Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 65 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

Third rung of exciton ladder is a spin-flipped pair, not three excitons

2026-07-09 05:52 UTC pith:6TP5BC7B

load-bearing objection Resolves the unequal-spacing puzzle in dipolar exciton ladders via spin-valley assignment; the g-factor sign reversal is the key diagnostic and the cross-checks are solid. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07590 v1 pith:6TP5BC7B submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mes-hall

Unveiling the Spin-Valley Structure of Dipolar Exciton Ladders in R-stacked WSe₂/WS₂ Moir\'e Heterobilayers

Byeong Wook Cho , Tatyana V. Ivanova , Zhe Li , Takashi Taniguchi , Kenji Watanabe , Brian D. Gerardot , Mauro Brotons-Gisbert This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 78.67.-n71.35.-y73.21.Fg78.55.-m
keywords dipolarexcitonmoirtwo-excitonheterobilayersladderschargefilling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses helicity-resolved magneto-photoluminescence to dissect the so-called dipolar exciton ladder in R-stacked WSe₂/WS₂ moiré heterobilayers. When multiple interlayer excitons (electron–hole pairs split across two adjacent atomic layers) occupy the same nanoscale moiré trap, their mutual electric-dipole repulsion produces a series of equally spaced emission peaks—a dipolar ladder. The authors show that this simple picture is incomplete: the internal spin and valley structure of the excitons matters. At charge neutrality, the first two ladder rungs are a spin-triplet single exciton and a triplet–triplet two-exciton state separated by 38 meV. The apparent third rung, previously assumed to be a three-exciton state, is instead a triplet–singlet two-exciton configuration. The key evidence is its effective g-factor of +3.16, opposite in sign to the −8.7 of the triplet states, matching the predicted response of a spin-singlet interlayer exciton. The 22 meV energy offset between the second and third rungs corresponds to the WS₂ conduction-band spin splitting rather than an additional dipolar repulsion energy. At one-electron filling (ν = 1) of the moiré lattice, the correlated electron background reshapes the spectrum: charged exciton–carrier complexes appear, intervalley and intravalley two-exciton configurations split apart, and the effective exciton–exciton repulsion is reduced by roughly 4 meV, indicating that resident electrons partially screen the dipolar interaction.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the dipolar exciton ladder in R-stacked WSe₂/WS₂ is not a simple occupation-number sequence (one exciton, two excitons, three excitons) but is instead structured by the spin–valley physics of the constituent transition-metal dichalcogenide layers. The third emission peak carries a positive g-factor (+3.16), opposite to the negative g-factors (−8.7) of the first two peaks, proving it involves a spin-singlet interlayer exciton transition rather than a third spin-triplet exciton. Its 22 meV separation from the second peak matches the WS₂ conduction-band spin splitting. This identification resolves the puzzle of unequal ladder spacing that pure dipolar repulsion—38–

What carries the argument

The diagnostic tool is the effective exciton g-factor extracted from Zeeman splitting in helicity-resolved magneto-photoluminescence. The sign of the g-factor distinguishes spin-triplet from spin-singlet interlayer exciton transitions because the spin-split conduction bands of WS₂ produce opposite valley-Zeeman responses. The degree of circular polarization under helicity-selective excitation further separates intervalley (nearly unpolarized) from intravalley (polarized) two-exciton configurations. Power-law scaling of emission intensity versus excitation power distinguishes single-exciton (sublinear), two-exciton (superlinear), and higher-order many-body states.

Load-bearing premise

The spin–valley assignment of the third ladder rung as a triplet–singlet two-exciton state relies on interpreting its measured g-factor within a single-particle framework; if many-body corrections substantially shift the effective g-factor, the singlet identification could be ambiguous.

