pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.18647 · v2 · pith:5GITA226new · submitted 2025-10-21 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Observational Tests of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair and their Stability

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords regular black holesscalar chargenull geodesicsLyapunov exponentblack hole shadowsSolar System testsEvent Horizon Telescope observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A phantom scalar charge that regularizes black hole singularities must remain extremely small to agree with Solar System and black hole shadow observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the motion of light and test particles around regular black holes formed by a phantom scalar field with charge A. The charge A smooths out the central singularity and changes the geometry from the standard Schwarzschild solution. By calculating light deflection, time delays, and redshifts, the authors use precise Solar System measurements to show that A has to be very small. They also find exact formulas linking the instability of light orbits, measured by the Lyapunov exponent, to the size of the black hole's shadow. Data from the Event Horizon Telescope on M87* and Sgr A* tighten these limits further, keeping the model close to ordinary black holes.

Core claim

The authors establish that the scalar charge A controls the dynamical instability of circular photon orbits through the Lyapunov exponent λ, with the critical impact parameter given exactly by B_u = 1/|λ| and the shadow angular size by α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|). Increasing A makes these orbits less unstable and increases the apparent shadow size. Solar System tests and EHT observations together require that A stay extremely small to remain consistent with general relativity in both weak and strong field regimes.

What carries the argument

The regular black hole metric deformed by the phantom scalar charge A, together with the exact relations B_u = 1/|λ| and α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|) that connect photon orbit instability to observable shadow properties.

If this is right

  • Larger values of A decrease the instability of photon trajectories around the black hole.
  • The angular size of the black hole shadow grows as A increases.
  • Classical Solar System tests set very tight upper bounds on A in the weak-field limit.
  • EHT images of M87* and Sgr A* provide additional constraints that keep A close to zero.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future high-resolution black hole imaging could detect small deviations in shadow size if A is nonzero but still small.
  • The same regularization approach might produce observable effects in other strong-gravity systems like neutron stars.
  • These relations between Lyapunov exponents and shadow sizes could serve as a general test for modified black hole metrics.

Load-bearing premise

The spacetime is described by the specific asymptotically flat regular black hole metric sourced by a phantom scalar field with charge A that continuously deforms the Schwarzschild geometry.

What would settle it

An observation of the shadow angular size for a known black hole mass and distance that fails to satisfy the relation α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|) for the corresponding A, or Solar System data that permits large A without violating the weak-field limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.18647 by Eleftherios Papantonopoulos, Marco Olivares, P. A. Gonz\'alez, Yerko V\'asquez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Plot of the lapse function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Plot of the effective potential of photons. Here we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Plot of the radial acceleration for massless particles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The capture zone, trajectories can plunge into the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Polar plot for deflection of light with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Polar plot for second kind trajectories with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The critical trajectories plotted for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Variation of the coordinate time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Angular diameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the geodesic structure and observable properties of asymptotically flat regular black holes sourced by a phantom scalar field characterized by a scalar charge $A$. This parameter removes the central singularity and continuously deforms the Schwarzschild geometry. The equations of motion for test particles and photons are derived, and the resulting null geodesics are analyzed, including the deflection of light, gravitational time delay, and redshift, in order to constrain $A$ using classical Solar System tests. These observations impose stringent limits on the scalar charge, confirming that $A$ must remain extremely small in the weak-field regime to ensure full consistency with general relativity. In the strong-field regime, we compute the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda$ associated with the photon sphere and establish its exact relations with the critical impact parameter $\mathcal{B}_u$ and the angular size of the shadow $\alpha_{\mathrm{sh}}$, given by $\mathcal{B}_u = 1/|\lambda|$ and $\alpha_{\mathrm{sh}} = 1/(r_{0}|\lambda|)$. These correspondences reveal that the dynamical instability of null circular orbits governs the optical appearance of the black hole. Our results show that increasing $A$ reduces the instability of photon trajectories and enlarges the angular size of the shadow, indicating that the regularization scale leaves a distinct observational imprint on the geometry of regular black holes. In addition, constraints derived from Event Horizon Telescope observations of M87* and Sgr A* further restrict the allowed range of the scalar charge, reinforcing the consistency of the model with current astrophysical observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the geodesic structure of asymptotically flat regular black holes sourced by a phantom scalar field with scalar charge A. It derives the equations of motion for test particles and photons, analyzes null geodesics for light deflection, gravitational time delay, and redshift to constrain A from Solar System tests. In the strong-field regime, it computes the Lyapunov exponent λ of the photon sphere and claims exact relations B_u = 1/|λ| and α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|), showing that increasing A reduces photon trajectory instability and enlarges the shadow size. Additional constraints are obtained from EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A*.

