REVIEW 23 cited by
MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents, yet existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. In this paper, we introduce MultiAgentBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. Our framework measures not only task completion but also the quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. Moreover, we evaluate various coordination protocols (including star, chain, tree, and graph topologies) and innovative strategies such as group discussion and cognitive planning. Notably, gpt-4o-mini reaches the average highest task score, graph structure performs the best among coordination protocols in the research scenario, and cognitive planning improves milestone achievement rates by 3%. Code and datasets are public available at https://github.com/MultiagentBench/MARBLE.
Forward citations
Cited by 23 Pith papers
-
AgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks
AgentSocialBench demonstrates that privacy preservation is fundamentally harder in human-centered agentic social networks than in single-agent cases due to cross-domain coordination pressures and an abstraction parado...
-
Specialize Roles, Mix Deployments: Pushing the Cost-Accuracy Frontier of LLM Agent Teams
AgentCARD benchmark shows heterogeneous LLM agent teams with mixed deployments reach the cost-accuracy frontier, delivering up to 44% higher accuracy or 12x lower cost than uniform teams, with domain-specific role bot...
-
Beyond the All-in-One Agent: Benchmarking Role-Specialized Multi-Agent Collaboration in Enterprise Workflows
EntCollabBench shows that today's LLM agents still struggle with delegation, context transfer, parameter grounding, workflow closure, and decision commitment when tested in a simulated enterprise with 11 role-speciali...
-
TraceFix: Repairing Agent Coordination Protocols with TLA+ Counterexamples
TraceFix repairs LLM-generated multi-agent protocols via TLA+ counterexamples to achieve full verification on all tested tasks and higher completion rates than prompt-only baselines.
-
TeamBench: Evaluating Agent Coordination under Enforced Role Separation
Enforcing role separation in agent teams reveals that prompt-only setups hide coordination failures, with verifiers approving 49% of failing work and teams sometimes harming performance when solo agents already succeed.
-
AI scientists produce results without reasoning scientifically
LLM agents execute scientific tasks but fail to follow core scientific reasoning norms such as evidence consideration and belief revision based on refutations.
-
SciVisAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Agents
SciVisAgentBench provides 108 expert-crafted tasks and a mixed LLM-plus-deterministic evaluation pipeline for benchmarking AI agents that perform scientific visualization workflows.
-
SciVisAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Agents
A taxonomy-grounded 108-case SciVis agent benchmark with multimodal LLM-plus-deterministic evaluation finds general-purpose coding agents currently beat most specialized SciVis agents on outcome quality.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new benchmark for self-evolving memory in LLM agents across task streams, with baseline ExpRAG and proposed ReMem method that integrates reasoning, actions, and memory updates for continual improvement.
-
$\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
τ²-bench provides a Dec-POMDP-based telecom domain with compositional task generation and a tool-constrained user simulator to measure agent performance drops in dual-control versus single-control settings.
-
Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Tool-using LLM agents can implement undetectable stegosystems, shifting the primary barrier to covert multi-agent collusion from technical feasibility to coordination without explicit agreement.
-
FASE: Fast Adaptive Semantic Entropy for Code Quality
FASE approximates functional correctness via MST on structural and semantic dissimilarity graphs, reporting 25% better Spearman correlation and 19% better ROCAUC than LLM-based semantic entropy at 0.3% runtime cost on...
-
AutoScientists: Self-Organizing Agent Teams for Long-Running Scientific Experimentation
Decentralized AI agent teams self-organize around hypotheses, critique proposals, and share knowledge to outperform single-agent baselines on biomedical ML, language-model optimization, and protein fitness tasks.
-
Choose Your Agent: Tradeoffs in Adopting AI Advisors, Coaches, and Delegates in Multi-Party Negotiation
Users prefer an AI Advisor but gain most with a Delegate, because human editing filters out the AI's best proposals.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new streaming benchmark and evaluation framework for self-evolving memory in LLM agents, unifying over ten memory modules and introducing the ReMem pipeline for continual improvement on multi-turn and ...
-
Is Inter-Seed Cross-Play Enough? Evaluating the Robustness of Zero-Shot Coordination Algorithms to Implementation Details
For Other-Play in Yokai, agents trained with different implementation details coordinate across implementations about as well as across seeds, supporting inter-seed cross-play as a proxy for cross-implementation evaluation.
-
The Cost of Knowing: A Resource-Aware Protocol for Benchmarking Hallucination Beyond Static Leaderboards
MAS-HQ defines a resource-aware Q-Score and shows that the system with the highest raw factuality is often not the winner once normalized cost is subtracted.
-
AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
AgentCompass is a modular evaluation infrastructure that decouples benchmark, harness, and environment for LLM agents, and its experiments show model scores vary substantially with the harness used.
-
MAS-Lab: A Specification-Driven Validation Framework for Reliable Multi-Agent Systems
MAS-Lab proposes a specification-driven framework with Spec, MAS-OS, and Labs layers to enable intent-based validation and reliable evolution of multi-agent systems.
-
OpenHospital: A Thing-in-itself Arena for Evolving and Benchmarking LLM-based Collective Intelligence
OpenHospital is an interactive physician-patient multi-agent arena that improves clinical metrics via ground-truth reflection and reports cooperative behaviors as evidence of evolving LLM collective intelligence.
-
Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models
The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applicat...
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
-
From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review
A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.