arxiv: 2604.06053 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

Pablo F. Muguruza (1 , 2 , 3) , Carlos F. Sopuerta (1 , 2) ((1) Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC) , (2) Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC) , (3) Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB))

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords extreme-mass-ratio inspiralsLISAKerr metricsymmetry breakingmultipole momentsgravitational wavestests of general relativityblack hole structure

0 comments

The pith

LISA can constrain equatorial symmetry breaking of the Kerr metric to 10^{-2} and axial breaking to 10^{-3} using extreme-mass-ratio inspirals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores how extreme-mass-ratio inspirals observed by LISA can serve as precise probes of the spacetime geometry around supermassive black holes. The authors extend an Analytic Kludge waveform model to include modifications to the mass quadrupole and octupole moments that break the equatorial and axial symmetries of the Kerr solution. They perform a Fisher-matrix analysis to forecast the measurement precision achievable with LISA data. A sympathetic reader cares because these long inspiral signals accumulate many gravitational-wave cycles in the strong-field regime, offering sensitivity to horizon-scale structure that could distinguish general relativity from alternative theories. The central result is that one year of data from a 10 solar-mass object into a 10^6 solar-mass rotating black hole at signal-to-noise ratio 30 suffices for the quoted bounds.

Core claim

At leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio orders, the Analytic Kludge EMRI waveform is augmented with axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric quadrupole and octupole moments that parameterize breaking of equatorial and axial symmetries in the Kerr metric. Fisher-matrix analysis of LISA observations then shows that one year of data from a 10 M⊙ compact object inspiraling into a 10^6 M⊙ rotating supermassive black hole at SNR 30 constrains equatorial symmetry breaking at the 10^{-2} level and axial symmetry breaking at the 10^{-3} level, providing tests of black hole structure and models such as the fuzzball.

What carries the argument

The Analytic Kludge waveform model extended to incorporate non-Kerr axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric quadrupole and octupole moments that parameterize equatorial and axial symmetry breaking.

If this is right

LISA will deliver powerful tests of black hole structure and the underlying theory of gravity via EMRI signals.
Horizon-scale modifications predicted by certain models beyond general relativity, such as the fuzzball, become testable.
Deviations from the two fundamental symmetries of the Kerr metric can be bounded at high precision with one year of data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The differing precision between equatorial and axial constraints suggests EMRIs are more sensitive to certain symmetry-breaking patterns than others.
These forecasts could be combined with electromagnetic observations of black hole shadows to cross-check spacetime geometry at multiple scales.
If no deviations are detected, the results would tighten the case that supermassive black holes obey the exact Kerr symmetries in the strong-field regime.

Load-bearing premise

The Analytic Kludge waveform model at leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio orders remains accurate when the central object has modified, symmetry-breaking multipole moments in the strong-field regime.

