pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.19154 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-24 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Dynamical system analysis of the cosmological phases in Palatini k-essence gravity

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 06:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Palatini gravityk-essencedynamical systemscosmological phasesde Sitter epochsheteroclinic orbitsquintessenceFLRW spacetime
0
0 comments X

The pith

Palatini k-essence gravity produces flat FLRW cosmologies whose phase space contains quasi-de-Sitter epochs linked by heteroclinic orbits together with scaling solutions and quintessence phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a generalized k-essence model inside a Palatini f(R) gravitational sector and rewrites the theory as a biscalar-tensor system in which the Palatini scalaron is still solved algebraically in terms of matter and the k-essence kinetic term. Conditions are derived that remove Ostrogradsky instabilities and guarantee a well-posed initial-value problem. A dynamical-systems analysis is then performed on the autonomous equations that govern a flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background; the fixed points of this system are classified by the value of their effective barotropic index. These fixed points correspond to distinct cosmic epochs and are joined by heteroclinic orbits that trace possible sequences of expansion history.

Core claim

The analysis reveals the presence of a range of possible configurations, with the existence of (quasi) de-Sitter epochs connected by heteroclinic orbits, scaling solutions and quintessence phases.

What carries the argument

The autonomous dynamical system obtained after algebraic elimination of the Palatini scalaron, whose fixed points are located and classified by the constant value of the effective barotropic index w_eff they produce.

If this is right

  • Cosmic evolution can proceed through sequences of epochs whose effective equations of state are fixed by the locations of the identified fixed points.
  • Heteroclinic orbits supply concrete transition pathways between a matter-dominated phase and a later accelerated expansion phase.
  • Scaling solutions appear in which the k-essence field energy density remains a fixed fraction of the total density throughout an epoch.
  • Quintessence phases emerge as fixed points where the effective barotropic index lies close to minus one.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The phase-space structure may permit the model to reproduce the observed succession of radiation, matter and dark-energy eras by tuning only the locations and stability of a modest number of fixed points.
  • Because the construction is shown to be analogous to a subclass of DHOST theories, similar cosmological fixed-point networks could appear in other higher-order scalar-tensor models.
  • Inclusion of spatial inhomogeneities or perturbations around the identified orbits would test whether the heteroclinic connections survive in a more realistic setting.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen functional forms of the generalized k-essence and Palatini f(R) allow the scalaron to be expressed algebraically in terms of matter and the k-essence kinetic term while keeping the theory free of Ostrogradsky modes.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the autonomous system for parameter values that admit both quasi-de-Sitter and scaling fixed points would fail to produce any heteroclinic orbit connecting them.

read the original abstract

We formulate a generalized $k$-essence model in the presence of a Palatini $f(\mathcal{R})$ gravitational sector. In the corresponding biscalar-tensor theory, we discuss the distinguished dynamical properties of the two scalar fields, elucidating how the Palatini scalaron can be still algebraically solved in terms of matter, the $k$-essence field and its kinetic term. We derive the conditions ensuring the absence of Ostrogradsky modes and the well-posedness of the initial data problem, also providing an intriguing analogy with a specific class of DHOST theories. Then, we investigate the cosmology of a flat Friedmann-Lema\^{i}tre-Robertson-Walker spacetime according a dynamical system approach, with the aim of determining the set of fixed points in the phase space, representing specific periods of the Universe evolution and characterized by different effective barotropic index $w_{\text{eff}}$. The analysis reveals the presence of a range of possible configurations, with the existence of (quasi) de-Sitter epochs connected by heteroclinic orbits, scaling solutions and quintessence phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a generalized k-essence model coupled to Palatini f(R) gravity. It reduces the theory to a biscalar-tensor equivalent in which the Palatini scalaron is algebraically solved in terms of matter density, the k-essence field and its kinetic term. Conditions for the absence of Ostrogradsky modes and well-posedness of the initial-value problem are derived, with an analogy drawn to a class of DHOST theories. A dynamical-systems analysis is then performed on the flat FLRW cosmology to locate fixed points in the phase space that correspond to distinct evolutionary epochs characterized by different effective barotropic indices, including (quasi) de-Sitter phases connected by heteroclinic orbits, scaling solutions, and quintessence phases.

