pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2410.17036 · v3 · pith:PN7ZBCXNnew · submitted 2024-10-22 · ✦ hep-ex

Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment

J. Aalbers , D. S. Akerib , A. K. Al Musalhi , F. Alder , C. S. Amarasinghe , A. Ames , T. J. Anderson , N. Angelides
show 210 more authors
H. M. Ara\'ujo J. E. Armstrong M. Arthurs A. Baker S. Balashov J. Bang J. W. Bargemann E. E. Barillier D. Bauer K. Beattie T. Benson A. Bhatti A. Biekert T. P. Biesiadzinski H. J. Birch E. Bishop G. M. Blockinger B. Boxer C. A. J. Brew P. Br\'as S. Burdin M. Buuck M. C. Carmona-Benitez M. Carter A. Chawla H. Chen J. J. Cherwinka Y. T. Chin N. I. Chott M. V. Converse R. Coronel A. Cottle G. Cox D. Curran C. E. Dahl I. Darlington S. Dave A. David J. Delgaudio S. Dey L. de Viveiros L. Di Felice C. Ding J. E. Y. Dobson E. Druszkiewicz S. Dubey S. R. Eriksen A. Fan S. Fayer N. M. Fearon N. Fieldhouse S. Fiorucci H. Flaecher E. D. Fraser T. M. A. Fruth R. J. Gaitskell A. Geffre J. Genovesi C. Ghag A. Ghosh R. Gibbons S. Gokhale J. Green M. G. D. van der Grinten J. J. Haiston C. R. Hall T. J. Hall S. Han E. Hartigan-O'Connor S. J. Haselschwardt M. A. Hernandez S. A. Hertel G. Heuermann G. J. Homenides M. Horn D. Q. Huang D. Hunt E. Jacquet R. S. James J. Johnson A. C. Kaboth A. C. Kamaha Meghna K. K. D. Khaitan A. Khazov I. Khurana J. Kim Y. D. Kim J. Kingston R. Kirk D. Kodroff L. Korley E. V. Korolkova H. Kraus S. Kravitz L. Kreczko V. A. Kudryavtsev C. Lawes D. S. Leonard K. T. Lesko C. Levy J. Lin A. Lindote W. H. Lippincott M. I. Lopes W. Lorenzon C. Lu S. Luitz P. A. Majewski A. Manalaysay R. L. Mannino C. Maupin M. E. McCarthy G. McDowell D. N. McKinsey J. McLaughlin J. B. McLaughlin R. McMonigle E. Mizrachi A. Monte M. E. Monzani J. D. Morales Mendoza E. Morrison B. J. Mount M. Murdy A. St. J. Murphy A. Naylor H. N. Nelson F. Neves A. Nguyen C. L. O'Brien I. Olcina K. C. Oliver-Mallory J. Orpwood K. Y Oyulmaz K. J. Palladino J. Palmer N. J. Pannifer N. Parveen S. J. Patton B. Penning G. Pereira E. Perry T. Pershing A. Piepke Y. Qie J. Reichenbacher C. A. Rhyne A. Richards Q. Riffard G. R. C. Rischbieter E. Ritchey H. S. Riyat R. Rosero T. Rushton D. Rynders D. Santone A. B. M. R. Sazzad R. W. Schnee G. Sehr B. Shafer S. Shaw T. Shutt J. J. Silk C. Silva G. Sinev J. Siniscalco R. Smith V. N. Solovov P. Sorensen J. Soria I. Stancu A. Stevens K. Stifter B. Suerfu T. J. Sumner M. Szydagis D. R. Tiedt M. Timalsina Z. Tong D. R. Tovey J. Tranter M. Trask M. Tripathi A. Us\'on A. Vacheret A. C. Vaitkus O. Valentino V. Velan A. Wang J. J. Wang Y. Wang J. R. Watson L. Weeldreyer T. J. Whitis K. Wild M. Williams W. J. Wisniewski L. Wolf F. L. H. Wolfs S. Woodford D. Woodward C. J. Wright Q. Xia J. Xu Y. Xu M. Yeh D. Yeum W. Zha E. A. Zweig
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords WIMP dark matterdirect detectionxenon time projection chambernuclear recoilsbackground rejectionspin-independent limitsLZ experiment
0
0 comments X p. Extension
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{PN7ZBCXN}

Prints a linked pith:PN7ZBCXN badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

LZ reports no WIMP dark matter signal in 4.2 tonne-years of xenon data but sets new world-leading limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents results from a search for nuclear recoils produced by WIMP dark matter in the LUX-ZEPLIN two-phase xenon detector. It uses a total exposure of 4.2 tonne-years, including new data, and introduces active tagging of background events from 214Pb beta decays while identifying enhanced recombination in 124Xe decays as an additional background. After removing artificially injected signal-like events to avoid analyzer bias, the analysis finds no excess above expected backgrounds. This establishes the strongest spin-independent exclusion limits to date, reaching 2.2×10^{-48} cm² at 90% confidence level for a 40 GeV WIMP mass. A sympathetic reader cares because these results narrow the viable properties of dark matter particles and inform the design of future detectors.