What would settle it

A full numerical or higher-order waveform simulation of an EMRI around a non-Kerr object with known symmetry-breaking moments that yields parameter-estimation errors inconsistent with the reported Fisher-matrix bounds at the 10^{-2} to 10^{-3} level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06053 by 2, 2) ((1) Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), (2) Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC), 3), (3) Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)), Carlos F. Sopuerta (1, Pablo F. Muguruza (1.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Measurement accuracy of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals (EMRIs) are one of the main sources of gravitational waves expected in the low-frequency band, where space-based detectors like Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will operate. The large number of gravitational-wave cycles accumulated in the EMRI signal in the strong-field regime makes them precise probes of the local spacetime geometry, highly sensitive to deviations from the Kerr black hole paradigm. In this work, we investigate EMRIs around generic, non-Kerr compact objects characterized by a rich multipolar structure. At leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio orders, we incorporate in the waveform model both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric components of the mass quadrupole and octupole moments, parameterizing the breaking of two fundamental symmetries of the Kerr metric. We study the impact of these modifications on the waveform following the philosophy of EMRI \emph{Analytic Kludge} models. Then, using Fisher-matrix analysis, we assess LISA's capability to constrain deviations of the multipole moments from their Kerr values and the detection of symmetry-breaking effects. We analyze how effectively LISA will probe models beyond General Relativity that predict horizon-scale modifications, such as the fuzzball model proposed in string theory. Our results demonstrate that future LISA observations of EMRIs will provide powerful tests of black hole structure and the underlying theory of gravity. In particular, with one year of LISA data from the inspiral of a $10 M_{\odot}$ compact object into a rotating supermassive black hole of $10^{6} M_{\odot}$ and signal-to-noise ratio of 30, it will be possible to place tight bounds on deviations from the two fundamental symmetries of the Kerr metric, constraining equatorial symmetry breaking to the $10^{-2}$ level and axial symmetry breaking to the $10^{-3}$ level.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Extends Analytic Kludge to axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric quadrupole/octupole deviations for Kerr symmetry breaking, then runs Fisher forecasts for LISA, but the waveform accuracy for those deviations is untested.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper adds parameters for breaking equatorial and axial symmetry through the mass quadrupole and octupole moments inside the Analytic Kludge framework and then uses Fisher matrices to forecast what LISA could measure on a typical EMRI. They get bounds around 10^{-2} for equatorial breaking and 10^{-3} for axial breaking with one year of data at SNR 30. That is the concrete new piece: the joint treatment of axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric pieces at leading PN and linear mass ratio, tied to ideas like fuzzballs. The calculation itself is straightforward and gives readable numbers for how LISA might probe horizon-scale modifications. The soft spot is exactly what the stress test flags. The kludge was built for Kerr or small deviations, and once the multipoles are allowed to shift at the levels being constrained, the geodesic frequencies, radiation reaction, and accumulated phase over 10^5 cycles can pick up uncontrolled errors from missing higher-order terms or self-force effects. The paper does not show any cross-check against a more faithful model or an error budget for this extension, so the quoted sensitivities rest on an assumption that has not been verified. This is the kind of work that belongs in the EMRI modeling and LISA test-of-GR community. It is clear enough and the parameterization is new, so it deserves a serious referee who can ask for the missing validation runs. I would send it to review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses an Analytic Kludge waveform model at leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio order to incorporate axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric quadrupole and octupole moments that break equatorial and axial symmetries of the Kerr metric. Fisher-matrix forecasts are presented for LISA observations of EMRIs, claiming that one year of data from a 10 M⊙ compact object inspiraling into a 10^6 M⊙ rotating supermassive black hole at SNR=30 can constrain equatorial symmetry breaking to the 10^{-2} level and axial symmetry breaking to the 10^{-3} level, thereby testing horizon-scale modifications such as those in fuzzball models.

Significance. If the waveform model accurately reproduces the accumulated gravitational-wave phase for these modified multipoles, the forecasts would establish EMRIs as sensitive probes of black-hole no-hair violations and alternative gravity theories at strong-field scales, leveraging the large number of cycles accumulated in the LISA band.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claims (equatorial breaking to 10^{-2}, axial to 10^{-3}) rest on the untested assumption that the Analytic Kludge at leading PN and linear mass-ratio order remains accurate when the central object has modified, symmetry-breaking quadrupole and octupole moments. No convergence tests, comparison to numerical waveforms, or error budget for strong-field geodesic frequencies and radiation reaction are provided, yet the Fisher-matrix bounds depend on phase accuracy over ~10^5 cycles.
[Waveform modeling and Fisher analysis sections] Waveform modeling and Fisher analysis sections: The parameterization of symmetry-breaking amplitudes is introduced without demonstrating that the mapping from modified multipoles to the metric, geodesic motion, and waveform generation remains consistent and free of uncontrolled higher-order or self-force errors at the deviation levels being constrained.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from explicit statements of the exact functional form used for the non-axisymmetric multipole components and how they reduce to the Kerr case.
Notation for the symmetry-breaking parameters should be defined once and used consistently to avoid potential confusion with standard mass and current multipole moments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the scope and limitations of the Analytic Kludge framework used in our forecasts. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to strengthen the discussion of approximations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central quantitative claims (equatorial breaking to 10^{-2}, axial to 10^{-3}) rest on the untested assumption that the Analytic Kludge at leading PN and linear mass-ratio order remains accurate when the central object has modified, symmetry-breaking quadrupole and octupole moments. No convergence tests, comparison to numerical waveforms, or error budget for strong-field geodesic frequencies and radiation reaction are provided, yet the Fisher-matrix bounds depend on phase accuracy over ~10^5 cycles.