Significance. If the algebraic reduction is shown to preserve second-order equations and well-posedness throughout the relevant phase space, and if the fixed-point classification is complete with stability analysis, the work would provide a useful phase-space portrait of possible cosmological histories in this class of modified-gravity models. The explicit derivation of no-ghost conditions and the dynamical-systems methodology are strengths that could be leveraged for further studies of late-time acceleration.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2: The conditions ensuring absence of Ostrogradsky modes and well-posedness are derived after algebraic elimination of the scalaron, yet the manuscript does not verify that these conditions remain satisfied at the fixed points (especially the quasi-de-Sitter and scaling solutions) or along the heteroclinic orbits connecting them. A violation at any load-bearing fixed point would render the corresponding cosmological epoch unphysical within the assumed framework.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1, after Eq. (18): The autonomous system is constructed from the reduced Friedmann and Klein-Gordon equations; however, it is not demonstrated that the algebraic substitution of the scalaron leaves the system free of residual higher-derivative terms or implicit constraints across the full (x,y,...) phase space used for the fixed-point search.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that conditions for no Ostrogradsky modes are derived but does not indicate their explicit form; a one-sentence summary of the key inequalities would improve readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 (or equivalent fixed-point table): The effective barotropic index w_eff is reported for each point, but the eigenvalues of the Jacobian are not listed; adding them would allow immediate assessment of stability without consulting the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2: The conditions ensuring absence of Ostrogradsky modes and well-posedness are derived after algebraic elimination of the scalaron, yet the manuscript does not verify that these conditions remain satisfied at the fixed points (especially the quasi-de-Sitter and scaling solutions) or along the heteroclinic orbits connecting them. A violation at any load-bearing fixed point would render the corresponding cosmological epoch unphysical within the assumed framework.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the no-Ostrogradsky and well-posedness conditions at the fixed points and along the heteroclinic orbits is necessary to confirm the physical viability of the identified cosmological epochs. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §3.2 that substitutes the coordinate values of each fixed point (including the quasi-de-Sitter and scaling solutions) into the derived conditions and verifies that they remain satisfied throughout the relevant parameter ranges. A short remark is also included confirming that the same inequalities hold along the heteroclinic orbits connecting these points. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1, after Eq. (18): The autonomous system is constructed from the reduced Friedmann and Klein-Gordon equations; however, it is not demonstrated that the algebraic substitution of the scalaron leaves the system free of residual higher-derivative terms or implicit constraints across the full (x,y,...) phase space used for the fixed-point search.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The autonomous system is obtained from the second-order equations that result after the algebraic elimination of the scalaron, as established in the preceding sections. To make this explicit, we have expanded the paragraph immediately following Eq. (18) with a brief but direct argument showing that the substitution introduces neither higher-derivative terms nor additional implicit constraints on the phase-space variables (x, y, …). This discussion is cross-referenced to the general well-posedness analysis already presented in §3. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; fixed-point analysis is independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by formulating the biscalar-tensor equivalent, algebraically solving for the Palatini scalaron, deriving conditions for absence of Ostrogradsky instabilities, and then constructing an autonomous system whose fixed points are located by setting time derivatives to zero. This last step is a direct algebraic operation on the dynamical equations and does not reduce to any pre-chosen parameter, fitted constant, or self-citation chain. The well-posedness assumptions are stated explicitly and applied uniformly; they are not smuggled in via prior self-citation nor used to define the target cosmological epochs. The resulting phase-space portraits (de-Sitter points, scaling solutions, heteroclinic orbits) therefore retain independent content relative to the input assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the general model assumptions stated in the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5492 in / 1269 out tokens · 108779 ms · 2026-05-17T06:20:04.839523+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Wiggins,Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos, Springer-Verlag, New York (1990)

    S. Wiggins,Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos, Springer-Verlag, New York (1990)

  2. [2]

    Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity

    S. Bahamonde, C.G. B¨ ohmer, S. Carloni, E.J. Copeland, W. Fang and N. Tamanini,Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity,Phys. Rept.775-777(2018) 1 [1712.03107]. – 34 – [3]Supernova Cosmology Projectcollaboration,Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae,Astrophys. J.517(1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]. [4]Supernova...

