pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01390 · v1 · pith:DGMOZD2Rnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE

Neutron stars as thermometers for reheating induced dipole dark matter

Sahabub Jahedi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 19:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords dipole dark matterneutron star heatingreheatingeffective field theoryfreeze-infreeze-outdark matter capturedirect detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dipole dark matter with momentum-dependent interactions is captured efficiently by neutron stars, turning their heating into a probe of reheating scenarios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies electromagnetic dipole dark matter in an effective field theory, computing its relic abundance from freeze-out and freeze-in both in standard radiation domination and in non-standard reheating with entropy dilution. It shows that the momentum dependence of the interaction produces high capture rates inside neutron stars. The energy deposited by captured particles then heats the star, yielding temperature signatures that constrain the dark matter mass and dipole strength. This method reaches parameter regions altered by reheating and complements future direct detection experiments.

Core claim

Due to the momentum-dependent nature of the interaction, dipole DM is captured efficiently by neutron stars, thereby making neutron star heating a sensitive probe of the dipole DM parameter space.

What carries the argument

The momentum-dependent electromagnetic dipole interaction in the effective field theory that sets both production rates and neutron-star capture cross sections.

If this is right

  • Neutron-star temperature data exclude portions of the dipole dark matter parameter space that survive reheating dilution.
  • The same capture mechanism tightens bounds on couplings that direct detection experiments reach only at higher masses.
  • Reheating histories that dilute the relic density produce correspondingly lower neutron-star heating signals.
  • Future direct detection runs will test overlapping but not identical slices of the same parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cooling curves of old, isolated neutron stars could be re-analyzed specifically for a dipole-dark-matter contribution.
  • White-dwarf heating offers a parallel probe if the same momentum-dependent capture applies at lower densities.
  • If multiple reheating models predict different dilution factors, neutron-star data could help rank those models.

Load-bearing premise

The dipole interaction remains valid and momentum-dependent at the velocities and densities inside neutron stars without being screened or modified by strong-field effects.

What would settle it

A set of neutron-star temperature measurements that show no excess heating above standard cooling models for dipole strengths and masses allowed by direct detection would falsify the efficient-capture prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01390 by Sahabub Jahedi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: evolution of inflation and radiation energy densities with the scale factor a. Right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagrams that contributes to the DM relic density. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Variation of WIMP DM yield (left) and comoving DM number (right) as with the scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of FIMP DM yield (left) and comoving DM number (right) as with the scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variation of the average energy transfer per single scattering event inside a neutron star as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Parameter space for dipole DM. In each panel, the black solid curve represents the relic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: One loop Feynman diagram responsible for generating magnetic dipole operator. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the electromagnetic interactions of dipole dark matter (DM) within an effective field theory framework, considering both standard and non-standard cosmological scenarios. We first study the prospects of DM production via both the freeze-out and freeze-in mechanisms within the standard radiation-domination. We then investigate how the viable DM parameter space is modified in a non-standard cosmological scenario due to entropy dilution during reheating. Existing constraints on the parameter space are discussed, and we highlight the discovery potential of future direct detection experiments to probe these scenarios. We further investigate the implications of neutron star heating for dipole DM. Due to the momentum-dependent nature of the interaction, dipole DM is captured efficiently by neutron stars, thereby making neutron star heating a sensitive probe of the dipole DM parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper examines dipole dark matter in an EFT framework, computing its thermal production via freeze-out and freeze-in under standard radiation domination and under entropy dilution from reheating. It reviews existing bounds, forecasts direct-detection reach, and argues that the momentum-dependent dipole operator enables efficient neutron-star capture, positioning NS heating as a sensitive probe of the DM parameter space even after reheating-induced dilution.

Significance. Should the capture-rate calculation prove robust, the work supplies a concrete astrophysical channel that can test dipole DM at masses and couplings complementary to terrestrial experiments, while the inclusion of reheating scenarios usefully maps how early-universe entropy injection reshapes the viable parameter space.

