Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

A single Hawking pair begins carrying information out of a de Sitter horizon at Euclidean time τ ≈ β/8, traced by an inverse mini-Page curve.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 05:01 UTC pith:OEGUTFIL

load-bearing objection Clean algebraic calculation of an inverse mini-Page curve for a single Hawking pair in centaur geometry; the eta/8 minimum is real within free-field large-mass approximations but its physical reading as “information escape” is model-dependent. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08737 v1 pith:OEGUTFIL submitted 2026-07-09 hep-th gr-qc

The mini-Page Curve in Cosmology

Ricardo Esp\'indola , Shoichiro Miyashita This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords mini-Page curvecosmological horizonde Sittercentaur geometrycrossed productHawking pairmodular flowscrambling time
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks when an individual Hawking pair starts carrying quantum information out of a cosmological horizon, the de Sitter analogue of the black-hole information-release problem. It studies two-dimensional flow geometries that glue an asymptotic AdS2 boundary to a dS2 static patch (the sharp centaur solution). A probe Hawking-pair state is built by acting with a local boundary operator and its modular-conjugate mirror on the thermofield-double state. The algebra of observables is enlarged by the crossed-product construction so that a well-defined entropy difference ΔS can be computed. That difference traces an inverse mini-Page curve: it starts near zero, falls to a minimum near τ ≈ β/8, then rises again. The authors interpret the minimum as the microscopic moment information begins to leave the horizon. In the microcanonical ensemble the same algebraic entropy equals the generalized entropy of an entanglement-wedge cut that tracks the emitted particle, and the relative modular flow between the two states produces the Lyapunov exponent 2π/β, identifying the scrambling time when the information becomes accessible to a static-patch observer.

Core claim

The entropy difference ΔS between the thermofield-double reference state and a modular-conjugate Hawking-pair probe state, evaluated inside the crossed-product Type II∞ algebra of the centaur geometry, traces an inverse mini-Page curve that reaches its minimum near Euclidean time τ ≈ β/8; that minimum is the time at which quantum information begins to escape the cosmological horizon.

What carries the argument

The crossed-product Type II∞ algebra obtained by adjoining the modular Hamiltonian to the centaur algebra of observables; it supplies a trace that cleanly separates the gravitational contribution ΔS_grav from the Araki relative-entropy piece, allowing ΔS to be computed from free-field Wick contractions of the centaur two-point function.

Load-bearing premise

That free-field Wick contractions of the large-mass geodesic two-point function (which discards every trajectory that enters the dS region) faithfully capture the information content of a single Hawking pair, so the gravitational piece alone shapes the curve while the relative-entropy piece vanishes except at the transition.

What would settle it

Recompute ΔS with the subdominant geodesics that enter the dS hemisphere retained in the two-point function, or with interacting matter; if the minimum of the inverse mini-Page curve moves appreciably away from τ = β/8 or disappears, the claimed escape time is false.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies information transfer across cosmological horizons in two-dimensional flow geometries (sharp centaur solutions) that interpolate between asymptotic AdS_{2} and a dS_{2} static patch. A Hawking-pair probe state is constructed by acting on the thermofield-double state with a local operator and its modular conjugate. The centaur algebra is promoted to a Type II_∞ factor via the crossed product, allowing a well-defined entropy difference ΔS between the reference and probe states. Using the large-mass geodesic approximation for the Euclidean two-point function (which is dominated by AdS-staying trajectories) together with replica and Araki calculations, the authors obtain an inverse mini-Page curve for ΔS that reaches a minimum near τ ≈ β/8; they interpret this location as the Euclidean time at which the pair begins to carry information out of the cosmological horizon. In the microcanonical ensemble the algebraic entropy is identified with the generalized entropy of an entanglement-wedge cut that tracks the emitted particle, and the relative modular flow yields a Lyapunov exponent λ = 2π/β that sets the scrambling time.

Significance. If the identification of the τ ≈ β/8 minimum with the onset of information escape is robust, the work supplies a concrete, algebraically controlled microscopic timescale for information transfer across a cosmological horizon—an analogue of the black-hole mini-Page results of Verlinde et al. that has been largely missing for de Sitter. The combination of the crossed-product construction, the explicit centaur two-point function, the Wall-type matching of algebraic and generalized entropy, and the extraction of a Lyapunov exponent from relative modular flow constitutes a technically coherent package that advances the algebraic approach to quantum information in cosmological settings. The free-field and large-mass approximations limit the claim’s domain of validity, but the framework itself is reusable and the calculations are transparent.

