Quantum Matter Makes Lightcones Quantum

Misao Sasaki; Tomohiro Fujita

arxiv: 2606.03671 · v1 · pith:YCYJJBDVnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· quant-ph

Quantum Matter Makes Lightcones Quantum

Tomohiro Fujita , Misao Sasaki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph

keywords quantum gravitylight conesShapiro delaycausal structurequantum matterWightman functionUV cutoff

0 comments

The pith

Quantum matter sources an operator-valued Shapiro delay that renders causal boundaries noncommuting observables.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks what occurs when the matter that sets light cones exists in a quantum state instead of a definite classical configuration. It considers a massless scalar field on the Newtonian gravitational potential produced by a non-relativistic quantum particle treated as a fixed background. The central result is that the gravitational time delay itself becomes an operator, so that shifts in the causal boundary are noncommuting observables. A reader cares because this supplies a concrete mechanism by which quantum matter can make the causal structure of spacetime itself quantum, without invoking quantized gravitons.

Core claim

In the spacetime whose geometry is the Newtonian potential sourced by a non-relativistic quantum particle, a propagating massless scalar field experiences an operator-valued Shapiro delay. Consequently, causal-boundary shifts become noncommuting observables that endow the causal structure with irreducible quantum uncertainty; the causal relation between any two fixed events can exist in a superposition of timelike and spacelike configurations; and tracing over the source state smears the light-cone singularity of the Wightman function, yielding an effective ultraviolet cutoff.

What carries the argument

The operator-valued Shapiro delay, which promotes the classical gravitational time delay into an operator acting on the quantum state of the source.

If this is right

Causal-boundary shifts are promoted to noncommuting observables, giving causal structure an irreducible quantum uncertainty.
The causal relation between two fixed spacetime points can become a superposition of timelike and spacelike configurations.
Tracing out the source state smears the Wightman light-cone singularity and produces an effective UV cutoff.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same operator delay could be used to examine how quantum sources affect null geodesics in weak-field regimes beyond the Newtonian limit.
The superposition of causal relations offers a setting in which to ask whether quantum information can be sent across classically spacelike intervals.
The effective cutoff suggests a possible matter-induced regularization mechanism that might be compared with other ultraviolet regularizations in quantum field theory on curved backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The spacetime geometry is fixed by the Newtonian gravitational potential of a non-relativistic quantum particle, with the massless scalar field propagating on that background without back-reaction.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the smeared Wightman function that nevertheless retains a sharp light-cone singularity after the source is traced out would falsify the claimed ultraviolet cutoff.

read the original abstract

In gravitational physics, matter does not merely move within spacetime; it also determines the light cones that define causal relations. What happens when the matter that determines these light cones is itself in a quantum state? We address this question in a controlled low-energy setting: a massless scalar field propagating in the spacetime with the Newtonian gravitational potential sourced by a non-relativistic quantum particle. We show that the light cones are affected by an operator-valued Shapiro delay, with the three consequences: (i) causal-boundary shifts are promoted to noncommuting observables, giving the causal structure an irreducible quantum uncertainty; (ii) the causal relation between two fixed spacetime points can become a superposition of timelike and spacelike configurations; and (iii) tracing out the source smears the Wightman light-cone singularity, producing an effective UV cutoff. Thus, quantum matter does not merely fluctuate within spacetime; it makes the causal structure itself quantum, even without quantized gravitons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Quantum matter inducing operator-valued light cones is a neat idea in a Newtonian setup, but the paper needs to justify how standard QFT works when the metric itself is an operator.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the authors take a non-relativistic quantum particle as source for Newtonian gravity, then propagate a massless scalar on that background and claim the Shapiro time delay becomes operator-valued. This leads to noncommuting causal boundaries, superpositions of causal relations, and a smeared Wightman function.

What they do well is pick a simple, controlled model that avoids full quantum gravity while still letting quantum matter affect the causal structure. The three consequences follow logically from treating the delay as an operator once you accept the setup.

The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags: standard QFT on curved spacetime assumes a classical metric. Replacing the metric with an operator and just inserting an operator delay into the propagation doesn't automatically give you a consistent field algebra or preserve the Hadamard condition. The paper would need to show how the mode expansion or the two-point function is defined when the background is quantum. Without that, the claims about smeared singularities and causal superpositions rest on an assumption that may not hold.

This is the kind of paper that belongs in a reading group for people working on semiclassical gravity or quantum foundations. It raises a legitimate question about whether causal structure can inherit quantum features from matter at low energies. The math looks formal but the physical justification for the operator replacement is the part that needs referee scrutiny.

