Pith. sign in

hub

FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering

49 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

49 Pith papers citing it
abstract

FinanceBench is a first-of-its-kind test suite for evaluating the performance of LLMs on open book financial question answering (QA). It comprises 10,231 questions about publicly traded companies, with corresponding answers and evidence strings. The questions in FinanceBench are ecologically valid and cover a diverse set of scenarios. They are intended to be clear-cut and straightforward to answer to serve as a minimum performance standard. We test 16 state of the art model configurations (including GPT-4-Turbo, Llama2 and Claude2, with vector stores and long context prompts) on a sample of 150 cases from FinanceBench, and manually review their answers (n=2,400). The cases are available open-source. We show that existing LLMs have clear limitations for financial QA. Notably, GPT-4-Turbo used with a retrieval system incorrectly answered or refused to answer 81% of questions. While augmentation techniques such as using longer context window to feed in relevant evidence improve performance, they are unrealistic for enterprise settings due to increased latency and cannot support larger financial documents. We find that all models examined exhibit weaknesses, such as hallucinations, that limit their suitability for use by enterprises.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2 other 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 45 2025 4

polarities

background 2 unclear 1

representative citing papers

Office Comprehension Benchmark

cs.CL · 2026-05-29 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

OCB introduces File Fidelity Q&A and Domain Q&A tracks for LLM evaluation on native office files, reporting ~59.3% on domain reasoning for top systems with releases of data and tooling.

Meta-Benchmarks for Financial-Services LLM Evaluation

cs.AI · 2026-07-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.

citing papers explorer

Showing 49 of 49 citing papers.