major comments (2)
  1. The central interpretive claim (abstract and §5) equates the location of the ΔS minimum at τ ≈ β/8 with the Euclidean time at which a Hawking pair begins to carry information out of the cosmological horizon. That location is fixed by the switch between mirror and crossing Wick channels of the free-field four-point function (Eqs. 5.7–5.9 and 5.13). Those channels rest on the large-mass geodesic approximation of §4.3 that discards every dS-entering trajectory because its on-shell action is longer (Eqs. 4.33 vs. 4.35). Once interactions or finite-mass corrections are admitted, the relative weights of the channels can shift, moving or eliminating the extremum of ΔS_grav. The subsequent physical identification of the β/8 scale therefore inherits an uncontrolled approximation; the algebraic construction is sound, but the robustness of the timescale needs either a controlled estimate of correct
  2. In §5.3 the Araki relative-entropy contribution is argued to vanish everywhere except in a narrow window around the transition point (where it equals log 2). This cancellation relies on the free-field factorization of the 2n-point function on the replica manifold into identical nearest-neighbour pairings that are independent of the replica index n (Eq. 5.22). The claim that ΔS is therefore governed exclusively by the gravitational piece should be qualified: any residual relative-entropy contribution away from τ = β/8 would deform the inverse mini-Page curve and potentially shift its minimum. A short estimate of the size of non-free-field corrections, or a clear statement of the free-field restriction, is needed for the interpretation to be load-bearing.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 14 caption and surrounding text refer to an “inverse” mini-Page curve; a brief sentence clarifying why the sign is opposite to the black-hole case (negative specific heat of the dS region) would help readers unfamiliar with the thermodynamics of the centaur geometry.
  2. The notation for the relative modular Hamiltonian switches between h_Ψ|Φ and log Δ_Ψ|Φ without a uniform convention; a single consistent choice throughout §§5–6 would improve readability.
  3. Appendix A derives the JT two-point function for comparison, yet the main text never quotes the corresponding JT mini-Page curve; a one-sentence contrast would make the role of the dS interior more transparent.
  4. Several self-citations to the authors’ earlier centaur-algebra and flow-geometry papers are essential background; ensuring that the present manuscript is self-contained for the key definitions (especially the centaur algebra of §3.1) would reduce dependence on those works.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The claimed mini-Page minimum at τ≈β/8 is the free-field Wick channel-crossing point forced by construction of y=min(2τ,˜τ-τ) under modular conjugation; the inverse shape itself is independently computed from the centaur propagator.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (5.7)–(5.9) and surrounding text; also abstract and Sec. 5.1]
    "where the coordinate y = min(2τ, ˜τ - τ) selects the dominant Wick pairing. ... At the transition point (τ = β/8) the function 1 - (πy/β) coth(πy/β) attains its extremum; this marks the precise moment of maximum information transfer. ... We find that this difference traces a characteristic mini-Page curve ... reaches a minimum near τ ≈ β/8 ... We interpret the location of the minimum as the time at which quantum information begins to escape"

    By definition of the modular conjugate, ˜τ = β/2 - τ, so the two free-field separations are 2τ and β/2 - 2τ. Their equality (the switch of the min that defines the dominant Wick channel) is elementary arithmetic: 2τ = β/2 - 2τ ⇒ τ = β/8. Any function of y that is monotonic on (0, β/2) therefore extremizes exactly at this kinematic point. The paper’s “finding” of the mini-Page minimum and its interpretation as the information-escape timescale are therefore identical to the definitional channel-crossing time of the free-field four-point function, not an independent dynamical scale extracted from the geometry or the algebra.