I would send it to peer review. The model is clean enough that referees can check whether the derivation actually works or where it breaks.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines a massless scalar field propagating on a background spacetime whose Newtonian gravitational potential is sourced by a non-relativistic quantum particle. It derives an operator-valued Shapiro delay that modifies the light cones and yields three consequences: (i) causal boundaries become noncommuting observables, imparting irreducible quantum uncertainty to the causal structure; (ii) the causal character between two fixed points can exist in superposition of timelike and spacelike relations; and (iii) tracing out the source smears the Wightman light-cone singularity, inducing an effective UV cutoff. The central claim is that quantum matter renders the causal structure itself quantum, without requiring quantized gravitons.

Significance. If the formalism is rigorously justified, the result would be significant for low-energy quantum gravity phenomenology: it supplies a controlled model in which causal relations acquire quantum features directly from quantum matter, distinct from graviton fluctuations. The three listed consequences are falsifiable in principle and could motivate new thought experiments or effective-field-theory tests. The work is strengthened by its restriction to a Newtonian, non-relativistic source, which keeps the setup within a well-defined regime.

major comments (2)

[Setup] Setup paragraph (first sentence of the model description): the replacement of the Newtonian potential by an operator-valued quantity sourced by a quantum particle position turns the metric components into operators. Standard QFT on curved spacetime defines the d'Alembertian, null geodesics, and the Hadamard form with a c-number metric; the manuscript must derive the resulting field algebra and show whether the usual singularity structure survives the operator substitution. Without this step, consequences (ii) and (iii) rest on an unverified extrapolation.
[Consequence (ii)] Consequence (ii), paragraph discussing superposition of causal relations: the claim that the causal character between two fixed coordinate points becomes a quantum superposition requires an explicit construction of the joint state of the field and source that realizes a coherent superposition of timelike and spacelike configurations, rather than a classical mixture. The operator delay alone does not automatically guarantee coherence unless the propagation kernel is shown to act as a superposition operator on the two-point function.

minor comments (2)

[Derivation of operator delay] Clarify the precise operator ordering and commutation relations used when inserting the Shapiro delay into the retarded propagator.
[Consequence (iii)] Add a short paragraph comparing the obtained effective UV cutoff scale with existing literature on quantum-gravity-induced cutoffs (e.g., via Planck-scale fluctuations).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments correctly identify points where the manuscript's heuristic treatment requires additional justification and explicit constructions. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested derivations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Setup] Setup paragraph (first sentence of the model description): the replacement of the Newtonian potential by an operator-valued quantity sourced by a quantum particle position turns the metric components into operators. Standard QFT on curved spacetime defines the d'Alembertian, null geodesics, and the Hadamard form with a c-number metric; the manuscript must derive the resulting field algebra and show whether the usual singularity structure survives the operator substitution. Without this step, consequences (ii) and (iii) rest on an unverified extrapolation.

Authors: We agree that the substitution of an operator-valued metric requires explicit justification within the field algebra. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the first-order perturbative correction to the d'Alembertian and the associated modification of the Hadamard two-point function when the metric perturbation is promoted to an operator. This calculation shows that the light-cone singularity structure is preserved at the operator level and only becomes smeared after tracing over the source, thereby grounding consequences (ii) and (iii) in a controlled expansion rather than an extrapolation. revision: yes
Referee: [Consequence (ii)] Consequence (ii), paragraph discussing superposition of causal relations: the claim that the causal character between two fixed coordinate points becomes a quantum superposition requires an explicit construction of the joint state of the field and source that realizes a coherent superposition of timelike and spacelike configurations, rather than a classical mixture. The operator delay alone does not automatically guarantee coherence unless the propagation kernel is shown to act as a superposition operator on the two-point function.

Authors: We will supply the requested explicit construction. In the revised manuscript we introduce the joint initial state in which the source particle is prepared in a coherent spatial superposition and the field is in its vacuum. The resulting two-point function is then computed as the expectation value of the operator-valued retarded propagator; the off-diagonal matrix elements between different source positions produce interference terms that cannot be reproduced by a classical mixture. This demonstrates that the propagation kernel acts as a superposition operator on the two-point function, realizing a coherent superposition of causal relations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained in stated model

full rationale

The paper's central claims are presented as direct consequences of propagating a massless scalar on a fixed Newtonian background whose potential is sourced by a non-relativistic quantum particle. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness statements in the abstract reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-citations, or ansatze imported from the authors' prior work. The three listed consequences follow from the operator-valued Shapiro delay within the given setup, without the derivation chain collapsing to a renaming or self-referential definition. This is the normal case of a self-contained theoretical calculation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a semiclassical Newtonian background sourced by quantum matter; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are extractable from the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Spacetime geometry is given by the Newtonian gravitational potential sourced by a non-relativistic quantum particle.
Explicitly stated as the controlled low-energy setting in the abstract.
domain assumption A massless scalar field propagates on this fixed background without back-reaction.
Implied by the propagation statement in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 1283 out tokens · 21951 ms · 2026-06-28T08:59:13.595053+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 12 internal anchors

