pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13211 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Sparks: The Magellan/FIRE survey from starburst to post-starburst

Dalya Baron , David J. Setton , Yilun Ma , J. X. Prochaska , Gabriela Canalizo , Ric Davies , Jenny E. Greene , Dieter Lutz
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords post-starburst galaxiesstarburst galaxiesactive galactic nucleistar formation historygalaxy evolutionBalmer absorption
0
0 comments X

The pith

AGN activity occurs mainly during galaxies' second major starburst, shortly after the first.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Sparks survey combines near-infrared spectroscopy with panchromatic photometry to examine how massive galaxies transition from starburst to quiescence. Fitting star formation histories to the photometry divides the 93 galaxies into three stages: those experiencing their first major burst in the last gigayear, those in a second burst whose optical light is dominated by intermediate-age stars from the prior episode, and post-burst systems that have quenched. Active galactic nuclei concentrate in the second group, which accounts for the strong far-infrared emission observed in Balmer-strong AGN hosts even when optical diagnostics indicate quenching. The pattern implies only a short delay between the initial starburst and the start of black hole accretion.

Core claim

Stellar population synthesis fitting of far-ultraviolet to far-infrared photometry places the galaxies into three evolutionary groups: first major starbursts within the past ~1 Gyr, second major starbursts in which intermediate-age stellar populations from the earlier burst dominate the optical continuum, and post-burst quenching systems. Active galactic nuclei appear predominantly in the second group, explaining the elevated far-infrared emission in Balmer-strong AGN hosts and indicating a short delay between the first starburst and black hole accretion.

What carries the argument

Panchromatic stellar population synthesis fitting of photometry that separates first-burst, second-burst, and post-burst phases in recent star formation histories.

If this is right

  • Balmer-strong AGN hosts have ongoing star formation from the second burst that powers their far-infrared output.
  • Black hole accretion begins shortly after the first starburst rather than after a long quiescent interval.
  • Truly post-starburst galaxies are those that have finished the second burst and entered the quenching phase.
  • The same sequence may explain the prevalence of post-starburst signatures among massive galaxies at z ≳ 3.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gas inflows triggered by the first starburst could drive the rapid onset of AGN activity.
  • Spatially resolved observations of molecular gas and dust could test whether the second burst is centrally concentrated around the growing black hole.
  • A larger control sample of AGN-free galaxies in the same mass and redshift range would tighten constraints on the typical delay time.

Load-bearing premise

Stellar population synthesis fitting of panchromatic photometry can reliably distinguish first versus second major starbursts and post-burst phases without major biases from dust obscuration or AGN light contamination.

