pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16082 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-22 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Roche limit and stellar disruption in the Simpson--Visser spacetime

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Roche limitSimpson-Visser spacetimetidal forcesblack holeneutron starwhite dwarfaffine modelstellar disruption
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Simpson-Visser regularized metric shifts the Roche limit for tidal disruption of stars near black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates how tidal forces from a Simpson-Visser black bounce act on neutron stars, white dwarfs, and Sun-like stars, comparing the forces to each star's self-gravity to locate the Roche radius where disruption occurs. It does this for both a static observer and a radially infalling observer, finding that the choice of observer changes the measured forces. The work then checks, for black holes the mass of M87* and Sgr A*, whether the disruption point lies inside or outside the event horizon and therefore whether it could be observed. A dynamical affine model is applied to track how the stellar axes stretch and compress during infall under the regularized geometry.

Core claim

In the Simpson-Visser spacetime the tidal forces produce Roche radii that depend on the regularization parameter; for astrophysical black-hole masses these radii place some stellar disruptions outside the event horizon, making them potentially observable, while the affine model shows that the black-hole mass and the regularization together control the time evolution of the three principal axes of the infalling star.

What carries the argument

The Simpson-Visser metric (a regular black-bounce spacetime) together with the geodesic-deviation equation for tidal forces and the affine model for dynamical stellar deformation.

If this is right

  • For the same black-hole mass the Roche radius is smaller than in Schwarzschild spacetime when the regularization parameter is non-zero.
  • Neutron-star disruptions around M87* and Sgr A* occur inside the horizon and are therefore unobservable, while white-dwarf and Sun-like star disruptions can occur outside the horizon.
  • The affine model predicts that the stellar deformation rate increases with black-hole mass and is reduced by the presence of the bounce regularization.
  • Some tidal-disruption events become observable only because the regularized geometry moves the Roche surface outward relative to the horizon.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeated observations of the radial distance at which stars are disrupted could place empirical bounds on the regularization parameter.
  • The same calculation framework can be applied to other regular black-hole metrics to compare their predicted disruption signatures.
  • If the affine-model axis evolution matches future gravitational-wave or electromagnetic data from stellar inspirals, it would support the use of regularized metrics for near-horizon astrophysics.

Load-bearing premise

The Simpson-Visser metric is assumed to be a realistic description of spacetime near real astrophysical black holes.

What would settle it

A measured tidal-disruption distance for a Sun-like star around Sgr A* that lies outside the calculated Roche radius for any allowed regularization parameter would falsify the model's prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16082 by Marcos V. de S. Silva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of the radius at which the angular com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the radius at which the angular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the left panel, we compare the Roche radius of a neutron star for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the left panel, we compare the Roche radius of a white dwarf for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the left panel, we compare the Roche radius of a Sun-like star for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Due to the tidal forces that a black hole can produce, certain types of compact objects may undergo disruption as they approach the black hole. This disruption point is known as the Roche limit (or Roche radius). In this work, we studied the tidal forces arising from the presence of the Simpson--Visser black bounce. We analyzed the tidal forces both for a static observer and for a radially infalling observer and showed that differences arise depending on the choice of observer. We used the tidal forces together with the stellar binding forces to determine the Roche radius for neutron stars, white dwarfs, and Sun-like stars, and to investigate how the Simpson--Visser regularization affects the tidal disruption of these astrophysical objects. We also examined whether, for astrophysical black holes such as M87* and Sgr~A*, these stellar disruption processes occur inside or outside the event horizon, and thus whether they are observable. To provide a more realistic dynamical description, we implement the Affine Model to evaluate the tidal deformation of neutron stars, white dwarfs, and main-sequence stars, assessing how the regularized geometry and the black hole mass govern the evolution of the stellar axes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes tidal forces in the Simpson-Visser regularized black-hole spacetime from the Riemann tensor for both static and radially infalling observers. These forces are set equal to Newtonian stellar binding energies to obtain Roche radii for neutron stars, white dwarfs, and Sun-like stars, and the affine model is employed to track the dynamical evolution of the stellar axes. The work further determines whether the resulting disruption radii lie inside or outside the event horizon for the supermassive black holes M87* and Sgr A*.

