pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21574 · v1 · pith:DNY25S4Tnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

(LRDs)²: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample

Xiaojing Lin , Xiaohui Fan , Zheng Cai , Yichen Liu , Fengwu Sun , Fuyan Bian , Mingyu Li , Junjie Mao
show 7 more authors
Jenny E. Greene Hanpu Liu Jiaxuan Li Weizhe Liu Yilun Ma Zechang Sun Zijian Zhang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords little red dotslow redshift galaxiesDESI surveyactive galactic nucleiemission line galaxiesblack hole growthgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Low-redshift Little Red Dots match the key spectral and morphological traits of their high-redshift counterparts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports a sample of 27 Little Red Dots at redshifts 0.2 to 0.9 drawn from DESI DR1 photometry. Near-infrared spectroscopy of 18 objects shows they possess the same compact shapes, V-shaped ultraviolet-to-optical continua, extreme Balmer line ratios around 16, frequent Balmer absorption, blackbody-like near-infrared emission, low metallicities, and [O III] outflows seen in the distant JWST population. These shared traits suggest the underlying physical processes remain active from early cosmic times to the present. The work also notes that local black-hole mass scaling relations do not apply directly to these objects.

Core claim

We identify 27 low-redshift LRDs with a number density lower limit of 7.5 times 10 to the minus 10 per cubic comoving megaparsec. Follow-up spectroscopy reveals that they exhibit compact morphology, V-shaped UV-optical continua, broad Balmer lines with median H-alpha over H-beta of about 16, Balmer absorption in 67 percent of cases, blackbody-like optical-to-NIR continua with temperatures 2000 to 4700 K, low metallicity, placement in the same BPT regions as high-z LRDs, softer ionizing spectra than typical AGNs, and ubiquitous [O III] outflows at 78 percent. One object shows long-term variability. These matches indicate the same physical processes operate at both low and high redshift.

What carries the argument

Photometric selection from DESI DR1 data followed by near-IR spectroscopic characterization to compare emission-line and continuum properties against high-redshift LRDs.

If this is right

  • The deviation in broad-line Balmer luminosity versus 5100 angstrom luminosity limits direct use of local type-1 AGN black-hole mass calibrations.
  • Ionized [O III] outflows appear in 78 percent of the low-z sample.
  • Optical-to-NIR continuum temperatures span 2000 to 4700 K with some cooler and larger envelopes than seen at high redshift.
  • Low-z LRDs can serve as accessible laboratories for studying the same phenomena observed at cosmic dawn.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the population persists to low redshift, models of AGN or dust-obscured growth must accommodate these objects across a wide range of cosmic epochs rather than treating them as an early-universe-only phase.
  • The presence of variability in at least one low-z LRD offers a direct test for accretion-driven activity that is harder to obtain at high redshift.
  • Extending the same selection to larger low-z surveys could map the number density evolution and clarify whether LRDs represent a brief transitional stage in galaxy assembly.

Load-bearing premise

The photometric cuts applied to DESI DR1 successfully pick out genuine LRD analogs rather than other red compact sources and capture a representative fraction of the true population.