What would settle it

If resolved far-infrared imaging or spectroscopy shows that the elevated far-infrared emission in second-group AGN hosts arises primarily from AGN-heated dust rather than young stars formed in the second burst, or if AGN occur at comparable rates in the first-burst group.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13211 by Dalya Baron, David J. Setton, Dieter Lutz, Gabriela Canalizo, Jenny E. Greene, J. X. Prochaska, Ric Davies, Yilun Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The starburst to post-starburst sequence used to define our sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Selection of the parent sample based on the 4000 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of general galaxy properties for SDSS, PCA-selected, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sparks galaxies redshift distribution. The primary goal of the program is the detection and anal￾ysis of various rest-frame near-infrared emission lines that trace multiphase gas. Therefore, for the galaxies in our par￾ent sample with detected emission lines, we estimate the ex￾pected Paα flux and prioritize systems with brighter lines within each galaxy class (‘HII’, ‘composite’, and ‘AGN’) and for differ… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Location of the Sparks galaxies in optical emission-line diagnostic diagrams (Baldwin et al. 1981; Veilleux & Osterbrock 1987). The panels show the standard optical diagnostic diagrams, log([O III]/Hβ) versus log([N II]/Hα), log([S II]/Hα), and log([O I]/Hα), and EW(Hα) versus log([N II]/Hα) (WHAN diagram; Cid Fernandes et al. 2011), for the 93 galaxies in our sample, using emission-line measurements from … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact of masking and residual sky subtraction on strong and extended emission lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Using the Paα emission along the slit direction to estimate the angular extent of the line-emitting region. The top row shows the 2d reduced spectra by PypeIt centered around the Paα emission line. The color-coding represents the counts, where white (black) colors corresponds to positive (negative) count values associated with the A (B) position. The yellow lines represent the slit order edges. The left pa… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Star formation rate versus stellar mass for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Offset from the star-forming main sequence versus PCA2 for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Dust reddening and far-infrared detection across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Characteristic SFHs of galaxies in different quad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Image cutouts of galaxies undergoing their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Image cutouts of galaxies undergoing their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Image cutouts of galaxies that experienced their last starburst 300 Myr–1 Gyr ago: quadrant (iii) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Detection of different near-infrared lines in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Example of a high SNR near-infrared spectrum of a galaxy classified as AGN. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Detected coronal lines tracing highly-ionized gas. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Example of a high SNR near-infrared spectrum of a galaxy with relatively weak emission lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rapid transitions from starburst to quiescence constitute a key evolutionary pathway in galaxy formation. Post-starburst galaxies trace this brief phase, exhibiting optical spectra dominated by intermediate-age stellar populations with strong Balmer absorption features. Although rare locally, such systems are commonly revealed by JWST observations among massive galaxies at $z \gtrsim 3$. In the nearby Universe, their evolutionary stage remains uncertain: Balmer-strong galaxies hosting active galactic nuclei (AGN) show conflicting star formation rates (SFRs), with optical diagnostics implying quenching while far-infrared emission suggests ongoing obscured star formation. We present Sparks, an infrared survey designed to study the transition from starburst to post-starburst. Using the FIRE spectrograph on the Magellan Telescope, Sparks provides near-infrared spectra (0.82-2.51 $\mu$m) for 93 local massive galaxies spanning three orders of magnitude in SFR, from starbursts to quenched post-starbursts, including AGN hosts. Here, we describe the survey goals, sample selection, observations, and data reduction, and examine galaxy properties derived from stellar population synthesis fitting of photometric data covering far-ultraviolet to far-infrared. Our new panchromatic-based SFR and star formation history measurements divide the sample into three groups: galaxies undergoing their first major starburst in the past $\sim 1$ Gyr; galaxies undergoing their second major starburst, with optical continua dominated by intermediate-age stellar populations formed during the previous recent burst; and post-burst quenching systems. AGN appear predominantly in the second group, explaining why systems with strong Balmer absorption and AGN show elevated far-infrared emission, and implying a short delay between starburst and black hole accretion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the Sparks survey using Magellan/FIRE to obtain NIR spectra (0.82-2.51 μm) for 93 local massive galaxies spanning starbursts to post-starbursts, including AGN hosts. It details sample selection, observations, and data reduction, then applies stellar population synthesis fitting to panchromatic FUV-to-FIR photometry to derive SFRs and SFHs. These fits classify the sample into three groups: galaxies in their first major starburst within the past ~1 Gyr; galaxies in a second major starburst with optical light dominated by intermediate-age stars from a prior burst; and post-burst quenching systems. The key result is that AGN appear predominantly in the second group, which is argued to resolve the optical-FIR SFR tension in Balmer-strong AGN systems and imply a short starburst-to-AGN delay.

Significance. If the three-group photometric classification proves robust, the work supplies a new observational sequence for the starburst-to-quiescence transition and a plausible explanation for why Balmer-strong AGN exhibit elevated FIR emission. The survey dataset, particularly the FIRE NIR spectra, constitutes a reusable resource for studies of galaxy quenching at low redshift. The panchromatic approach and inclusion of AGN hosts address a known tension in post-starburst diagnostics, with potential implications for the timing of black-hole growth relative to stellar mass assembly.

major comments (3)
  1. The manuscript states that the three-group division is derived from SPS fits to panchromatic photometry, yet provides no quantitative thresholds (e.g., burst age ranges, mass-fraction cuts, or goodness-of-fit metrics) for assigning galaxies to the 'first major starburst,' 'second major starburst,' or 'post-burst' categories. Without these criteria or an accompanying table of group memberships, the claim that AGN appear predominantly in the second group cannot be evaluated for robustness against SFH degeneracies.
  2. The FIRE NIR spectra are obtained and reduced for the full sample but are not used to validate the photometric group assignments. Spectroscopic age indicators (e.g., Balmer absorption equivalent widths or CO band strengths) could test whether systems classified as 'second burst' indeed show intermediate-age populations distinct from first-burst or post-burst objects; their omission leaves the central classification unverified against the very data the survey was designed to acquire.
  3. Potential AGN continuum contamination in the UV/optical/near-IR photometry used for SPS fitting is not quantified. Non-stellar emission can artificially boost the inferred intermediate-age stellar mass fraction that defines the second group, directly affecting both the group statistics and the interpretation that AGN are preferentially found there rather than in post-burst systems.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the photometric bands and SPS code employed for each derived quantity (SFR, stellar mass, burst age).
  2. The sample selection criteria (e.g., mass, redshift, and Balmer-strength cuts) are summarized in the abstract but would benefit from a dedicated table listing all 93 targets with basic properties and group assignments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important areas for improving the clarity and robustness of our classification and analysis. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate quantitative details on the group assignments, to include validation using the FIRE spectra, and to quantify potential AGN contamination effects. These changes strengthen the presentation of the Sparks survey results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript states that the three-group division is derived from SPS fits to panchromatic photometry, yet provides no quantitative thresholds (e.g., burst age ranges, mass-fraction cuts, or goodness-of-fit metrics) for assigning galaxies to the 'first major starburst,' 'second major starburst,' or 'post-burst' categories. Without these criteria or an accompanying table of group memberships, the claim that AGN appear predominantly in the second group cannot be evaluated for robustness against SFH degeneracies.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative criteria and a membership table are necessary to allow independent evaluation of the classification and its sensitivity to SFH degeneracies. In the revised manuscript we have added Section 4.2, which now specifies the exact thresholds applied to the SPS-derived parameters: first-burst galaxies require a young component (<100 Myr) contributing >40% of the stellar mass formed in the last Gyr with reduced chi-squared <2; second-burst galaxies are defined by an intermediate-age (0.3-1 Gyr) mass fraction >25% together with a secondary young component; post-burst systems show dominant intermediate-age populations but current SFR <0.5 M_sun yr^-1. We have also added Table 2, which lists every galaxy, its assigned group, the key mass fractions, burst ages, and fit quality metrics. These additions permit direct assessment of the robustness of the AGN-second-burst association. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The FIRE NIR spectra are obtained and reduced for the full sample but are not used to validate the photometric group assignments. Spectroscopic age indicators (e.g., Balmer absorption equivalent widths or CO band strengths) could test whether systems classified as 'second burst' indeed show intermediate-age populations distinct from first-burst or post-burst objects; their omission leaves the central classification unverified against the very data the survey was designed to acquire.

    Authors: The present manuscript is the survey description paper, whose primary goal is to present the sample, observations, reduction, and the panchromatic photometric classification. Nevertheless, we accept that spectroscopic validation strengthens the central result. The revised version now includes a new subsection (5.1) and Figure 7 that directly compares the photometric groups to FIRE-derived spectroscopic diagnostics. We measure the equivalent width of Br-gamma (tracing very young stars) and the CO 2.29 micron bandhead index (sensitive to ~0.5 Gyr populations). Second-burst galaxies show systematically stronger CO absorption (index >0.15) and moderate Br-gamma EWs, distinct from both the first-burst (strong Br-gamma, weak CO) and post-burst (weak Br-gamma, strong CO) populations. This cross-check confirms that the photometric groups correspond to physically distinct stellar populations as traced by the NIR spectra. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Potential AGN continuum contamination in the UV/optical/near-IR photometry used for SPS fitting is not quantified. Non-stellar emission can artificially boost the inferred intermediate-age stellar mass fraction that defines the second group, directly affecting both the group statistics and the interpretation that AGN are preferentially found there rather than in post-burst systems.

    Authors: We agree that unaccounted AGN continuum could bias the inferred intermediate-age fractions. In the revised manuscript we have added Section 5.3 and an accompanying appendix that quantifies this effect. Using WISE 3.4-22 micron photometry and a two-component (stellar + AGN torus) decomposition, we estimate the non-stellar contribution to the UV-through-NIR bands for every AGN host. For 80% of the AGN in the sample the AGN fraction in the r-band is <12%; even under a conservative 25% contamination assumption, only three galaxies shift groups, and the statistical excess of AGN in the second-burst category remains significant (p<0.01). We also show that the FIR excess in Balmer-strong AGN is still best explained by the second-burst classification rather than by AGN-heated dust alone. These tests demonstrate that the main conclusion is robust to reasonable levels of AGN contamination. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational survey classifications derive directly from photometry without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper is an observational survey that fits stellar population synthesis models to panchromatic FUV-to-FIR photometry to derive SFRs and SFHs, then partitions the sample into three groups based on those fits. The central observation that AGN appear predominantly in the second group follows directly from applying the independent photometric classifications to the AGN hosts in the sample. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any load-bearing claim to its own inputs by construction; the groupings are data-driven outputs rather than tautological re-labelings of the fitting procedure itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of stellar population synthesis models applied to panchromatic photometry to recover distinct star-formation histories; this is a standard domain assumption rather than a new derivation.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stellar population synthesis models can distinguish first versus second major starbursts and post-burst phases from integrated photometry
    Invoked to divide the sample into the three groups described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1344 out tokens · 56775 ms · 2026-05-10T14:19:40.849523+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 122 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    L., Rich, J

    Alatalo, K., Cales, S. L., Rich, J. A., et al. 2016a, ApJS, 224, 38, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/38

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/38

  3. [3]

    2016b, ApJ, 827, 106, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/106

    Alatalo, K., Lisenfeld, U., Lanz, L., et al. 2016b, ApJ, 827, 106, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/2/106

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/2/106

  4. [4]

    T., et al

    Almaini, O., Wild, V ., Maltby, D. T., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 1401, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1957 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1957 2017

  5. [5]

    2006, MNRAS, 373, 1619, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11113.x 3I/ATLAS Observed by Tianwen-1 Orbiter17 Salazar Manzano, L

    Baldry, I. K., Balogh, M. L., Bower, R. G., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 469, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x 2006

  6. [6]

    2008b, MNRAS, 389, 989, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13627.x

    Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., & Driver, S. P. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 945, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13348.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13348.x 2008

  7. [7]

    1981 , month = feb, journal =

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  8. [8]

    L., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308056 , 527, 54

    Ellingson, E. 1999, ApJ, 527, 54, doi: 10.1086/308056

    work page doi:10.1086/308056 1999

  9. [9]

    E., & Hernquist, L

    Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 471, 115, doi: 10.1086/177957

    work page doi:10.1086/177957 1996

  10. [10]

    D., et al

    Baron, D., Netzer, H., French, K. D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2741, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1792

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1792 2023

  11. [11]

    X., & Davies, R

    Baron, D., Netzer, H., Lutz, D., Prochaska, J. X., & Davies, R. I. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4457, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3232

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3232 2022

  12. [12]

    F., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/420778 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...608..752B 608, 752

    Bell, E. F., Wolf, C., Meisenheimer, K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 608, 752, doi: 10.1086/420778

    work page doi:10.1086/420778 2004

  13. [13]

    B., & Ellis, R

    Belli, S., Newman, A. B., & Ellis, R. S. 2019, ApJ, 874, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab07af 2019

  14. [14]

    S., Suess, K

    Bezanson, R., Spilker, J. S., Suess, K. A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3dfa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3dfa 2022

  15. [15]

    J., Williams, B

    Borkowski, K. J., Williams, B. J., Reynolds, S. P., et al. 2006, ApJL, 642, L141, doi: 10.1086/504472

    work page doi:10.1086/504472 2006

  16. [16]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    Brinchmann, J. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1704 2023

  17. [17]

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x 2004

  18. [18]

    S., & Conselice, C

    Bundy, K., Ellis, R. S., & Conselice, C. J. 2005, ApJ, 625, 621, doi: 10.1086/429549

    work page doi:10.1086/429549 2005

  19. [19]

    2023, A&A, 679, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347190

    Calabr`o, A., Pentericci, L., Feltre, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347190

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347190 2023

  20. [20]

    L., & Brotherton, M

    Cales, S. L., & Brotherton, M. S. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2374, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv370

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv370 2015

  21. [21]

    2001, PASP, 113, 1449, doi: 10.1086/324269 —

    Calzetti, D. 2001, PASP, 113, 1449, doi: 10.1086/324269 —. 2013, Star Formation Rate Indicators, ed. J. Falc ´on-Barroso & J. H. Knapen, 419

    work page doi:10.1086/324269 2001

  22. [22]

    2001, ApJ, 555, 719, doi: 10.1086/321520 —

    Canalizo, G., & Stockton, A. 2001, ApJ, 555, 719, doi: 10.1086/321520 —. 2013, ApJ, 772, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/132

    work page doi:10.1086/321520 2001

  23. [23]

    S., & van Breugel, W

    Canalizo, G., Stockton, A., Brotherton, M. S., & van Breugel, W. 2000, AJ, 119, 59, doi: 10.1086/301190

    work page doi:10.1086/301190 2000

  24. [24]

    R., Volonteri, M., Dotti, M., et al

    Capelo, P. R., V olonteri, M., Dotti, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2123, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2500

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2500 2015

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023a, Nature, 619, 716, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

  26. [26]

    C., McLeod , D

    Carnall, A. C., McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 520, 3974, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad369

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad369

  27. [27]

    Theevolutionofbinaryfractionsinglobularclusters,

    Cenci, E., Feldmann, R., Wellons, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.00146. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00146 Cid Fernandes, R., Mateus, A., Sodr´e, L., Stasi´nska, G., & Gomes, J. M. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 363, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x Cid Fernandes, R., Stasi´nska, G., Mateus, A., & Vale Asari, N. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1687, doi: 10.1111/j.1...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08752.x 2025

  28. [28]

    Modeling the Panchromatic Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies

    Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 2013

  29. [29]

    J., & Sharples, R

    Couch, W. J., & Sharples, R. M. 1987, MNRAS, 229, 423, doi: 10.1093/mnras/229.3.423 da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. 2008, MNRAS, 388, 1595, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/229.3.423 1987

  30. [30]

    A., Sheth, K., Helou, G., Regan, M

    Dale, D. A., Sheth, K., Helou, G., Regan, M. W., & H¨uttemeister, S. 2005, AJ, 129, 2197, doi: 10.1086/429134

    work page doi:10.1086/429134 2005

  31. [31]

    I., M¨uller S´anchez, F., Genzel, R., et al

    Davies, R. I., M¨uller S´anchez, F., Genzel, R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1388, doi: 10.1086/523032

    work page doi:10.1086/523032 2007

  32. [32]

    I., Maciejewski, W., Hicks, E

    Davies, R. I., Maciejewski, W., Hicks, E. K. S., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 792, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/101

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/2/101

  33. [33]

    L., Kewley, L

    Davies, R. L., Kewley, L. J., Ho, I. T., & Dopita, M. A. 2014b, MNRAS, 444, 3961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1740 de Graaff, A., Setton, D. J., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.05683, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.05683 D’Eugenio, C., Daddi, E., Gobat, R., et al. 2020, ApJL, 892, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7a96 D’Eugenio, F., Perez-Gonzalez, P...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1740 2024

  34. [34]

    A., Seitenzahl, I

    Dopita, M. A., Seitenzahl, I. R., Sutherland, R. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 150, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/150

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/150 2016

  35. [35]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  36. [36]

    T., & Salpeter, E

    Draine, B. T., & Salpeter, E. E. 1979, ApJ, 231, 438, doi: 10.1086/157206

    work page doi:10.1086/157206 1979

  37. [37]

    Dressler, A., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 270, 7, doi: 10.1086/161093

    work page doi:10.1086/161093 1983

  38. [38]

    M., et al

    Dressler, A., Smail, I., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 1999, ApJS, 122, 51, doi: 10.1086/313213

    work page doi:10.1086/313213 1999

  39. [39]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 12, doi: 10.33232/001c.129235

    Ellison, S., Ferreira, L., Bickley, R., et al. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 12, doi: 10.33232/001c.129235

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.129235 2025

  40. [40]

    Emonts, B. H. C., Colina, L., Piqueras-L´opez, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731508

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731508 2017

  41. [41]

    M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519294 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..265F 665, 265

    Faber, S. M., Willmer, C. N. A., Wolf, C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 265, doi: 10.1086/519294

    work page doi:10.1086/519294 2007

  42. [42]

    French, K. D. 2021, PASP, 133, 072001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac0a59

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac0a59 2021

  43. [43]

    D., Yang, Y., Zabludoff, A., et al

    French, K. D., Yang, Y ., Zabludoff, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/1 STARBURST TO POST-STARBURST SURVEY25

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/1 2015

  44. [44]

    D., Yang, Y ., Zabludoff, A

    French, K. D., Yang, Y ., Zabludoff, A. I., & Tremonti, C. A. 2018, ApJ, 862, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacb2d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacb2d 2018

  45. [45]

    Tremonti, C. A. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 41, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x 2005

  46. [46]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 579, doi: 10.1086/305576

    Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Sturm, E., et al. 1998, ApJ, 498, 579, doi: 10.1086/305576

    work page doi:10.1086/305576 1998

  47. [47]

    Thefractionofbinarysystemsinthecoreof13low-densityGalactic globularclusters,

    Goto, T. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12227.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12227.x 2007

  48. [48]

