Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Algorithmic Theories of Everything

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0011122 v2 pith:6DGZF5WE submitted 2000-11-30 quant-ph cs.AIcs.CCcs.LGhep-thmath-phmath.MPphysics.comp-ph

Algorithmic Theories of Everything

classification quant-ph cs.AIcs.CCcs.LGhep-thmath-phmath.MPphysics.comp-ph
keywords probabilityuniverseeverythingalgorithmicenumerableinductivelackingshort
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The probability distribution P from which the history of our universe is sampled represents a theory of everything or TOE. We assume P is formally describable. Since most (uncountably many) distributions are not, this imposes a strong inductive bias. We show that P(x) is small for any universe x lacking a short description, and study the spectrum of TOEs spanned by two Ps, one reflecting the most compact constructive descriptions, the other the fastest way of computing everything. The former derives from generalizations of traditional computability, Solomonoff's algorithmic probability, Kolmogorov complexity, and objects more random than Chaitin's Omega, the latter from Levin's universal search and a natural resource-oriented postulate: the cumulative prior probability of all x incomputable within time t by this optimal algorithm should be 1/t. Between both Ps we find a universal cumulatively enumerable measure that dominates traditional enumerable measures; any such CEM must assign low probability to any universe lacking a short enumerating program. We derive P-specific consequences for evolving observers, inductive reasoning, quantum physics, philosophy, and the expected duration of our universe.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prompting Complexity: Shortest Prompts for Texts and Behaviors in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The paper defines prompting complexity as the length of the shortest plausible prompt that deterministically generates a target text with a fixed language model.