Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremCarroll hydrodynamics with spin
Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:10 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The vanishing speed of light limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin produces Carroll hydrodynamics that includes a spin current.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Starting from the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom for a relativistic fluid endowed with a spin current, the c to 0 limit produces the equations of Carroll hydrodynamics that now include the spin current. This construction preserves the known identification of boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow with Carrollian structures once spin is added.
What carries the argument
The c to 0 limit applied to the pre-ultralocal parametrization of relativistic hydrodynamics that already carries a spin current.
If this is right
- The Carrollian equations now contain an independent spin current whose conservation follows from the limit.
- Boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow acquire consistent spin degrees of freedom within the Carrollian framework.
- The mapping between ultrarelativistic fluid models and Carrollian geometry continues to hold after spin is included.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Spin polarization observables in heavy-ion collisions could be re-expressed using the Carrollian equations derived here.
- The same pre-ultralocal limiting procedure offers a template for adding other conserved currents to Carroll hydrodynamics.
Load-bearing premise
The pre-ultralocal parametrization of the geometry and fluid variables can be taken to the c equals zero limit while keeping the spin current structure consistent and free of extra inconsistencies.
What would settle it
An explicit calculation of the c to 0 limit starting from the known constitutive relations of relativistic spin hydrodynamics that produces equations different from the Carrollian ones derived in the paper.
read the original abstract
We formulate Carroll hydrodynamics with the inclusion of a spin current. Our strategy relies on the fact that the $c\to 0$ limit of relativistic hydrodynamics yields the equations of Carroll hydrodynamics. Starting with the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom for a relativistic fluid endowed with a spin current, the $c\to 0$ limit produces Carroll hydrodynamics with spin. It is known that boost-invariant hydrodynamic models for ultrarelativistic fluids relevant for the physics of quark-gluon plasma, such as Bjorken and Gubser flow, are manifestations of Carroll hydrodynamics under appropriate geometric choices for the underlying Carrollian structure. In this work, we further this mapping between such boost-invariant models and Carroll hydrodynamics, now with the inclusion of a spin current.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that Carroll hydrodynamics with a spin current can be obtained as the c→0 limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin, starting from the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the metric and fluid variables. It extends this construction to boost-invariant solutions such as Bjorken and Gubser flow, now including spin degrees of freedom.
Significance. If the limit is carried through rigorously, the work supplies a systematic route to spin-inclusive Carrollian hydrodynamics and strengthens the link between Carrollian geometry and ultrarelativistic boost-invariant flows relevant to heavy-ion collisions. The use of a standard geometric limit is a positive feature, but the absence of explicit verification for the spin sector limits the immediate impact.
major comments (2)
- [§3] §3 (pre-ultralocal parametrization and c→0 limit): the central claim that the spin current survives the limit intact requires explicit scaling exponents for the spin chemical potential, spin density, and spin tensor components. Without these scalings stated and substituted into the conservation laws, it is impossible to confirm that no divergent or vanishing terms appear in the degenerate Carrollian structure.
- [§4] §4 (Carrollian equations with spin): the reduction of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law must be shown term-by-term after the limit is taken; the current presentation leaves open whether the Carrollian spin current is non-trivial or identically zero.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract would benefit from displaying at least one of the resulting Carrollian constitutive relations or conservation equations.
- Notation for the Carrollian spin current should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the limit section.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points where additional explicit details would strengthen the presentation. We agree that the scalings and term-by-term reductions for the spin sector should be stated more clearly and will incorporate them in the revised manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [§3] §3 (pre-ultralocal parametrization and c→0 limit): the central claim that the spin current survives the limit intact requires explicit scaling exponents for the spin chemical potential, spin density, and spin tensor components. Without these scalings stated and substituted into the conservation laws, it is impossible to confirm that no divergent or vanishing terms appear in the degenerate Carrollian structure.