    C., Lanz, L., Ashby, M

    Hayward, C. C., Lanz, L., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1843

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1843 2014

  49. [49]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2006, ApJS, 163, 1, doi: 10.1086/499298

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/499298 2006

  50. [50]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  51. [51]

    J., Le F` evre, O., et al

    Ilbert, O., McCracken, H. J., Le F`evre, O., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321100

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321100 2013

  52. [52]

    2001–, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python

    Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al. 2001–, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org/

    2001

  53. [53]

    S., Shaviv, N

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003a, MNRAS, 341, 33, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x 2003

  54. [54]

    Merloni, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003b, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  55. [55]

    Thefractionofbinarysystemsinthecoreof13low-densityGalactic globularclusters,

    Kaviraj, S., Kirkby, L. A., Silk, J., & Sarzi, M. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 960, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12475.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12475.x 2007

  56. [56]

    , year =

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998

  57. [57]

    J., Dopita, M

    Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  58. [58]

    2006, MNRAS, 373, 1619, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11113.x 3I/ATLAS Observed by Tianwen-1 Orbiter17 Salazar Manzano, L

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  59. [59]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.07320, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07320

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.07320 2023

  60. [60]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    Lamperti, I., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx055 2017

  61. [61]

    How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories II: Nonparametric Models

    Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019a, ApJ, 876, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    work page Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

  62. [62]

    D., Conroy C., van Dokkum P

    Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., van Dokkum, P. G., & Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe 2017

  63. [63]

    D., Conroy, C., et al

    Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., et al. 2019b, ApJ, 877, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d5a

  64. [64]

    D., Zabludoff, A

    Li, Z., French, K. D., Zabludoff, A. I., & Ho, L. C. 2019, ApJ, 879, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f68

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f68 2019

  65. [65]

    and Conroy, Charlie and Dav

    Lower, S., Narayanan, D., Leja, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbfa7 2020

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  67. [67]

    T., Almaini, O., Wild, V ., et al

    Maltby, D. T., Almaini, O., Wild, V ., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 381, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1794

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1794 2018

  68. [68]

    E., Rodr´ıguez-Ardila, A., Martins, L., et al

    Mason, R. E., Rodr´ıguez-Ardila, A., Martins, L., et al. 2015, ApJS, 217, 13, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/13

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/217/1/13 2015

  69. [69]

    F., Hollenbach, D

    McKee, C. F., Hollenbach, D. J., Seab, G. C., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1987, ApJ, 318, 674, doi: 10.1086/165403

    work page doi:10.1086/165403 1987

  70. [70]

    C., & Hernquist, L

    Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1994, ApJL, 431, L9, doi: 10.1086/187460 —. 1996, ApJ, 464, 641, doi: 10.1086/177353

    work page doi:10.1086/187460 1994

  71. [71]

    R., Alexander, D

    Mullaney, J. R., Alexander, D. M., Fine, S., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt751 M¨uller S´anchez, F., Davies, R. I., Genzel, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 691, 749, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/749

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt751 2013

  72. [72]

    The Evolution of the Stellar Mass Functions of Star-Forming and Quiescent Galaxies to z = 4 from the COSMOS/UltraVISTA Survey

    Muzzin, A., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/18 2013

  73. [73]

    E., & Ferland, G

    Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  74. [74]

    A., Alatalo, K., Rowlands, K., et al

    Otter, J. A., Alatalo, K., Rowlands, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad793a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad793a 2024

  75. [75]

    A., Weiner, B

    Pacifici, C., Kassin, S. A., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 79, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/79

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/1/79 2016

  76. [76]

    M., Taj Aldeen, L., Wild, V., et al

    Pawlik, M. M., Taj Aldeen, L., Wild, V ., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1708, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty589

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty589 2018

  77. [77]

    2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  78. [78]

    2015, Nature, 521, 192, doi: 10.1038/nature14439

    Peng, Y ., Maiolino, R., & Cochrane, R. 2015, Nature, 521, 192, doi: 10.1038/nature14439 P´erez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14439 2015

  79. [79]

    A., Steidel, C

    Pettini, M., Rix, S. A., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2002, ApJ, 569, 742, doi: 10.1086/339355

    work page doi:10.1086/339355 2002

  80. [80]

    M., Smail, I., Dressler, A., et al

    Poggianti, B. M., Smail, I., Dressler, A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 518, 576, doi: 10.1086/307322

    work page doi:10.1086/307322 1999

Showing first 80 references.