pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20066 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Regular Black Holes in General Relativity from Nonlinear Electrodynamics with de Sitter Cores

A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho , Ednaldo L. B. Junior , Jos\'e Tarciso S. S. Junior , Francisco S. N. Lobo , Jorde A. A. Ramos , Manuel E. Rodrigues , Diego Rubiera-Garcia , Lu\'is F. Dias da Silva
show 1 more author
Henrique A. Vieira
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords regular black holesnonlinear electrodynamicsde Sitter coregeneral relativitymagnetic monopolesquasinormal modesEvent Horizon Telescope
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regular black hole solutions in general relativity arise from nonlinear electrodynamics with de Sitter cores.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs new regular black hole geometries in static spherical symmetry using a variable equation of state. The supporting matter is identified as a purely magnetic monopole configuration of the Maxwell-Faraday tensor in nonlinear electrodynamics, with the corresponding Lagrangian explicitly reconstructed. The solutions feature de Sitter cores at the center and asymptotic flatness. Regularity is verified through the Kretschmann scalar and energy density profiles, while energy conditions are examined. Parameters are constrained using Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sgr A* by matching the predicted central dark region size under the effective photon geometry in NLED, and dynamical stability is assessed via the quasinormal mode spectrum and time-domain analysis.

Core claim

New regular black hole solutions are presented in general relativity within a static, spherically symmetric framework governed by a variable equation of state. The matter is a purely magnetic monopole configuration in nonlinear electrodynamics, whose Lagrangian is reconstructed to ensure a de Sitter core and asymptotic flatness. The geometric structure is analyzed through metric functions, Kretschmann scalar regularity, energy density and pressure profiles, and energy conditions. Model parameters are constrained by Event Horizon Telescope data on Sgr A* accounting for NLED effects on photons, and stability is confirmed by computing quasinormal modes under scalar perturbations.

What carries the argument

A variable equation of state for the matter content, allowing explicit reconstruction of the nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian for a purely magnetic monopole that produces regular spacetimes with de Sitter cores.

If this is right

  • The geometries remain regular at the center, with finite curvature scalars replacing the central singularity.
  • The solutions can be directly compared to supermassive black hole images to bound the model parameters.
  • Energy conditions hold in certain regions but may be violated near the core, consistent with the de Sitter behavior.
  • The configurations exhibit stable quasinormal mode spectra, indicating dynamical robustness under small scalar perturbations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These constructions illustrate how nonlinear matter fields can source singularity-free black holes while remaining consistent with classical general relativity.
  • The reconstruction technique from a variable equation of state might generalize to other matter models or non-spherical symmetries.
  • Observational constraints from black hole shadows suggest these could serve as testable alternatives to vacuum solutions for certain astrophysical regimes.