full rationale

The core algebraic construction (centaur algebra promoted by crossed product, Hawking-pair probe via modular conjugation, ΔS=ΔS_grav-ΔS_rel) is self-contained and draws on standard Tomita–Takesaki and crossed-product machinery (Witten et al.). The Euclidean two-point function G_β is derived from first-principles geodesic analysis in the centaur metric (Sec. 4), and the explicit form of ΔS_grav follows by replica differentiation of free-field Wick contractions of that G_β. These steps do not reduce to fitted parameters or self-citation uniqueness theorems. However, once free-field Wick theorem is assumed, the dominant channel is defined by y=min(2τ,˜τ-τ) with ˜τ=β/2-τ by modular conjugation; any monotonic function of y therefore extremizes exactly where the two separations are equal, i.e., at τ=β/8 by elementary arithmetic. The paper presents this location as a computed “finding” that “marks the precise microscopic timescale,” which is therefore partially circular. Self-citations to the authors’ prior centaur-algebra and flow-geometry papers supply only the background geometry and algebra, not the location of the minimum. The Lyapunov exponent λ=2π/β recovered from relative modular flow is the universal modular/Rindler value and is not a new derivation. Overall the central entropy curve has independent content; only the specific numerical claim τ≈β/8 is forced by the free-field channel definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard modular theory and the crossed-product construction (imported from the literature), the domain assumption that free-field Wick contractions plus the large-mass geodesic approximation capture the probe entropy, and the geometric definition of the sharp centaur background. No free parameters are fitted to data; the only ad-hoc element is the interpretive identification of the algebraic minimum with "information escape." Invented entities are limited to the probe state itself, which is a standard modular construction rather than a new physical object.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Tomita–Takesaki modular theory and the Connes cocycle identity hold for the Type III1 centaur algebra and its crossed-product Type II∞ extension.
    Used throughout Secs. 2.2, 3 and 5 to define mirror operators, relative modular Hamiltonians and the entropy difference.
  • domain assumption The sharp centaur metric (2.8) with dilaton potential V(Φ)=2|Φ|/ℓ^{2} is an exact solution of the 2D dilaton-gravity equations and provides a valid holographic background.
    Taken from Anninos et al.; all geodesics and correlators are computed on this fixed background (Sec. 2.1).
  • domain assumption In the large-mass limit the Euclidean two-point function is given by the shortest geodesic that remains entirely in the AdS region; dS-entering trajectories are sub-dominant.
    Derived in Sec. 4 by explicit comparison of on-shell actions; used as input for all Wick contractions in Sec. 5.
  • domain assumption Free-field Wick contractions of the thermal two-point function G_β fully determine the four-point normalization and the replica matrix elements that enter ΔS.
    Stated in Sec. 5.1–5.3; higher-point interactions or back-reaction beyond the probe approximation are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The location of the minimum of ΔS at τ≈β/8 can be interpreted as the microscopic time at which quantum information begins to escape the cosmological horizon.
    This is an interpretive step (abstract and Sec. 5) that goes beyond the algebraic computation of the curve itself.
invented entities (1)
  • Hawking-pair probe state |Φ angle = N^{-1/2} φ_τ φ-bar_τ |Ψ angle constructed from a local operator and its modular conjugate no independent evidence
    purpose: To isolate the information content carried by a single entangled pair across the cosmological horizon.
    Standard modular-conjugate construction (following Verlinde); not a new particle or force, but a new probe tailored to the centaur geometry.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 34421 in / 3700 out tokens · 31317 ms · 2026-07-10T05:01:03.057164+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The black hole information paradox has motivated extensive study of how and when information escapes from evaporating black holes. Here we address the analogous question for cosmological horizons: when does an individual Hawking pair begin to carry information out of a de Sitter horizon? We study this problem in a class of two-dimensional flow geometries that interpolate smoothly between an asymptotic AdS$ _2 $ boundary and a dS$ _2 $ static patch. Modeling the emission of a Hawking pair via a probe state constructed from local operators and their modular conjugates, we promote the centaur algebra of observables to a Type II$ _\infty $ factor through the crossed-product construction. This allows us to compute the entropy difference between the thermofield-double reference state and the Hawking-pair state. We find that this difference traces a characteristic mini-Page curve for the cosmological horizon: it starts near zero, reaches a minimum near $ \tau \approx \beta/8 $ before increasing again. We interpret the location of the minimum as the time at which quantum information begins to escape the cosmological horizon. Extending the analysis to the microcanonical ensemble, we show that the algebraic entropy coincides with the generalized entropy of an entanglement wedge cut that tracks the emitted particle along the horizon. Furthermore, the relative modular flow generated between the two states yields a Lyapunov exponent $\lambda =2\pi/\beta$, identifying the scrambling time as the scale at which the information carried by the pair becomes accessible to a static-patch observer.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,Phys. Rev. D 14(1976) 2460–2473

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737–740

    work page 1972

  4. [4]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

    work page 1973

  5. [5]

    D. N. Page,Average entropy of a subsystem,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 1291–1294, [gr-qc/9305007]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    D. N. Page,Black hole information, in5th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics (5CCGRRA), 5, 1993.hep-th/9305040

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    D. N. Page,Information in black hole radiation,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3743–3746, [hep-th/9306083]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  8. [8]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox

    G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox, JHEP09(2020) 002, [arXiv:1905.08255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063, [arXiv:1905.08762]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149, [arXiv:1908.10996]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Islands outside the horizon

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. Maldacena,Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  12. [12]

    Islands in cosmology

    T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, and E. Shaghoulian,Islands in cosmology,JHEP11(2020) 111, [arXiv:2008.01022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Islands in FRW Cosmologies

    R. Esp´ ındola, B. Najian, and D. Nikolakopoulou,Islands in FRW Cosmologies, arXiv:2203.04433

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Islands in Closed and Open Universes

    R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain,Islands in closed and open universes,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 8 086012, [arXiv:2202.05278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Islands Far Outside the Horizon