  3. [3]

    The Case for a Positive Cosmological Lambda-term

    V. Sahni and A.A. Starobinsky,The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9(2000) 373 [astro-ph/9904398]

  4. [4]

    The Cosmological Constant

    S.M. Carroll,The Cosmological constant,Living Rev. Rel.4(2001) 1 [astro-ph/0004075]

  5. [5]

    The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

    P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra,The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,Rev. Mod. Phys.75 (2003) 559 [astro-ph/0207347]

  6. [6]

    Cosmological Constant - the Weight of the Vacuum

    T. Padmanabhan,Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum,Phys. Rept.380(2003) 235 [hep-th/0212290]

  7. [7]

    Dynamics of dark energy

    E.J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15 (2006) 1753 [hep-th/0603057]

  8. [8]

    The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration

    R.R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski,The Physics of Cosmic Acceleration,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009) 397 [0903.0866]

  9. [9]

    Dark Energy

    M. Li, X.-D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang,Dark Energy,Commun. Theor. Phys.56(2011) 525 [1103.5870]

  10. [10]

    Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask)

    J. Martin,Everything You Always Wanted To Know About The Cosmological Constant Problem (But Were Afraid To Ask),Comptes Rendus Physique13(2012) 566 [1205.3365]

  11. [11]

    Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1

  12. [12]

    The Cosmological Constant is Back

    L.M. Krauss and M.S. Turner,The Cosmological constant is back,Gen. Rel. Grav.27(1995) 1137 [astro-ph/9504003]

  13. [13]

    The Cosmological Constant Problems (Talk given at Dark Matter 2000, February, 2000)

    S. Weinberg,The Cosmological constant problems, in4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000), pp. 18–26, 2, 2000, DOI [astro-ph/0005265]

  14. [14]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem and Quintessence

    V. Sahni,The Cosmological constant problem and quintessence,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3435 [astro-ph/0202076]

  15. [15]

    Issues on the cosmological constant

    J. Yokoyama,Issues on the cosmological constant, in12th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation, 5, 2003 [gr-qc/0305068]

  16. [16]

    Categorizing Different Approaches to the Cosmological Constant Problem

    S. Nobbenhuis,Categorizing different approaches to the cosmological constant problem,Found. Phys.36(2006) 613 [gr-qc/0411093]

  17. [17]

    The Cosmological Constant Problem: Why it's hard to get Dark Energy from Micro-physics

    C.P. Burgess,The Cosmological Constant Problem: Why it’s hard to get Dark Energy from Micro-physics, in100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology, pp. 149–197, 2015, DOI [1309.4133]

  18. [18]

    Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden,Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model,Phys. Rept.568(2015) 1 [1407.0059]

  19. [19]

    Beyond $\Lambda$CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead

    P. Bull et al.,BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead,Phys. Dark Univ.12 (2016) 56 [1512.05356]

  20. [20]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pavon,Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures, Rept. Prog. Phys.79(2016) 096901 [1603.08299]

  21. [21]

    Challenges for Superstring Cosmology

    R. Brustein and P.J. Steinhardt,Challenges for superstring cosmology,Phys. Lett. B302 (1993) 196 [hep-th/9212049]. – 35 –

  22. [22]

    The Cosmological Constant From The Viewpoint Of String Theory

    E. Witten,The Cosmological constant from the viewpoint of string theory, in4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe (DM 2000), pp. 27–36, 3, 2000 [hep-ph/0002297]

  23. [23]

    de Sitter Vacua in String Theory

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240]

  24. [24]

    The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape

    J. Polchinski,The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape, in23rd Solvay Conference in Physics: The Quantum Structure of Space and Time, pp. 216–236, 3, 2006 [hep-th/0603249]

  25. [25]

    What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?