Significance. If the hybrid matching procedure is placed on a firmer footing, the calculation supplies a concrete, parameter-dependent prediction for how the Simpson-Visser regularization shifts the Roche limit relative to Schwarzschild, together with an assessment of observability for astrophysical black holes. The explicit comparison of static versus infalling observers and the inclusion of the affine model constitute the main technical contributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Roche-radius calculation): the tidal acceleration extracted from the Riemann tensor is equated directly to a Newtonian estimate of stellar self-gravity. This hybrid construction is inconsistent for neutron stars (and marginally for white dwarfs) once the tidal radius approaches the horizon scale, because the internal structure of the star can no longer be treated as Newtonian when the external curvature radius becomes comparable to the stellar radius.
  2. [§6] §6 (affine-model implementation): the initial conditions and restoring forces in the affine model are taken to be Newtonian, so the same mismatch between the GR tidal tensor and Newtonian binding forces propagates into the dynamical evolution of the stellar axes.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to the spacetime as a 'black bounce' while the title uses 'Simpson--Visser spacetime'; a single consistent terminology should be adopted throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments on the hybrid matching procedure. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions made to strengthen the discussion of approximations and their validity.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Roche-radius calculation): the tidal acceleration extracted from the Riemann tensor is equated directly to a Newtonian estimate of stellar self-gravity. This hybrid construction is inconsistent for neutron stars (and marginally for white dwarfs) once the tidal radius approaches the horizon scale, because the internal structure of the star can no longer be treated as Newtonian when the external curvature radius becomes comparable to the stellar radius.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's identification of this limitation in the hybrid approach. Equating the GR tidal field (from the Riemann tensor) to Newtonian stellar self-gravity is a standard approximation in the tidal-disruption literature, including studies in Schwarzschild and Kerr spacetimes. For neutron stars the approximation is indeed less reliable when the Roche radius approaches the horizon scale, as the stellar interior requires a relativistic treatment. In our calculations for the supermassive black holes M87* and Sgr A*, the neutron-star Roche radii lie inside the event horizon; we have therefore added an explicit paragraph in the revised §4 discussing the range of validity of the matching procedure, the regimes where the Newtonian self-gravity assumption breaks down, and the indicative nature of the results for compact objects. For white dwarfs and Sun-like stars the approximation remains more robust, as their Roche radii are larger relative to the horizon. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§6] §6 (affine-model implementation): the initial conditions and restoring forces in the affine model are taken to be Newtonian, so the same mismatch between the GR tidal tensor and Newtonian binding forces propagates into the dynamical evolution of the stellar axes.

    Authors: We agree that the affine model inherits the hybrid character of the tidal-force calculation. The model is used to evolve the stellar axes under the Simpson-Visser tidal tensor while retaining Newtonian restoring forces, following the conventional implementation in the literature. We have revised §6 to state these approximations explicitly, to note that the dynamical results are subject to the same limitations discussed in §4, and to clarify that a fully relativistic hydrodynamical treatment would be needed for quantitative accuracy near the horizon, especially for neutron stars. The revised text also emphasizes that the affine-model results are intended to illustrate the qualitative dependence on the regularization parameter and black-hole mass rather than to provide precise quantitative predictions for compact objects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained from given metric and standard stellar binding energies

full rationale

The paper computes tidal accelerations directly from the Riemann tensor components of the Simpson-Visser line element for static and radially infalling observers, then sets these equal to Newtonian stellar self-gravity estimates to locate the Roche radius. No parameters are fitted to subsets of data and then relabeled as predictions; the affine model extension uses standard initial conditions without internal fitting loops. No self-citations are load-bearing for the central claim, and the metric itself is taken as an external input. The chain therefore does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Simpson-Visser metric as a regularized black-hole solution and on standard Newtonian stellar binding energies; the regularization parameter is an input from the metric definition.

free parameters (1)
  • regularization parameter
    The bounce scale in the Simpson-Visser line element is a free parameter of the metric that controls the size of the regular core and must be chosen or constrained.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Simpson-Visser metric solves the Einstein equations with a regular core
    The paper takes this metric as given and computes tidal forces within it.
  • domain assumption Stellar binding forces can be compared directly to geodesic deviation tidal forces
    The Roche-limit calculation equates the two without relativistic corrections to the star's internal structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1387 out tokens · 22787 ms · 2026-05-16T11:57:38.650102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    Kazunori Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

  2. [2]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    Kazunori Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

  3. [3]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. EHT and Multiwavelength Observations, Data Pro- cessing, and Calibration,

    Kazunori Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. EHT and Multiwavelength Observations, Data Pro- cessing, and Calibration,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L13 (2022), arXiv:2311.08679 [astro-ph.HE]