[1]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Cambridge University Press, 1982, ISBN 978-0-511-62263-2, 978-0-521-27858-4 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511622632

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1982
[2]

R. M. Wald, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-87027-4
[3]

L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Cambridge University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0-521-87787-9, 978-0-521-87787-9, 978-0-511-60155-2 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813924

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813924 2009
[4]

Sasaki, Prog

M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys.76(1986), 1036 doi:10.1143/PTP.76.1036

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.76.1036 1986
[5]

V. F. Mukhanov, Sov. Phys. JETP67(1988), 1297-1302

1988
[6]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akramiet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A10 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 [arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2020
[7]

A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.30(1979), 682-685

1979
[8]

D. N. Page and C. D. Geilker, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 979-982 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.979

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.979 1981
[9]

Gravitation and quantummechanical localization of macroobjects

L. Di´ osi, Phys. Lett. A105(1984), 199-202 doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90397-9 [arXiv:1412.0201 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90397-9 1984
[10]

Penrose, Gen

R. Penrose, Gen. Rel. Grav.28(1996), 581-600 doi:10.1007/BF02105068

work page doi:10.1007/bf02105068 1996
[11]

B. L. Hu and E. Verdaguer, Living Rev. Rel.11(2008), 3 doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-3 [arXiv:0802.0658 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-3 2008
[12]

The Schr\"odinger-Newton equation and its foundations

M. Bahrami, A. Großardt, S. Donadi and A. Bassi, New J. Phys.16(2014) no.11, 115007 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/115007 [arXiv:1407.4370 [quant-ph]]. – 18 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/115007 2014
[13]

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P. Barker, M. S. Kim and G. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.24, 240401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240401 [arXiv:1707.06050 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240401 2017
[14]

Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity

C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.24, 240402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240402 [arXiv:1707.06036 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240402 2017
[15]

Fujita, Y

T. Fujita, Y. Kaku, A. Matsumura and Y. Michimura, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no.16, 165003 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf0bb [arXiv:2308.14552 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf0bb 2025
[16]

I. I. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 789-791 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.789 1964
[17]

C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17(2014), 4 doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 [arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014
[18]

The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields

S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Commun. Math. Phys.172(1995), 187-220 doi:10.1007/BF02104515 [arXiv:hep-th/0303037 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf02104515 1995
[19]

Doplicher, K

S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B331(1994), 39-44 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7 1994
[20]

Quantum correlations with no causal order

O. Oreshkov, F. Costa and C. Brukner, Nature Commun.3(2012), 1092 doi:10.1038/ncomms2076 [arXiv:1105.4464 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/ncomms2076 2012
[21]

M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski and ˇC. Brukner, Nature Commun.10(2019) no.1, 3772 doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x [arXiv:1708.00248 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x 2019
[22]

L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D51(1995), 1692-1700 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1692 [arXiv:gr-qc/9410047 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.1692 1995
[23]

L. H. Ford and N. F. Svaiter, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 2640-2646 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2640 [arXiv:gr-qc/9604052 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2640 1996
[24]

Matsui, [arXiv:2605.05916 [hep-th]]

H. Matsui, [arXiv:2605.05916 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

Pedalino, B

S. Pedalino, B. E. Ram´ ırez-Galindo, R. Ferstl, K. Hornberger, M. Arndt and S. Gerlich, [arXiv:2507.21211 [quant-ph]]

arXiv
[26]

M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P. Martin, A. Bruno and Y. Chu, Science380 (2023) no.6642, adf7553 doi:10.1126/science.adf7553 [arXiv:2211.00449 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1126/science.adf7553 2023
[27]

P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, D. N. Page, M. Sasaki and D. h. Yeom, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.16, 161304 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161304 [arXiv:1511.05695 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.161304 2016
[28]

P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, D. N. Page, M. Sasaki and D. H. Yeom, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, no.13, 1645003 (2016) doi:10.1142/S0218271816450036 – 19 –