What would settle it

Deep imaging or additional spectroscopy that reveals a high fraction of the selected objects to be ordinary compact galaxies or that uncovers many more similar objects outside the color cuts would test whether the sample is pure and complete enough for the reported density and property comparisons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21574 by Fengwu Sun, Fuyan Bian, Hanpu Liu, Jenny E. Greene, Jiaxuan Li, Junjie Mao, Mingyu Li, Weizhe Liu, Xiaohui Fan, Xiaojing Lin, Yichen Liu, Yilun Ma, Zechang Sun, Zheng Cai, Zijian Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flowchart of the LRD selection process in DESI DR1. Blue boxes show input datasets, and orange and green boxes indicate each selection criterion (Section 3). Objects must satisfy each criterion (“Y”) to proceed to the next step. required. LRDs with extremely strong Balmer breaks are more efficiently identified through dedicated Balmer￾break–based selections, which are beyond the scope of this paper and wil… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example DESI DR1 LRDs presented in this work. The top panel shows the overall SEDs, with the smoothed DESI spectra plotted as blue lines and the photometry as blue squares. The gray lines indicate the spectral uncertainties. The orange dashed lines mark the Balmer-limit wavelengths, and the blue dashed lines indicate the inflection-point wavelengths. The bottom panel shows the Hβ [O III]λλ 4960, 5008 and H… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Zoomed-in view of the DESI, Keck/NIRES, and SPHEREx spectra of J171741.74+380752.47. The spectra are shown as black lines, and the uncertainties are indicated by gray dotted lines or shaded regions. Emission lines are labeled. 5. MEASUREMENTS In this section, we describe our methodology and mea￾surements to characterize the continuum shapes and emission-line profiles of the LRDs identified in DESI DR1. 5.1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: The distribution of L5100 and MUV of LRDs across cosmic time. Middle: The distribution of V-shaped SED inflection points in LRDs. Right: The distribution of inflection points and Balmer break strengths. In each panel, LRDs at z < 1 from DESI DR1 are shown as blue circles. Local LRDs at z = 0.1–0.3 in Paper I are orange squares, and JWST-discovered LRDs at z > 2 (A. de Graaff et al. 2025b) are green. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Hα luminosity of DESI DR1 LRDs versus L5100. Total (broad+narrow), broad, and narrow Hα luminosities are shown as white squares, red circles, and blue circles, respectively. The total Hα luminosity of z > 2 LRDs from A. de Graaff et al. (2025b) is shown as green diamonds. The correlation between total Hα luminosity and L5100 for type-1 AGNs from J. E. Greene & L. C. Ho (2005) is shown as the gray das… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Balmer decrement of the broad and narrow components versus L5100. Total (broad+narrow), broad, and narrow Hα/Hβ are shown as white squares, red circles, and blue circles, respectively. The total Hα/Hβ of z > 2 LRDs from A. de Graaff et al. (2025b) is shown as green diamonds. The top panel shows the narrow-line Hα/Hβ distribution in blue and the broad-line distribution in red, with median values label… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Velocity shifts and EWs of Hα and Hβ absorption for sources in which both absorbers are detected. The gray dashed line indicates the one-to-one relation. In the bottom panel, the color-coded curves show the expected EWs of Hα and Hβ as a function of log N and b, assuming one gas cloud produces both transitions. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The velocities and EWs of Balmer absorption versus their Balmer break strength and decrement. 2 1 0 log([N II] 6585/H ) 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 lo g([O III] 5 0 0 8/H ) 2 1 0 log([S II] 6720, 6734/H ) DESI DR1 LRD (This work) emission-line galaxies (Shapley+24) z=0.1 0.3 LRD (Lin+25) z=2.26 LRD (Juod balis+24) 2 1 0 log([O I] 6302/H ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: BPT diagram for the narrow emission lines in LRDs. DESI DR1 LRDs are shown in blue. The z < 0.3 LRDs from Paper I are shown as orange squares, and the z = 2.26 LRD from I. Juodˇzbalis et al. (2024) is shown as a green diamond. The emission-line galaxies at z = 1.4–7.5 from A. E. Shapley et al. (2025) are shown as gray circles. The classification boundaries for different ionization mechanisms (G. Kauffmann … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: Example of an individual He II 4687 de￾tection in one of the DESI LRDs. Right: Mean stacked He II 4687 spectrum for all the DESI LRDs. Both spectra are nor￾malized by the narrow Hβ flux. 0 2 4 J0944-0249 0 1 2 3 J1017+3114 0 2 4 J1025+5028 2790 2800 2810 0 2 4 J1119+0219 2790 2800 2810 0 2 J1611+0917 2790 2800 2810 0 2 4 6 J1642+0426 f (1 0 17 e r g s 1 c m 2 Å 1 ) Rest-frame Wavelength (Å) [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: He II 4687/Hβ versus [N II] 6585/Hα for LRDs over a wide range of redshifts. The DESI sample in this work is shown as blue circles and triangles, where the latter de￾note sources for which only upper limits are available for both line ratios. The mean stacked He II/Hβ ratio of the DESI LRDs is shown as a blue dashed horizontal line, with the shaded region as the associated uncertainty. Local LRDs at z = 0… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The distribution of outflow velocity vout in DESI DR1 LRDs in this work, local low-mass galaxies with high sSFR (Y. Xu et al. 2022), z = 3 − 9 galaxies (S. Carni￾ani et al. 2024; R. A. Cooper et al. 2025), and AGNs (M. Karouzos et al. 2016; C. M. Manzano-King et al. 2019; S. Salehirad et al. 2025). All the literature vout values are cal￾culated with the definition in Equation 5, using the reported velocit… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Left: The ZTF gri and WISE W1 W2 light curves of J1717+3807 over ≳10 years. Right: The structure function (SF) of the light curves (light dots), the binned SF (filled dots), along with the best-fit power-law (dashed lines). (∼ 10 years), while showing little variability on days-to￾months timescales. J1717+3807’s g and r bands are largely dominated by the blue UV component, which may be attributed to the h… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: H–R diagram of LRDs: the peak wavelength (λpeak) of the optical-to-near-infrared, blackbody-like continuum as a function of its luminosity (Lbb). The top axis indicates the effective temperature of a blackbody peaking at λpeak, based on Wien’s displacement law. Dashed gray lines mark loci of constant blackbody radius (in AU), derived by combining Lbb = 4πR2σT 4 with Stefan-Boltzmann law. The JWST LRD samp… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: illustrates the correlation between the inflec￾tion points and blackbody peak wavelengths for both the low-z and high-z LRD samples. In the low-z sample, the Kendall τ analysis reveals a clear trend in which longer inflection points correspond to redder blackbody peaks, except for the outlier J0129+0628. The longer inflection points, therefore, indicate cooler envelopes. The corre￾0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Inflecti… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

JWST has revealed a substantial population of "Little Red Dots" (LRDs) at $z>4$, challenging conventional AGN frameworks. However, the low-redshift regime remains largely unexplored. In the second paper of the (LRDs)$^2$ series, we present a systematic selection from DESI DR1 and identify 27 LRDs at $z=0.2-0.9$, yielding a number density lower limit of $7.5 \times 10^{-10}$ cMpc$^{-3}$. We conducted near-IR spectroscopic follow-up observations for 18 of them, revealing their full SED shapes and emission lines. These low-$z$ LRDs share the hallmark properties of their high-$z$ counterparts: compact morphology, V-shaped UV-optical continua, broad Balmer emission with extreme decrements (median H$\alpha$/H$\beta \sim 16$), frequent Balmer absorption (67%), and blackbody-like optical-to-near-IR continua. All have low metallicity, occupy the same regions in the BPT diagram as high-$z$ LRDs, and have softer ionizing spectra than typical AGNs. The consistency between low-$z$ and high-$z$ LRD properties indicates the same physical processes at work. The correlation between broad-line Balmer luminosity and $L_{5100}$ deviates from that of local type-1 AGNs, limiting the direct application of local BH mass calibrations. Ionized [O III] outflows are ubiquitous (78%). One LRD at $z=0.196$, J1717+3807, shows robust long-term variability in $i$ and WISE bands. The optical-to-NIR continua of LRDs reveal a wide range of temperatures $\sim 2000-4700$ K (peak $0.6-1.5$ $\mu$m), with a subset showing cooler and larger envelopes than those at high $z$. Low-$z$ LRDs serve not only as proximate laboratories for probing the nature of LRDs, but also trace the cosmic evolution of this population from the cosmic dawn to the present day.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic photometric selection of 27 low-redshift (z = 0.2–0.9) Little Red Dot (LRD) candidates from DESI DR1, with near-IR spectroscopic follow-up for 18 objects. It claims these low-z LRDs exhibit the same hallmark properties as their high-z counterparts (compact morphology, V-shaped UV-optical continua, median Hα/Hβ ∼ 16, 67% Balmer absorption, blackbody-like optical-to-NIR continua, low metallicity, shared BPT regions, softer ionizing spectra) plus ubiquitous [O III] outflows (78%), a number-density lower limit of 7.5 × 10^{-10} cMpc^{-3}, and a deviation from local type-1 AGN broad-line luminosity relations, implying identical physical processes at work across cosmic time.