    U.H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet,What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2018) 1830007 [1804.01120]

  26. [26]

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

    I. Zlatev, L.-M. Wang and P.J. Steinhardt,Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 896 [astro-ph/9807002]

  27. [27]

    Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence

    D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl,Holographic dark energy and cosmic coincidence,Phys. Lett. B628 (2005) 206 [gr-qc/0505020]

  28. [28]

    Aspects of the cosmological "coincidence problem"

    H.E.S. Velten, R.F. vom Marttens and W. Zimdahl,Aspects of the cosmological “coincidence problem”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3160 [1410.2509]. [31]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,JCAP02(2025) 021 [2404.03002]

  29. [29]

    Giar` e,Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae,Phys

    W. Giar` e,Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023508 [2409.17074]

  30. [30]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J.T. Firouzjaee,Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements,JCAP10(2024) 035 [2407.16689]. [34]DESIcollaboration,Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083511 [2503.14743]. [35]DESIcollaboration,Dynamical Dark Energy in light of...

  31. [31]

    Conditions for the cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models

    L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa,Conditions for the cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 083504 [gr-qc/0612180]

  32. [32]

    Phantom crossing, equation-of-state singularities, and local gravity constraints in f(R) models

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa,Phantom crossing, equation-of-state singularities, and local gravity constraints in f(R) models,Phys. Lett. B660(2008) 125 [0705.0396]

  33. [33]

    The phase space view of f(R) gravity

    J.C.C. de Souza and V. Faraoni,The Phase space view of f(R) gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) 3637 [0706.1223]

  34. [34]

    S. Fay, R. Tavakol and S. Tsujikawa,f(R) gravity theories in Palatini formalism: Cosmological dynamics and observational constraints,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 063509 [astro-ph/0701479]

  35. [35]

    A. Alho, S. Carloni and C. Uggla,On dynamical systems approaches and methods inf(R) cosmology,JCAP08(2016) 064 [1607.05715]

  36. [36]

    f(R,T) Cosmological Models in Phase Space

    H. Shabani and M. Farhoudi,f(R,T) Cosmological Models in Phase Space,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 044048 [1306.3164]

  37. [37]

    Dynamical analysis of nonminimal coupled theories

    R. Ribeiro and J. P´ aramos,Dynamical analysis of nonminimal coupled theories,Phys. Rev. D 90(2014) 124065 [1409.3046]

  38. [38]

    Dynamical analysis of generalised $f(R,\mathcal{L})$ theories

    R.P.L. Azevedo and J. P´ aramos,Dynamical analysis of generalized f(R,L) theories,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 064036 [1606.08919]. – 36 –

  39. [39]

    A dynamical system analysis of hybrid metric-Palatini cosmologies

    S. Carloni, T. Koivisto and F.S.N. Lobo,Dynamical system analysis of hybrid metric-Palatini cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 064035 [1507.04306]

  40. [40]

    J.L. Rosa, S. Carloni, J.P.d.S.e. Lemos and F.S.N. Lobo,Cosmological solutions in generalized hybrid metric-Palatini gravity,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 124035 [1703.03335]

  41. [41]

    J.L. Rosa, S. Carloni and J.P.S. Lemos,Cosmological phase space of generalized hybrid metric-Palatini theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 104056 [1908.07778]

  42. [42]

    The Cosmology of Generalized Modified Gravity Models

    S.M. Carroll, A. De Felice, V. Duvvuri, D.A. Easson, M. Trodden and M.S. Turner,The Cosmology of generalized modified gravity models,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063513 [astro-ph/0410031]

  43. [43]

    The phase-space of generalized Gauss-Bonnet dark energy

    M. Alimohammadi and A. Ghalee,The Phase-space of generalized Gauss-Bonnet dark energy, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 043006 [0908.1150]

  44. [44]

    Chatzarakis and V.K

    N. Chatzarakis and V.K. Oikonomou,Autonomous dynamical system of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet cosmologies,Annals Phys.419(2020) 168216 [1908.08141]

  45. [45]

    Oikonomou and N

    V.K. Oikonomou and N. Chatzarakis,The Phase Space ofk-Essencef(R)Gravity Theory, Nucl. Phys. B956(2020) 115023 [1905.01904]

  46. [46]

    $k$-essence $f(R)$ Gravity Inflation

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou,k-essencef(R)gravity inflation,Nucl. Phys. B 941(2019) 11 [1902.03669]

  47. [47]

    Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric formalism

    G.J. Olmo,Post-Newtonian constraints on f(R) cosmologies in metric and Palatini formalism, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083505 [gr-qc/0505135]

  48. [48]

    Sotiriou and S

    T.P. Sotiriou and S. Liberati,Metric-affine f(R) theories of gravity,Annals of Physics322 (2007) 935

  49. [49]

    Palatini Approach to Modified Gravity: f(R) Theories and Beyond

    G.J. Olmo,Palatini Approach to Modified Gravity: f(R) Theories and Beyond,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011) 413 [1101.3864]

  50. [50]

    Kubota, K.-Y

    M. Kubota, K.-Y. Oda, K. Shimada and M. Yamaguchi,Cosmological Perturbations in Palatini Formalism,JCAP03(2021) 006 [2010.07867]

  51. [51]

    Ghost-free Palatini derivative scalar-tensor theory: desingularization and the speed test

    D. Gal’tsov and S. Zhidkova,Ghost-free Palatini derivative scalar–tensor theory: Desingularization and the speed test,Phys. Lett. B790(2019) 453 [1808.00492]

  52. [52]

    Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations

    J. Ben Achour, D. Langlois and K. Noui,Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski and disformal transformations,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 124005 [1602.08398]

  53. [53]

    Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability

    D. Langlois and K. Noui,Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability,JCAP02(2016) 034 [1510.06930]

  54. [54]

    Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor Theories

    D. Langlois, M. Mancarella, K. Noui and F. Vernizzi,Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor Theories,JCAP05(2017) 033 [1703.03797]

  55. [55]

    Scalar-tensor theories and modified gravity in the wake of GW170817

    D. Langlois, R. Saito, D. Yamauchi and K. Noui,Scalar-tensor theories and modified gravity in the wake of GW170817,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 061501 [1711.07403]

  56. [56]

    Torsion/non-metricity duality in f(R) gravity

    D. Iosifidis, A.C. Petkou and C.G. Tsagas,Torsion/non-metricity duality in f(R) gravity,Gen. Rel. Grav.51(2019) 66 [1810.06602]

  57. [57]

    k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry

    E. Babichev, V. Mukhanov and A. Vikman,k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry,JHEP02(2008) 101 [0708.0561]

  58. [58]

    Formation of caustics in k-essence and Horndeski theory

    E. Babichev,Formation of caustics in k-essence and Horndeski theory,JHEP04(2016) 129 [1602.00735]

  59. [59]

    Recovering P(X) from a canonical complex field

    E. Babichev, S. Ramazanov and A. Vikman,RecoveringP(X)from a canonical complex field, JCAP11(2018) 023 [1807.10281]. – 37 –

  60. [60]

    Bombacigno, S

    F. Bombacigno, S. Boudet, G.J. Olmo and G. Montani,Big bounce and future time singularity resolution in Bianchi I cosmologies: The projective invariant Nieh-Yan case,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 124031 [2105.06870]

  61. [61]

    Bombacigno and F

    F. Bombacigno and F. Moretti,Weak-field limit of Palatinik-essence theories,To appear (2025)

  62. [62]

    J¨ arv and A

    L. J¨ arv and A. Toporensky,Global portraits of nonminimal inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 179 [2104.10183]

  63. [63]

    J¨ arv, S

    L. J¨ arv, S. Karamitsos and M. Saal,Global portraits of nonminimal inflation: Metric and Palatini formalism,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 084073 [2401.12314]. – 38 –