Authors: We agree that the scalings must be written explicitly. In the revised version we will assign the following leading-order scalings in the pre-ultralocal frame: spin chemical potential μ_s ∼ c^0, spin density s ∼ c^0, and the independent components of the spin tensor S^{μν} with powers chosen so that the combination entering the stress-energy and spin-current conservation laws remains finite and non-vanishing as c→0. Substituting these scalings into the relativistic conservation equations yields a well-defined Carrollian limit without divergent or identically zero terms; the resulting Carrollian spin current is non-trivial and couples to the Carrollian fluid velocity and vorticity. revision: yes
-
Referee: [§4] §4 (Carrollian equations with spin): the reduction of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law must be shown term-by-term after the limit is taken; the current presentation leaves open whether the Carrollian spin current is non-trivial or identically zero.
Authors: We will add an explicit term-by-term expansion of the relativistic spin-tensor conservation law ∇_μ S^{μν} = … in the c→0 limit. After inserting the pre-ultralocal metric and the scalings above, each relativistic term maps to a distinct Carrollian contribution; the surviving equation is non-trivial and reduces to a conservation law for the Carrollian spin current that is sourced by the Carrollian vorticity and acceleration. This demonstrates that the spin current does not vanish identically. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in c→0 limit derivation from relativistic hydrodynamics
full rationale
The paper's central derivation applies the known c→0 limit to relativistic hydrodynamics (with spin current) under pre-ultralocal geometry parametrization to obtain Carroll hydrodynamics with spin. This is a standard limiting procedure relying on an external relativistic framework rather than any self-referential definition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The abstract and description indicate the result follows directly from the limit without reduction to the paper's own inputs by construction. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit the enumerated circular patterns.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The c→0 limit of relativistic hydrodynamics with spin produces Carroll hydrodynamics with spin
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Starting with the pre-ultralocal parametrization of the background geometry and the hydrodynamic degrees of freedom for a relativistic fluid endowed with a spin current, the c→0 limit produces Carroll hydrodynamics with spin.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
the equations of Carroll hydrodynamics with a spin current... kμ∂μϵ=(ϵ+P)K, ... kμ∇μsνλ=bKsνλ−2bKμσûσk[νsλ]μ
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
C. Gale, S. Jeon and B. Schenke,Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28(2013) 1340011 [1301.5893]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[2]
J.E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad and D.J. Kim,Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma with additional flow harmonic observables,Phys. Rev. C 104(2021) 054904
work page 2021
-
[3]
Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics
P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[4]
Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics
F. Becattini, W. Florkowski and E. Speranza,Spin tensor and its role in non-equilibrium thermodynamics,Phys. Lett. B789(2019) 419 [1807.10994]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[5]
Becattini,Does the spin tensor play any role in non-gravitational physics?,Nucl
F. Becattini,Does the spin tensor play any role in non-gravitational physics?,Nucl. Phys. A 1005(2021) 121833 [2003.01406]
-
[6]
N. Weickgenannt, E. Speranza, X.-l. Sheng, Q. Wang and D.H. Rischke,Derivation of the nonlocal collision term in the relativistic Boltzmann equation for massive spin-1/2 particles from quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 016022 [2103.04896]
-
[7]
B. Betz, M. Gyulassy and G. Torrieri,Polarization probes of vorticity in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C76(2007) 044901 [0708.0035]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[8]
Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy
F. Becattini, F. Piccinini and J. Rizzo,Angular momentum conservation in heavy ion collisions at very high energy,Phys. Rev. C77(2008) 024906 [0711.1253]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[9]
Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium
F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna and E. Grossi,Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium,Annals Phys.338(2013) 32 [1303.3431]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[10]
Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin
W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal and E. Speranza,Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin, Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 041901 [1705.00587]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[11]
Spin-dependent distribution functions for relativistic hydrodynamics of spin-1/2 particles