What would settle it

A many-body calculation or independent measurement showing that the g-factor of a three-exciton state could also be positive and near +3 would undermine the key identification of IX₃ as a two-exciton singlet state rather than a three-exciton state.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The spin–valley-resolved ladder structure means that spectroscopic peaks in moiré heterobilayers cannot be assigned exciton occupation numbers without accounting for conduction-band spin splitting, which may require revisiting prior interpretations of dipolar ladders in similar systems.
  • The reduction of effective dipolar repulsion by resident electrons at ν = 1 demonstrates a tunable interaction knob: electrostatic doping can screen exciton–exciton interactions, potentially enabling controlled crossover between strongly and weakly interacting exciton regimes in the moiré lattice.
  • The observation of charged two-exciton states (IX₂(T,T)+e and IX₂(T,S)+e) with g-factors matching their neutral counterparts suggests that the spin–valley structure of multi-exciton complexes survives coupling to a fermionic background, supporting the use of these systems as simulators of Bose–Fermi Hubbard physics.
  • The helicity-dependent splitting of IX′₂ into intervalley and intravalley components at ν = 1 provides a spectroscopic handle on the valley structure of the correlated electronic background, which is otherwise difficult to probe directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a helicity-resolved magneto-photoluminescence study of dipolar exciton ladders in R-stacked WSe2/WS2 moiré heterobilayers. The authors demonstrate that the unequal energy spacing of the exciton ladder at charge neutrality arises from distinct spin-valley configurations rather than simple occupation-number physics. Specifically, they identify the first three rungs as a spin-triplet interlayer exciton (IX1), a triplet-triplet two-exciton state (IX2), and a triplet-singlet two-exciton state (IX3), with the latter's 22 meV offset matching the WS2 conduction-band spin splitting. The key diagnostic is the sign reversal of the g-factor for IX3 (g = +3.16) compared to IX1 and IX2 (g ≈ -8.7). At one-electron filling (ν=1), the authors observe charged exciton-carrier complexes and a reduction of the effective dipolar repulsion, attributing these to screening by the correlated electronic background.

Significance. The paper provides a microscopic spin-valley-resolved picture of dipolar exciton ladders, which is a timely and important advance for the field of moiré-trapped interlayer excitons. The identification of IX3 as a triplet-singlet two-exciton state, rather than a three-exciton state, resolves the puzzle of the unequal ladder spacing previously reported in R-stacked WSe2/WS2. The work is grounded in multiple independent and consistent experimental observables: g-factors, power-law exponents, energy spacings, and polarization data. The assignment of the charged states at ν=1 and the observation of intervalley/intravalley fine structure further enrich the results. The single-particle g-factor framework (Supplemental Material, Sec. S4) provides falsifiable predictions that are cross-checked against the measured values.

major comments (1)
  1. Sec. S4, Fig. S6: The assignment of IX3 as a triplet-singlet two-exciton state hinges on the measured g = +3.16 matching the single-particle prediction for the spin-singlet IX transition. The concern is that this framework treats the exciton g-factor as a sum of single-particle band-edge contributions (spin, atomic orbital, Berry curvature) without accounting for exchange or correlation effects specific to the two-exciton manifold. The manuscript provides two partial cross-checks: (1) the same framework reproduces the triplet g-factors of IX1 (g = -8.73) and IX2 (g = -8.61), and (2) the charged counterpart IX'4 at ν=1 shows g = +3.82, a modest ~20% renormalization. However, the two-exciton state itself involves exciton-exciton interactions absent from the single-particle calculation. While the sign reversal (negative for triplet, positive for singlet) is a qualitative feature robust to a
minor comments (7)
  1. The manuscript is generally well-written and clearly organized. The following are minor presentation issues that do not affect the scientific conclusions.
  2. Fig. 1(d) inset: The power-law exponents for IX1, IX2, and IX3 are quoted in the text (0.85, 1.53, 1.40) but the fit lines in the inset are difficult to distinguish. Consider enlarging or using distinct line styles.
  3. Fig. 2: The IX3 spectra in panels (a-c) are multiplied by a factor of 10 for clarity, but this factor is not noted in the figure caption. Please add this.
  4. Fig. 4(b): The high-energy spectral region is 'multiplied for clarity' but the specific factor is not given. Please specify.
  5. Sec. S4, Fig. S6: The numerical labels for the spin, atomic orbital, and valley contributions used to estimate the effective g-factors are mentioned but not tabulated. A small table listing these values for both triplet and singlet transitions would improve reproducibility.
  6. Page 7, paragraph discussing IX'3 and IX'4: The text states 'The energy separations between IX'1 and IX'3, and between IX'3 and IX'4, are approximately 34 meV and 22 meV, respectively.' It would help to explicitly state the measured peak positions of IX'3 and IX'4 (1.461 eV and 1.483 eV are given earlier) and compute these differences explicitly for the reader.
  7. Reference [31] (Devenica et al., Nature Materials, 2026): The year 2026 appears to be a future date. Please verify this reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive assessment. The referee raises one substantive concern regarding the single-particle g-factor framework used to assign IX3 as a triplet–singlet two-exciton state. We address this below and agree that the manuscript should be revised to more explicitly acknowledge the limitations of the framework and the basis for its qualitative robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Sec. S4, Fig. S6: The assignment of IX3 as a triplet-singlet two-exciton state hinges on the measured g = +3.16 matching the single-particle prediction for the spin-singlet IX transition. The concern is that this framework treats the exciton g-factor as a sum of single-particle band-edge contributions (spin, atomic orbital, Berry curvature) without accounting for exchange or correlation effects specific to the two-exciton manifold. The manuscript provides two partial cross-checks: (1) the same framework reproduces the triplet g-factors of IX1 (g = -8.73) and IX2 (g = -8.61), and (2) the charged counterpart IX'4 at ν=1 shows g = +3.82, a modest ~20% renormalization. However, the two-exciton state itself involves exciton-exciton interactions absent from the single-particle calculation. While the sign reversal (negative for triplet, positive for singlet) is a qualitative feature robust to [

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the single-particle g-factor framework does not capture exchange and correlation effects specific to the two-exciton manifold, and we will revise the manuscript to state this limitation more explicitly. However, we wish to emphasize that the identification of IX3 as a triplet–singlet two-exciton state does not rest solely on the quantitative agreement between the measured g = +3.16 and the single-particle estimate. Rather, it is supported by a convergence of independent observables: (i) the sign reversal of the g-factor relative to IX1 and IX2, which is a qualitative feature arising from the opposite spin contribution of the singlet conduction band and is robust to interaction-induced renormalization; (ii) the energy separation ΔE32 ≈ 22 meV, consistent with the WS2 conduction-band spin splitting ΔC; (iii) the power-law exponent of IX3 (1.40), which is comparable to that of IX2 (1.53) and inconsistent with a three-exciton assignment; and (iv) the nearly vanishing circular polarization of IX3, consistent with an intervalley two-exciton configuration rather than a spin-conserving three-exciton state. The referee's concern about exchange/correlation renormalization is well-taken, and we note that the charged counterpart IX'4 at ν=1 provides an experimental estimate of the scale of such renormalization: its g-factor of +3.82 differs from the neutral IX3 value by ~20%, while preserving the sign. This suggests that interaction effects modify the magnitude but do not invert the sign of the g-factor. We will add a discussion in both the main text and Sec. S4 acknowledging that the single-particle framework provides a qualitative guide rather than a quantitative prediction for the two-exciton states, and that a full microscopic treatment including两 revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; the central claim is supported by multiple independent experimental observables compared against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that IX₃ is a triplet-singlet two-exciton state rather than a three-exciton state—rests on four independent experimental observables: (1) the measured g-factor g_IX3 = +3.16 (opposite sign to IX₁ and IX₂), extracted via standard linear Zeeman fits (Eqs. S3–S5); (2) the measured energy separation ΔE₃₂ = 22 meV, compared to the externally known WS₂ conduction-band spin splitting ΔC (16–30 meV); (3) the measured power-law exponent of 1.40 for IX₃, inconsistent with a three-exciton state; and (4) the measured near-zero circular polarization ρ, consistent with an intervalley configuration. None of these observables are fitted to or defined in terms of the conclusion they support. The single-particle g-factor framework (Sec. S4, Fig. S6) uses Berry-curvature contributions from Kormányos et al. (Ref. [2] in SM), an external k·p theory paper—not a self-citation. The same framework reproduces the triplet g-factors of IX₁ and IX₂ as an internal cross-check, but this is a consistency check, not a circular definition. Self-citations exist (e.g., Ref. [48], Brotons-Gisbert et al. 2020), but they provide background context on spin-layer locking rather than serving as load-bearing derivation steps. The 'prediction' (22 meV offset matching ΔC) is a measured quantity compared to an external benchmark, not a quantity derived from the paper's own fitted parameters. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper does not invent new entities. It assigns observed spectral peaks to known excitonic configurations (triplet, singlet, charged complexes) using established selection rules and a single-particle g-factor framework. The free parameters are empirical energy scales extracted from the data.

free parameters (3)
  • On-site dipolar repulsion U_dd = 38 meV
    Extracted from the measured energy separation between IX₁ and IX₂ at charge neutrality; not a predicted value but an empirical fit to data.
  • WS₂ conduction-band spin splitting ΔC = ~22 meV
    Inferred from the energy separation between IX₂ and IX₃; compared against literature range of 16-30 meV.
  • Characteristic field B_c = 0.03-0.05 T
    Fitted parameter from the magnetic-field dependence of the degree of circular polarization using Eq. S7.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The optical selection rules for interband transitions at the R^X_h moiré site follow Table S1, adapted from Wang et al. (2023).
    The spin-valley assignments of IX peaks depend on these selection rules, which are taken from prior literature.
  • domain assumption The effective exciton g-factor can be estimated within a single-particle framework including spin, atomic orbital, and Berry-curvature contributions (Supplemental Material, Sec. S4).
    This framework is used to predict the g-factor of the spin-singlet IX state, which is central to identifying IX₃. Many-body corrections are not included.
  • standard math The parallel-plate capacitance model (Eq. S1-S2) accurately maps gate voltages to carrier density and electric field.
    Standard assumption for dual-gated 2D devices, used to determine filling factor ν.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 23178 in / 2363 out tokens · 321401 ms · 2026-07-09T05:52:01.457103+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Localized interlayer excitons in moir\'e heterobilayers can form dipolar exciton ladders, yet their internal spin-valley structure remains unresolved. Here, we use helicity-resolved magneto-photoluminescence to identify the microscopic origin of the ladder in R-stacked WSe$_2$/WS$_2$ at charge neutrality and one-electron filling of the moir\'e lattice. At charge neutrality, the first two emission peaks correspond to a spin-triplet interlayer exciton and a triplet-triplet two-exciton state separated by 38 meV, reflecting the on-site dipolar interaction. The opposite Zeeman response of the apparent third rung of the ladder rules out its assignment as a spin-conserving three-exciton state and instead identifies it as a triplet-singlet two-exciton configuration with a 22 meV offset set by the WS$_2$ conduction-band spin splitting. At one-electron filling, the correlated electronic background gives rise to charged one- and two-exciton states and intervalley/intravalley two-exciton configurations, while reducing the effective exciton-exciton interaction. Our results establish a spin-valley-resolved picture of dipolar exciton ladders beyond simple occupation-number physics in moir\'e heterobilayers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07590 by Brian D. Gerardot, Byeong Wook Cho, Kenji Watanabe, Mauro Brotons-Gisbert, Takashi Taniguchi, Tatyana V. Ivanova, Zhe Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the hBN-encapsulated dual-gated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a–c) Helicity-resolved PL spectra of IX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Helicity-resolved PL spectra measured under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Filling-dependent PL spectra measured at 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Atν= 1, the PL spectrum consists of IX ′ 1, IX′ 2, and two additional resonances at 1.461 eV and 1.483 eV, denoted IX′ 3 and IX′ 4, respectively

    By contrast, IX 3 rapidly loses oscillator strength upon both electron and hole dop- ing, indicating that the singlet-derived two-IX channel is strongly suppressed by the presence of resident carriers. Atν= 1, the PL spectrum consists of IX ′ 1, IX′ 2, and two additional resonances at 1.461 eV and 1.483 eV, denoted IX′ 3 and IX′ 4, respectively. These two...

    work page

  2. [2]

    One possible interpretation is that they originate from moir´ e trapping sites with a different atomic registry

    Both peaks are nearly unpolarized, similar to IX 2 and IX 3 at charge neutrality. One possible interpretation is that they originate from moir´ e trapping sites with a different atomic registry. This scenario is unlikely, however, since the calculated energy offset between theR X h site and the next local minimum is expected to be on the order of 7 ∼100 m...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Both IX ′ 3 and IX ′ 4 emerge at higher onset powers than IX ′ 1 and IX ′ 2 and exhibit strongly nonlinear power-law scaling, with exponents of α∼3.4 and 4.0, respectively (Fig. S12). These large ex- ponents suggest that IX′ 3 and IX′ 4 emerge through higher- order formation pathways in the correlated electron–IX background, following the sequential occup...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 (2020), 27

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e bands, Physical Review Letters121, 026402 (2018), 23, 1804.03151

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    C. Jin, E. C. Regan, A. Yan, M. I. B. Utama, D. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Qin, S. Yang, Z. Zheng, S. Shi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Obser- vation of moir´ e excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices, Nature567, 76 (2019), 28, 1812.09815

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. B. Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, J. D. Carlstr¨ om, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020), 29, 1910.09047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    E. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. M. Gabor, Y.- T. Cui, and C. H. Lui, Excitonic and valley-polarization signatures of fractional correlated electronic phases in a WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattice, Physical Review Letters 127, 037402 (2021), 64, 2011.13892

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Observation of Long-Lived Interlayer Excitons in Monolayer MoSe2-WSe2 Heterostructures

    P. Rivera, J. R. Schaibley, A. M. Jones, J. S. Ross, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, P. Klement, K. Seyler, G. Clark, N. J. Ghimire, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Observation of long-lived interlayer excitons in monolayer MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructures, Nature Communications 8 6, 6242 (2015), 07,32, 1403.4985

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Correlated insulator of excitons in WSe2/WS2 moir\'e superlattices

    R. Xiong, J. H. Nie, S. L. Brantly, P. Hays, R. Sailus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, and C. Jin, Cor- related insulator of excitons in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e super- lattices, Science380, 860 (2023), 2207.10764

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Moir\'e-trapped interlayer trions in a charge-tunable WSe$_2$/MoSe$_2$ heterobilayer

    M. Brotons-Gisbert, H. Baek, A. Campbell, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, and B. D. Gerardot, Moir´ e-trapped interlayer trions in a charge-tunable WSe 2/MoSe2 het- erobilayer, Physical Review X11, 031033 (2021), 2101.07747

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    E. Liu, E. Barr´ e, J. v. Baren, M. Wilson, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y.-T. Cui, N. M. Gabor, T. F. Heinz, Y.- C. Chang, and C. H. Lui, Signatures of moir´ e trions in WSe2/MoSe2 heterobilayers, Nature594, 46 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    L. Yuan, B. Zheng, J. Kunstmann, T. Brumme, A. B. Kuc, C. Ma, S. Deng, D. Blach, A. Pan, and L. Huang, Twist-angle-dependent interlayer exciton diffusion in WS2–WSe2 heterobilayers, Nature Materials19, 617 (2020), 1910.02869

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Correlated interlayer exciton insulator in double layers of monolayer WSe2 and moir\'e WS2/WSe2

    Z. Zhang, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Wang, M. Sayyad, K. Yumigeta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, M. Crommie, A. Zettl, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Wang, Correlated interlayer exciton insulator in het- erostructures of monolayer WSe2 and moir´ e WS2/WSe2, Nature Physics18, 1214 (2022), 2108.07131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    H. Fang, Q. Lin, Y. Zhang, J. Thompson, S. Xiao, Z. Sun, E. Malic, S. P. Dash, and W. Wieczorek, Localization and interaction of interlayer excitons in MoSe 2/WSe2 heterobilayers, Nature Communications14, 6910 (2023), 2307.03842

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    X. Wang, J. Zhu, K. L. Seyler, P. Rivera, H. Zheng, Y. Wang, M. He, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. R. Gamelin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Moir´ e trions in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers, Nature Nan- otechnology16, 1208 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Cavity-control of bright and dark interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures

    M. F¨ org, L. Colombier, R. K. Patel, J. Lindlau, A. D. Mohite, H. Yamaguchi, M. M. Glazov, D. Hunger, and A. H¨ ogele, Cavity-control of interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Communications10, 3697 (2019), 1710.00990

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    C. Qian, M. Troue, J. Figueiredo, P. Soubelet, V. Vil- lafa˜ ne, J. Beierlein, S. Klembt, A. V. Stier, S. H¨ ofling, A. W. Holleitner, and J. J. Finley, Lasing of moir´ e trapped MoSe 2/WSe2 interlayer excitons coupled to a nanocavity, Science Advances10, eadk6359 (2024), 2302.07046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Y. Liu, H. Fang, A. Rasmita, Y. Zhou, J. Li, T. Yu, Q. Xiong, N. Zheludev, J. Liu, and W. Gao, Room tem- perature nanocavity laser with interlayer excitons in 2D heterostructures, Science Advances5, eaav4506 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    S. Zhao, Z. Li, X. Huang, A. Rupp, J. G¨ oser, I. A. Vovk, S. Y. Kruchinin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Bilgin, A. S. Baimuratov, and A. H¨ ogele, Excitons in mesoscop- ically reconstructed moir´ e heterostructures, Nature Nan- otechnology18, 572 (2023), 2202.11139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Electrical control of hybrid exciton transport in a van der Waals heterostructure

    F. Tagarelli, E. Lopriore, D. Erkensten, R. Perea-Caus´ ın, S. Brem, J. Hagel, Z. Sun, G. Pasquale, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Malic, and A. Kis, Electrical control of hybrid exciton transport in a van der Waals heterostruc- ture, Nature Photonics17, 615 (2023), 2303.00419

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    N. R. Wilson, P. V. Nguyen, K. Seyler, P. Rivera, A. J. Marsden, Z. P. L. Laker, G. C. Constantinescu, V. Kandyba, A. Barinov, N. D. M. Hine, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden, Determination of band offsets, hybridiza- tion, and exciton binding in 2D semiconductor het- erostructures, Science Advances3, e1601832 (2017), 10

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Extended spatial coherence of interlayer excitons in MoSe$_2$/WSe$_2$ heterobilayers

    M. Troue, J. Figueiredo, L. Sigl, C. Paspalides, M. Katzer, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Selig, A. Knorr, U. Wurstbauer, and A. W. Holleitner, Extended spatial coherence of interlayer excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers, Physical Review Letters 131, 036902 (2023), 2302.10312

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    L. A. Jauregui, A. Y. Joe, K. Pistunova, D. S. Wild, A. A. High, Y. Zhou, G. Scuri, K. D. Greve, A. Sushko, C.-H. Yu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. J. Needleman, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, and P. Kim, Electrical control of inter- layer exciton dynamics in atomically thin heterostruc- tures, Science366, 870 (2019), 1812.08691

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    K. L. Seyler, P. Rivera, H. Yu, N. P. Wilson, E. L. Ray, D. G. Mandrus, J. Yan, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of moir´ e-trapped valley excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 hetero- bilayers, Nature567, 66 (2019), 39, 1809.04562

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    H. Baek, M. Brotons-Gisbert, Z. X. Koong, A. Campbell, M. Rambach, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and B. D. Ger- ardot, Highly energy-tunable quantum light from moir´ e- trapped excitons, Science Advances6, eaba8526 (2020), 37

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Moir\'e excitons: from programmable quantum emitter arrays to spin-orbit coupled artificial lattices

    H. Yu, G.-B. Liu, J. Tang, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Moir´ e excitons: From programmable quantum emitter arrays to spin-orbit–coupled artificial lattices, Science Advances 3, e1701696 (2017), 1710.07015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    H. Park, J. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, L. Fu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, D. R. Gamelin, H. Yu, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Dipole ladders with large Hubbard interaction in a moir´ e exciton lattice, Nature Physics19, 1286 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Z. Lian, Y. Meng, L. Ma, I. Maity, L. Yan, Q. Wu, X. Huang, D. Chen, X. Chen, X. Chen, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, J. Lischner, Y.-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi, Valley-polarized excitonic Mott insu- lator in WS 2/WSe2 moir´ e superlattice, Nature Physics 20, 34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    W. Li, X. Lu, S. Dubey, L. Devenica, and A. Srivastava, Dipolar interactions between localized interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Materials19, 624 (2020), 1910.08139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Huang, C

    L. Huang, C. Ge, B. Xu, Y. Wang, S. Li, X. Luo, H. Zhao, D. Zhang, Z. Zeng, Q. Tong, D. Li, X. Zhu, K. Braun, T. Gao, X. Wang, and A. Pan, Moir´ e-orbital-resolved ex- citonic Mott insulating states and their optical and elec- tric control in van der Waals heterostructures, Physical Review Letters135, 096902 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Moir\'e-Bose-Hubbard model for interlayer excitons in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures

    N. G¨ otting, F. Lohof, and C. Gies, Moir´ e-Bose-Hubbard model for interlayer excitons in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures, Physical Review B105, 165419 (2022), 2201.10877

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    B. Gao, D. G. Su´ arez-Forero, S. Sarkar, T.-S. Huang, D. Session, M. J. Mehrabad, R. Ni, M. Xie, P. Upad- hyay, J. Vannucci, S. Mittal, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Imamoglu, Y. Zhou, and M. Hafezi, Excitonic Mott insulator in a Bose-Fermi-Hubbard system of moir´ e WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer, Nature Communications15, 2305 (2024), 2304.09731

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    L. M. Devenica, Z. Hadjri, J. Kumlin, D. Su´ arez-Forero, R. Li, K. Domi, B. Lyu, W. Li, L. Fausten, V. Vento, N. Ubrig, S. Liu, J. Hone, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Pohl, and A. Srivastava, Collective photon emission and ferroelectric exciton ordering near Mott insulating 9 state in WSe 2/WS2 heterobilayers, Nature Materials , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    S. Miao, T. Wang, X. Huang, D. Chen, Z. Lian, C. Wang, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, Z. Wang, D. Xiao, Y.-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi, Strong interaction between interlayer excitons and correlated electrons in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattice, Nature Communications 12, 3608 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    J. Kim, J. Park, H. Choi, T. Kim, S. Cha, Y. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Kim, M.-H. Jo, and H. Choi, Correlation-driven nonequilibrium exciton site transition in a WSe2/WS2 moir´ e supercell, Nature Com- munications15, 3312 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [38]

    D. Chen, Z. Lian, X. Huang, Y. Su, M. Rashetnia, L. Yan, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, Y.-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi, Tuning moir´ e exci- tons and correlated electronic states through layer degree of freedom, Nature Communications13, 4810 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Physical Review Letters 108, 196802 (2012), 1112.3144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [40]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity, Nature Nanotechnology7, 494 (2012), 05, 1205.1822

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [41]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Physics10, 343 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [42]

    Brightened spin-triplet interlayer excitons and optical selection rules in van der Waals heterobilayers

    H. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and W. Yao, Brightened spin-triplet interlayer excitons and optical selection rules in van der Waals heterobilayers, 2D Materials5, 035021 (2018), 1803.01292

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [43]

    T. Wang, S. Miao, Z. Li, Y. Meng, Z. Lu, Z. Lian, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, and S.-F. Shi, Giant valley-Zeeman splitting from spin-singlet and spin-triplet interlayer excitons in WSe 2/MoSe2 het- erostructure, Nano Letters20, 694 (2020), 1912.11885

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [44]

    Spin structure of K valleys in single-layer WS$_2$ on Au(111)

    P. Eickholt, C. Sanders, M. Dendzik, L. Bignardi, D. Lizzit, S. Lizzit, A. Bruix, P. Hofmann, and M. Do- nath, Spin structure of K valleys in single-layer WS 2 on Au(111), Physical Review Letters121, 136402 (2018), 1807.11235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [45]

    M. A. U. Absor, H. Kotaka, F. Ishii, and M. Saito, Strain-controlled spin splitting in the conduction band of monolayer WS 2, Physical Review B94, 115131 (2016), 1607.07566

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [46]

    Large spin splitting in the conduction band of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers

    K. Ko´ smider, J. W. Gonz´ alez, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Large spin splitting in the conduction band of transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Physical Review B88, 245436 (2013), 1311.0049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  46. [47]

    J. Wang, J. Ardelean, Y. Bai, A. Steinhoff, M. Florian, F. Jahnke, X. Xu, M. Kira, J. Hone, and X.-Y. Zhu, Optical generation of high carrier densities in 2D semi- conductor heterobilayers, Science Advances5, eaax0145 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [48]

    Control of interlayer excitons in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures

    A. Ciarrocchi, D. Unuchek, A. Avsar, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Kis, Polarization switching and electrical control of interlayer excitons in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Photonics13, 131 (2019), 1803.06405

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [49]

    Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer MoSe2

    D. MacNeill, C. Heikes, K. F. Mak, Z. Anderson, A. Korm´ anyos, V. Z´ olyomi, J. Park, and D. C. Ralph, Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer MoSe2, Physical Review Letters114, 037401 (2014), 1407.0686

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [50]

    Y.-C. Wu, M. DeCapua, Z. Xu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, Y. Shi, and J. Yan, Highly tunable valley polariza- tion of potential-trapped moir´ e excitons in WSe 2/WS2 heterojunctions, Physical Review Letters134, 256402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [51]

    Spin-layer locking of interlayer excitons trapped in moir\'e potentials

    M. Brotons-Gisbert, H. Baek, A. Molina-S´ anchez, A. Campbell, E. Scerri, D. White, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Bonato, and B. D. Gerardot, Spin–layer locking of interlayer excitons trapped in moir´ e potentials, Nature Materials19, 630 (2020), 1908.03778

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [52]

    W. Li, X. Lu, J. Wu, and A. Srivastava, Optical con- trol of the valley Zeeman effect through many-exciton interactions, Nature Nanotechnology16, 148 (2021), 2006.03061

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [53]

    Valley depolarization due to inter- and intra-valley electron-hole exchange interactions in monolayer MoS$_{2}$

    T. Yu and M. W. Wu, Valley depolarization due to in- tervalley and intravalley electron-hole exchange interac- tions in monolayer MoS 2, Physical Review B89, 205303 (2014), 1401.0047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [54]