Load-bearing premise

That a variable equation of state can be chosen such that the resulting nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian supports a purely magnetic monopole configuration while preserving the de Sitter core and asymptotic flatness.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the model's predicted shadow size for constrained parameters and Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sgr A*, or the appearance of unstable quasinormal modes in the scalar perturbation spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20066 by A. A. Ara\'ujo Filho, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, Ednaldo L. B. Junior, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Henrique A. Vieira, Jorde A. A. Ramos, Jos\'e Tarciso S. S. Junior, Lu\'is F. Dias da Silva, Manuel E. Rodrigues.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The NLED Lagrangian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The NLED Lagrangian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The shadow radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Radial profiles of the scalar effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Radial behavior of the scalar effective [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: The time dependence of the scalar signal is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: The asymptotic evolution of the scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: The logarithmic evolution of the scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: For Model III, the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: The time evolution of the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_22.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present new regular black hole solutions in general relativity (GR) within a static, spherically symmetric framework governed by a variable equation of state, following the approach of [Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 025024 (2025)]. The matter supporting these geometries is identified as a purely magnetic monopole configuration of the Maxwell-Faraday tensor in the context of nonlinear electrodynamics (NLED). We explicitly reconstruct the corresponding NLED Lagrangian and analyze the asymptotic and central behaviors of the solutions. The geometric structure is examined through the metric functions, the regularity of the Kretschmann scalar, and the profiles of energy density and pressures, including a discussion of the resulting energy conditions. Using Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sgr A$^*$, we constrain the model parameters by comparing the predicted size of the central dark region with the inferred observational images, taking into account the effective geometry experienced by photons in the presence of NLED. Finally, we investigate the dynamical stability of these configurations under scalar perturbations by computing the quasinormal mode spectrum and performing a time-domain analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs new regular black hole solutions in static spherically symmetric GR sourced by matter obeying a variable equation of state, identified as a purely magnetic monopole configuration in nonlinear electrodynamics. It explicitly reconstructs the corresponding NLED Lagrangian L(F), examines the metric functions, verifies Kretschmann scalar regularity and energy conditions, constrains parameters by matching the photon-sphere size to EHT observations of Sgr A* while accounting for NLED-modified photon geometry, and assesses dynamical stability through quasinormal mode spectra and time-domain analysis.

Significance. If the Lagrangian reconstruction is consistent and the solutions satisfy the Einstein equations with the required de Sitter core and asymptotic flatness, this would furnish a new family of regular black holes in NLED with potential observational implications from EHT data and stability properties. The combination of explicit reconstruction, energy-condition checks, and both frequency- and time-domain stability analysis provides a reasonably complete characterization, though the strength is tempered by the need for independent verification of the reconstruction step.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (Lagrangian reconstruction)] The reconstruction of the NLED Lagrangian L(F) from the variable equation of state p = p(ρ) for a purely magnetic monopole (F = B²(r) with B = Q/r²) must be shown to yield a single-valued L that satisfies the nonlinear Maxwell equations and produces a stress-energy tensor T_μν exactly matching G_μν/8π from the chosen metric. The paper asserts this is performed explicitly, but the absence of the explicit functional form of the variable EOS or the resulting L(F) in the provided description leaves open whether ρ(0) remains a positive constant (de Sitter core) and ρ(∞) = 0 (flatness) without additional tuning.
  2. [§5 (Observational constraints)] The parameter constraints obtained by matching the predicted size of the central dark region to Sgr A* EHT images are potentially circular: the same NLED parameters enter both the spacetime metric (hence the photon sphere) and the effective geometry experienced by photons. This procedure effectively tunes the model to the data rather than providing an independent test, weakening the claim that the solutions are observationally viable.
minor comments (2)
  1. The explicit metric functions, the precise functional form of the variable equation of state, and the step-by-step fitting procedure for the Sgr A* constraint should be stated clearly in the main text (or an appendix) to allow direct verification and reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the NLED invariant F and the effective photon metric should be introduced with a brief reminder of their definitions when first used in the stability and observational sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The positive assessment of the overall approach is appreciated. We address each major comment below with clarifications and note revisions that will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (Lagrangian reconstruction)] The reconstruction of the NLED Lagrangian L(F) from the variable equation of state p = p(ρ) for a purely magnetic monopole (F = B²(r) with B = Q/r²) must be shown to yield a single-valued L that satisfies the nonlinear Maxwell equations and produces a stress-energy tensor T_μν exactly matching G_μν/8π from the chosen metric. The paper asserts this is performed explicitly, but the absence of the explicit functional form of the variable EOS or the resulting L(F) in the provided description leaves open whether ρ(0) remains a positive constant (de Sitter core) and ρ(∞) = 0 (flatness) without additional tuning.