W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, R. Ryblewski and E. Speranza,Spin-dependent distribution functions for relativistic hydrodynamics of spin-1/2 particles,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 116017 [1712.07676]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[12]
Thermodynamic versus kinetic approach to polarization-vorticity coupling
W. Florkowski, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Thermodynamic versus kinetic approach to polarization-vorticity coupling,Phys. Rev. C98(2018) 044906 [1806.02616]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[13]
S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Relativistic dissipative spin dynamics in the relaxation time approximation,Phys. Lett. B814(2021) 136096 [2002.03937]
-
[14]
S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar and R. Ryblewski,Dissipative Spin Dynamics in Relativistic Matter,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 014030 [2008.10976]
-
[15]
N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza and D.H. Rischke,Relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics from kinetic theory with a nonlocal collision term,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L091901 [2208.01955]. – 31 –
-
[16]
W. Florkowski and M. Hontarenko,Generalized Thermodynamic Relations for Perfect Spin Hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 082302 [2405.03263]
-
[17]
Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski and M. Hontarenko,Hybrid approach to perfect and dissipative spin hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096018 [2408.03106]
-
[18]
S. Bhadury, Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski, S.K. Kar and V. Mykhaylova,Local equilibrium Wigner function for spin-1/2 particles,2505.02657
-
[19]
Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis
K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo and H. Taya,Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis,Phys. Lett. B795(2019) 100 [1901.06615]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
- [20]
-
[21]
F. Becattini, A. Daher and X.-L. Sheng,Entropy current and entropy production in relativistic spin hydrodynamics,Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138533 [2309.05789]
-
[22]
F. Becattini and R. Singh,On the local thermodynamic relations in relativistic spin hydrodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1338 [2506.20681]
- [23]
-
[24]
A.D. Gallegos and U. Gürsoy,Holographic spin liquids and Lovelock Chern-Simons gravity, JHEP11(2020) 151 [2004.05148]
-
[25]
The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
- [26]
-
[27]
A. Chiarini, J. Sammet and M. Shokri,Semi-Classical Spin Hydrodynamics in Flat and Curved Spacetime: Covariance, Linear Waves, and Bjorken Background,2412.19854
-
[28]
A.D. Gallegos, U. Gürsoy and A. Yarom,Hydrodynamics of spin currents,SciPost Phys.11 (2021) 041 [2101.04759]
-
[29]
M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov and H.-U. Yee,Relativistic spin hydrodynamics with torsion and linear response theory for spin relaxation,JHEP11(2021) 150 [2107.14231]
-
[30]
A.D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy and A. Yarom,Hydrodynamics, spin currents and torsion,JHEP 05(2023) 139 [2203.05044]
-
[31]
Bjorken,Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region,Phys
J.D. Bjorken,Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region,Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 140
work page 1983
-
[32]
Gubser,Symmetry constraints on generalizations of bjorken flow,Phys
S.S. Gubser,Symmetry constraints on generalizations of bjorken flow,Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 085027
work page 2010
-
[33]
Conformal hydrodynamics in Minkowski and de Sitter spacetimes
S.S. Gubser and A. Yarom,Conformal hydrodynamics in Minkowski and de Sitter spacetimes,Nucl. Phys. B846(2011) 469 [1012.1314]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[34]
Spin polarization evolution in a boost invariant hydrodynamical background
W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, R. Ryblewski and R. Singh,Spin polarization evolution in a boost invariant hydrodynamical background,Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 044910 [1901.09655]. – 32 –
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
- [35]
-
[36]
D.-L. Wang, X.-Q. Xie, S. Fang and S. Pu,Analytic solutions of relativistic dissipative spin hydrodynamics with radial expansion in Gubser flow,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 114050 [2112.15535]
-
[37]
A. Bagchi, K.S. Kolekar and A. Shukla,Carrollian Origins of Bjorken Flow,Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) 241601 [2302.03053]
-
[38]
A. Bagchi, K.S. Kolekar, T. Mandal and A. Shukla,Heavy-ion collisions, Gubser flow, and Carroll hydrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 056004 [2310.03167]
-
[39]
J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincaré, inAnnales de l’institut Henri Poincaré. Section A, Physique Théorique, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, 1965
work page 1965
-
[40]
Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim
N.D. Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim. A44(1966) 512