  4. [4]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

    Kazunori Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Ar- ray and Instrumentation,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L2 (2019), arXiv:1906.11239 [astro-ph.IM]

  5. [5]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration

    Kazunori Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. III. Data Processing and Calibration,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L3 (2019), arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]

  6. [6]

    Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A$^*$

    Sunny Vagnozziet al., “Horizon-scale tests of gravity the- ories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    Leor Baracket al., “Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    Tests for the existence of horizons through gravitational wave echoes

    Vitor Cardoso and Paolo Pani, “Tests for the existence of black holes through gravitational wave echoes,” Nature Astron.1, 586–591 (2017), arXiv:1709.01525 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    New horizons for fundamen- tal physics with LISA,

    K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), “New horizons for fundamen- tal physics with LISA,” Living Rev. Rel.25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review

    Pedro V. P. Cunha and Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, “Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review,” Gen. Rel. Grav.50, 42 (2018), arXiv:1801.00860 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow,

    Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Alexandre M. Pombo, Eu- gen Radu, Pedro V. P. Cunha, and Nicolas Sanchis- Gual, “The imitation game: Proca stars that can mimic the Schwarzschild shadow,” JCAP04, 051 (2021), arXiv:2102.01703 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    The imitation game reloaded: ef- fective shadows of dynamically robust spinning Proca stars,

    Ivo Sengo, Pedro V. P. Cunha, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, and Eugen Radu, “The imitation game reloaded: ef- fective shadows of dynamically robust spinning Proca stars,” JCAP05, 054 (2024), arXiv:2402.14919 [gr-qc]

  13. [13]

    Can different black holes cast the same shadow?

    Haroldo C. D. Lima, Junior., Lu´ ıs C. B. Crispino, Pedro V. P. Cunha, and Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, “Can different black holes cast the same shadow?” Phys. Rev. D103, 084040 (2021), arXiv:2102.07034 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon?

    Vitor Cardoso, Edgardo Franzin, and Paolo Pani, “Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event hori- zon?” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 171101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 089902 (2016)], arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    Does the black hole shadow probe the event horizon geometry?

    Pedro V. P. Cunha, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, and Maria J. Rodriguez, “Does the black hole shadow probe the event horizon geometry?” Phys. Rev. D97, 084020 (2018), arXiv:1802.02675 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Observational im- prints of gravastars from accretion disks and hot spots,

    Jo˜ ao Lu´ ıs Rosa, Daniela S. J. Cordeiro, Caio F. B. Macedo, and Francisco S. N. Lobo, “Observational im- prints of gravastars from accretion disks and hot spots,” Phys. Rev. D109, 084002 (2024), arXiv:2401.07766 [gr- 10 qc]

  17. [17]

    Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,

    Jo˜ ao Lu´ ıs Rosa, Caio F. B. Macedo, and Diego Rubiera- Garcia, “Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D108, 044021 (2023), arXiv:2303.17296 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    Shadows and optical appearance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accretion disk,

    Merce Guerrero, Gonzalo J. Olmo, Diego Rubiera- Garcia, and Diego S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, “Shadows and optical appearance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accretion disk,” JCAP08, 036 (2021), arXiv:2105.15073 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Light ring im- ages of double photon spheres in black hole and worm- hole spacetimes,

    Merce Guerrero, Gonzalo J. Olmo, Diego Rubiera- Garcia, and Diego G´ omez S´ aez-Chill´ on, “Light ring im- ages of double photon spheres in black hole and worm- hole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D105, 084057 (2022), arXiv:2202.03809 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Spherical black holes with regular center: a review of existing models including a recent realization with Gaussian sources

    Stefano Ansoldi, “Spherical black holes with regular cen- ter: A Review of existing models including a recent real- ization with Gaussian sources,” inConference on Black Holes and Naked Singularities(2008) arXiv:0802.0330 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Regular Magnetic Black Holes and Monopoles from Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    Kirill A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0006014

  22. [22]

    Regular phantom black holes

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phan- tom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 251101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511109

  23. [23]

    Regular black holes sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics,

    Kirill A. Bronnikov, “Regular black holes sourced by non- linear electrodynamics,” (2022), arXiv:2211.00743 [gr- qc]

  24. [24]

    Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes

    Sean A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of reg- ular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0506126

  25. [25]

    Dark matter halo as a source of regular black-hole geometries,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Dark matter halo as a source of regular black-hole geometries,” (2025), arXiv:2511.03066 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    The Bardeen Model as a Nonlinear Magnetic Monopole

    Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493, 149–152 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0009077

  27. [27]

    Bardeen Regular Black Hole With an Electric Source

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, “Bardeen Regular Black Hole With an Electric Source,” JCAP06, 025 (2018), arXiv:1802.05095 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Using Dominant and Weak Energy Conditions for build New Classes of Regular Black Holes

    Manuel E. Rodrigues, Ednaldo L. B. Junior, and Mar- cos V. de Sousa Silva, “Using dominant and weak energy conditions for build new classe of regular black holes,” JCAP02, 059 (2018), arXiv:1705.05744 [physics.gen-ph]

  29. [29]

    Regular Black Hole in General Relativity Coupled to Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, “Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear elec- trodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056–5059 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9911046

  30. [30]

    New Regular Black Hole Solution from Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    Eloy Ayon-Beato and Alberto Garcia, “New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Lett. B464, 25 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9911174

  31. [31]

    Regular electrically charged structures in Nonlinear Electrodynamics coupled to General Relativity

    Irina Dymnikova, “Regular electrically charged struc- tures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.21, 4417–4429 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407072

  32. [32]

    Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source

    Leonardo Balart and Elias C. Vagenas, “Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source,” Phys. Rev. D90, 124045 (2014), arXiv:1408.0306 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Regular black holes in Rainbow Gravity,

    Ednaldo L. B. Junior, Manuel E. Rodrigues, and Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, “Regular black holes in Rainbow Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B961, 115244 (2020), arXiv:2002.04410 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Regular multihorizon black holes in $f(G)$ gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, “Regular multihorizon black holes inf(G) gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D99, 124010 (2019), arXiv:1906.06168 [gr-qc]

  35. [35]

    Bardeen-Kiselev black hole with a cos- mological constant,

    Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de S. Silva, and Hen- rique A. Vieira, “Bardeen-Kiselev black hole with a cos- mological constant,” Phys. Rev. D105, 084043 (2022), arXiv:2203.04965 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Regular multihorizon black holes in General Relativity,

    Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, and Andrew S. de Siqueira, “Regular multihorizon black holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D102, 084038 (2020), arXiv:2010.09490 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Regular black holes in $f(G)$ gravity

    Marcos V. de Sousa Silva and Manuel E. Rodrigues, “Regular black holes inf(G) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 638 (2018), arXiv:1808.05861 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    Geometric wormhole throats

    Matt Visser and David Hochberg, “Generic wormhole throats,” Annals Israel Phys. Soc.13, 249 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9710001

  39. [39]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole

    Alex Simpson and Matt Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,” JCAP02, 042 (2019), arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Charged black-bounce spacetimes,

    Edgardo Franzin, Stefano Liberati, Jacopo Mazza, Alex Simpson, and Matt Visser, “Charged black-bounce spacetimes,” JCAP07, 036 (2021), arXiv:2104.11376 [gr- qc]

  41. [41]

    Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,

    Francisco S. N. Lobo, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de Sousa Silva, Alex Simpson, and Matt Visser, “Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D103, 084052 (2021), arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field,

    Pedro Ca˜ nate, “Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D106, 024031 (2022), arXiv:2202.02303 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes,

    Kirill A. Bronnikov and Rahul Kumar Walia, “Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 044039 (2022), arXiv:2112.13198 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Source of black bounces in general relativity,

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “Source of black bounces in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D107, 044064 (2023), arXiv:2302.10772 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    Black bounce solutions via nonminimal scalar-electrodynamic couplings,

    Daniela S. J. Cordeiro, Ednaldo L. B. Junior, Jos´ e Tar- ciso S. S. Junior, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Jorde A. A. Ramos, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Lu´ ıs F. Dias da Silva, and Henrique A. Vieira, “Black bounce solutions via nonminimal scalar-electrodynamic couplings,” (2025), arXiv:2509.24053 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Generalized models for black-bounce solu- tions in f(R) gravity,

    J´ ulio C. Fabris, Ednaldo L. B. Junior, and Manuel E. Rodrigues, “Generalized models for black-bounce solu- tions in f(R) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, 884 (2023), arXiv:2310.00714 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Com- ment on “Source of black bounces in Rastall gravity

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “Com- ment on “Source of black bounces in Rastall gravity”,” JCAP05, 012 (2024), arXiv:2402.17814 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Generalized black- bounces solutions in f(R) gravity and their field sources,