    Authors: Section 3 derives the variable EOS p(ρ) directly from the metric functions and reconstructs L(F) for the magnetic monopole case F = Q²/r⁴ using the standard NLED inversion procedure. The resulting L(F) is single-valued, satisfies the nonlinear Maxwell equations by construction, and ensures T_μν exactly equals G_μν/8π. The de Sitter core follows from ρ approaching a positive constant at r=0 with the metric reducing to de Sitter form, while ρ→0 at infinity guarantees asymptotic flatness; no extra tuning is required beyond the parameter choices already stated. To improve clarity we will insert the explicit analytic expressions for both p(ρ) and L(F) in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5 (Observational constraints)] The parameter constraints obtained by matching the predicted size of the central dark region to Sgr A* EHT images are potentially circular: the same NLED parameters enter both the spacetime metric (hence the photon sphere) and the effective geometry experienced by photons. This procedure effectively tunes the model to the data rather than providing an independent test, weakening the claim that the solutions are observationally viable.

    Authors: The parameters necessarily affect both the metric and the photon effective geometry because both derive from the same NLED Lagrangian; this is a feature of the model, not a flaw in the fitting procedure. We match the observed shadow size to obtain the allowed ranges of the free parameters (monopole charge and NLED coupling) for which the geometry is consistent with EHT data. This is a standard consistency constraint, not an independent prediction, and we do not claim otherwise. We will revise the wording in §5 to state explicitly that these are viability constraints rather than an external test of the model. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper selects a variable equation of state, explicitly reconstructs the NLED Lagrangian L(F) for a magnetic monopole, obtains the metric functions via Einstein equations, verifies regularity (Kretschmann scalar, de Sitter core, asymptotic flatness), and separately constrains parameters against EHT data on the photon sphere using the effective geometry. None of these steps reduce to prior outputs by definition or self-citation chain. The observational step is ordinary parameter fitting to external data, not a renamed prediction of the same fitted quantity. Self-citation to the 2025 Class. Quant. Grav. paper supplies the general method but does not carry the load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz for the specific solutions presented here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The construction rests on a variable equation of state chosen to produce a de Sitter core, the identification of that fluid with a magnetic NLED monopole, and the assumption that the resulting metric remains asymptotically flat; several free parameters in the NLED Lagrangian are then fixed by EHT data.

free parameters (2)
  • NLED Lagrangian parameters
    Several constants in the reconstructed nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian are adjusted to satisfy the variable EOS and to match the observed shadow size.
  • de Sitter core scale
    A length scale setting the curvature of the central de Sitter region is introduced and later bounded by observations.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Static, spherically symmetric metric ansatz in GR
    Standard assumption for constructing black-hole solutions; invoked in the opening framework statement.
  • domain assumption Matter is a purely magnetic monopole configuration of the Maxwell-Faraday tensor
    Central identification used to link the variable EOS to NLED; stated explicitly in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Variable equation of state fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: Source term that produces the regular de Sitter core while allowing asymptotic flatness
    Introduced to govern the geometry; no independent evidence outside the construction is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1664 out tokens · 26999 ms · 2026-05-10T00:38:20.870894+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...

  2. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...

  3. $g_{tt}g_{rr} =-1$ black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A unified framework links the generating function for static black holes satisfying g_tt g_rr=-1 in extended quasi-topological gravity to thermodynamic mass and Wald entropy via an effective 2D dilaton theory.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    IV, some considerations are required

    Shadow radius for model II To express the shadow of the model presented in Sec. IV, some considerations are required. In particu- lar, we rewrite Eqs. (62) and (63) in terms of the radial coordinate and according to the interpretation given by Eq. (39). In this way, we obtain LF (r) =− 12M r5 κ2|q|(|q|+r) 5 ,(128) LF F(r) =− 30M r9 κ2q2 (|q|+r) 6 .(129) T...

  2. [2]

    V, we also compute the shadow radius following the procedure de- veloped above

    Shadow radius for model III For the second model, as presented in Sec. V, we also compute the shadow radius following the procedure de- veloped above. To obtain the effective geometry, we cal- Model SgrA *(1σ, Keck+VLTI) SgrA *(2σ, Keck+VLTI) 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 3 4 5 6 FIG. 11: The shadow radiusr sh for our black hole model (solid blue curve), desc...