major comments (1)
  1. [Neutron-star capture section] Neutron-star capture section: the central claim that the momentum-dependent dipole interaction yields efficient capture (and thus observable heating) rests on the assumption that the EFT remains valid at typical NS kinematics (q ~ few × 100 MeV, v_esc ~ 0.5c, nuclear density). No explicit comparison of these scales to the EFT cutoff or discussion of possible in-medium screening is provided, rendering the sensitivity claim load-bearing but unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and title: the phrasing 'reheating induced dipole dark matter' is slightly misleading; the DM is not induced by reheating but its abundance is diluted by it. A minor rewording would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting this important point regarding the neutron-star capture analysis. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Neutron-star capture section] Neutron-star capture section: the central claim that the momentum-dependent dipole interaction yields efficient capture (and thus observable heating) rests on the assumption that the EFT remains valid at typical NS kinematics (q ~ few × 100 MeV, v_esc ~ 0.5c, nuclear density). No explicit comparison of these scales to the EFT cutoff or discussion of possible in-medium screening is provided, rendering the sensitivity claim load-bearing but unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of EFT validity at neutron-star scales is necessary to support the capture-rate claims. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the neutron-star section that (i) compares the typical momentum transfer q ∼ 100–300 MeV (set by nuclear density and v_esc ≈ 0.5c) to the cutoff scale of the dipole operator (taken to lie above several GeV throughout our parameter space to ensure perturbativity), (ii) notes that the dimension-5 suppression remains under control for the quoted range of couplings, and (iii) briefly addresses in-medium effects, arguing that the momentum dependence of the operator limits the impact of plasma screening on the capture cross section. These additions will be included without changing any numerical results or conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent EFT and cosmological calculations

full rationale

The paper computes DM relic density via standard freeze-out/freeze-in in radiation domination, then modifies it with entropy dilution from reheating, and derives NS capture rates from the momentum-dependent dipole operator in EFT. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-citations; the NS heating sensitivity is an output of the cross-section kinematics applied to escape velocity and nuclear density, using external benchmarks rather than redefining the input interaction. The EFT validity assumption is an unverified modeling choice but does not create a definitional loop or rename a known result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of an effective field theory for dipole interactions, standard freeze-out/in calculations, and the assumption that neutron-star capture rates can be computed from momentum-dependent cross sections without additional model-dependent corrections.

free parameters (3)
  • dipole moment strength
    Fitted or scanned parameter that sets the interaction rate in both production and capture calculations.
  • DM mass
    Scanned parameter that controls both relic density and capture efficiency.
  • reheating temperature or entropy dilution factor
    Parameter introduced to modify the standard radiation-domination history.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Effective field theory description of dipole DM remains valid at neutron-star densities and velocities.
    Required for the capture-rate claim in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard Boltzmann-equation treatment of freeze-out and freeze-in applies in both radiation and reheating eras.
    Underlying production calculations referenced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5652 in / 1397 out tokens · 18878 ms · 2026-07-03T19:25:37.652632+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,Helv

    F. Zwicky,Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln,Helv. Phys. Acta6 (1933) 110

    1933

  2. [2]

    V. C. Rubin, N. Thonnard and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/,Astrophys. J.238(1980) 471

    1980

  3. [3]

    D. J. Schlegel, D. P. Finkbeiner and M. Davis,Maps of dust IR emission for use in estimation of reddening and CMBR foregrounds,Astrophys. J.500(1998) 525 [astro-ph/9710327]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705. [6]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg,Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 165

    1977

  7. [7]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145

    1991

  8. [8]

    Supersymmetric Dark Matter

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  9. [9]

    L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S. M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    UltraViolet Freeze-in

    F. Elahi, C. Kolda and J. Unwin,UltraViolet Freeze-in,JHEP03(2015) 048 [1410.6157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32 (2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,Open J

    R. Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,Open J. Astrophys.4(2021) astro.2006.16182 [2006.16182]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Batell et al.,Conversations and deliberations: Non-standard cosmological epochs and expansion histories,Int

    B. Batell et al.,Conversations and deliberations: Non-standard cosmological epochs and expansion histories,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40(2025) 2530004 [2411.04780]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Big Bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the Standard Model

    S. Sarkar,Big bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the standard model,Rept. Prog. Phys.59(1996) 1493 [hep-ph/9602260]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    What is the lowest possible reheating temperature?

    S. Hannestad,What is the lowest possible reheating temperature?,Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 043506 [astro-ph/0403291]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    De Bernardis, L

    F. De Bernardis, L. Pagano and A. Melchiorri,New constraints on the reheating temperature of the universe after WMAP-5,Astropart. Phys.30(2008) 192

    2008

  18. [18]

    P. F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti,Bounds on very low reheating scenarios after Planck,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123534 [1511.00672]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Bernal and Y

    N. Bernal and Y. Xu,WIMPs during reheating,JCAP12(2022) 017 [2209.07546]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Bernal, K

    N. Bernal, K. Deka and M. Losada,Thermal dark matter with low-temperature reheating,JCAP09(2024) 024 [2406.17039]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. Ghosh, N. Mondal and A. Sarkar,Lepton Collider as a Window to Reheating via Freezing Out Dark Matter Detection,2509.14340