Authors: We acknowledge that the Analytic Kludge (AK) is an approximate model and that direct numerical validation for these specific symmetry-breaking modifications is not yet available in the literature. The AK framework is the established approach for exploratory EMRI Fisher analyses, as it incorporates leading-order effects on geodesics and radiation reaction while remaining computationally tractable. Our quantitative claims are presented as indicative bounds within this standard approximation. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that (i) recalls the known phase accuracy of AK for Kerr EMRIs, (ii) estimates that deviations at the 10^{-2}–10^{-3} level remain within the regime where higher-order corrections are suppressed, and (iii) explicitly states that future self-force or numerical-relativity calculations will be required for tighter error budgets. revision: partial
Referee: [Waveform modeling and Fisher analysis sections] Waveform modeling and Fisher analysis sections: The parameterization of symmetry-breaking amplitudes is introduced without demonstrating that the mapping from modified multipoles to the metric, geodesic motion, and waveform generation remains consistent and free of uncontrolled higher-order or self-force errors at the deviation levels being constrained.

Authors: The parameterization is constructed by augmenting the standard multipole moments in the AK geodesic and flux expressions at leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio order, following the same logic used in prior AK studies of deformed metrics. This ensures consistency within the adopted approximation scheme. We have expanded the waveform modeling section to explicitly derive the mapping from modified quadrupole/octupole amplitudes to orbital frequencies and energy loss, and to argue that, for small deviations, any uncontrolled higher-order or self-force contributions enter at O(ε²) or higher, where ε denotes the deviation parameter. We agree that a complete self-force analysis would be desirable but lies beyond current capabilities for these spacetimes. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct numerical-relativity or self-force waveforms for spacetimes with arbitrary symmetry-breaking multipoles
Quantitative convergence tests of the AK phase over 10^5 cycles for the specific modified metrics considered

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Fisher forecasts from parameterized Analytic Kludge are forward predictions, not self-referential

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by extending the standard Analytic Kludge waveform (leading PN, linear mass ratio) with explicit quadrupole/octupole deviation parameters that break equatorial and axial symmetries, then computing the Fisher information matrix for a fiducial LISA EMRI signal (10 M⊙ into 10^6 M⊙, SNR=30, 1 yr). The resulting 10^{-2} and 10^{-3} bounds are statistical forecasts of measurement precision under the assumed model and noise; they are not obtained by fitting the target deviation parameters to data and re-deriving them, nor do any equations reduce the output bounds to the input multipole values by construction. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that closes the loop, and the central claim remains an external statistical projection rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Analytic Kludge approximation for modified multipoles and on the linear mass-ratio, leading-PN expansion; the deviation amplitudes themselves are free parameters to be constrained rather than derived.

free parameters (1)

equatorial and axial symmetry-breaking amplitudes for quadrupole and octupole moments
These are the parameters whose deviations from Kerr values are forecasted; they are introduced to quantify symmetry breaking and are not fixed by any derivation in the abstract.

axioms (2)

ad hoc to paper Analytic Kludge waveform model remains valid for non-Kerr multipolar structure
Invoked to generate the waveform at leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio orders.
domain assumption Leading post-Newtonian and linear mass-ratio approximations suffice in the strong-field regime
Used to incorporate the modified moments into the signal model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5692 in / 1588 out tokens · 86123 ms · 2026-05-10T19:12:32.862146+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity
gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

The LQG parameter ξ enlarges equatorial bound orbit energy ranges, confines off-equatorial trajectories, and produces larger deviations from Kerr waveforms in EMRI models for two rotating LQG black holes, though signa...
Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level in EMRI signals to test fuzzball proposals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 17 internal anchors

[1]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[2]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[3]

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[5]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]. 24

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[6]

Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

M. Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

2010
[7]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

D. Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull.Am.Astron.Soc.51,035(2019),arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[8]

Badurina et al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), 1911.11755

L. Badurinaet al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Ob- servatory andNetwork, J. Cosmol.Astropart. P.05, 011 (2020), arXiv:1911.11755 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

