pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.15023 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-21 · ✦ hep-th · nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Carroll hydrodynamics with spin

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th nucl-th
keywords Carroll hydrodynamicsspin currentc to 0 limitrelativistic hydrodynamicsboost-invariant flowBjorken flowGubser flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

The vanishing speed of light limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin produces Carroll hydrodynamics that includes a spin current.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that Carroll hydrodynamics acquires a spin current when derived as the c to zero limit of relativistic hydrodynamics. The derivation begins with a pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and fluid variables that already contain spin, then takes the limit to obtain the Carrollian equations. The result extends an existing connection between Carrollian geometry and boost-invariant flows in ultrarelativistic fluids. A reader would care because it supplies a controlled way to add spin to models used for quark-gluon plasma dynamics.

Core claim

Starting from the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom for a relativistic fluid endowed with a spin current, the c to 0 limit produces the equations of Carroll hydrodynamics that now include the spin current. This construction preserves the known identification of boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow with Carrollian structures once spin is added.

What carries the argument

The c to 0 limit applied to the pre-ultralocal parametrization of relativistic hydrodynamics that already carries a spin current.

If this is right

  • The Carrollian equations now contain an independent spin current whose conservation follows from the limit.
  • Boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow acquire consistent spin degrees of freedom within the Carrollian framework.
  • The mapping between ultrarelativistic fluid models and Carrollian geometry continues to hold after spin is included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spin polarization observables in heavy-ion collisions could be re-expressed using the Carrollian equations derived here.
  • The same pre-ultralocal limiting procedure offers a template for adding other conserved currents to Carroll hydrodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The pre-ultralocal parametrization of the geometry and fluid variables can be taken to the c equals zero limit while keeping the spin current structure consistent and free of extra inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the c to 0 limit starting from the known constitutive relations of relativistic spin hydrodynamics that produces equations different from the Carrollian ones derived in the paper.

read the original abstract

We formulate Carroll hydrodynamics with the inclusion of a spin current. Our strategy relies on the fact that the $c\to 0$ limit of relativistic hydrodynamics yields the equations of Carroll hydrodynamics. Starting with the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom for a relativistic fluid endowed with a spin current, the $c\to 0$ limit produces Carroll hydrodynamics with spin. It is known that boost-invariant hydrodynamic models for ultrarelativistic fluids relevant for the physics of quark-gluon plasma, such as Bjorken and Gubser flow, are manifestations of Carroll hydrodynamics under appropriate geometric choices for the underlying Carrollian structure. In this work, we further this mapping between such boost-invariant models and Carroll hydrodynamics, now with the inclusion of a spin current.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that Carroll hydrodynamics with a spin current can be obtained as the c→0 limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin, starting from the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the metric and fluid variables. It extends this construction to boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow, now including spin degrees of freedom.

Significance. If the limit is carried through rigorously, the work supplies a systematic route to spin-inclusive Carrollian hydrodynamics and strengthens the link between Carrollian geometry and ultrarelativistic boost-invariant flows relevant to heavy-ion collisions. The use of a standard geometric limit is a positive feature, but the absence of explicit verification for the spin sector limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (pre-ultralocal parametrization and c→0 limit): the central claim that the spin current survives the limit intact requires explicit scaling exponents for the spin chemical potential, spin density, and spin tensor components. Without these scalings stated and substituted into the conservation laws, it is impossible to confirm that no divergent or vanishing terms appear in the degenerate Carrollian structure.
  2. [§4] §4 (Carrollian equations with spin): the reduction of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law must be shown term-by-term after the limit is taken; the current presentation leaves open whether the Carrollian spin current is non-trivial or identically zero.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from displaying at least one of the resulting Carrollian constitutive relations or conservation equations.
  2. Notation for the Carrollian spin current should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the limit section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points where additional explicit details would strengthen the presentation. We agree that the scalings and term-by-term reductions for the spin sector should be stated more clearly and will incorporate them in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (pre-ultralocal parametrization and c→0 limit): the central claim that the spin current survives the limit intact requires explicit scaling exponents for the spin chemical potential, spin density, and spin tensor components. Without these scalings stated and substituted into the conservation laws, it is impossible to confirm that no divergent or vanishing terms appear in the degenerate Carrollian structure.

