REVIEW 6 cited by
FrontendBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Front-End Development via Automatic Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
FrontendBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Front-End Development via Automatic Evaluation
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in front-end code generation. However, existing benchmarks exhibit several critical limitations: many tasks are overly simplistic, test cases often lack rigor, and end-to-end validation is absent. These issues hinder the accurate assessment of model performance. To address these challenges, we present FrontendBench, a benchmark co-developed by humans and LLMs. FrontendBench categorizes tasks based on code functionality and incorporates interactive test scenarios, enabling a more comprehensive and practical evaluation of front-end code generation capabilities. The benchmark comprises 148 meticulously crafted prompt-test case pairs spanning five levels of web components, from basic UI elements to complex interactive features. Each task reflects realistic front-end development challenges. Furthermore, we introduce an automatic evaluation framework that executes generated code within a sandbox environment and assesses outcomes using predefined test scripts. This framework achieves a 90.54% agreement rate with expert human evaluations, demonstrating high reliability. We benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs on FrontendBench and observe substantial performance disparities in handling real-world front-end tasks. These results highlight FrontendBench as a reliable and scalable benchmark, supporting consistent multimodal evaluation and providing a robust foundation for future research in front-end code generation. Our data and code will be released soon.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Asuka-Bench: Benchmarking Code Agents on Underspecified User Intent and Multi-Round Refinement
Asuka-Bench is a new benchmark of 50 web tasks with 784 criteria that evaluates 8 LLMs in 2 frameworks on multi-round refinement, finding a 38-point spread in weighted task pass rate and a top score of only 52% after ...
-
WorldCoder-Bench: Benchmarking Physically Grounded 3D World Synthesis
Introduces WorldCoder-Bench and StateProbe for evaluating LLM-generated physically grounded 3D browser worlds, with frontier models reaching at most 27.8% verification coverage.
-
Cookie-Bench: Continuous On-screen Key Interaction Evaluation for Web Generation
Cookie-Bench is a reference-free 1,000-query web development benchmark paired with Cookie-Frame, a metacognition-inspired three-stage framework (static perception, agent interaction, dynamic scoring) that aligns with ...
-
Coding with Eyes: Visual Feedback Unlocks Reliable GUI Code Generating and Debugging
VF-Coder raises GUI code success rate from 21.68% to 28.29% and visual score from 0.4284 to 0.5584 on a new 984-task benchmark by adding direct visual perception and interaction.
-
OpenGame: Open Agentic Coding for Games
OpenGame is the first open-source agentic framework for end-to-end web game creation, using Game Skills and GameCoder-27B to achieve state-of-the-art results on 150 prompts via a new benchmark measuring build health, ...
-
LH-Bench: Skill-Grounded Evaluation of Long-Horizon Agents on Subjective Enterprise Tasks
Expert-authored dual-use skills make LLM judges more reliable on subjective long-horizon enterprise agent tasks than LLM-authored rubrics, with human preferences confirming the main ranking boundary.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.