Canuelet al., ELGAR—a European Laboratory for Gravitation and Atom-interferometric Research, Class

B. Canuelet al., ELGAR—a European Laboratory for Gravitation and Atom-interferometric Research, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 225017 (2020), arXiv:1911.03701 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[10]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferome- ter Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[11]

Armanoet al., Sub-Femto- g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results, Phys

M. Armanoet al., Sub-Femto- g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 231101 (2016)

2016
[12]

Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20 µHz, Phys

M. Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20 µHz, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 061101 (2018)

2018
[13]

Armanoet al.(LISA Pathfinder), In-depth analy- sis of LISA Pathfinder performance results: Time evo- lution, noise projection, physical models, and impli- cations for LISA, Phys

M. Armanoet al.(LISA Pathfinder), In-depth analy- sis of LISA Pathfinder performance results: Time evo- lution, noise projection, physical models, and impli- cations for LISA, Phys. Rev. D110, 042004 (2024), arXiv:2405.05207 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Amaro-Seoane et al., (2013), arXiv:1305.5720 [astro- ph.CO]

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(eLISA), The Gravitational Uni- verse, (2013), arXiv:1305.5720 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2013
[15]

LISA Definition Study Report

M. Colpiet al., LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[16]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[17]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), BlackHoleSpectroscopyandTestsofGeneralRelativity with GW250114, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 041403 (2026), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[18]

P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Reviews in Rela- tivity26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Laghi, N

D. Laghi, N. Tamanini, W. Del Pozzo, A. Sesana, J. Gair, S. Babak, and D. Izquierdo-Villalba, Gravitational-wave cosmology with extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.508, 4512 (2021), arXiv:2102.01708 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Auclair et al

P. Auclairet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space An- tenna, Living Reviews in Relativity26, 5 (2023), arXiv:2204.05434 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

J. R. Gair, M. Vallisneri, S. L. Larson, and J. G. Baker, Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space- Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors, Living Reviews in Relativity16, 7 (2013), arXiv:1212.5575 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[22]

Bertiet al., Tests of General Relativity and Funda- mental Physics with Space-based Gravitational Wave Detectors, Bull

E. Bertiet al., Tests of General Relativity and Funda- mental Physics with Space-based Gravitational Wave Detectors, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 32 (2019), arXiv:1903.02781 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[23]

Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen

E. Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Reviews in Relativity25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[25]

R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

1963
[26]

Echoes of ECOs: gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale

V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palen- zuela, and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave signatures of ex- otic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale, Phys. Rev. D94, 084031 (2016), arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[27]

Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark com- pact objects: a status report, Living Reviews in Rela- tivity22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[28]

Amaro-Seoane, J

P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. Cole- man Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak, Astrophysics, detection and science applications of intermediate- and extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.24, R113 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703495

work page arXiv 2007
[29]

Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ra- tio inspirals, Living Rev

P. Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals, Living Reviews in Relativity21, 4 (2018), arXiv:1205.5240 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2018
[30]

Amaro-Seoane, J

P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, A. Pound, S. A. Hughes, andC.F.Sopuerta,ResearchUpdateonExtreme-Mass- Ratio Inspirals, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.610, 012002 (2015), arXiv:1410.0958 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2015
[31]

Amaro-Seoane, The gravitational capture of compact objects by massive black holes, inHandbook of Gravita- tional Wave Astronomy(2022) p

P. Amaro-Seoane, The gravitational capture of compact objects by massive black holes, inHandbook of Gravita- tional Wave Astronomy(2022) p. 17, arXiv:2011.03059 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based inter- ferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[33]

J. R. Gair, S. Babak, A. Sesana, P. Amaro-Seoane, E. Barausse, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, and C. Sop- uerta, Prospects for observing extreme-mass-ratio inspi- rals with LISA, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.840, 012021 (2017), arXiv:1704.00009 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2017
[34]

M. C. Miller, M. Freitag, D. P. Hamilton, and V. M. Lauburg, Binary encounters with supermassive black holes: Zero-eccentricityLISAevents,Astrophys.J.Lett. 631, L117 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507133

work page arXiv 2005
[35]