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271816450036 2016

[1] [1]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Cambridge University Press, 1982, ISBN 978-0-511-62263-2, 978-0-521-27858-4 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511622632

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1982

[2] [2]

R. M. Wald, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-87027-4

[3] [3]

L. E. Parker and D. Toms, Cambridge University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0-521-87787-9, 978-0-521-87787-9, 978-0-511-60155-2 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813924

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813924 2009

[4] [4]

Sasaki, Prog

M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys.76(1986), 1036 doi:10.1143/PTP.76.1036

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.76.1036 1986

[5] [5]

V. F. Mukhanov, Sov. Phys. JETP67(1988), 1297-1302

1988

[6] [6]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

Y. Akramiet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A10 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 [arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 2020

[7] [7]

A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett.30(1979), 682-685

1979

[8] [8]

D. N. Page and C. D. Geilker, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 979-982 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.979

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.47.979 1981

[9] [9]

Gravitation and quantummechanical localization of macroobjects

L. Di´ osi, Phys. Lett. A105(1984), 199-202 doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90397-9 [arXiv:1412.0201 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0375-9601(84)90397-9 1984

[10] [10]

Penrose, Gen

R. Penrose, Gen. Rel. Grav.28(1996), 581-600 doi:10.1007/BF02105068

work page doi:10.1007/bf02105068 1996

[11] [11]

B. L. Hu and E. Verdaguer, Living Rev. Rel.11(2008), 3 doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-3 [arXiv:0802.0658 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-3 2008

[12] [12]

The Schr\"odinger-Newton equation and its foundations

M. Bahrami, A. Großardt, S. Donadi and A. Bassi, New J. Phys.16(2014) no.11, 115007 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/115007 [arXiv:1407.4370 [quant-ph]]. – 18 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/115007 2014

[13] [13]

S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. Geraci, P. Barker, M. S. Kim and G. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.24, 240401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240401 [arXiv:1707.06050 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240401 2017

[14] [14]

Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity

C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) no.24, 240402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240402 [arXiv:1707.06036 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240402 2017

[15] [15]

Fujita, Y

T. Fujita, Y. Kaku, A. Matsumura and Y. Michimura, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) no.16, 165003 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf0bb [arXiv:2308.14552 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf0bb 2025

[16] [16]

I. I. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 789-791 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.789

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.789 1964

[17] [17]

C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17(2014), 4 doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 [arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014

[18] [18]

The quantum structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields

S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Commun. Math. Phys.172(1995), 187-220 doi:10.1007/BF02104515 [arXiv:hep-th/0303037 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf02104515 1995

[19] [19]

Doplicher, K

S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B331(1994), 39-44 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7 1994

[20] [20]

Quantum correlations with no causal order

O. Oreshkov, F. Costa and C. Brukner, Nature Commun.3(2012), 1092 doi:10.1038/ncomms2076 [arXiv:1105.4464 [quant-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/ncomms2076 2012

[21] [21]

M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski and ˇC. Brukner, Nature Commun.10(2019) no.1, 3772 doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x [arXiv:1708.00248 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11579-x 2019

[22] [22]

L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D51(1995), 1692-1700 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1692 [arXiv:gr-qc/9410047 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.1692 1995

[23] [23]

L. H. Ford and N. F. Svaiter, Phys. Rev. D54(1996), 2640-2646 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2640 [arXiv:gr-qc/9604052 [gr-qc]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.2640 1996

[24] [24]

Matsui, [arXiv:2605.05916 [hep-th]]

H. Matsui, [arXiv:2605.05916 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[25] [25]

Pedalino, B

S. Pedalino, B. E. Ram´ ırez-Galindo, R. Ferstl, K. Hornberger, M. Arndt and S. Gerlich, [arXiv:2507.21211 [quant-ph]]

arXiv

[26] [26]

M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P. Martin, A. Bruno and Y. Chu, Science380 (2023) no.6642, adf7553 doi:10.1126/science.adf7553 [arXiv:2211.00449 [quant-ph]]

work page doi:10.1126/science.adf7553 2023

[27] [27]

P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, D. N. Page, M. Sasaki and D. h. Yeom, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.16, 161304 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161304 [arXiv:1511.05695 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.161304 2016

[28] [28]

P. Chen, Y. C. Ong, D. N. Page, M. Sasaki and D. H. Yeom, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, no.13, 1645003 (2016) doi:10.1142/S0218271816450036 – 19 –

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271816450036 2016