Pith. sign in

super hub Canonical reference

Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection

Canonical reference. 82% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

110 Pith papers citing it
7 external citations · Pith
Background 82% of classified citations
abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. The functionalities of recent LLMs can be flexibly modulated via natural language prompts. This renders them susceptible to targeted adversarial prompting, e.g., Prompt Injection (PI) attacks enable attackers to override original instructions and employed controls. So far, it was assumed that the user is directly prompting the LLM. But, what if it is not the user prompting? We argue that LLM-Integrated Applications blur the line between data and instructions. We reveal new attack vectors, using Indirect Prompt Injection, that enable adversaries to remotely (without a direct interface) exploit LLM-integrated applications by strategically injecting prompts into data likely to be retrieved. We derive a comprehensive taxonomy from a computer security perspective to systematically investigate impacts and vulnerabilities, including data theft, worming, information ecosystem contamination, and other novel security risks. We demonstrate our attacks' practical viability against both real-world systems, such as Bing's GPT-4 powered Chat and code-completion engines, and synthetic applications built on GPT-4. We show how processing retrieved prompts can act as arbitrary code execution, manipulate the application's functionality, and control how and if other APIs are called. Despite the increasing integration and reliance on LLMs, effective mitigations of these emerging threats are currently lacking. By raising awareness of these vulnerabilities and providing key insights into their implications, we aim to promote the safe and responsible deployment of these powerful models and the development of robust defenses that protect users and systems from potential attacks.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 15 baseline 2

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into various applications. The functionalities of recent LLMs can be flexibly modulated via natural language prompts. This renders them susceptible to targeted adversarial prompting, e.g., Prompt Injection (PI) attacks enable attackers to override original instructions and employed controls. So far, it was assumed that the user is directly prompting the LLM. But, what if it is not the user prompting? We argue that LLM-Integrated Applications blur the line between data and instructions. We reveal new attack vectors, using Indirect P

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Confused ChatGPT: Cross-App Context Poisoning via First-Party APIs

cs.CR · 2026-05-30 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

Identifies cross-app context poisoning in ChatGPT Apps, a persistent indirect prompt injection delivered through undocumented first-party API parameters that lets one app manipulate others via the shared untagged context.

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

Whose Side Is Your Agent On? Multi-Party Principal Loyalty in LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.

Brain-Prompt Injection: A Route-Safety Audit for BCI-LLM Agents

cs.CR · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Introduces brain-prompt injection attacks on BCI-to-LLM agent pipelines and defines a Route-Safety Audit Contract with separation theorem, C3 decomposition, and split-conformal calibration to bound false-accept rates on EEG data.

What You Approve Is What Executes: Consent Integrity for Black-Box LLM Agents

cs.CR · 2026-06-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The paper introduces Consent Integrity as the property that actions shown for approval must be rendered by a trusted mediator from the real boundary action over an unspoofable path and bound to execution, with uninspectable actions surfaced rather than silently approved.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 110 citing papers.