Di Stefano, J

R. Di Stefano, J. Greiner, S. Murray, and M. Garcia, A new way to detect massive black holes in galaxies: the stellar remnants of tidal disruption, Astrophys. J. Lett. 551, L37 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0112434

work page arXiv 2001
[36]

M. B. Davies and A. R. King, The Stars of the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. Lett.624, L25 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503441

work page arXiv 2005
[37]

Levin, Mon

Y. Levin, Formation of massive stars and black holes in selfgravitating AGN discs, and gravitational waves in LISA band, (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0307084

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003
[38]

Levin, Starbursts near supermassive black holes: young stars in the Galactic Center, and gravitational waves in LISA band, Mon

Y. Levin, Starbursts near supermassive black holes: young stars in the Galactic Center, and gravitational waves in LISA band, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.374, 515 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0603583

work page arXiv 2007
[39]

Secunda, B

A. Secunda, B. Hernandez, J. Goodman, N. W. C. Leigh, B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, and J. I. Adorno, Evolution of Retrograde Orbiters in an Active Galac- tic Nucleus Disk, Astrophys. J. Lett.908, L27 (2021), arXiv:2009.03910 [astro-ph.HE]. 25

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

Pan and H

Z. Pan and H. Yang, Formation Rate of Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals in Active Galactic Nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103018 (2021), arXiv:2101.09146 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Z. Pan, Z. Lyu, and H. Yang, Wet extreme mass ratio inspirals may be more common for spaceborne gravita- tional wave detection, Phys. Rev. D104, 063007 (2021), arXiv:2104.01208 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

Bortolas and M

E. Bortolas and M. Mapelli, Can supernova kicks trigger EMRIs in the Galactic Centre?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.485, 2125 (2019), arXiv:1902.04581 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mi- haylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, The unique po- tential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational- wave astronomy, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 42 (2019), arXiv:1903.03686 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[44]

Cárdenas-Avendaño and C

A. Cárdenas-Avendaño and C. F. Sopuerta, Testing gravity with extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests(Springer Nature Singapore,
[45]

C. F. Sopuerta, Gravitational Waves Notes, Issue #4 : ’A Roadmap to Fundamental Physics from LISA EMRI Observations’ (2010) arXiv:1009.1402 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2010
[46]

C. F. Sopuerta, Probing the strong gravity regime with eLISA: Progress on EMRIs, ASP Conf. Ser.467, 69 (2013), arXiv:1210.0156 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[47]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

2011
[48]

F. D. Ryan, Gravitational waves from the inspiral of a compact object into a massive, axisymmetric body with arbitrary multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D52, 5707 (1995)

1995
[49]

F. D. Ryan, Effect of gravitational radiation reaction on circular orbits around a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D52, 3159 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9506023

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[50]

F. D. Ryan, Effect of gravitational radiation reaction on nonequatorial orbits around a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D53, 3064 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511062

work page arXiv 1996
[51]

F. D. Ryan, Accuracy of estimating the multipole mo- ments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D56, 1845 (1997)

1997
[52]

F. D. Ryan, Scalar waves produced by a scalar charge orbiting a massive body with arbitrary multipole mo- ments, Phys. Rev. D56, 7732 (1997)

1997
[53]

Geroch, Multipole moments

R. Geroch, Multipole moments. ii. curved space, J. Math. Phys.11, 2580 (1970)

1970
[54]

R. O. Hansen, Multipole moments of stationary space- times, J. Math. Phys.15, 4652 (1974)

1974
[55]

K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational ra- diation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

1980
[56]

Fodor, C

G. Fodor, C. Hoenselaers, and Z. Perjés, Multipole mo- ments of axisymmetric systems in relativity, J. Math. Phys.30, 2252 (1989)

1989
[57]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Engle, T. Pawlowski, and C. Van Den Broeck, Multipole moments of isolated hori- zons, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 2549 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0401114

work page arXiv 2004
[58]

Ashtekar, N

A. Ashtekar, N. Khera, M. Kolanowski, and J. Lewandowski, Non-expanding horizons: multi- poles and the symmetry group, JHEP01, 028, arXiv:2111.07873 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[59]