  3. [3]

    real-world

    shows a weak dependence onq, with bothℜ(ω) (real) and|ℑ(ω)|(imaginary). In contrast, higher overtones exhibit a stronger sensitivity to the deformation, par- ticularly in the imaginary part of the frequency. This effect is most pronounced forl= 0, where increasing qleads to sizable variations in the damping rates, in- dicating that the deformation modifie...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2025

  4. [4]

    Einstein, Annalen Phys.49, 769 (1916)

    A. Einstein, Annalen Phys.49, 769 (1916)

    1916

  5. [5]

    C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 191101 (2018), arXiv:1802.05304 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    C. M. Will, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 124001 (2015), arXiv:1409.7812 [physics.hist-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbottet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    J. M. M. Senovilla and D. Garfinkle, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 124008 (2015), arXiv:1410.5226 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Nature132, 1004 (1933)

    1933

  13. [13]

    Born and L

    M. Born and L. Infeld, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144, 425 (1934)

    1934

  14. [14]

    Consequences of Dirac Theory of the Positron

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys.98, 714 (1936), arXiv:physics/0605038 [physics]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1936

  15. [15]

    Plebanski,Non-Linear Electrodynamics — A Study (C.I.E.A

    J. Plebanski,Non-Linear Electrodynamics — A Study (C.I.E.A. del I.P.N., Mexico City, 1966)

    1966

  16. [16]

    S. I. Kruglov, Annals Phys.353, 299 (2014), arXiv:1410.0351 [physics.gen-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    S. I. Kruglov, Annalen Phys.527, 397 (2015), arXiv:1410.7633 [physics.gen-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    S. I. Kruglov, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 88 (2015), arXiv:1411.7741 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    A nonlinear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin, and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. D102, 121703 (2020), arXiv:2007.09092 [hep- 27 th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    J. M. Bardeen, inProceedings of the International Con- ference GR5(Tbilisi, USSR, 1968) p. 174

    1968

  21. [21]

    The Bardeen Model as a Nonlinear Magnetic Monopole

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Phys. Lett. B493, 149 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  22. [22]

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, JCAP06, 025, arXiv:1802.05095 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  23. [23]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  24. [24]

    Dymnikova,Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity,Class

    I. Dymnikova, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 4417 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407072 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Burinskii and S

    A. Burinskii and S. R. Hildebrandt, Phys. Rev. D65, 104017 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202066

    work page arXiv 2002

  26. [26]

    Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Phys. Rev. D90, 124045 (2014), arXiv:1408.0306 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Culetu,On a regular charged black hole with a nonlinear electric source,Int

    H. Culetu, Int. J. Theor. Phys.54, 2855 (2015), arXiv:1408.3334 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Breton, Gen

    N. Breton, Gen. Rel. Grav.37, 643 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0405116 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2005

  29. [29]

    Y. S. Myung, Y. W. Kim, and Y. J. Park, Phys. Lett. B 659, 832 (2008), arXiv:0705.2478 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    M. S. Ma, Annals Phys.362, 529 (2015), arXiv:1509.05580 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    S. I. Kruglov, Phys. Rev. D94, 044026 (2016), arXiv:1608.04275 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Z. Y. Fan and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D94, 124027 (2016), arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Balart and E

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, Phys. Lett. B730, 14 (2014), arXiv:1401.2136 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    S. I. Kruglov, Annalen Phys.528, 588 (2016), arXiv:1607.07726 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    S. I. Kruglov, Annals Phys.378, 59 (2017), arXiv:1703.02029 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Gullu and S

    I. Gullu and S. H. Mazharimousavi, Phys. Scripta96, 045217 (2021), arXiv:2009.08665 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Spherical black holes with regular center: a review of existing models including a recent realization with Gaussian sources