    Authors: We agree that the scalings must be written explicitly. In the revised version we will assign the following leading-order scalings in the pre-ultralocal frame: spin chemical potential μ_s ∼ c^0, spin density s ∼ c^0, and the independent components of the spin tensor S^{μν} with powers chosen so that the combination entering the stress-energy and spin-current conservation laws remains finite and non-vanishing as c→0. Substituting these scalings into the relativistic conservation equations yields a well-defined Carrollian limit without divergent or identically zero terms; the resulting Carrollian spin current is non-trivial and couples to the Carrollian fluid velocity and vorticity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Carrollian equations with spin): the reduction of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law must be shown term-by-term after the limit is taken; the current presentation leaves open whether the Carrollian spin current is non-trivial or identically zero.

    Authors: We will add an explicit term-by-term expansion of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law ∇_μ S^{μν} = … in the c→0 limit. After inserting the pre-ultralocal metric and the scalings above, each relativistic term maps to a distinct Carrollian contribution; the surviving equation is non-trivial and reduces to a conservation law for the Carrollian spin current that is sourced by the Carrollian vorticity and acceleration. This demonstrates that the spin current does not vanish identically. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in c→0 limit derivation from relativistic hydrodynamics

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies the known c→0 limit to relativistic hydrodynamics (with spin current) under pre-ultralocal geometry parametrization to obtain Carroll hydrodynamics with spin. This is a standard limiting procedure relying on an external relativistic framework rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The abstract and description indicate the result follows directly from the limit without reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the c→0 limit procedure applied to spin-inclusive relativistic hydrodynamics and the pre-ultralocal parametrization.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The c→0 limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin produces Carroll hydrodynamics with spin
    This is the foundational strategy stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1115 out tokens · 34914 ms · 2026-05-16T12:10:47.529872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon and B. Schenke,Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1340011 [1301.5893]

  2. [2]

    Parkkila, A

    J.E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad and D.J. Kim,Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma with additional flow harmonic observables,Phys. Rev. C 104(2021) 054904

  3. [3]

    Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics

    P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  4. [4]

    Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics

    F. Becattini, W. Florkowski and E. Speranza,Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 419 [1807.10994]

  5. [5]

    Becattini,Does the spin tensor play any role in non-gravitational physics?,Nucl

    F. Becattini,Does the spin tensor play any role in non-gravitational physics?,Nucl. Phys. A 1005(2021) 121833 [2003.01406]

  6. [6]

    Weickgenannt, E

    N. Weickgenannt, E. Speranza, X.-l. Sheng, Q. Wang and D.H. Rischke,Derivation of the nonlocal collision term in the relativistic Boltzmann equation for massive spin-1/2 particles from quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 016022 [2103.04896]

  7. [7]

    B. Betz, M. Gyulassy and G. Torrieri,Polarization probes of vorticity in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C76(2007) 044901 [0708.0035]

  8. [8]

    Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy

    F. Becattini, F. Piccinini and J. Rizzo,Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy,Phys. Rev. C77(2008) 024906 [0711.1253]

  9. [9]

    Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna and E. Grossi,Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium,Annals Phys.338(2013) 32 [1303.3431]

  10. [10]

    Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal and E. Speranza,Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin, Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 041901 [1705.00587]

  11. [11]

    Spin-dependent distribution functions for relativistic hydrodynamics of spin-1/2 particles

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, R. Ryblewski and E. Speranza,Spin-dependent distribution functions for relativistic hydrodynamics of spin-1/2 particles,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 116017 [1712.07676]

  12. [12]

    Thermodynamic versus kinetic approach to polarization-vorticity coupling

    W. Florkowski, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Thermodynamic versus kinetic approach to polarization-vorticity coupling,Phys. Rev. C98(2018) 044906 [1806.02616]

  13. [13]

    Bhadury, W

    S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Relativistic dissipative spin dynamics in the relaxation time approximation,Phys. Lett. B814(2021) 136096 [2002.03937]

  14. [14]

    Bhadury, W

    S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Dissipative Spin Dynamics in Relativistic Matter,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 014030 [2008.10976]

  15. [15]

    Weickgenannt, D

    N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza and D.H. Rischke,Relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics from kinetic theory with a nonlocal collision term,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L091901 [2208.01955]. – 31 –

  16. [16]

    Florkowski and M

    W. Florkowski and M. Hontarenko,Generalized Thermodynamic Relations for Perfect Spin Hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 082302 [2405.03263]

  17. [17]

    Drogosz, W

    Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski and M. Hontarenko,Hybrid approach to perfect and dissipative spin hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096018 [2408.03106]

  18. [18]

    Bhadury, Z

    S. Bhadury, Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski, S.K. Kar and V. Mykhaylova,Local equilibrium Wigner function for spin-1/2 particles,2505.02657

  19. [19]

    Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis

    K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo and H. Taya,Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis,Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 100 [1901.06615]

  20. [20]

    Biswas, A

    R. Biswas, A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski and R. Ryblewski,Relativistic second-order spin hydrodynamics: An entropy-current analysis,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 014024 [2304.01009]

  21. [21]

    Becattini, A

    F. Becattini, A. Daher and X.-L. Sheng,Entropy current and entropy production in relativistic spin hydrodynamics,Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138533 [2309.05789]

  22. [22]

    Becattini and R

    F. Becattini and R. Singh,On the local thermodynamic relations in relativistic spin hydrodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1338 [2506.20681]

  23. [23]

    S. Fang, K. Fukushima, S. Pu and D.-L. Wang,Relativistic spin hydrodynamics with antisymmetric spin tensors and an extension of the Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi equation, 2506.20698

  24. [24]

    Gallegos and U

    A.D. Gallegos and U. Gürsoy,Holographic spin liquids and Lovelock Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP11(2020) 151 [2004.05148]

  25. [25]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  26. [26]

    Abboud, L

    N. Abboud, L. Gavassino, R. Singh and E. Speranza,Perfect spinfluid: A divergence-type approach,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 094043 [2506.19786]

  27. [27]

    Chiarini, J

    A. Chiarini, J. Sammet and M. Shokri,Semi-Classical Spin Hydrodynamics in Flat and Curved Spacetime: Covariance, Linear Waves, and Bjorken Background,2412.19854

  28. [28]

    Gallegos, U

    A.D. Gallegos, U. Gürsoy and A. Yarom,Hydrodynamics of spin currents,SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 041 [2101.04759]

  29. [29]

    Hongo, X.-G

    M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov and H.-U. Yee,Relativistic spin hydrodynamics with torsion and linear response theory for spin relaxation,JHEP11(2021) 150 [2107.14231]

  30. [30]

    Gallegos, U

    A.D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy and A. Yarom,Hydrodynamics, spin currents and torsion,JHEP 05(2023) 139 [2203.05044]

  31. [31]

    Bjorken,Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region,Phys

    J.D. Bjorken,Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region,Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 140

  32. [32]

    Gubser,Symmetry constraints on generalizations of bjorken flow,Phys

    S.S. Gubser,Symmetry constraints on generalizations of bjorken flow,Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 085027

  33. [33]

    Conformal hydrodynamics in Minkowski and de Sitter spacetimes

    S.S. Gubser and A. Yarom,Conformal hydrodynamics in Minkowski and de Sitter spacetimes,Nucl. Phys. B846(2011) 469 [1012.1314]

  34. [34]

    Spin polarization evolution in a boost invariant hydrodynamical background

    W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, R. Ryblewski and R. Singh,Spin polarization evolution in a boost invariant hydrodynamical background,Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 044910 [1901.09655]. – 32 –

  35. [35]

    Singh, G

    R. Singh, G. Sophys and R. Ryblewski,Spin polarization dynamics in the Gubser-expanding background,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 074024 [2011.14907]

  36. [36]

    Wang, X.-Q

    D.-L. Wang, X.-Q. Xie, S. Fang and S. Pu,Analytic solutions of relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics with radial expansion in Gubser flow,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 114050 [2112.15535]

  37. [37]

    Bagchi, K.S

    A. Bagchi, K.S. Kolekar and A. Shukla,Carrollian Origins of Bjorken Flow,Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) 241601 [2302.03053]

  38. [38]

    Bagchi, K.S

    A. Bagchi, K.S. Kolekar, T. Mandal and A. Shukla,Heavy-ion collisions, Gubser flow, and Carroll hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 056004 [2310.03167]

  39. [39]

    Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincaré, inAnnales de l’institut Henri Poincaré

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincaré, inAnnales de l’institut Henri Poincaré. Section A, Physique Théorique, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, 1965

  40. [40]

    Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim

    N.D. Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim. A44(1966) 512

  41. [41]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, 2506.16164

  42. [42]

    Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

    K. Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

  43. [43]

    Ciambelli and P

    L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson,Foundations of Carrollian Geometry,2510.21651

  44. [44]

    Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids

    L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A.C. Petkou, P.M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos,Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids,Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 165001 [1802.05286]

  45. [45]

    Petkou, P.M

    A.C. Petkou, P.M. Petropoulos, D.R. Betancour and K. Siampos,Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,JHEP09(2022) 162 [2205.09142]

  46. [46]

    Armas and E

    J. Armas and E. Have,Carrollian Fluids and Spontaneous Breaking of Boost Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 161606 [2308.10594]

  47. [47]

    Bidussi, J

    L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus and S. Prohazka,Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 205 [2111.03668]

  48. [48]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam and S. Mondal,Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands,JHEP03(2023) 227 [2211.11640]

  49. [49]

    N. Ara, A. Banerjee, R. Basu and B. Krishnan,Flat bands and compact localised states: A Carrollian roadmap,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 046 [2412.18965]

  50. [50]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Mondal and S. Sarkar,Carroll in Shallow Water,2411.04190

  51. [51]

    Biswas, A

    S. Biswas, A. Dubey, S. Mondal, A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and A. Bagchi,Carroll at Phase Separation,2501.16426

  52. [52]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]

  53. [53]

    Kolekar, T

    K.S. Kolekar, T. Mandal, A. Shukla and P. Soni,Hydrodynamics in the Carrollian Regime, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41(2026) 2650016 [2409.18763]

  54. [54]

    Hansen, N.A

    D. Hansen, N.A. Obers, G. Oling and B.T. Sogaard,Carroll Expansion of General Relativity, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 055 [2112.12684]

  55. [55]

    Jaiswal,Spin-hydrodynamics of electrons in graphene and magnetization due to thermal vorticity,2409.07764

    A. Jaiswal,Spin-hydrodynamics of electrons in graphene and magnetization due to thermal vorticity,2409.07764. – 33 –

  56. [56]

    Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions

    N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla and T. Sharma, Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions,JHEP09(2012) 046 [1203.3544]

  57. [57]

    Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current

    K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz and A. Yarom,Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 101601 [1203.3556]

  58. [58]

    Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter

    P. Kovtun,Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter,JHEP07(2016) 028 [1606.01226]

  59. [59]

    Kubo formulas for thermodynamic transport coefficients

    P. Kovtun and A. Shukla,Kubo formulas for thermodynamic transport coefficients,JHEP10 (2018) 007 [1806.05774]

  60. [60]

    Shukla,Equilibrium thermodynamic susceptibilities for a dense degenerate Dirac field, Phys

    A. Shukla,Equilibrium thermodynamic susceptibilities for a dense degenerate Dirac field, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 096010 [1906.02334]

  61. [61]

    Kovtun and A

    P. Kovtun and A. Shukla,Einstein’s equations in matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 104051 [1907.04976]

  62. [62]

    De Groot, W.A

    S.R. De Groot, W.A. Van Leeuwen and C.G. Van Weert,Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications, North-Holland Publishing Company (1980)

  63. [63]

    Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull

    M. Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull. Soc. Math. Belg.31(1979) 47

  64. [64]

    Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons, P.A. Horvathy and P.M. Zhang,Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 085016 [1402.0657]

  65. [65]

    Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective

    X. Bekaert and K. Morand,Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective,J. Math. Phys.59(2018) 072503 [1505.03739]

  66. [66]

    Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity

    J. Hartong,Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,JHEP08(2015) 069 [1505.05011]

  67. [67]

    Physical Aspects of the Space-Time Torsion

    I.L. Shapiro,Physical aspects of the space-time torsion,Phys. Rept.357(2002) 113 [hep-th/0103093]

  68. [68]

    P.-X. Hao, W. Song, Z. Xiao and X. Xie,BMS-invariant free fermion models,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) 025002 [2211.06927]

  69. [69]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. Dutta and S. Mondal,Carroll fermions in two dimensions,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 125020 [2211.11639]

  70. [70]

    Bergshoeff, A

    E.A. Bergshoeff, A. Campoleoni, A. Fontanella, L. Mele and J. Rosseel,Carroll fermions, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 153 [2312.00745]

  71. [71]

    Ekiz, E.O

    E. Ekiz, E.O. Kahya and U. Zorba,Quantization of Carrollian fermions,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 105019 [2502.05645]

  72. [72]

    Grumiller, L

    D. Grumiller, L. Mele and L. Montecchio,Carroll spinors,Modern Physics Letters A(2026) 2540003 [2509.19426]

  73. [73]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll stories,JHEP09 (2023) 148 [2307.06827]

  74. [74]

    Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff

    A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. Rattazzi,Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,JHEP06(2015) 155 [1501.03845]. – 34 –