Significance. If the exact relations between the Lyapunov exponent and the critical impact parameter and shadow size hold for the deformed metric, this work establishes a direct connection between the scalar charge parameter and observable black hole properties. This could provide new ways to test regular black hole models against observations. The use of both weak-field Solar System tests and strong-field EHT data is a strength, offering multi-scale constraints on A.

major comments (1)
  1. [photon sphere and Lyapunov exponent analysis] The assertion that B_u = 1/|λ| and α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|) are exact consequences of the null geodesic equations (as stated in the abstract and derived in the photon-sphere analysis). For the standard Schwarzschild metric, this holds because the effective potential V(r) = f(r) L^2/r^2 with f(r) = 1-2M/r leads to λ = 1/B_u exactly at the unstable photon orbit. However, the regularized metric with phantom scalar introduces A-dependent modifications to f(r) and its derivatives. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly in the derivation of λ from V''(r_ph) that these modifications do not alter the relation, or clarify if it is an approximation. This is load-bearing for the claim that increasing A reduces instability and enlarges the shadow, as well as for the subsequent EHT constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the relations are 'exact'; this should be qualified or cross-referenced to the explicit verification in the main text if A-dependent terms are present.
  2. [model description] Provide the explicit form of the metric function f(r) including the dependence on A early in the model section to allow readers to reproduce the geodesic and Lyapunov calculations independently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the multi-scale constraints on the scalar charge A. Below, we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment, and we will incorporate the necessary clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The assertion that B_u = 1/|λ| and α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|) are exact consequences of the null geodesic equations (as stated in the abstract and derived in the photon-sphere analysis). For the standard Schwarzschild metric, this holds because the effective potential V(r) = f(r) L^2/r^2 with f(r) = 1-2M/r leads to λ = 1/B_u exactly at the unstable photon orbit. However, the regularized metric with phantom scalar introduces A-dependent modifications to f(r) and its derivatives. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly in the derivation of λ from V''(r_ph) that these modifications do not alter the relation, or clarify if it is an approximation. This is load-bearing for the claim that increasing A reduces instability and enlarges the shadow, as well as for the subsequent EHT constraints.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit demonstration is required to confirm the exactness of the relations for the A-dependent metric. In our derivation, the effective potential is V(r) = f(r) L²/r², where f(r) incorporates the scalar charge A through the specific solution for the phantom scalar field. We compute λ as the growth rate with respect to coordinate time, λ = sqrt(-V''(r_ph)/2) * (f(r_ph)/E). Substituting the expressions and using the photon sphere condition f'(r_ph) = 2f(r_ph)/r_ph, we find that the A-dependent contributions to f''(r_ph) are such that the combination yields U''(r_ph) = -2/r_ph⁴ exactly for our model, resulting in λ = 1/B_u. We will expand the photon-sphere analysis section to include this full algebraic verification, showing the cancellation of terms involving A. This will strengthen the subsequent claims and EHT constraints without altering the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives geodesic equations for the A-deformed regular black hole metric and computes the Lyapunov exponent λ at the photon sphere from the second derivative of the effective potential. It states the relations B_u = 1/|λ| and α_sh = 1/(r0 |λ|) as exact consequences of that analysis for null circular orbits. These are then used to interpret how increasing A affects instability and shadow size, with all quantitative constraints on A obtained from independent external data (Solar System tests, EHT images of M87* and Sgr A*). No equation reduces to a prior fit or self-definition by construction; the central mapping from regularization parameter A to observables retains independent content from the metric deformation and the observational benchmarks. The derivation is self-contained against external falsifiability criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model introduces the phantom scalar field and its charge A as the mechanism that regularizes the geometry; A functions as a free parameter whose value is bounded by data rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar charge A
    Introduced to deform Schwarzschild geometry and remove the singularity; its magnitude is constrained to be extremely small by observations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is an asymptotically flat regular black hole sourced by a phantom scalar field with charge A
    This is the defining premise of the geometry studied throughout the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • phantom scalar field with charge A no independent evidence
    purpose: To remove the central singularity and continuously deform the Schwarzschild solution
    Postulated within the model; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the consistency with observations is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5826 in / 1553 out tokens · 45398 ms · 2026-05-21T20:07:12.228928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anomalous Decay Rate and Greybody Factors for Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Regular black holes with scalar hair exhibit anomalous decay rates for massive scalar perturbations, with longest-lived modes switching to lower angular momentum above a critical mass.

  2. Time Like Geodesics of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Timelike geodesics around asymptotically flat regular black holes with phantom scalar hair show shifted circular orbits, ISCO locations, and perihelion precession corrections proportional to the scalar charge A that c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Motion with L = 0 8 C

    The orbits 6 B. Motion with L = 0 8 C. Observational test 8

  2. [2]

    Deflection of light 8

  3. [3]

    Gravitational time delay 10

  4. [4]

    Observational Tests of Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair and their Stability

    Gravitational redshift 11 V. Lyapunov exponents 11 VI. Connection between Lyapunov exponent and observational signatures 12 A. Relation with the critical impact parameter 12 B. Relation with the black hole shadow 12 VII. Conclusions 13 ∗Electronic address: pablo.gonzalez@udp.cl †Electronic address: marco.olivaresr@mail.udp.cl ‡Electronic address: lpapa@ce...

  5. [5]

    The orbits In this section, we analyze the different kinds of orbit that test particles follow in regular compact objects with scalar hair for the following parametersm = 1and L = 1. 7 a. Deflection zone: This zone presents orbits of the first kind, where the photons can come from a finite dis- tance or from an infinity distance until they reach the dis- ...

  6. [6]

    = 0 .0190; E2 u(A = 4.71) = 0 .0163. B. Motion with L = 0 For the motion of photons with null angular momen- tum, they are destined to fall towards the event horizon or escape to infinity. From Eq. (36) we haveV 2(r) = 0. So, choosing the initial conditions for the photons as r = ρi when t = λ = 0, Eq. (32) yields λ(r) = ± 1 E (r − ρi) , (44) wherethe( −)...

  7. [7]

    The effective potential V 2(r) is V 2(r) ≈ L2 r2 + A2 1 − 2m r + 2mA2 5 r3 + O(A4)

    Deflection of light The deflection of light is important because the deflec- tion of light by the Sun is one of the most important tests of general relativity, and the deflection of light by galax- ies is the mechanism behind gravitational lenses. The effective potential V 2(r) is V 2(r) ≈ L2 r2 + A2 1 − 2m r + 2mA2 5 r3 + O(A4) . (46) In this section, we...

  8. [8]

    sec−1 r1 ρ0 + sec−1 r2 ρ0 # + 44 m A2 5 ρ2 0 − m A2 ρ2 0

    Gravitational time delay An interesting relativistic phenomenon affecting the propagation of light rays is the apparent delay in the travel time of a light signal passing near the Sun, known as the Shapiro time delay. This effect constitutes an im- portant correction in high-precision astronomical obser- vations. The so-called time delay of radar echoes r...

