AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark
read the original abstract
There is a tendency across different subfields in AI to valorize a small collection of influential benchmarks. These benchmarks operate as stand-ins for a range of anointed common problems that are frequently framed as foundational milestones on the path towards flexible and generalizable AI systems. State-of-the-art performance on these benchmarks is widely understood as indicative of progress towards these long-term goals. In this position paper, we explore the limits of such benchmarks in order to reveal the construct validity issues in their framing as the functionally "general" broad measures of progress they are set up to be.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 22 Pith papers
-
Unsteady Metrics and Benchmarking Cultures of AI Model Builders
AI model builders mostly highlight unique benchmarks that act as flexible narrative tools for market positioning rather than standardized scientific measurements.
-
Matter to Mechanism: A Benchmark for AI Co-Scientists in Materials and Battery Research
Introduces the Matter to Mechanism benchmark of 2,645 structured instances and a composite metric suite for evaluating AI co-scientists on problem-to-hypothesis reasoning in battery materials research.
-
Developmental Trajectories of Situation Modeling and Mentalizing in Transformer Language Models
Larger LLMs acquire basic situation modeling before mentalizing on false-belief tasks, with performance depending on size, training volume, and post-training, yet remaining sensitive to non-factive verbs and agent kno...
-
When Behavioral Safety Evaluation Fails: A Representation-Level Perspective
Behavioral safety metrics for LLMs are insufficient because models can maintain safe outputs while remaining vulnerable to latent-space interventions, as shown via dissociated models and the new Latent Vulnerability Score.
-
The Benchmark Ceiling: Human Judgment, Evaluation Scarcity, and the Political Economy of AI Capability Measurement
Frontier AI benchmarks lose discriminatory power as models saturate easy items, concentrating valid signal in scarce expert-authored hard-tail items whose replacement cost rises convexly with capability.
-
SafetyRepro: Configuration-Conditional Rank Instability on Alignment Benchmarks
Configuration choices alone flip pairwise safety verdicts on every tested alignment benchmark, isolated via a finite-envelope proposition linking disagreement rate to strict ordering reversal.
-
Healthcare LLM Benchmarks Are Only as Good as Their Explicit Assumptions
Healthcare LLM benchmarks overlook implicit assumptions about user behavior that split into task assumptions testable from conversation data and outcome assumptions requiring behavioral studies, shown by reanalyzing a...
-
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
Open-world evaluations using qualitative review of real-world tasks can give earlier warnings of frontier AI capabilities than automated benchmarks, as demonstrated by an AI agent publishing a simple iOS app with one ...
-
Evaluating Multi-turn Human-AI Interaction
Introduces the TCR framework to evaluate educational LLM assistants on transparency, consistency, and refinement in multi-turn interactions, complementing aggregate metrics.
-
The Evaluation Trap: Benchmark Design as Theoretical Commitment
AI benchmarks trap progress by operationalizing assumptions that redefine capabilities around the benchmarks themselves, and Epistematics provides an audit procedure to detect when evaluations cannot discriminate clai...
-
Neural Fields for NV-Center Inverse Sensing
NeTMY neural fields with annealed encoding, multiscale optimization, and spectrum-fidelity losses achieve superior localization and distributional accuracy in NV-center inverse sensing by using a tensor power-summed d...
-
From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World
A practical evaluation protocol for AI pentesting agents that uses validated vulnerability discovery, LLM semantic matching, and bipartite scoring to assess performance in realistic, complex targets.
-
Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics
Community members from the UK blind community, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu helped define what counts as culturally appropriate depictions of artifacts, and the authors tested whether those definitions can be turned into re...
-
The Algorithmic Gaze of Image Quality Assessment: An Audit and Trace Ethnography of the LAION-Aesthetics Predictor
LAION-Aesthetics Predictor reinforces Western and male biases by preferentially selecting images associated with women and realistic Western/Japanese art while excluding men, LGBTQ+ references, and other styles.
-
Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models
The paper compiles practical lessons on reproducible LM evaluation and introduces the lm-eval library to mitigate common methodological problems in NLP.
-
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
PaLM 540B demonstrates continued scaling benefits by setting new few-shot SOTA results on hundreds of benchmarks and outperforming humans on BIG-bench.
-
Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
Aggregate leaderboards for LLM agents lack predictive validity for out-of-distribution settings, and the paper proposes ranking by in-sample to out-of-sample rank correlation instead of mean score.
-
AI Sandboxes: A Threat Model, Taxonomy, and Measurement Framework
The paper presents a threat model, taxonomy, and six-dimension measurement framework for AI sandboxes to clarify valid testing claims for safety, security, and regulatory assurance.
-
The Measurement Gap in the Automation of EU Law: Benchmarking Doctrinal Legal Reasoning under the EU AI Act
No benchmark exists for doctrinal legal reasoning in LLMs, leaving the EU AI Act's accuracy mandate for judicial AI without an operational test.
-
Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics
Case studies with blind UK residents and people from Kerala and Tamil Nadu demonstrate that community input at the systematization stage produces culturally grounded definitions of appropriateness for text-to-image mo...
-
VERA-MH Concept Paper
VERA-MH proposes an automated pipeline using simulated conversations and a rubric to evaluate AI chatbots on suicide risk handling in mental health contexts.
-
PaLM 2 Technical Report
PaLM 2 reports state-of-the-art results on language, reasoning, and multilingual tasks with improved efficiency over PaLM.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.