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Mitra, D

    M. Mitra, D. Pradhan and S. Saha,Complex scalar dark matter with effective Higgs portals beyond radiation domination,2512.23228

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Mondal, S

    R. Mondal, S. Mondal and T. Yamada,Freeze-in and freeze-out production of Higgs portal Majorana fermionic dark matter during and after reheating,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 023529 [2503.20738]. 17

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    From WIMP to FIMP during reheating: collider vs non-collider probes for p-wave annihilation

    D. Pradhan, N. Mondal, A. Sarkar, A. Ghosh, S. Sharma, M. Thomas Arun et al., From WIMP to FIMP during reheating: collider vs non-collider probes for p-wave annihilation,2605.27521

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah and R. Roshan,Effective Theory of Freeze-in Dark Matter, JCAP11(2020) 021 [2007.08768]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah and R. Roshan,Nonthermal leptogenesis and UV freeze-in of dark matter: Impact of inflationary reheating,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 035022 [2103.01675]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu, G. Elor, R. McGehee and A. Pierce,Freezing-in hadrophilic dark matter at low reheating temperatures,JHEP01(2023) 128 [2210.15653]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Cosme, F

    C. Cosme, F. Costa and O. Lebedev,Freeze-in at stronger coupling,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 075038 [2306.13061]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    K. K. Boddy, K. Freese, G. Montefalcone and B. Shams Es Haghi,Minimal dark matter freeze-in with low reheating temperatures and implications for direct detection, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063537 [2405.06226]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Barman, S

    B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, D. Pradhan and A. Sarkar,Lepton collider as a window to reheating via freezing in dark matter detection. Part I,Phys. Lett. B869 (2025) 139863 [2406.11963]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Barman, S

    B. Barman, S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, D. Pradhan and A. Sarkar,Lepton collider as a window to reheating via freezing in dark matter detection. Part II,JHEP07(2025) 157 [2410.18198]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Ghosh, P

    A. Ghosh, P. Konar and S. Show,Collider fingerprints of freeze-in dark matter produced during the fast expansion phase of Universe,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055012 [2411.09464]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Bernal, C

    N. Bernal, C. S. Fong and ´O. Zapata,Probing low-reheating scenarios with minimal freeze-in dark matter,JHEP02(2025) 161 [2412.04550]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    B´ elanger, N

    G. B´ elanger, N. Bernal and A. Pukhov,Z’-mediated dark matter with low-temperature reheating,JHEP03(2025) 079 [2412.12303]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Bernal, E

    N. Bernal, E. Cervantes, K. Deka and A. Hryczuk,Freezing-in cannibals with low-reheating temperature,JHEP09(2025) 083 [2506.09155]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Borah, N

    D. Borah, N. Das, S. Jahedi and D. Pradhan,Multi-messenger FIMP,JHEP11 (2025) 049 [2506.13860]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    S. Khan, J. Kim and H. M. Lee,Decaying vector dark matter with low reheating temperature for KM3NeT signal and its impact on gravitational waves,JCAP03 (2026) 083 [2509.17129]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Seasons of Dark Matter Freeze-In Shaped by the Weather of the Early Universe

    F. D’Eramo, A. Lenoci and T. Sassi,Seasons of dark matter freeze-in shaped by the weather of the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 083502 [2511.07511]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Thermal effects on Dark Matter production during cosmic reheating

    M. Drewes, Y. Georis, M. A. S. Mohammed and S. Zell,Thermal effects on Dark Matter production during cosmic reheating,2604.16085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Kaon Portal to Freeze-in Dark Matter

    M. Endo and T. Yamanaka,Kaon Portal to Freeze-in Dark Matter,2605.05947

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Dark-Matter Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments

    K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083501 [astro-ph/0406355]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  42. [42]

    Dipolar Dark Matter

    E. Masso, S. Mohanty and S. Rao,Dipolar Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 036009 [0906.1979]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    Dark Kinetic Heating of Neutron Stars and An Infrared Window On WIMPs, SIMPs, and Pure Higgsinos

    M. Baryakhtar, J. Bramante, S. W. Li, T. Linden and N. Raj,Dark Kinetic Heating of Neutron Stars and An Infrared Window On WIMPs, SIMPs, and Pure Higgsinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 131801 [1704.01577]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Joglekar, N

    A. Joglekar, N. Raj, P. Tanedo and H.-B. Yu,Relativistic capture of dark matter by electrons in neutron stars,Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135767 [1911.13293]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    T. N. Maity and F. S. Queiroz,Detecting bosonic dark matter with neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 083019 [2104.02700]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    D. Bose, D. Chowdhury, P. Mondal and T. S. Ray,Troubles mounting for multipolar dark matter,JHEP06(2024) 014 [2312.05131]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    J. P. Gardner et al.,The James Webb Space Telescope,Space Sci. Rev.123(2006) 485 [astro-ph/0606175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023510 [hep-ph/0602230]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    The Effects of QCD Equation of State on the Relic Density of WIMP Dark Matter