Core claim

The analysis of 4.2 tonne-years of data from the LZ two-phase xenon time projection chamber shows no evidence for an excess of nuclear recoils over expected backgrounds after bias mitigation. A new technique actively tags electronic recoils from 214Pb β decays, and enhanced electron-ion recombination is observed in 124Xe two-neutrino double electron capture decays as a noteworthy new background. This yields world-leading constraints on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections, with the strongest exclusion of 2.2×10^{-48} cm² at 90% CL and median sensitivity of 5.1×10^{-48} cm², both at 40 GeV/c², for masses ≥9 GeV/c².

What carries the argument

Two-phase xenon time projection chamber with a new active tagging technique for 214Pb β-decay electronic recoils that improves discrimination from nuclear recoil signals while the bias-mitigation step removes injected artificial events before final analysis.

If this is right

  • Sets the strongest spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross-section limits for masses above 9 GeV/c².
  • Demonstrates that active tagging of 214Pb backgrounds reduces systematic uncertainty in the signal region.
  • Shows that recombination effects in 124Xe decays must be included in background models for xenon detectors.
  • Provides updated sensitivity benchmarks for scaling up to larger xenon exposures in future runs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar tagging methods for lead decays could become standard in other liquid xenon experiments to reach lower backgrounds.
  • The newly noted 124Xe recombination background may require re-evaluation in prior xenon-based dark matter analyses.
  • Continued null results push direct detection toward even larger target masses or complementary techniques like directional readout.

Load-bearing premise

The modeled backgrounds, including the tagged 214Pb decays and the observed 124Xe recombination behavior, fully account for all observed events without unknown contributions that could mimic a nuclear recoil signal.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of nuclear recoil candidates remaining after the background model and bias correction is applied, or an independent experiment reporting a clear signal at cross sections below the LZ exclusion.

read the original abstract

We report results of a search for nuclear recoils induced by weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) dark matter using the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) two-phase xenon time projection chamber. This analysis uses a total exposure of $4.2\pm0.1$ tonne-years from 280 live days of LZ operation, of which $3.3\pm0.1$ tonne-years and 220 live days are new. A technique to actively tag background electronic recoils from $^{214}$Pb $\beta$ decays is featured for the first time. Enhanced electron-ion recombination is observed in two-neutrino double electron capture decays of $^{124}$Xe, representing a noteworthy new background. After removal of artificial signal-like events injected into the data set to mitigate analyzer bias, we find no evidence for an excess over expected backgrounds. World-leading constraints are placed on spin-independent (SI) and spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses $\geq$9 GeV/$c^2$. The strongest SI exclusion set is $2.2\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$ at the 90% confidence level and the best SI median sensitivity achieved is $5.1\times10^{-48}$ cm$^{2}$, both for a mass of 40 GeV/$c^2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a search for WIMP-induced nuclear recoils in the LUX-ZEPLIN two-phase xenon TPC using a total exposure of 4.2±0.1 tonne-years (including 3.3±0.1 tonne-years of new data from 220 live days). A new active tagging technique for electronic recoils from 214Pb β decays is introduced, and enhanced recombination is reported in 124Xe two-neutrino double-electron-capture decays. After removal of injected artificial signal-like events to mitigate analyzer bias, no excess above modeled backgrounds is observed. World-leading 90% CL limits are set on spin-independent and spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections for masses ≥9 GeV/c², with the strongest SI exclusion of 2.2×10^{-48} cm² (and median sensitivity 5.1×10^{-48} cm²) at 40 GeV/c².