    C. Jin, E. Y. Ma, O. Karni, E. C. Regan, F. Wang, and T. F. Heinz, Ultrafast dynamics in van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature Nanotechnology13, 994 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [55]

    Jiang, S

    Y. Jiang, S. Chen, W. Zheng, B. Zheng, and A. Pan, Interlayer exciton formation, relaxation, and transport in TMD van der Waals heterostructures, Light: Science & Applications10, 72 (2021), 09

    work page 2021

  55. [56]

    Magnetic Control of Valley Pseudospin in Monolayer WSe2

    G. Aivazian, Z. Gong, A. M. Jones, R.-L. Chu, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, C. Zhang, D. Cobden, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in mono- layer WSe2, Nature Physics11, 148 (2015), 1407.2645

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [57]

    Jiang, Y

    Y. Jiang, Y. She, X. Cheng, Q. Tan, J. Yang, Y. Zhao, P. Liu, M. Wu, X. Dai, Z. Wang, H. Cai, N. Pan, and X. Wang, Tuning valley polarization of moir’e-trapped biexcitons by fine-structure occupation in WS2/WSe2 heterostructures, Nature Communications 17, 1089 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    J. Zhu, H. Zheng, X. Wang, H. Park, C. Xiao, Y. Zhang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. R. Gamelin, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Moir´ e exchange effect in twisted WSe2/WS2 heterobilayer, Physical Review Letters133, 086501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [59]

    Unveiling the Spin–Valley Structure of Dipolar Exciton Ladders in R-stacked WSe2/WS2 Moir´ e Heterobilayers

    A. J. Campbell, M. Brotons-Gisbert, H. Baek, V. Vitale, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Lischner, and B. D. Ger- ardot, Exciton-polarons in the presence of strongly cor- related electronic states in a MoSe 2/WSe2 moir´ e super- lattice, npj 2D Materials and Applications6, 79 (2022), 32. Supplemental Material for “Unveiling the Spin–Valley Structure of Dipol...

    work page 2022

  59. [60]

    (b) Integrated PL intensities of IX ′ 1–IX′ 4 as a function of excitation power, plotted on a log–log scale

    The high-energy spectral region containing IX′ 3 and IX ′ 4 is magnified by a factor of 5 for clarity. (b) Integrated PL intensities of IX ′ 1–IX′ 4 as a function of excitation power, plotted on a log–log scale. The extracted power-law exponents are α∼1.0, 2.0, 3.4, and 4.0 for IX ′ 1, IX′ 2, IX′ 3, and IX ′ 4, respectively. 19 S7. DIPOLAR LADDERS IN WSE ...

    work page

  60. [61]

    X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhu, H. Park, Y. Wang, C. Wang, W. G. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, D. R. Gamelin, W. Yao, D. Xiao, T. Cao, and X. Xu, Intercell moir´ e exciton complexes in electron lattices, Nature Materials22, 599 (2023), 2206.08424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [62]

    Korm´ anyos, G

    A. Korm´ anyos, G. Burkard, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, V. Z´ olyomi, N. D. Drummond, and V. Fal’ko, k·ptheory for two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, 2D Materials 21 2, 049501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [63]

    Y. She, Y. Jiang, J. Yang, Y. Zhao, P. Liu, M. Wu, X. Dai, Z. Wang, X. Cheng, H. Cai, N. Pan, and X. Wang, Magneto-polarization controlled by intervalley scattering of interlayer excitons and carriers in WS 2/WSe2 heterostructure, Nano Letters25, 6708 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [64]

    Y.-C. Wu, M. DeCapua, Z. Xu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Shi, and J. Yan, Highly tunable valley polarization of potential-trapped moir´ e excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterojunctions, Physical Review Letters134, 256402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [65]

    Jiang, Y

    Y. Jiang, Y. She, X. Cheng, Q. Tan, J. Yang, Y. Zhao, P. Liu, M. Wu, X. Dai, Z. Wang, H. Cai, N. Pan, and X. Wang, Tuning valley polarization of moir’e-trapped biexcitons by fine-structure occupation in WS 2/WSe2 heterostructures, Nature Communications17, 1089 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [66]

    Z. Lian, Y. Meng, L. Ma, I. Maity, L. Yan, Q. Wu, X. Huang, D. Chen, X. Chen, X. Chen, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, J. Lischner, Y.-T. Cui, and S.-F. Shi, Valley- polarized excitonic Mott insulator in WS 2/WSe2 moir´ e superlattice, Nature Physics20, 34 (2024). 22

    work page 2024