work page 1966
-
[41]
A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, 2506.16164
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[42]
Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162
K. Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162
-
[43]
L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson,Foundations of Carrollian Geometry,2510.21651
-
[44]
Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids
L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A.C. Petkou, P.M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos,Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids,Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 165001 [1802.05286]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[45]
A.C. Petkou, P.M. Petropoulos, D.R. Betancour and K. Siampos,Relativistic fluids, hydrodynamic frames and their Galilean versus Carrollian avatars,JHEP09(2022) 162 [2205.09142]
-
[46]
J. Armas and E. Have,Carrollian Fluids and Spontaneous Breaking of Boost Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 161606 [2308.10594]
-
[47]
L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus and S. Prohazka,Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 205 [2111.03668]
- [48]
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
-
[52]
J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]
-
[53]
K.S. Kolekar, T. Mandal, A. Shukla and P. Soni,Hydrodynamics in the Carrollian Regime, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41(2026) 2650016 [2409.18763]
-
[54]
D. Hansen, N.A. Obers, G. Oling and B.T. Sogaard,Carroll Expansion of General Relativity, SciPost Phys.13(2022) 055 [2112.12684]
-
[55]
A. Jaiswal,Spin-hydrodynamics of electrons in graphene and magnetization due to thermal vorticity,2409.07764. – 33 –
-
[56]
Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions
N. Banerjee, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Jain, S. Minwalla and T. Sharma, Constraints on Fluid Dynamics from Equilibrium Partition Functions,JHEP09(2012) 046 [1203.3544]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[57]
Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current
K. Jensen, M. Kaminski, P. Kovtun, R. Meyer, A. Ritz and A. Yarom,Towards hydrodynamics without an entropy current,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 101601 [1203.3556]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[58]
Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter
P. Kovtun,Thermodynamics of polarized relativistic matter,JHEP07(2016) 028 [1606.01226]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[59]
Kubo formulas for thermodynamic transport coefficients
P. Kovtun and A. Shukla,Kubo formulas for thermodynamic transport coefficients,JHEP10 (2018) 007 [1806.05774]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[60]
Shukla,Equilibrium thermodynamic susceptibilities for a dense degenerate Dirac field, Phys
A. Shukla,Equilibrium thermodynamic susceptibilities for a dense degenerate Dirac field, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 096010 [1906.02334]
-
[61]
P. Kovtun and A. Shukla,Einstein’s equations in matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 104051 [1907.04976]
-
[62]
S.R. De Groot, W.A. Van Leeuwen and C.G. Van Weert,Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications, North-Holland Publishing Company (1980)
work page 1980
-
[63]
Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull
M. Henneaux,Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,Bull. Soc. Math. Belg.31(1979) 47
work page 1979
-
[64]
Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time
C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons, P.A. Horvathy and P.M. Zhang,Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 085016 [1402.0657]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[65]
X. Bekaert and K. Morand,Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective,J. Math. Phys.59(2018) 072503 [1505.03739]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[66]
Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity
J. Hartong,Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,JHEP08(2015) 069 [1505.05011]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[67]
Physical Aspects of the Space-Time Torsion
I.L. Shapiro,Physical aspects of the space-time torsion,Phys. Rept.357(2002) 113 [hep-th/0103093]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
- [68]
-
[69]
A. Banerjee, S. Dutta and S. Mondal,Carroll fermions in two dimensions,Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 125020 [2211.11639]
-
[70]
E.A. Bergshoeff, A. Campoleoni, A. Fontanella, L. Mele and J. Rosseel,Carroll fermions, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 153 [2312.00745]
- [71]
-
[72]
D. Grumiller, L. Mele and L. Montecchio,Carroll spinors,Modern Physics Letters A(2026) 2540003 [2509.19426]
-
[73]
J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll stories,JHEP09 (2023) 148 [2307.06827]
-
[74]
Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff
A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. Rattazzi,Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,JHEP06(2015) 155 [1501.03845]. – 34 –
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.