Significance. If the background model is complete, the result tightens constraints on WIMP dark matter in the 9–1000 GeV range and demonstrates improved control of electronic-recoil backgrounds in liquid-xenon detectors. The 214Pb tagging method and 124Xe recombination characterization are concrete technical contributions that will inform background strategies in next-generation experiments. The explicit bias-mitigation step via signal injection is a methodological strength that supports the reliability of the reported null result and limits.

major comments (1)
  1. [Background model section] Background model section: the claim that the modeled backgrounds (including the newly tagged 214Pb β decays and the observed 124Xe recombination) fully account for all events in the nuclear-recoil acceptance region is load-bearing for the null result and the derived limits. Explicit quantitative validation against independent data-driven sidebands or control samples for residual nuclear-recoil-like leakage should be provided or expanded to confirm no unmodeled component remains.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the exposure uncertainty (±0.1 tonne-years) should be clarified as to whether it incorporates all systematic contributions or is dominated by live-time statistics.
  2. [Results figures] Figures showing the signal region and efficiency curves: axis labels, acceptance contours, and background model overlays should be made fully self-explanatory without requiring cross-reference to the text.
  3. [References] References: ensure all prior LZ results and relevant background studies (e.g., on 124Xe recombination) are cited with consistent formatting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review of the manuscript, positive assessment of its significance, and recommendation for minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Background model section] Background model section: the claim that the modeled backgrounds (including the newly tagged 214Pb β decays and the observed 124Xe recombination) fully account for all events in the nuclear-recoil acceptance region is load-bearing for the null result and the derived limits. Explicit quantitative validation against independent data-driven sidebands or control samples for residual nuclear-recoil-like leakage should be provided or expanded to confirm no unmodeled component remains.

    Authors: We agree that robust, quantitative validation of the background model is critical to support the null result and the reported limits. The manuscript describes the full background model, including the new active tagging of 214Pb β decays and the observed enhanced recombination in 124Xe two-neutrino double-electron-capture decays. Validation against residual nuclear-recoil-like leakage is performed using independent data-driven sidebands in the electronic-recoil region and control samples derived from calibration data; these are used to constrain leakage into the nuclear-recoil acceptance region and to confirm consistency between the model prediction and observed events. To make this validation more explicit as requested, we will expand the relevant section and associated figures in the revised manuscript to include additional quantitative details, such as the results of sideband fits and associated goodness-of-fit metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental limits from data vs. modeled backgrounds

full rationale

The paper presents results from a direct-detection experiment using new exposure data from the LZ detector. The analysis chain consists of live-time and exposure calculation, active tagging of 214Pb beta decays, observation of recombination in 124Xe decays, removal of injected signal-like events, and statistical comparison of events in the nuclear-recoil acceptance region against expected backgrounds. Limits are extracted via standard profile-likelihood methods. No quantity claimed as a prediction or first-principles result reduces by the paper's equations or self-citations to a fitted parameter or input by construction. Background models are data-driven and externally constrained; self-citations to prior LZ publications supply detector characterization but do not substitute for the current dataset or force the null result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The null-result claim depends on the completeness and accuracy of the background model; no free parameters are explicitly fitted to the signal region in the abstract, and no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption All non-WIMP events are described by the standard model plus known radioactive contaminants and detector response.
    The analysis subtracts expected backgrounds to conclude there is no excess; this assumption is invoked when stating no evidence for signal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 7024 in / 1337 out tokens · 43128 ms · 2026-05-19T04:33:32.083569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Calorimetric approach to paleo-detection of dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    A vacancy-counting calorimetric readout in paleo-detectors provides an event-by-event proxy for nuclear recoil species, suppressing neutron backgrounds and achieving spin-independent dark matter sensitivities of order...

  2. Producing the GeV Galactic Center Excess via Cosmic Ray-Dark Matter Scattering

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Cosmic ray protons scattering off dark matter produce the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess through inelastic up-scattering followed by decay or direct elastic 2-to-3 photon production.

  3. Search for Long-Lived Dark Photons from Dark Radiation at the LHC

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dark radiation from dark matter produced in Z decays generates long-lived dark photons that dominate over meson decays and bremsstrahlung for small kinetic mixing and masses above the GeV scale, allowing FASER2, FACET...

  4. Proof-of-concept of a xenon-based cryogenic heat pump demonstrator for future liquid xenon observatories

    physics.ins-det 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    A hermetically sealed xenon heat pump demonstrator provides 118 W cooling and 121 W heating at 386 W electrical input, sufficient for 3.1 kg/h xenon purification flow and far below the 6 kW of existing helium-based systems.

  5. Precision measurement of positron decay modes of Xe-125 in the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Xe-125 positron decay branching ratio measured as 0.29% at 5.5 sigma significance, providing the first constraint on individual levels in I-125.

  6. Probing the Solar $^8$B Neutrino Fog with XENONnT

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    XENONnT measures solar 8B neutrino coherent scattering at 3.3 sigma, finds no light dark matter, and constrains the weak mixing angle at low momentum transfer.

  7. Towards a Unified Framework for Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter and Electroweak Baryogenesis

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The cS2HDM unifies a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter candidate with electroweak baryogenesis in a two-Higgs-doublet plus complex singlet setup, featuring naturally suppressed DM-nucleon scattering and CP-violating ...

  8. Dark Matter Induced Proton Decays

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework unifies dark matter stability and proton decay via residual Z4 symmetry from U(1)B+L breaking, with one-loop proton decay mediated by TeV-scale dark sector particles whose masses correlate with proton lifetime.

  9. LHC Mono-$W/Z$ Signatures as a Probe for Dark Matter Explanations of Astrophysical Excesses

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LHC mono-W/Z searches with a new channel-separation method can exclude large ranges of neutral and charged mass splittings in the 70-75 GeV IDM dark matter scenario that fits astrophysical excesses.

  10. Monochromatic neutrinos from scotogenic dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    A modified scotogenic model makes the lightest pseudo-Dirac singlet a dark matter candidate that annihilates mostly to neutrino pairs near threshold, reproducing the relic abundance while satisfying direct detection a...

  11. Searching for UFOs from the early universe: direct detection prospects for relativistically decoupling dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Ultrarelativistically decoupling dark matter in Z' portal models has direct detection cross sections that existing experiments like LZ and XENONnT have already excluded over large regions, leaving testable space above...

  12. Dive deeper with SUBMARINE: SUB-Mev dArk matter diRect detectIon using bilayer grapheNE

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bilayer graphene enables sub-MeV dark matter detection via electronic excitations with small exposure and sidereal modulation signatures.

  13. Two Higgs doublet model with a complex singlet scalar and Multi-critical Point Principle

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A 2HDM extended by a complex singlet uses tree-level MPP to motivate degenerate neutral Higgs masses, yielding viable DM phenomenology and a thermally induced strong first-order electroweak phase transition.

  14. Nearly Degenerate Majorana Dark Matter and Its Self-Interactions in a Gauged $U(1)_{L_\mu - L_\tau}$ Model

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A gauged U(1)_{Lμ-Lτ} model generates nearly degenerate Majorana dark matter whose self-interactions via a light scalar mediator set the relic density, resolve core-cusp anomalies, and fit LZ direct detection plus muo...

  15. A Comprehensive Study of WIMP Models Explaining the Fermi-LAT Galactic Center Excess

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    WIMP models for the Galactic Center Excess survive only in finely tuned resonant funnels with portal couplings around 10^-4, with leptophilic vectors and pseudoscalar portals remaining most viable after current bounds.

  16. Cosmological Probes of Lepton Parity Freeze-in Dark Matter: $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ & Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lepton parity stabilizes a Majorana fermion as freeze-in dark matter produced via right-handed neutrino or Higgs decays, yielding detectable gravitational waves or ΔN_eff depending on scalar couplings.

  17. GeV-scale thermal dark matter from dark photons: tightly constrained, yet allowed

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    In a dark-photon-mediated Dirac fermionic DM model, only narrow resonant regions with small dark-sector coupling allow the candidate to saturate the full relic density while evading current direct and indirect detecti...

  18. Monochromatic neutrinos from scotogenic dark matter

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A variation of the scotogenic model makes the lightest pseudo-Dirac fermion singlet a dark matter candidate that annihilates with 90% branching ratio into neutrino pairs near threshold, yielding the observed relic abu...

  19. Singlet-doublet dark matter induced radiative neutrino mass and TeV scale leptogenesis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Singlet-doublet dark matter induces radiative neutrino masses at one loop while enabling TeV-scale leptogenesis in both Majorana and Dirac realizations.

  20. Design, construction, and testing of the PandaX-xT cryogenics system

    physics.ins-det 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The PandaX-xT cryogenics system with two cooling towers delivers 1900 W cooling power at 178 K, the liquid-nitrogen coil supplies over 1500 W emergency cooling, and a 1-tonne prototype maintains xenon vapor pressure s...

  21. WIMP Dark Matter within the dark photon portal

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Derives lower limits on dark photon parameters from thermal relic density for Dirac fermion and complex scalar WIMPs and compares resulting spin-independent cross sections to direct detection upper bounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 20 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    WS2024 samples described previously and (5) events tagged by the Skin or OD. The nuisance parameters, which float within their uncertainties, are the expected number of events for each background source, listed in Table I; the radon tagging efficiency; the neutron veto tagging efficiency; and the 124Xe QLL y /Qβ y, bounded be- tween 0.65 and 0.87. Paramet...