Horizon Multipole Moments of a Kerr Black Hole

E. Gourgoulhon, A. L. Tiec, and M. Casals, Horizon Multipole Moments of a Kerr Black Hole, (2026), arXiv:2602.05823 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[60]

Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim

W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966), [Erra- tum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

1966
[61]

Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys

B. Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

1971
[62]

S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Com- mun. Math. Phys.25, 152 (1972)

1972
[63]

P. T. Chruściel, J. L. Costa, and M. Heusler, Stationary black holes: Uniqueness and beyond, Living Reviews in Relativity15, 10.12942/lrr-2012-7 (2012)

work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-7 2012
[64]

Danzmann, LISA: Laser interferometer space an- tenna for gravitational wave measurements, Class

K. Danzmann, LISA: Laser interferometer space an- tenna for gravitational wave measurements, Class. Quant. Grav.13, A247 (1996)

1996
[65]

Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys

C. Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D57, 7089 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9703068

work page arXiv 1998
[66]

T. A. Prince, M. Tinto, S. L. Larson, and J. W. Arm- strong, The LISA optimal sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D66, 122002 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0209039

work page arXiv 2002
[67]

T. P. Sotiriou and T. A. Apostolatos, Tracing the geom- etry around a massive, axisymmetric body to measure, throughgravitationalwaves, itsmassmomentsandelec- tromagnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D71, 044005 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0410102

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2005
[68]

Brink, Spacetime Encodings I- A Spacetime Recon- struction Problem, Phys

J. Brink, Spacetime Encodings I- A Spacetime Recon- struction Problem, Phys. Rev. D78, 102001 (2008), arXiv:0807.1178 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[69]

Kastha, A

S. Kastha, A. Gupta, K. G. Arun, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and C. Van Den Broeck, Testing the multipole structure of compact binaries using gravitational wave observa- tions,Phys.Rev.D98,124033(2018),arXiv:1809.10465 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[70]

Datta and S

S. Datta and S. Bose, Probing the nature of cen- tral objects in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals with grav- itational waves, Phys. Rev. D99, 084001 (2019), arXiv:1902.01723 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[71]

Datta, R

S. Datta, R. Brito, S. Bose, P. Pani, and S. A. Hughes, Tidal heating as a discriminator for horizons in extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D101, 044004 (2020), arXiv:1910.07841 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[72]

V. S. Manko and I. D. Novikov, Generalizations of the Kerr and Kerr-Newman metrics possessing an arbitrary set of mass-multipole moments, Class. Quant. Grav.9, 2477 (1992)

1992
[73]

Chowdhuri, A

A. Chowdhuri, A. Bhattacharyya, and S. Kumar, Prospects of detecting deviations to Kerr geometry with radiation reaction effects in EMRIs, JCAP04, 001, arXiv:2311.05983 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[74]

N. A. Collins and S. A. Hughes, Towards a formalism for mapping the spacetimes of massive compact objects: Bumpy black holes and their orbits, Phys. Rev. D69, 124022 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0402063

work page arXiv 2004
[75]

S. J. Vigeland and S. A. Hughes, Spacetime and orbits of bumpy black holes, Phys. Rev. D81, 024030 (2010), arXiv:0911.1756 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[76]

S. J. Vigeland, Multipole moments of bumpy black holes, Phys. Rev. D82, 104041 (2010), arXiv:1008.1278 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2010
[77]

Vigeland, N

S. Vigeland, N. Yunes, and L. Stein, Bumpy Black Holes in Alternate Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83, 104027 (2011), arXiv:1102.3706 [gr-qc]. 26

work page arXiv 2011
[78]

C. J. Moore, A. J. K. Chua, and J. R. Gair, Gravita- tional waves from extreme mass ratio inspirals around bumpy black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 195009 (2017), arXiv:1707.00712 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[79]

Xin, W.-B

S. Xin, W.-B. Han, and S.-C. Yang, Gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals using general parametrized metrics, Phys. Rev. D100, 084055 (2019), arXiv:1812.04185 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[80]

LaHaye, C

M. LaHaye, C. Weller, D. Li, P. Bourg, Y. Chen, and H. Yang, Evolving extreme mass-ratio inspirals in a perturbed Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D113, 024069 (2026), arXiv:2510.16102 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.