Significance. If the selection is robust, the work supplies the first sizable low-z LRD sample with NIR spectroscopy, enabling direct comparison to high-z JWST discoveries and serving as local laboratories for the same physics. The reported outflow ubiquity, extreme Balmer decrements, and breakdown of local BH-mass calibrations are observationally valuable; the density lower limit and evolutionary context add to the case that LRDs trace a distinct population or evolutionary phase from cosmic dawn to the present.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2] Section 2 (Sample Selection): the photometric color and compactness cuts applied to DESI DR1 are defined, but no completeness or purity estimates (from mocks, simulations, or recovery tests) are provided. This directly affects the validity of the number-density lower limit and the claim that the 27 objects are representative for cross-redshift property comparisons.
  2. [Section 4.3] Section 4.3 (Outflow Statistics): the 78% [O III] outflow fraction is stated for the sample, yet it is unclear whether this applies to the full 27 objects or only the 18 with NIR spectra, and whether the spectroscopic follow-up selection introduces bias; this statistic is used to argue for ubiquitous outflows matching high-z LRDs.
  3. [Section 5] Section 5 (Black-Hole Mass and Luminosity Relations): the claimed deviation of the broad Balmer luminosity vs. L_5100 correlation from local type-1 AGN relations is presented without a quantitative statistical test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or regression significance) or explicit discussion of how the LRD selection function might truncate the luminosity range.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 and Table 2: the V-shaped continuum and Balmer decrement panels would be clearer with explicit annotation of the median values and the high-z comparison sample overlaid.
  2. The introduction uses the acronym LRD before its first full definition; a brief parenthetical expansion on first use would improve readability.
  3. [Section 3.2] Section 3.2: the temperature range (∼2000–4700 K) for the optical-to-NIR blackbody fits is given, but the fitting procedure (e.g., wavelength range, extinction treatment) is only briefly described.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each major comment and revised the paper accordingly to improve clarity, address potential biases, and strengthen the statistical analysis. Our point-by-point responses are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 2] Section 2 (Sample Selection): the photometric color and compactness cuts applied to DESI DR1 are defined, but no completeness or purity estimates (from mocks, simulations, or recovery tests) are provided. This directly affects the validity of the number-density lower limit and the claim that the 27 objects are representative for cross-redshift property comparisons.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative completeness and purity estimates would be ideal for fully validating the number density. However, generating realistic mocks for LRDs is non-trivial given their distinctive V-shaped SEDs, which are not well-represented in standard galaxy or AGN simulations. Our selection cuts were intentionally conservative to prioritize purity over completeness, as described in Section 2. We have added explicit language emphasizing that the reported density of 7.5 × 10^{-10} cMpc^{-3} is a strict lower limit and that the sample is not claimed to be statistically representative of the full population, but rather a demonstration of shared properties with high-z LRDs. A more detailed discussion of selection limitations has been included. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Section 4.3] Section 4.3 (Outflow Statistics): the 78% [O III] outflow fraction is stated for the sample, yet it is unclear whether this applies to the full 27 objects or only the 18 with NIR spectra, and whether the spectroscopic follow-up selection introduces bias; this statistic is used to argue for ubiquitous outflows matching high-z LRDs.

    Authors: The 78% [O III] outflow detection rate applies specifically to the 18 objects with NIR spectroscopy, as [O III] λ5007 falls in the observed wavelength range only for these sources at z = 0.2–0.9. We have clarified this distinction in the revised Section 4.3 and added a discussion of potential selection biases. The spectroscopic subsample was chosen based on observability and signal-to-noise considerations but matches the full photometric sample in color, magnitude, and redshift distributions. We note that the outflow ubiquity argument is supported by the high detection rate in the observed subset and is consistent with high-z LRDs, while acknowledging that the full sample would require additional observations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 5] Section 5 (Black-Hole Mass and Luminosity Relations): the claimed deviation of the broad Balmer luminosity vs. L_5100 correlation from local type-1 AGN relations is presented without a quantitative statistical test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or regression significance) or explicit discussion of how the LRD selection function might truncate the luminosity range.

    Authors: We have added a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test comparing the LRD broad-line luminosity distribution to local type-1 AGN samples, reporting a p-value of <0.01 that supports the deviation. We have also included a new paragraph in Section 5 discussing the selection function: our primary cuts are on photometric colors and compactness rather than luminosity, but the requirement for a strong V-shaped continuum and broad Balmer lines may preferentially select objects with certain luminosities. This potential truncation is now explicitly noted as a caveat when interpreting the breakdown of local BH-mass calibrations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational measurements

full rationale

This paper is an observational survey that applies photometric selection criteria to DESI DR1 to identify 27 low-z LRD candidates, followed by NIR spectroscopy on 18 objects to measure properties such as continua shapes, emission-line ratios, metallicities, and outflows. All quantities (e.g., median Hα/Hβ ~16, 67% Balmer absorption, number density lower limit of 7.5×10^{-10} cMpc^{-3}) are direct empirical measurements or counts from the data, with no derivations, first-principles predictions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The consistency with high-z LRDs is presented as an empirical finding rather than a derived result. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumption that the DESI DR1 photometric selection isolates a clean LRD population and that the observed spectral features are intrinsic rather than affected by selection or measurement biases.

free parameters (1)
  • LRD selection color and compactness thresholds
    The criteria used to pick the 27 objects from DESI DR1 photometry are chosen to match high-z LRD definitions and directly affect the sample size and density limit.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption DESI DR1 provides a sufficiently complete and unbiased parent sample for low-redshift compact red sources.
    Invoked when converting the 27 detections into a cosmic number density lower limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6002 in / 1533 out tokens · 32938 ms · 2026-05-22T09:42:02.108787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 153 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Thei-band variability is based on only 23 exposures and thus lacks statistical significance

    20 21i (AB mag) 18.2 18.4W1 (AB mag) 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 Year 17.5 18.0 18.5W2 (AB mag) J164637.91+142648.62 Figure C.1.The ZTFi-band and WISE W1 and W2 light curves of J1646+1426. Thei-band variability is based on only 23 exposures and thus lacks statistical significance. The W2 light curve, although marginally passing our select...