    S. Ansoldi, inConference on Black Holes and Naked Sin- gularities(2008) arXiv:0802.0330 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 76, 084018 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 029901 (2014)], arXiv:0707.1890 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D88, 024054 (2013), arXiv:1307.1812 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Karmakar and U

    R. Karmakar and U. D. Goswami, Physica Scripta99, 055003 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, and I. P. Lobo, JCAP 09, 076, arXiv:2507.17390 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333 [gr- qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D83, 024031 (2011), arXiv:1011.1843 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, and V. B. Bezerra, JCAP09, 015, arXiv:2505.08718 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Heidari, A

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, and I. P. Lobo, JCAP 09, 051, arXiv:2503.17789 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Jusufi, Phys

    K. Jusufi, Phys. Rev. D101, 124063 (2020), arXiv:2004.04664 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B861, 139288 (2025), arXiv:2408.11162 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP09, 068, arXiv:2406.11694 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, JCAP06, 026, arXiv:2501.00927 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, JCAP04, 076, arXiv:2411.06841 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Franchini and S

    N. Franchini and S. H. V¨ olkel, Testing General Rel- ativity with Black Hole Quasi-normal Modes (2024) arXiv:2305.01696 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Vertogradov and A

    V. Vertogradov and A. Ovgun, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 025024 (2025), arXiv:2408.02699 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Signatures of a de Sitter-core black hole in ringing, transmission and optical appearance

    N. Heidari, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, V. Vertogradov, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, (2024), arXiv:2412.05072 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Smoli´ c, (2026), arXiv:2603.08775 [gr-qc]

    I. Smoli´ c, (2026), arXiv:2603.08775 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de Sousa Silva, A. Simpson, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D103, 084052 (2021), arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    M. E. Rodrigues and H. A. Vieira, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 974 (2023), arXiv:2311.02138 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Falcke, F

    H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Astrophys. J. Lett.528, L13 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912263

    work page arXiv 2000

  59. [59]

    Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Tele- scope image of Sagittarius A, Class

    S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y.-D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, A. Allahyari, P. Bambhaniya, D. Dey, S. G. Ghosh, P. S. Joshi,et al., Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Novello, V

    M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klippert, Phys. Rev. D61, 045001 (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/9911085 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2000

  61. [61]

    Toshmatov, B

    B. Toshmatov, B. Ahmedov, and D. Malafarina, Phys. Rev. D103, 024026 (2021), arXiv:2101.05496 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    T. Do, A. Hees, A. Ghez, G. D. Martinez, D. S. Chu, S. Jia, S. Sakai, J. R. Lu, A. K. Gautam, K. K. O’Neil, et al., Science365, 664 (2019), arXiv:1907.10731 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Abuter et al., Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole , Astron

    R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), Astron. Astrophys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Late-Time Behavior of Stellar Collapse and Explosions: I. Linearized Perturbations

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Physical Review D49, 883 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9307009

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  65. [65]

    S. V. Bolokhov, The European Physical Journal C84, 634 (2024), arXiv:2404.09364 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Skvortsova, Gravitation and Cosmology30, 279 (2024)

    M. Skvortsova, Gravitation and Cosmology30, 279 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    W.-D. Guo, Q. Tan, and Y.-X. Liu, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics,07, 008 (2024), arXiv:2312.16605 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 454 (2025), arXiv:2410.12060 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Baruah, A

    A. Baruah, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, and A. Deshamukhya, Annals of Physics455, 169393 (2023), arXiv:2304.07761 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    C.-Y. Shao, C. Zhang, W. Zhang, and C.-G. Shao, Phys- ical Review D109, 064012 (2024), arXiv:2309.04962 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, (2025), arXiv:2510.25969 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Z.-H. Yang, C. Xu, X.-M. Kuang, B. Wang, and R.-H. Yue, Physics Letters B853, 138688 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, JCAP01, 072, arXiv:2410.23165 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv