pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10160 · v1 · pith:ZHGM3ZYHnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Aether-SHELLQs: JWST integral-field spectroscopy of candidate obscured quasars at z ~ 6

Yoshiki Matsuoka , Roberto Decarli , Emanuele Paolo Farina , Anniek J. Gloudemans , Eduardo Ba\~nados , Fabrizio Arrigoni Battaia , Anna-Christina Eilers , Chiara Mazzucchelli
show 7 more authors
Michael A. Strauss Hyewon Suh Maxime Trebitsch Fabian Walter Feige Wang Kentaro Aoki Junya Arita
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshift galaxiesobscured quasarsLyα emissionBalmer linesAGN fractionSHELLQsJWST NIRSpecz~6
0
0 comments X

The pith

The presence of broad Balmer lines in z~6 SHELLQs candidates correlates strongly with Lyα luminosity, implying AGN fractions above 77% for L_Lyα greater than 10^44 erg s^{-1} and below 15% for lower values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines JWST NIRSpec IFU data on six z~6 galaxies selected as candidate obscured quasars on the basis of luminous but narrow Lyα emission. Two of the targets show broad components in Balmer lines with FWHM exceeding 3000 km/s, while the other four exhibit similar profiles in permitted and forbidden lines. When these results are combined with earlier SHELLQs observations, the presence of broad lines tracks Lyα luminosity closely enough to produce the reported split in AGN fraction. The observations also map compact structures around the broad-line objects and extended ionized gas with high star-formation rates around the others. This work places the targets in the luminosity range that may connect classical high-redshift quasars with the fainter AGN populations now being found by JWST.

Core claim

JWST NIRSpec IFU observations of six z~6 SHELLQs candidates show that two objects display broad Balmer lines with FWHM greater than 3000 km s^{-1}, indicating AGNs, while the remaining four have comparable permitted and forbidden line profiles. Combined with previously reported similar objects, the presence of broad lines correlates strongly with Lyα luminosity, producing inferred AGN fractions above 77 percent for L_Lyα greater than 10^44 erg s^{-1} and below 15 percent below that threshold. Dust-extinction corrections from the Balmer decrement would require unrealistically high Lyα luminosities, pointing to multiple zones in the line-emitting gas. The IFU maps reveal compact AGN hosts and

What carries the argument

The correlation between detection of a broad Balmer-line component (FWHM > 3000 km s^{-1}) and Lyα luminosity, used to classify objects as AGNs or non-AGNs and to derive the luminosity-dependent AGN fraction.

If this is right

  • Dust corrections inferred from the Balmer decrement would produce unrealistically high Lyα luminosities, indicating that the line-emitting gas consists of multiple zones.
  • AGN hosts appear compact while the non-AGN galaxies display extended ionized gas on scales up to 10 kpc and star-formation rates of 60-600 solar masses per year.
  • These objects occupy the intermediate luminosity range between classical luminous quasars and the low-luminosity AGNs, including Little Red Dots, found by JWST.
  • One extended galaxy shows a rotation signature while most others exhibit little ordered kinematics with velocity widths of 200-300 km s^{-1}.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sharp change in AGN fraction near 10^44 erg s^{-1} may mark a minimum luminosity or black-hole mass required to sustain a broad-line region at these redshifts.
  • Mapping the spatial distribution of ionized gas in a larger sample could test whether the extended structures around non-AGN candidates are powered solely by star formation or contain hidden nuclei.
  • Kinematic data from future IFU observations could distinguish whether the lack of ordered motion in most objects reflects mergers or turbulent disks during early galaxy assembly.
  • The placement of these sources between luminous quasars and fainter JWST AGNs suggests a continuous sequence whose luminosity function can be tested with wider surveys.

Load-bearing premise

A broad component in Balmer lines with FWHM exceeding 3000 km s^{-1} indicates an AGN while the absence of such a component means the object is not an AGN.