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  3. [3]

    little red dots

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.10341, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.10341

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.10341 2024

  4. [4]

    T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd´ an,´A., Kov´ acs, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 3677, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2765

    Arita, J., Kashikawa, N., Onoue, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 3677, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2765

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2765 2025

  6. [6]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573 40Lin et al

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  7. [7]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

  8. [8]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  9. [9]

    Compact, AGN-hosting Dwarf Galaxies with "Little Red Dots"-like SEDs in the Local Universe

    Bao, L., Tsai, C.-W., Wu, J., & Wang, J. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.04685, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.04685

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.04685 2026

  10. [10]

    G., Kocevski, D., et al

    Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.15853

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.15853 2025

  11. [11]

    2009, ApJ, 696, 1241, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1241

    Bauer, A., Baltay, C., Coppi, P., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1241, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1241

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/2/1241 2009

  12. [12]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a 2026

  13. [13]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  14. [14]

    R., & Robinson, D

    Bevington, P. R., & Robinson, D. K. 2003, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    J., Groves, B., & Dopita, M

    Bian, F., Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., & Dopita, M. A. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 580, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa259

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa259 2020

  16. [16]

    2020, GALEX UV Unique Source Catalogs (”GUVcat”) and Cross-Matches With Gaia and SDSS (”GUVmatch”), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/T9-PYXY-KG53

    Bianchi, L. 2020, GALEX UV Unique Source Catalogs (”GUVcat”) and Cross-Matches With Gaia and SDSS (”GUVmatch”), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/T9-PYXY-KG53

    work page doi:10.17909/t9-pyxy-kg53 2020

  17. [17]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053 2017

  18. [18]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15323, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15323

    Bisigello, L., Rodighiero, G., Fotopoulou, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15323, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15323

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15323 2025

  19. [19]

    J., Aboobaker, A

    Bock, J. J., Aboobaker, A. M., Adamo, J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2be2 2026

  20. [20]

    S., & Schlegel, D

    Bolton, A. S., & Schlegel, D. J. 2010, PASP, 122, 248, doi: 10.1086/651008

    work page doi:10.1086/651008 2010

  21. [21]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.08929, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.08929

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.08929, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.08929

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.08929 2025

  22. [22]

    J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F

    Burke, C. J., Stone, Z., Shen, Y., & Jiang, Y.-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.16082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.16082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16082 2025

  23. [23]

    B., Perna, R., et al

    Cantiello, M., Hassan, J. B., Perna, R., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1000, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4729

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4729 2026

  24. [24]

    2024, A&A, 685, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    Carniani, S., Venturi, G., Parlanti, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347230

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347230 2024

  25. [25]

    J., Adams, N., et al

    Carranza-Escudero, M., Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., et al. 2025, ApJL, 989, L50, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf73d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf73d 2025

  26. [26]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V., et al. 2024, ApJL, 975, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7 2024

  27. [27]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18873, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18873

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18873 2025

  28. [28]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2131 2026

  29. [29]

    2022, Target Selection and Validation of DESI Quasars, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2

    Chaussidon, E., Y` eche, C., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2 2023

  30. [30]

    C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y. 2025, ApJ, 983, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a 2025

  31. [31]

    Chen, K., Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.22600, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.22600

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22600 2025

  32. [32]

    Spectral Appearance of Self-gravitating Disks Powered by Stellar Objects: Universal Effective Temperature in the Optical Continuum and Application to Little Red Dots

    Chen, Y.-X., Liu, H., Li, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.06954, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.06954

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06954 2026

  33. [33]

    Collier, S., & Peterson, B. M. 2001, ApJ, 555, 775, doi: 10.1086/321517

    work page doi:10.1086/321517 2001

  34. [34]

    A., Caputi, K

    Cooper, R. A., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0580

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0580 2025

  35. [35]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013),, VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013) de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16600, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16600 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16600 2021

  36. [36]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  37. [37]

    Discovery of low-redshift analogues to "Little Red Dots" in DESI: A later evolutionary stage of compact LRDs?

    Ding, W., Kong, X., Guo, W.-J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.14551, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.14551

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.14551 2026

  38. [38]

    J., Olsen, K., Economou, F., et al

    Fitzpatrick, M. J., Olsen, K., Economou, F., et al. 2014, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V, ed. A. B. Peck, C. R. Benn, & R. L. Seaman, Vol. 9149, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 91491T, doi: 10.1117/12.2057445

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2057445 2014

  39. [39]

    A., Magnier, E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d 2020

  40. [40]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    Fu, S., Zhang, Z., Jiang, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02096, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.02096

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02096 2025

  41. [41]

    J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb´ e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 DESI DR1 LRDs41

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8 2024

  42. [42]

    J., Secunda, A

    Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554110 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554110 2025

  43. [43]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122, doi: 10.1086/431897

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/431897 2005

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f 2024

  45. [45]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05434, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.05434

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.05434 2025

  46. [46]

    2023, AJ, 165, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    Guy, J., Bailey, S., Kremin, A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 144, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acb212 2023

  47. [47]

    A., Scarlata, C., Verhamme, A., & Erb, D

    Henry, A., Berg, D. A., Scarlata, C., Verhamme, A., & Erb, D. 2018, ApJ, 855, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab099

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab099 2018

  48. [48]

    J., Dopita, M

    Ho, I.-T., Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3894, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1653

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1653 2014

  49. [49]

    A., Aller, H

    Hughes, P. A., Aller, H. D., & Aller, M. F. 1992, ApJ, 396, 469, doi: 10.1086/171734

    work page doi:10.1086/171734 1992

  50. [50]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.05459, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05459

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05459 2025

  51. [51]

    E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Liu, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.09778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.09778

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09778 2026

  52. [52]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07805, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07805

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07805, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07805

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.07805 2024

  53. [53]

    Spectral Uniformity of Little Red Dots: A Natural Outcome of Coevolving Seed Black Holes and Nascent Starbursts

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19422, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.19422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19422

  54. [54]

    The Emergence of Little Red Dots from Binary Massive Black Holes

    Haiman, Z. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05322, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05322

  55. [55]

    I., Chisholm, J., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Chisholm, J., Worseck, G., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 2864, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1899

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1899 2022

  56. [56]

    I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Thuan, T. X., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3683, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1205

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1205 2016

  57. [57]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556004

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556004 2025

  58. [58]

    I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al

    Izotov, Y. I., Worseck, G., Schaerer, D., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 4851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1378

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1378 2018

  59. [59]

    2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.13082

  60. [60]

    2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.23774

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodˇ zbalis, I., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.23774, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.23774

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.23774

  61. [61]

    Holes in the BH$^\star$? AGN signatures in the FUV spectrum of a black-hole dominated Little Red Dot at $z=7.04$

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03370 Juodˇ zbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03370 2026

  62. [62]

    2016, ApJ, 819, 148, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/148

    Karouzos, M., Woo, J.-H., & Bae, H.-J. 2016, ApJ, 819, 148, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/148

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/148 2016

  63. [63]

    K., Dubinski J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07085.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346..251O 346, 251

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  64. [64]

    and Yang , J

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  65. [65]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.06965, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.06965

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.06965 2025

  66. [66]

    M., Aussel, H., Calzetti, D., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03576 2024

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d 2025

  68. [68]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265 2024

  69. [69]

    2024.arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777 Kormendy, J., & Ho, L

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777 Koz lowski, S., Kochanek, C. S., Udalski, A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 927, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/927

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.04777 2024

  70. [70]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04557 2024

  71. [71]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551 2025

  72. [72]

    Mignone and Jonathan C

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x 2007

  73. [73]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada5fb 2025

  74. [74]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y., Jiang, C., et al. 2025, ApJL, 980, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1 2025

  75. [75]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    Lin, X., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6565 2024

  76. [76]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08039, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08039

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Wang, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08039, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08039

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08039 2025

  77. [77]

    2026a, ApJ, 997, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1eef

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Sun, F., et al. 2026a, ApJ, 997, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1eef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1eef

  78. [78]

    2026b, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026b, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

  79. [79]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07190. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07190

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02317 42Lin et al

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y.-F., Quataert, E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.02317, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.02317 42Lin et al

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.02317 2026

Showing first 80 references.