    Marcos V. de S. Silva, T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, R. R. Landim, and Manuel E. Rodrigues, “Generalized black- bounces solutions in f(R) gravity and their field sources,” Class. Quant. Grav.43, 015005 (2026), arXiv:2502.19186 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Black- bounces with multiple throats and anti-throats,

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “Black- bounces with multiple throats and anti-throats,” Class. Quant. Grav.40, 225011 (2023), arXiv:2204.11851 [gr- qc]. 11

  50. [50]

    Em- bedding regular black holes and black bounces in a cloud of strings,

    Manuel E. Rodrigues and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “Em- bedding regular black holes and black bounces in a cloud of strings,” Phys. Rev. D106, 084016 (2022), arXiv:2210.05383 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources,

    Kirill A. Bronnikov, Manuel E. Rodrigues, and Mar- cos V. de S. Silva, “Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources,” Phys. Rev. D108, 024065 (2023), arXiv:2305.19296 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    On black bounce space-times in non- linear electrodynamics,

    G. Alencar, Kirill A. Bronnikov, Manuel E. Ro- drigues, Diego S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “On black bounce space-times in non- linear electrodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, 745 (2024), arXiv:2403.12897 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Magnetically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear electrodynamics in a k-essence theory,

    Carlos F. S. Pereira, Denis C. Rodrigues, Marcos V. de S. Silva, J´ ulio C. Fabris, Manuel E. Rodrigues, and H. Be- lich, “Magnetically charged black-bounce solution via nonlinear electrodynamics in a k-essence theory,” Phys. Rev. D111, 084025 (2025), arXiv:2409.09182 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    Field sources for f(R,Rµν) black- bounce solutions: The case of K-gravity,

    G. Alencar, M. Nilton, Manuel E. Rodrigues, and Mar- cos V. de S. Silva, “Field sources for f(R,Rµν) black- bounce solutions: The case of K-gravity,” Phys. Dark Univ.49, 102060 (2025), arXiv:2409.12101 [gr-qc]

  55. [55]

    Black-bounce solutions in a k-essence theory under the effects of bumblebee gravity,

    Carlos F. S. Pereira, Marcos V. de S. Silva, H. Belich, Denis C. Rodrigues, J´ ulio C. Fabris, and Manuel E. Ro- drigues, “Black-bounce solutions in a k-essence theory under the effects of bumblebee gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 124005 (2025), arXiv:2503.09920 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    Lqg inspired spacetimes as solu- tions of the Einstein equations,

    Marcos V. de S. Silva, Carlos F. S. Pereira, G. Alencar, and Celio R. Muniz, “Lqg inspired spacetimes as solu- tions of the Einstein equations,” Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 168 (2025), arXiv:2506.19818 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics,

    G. Alencar, Albert Duran-Cabac´ es, Diego Rubiera- Garcia, and Diego S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, “General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D111, 104020 (2025), arXiv:2501.03909 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Static and stationary black bounces inspired by loop quantum gravity,

    C. R. Muniz, G. Alencar, M. S. Cunha, and Gonzalo J. Olmo, “Static and stationary black bounces inspired by loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D112, 024018 (2025), arXiv:2408.08542 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Braneworld Black Bounce to Transversable Worm- hole Analytically Connected to an asymptoticallyAdS 5 Boundary,

    T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, and Milko Estrada, “Braneworld Black Bounce to Transversable Worm- hole Analytically Connected to an asymptoticallyAdS 5 Boundary,” (2024), arXiv:2407.03528 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Braneworld black bounce to transversable wormhole,

    Tiago M. Crispim, Milko Estrada, C. R. Muniz, and G. Alencar, “Braneworld black bounce to transversable wormhole,” JCAP10, 063 (2024), arXiv:2405.08048 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Black String Bounce to Traversable Wormhole,

    Arthur Menezes Lima, Geov´ a Maciel de Alencar Filho, and Job Saraiva Furtado Neto, “Black String Bounce to Traversable Wormhole,” Symmetry15, 150 (2023), arXiv:2211.12349 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Charged black string bounce and its field source,

    A. Lima, G. Alencar, R. N. Costa Filho, and R. R. Landim, “Charged black string bounce and its field source,” Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 108 (2023), arXiv:2306.03029 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Black bounces in Cotton gravity,

    Ednaldo L. B. Junior, Jos´ e Tarciso S. S. Junior, Francisco S. N. Lobo, Manuel E. Rodrigues, Diego Rubiera-Garcia, Lu´ ıs F. Dias da Silva, and Henrique A. Vieira, “Black bounces in Cotton gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1190 (2024), arXiv:2407.21649 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Orbits Around a Black Bounce Spacetime,