  2. [2]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. As- trophys. 641, A6 (2020)

  3. [3]

    Sofue and V

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39, 137 (2001)

  4. [4]

    Harvey, R

    D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor, and E. Tit- tley, Science 347, 1462 (2015)

  5. [5]

    Arbey and F

    A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.119, 103865 (2021)

  6. [6]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018)

  7. [7]

    Billard et al., Rep

    J. Billard et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 056201 (2022)

  8. [8]

    Akerib et al., arXiv:2203.08084 (2022)

    D. Akerib et al., arXiv:2203.08084 (2022)

  9. [9]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

  10. [10]

    First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023), arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

  11. [11]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,

    Z. Bo et al. (PandaX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

  12. [12]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ), arXiv:1509.02910 (2015), arXiv:1509.02910; B. Mount et al. , arXiv:1703.09144 (2017); D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 953, 163047 (2020)

  13. [13]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 012011 (2024)

  14. [14]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 1068, 169712 (2024), 2405.14732

  15. [15]

    Faham, V

    C. Faham, V. Gehman, A. Currie, A. Dobi, P. Sorensen, and R. Gaitskell, J. Instrum. 10 (09), P09010

  16. [16]

    L´ opez Paredes, H

    B. L´ opez Paredes, H. Ara´ ujo, F. Froborg, N. Marangou, I. Olcina, T. Sumner, R. Taylor, A. Tom´ as, and A. Vacheret, Astropart. Phys. 102, 56 (2018)

  17. [17]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Astroparticle Physics 125, 102480 (2021)

  18. [18]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), JINST 19 (08), P08027, arXiv:2406.12874 [physics.ins-det]

  19. [19]

    Szydagis et al., Noble Element Simulation Technique, v2.4.0 (2023)

    M. Szydagis et al., Noble Element Simulation Technique, v2.4.0 (2023)

  20. [20]

    Szydagis, J

    M. Szydagis, J. Balajthy, G. Block, J. Brodsky, E. Brown, J. Cutter, S. Farrell, J. Huang, E. Kozlova, C. Liebenthal, et al., Front. Detect. Sci. Technol. 2 (2025)

  21. [21]
  22. [22]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 092004 (2020)

  23. [23]

    See Supplemental Material at [url], which includes Ref [44], for additional information

  24. [24]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012010 (2023)

  25. [25]

    D. J. Temples, J. McLaughlin, J. Bargemann, D. Bax- ter, A. Cottle, C. Dahl, W. Lippincott, A. Monte, and J. Phelan, Phys. Rev. D 104, 112001 (2021)

  26. [26]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), arXiv:2503.05679

  27. [27]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 52, 015103 (2024)

  28. [28]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 106, 024328 (2022)

  29. [29]

    J. R. de Laeter, J. K. B¨ ohlke, P. D. Bi` evre, H. Hidaka, H. S. Peiser, K. J. R. Rosman, and P. D. P. Taylor, Pure and Applied Chemistry 75, 683 (2003)

  30. [30]

    Thomas and D

    J. Thomas and D. Imel, Physical Review A 36, 614 (1987)

  31. [31]

    Holm, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65 (1979)

    S. Holm, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65 (1979)

  32. [32]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1 (2011)

  33. [33]

    Baxter et al., Eur

    D. Baxter et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1 (2021); Here we employ a power constraint which uses the expected sen- sitivity of the experiment assuming no signal is present

  34. [34]

    Akerib et al

    D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021303 (2017)

  35. [35]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018)

  36. [36]

    Ajaj et al

    R. Ajaj et al. (DEAP Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022004 (2019)

  37. [37]

    Faulkner et al., J

    P. Faulkner et al., J. Phys. G 32, N1 (2006)

  38. [38]

    Britton et al

    D. Britton et al. , Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 2447 (2009)

  39. [39]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. Men´ endez, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074018 (2020)

  40. [40]

    Pirinen, J

    P. Pirinen, J. Kotila, and J. Suhonen, Nucl. Phys. A 992, 121624 (2019)

  41. [41]

    B. S. Hu, J. Padua-Arg¨ uelles, S. Leutheusser, T. Miyagi, S. R. Stroberg, and J. D. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 072502 (2022)

  42. [42]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141301 (2019)

  43. [43]

    Xia et al

    J. Xia et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 792, 193 (2019)

  44. [44]

    Akerib et al

    D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017)

  45. [45]

    Amole et al

    C. Amole et al. (PICO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019)

  46. [46]

    J. Xu, S. Pereverzev, B. Lenardo, J. Kingston, D. Naim, A. Bernstein, K. Kazkaz, and M. Tripathi, Phys. Rev. D 99, 103024 (2019), arXiv:1904.02885 [physics.ins-det]. 1 Supplemental Materials Data Samples Figure S1 shows the WS2024 and WS2022 events passing all data selection criteria grouped in their respective sample in the likelihood. Table S1 lists the...