Pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (57%).

51 Pith papers citing it
1 external citations · Pith
Background 57% of classified citations
abstract

Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks. We term agents with memory mechanisms as memory agents. In this paper, based on classic theories from memory science and cognitive science, we identify four core competencies essential for memory agents: accurate retrieval, test-time learning, long-range understanding, and selective forgetting. Existing benchmarks either rely on limited context lengths or are tailored for static, long-context settings like book-based QA, which do not reflect the interactive, multi-turn nature of memory agents that incrementally accumulate information. Moreover, no existing benchmarks cover all four competencies. We introduce MemoryAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed for memory agents. Our benchmark transforms existing long-context datasets and incorporates newly constructed datasets into a multi-turn format, effectively simulating the incremental information processing characteristic of memory agents. By carefully selecting and curating datasets, our benchmark provides comprehensive coverage of the four core memory competencies outlined above, thereby offering a systematic and challenging testbed for assessing memory quality. We evaluate a diverse set of memory agents, ranging from simple context-based and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems to advanced agents with external memory modules and tool integration. Empirical results reveal that current methods fall short of mastering all four competencies, underscoring the need for further research into comprehensive memory mechanisms for LLM agents.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 49 2025 2

representative citing papers

MedMemoryBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Personalized Healthcare

cs.AI · 2026-05-12 · conditional · novelty 8.0

MedMemoryBench supplies a 2,000-session synthetic medical trajectory dataset and an evaluate-while-constructing streaming protocol to expose memory saturation and reasoning failures in current agent architectures for personalized healthcare.

MemGym: a Long-Horizon Memory Environment for LLM Agents

cs.CL · 2026-05-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

MemGym unifies agent gyms into a memory benchmark with isolated scoring across tool-use, research, coding, and computer-use regimes plus a lightweight reward model for tractable coding evaluation.

Evaluating Cognitive Age Alignment in Interactive AI Agents

cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

The paper presents ChildAgentEval as the first psychometrically grounded benchmark comparing MLLM-based agents' reasoning performance to age-specific human cognitive stages.

SMMBench: A Benchmark for Source-Distributed Multimodal Agent Memory

cs.CL · 2026-05-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

SMMBench is a benchmark evaluating multimodal agents on cross-source reasoning, conflict resolution, preference reasoning, and action prediction, showing current systems struggle with evidence distributed across heterogeneous sources.

Belief Memory: Agent Memory Under Partial Observability

cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

BeliefMem is a probabilistic memory architecture for LLM agents that retains multiple candidate conclusions with probabilities updated by Noisy-OR, achieving superior average performance over deterministic baselines on LoCoMo and ALFWorld.

Four-Axis Decision Alignment for Long-Horizon Enterprise AI Agents

cs.AI · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Long-horizon enterprise AI agents' decisions decompose into four measurable axes, with benchmark experiments on six memory architectures revealing distinct weaknesses and reversing a pre-registered prediction on summarization.

When to Forget: A Memory Governance Primitive

cs.AI · 2026-04-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Memory Worth converges almost surely to the conditional probability of task success given memory retrieval and correlates at rho=0.89 with ground-truth utility in controlled experiments.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 51 citing papers.