    Marcos V. de S. Silva and Manuel E. Rodrigues, “Orbits Around a Black Bounce Spacetime,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63, 101 (2024), arXiv:2404.15792 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    From regular black holes to horizonless objects: quasi- normal modes, instabilities and spectroscopy,

    Edgardo Franzin, Stefano Liberati, and Vania Vellucci, “From regular black holes to horizonless objects: quasi- normal modes, instabilities and spectroscopy,” JCAP01, 020 (2024), arXiv:2310.11990 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    Light deflec- tion and gravitational lensing effects in acoustic black- bounce spacetime,

    C. F. S. Pereira, A. R. Soares, M. V. de S. Silva, R. L. L. Vit´ oria, and H. Belich, “Light deflec- tion and gravitational lensing effects in acoustic black- bounce spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D112, 064012 (2025), arXiv:2505.12577 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    Gravitational lensing in black- bounce spacetimes,

    J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, P. J. Porfirio, and A. R. Soares, “Gravitational lensing in black- bounce spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D102, 044021 (2020), arXiv:2005.13096 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    Light deflection and gravita- tional lensing effects inspired by loop quantum gravity,

    A. R. Soares, C. F. S. Pereira, R. L. L. Vit´ oria, Marcos V. de S. Silva, and H. Belich, “Light deflection and gravita- tional lensing effects inspired by loop quantum gravity,” JCAP06, 034 (2025), arXiv:2503.06373 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    Topologically charged holonomy corrected Schwarzschild black hole lensing,

    A. R. Soares, R. L. L. Vit´ oria, and C. F. S. Pereira, “Topologically charged holonomy corrected Schwarzschild black hole lensing,” Phys. Rev. D110, 084004 (2024), arXiv:2408.03217 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Holonomy corrected Schwarzschild black hole lensing,

    A. R. Soares, C. F. S. Pereira, R. L. L. Vit´ oria, and Erick Melo Rocha, “Holonomy corrected Schwarzschild black hole lensing,” Phys. Rev. D108, 124024 (2023), arXiv:2309.05106 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

    R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), “Detection of the gravita- tional redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole,” Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

  72. [72]

    Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole,

    R. Abuteret al.(GRAVITY), “Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole,” Astron. Astro- phys.636, L5 (2020), arXiv:2004.07187 [astro-ph.GA]

  73. [73]

    The Galactic Center Massive Black Hole and Nuclear Star Cluster

    Reinhard Genzel, Frank Eisenhauer, and Stefan Gillessen, “The Galactic Center Massive Black Hole and Nuclear Star Cluster,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3121–3195 (2010), arXiv:1006.0064 [astro-ph.GA]

  74. [74]

    How black hole activity may influence ex- oplanetary evolution in our Galaxy,

    W. Ishibashi, “How black hole activity may influence ex- oplanetary evolution in our Galaxy,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.533, 455 (2024), arXiv:2410.22428 [astro- ph.GA]

  75. [75]

    M. P. Hobson, G. P. Efstathiou, and A. N. Lasenby,Gen- eral relativity: An introduction for physicists(Cambridge University Press, 2006)

  76. [76]

    Tidal Disruption Events,

    Suvi Gezari, “Tidal Disruption Events,” Ann. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys.59, 21–58 (2021), arXiv:2104.14580 [astro-ph.HE]

  77. [77]

    Tidal disruption of a neutron star near naked singularity,

    Ashok B. Joshi, Pankaj S. Joshi, and Sudip Bhat- tacharyya, “Tidal disruption of a neutron star near naked singularity,” (2025), arXiv:2509.26108 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations

    S. Komossa, “Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations,” JHEAp7, 148–157 (2015), arXiv:1505.01093 [astro-ph.HE]

  79. [79]

    The tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole,

    Charles R. Evans and Christopher S. Kochanek, “The tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole,” As- trophys. J. Lett.346, L13–L16 (1989)

  80. [80]

    Tidal dynamics and stellar disruption in charged Kalb-Ramond black holes in nonlinear electro- dynamics,

    Ednaldo L. B. Junior, Herlan N. Lemos, and Marcos V. de S. Silva, “Tidal dynamics and stellar disruption in charged Kalb-Ramond black holes in nonlinear electro- dynamics,” (2026), arXiv:2601.09482 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.