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab126 , archivePrefix =. 2101.05321 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab126

  80. [80]

    The Frequency of Barred Spiral Galaxies in the Near-IR

    The Frequency of Barred Spiral Galaxies in the Near-Infrared. , keywords =. 2000. doi:10.1086/301203 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9910479 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/301203 2000

Showing first 80 references.