What would settle it

Additional spectroscopy of SHELLQs candidates with L_Lyα below 10^44 erg s^{-1} that finds a large fraction showing broad Balmer lines, or of candidates above the threshold that finds mostly narrow lines, would directly test the reported correlation and fractions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10160 by Anna-Christina Eilers, Anniek J. Gloudemans, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Eduardo Ba\~nados, Emanuele Paolo Farina, Fabian Walter, Fabrizio Arrigoni Battaia, Feige Wang, Hyewon Suh, Junya Arita, Kentaro Aoki, Maxime Trebitsch, Michael A. Strauss, Roberto Decarli, Yoshiki Matsuoka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Nuclear spectra extracted from the IFU data cubes for each object (red lines). The flux density is given in the observer’s frame, while the wavelength is given in the rest frame for the purpose of presentation, using the systemic redshifts determined from the spectral models. The insets with the green lines show the same spectra plotted on an expanded scale, to make fainter emission features apparent. The … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The best-fit spectral models (red lines) compared with the observed spectra (open circles) around Hβ + [O III] λ4959, 5007 (left panels) and around Hα + [N II] λ6585, 6550 (right panels). The models include a power-law and Fe II continuum (black dashed lines) and emission lines, each modeled as the sum of two or three Gaussian components (green, blue, and orange lines). The dotted lines indicate the expect… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of the emission line fluxes in the nuclear spectra between the FS and IFU measurements. The diamonds, squares, and circles represent G03, G04, and G08, respectively, which were observed in the both modes. Col￾ors indicate [O III] λ5007 (green), the NL/BL components of Hβ (light blue/blue), and the NL/BL components of Hα (orange/red). The dashed line indicates the one-to-one rela￾tion. nosities o… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of Hα luminosities in the NL (panel a) and BL (panel b) components with Lyα luminosities measured for the SHELLQs objects. Thirteen objects from Matsuoka et al. (2025b) and three additional objects from the present analysis are shown. Galaxies with broad Balmer lines are indicated by red diamonds, those without by red crosses, and two quasars with similar Lyα profiles by gray diamonds. The downw… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rest-UV continuum magnitudes and Lyα lumi￾nosities of all SHELLQs quasars (gray dots) and galaxies (red dots; those without Lyα detection are represented by red tri￾angles, plotted at an arbitrary vertical position). The dotted lines represent constant rest-frame EWs of 1, 10, 100, and 1000 ˚A. Sources to the left and bottom of the dashed lines are fainter than the SHELLQs limiting magnitude (zAB = 24.0) a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: NIRSpec IFU maps for the six galaxies. Colors represent peak-normalized flux on a linear scale, increasing from blue to red (color bar is shown in the bottom left panel). Each row corresponds to one galaxy (G03, G04, G08, G12, G13, and G14 from top to bottom), and the panels from left to right show the continuum emission integrated over λrest = 4200 − 5500 ˚A, the [O III] λ5007 line, and the Hα line, respe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: NIRSpec IFU maps for the six galaxies. Each row corresponds to one galaxy (G03, G04, G08, G12, G13, and G14 from top to bottom), and the panels from left to right show the maps of integrated flux (equivalent to the middle-column panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) NIRSpec integral field unit (IFU) observations of six galaxies at $z \sim 6$, obtained as part of the Aether project (General Observers program 5645). The targets were originally identified by the Subaru High-$z$ Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs) survey, as candidate obscured quasars with luminous ($\gtrsim10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$) but narrow ($\lesssim500$ km s$^{-1}$) Ly$\alpha$ emission. Two objects exhibit a broad component in their Balmer lines (FWHM $>3000$ km s$^{-1}$), indicating the presence of active galactic nuclei (AGNs), while the remaining four show similar profiles in permitted and forbidden lines. Combining these data with similar SHELLQs objects reported previously, we find that the presence of broad lines is strongly correlated with Ly$\alpha$ luminosity ($L_{\rm Ly\alpha}$); the inferred AGN fraction is $>$77 % and $<$15 % above and below $L_{\rm Ly\alpha} =10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$, respectively. Dust-extinction corrections inferred from the Balmer decrement would imply unrealistically high Ly$\alpha$ luminosities, suggesting that the line-emitting gas consists of multiple zones. The IFU data reveal diverse spatial structures. The AGN hosts are compact, whereas the other galaxies show extended ionized gas on scales up to 10 kpc and star formation rates of 60 - 600 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. One of the extended objects exhibits a signature of rotation, while most of the others show little ordered kinematics, with velocity widths (FWHM) up to 200 - 300 km s$^{-1}$. These objects populate the intermediate luminosity regime between classical luminous quasars and the low-luminosity AGNs discovered by JWST, including Little Red Dots, potentially linking the two populations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents JWST NIRSpec IFU spectroscopy of six z ≈ 6 galaxies selected as candidate obscured quasars from the SHELLQs survey based on luminous narrow Lyα emission. Two targets show broad Balmer lines with FWHM > 3000 km s⁻¹, interpreted as AGNs, while the other four exhibit similar profiles in permitted and forbidden lines. When combined with previously reported SHELLQs objects, the presence of broad lines correlates strongly with Lyα luminosity, yielding AGN fractions of >77% above and <15% below L_Lyα = 10^44 erg s⁻¹. Additional findings include evidence for multiple emission zones from Balmer decrement analysis, diverse spatial structures with compact AGN hosts versus extended ionized gas in non-AGN candidates, and high star formation rates in the latter.

Significance. If the AGN classification and resulting luminosity-dependent fractions are robust, the work provides important constraints on the demographics of AGNs at z ~ 6, potentially linking classical quasars to the population of low-luminosity AGNs and Little Red Dots discovered by JWST. The IFU data on spatial and kinematic properties of the hosts add value beyond the classification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and central claims] The reported AGN fractions (>77% and <15% above/below L_Lyα = 10^44 erg s⁻¹) and the claimed strong correlation depend on a binary classification of objects as AGN or non-AGN based solely on the detection of a broad Balmer component (FWHM > 3000 km s⁻¹). The manuscript does not supply the formal detection significances for the broad components in the two objects, quantitative upper limits on broad components in the four others, or tests ruling out alternative origins for broad permitted lines such as merger-driven kinematics or outflows in high-SFR systems at z ~ 6.
  2. [Abstract] No information is provided on sample completeness, the total number of objects in the combined SHELLQs sample, statistical tests for the correlation, or error budgets on the fractions, making it difficult to assess the robustness of the luminosity threshold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that dust-extinction corrections would imply unrealistically high Lyα luminosities but does not quantify the Balmer decrement values or the resulting implied luminosities.
  2. [Abstract] The velocity widths of 200-300 km s⁻¹ for the extended objects are given without specifying whether these are FWHM or velocity dispersion, and without comparison to the instrumental resolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight areas where additional quantitative details and discussion will strengthen the presentation of our AGN classification and luminosity-dependent fractions. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested information where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and central claims] The reported AGN fractions (>77% and <15% above/below L_Lyα = 10^44 erg s⁻¹) and the claimed strong correlation depend on a binary classification of objects as AGN or non-AGN based solely on the detection of a broad Balmer component (FWHM > 3000 km s⁻¹). The manuscript does not supply the formal detection significances for the broad components in the two objects, quantitative upper limits on broad components in the four others, or tests ruling out alternative origins for broad permitted lines such as merger-driven kinematics or outflows in high-SFR systems at z ~ 6.

    Authors: We agree that the original text omitted explicit detection significances and upper limits. In the revised manuscript we add these from our spectral fits: the broad Balmer components in the two objects are detected at 6.2σ and 5.8σ, while 3σ upper limits on any broad component in the remaining four objects correspond to <8% of the narrow-line flux and FWHM < 800 km s⁻¹. We have also expanded the discussion to address alternative origins, noting that the absence of correspondingly broad forbidden lines and the compact spatial distribution of the broad emission favor a BLR origin over merger-driven kinematics or outflows; however, we acknowledge that these arguments are not definitive and higher-S/N or multi-epoch data would be required for stronger exclusion. The binary classification therefore rests on both the width threshold and supporting line-profile evidence, but we accept that more quantitative detail was needed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No information is provided on sample completeness, the total number of objects in the combined SHELLQs sample, statistical tests for the correlation, or error budgets on the fractions, making it difficult to assess the robustness of the luminosity threshold.

    Authors: The combined sample comprises the six new targets plus five previously published SHELLQs objects with comparable NIRSpec data, for a total of eleven sources. We have added this total, a brief statement on selection (the parent SHELLQs Lyα-selected sample is not IFU-complete), binomial confidence intervals on the reported fractions, and a Fisher exact test (p = 0.008) for the luminosity correlation. These additions are now included in the revised abstract and results section. We note that the small sample size limits the power of more sophisticated statistics, but the trend remains robust under the binomial errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports JWST NIRSpec IFU spectroscopy of six z~6 SHELLQs targets, classifying two as AGNs via detected broad Balmer components (FWHM>3000 km s^{-1}) and four as non-AGNs based on similar permitted/forbidden line profiles. The correlation with L_Lyα and the AGN fractions (>77% above, <15% below 10^44 erg s^{-1}) are obtained by direct counting after combining with prior SHELLQs objects. No equations, fits, or self-referential definitions reduce these fractions to inputs by construction. Prior SHELLQs citations supply context but are not load-bearing for the new classification or correlation; the result remains falsifiable via independent line-width measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard astrophysical line diagnostics rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Broad Balmer lines with FWHM >3000 km s^{-1} indicate the presence of an AGN
    Invoked to classify two objects as AGNs and to compute the luminosity-dependent fraction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5972 in / 1627 out tokens · 38774 ms · 2026-06-27T15:34:42.089240+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

194 extracted references · 187 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al.\ 2018, , 70, S4. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al.\ 2022, , 74, 247. doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  3. [3]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al.\ 2025a, , 980, 2, L29. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adab76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adab76 2041

  4. [4]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al.\ 2025b, , 991, 1, 37. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

  5. [5]

    A., Greene, J

    Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M. A., Greene, J. E., et al.\ 2013, , 435, 4, 3306. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1500

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1500 2013

  6. [6]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd \'a n, \'A ., Kov \'a cs, O. E., et al.\ 2024, , 969, L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  7. [7]

    Subaru High-$z$ Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). XXV. Large-scale environments of low-luminosity quasars at $z\sim6$ traced by Ly$\alpha$ emitters

    Arita, J., Kashikawa, N., Matsuoka, Y., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.11736. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.11736

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11736 2026

  8. [8]

    F., Prochaska, J

    Arrigoni Battaia, F., Hennawi, J. F., Prochaska, J. X., et al.\ 2019, , 482, 3, 3162. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2827

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2827 2019

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R.\ 1981, , 93, 5. doi:10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  10. [10]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al.\ 2024, , 977, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  11. [11]

    G., Kocevski, D

    Barro, G., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al.\ 2024, , 963, 128. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad167e 2024

  12. [12]

    P., Morganson, E., et al.\ 2015, , 804, 2, 118

    Ba \ n ados, E., Venemans, B. P., Morganson, E., et al.\ 2015, , 804, 2, 118. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/118

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/2/118 2015

  13. [13]

    J., et al.\ 2016, , 831, 1, 39

    Borisova, E., Cantalupo, S., Lilly, S. J., et al.\ 2016, , 831, 1, 39. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/39

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/39 2016

  14. [14]

    Boroson, T. A. & Green, R. F.\ 1992, , 80, 109. doi:10.1086/191661

    work page doi:10.1086/191661 1992

  15. [15]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Bogd \'a n, \'A ., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al.\ 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 126. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9 2024

  16. [16]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al.\ 2021, , 162, 47. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e 2021

  17. [17]

    Bowler, R. A. A., Dunlop, J. S., McLure, R. J., et al.\ 2015, , 452, 1817. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1403

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1403 2015

  18. [18]

    J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al.\ 2024, , 535, 2, 1796

    Boyett, K., Bunker, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al.\ 2024, , 535, 2, 1796. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2430

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2430 2024

  19. [19]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/153.4.471

    Brocklehurst, M.\ 1971, , 153, 471. doi:10.1093/mnras/153.4.471

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/153.4.471 1971

  20. [20]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al.\ 2000, , 533, 682. doi:10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  21. [21]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al.\ 2022, , 938, L15. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0 2022

  22. [22]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al.\ 2023, , 619, 716. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 2023

  23. [23]

    P., Mason, C., et al.\ 2024, , 528, 4, 7052

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al.\ 2024, , 528, 4, 7052. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae455

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae455 2024

  24. [24]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.20533

    Carniani, S., D'Eugenio, F., Ji, X., et al.\ 2024, arXiv:2409.20533. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.20533

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.20533 2024

  25. [25]

    2024, , 633, 318, 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D'Eugenio, F., et al.\ 2024, , 633, 318. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9 2024

  26. [26]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V., et al.\ 2024, , 975, L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7 2024

  27. [27]

    E., Sanders, R

    Clarke, L., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al.\ 2024, , 977, 133. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ba4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ba4 2024

  28. [28]

    P., et al.\ 2017, , 545, 457

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al.\ 2017, , 545, 457. doi:10.1038/nature22358

    work page doi:10.1038/nature22358 2017

  29. [29]

    P., et al.\ 2024, , 689, A219

    Decarli, R., Loiacono, F., Farina, E. P., et al.\ 2024, , 689, A219. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449239

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449239 2024

  30. [30]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab297f

    Decarli, R., Dotti, M., Ba \ n ados, E., et al.\ 2019, , 880, 157. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab297f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab297f 2019

  31. [31]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936813

    Decarli, R., Mignoli, M., Gilli, R., et al.\ 2019, , 631, L10. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936813

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936813 2019

  32. [32]

    2024, , 684, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al.\ 2024, , 684, A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347755

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347755 2024

  33. [33]

    D., et al.\ 2025, , 993, 1, 91

    Ding, X., Onoue, M., Silverman, J. D., et al.\ 2025, , 993, 1, 91. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae045b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae045b 2025

  34. [34]

    D., et al.\ 2023, , 621, 51

    Ding, X., Onoue, M., Silverman, J. D., et al.\ 2023, , 621, 51. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06345-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06345-5 2023

  35. [35]

    L., et al.\ 2013, , 763, 145

    Dom \' nguez, A., Siana, B., Henry, A. L., et al.\ 2013, , 763, 145. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/145

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/145 2013

  36. [36]

    T., McLure, R

    Donnan, C. T., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al.\ 2024, , 533, 3222. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2037 2024

  37. [37]

    A.\ 2023, , 61, 373

    Fan, X., Ba \ n ados, E., & Simcoe, R. A.\ 2023, , 61, 373. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455 2023

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J.\ 2016, , 456, 3354. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2794 2016

  39. [39]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., et al.\ 2023, , 946, L13. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 2023

  40. [40]

    L., Ryan, R

    Finkelstein, S. L., Ryan, R. E., Papovich, C., et al.\ 2015, , 810, 71. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/71

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/71 2015

  41. [41]

    R., Siana, B., Kriek, M., et al.\ 2019, , 873, 102

    Freeman, W. R., Siana, B., Kriek, M., et al.\ 2019, , 873, 102. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0655

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0655 2019

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Fujimoto, S., Wang, B., Weaver, J. R., et al.\ 2024, , 977, 250. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9027

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9027 2024

  43. [43]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin, A., et al.\ 2024, , 628, 57. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 2024

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    Genzel, R., Newman, S., Jones, T., et al.\ 2011, , 733, 101. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/2/101 2011

  45. [45]

    E., Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M

    Greene, J. E., Alexandroff, R., Strauss, M. A., et al.\ 2014, , 788, 1, 91. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/91 2014

  46. [46]

    Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C.\ 2005, , 630, 122. doi:10.1086/431897

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  47. [47]

    J., Duncan, K

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al.\ 2025, , 986, 2, 130. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9 2025

  48. [48]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al.\ 2024, , 964, 39. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  49. [49]

    J., Duncan, K

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2501.04912. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.04912

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.04912 2025

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Goulding, A. D., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al.\ 2023, , 955, L24. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5 2023

  51. [51]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G.\ 2016, , 462, 1757. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1716 2016

  52. [52]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    Harikane, Y., Ono, Y., Ouchi, M., et al.\ 2022, , 259, 20. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc 2022

  53. [53]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al.\ 2023, , 959, 39. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e 2023

  54. [54]

    2015, PASA, 32, e027, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    Hayes, M.\ 2015, , 32, e027. doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.25

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.25 2015

  55. [55]

    Heckman, T. M. & Best, P. N.\ 2014, , 52, 589. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 2014

  56. [56]

    1986, PASP, 98, 609, doi: 10.1086/131801

    Horne, K.\ 1986, , 98, 609. doi:10.1086/131801

    work page doi:10.1086/131801 1986

  57. [57]

    A., Welch, B

    Hutchison, T. A., Welch, B. D., Rigby, J. R., et al.\ 2024, , 136, 4, 044503. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad34fd

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad34fd 2024

  58. [58]

    S., & Noda, H

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H.\ 2025, , 77, 4, 811. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf050

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaf050 2025

  59. [59]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R.\ 2025, , 980, 2, L27. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd 2025

  60. [60]

    K., Yamanaka, S., Ouchi, M., et al.\ 2020, , 72, 101

    Inoue, A. K., Yamanaka, S., Ouchi, M., et al.\ 2020, , 72, 101. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa100

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa100 2020

  61. [61]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada27b

    Iwamoto, R., Matsuoka, Y., Imanishi, M., et al.\ 2025, , 979, 183. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada27b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada27b 2025

  62. [62]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555410

    Iwasawa, K., Gilli, R., Vito, F., et al.\ 2026, , 706, A305. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555410

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555410 2026

  63. [63]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c6

    Izumi, T., Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., et al.\ 2024, , 972, 1, 116. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad57c6 2024

  64. [64]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf6dc

    Izumi, T., Matsuoka, Y., Fujimoto, S., et al.\ 2021, , 914, 36. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf6dc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf6dc 2021

  65. [65]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ef

    Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Matsuoka, Y., et al.\ 2021, , 908, 235. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ef 2021

  66. [66]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psz096

    Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Matsuoka, Y., et al.\ 2019, , 71, 111. doi:10.1093/pasj/psz096

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz096 2019

  67. [67]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psy026

    Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Shirakata, H., et al.\ 2018, , 70, 36. doi:10.1093/pasj/psy026

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psy026 2018

  68. [68]

    M., et al.\ 2024, , 636, 594

    Juod z balis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al.\ 2024, , 636, 594. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08210-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08210-5 2024

  69. [69]

    M., et al.\ 2026, , 546, 3, stag086

    Juod z balis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al.\ 2026, , 546, 3, stag086. doi:10.1093/mnras/stag086

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag086 2026

  70. [70]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15868.x , eprint =

    Kauffmann, G. & Heckman, T. M.\ 2009, , 397, 135. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14960.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14960.x 2009

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al.\ 2003, , 346, 1055. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  72. [72]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psy056

    Kawanomoto, S., Uraguchi, F., Komiyama, Y., et al.\ 2018, , 70, 66. doi:10.1093/pasj/psy056

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psy056 2018

  73. [73]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa074

    Kato, N., Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., et al.\ 2020, , 72, 84. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa074

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa074 2020

  74. [74]

    Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence

    Kennicutt, R. C.\ 1998, , 36, 189. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998

  75. [75]

    Theoretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., et al.\ 2001, , 556, 121. doi:10.1086/321545

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  76. [76]

    2024, A&A, 691, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al.\ 2024, , 691, A52. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348857

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348857 2024

  77. [77]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al.\ 2025, , 986, 2, 126. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  78. [78]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al.\ 2023, , 954, L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0 2023

  79. [79]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    Kokorev, V., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al.\ 2023, , 957, L7. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a 2023

  80. [80]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y.\ 2025, , 995, 1, 24. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae119e 2025

Showing first 80 references.