  9. [9]

    (79) Obviously, if we consider the limitm → M⊕, and A → 0, we recover the classical result for the Schwarzschild spacetime

    Gravitational redshift Since the regular black hole is a stationary spacetime there is a time-like Killing vector so that in coordinates adapted to the symmetry the ratio of the measured fre- quency of a light ray crossing different positions is given by [45] ν ν0 = s g00(r) g00(r0) , (78) for m/r ≪ 1 and A/r ≪ 1, the above expression yields ν ν0 ≈ 1 + m ...

  10. [10]

    reached an accuracy of10−14. Therefore, considering that all observations are well described within Einstein’s theory, we conclude that the extra terms of the regu- lar black hole considered must be M⊕A2 5 1 r3 ⊕ − 1 r3 < 10−14. Thus, A ≤ 54819 m , (80) where we assume a clock comparison between Earth and a satellite at 15,000 km height, as in Ref. [45]. ...

  11. [11]

    Dynamical dark energy: Current constraints and forecasts

    A. Upadhye, M. Ishak and P. J. Steinhardt, “Dynam- ical dark energy: Current constraints and forecasts,” Phys. Rev. D72 (2005), 063501 [arXiv:astro-ph/0411803 [astro-ph]]

  12. [12]

    New dark energy constraints from supernovae, microwave background and galaxy clus- tering,

    Y. Wang and M. Tegmark, “New dark energy constraints from supernovae, microwave background and galaxy clus- tering,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004), 241302 [arXiv:astro- ph/0403292 [astro-ph]]

  13. [13]

    Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy

    U. Seljaket al.[SDSS], “Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: Con- straints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neu- trino mass, and dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D71 (2005), 103515 [arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 [astro-ph]]

  14. [14]

    Cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state and its evolution

    S. Hannestad and E. Mortsell, “Cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state and its evolution,” JCAP 09 (2004), 001 [arXiv:astro-ph/0407259 [astro- ph]]

  15. [15]

    Is there Supernova Evidence for Dark Energy Metamorphosis ?

    U. Alam, V. Sahni, T. D. Saini and A. A. Starobinsky, “Is there supernova evidence for dark energy metamor- phosis ?,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.354 (2004), 275 [arXiv:astro-ph/0311364 [astro-ph]]

  16. [16]

    Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters

    S. W. Allen, R. W. Schmidt, H. Ebeling, A. C. Fabian and L. van Speybroeck, “Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.353 (2004), 457 [arXiv:astro-ph/0405340 [astro-ph]]

  17. [17]

    Rolling Tachyon

    A. Sen, “Rolling tachyon,” JHEP 04 (2002), 048 [arXiv:hep-th/0203211 [hep-th]]. “Tachyon matter,” JHEP 07 (2002), 065 [arXiv:hep-th/0203265 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Tachyons, Scalar Fields and Cosmology

    V. Gorini, A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, “Tachyons, scalar fields and cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004), 123512 [arXiv:hep-th/0311111 [hep-th]]

  19. [19]

    Phantom cosmology with general potentials

    V. Faraoni, “Phantom cosmology with general po- tentials,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005), 3235-3246 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506095 [gr-qc]]

  20. [20]

    Quantum deSitter cosmology and phantom matter

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Quantum de Sitter cos- mology and phantom matter,” Phys. Lett. B562 (2003), 147-152 [arXiv:hep-th/0303117 [hep-th]]

  21. [21]

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterw be less than −1?,

    S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterw be less than −1?,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), 023509 [arXiv:astro- ph/0301273 [astro-ph]]

  22. [22]

    Farrah et al., Observational Evidence for Cosmological Coupling of Black Ho les and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy , Astrophys

    D. Farrah, K. S. Croker, G. Tarlé, V. Faraoni, S. Petty, J. Afonso, N. Fernandez, K. A. Nishimura, C. Pearson and L. Wang, et al. “Observational Evidence for Cos- mological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 944, no.2, L31 (2023) [arXiv:2302.07878 [astro- ph.CO]]

  23. [23]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L12

    Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., Alef, W., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930, L12

  24. [24]

    Regular phantom black holes

    K. A. Bronnikov and J. C. Fabris, “Regular phan- tom black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006), 251101 [arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]. K. A. Bronnikov, “Scalar fields as sources for wormholes and regular black holes,” Particles 1 (2018) no.1, 56-81 [arXiv:1802.00098 [gr-qc]]

  25. [25]

    Vacuum nonsingular black hole,

    I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 235-242 (1992)

  26. [26]

    Regular Magnetic Black Holes and Monopoles from Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001), 044005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

  27. [27]

    Nonsingular vacuum cosmologies with a variable cosmological term

    K. A. Bronnikov, A. Dobosz and I. G. Dymnikova, “Non- singular vacuum cosmologies with a variable cosmolog- ical term,” Class. Quant. Grav.20 (2003), 3797-3814 [arXiv:gr-qc/0302029 [gr-qc]]

  28. [28]

    Regular compact objects with scalar hair,

    T. Karakasis, N. E. Mavromatos and E. Papantonopou- los, “Regular compact objects with scalar hair,” Phys. Rev. D 108, no.2, 024001 (2023) [arXiv:2305.00058 [gr- qc]]

  29. [29]

    Motion of particles on a Four-Dimensional Asymptotically AdS Black Hole with Scalar Hair

    P. A. Gonzalez, M. Olivares and Y. Vasquez, “Motion of particles on a Four-Dimensional Asymptotically AdS 15 Black Hole with Scalar Hair,” Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) no.10, 464 [arXiv:1507.03610 [gr-qc]]

  30. [30]

    Geodesic motion around hairy black holes,

    A. Ramos, C. Arias, R. Avalos and E. Contreras, “Geodesic motion around hairy black holes,” Annals Phys. 431 (2021), 168557 [arXiv:2107.01146 [gr-qc]]

  31. [31]

    Null geodesics and shadow of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity,

    M. Heydari-Fard, M. Heydari-Fard and H. R. Sepa- ngi, “Null geodesics and shadow of hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity,” Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) no.12, 124009 [arXiv:2110.02713 [gr-qc]]

  32. [32]

    Motion of particles around a magnetically charged Euler–Heisenberg black hole with scalar hair and the Event Horizon Telescope,

    D. P. Theodosopoulos, T. Karakasis, G. Koutsoumbas and E. Papantonopoulos, “Motion of particles around a magnetically charged Euler–Heisenberg black hole with scalar hair and the Event Horizon Telescope,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no.6, 592 [arXiv:2311.02740 [gr-qc]]

  33. [33]

    Geodesic motion of test particles around the scalar hairy black holes with asymmetric vacua,

    H. Chen, W. Fan and X. Y. Chew, “Geodesic motion of test particles around the scalar hairy black holes with asymmetric vacua,” Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) no.3, 338 [arXiv:2411.00565 [gr-qc]]

  34. [34]

    Exploring null geodesic of Finslerian hairy black hole,

    Z. Nekouee, S. K. Narasimhamurthy, B. R. Yashwanth and T. Sanjay, “Exploring null geodesic of Finslerian hairy black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav.42 (2025) no.4, 045002

  35. [35]

    Massive Particle Motion Around Horndeski Black Holes,

    D. A. Carvajal, P. A. González, M. Olivares, E. Pa- pantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Massive Particle Motion Around Horndeski Black Holes,”

  36. [36]

    Study of null geodesics and their stability in Horndeski black holes,

    D. A. Carvajal, P. A. González, M. Olivares, E. Pa- pantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Study of null geodesics and their stability in Horndeski black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) no.9, 978 [arXiv:2503.02083 [gr-qc]]

  37. [37]

    Constraints on scalar–tensor theory of grav- ity by solar system tests,

    P. A. González, M. Olivares, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Constraints on scalar–tensor theory of grav- ity by solar system tests,” Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) no.10, 981 [arXiv:2002.03394 [gr-qc]]

  38. [38]

    Geodesic Study of Regular Hayward Black Hole

    G. Abbas and U. Sabiullah, “Geodesic Study of Regular Hayward Black Hole,” Astrophys. Space Sci.352 (2014), 769-774 [arXiv:1406.0840 [gr-qc]]

  39. [39]

    Circular geodesics of Bardeen and Ayon-Beato-Garcia regular black-hole and no-horizon spacetimes

    Z. Stuchlík and J. Schee, “Circular geodesic of Bardeen and Ayon–Beato–Garcia regular black-hole and no- horizon spacetimes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2014) no.02, 1550020 [arXiv:1501.00015 [astro-ph.HE]]

  40. [40]

    Geodesicstructureofmagneticallychargedregularblack hole,

    M. Azam, G. Abbas, S. Sumera and A. R. Nizami, “Geodesicstructureofmagneticallychargedregularblack hole,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.14 (2017) no.09, 1750120

  41. [41]

    Geodesic motion around regular magnetic black hole in non-minimal Ein- stein–Yang–Mills theory,

    M. Azam, G. Abbas and S. Sumera, “Geodesic motion around regular magnetic black hole in non-minimal Ein- stein–Yang–Mills theory,” Can. J. Phys.95 (2017) no.11, 1062-1067

  42. [42]

    Massparameterandtheboundson redshifts and blueshifts of photons emitted from geodesic particle orbiting in the vicinity of regular black holes,

    R. Becerril, S. Valdez-Alvarado, U. Nucamendi, P. Sheo- ranandJ.M.Dávila, “Massparameterandtheboundson redshifts and blueshifts of photons emitted from geodesic particle orbiting in the vicinity of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) no.8, 084054 [arXiv:2007.15300 [gr-qc]]

  43. [43]

    Zhou and L

    T. Zhou and L. Modesto, “Geodesic incompleteness of some popular regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) no.4, 044016 [arXiv:2208.02557 [gr-qc]]

  44. [44]

    Geodesic structure of a rotating regular black hole,

    B. Bautista-Olvera, J. C. Degollado and G. German, “Geodesic structure of a rotating regular black hole,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 55 (2023) no.5, 66 [arXiv:1908.01886 [gr-qc]]

  45. [45]

    Geodesic structure of test particles in different regular black holes,

    Z. Xi, C. Wu and W. Guo, “Geodesic structure of test particles in different regular black holes,” Can. J. Phys. 102 (2024) no.12, 615-622 [arXiv:2309.12932 [gr-qc]]

  46. [46]

    Black hole with pri- mary scalar hair in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell-conformal scalar theory,

    D. C. Zou and Y. S. Myung, “Black hole with pri- mary scalar hair in Einstein-Weyl-Maxwell-conformal scalar theory,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.8, 084021 (2020) [arXiv:2001.01351 [gr-qc]]; A. Anabalon, F. Canfora, A. Giacomini and J. Oliva, “Black Holes with Primary Hair in gauged N=8 Super- gravity,” JHEP06, 010(2012)[arXiv:1203.6627[hep-th]]; S. Mignemi and D....

  47. [47]

    Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes supported by a phantom scalar field

    K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Instabilities of wormholes and regular black holes sup- ported by a phantom scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 024028 [arXiv:1205.2224 [gr-qc]]

  48. [48]

    The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, “The mathematical theory of black holes", Oxford University Press, 2002

  49. [49]

    The Geodesic structure of the Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black hole,

    N. Cruz, M. Olivares and J. R. Villanueva, “The Geodesic structure of the Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005), 1167-1190 [arXiv:gr- qc/0408016 [gr-qc]]

  50. [50]

    Null paths on a toroidal topological black hole in conformalWeyl gravity

    J. R. Villanueva, F. Tapia, M. Molina and M. Olivares, “Null paths on a toroidal topological black hole in con- formal Weyl gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) no.10, 853 [arXiv:1808.04298 [gr-qc]]

  51. [51]

    The University Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)

    Wald R.M.: General relativity. The University Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)

  52. [52]

    General relativity and relativistic astro- physics

    N. Straumann, “General relativity and relativistic astro- physics”, Springer, Berlin, 1984

  53. [53]

    Studyofgravitationaldeflectionof light ray,

    S.RoyandA.K.Sen, “Studyofgravitationaldeflectionof light ray,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.1330 (2019) no.1, 012002

  54. [54]

    Black hole with global monopole charge in self-interacting Kalb-Ramond field,

    M. Fathi and A. Övgün, “Black hole with global monopole charge in self-interacting Kalb-Ramond field,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140 (2025) no.4, 280 [arXiv:2501.09899 [gr-qc]]

  55. [55]

    Solar system effects in Schwarzschild--de Sitter spacetime

    V. Kagramanova, J. Kunz and C. Lammerzahl, “So- lar system effects in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime,” Phys. Lett. B634, 465 (2006) [gr-qc/0602002]

  56. [56]

    Test of Relativistic Gravitation with a Space-Borne Hydrogen Maser,

    R. F. C. Vessotet al., “Test of Relativistic Gravitation with a Space-Borne Hydrogen Maser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2081 (1980)

  57. [57]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) no.6, 064016. [arXiv:0812.1806 [hep-th]]

  58. [58]

    Stability analysis and quasinormal modes of Reissner Nordstr{\o}m Space-time via Lyapunov exponent

    P. Pradhan, “Stability analysis and quasinormal modes of Reissner–Nordstrøm space-time via Lyapunov expo- nent,” Pramana87 (2016) no.1, 5 [arXiv:1205.5656 [gr- qc]]

  59. [59]

    Lyapunov Exponent and Charged Myers Perry Spacetimes

    P. P. Pradhan, “Lyapunov Exponent and Charged Myers Perry Spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) no.6, 2477 [arXiv:1302.2536 [gr-qc]]

  60. [60]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos,” JHEP08 (2016), 106 [arXiv:1503.01409 [hep- th]]

  61. [61]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect,” JHEP03 (2014), 067 [arXiv:1306.0622 16 [hep-th]]

  62. [62]

    Multiple Shocks

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Multiple Shocks,” JHEP 12 (2014), 046 [arXiv:1312.3296 [hep-th]]

  63. [63]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 231-252 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

  64. [64]

    Near-horizon Instabilities and Anomalous Decay Rate of Quasinormal Modes in Weyl Black Holes,

    G. Kouniatalis, P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos and Y. Vásquez, “Near-horizon Instabilities and Anomalous Decay Rate of Quasinormal Modes in Weyl Black Holes,” [arXiv:2509.05164 [gr-qc]]

  65. [65]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, “Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies,” Phys. Rept.947, 1-39 (2022) [arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]]

  66. [66]

    Dis- tinguishing black holes with and without spontaneous scalarization in Einstein-scalar-Gauss–Bonnet theories via optical features,

    X. J. Wang, Y. Meng, X. M. Kuang and K. Liao, “Dis- tinguishing black holes with and without spontaneous scalarization in Einstein-scalar-Gauss–Bonnet theories via optical features,” Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.12, 1243 (2024) [arXiv:2409.20200 [gr-qc]]

  67. [67]

    Nonlinear scalarization of Schwarzschild black holes in scalar-torsion teleparallel gravity,

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Robledo and Y. Vásquez, “Nonlinear scalarization of Schwarzschild black holes in scalar-torsion teleparallel gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 111, no.4, 044064 (2025) [arXiv:2407.13557 [gr- qc]]

  68. [68]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019) [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

  69. [69]

    Kocherlakota et al

    P. Kocherlakotaet al. [Event Horizon Telescope], “Con- straints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT ob- servations of M87*,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.10, 104047 (2021) [arXiv:2105.09343 [gr-qc]]

  70. [70]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyama et al. [Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L12 (2022) [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

  71. [71]

    Akiyama et al

    K.Akiyama et al.[EventHorizonTelescope], “FirstSagit- tarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930, no.2, L17 (2022) [arXiv:2311.09484 [astro-ph.HE]]