    M. Drees, F. Hajkarim and E. R. Schmitz,The Effects of QCD Equation of State on the Relic Density of WIMP Dark Matter,JCAP06(2015) 025 [1503.03513]. [51]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 151301 [2110.00483]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Barman and N

    B. Barman and N. Bernal,Gravitational SIMPs,JCAP06(2021) 011 [2104.10699]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Dark Matter Production in Late Time Reheating

    K. Harigaya, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada,Dark Matter Production in Late Time Reheating,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083532 [1402.2846]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Harigaya, K

    K. Harigaya, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada,Dark Matter Production during the Thermalization Era,JHEP07(2019) 059 [1901.11027]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Drees and B

    M. Drees and B. Najjari,Energy spectrum of thermalizing high energy decay products in the early universe,JCAP10(2021) 009 [2105.01935]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Drees and B

    M. Drees and B. Najjari,Multi-species thermalization cascade of energetic particles in the early universe,JCAP08(2023) 037 [2205.07741]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Mukaida and M

    K. Mukaida and M. Yamada,Cascades of high-energy SM particles in the primordial thermal plasma,JHEP10(2022) 116 [2208.11708]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter

    R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky,Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 076007 [1108.5383]. [59]XENONcollaboration,Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals in XENON1T,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 251801 [1907.11485]. [60]PandaXcollaboration,Search for Light Dark Matter with Ionization Signals in the PandaX-4T Experiment,Phys...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai,LEP Shines Light on Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 014028 [1103.0240]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Collider Constraints on Dipole-Interacting Dark Matter

    J.-F. Fortin and T. M. P. Tait,Collider Constraints on Dipole-Interacting Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 063506 [1103.3289]. [72]CMScollaboration,Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decayingWorZboson and transverse momentum imbalance at√s= 13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 092005 [1712.02345]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    Arina, A

    C. Arina, A. Cheek, K. Mimasu and L. Pagani,Light and Darkness: consistently coupling dark matter to photons via effective operators,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 223 [2005.12789]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Joglekar, N

    A. Joglekar, N. Raj, P. Tanedo and H.-B. Yu,Dark kinetic heating of neutron stars from contact interactions with relativistic targets,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 123002 [2004.09539]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles and M. Virgato,Improved Treatment of Dark Matter Capture in Neutron Stars,JCAP09(2020) 028 [2004.14888]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Bramante, A

    J. Bramante, A. Delgado and A. Martin,Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063002 [1703.04043]

    work page arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Dasgupta, A

    B. Dasgupta, A. Gupta and A. Ray,Dark matter capture in celestial objects: Improved treatment of multiple scattering and updated constraints from white dwarfs,JCAP08 (2019) 018 [1906.04204]

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles and M. Virgato,Thermalization and annihilation of dark matter in neutron stars,JCAP04(2024) 006 [2312.11892]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    The physics of dense hadronic matter and compact stars

    A. Sedrakian,The Physics of dense hadronic matter and compact stars,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.58(2007) 168 [nucl-th/0601086]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [66]

    TMT Science and Instruments

    D. Crampton, L. Simard and D. Silva,TMT Science and Instruments,Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.(2009) 279 [0801.3634]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    A Community Science Case for E-ELT HIRES

    R. Maiolino et al.,A Community Science Case for E-ELT HIRES,1310.3163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Chatterjee, R

    S. Chatterjee, R. Garani, R. K. Jain, B. Kanodia, M. S. N. Kumar and S. K. Vempati, Faint light of old neutron stars and detectability at the James Webb Space Telescope, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L021301 [2205.05048]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni and S. Robles,Heating up Neutron Stars with Inelastic Dark Matter,JCAP09(2018) 018 [1807.02840]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni and S. Robles,Capture of Leptophilic Dark Matter in Neutron Stars,JCAP06(2019) 054 [1904.09803]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    N. Raj, P. Tanedo and H.-B. Yu,Neutron stars at the dark matter direct detection frontier,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 043006 [1707.09442]

    work page arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Griest and M

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski,Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 615

    1990

  73. [73]

    M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini and K. A. Olive,Reheating and Post-inflationary Production of Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123507 [2004.08404]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, M. K¨ onig, J. Pag` es, A. E. Thomsen and F. Wilsch,A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 662 [2212.04510]. 21

    work page arXiv 2023