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Islands far outside the horizon,JHEP11(2024) 164, [arXiv:2312.03078]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    An apologia for islands

    S. Antonini, C.-H. Chen, H. Maxfield, and G. Penington,An apologia for islands, JHEP10(2025) 034, [arXiv:2506.04311]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini,Replica – 48 – Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013, [arXiv:1911.12333]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205, [arXiv:1911.11977]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington, and L. Susskind,The Python’s Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation,JHEP08(2020) 121, [arXiv:1912.00228]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow

    Y. Chen,Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow,JHEP03(2020) 033, [arXiv:1912.02210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Esp´ ındola, V

    R. Esp´ ındola, V. Jahnke, and K.-Y. Kim,Islands and traversable wormholes, arXiv:2510.21985

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    On the Quantum Information Content of a Hawking Pair

    H. Verlinde,On the Quantum Information Content of a Hawking Pair, arXiv:2210.08306

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751

    work page 1977

  24. [24]

    Infrared Realization of dS$_2$ in AdS$_2$

    D. Anninos and D. M. Hofman,Infrared Realization of dS 2 in AdS2,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018), no. 8 085003, [arXiv:1703.04622]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    De Sitter Horizons & Holographic Liquids

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante, and D. M. Hofman,De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids,JHEP07(2019) 038, [arXiv:1811.08153]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,Conf. Proc. C930308(1993) 284–296, [gr-qc/9310026]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  27. [27]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  28. [28]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  29. [29]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  30. [30]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, E. Bahiru, and R. Esp´ ındola,The centaur-algebra of observables,JHEP03(2024) 008, [arXiv:2307.04233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Gravity and the Crossed Product

    E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications

    M. Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1970. – 49 –

    work page 1970

  34. [34]

    Notes on Some Entanglement Properties of Quantum Field Theory

    E. Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018), no. 4 045003, [arXiv:1803.04993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    H. Liu,Lectures on entanglement, von Neumann algebras, and emergence of spacetime, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry, 10, 2025.arXiv:2510.07017

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 8 086020, [arXiv:2112.12156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit?

    E. Witten,Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?2022. arXiv:2112.11614

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Explicit large $N$ von Neumann algebras from matrix models

    E. Gesteau and L. Santilli,Explicit largeNvon Neumann algebras from matrix models, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024), no. 7 2245–2429, [arXiv:2402.10262]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023) 020, [arXiv:2306.01837]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Algebras and States in JT Gravity

    G. Penington and E. Witten,Algebras and States in JT Gravity,arXiv:2301.07257

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    A Background Independent Algebra in Quantum Gravity

    E. Witten,A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,JHEP03(2024) 077, [arXiv:2308.03663]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law

    T. Faulkner and A. J. Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law, JHEP11(2024) 099, [arXiv:2405.00847]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Large N algebras and generalized entropy

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington, and E. Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy,JHEP04(2023) 009, [arXiv:2209.10454]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082, [arXiv:2206.10780]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    A. J. Speranza,An intrinsic cosmological observer,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), no. 21 215023, [arXiv:2504.07630]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington,A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,arXiv:2406.02116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Spectral Admissibility of Real Observers in Euclidean de Sitter Gravity

    R. Esp´ ındola and A. F. Ali,Spectral Admissibility of Real Observers in Euclidean de Sitter Gravity,arXiv:2605.30423

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Chen and J

    B. Chen and J. Xu,An algebra for covariant observers in de Sitter space, arXiv:2511.00622

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Connes,Une classification des facteurs de type{iii},Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure6(1973), no

    A. Connes,Une classification des facteurs de type{iii},Annales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure6(1973), no. 2 133–252. – 50 –

    work page 1973

  50. [50]

    H. Geng, Y. Nomura, and H.-Y. Sun,Information paradox and its resolution in de Sitter holography,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 12 126004, [arXiv:2103.07477]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Flow-geometry microstates

    R. Esp´ ındola and S. Miyashita,Flow-geometry microstates,JHEP06(2026) 021, [arXiv:2510.18901]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde,Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK,JHEP02(2019) 156, [arXiv:1807.03916]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,arXiv:2509.14338

    E. Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,arXiv:2509.14338

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Kudler-Flam and E

    J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten,Emergent Mixed States for Baby Universes and Black Holes,arXiv:2510.06376

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,arXiv:2512.13807

    H. Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,arXiv:2512.13807

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    The algebraic structure of gravitational scrambling

    G. Penington and E. Tabor,The algebraic structure of gravitational scrambling, arXiv:2508.21062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Holographic Order from Modular Chaos

    J. De Boer and L. Lamprou,Holographic Order from Modular Chaos,JHEP06(2020) 024, [arXiv:1912.02810]. – 51 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020